| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2002;106:2188.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Department of Sports Medicine, Institute of Health and Sport Sciences (S.M., T.T., Y.I.-T., M.M.), Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine (T.M., M.I., I.Y.), and Department of Pharmacology (K.G.), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Correspondence to Mitsuo Matsuda, MD, PhD, Department of Sports Medicine, Institute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8574, Japan. E-mail m-matsuda{at}taiiku.tsukuba.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Regional blood flow in the kidney, spleen, stomach, intestine, and muscles was measured using the microsphere technique before and during treadmill running of 30 minutes duration at 30 m/min after pretreatment with either an ETA-receptor antagonist (TA-0201; 0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle in rats. Blood flow in the kidney, spleen, stomach, and intestine was decreased by exercise, but the magnitude of the decrease after pretreatment with TA-0201 was significantly smaller than that after pretreatment with vehicle. Furthermore, the increase in blood flow to active muscles induced by exercise was significantly smaller in rats pretreated with TA-0201 than those pretreated with vehicle.
Conclusions The present study revealed that ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction participates in the decrease of blood flow in the internal organs of rats during exercise, and therefore, that these actions of endogenous ET-1 partly contribute to the increase of blood flow in active muscles during exercise. The data suggest that endogenous ET-1 participates in the exercise-induced redistribution of tissue blood flow.
Key Words: endothelin exercise blood flow receptors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical Procedures for Microsphere Technique of Tissue Blood Flow Measurement
Surgical procedures were performed according to the method described by Laughlin et al.1 After the training period, each rat was instrumented with 2 permanently implanted polyurethane catheters in the ascending aorta via the right carotid artery and in the descending aorta via the left renal artery.
Experimental Protocol
Rats were placed on the treadmill and blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. After the intra-arterial administration of TA-02012 (0.5 mg/kg: Tanabe Seiyaku Co; 8 rats: TA-0201 group), SB2096702 (10 mg/kg: SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals; 6 rats: SB209670 group), or saline as a vehicle (8 rats: control group), the first infusion of microspheres into ascending aorta was performed. The rats then ran on treadmill (0% grade) for 30 minutes at 30 m/min, followed by the second infusion of microspheres. Plasma lactate concentration was measured.
On completion of exercise, each rat was given pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg) for anesthesia. The right kidney, spleen, stomach, intestine, and muscles (tibialis anterior muscle, plantaris, and soleus) were removed.
We also attempted to investigate the interaction of endothelin-receptor antagonist and adrenergic blockade. Under
-adrenergic blockade (3 mg/kg phentolamine) or ß-adrenergic blockade (6 mg/kg propranolol), however, the rats were unable to complete this 30-minute exercise.
Blood Flow Measurements
The stable isotope-labeled microsphere technique was performed according to the method described by Reinhardt et al.5 The microsphere suspension was injected into the aortic catheter. Simultaneously, a 1.5-minute reference blood sample was drawn at 0.8 mL/min from the renal arterial catheter. To test the adequacy of mixing by the aortic infusion, blood flows to bilaterally paired kidneys were compared in 5 other rats; no significant difference between the right and left kidney was seen (5.73±0.44 versus 5.68±0.48 mL · min-1 · g-1, each of five rats). Cardiac output was determined as previously described.6
Data Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. To evaluate the differences between before and during exercise, Fishers protected least significant difference (PLSD) test for multiple comparisons and Students t test for paired values were used. To evaluate the differences between the TA-0201 or SB209670 and control groups, Students t test for unpaired values was used. P<0.05 was accepted as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Effects of TA-0201 Infusion on Visceral and Muscle Blood Flows
Visceral blood flow in both the control and TA-0201 groups was markedly decreased by exercise, and the magnitude of the decrease was significantly smaller in the TA-0201 group than controls (Figure 2). Visceral vascular resistance was markedly increased after exercise in both the control and TA-0201 groups, and the magnitude of the increase was significantly smaller in the TA-0201 group than controls (Table 2).
|
Muscle blood flow in both the control and TA-0201 groups was markedly increased by exercise, and the magnitude of the increase was significantly smaller in the TA-0201 group than controls (Figure 3). After exercise, the muscle vascular resistance was markedly decreased in both the control and TA-0201 groups, and the magnitude of the decrease was significantly smaller in the TA-0201 group than controls (Table 2).
|
Effects of SB209670 Infusion on Visceral and Muscle Blood Flows
Visceral blood flow in both the control and SB209670 groups was markedly decreased by exercise, and the magnitude of the decrease was significantly smaller in the SB209670 group than controls (Figure 4A through 4D). Muscle blood flow in both the control and SB209670 groups was markedly increased by exercise, and the magnitude of the increase was significantly smaller in the SB209670 group than controls (Figure 4E and 4F).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The magnitude of the exercise-induced changes in visceral and muscle blood flows was of the same degree between the ETA-receptor blockade and ETA/B dual receptor blockade. Although the vascular ETB receptor system may cause constriction or dilation of vessels,2 the reversal of the redistribution caused by the ETA-receptor blockade was similar in degree to that of ETA/B receptor blockade in the present study.
Active muscles are supplied an efficient blood flow through exercise-induced redistribution of cardiac output, and thereby allow performance of intense exercise. Because the blood flow to active muscles in the TA-0201 group was lower than that in controls, the extent of anaerobic metabolism in active muscles might be more remarkable in the TA-0201 group than in controls. The plasma lactate concentration, however, was the same in the control group and TA-0201 group (4.9 versus 4.8 mmol/L). Because the present exercise intensity might be at a near the anaerobic threshold level in rats (4.0 mmol/L),7 it is possible that plasma lactate concentration during a more intense exercise might be higher in the TA-0201 group than in the controls.
ETA-receptor blockade caused no significant change in mean blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance during exercise, although the magnitudes of decrease in visceral blood flow and increase in visceral vascular resistance were significantly depressed by ETA-receptor blockade. On the other hand, the magnitude of decrease in active muscle vascular resistance during exercise was significantly depressed by ETA-receptor blockade. This unexpected finding implies that the ETA-receptor blockade might cause vasoconstriction in active muscle to maintain blood pressure during exercise. The finding that ETA-receptor blockade did not cause a decrease in systemic resistance suggests that alternate endogenous mechanisms caused vasoconstriction to compensate for the loss of ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction in the splanchnic organs, and that this effect was prominent in active skeletal muscle. An increase in adrenergic vasoconstriction after ETA- receptor blockade is a possible mechanism for the increased resistance to blood flow in the active muscle, as adrenergic vasoconstriction is known to compete with metabolic vasodilation.
In conclusion, the data suggest that ET-1 participates in the exercise-induced redistribution of tissue blood flow.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 20, 2002; revision received August 19, 2002; accepted August 30, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Miyauchi T, Masaki T. Pathophysiology of endothelin in the cardiovascular system. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999; 61: 391415.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Maeda S, Miyauchi T, Goto K, et al. Alteration of plasma endothelin-1 by exercise at intensities lower and higher than ventilatory threshold. J Appl Physiol. 1994; 77: 13991402.
4. Maeda S, Miyauchi T, Kobayashi T, et al. Exercise causes tissue-specific enhancement of endothelin-1 mRNA expression in internal organs. J Appl Physiol. 1998; 85: 425431.
5. Reinhardt CP, Dalhberg S, Tries MA, et al. Stable labeled microspheres to measure perfusion: validation of a neutron activation assay technique. Am J Physiol. 2001; 280: H108H116.
6. Archie JP, Fixler DE, Ullyot DJ, et al. Measurement of cardiac output with and organ trapping of radioactive microspheres. J Appl Physiol. 1973; 35: 148154.
7. Pilis W, Zarzeczny R, Langfort J, et al. Anaerobic threshold in rats. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1993; 106: 285289.[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Faoro, S. Boldingh, M. Moreels, S. Martinez, M. Lamotte, P. Unger, S. Brimioulle, S. Huez, and R. Naeije Bosentan Decreases Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Improves Exercise Capacity in Acute Hypoxia Chest, May 1, 2009; 135(5): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Wray, S. K. Nishiyama, A. J. Donato, M. Sander, P. D. Wagner, and R. S. Richardson Endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction at rest and during dynamic exercise in healthy humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2550 - H2556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iemitsu, S. Maeda, S. Jesmin, T. Otsuki, Y. Kasuya, and T. Miyauchi Activation pattern of MAPK signaling in the hearts of trained and untrained rats following a single bout of exercise J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 151 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Maeda, T. Miyauchi, M. Iemitsu, T. Tanabe, K. Goto, I. Yamaguchi, and M. Matsuda Endothelin receptor antagonist reverses decreased NO system in the kidney in vivo during exercise Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2004; 286(4): E609 - E614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |