| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2002;106:1840.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (N.I., K.S., H.M., M.S., S.U., M.O., R.N.), University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine; the Department of Pathology, Wakayama (Japan) Medical College (I.M.); and the Department of Pathology, Inoue (Japan) Memorial Hospital (I.Y.).
Correspondence to Dr Nobukazu Ishizaka, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. E-mail nobuishizka-tky{at}umin.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Angiotensin II was continuously infused to rats at a dose of 0.7 mg/kg per day for 7 consecutive days. No iron deposits were observed in the hearts of untreated rats, whereas iron deposition was seen in the cells in the subepicardial and granulation regions after angiotensin II infusion. Concomitant administration of deferoxamine, an iron chelator, significantly reduced the extent of cardiac fibrosis, which suggests that iron deposition aggravates the cardiac fibrosis induced by angiotensin II. Iron overload caused by the administration of iron-dextran resulted in an augmentation of cardiac fibrosis and the generation of neointimal cells in the coronary artery in angiotensin IIinfused rats. By contrast, neointima was not formed in the cardiac vessels in norepinephrine-infused rats with iron overload.
Conclusions Cardiac iron deposition may be involved in the development of cardiac fibrosis induced by angiotensin II. In addition, iron overload may enhance the formation of neointima under conditions of increased circulating angiotensin II but not catecholamines.
Key Words: angiotensin stress oxygen catecholamines
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein Purification and Western Blot Analysis
Protein was isolated by homogenizing samples in the lysis buffer including protease inhibitors: 50 mmol/L HEPES, 5 mmol/L EDTA, and 50 mmol/L NaCl (pH 7.5), 10 µg/mL aprotinin, 1 mmol/L PMSF, and 10 µg/mL leupeptin. Polyclonal antibody against rat ferritin (Panapharm) was used at a 1/2000 dilution.6 The ECL Western blotting system (Amersham) was used for detection. Bands were visualized with the use of a lumino-analyzer (Fuji Photo Film). Band intensity was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the control value.
Histological and Immunohistochemical Analyses
Quantification of the fibrous areas was performed by the operator without knowledge of the treatment group. After Mallory-Azan staining, heart sections were photographed and digitalized and the number of pixels of blue color was counted with the use of a photoimaging system (Canon). The ratios of the area affected by fibrosis to total cardiac area in the samples were expressed as percent fibrosis. Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously.6 Primary antibodies against rat macrophage/monocyte (ED-1; Chemicon International), rat HO-1 (StressGen), human
-SM actin (Sigma) and rat ferritin were used at 1/200, 1/200, 1/1000, and 1/200 dilutions, respectively. For immunofluorescence staining, rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse (Chemicon International) and fluorescein-conjugated anti-rabbit (Sigma) antibodies were used at a 1/100 dilution. Laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with differential interference contrast imaging was performed with the use of FLUOVIEW FV300 (Olympus).
Electron Microscopy
Samples were first fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, subsequently fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, and then embedded in EPON. Ultrathin sections stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate were examined with a transmission electron microscope (JEM 1200 EX; JEOL).
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. We used ANOVA followed by a multiple comparison test for comparisons on initial data before expressing results as a percentage of the control value, using the statistical analysis software Statistica version 5.1 J for Windows (StatSoft Inc). A value of P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-smooth muscle actinpositive spindle-shaped cells, that is, myofibroblast-like cells, in these regions were negative for iron (Figure 1, e and f). The iron-laden cells stained positively for ferritin in the granulation (arrows in Figure 1, g through i) and subepicardial (arrowheads in Figure 1, j through l) regions. Ferritin protein expression was induced markedly by angiotensin II infusion (Figure 1, m and n) but was subsequently blocked completely by losartan and partially by hydralazine (Figure 1o). Norepinephrine, which caused hypertensive effects comparable to those of angiotensin II (200±3 mm Hg, n=8), did not increase cardiac expression of ferritin (Figure 1o) or cause cardiac iron deposition (data not shown). Ferritin expression (Figure 1o) roughly correlated with the extent of iron deposition, as demonstrated histologically (data not shown). No positive staining for iron could be seen in the heart of rats not infused with angiotensin II (data not shown).
|
Effect of Iron Chelation on Angiotensin IIInduced Cardiac Fibrosis
We examined whether deposition of cardiac iron is involved in the cardiac fibrosis induced by angiotensin II. DFO treatment did not significantly alter hemodynamic values in nontreated or angiotensin IItreated rats (DFO alone, 131±2 mm Hg, n=6, DFO plus angiotensin II, 197±8 mm Hg, n=9, NS versus control and angiotensin II groups, respectively). However, it reduced the extent of the fibrous areas induced by angiotensin II (Figure 2a). Treatment of rats with DFO also suppressed angiotensin IIinduced upregulation of ferritin (Figure 2b) and deposition of cardiac iron (data not shown). Losartan, which completely blocked the angiotensin IIinduced upregulation of cardiac ferritin (Figure 1o), also completely suppressed the fibrotic effects of angiotensin II (fibrotic area; right ventricle 0.74±0.13%, left ventricle 0.12±0.03%, n=4, P<0.05 versus angiotensin II group).
|
Iron Overload in Hypertensive Animals
Next, we examined whether iron overload affects cardiac damage induced by vasopressors. Iron loading by itself resulted in a slight increase in blood pressure (Fe alone, 142±2 mm Hg, n=10, P<0.01 versus control) and in cardiac fibrosis in the right ventricle. Iron loading did not significantly change the blood pressure of angiotensin IIinfused rats (Fe plus angiotensin II, 196±11 mm Hg, n=11, NS versus angiotensin II group) or that of norepinephrine-infused rats (Fe plus norepinephrine, 193±8 mm Hg, n=12, NS versus norepinephrine group). Iron loading significantly increased cardiac fibrosis in both ventricles of rats given angiotensin II and in the left ventricle of rats given norepinephrine (Figure 3). Histological examination showed that there was no apparent iron deposition in the vascular wall of rats given angiotensin II (Figure 4a) or norepinephrine (Figure 4b). Iron overload by itself resulted in an iron deposition in the interstitial and perivascular regions but again, not in the vessel wall (Figure 4c). In the heart of angiotensin IIinfused rats with iron loading, robust iron deposition could be observed both in the arterial wall and in the interstitial cells (Figure 4, d and e). In contrast, iron deposition was not seen in the vascular wall in the heart of norepinephrine-infused rats with iron overload (Figure 4f). Some endothelial cells stained positively for iron. Elastica-van Gieson staining of the serial sections showed that there was apparent neointima formation and iron deposition in neointimal cells (Figure 4, g through i). Iron deposits were also seen in the medial smooth muscle cells (Figure 4, j through l). Staining for both
-smooth muscle actin and iron showed that iron was deposited in neointima (Figure 5, a through c) and in myofibroblast-like cells (Figure 5, d through g). Some iron-laden cells were ED-1positive (Figure 5, h and i) and thus judged to be monocytes/macrophages.
|
|
|
Electron Microscopy
Toluidine blue staining showed thickening of the vascular wall (Figure 6a) in the heart of angiotensin IIinfused rats with iron overload. Electron microscopy showed that there were electron-dense deposits, that is, iron particles, both within and outside the vascular cells (Figure 6b). These iron deposits were observed in granules with limiting membranes and thus lysosomes (Figure 6c, arrows). Occasionally, iron deposition was seen between the plasma membrane and basement membrane (Figure 6c, arrowheads). Iron deposits were also observed in the interstitial cells surrounding the vascular cells (Figure 6d). Notably, no iron deposits were apparent in cardiomyocytes (Figure 6d). Iron deposits were found in vascular endothelial cells, as observed by Prussian blue staining (Figure 6e).
|
Localization of Cardiac HO-1 After Iron Overload and Angiotensin II Infusion
Finally, we investigated the expression of HO-1 in the heart of angiotensin IIinfused rats with iron loading. Confocal microscopy revealed that only a fraction of the ED-1positive cells expressed high levels of HO-1 (arrows in Figure 7, a through c). Some cells that were positive for both ED-1 and HO-1 did not contain iron (arrowheads in Figure 7, f through h), whereas some ED-1positive cells with apparent iron deposition did not express HO-1 (arrows in Figure 7, f, h, and j). Costaining of the sections for
-smooth muscle actin and HO-1 showed that most of the neointima cells with iron deposition did not express HO-1 (Figure 7, k through o), and the myofibroblast-like cells in the granulation regions did not express high levels of HO-1 (Figure 7, p through t). These results indicate that high expression levels of HO-1 do not necessarily represent a marker of iron deposition in the heart of rats treated with both angiotensin II infusion and iron overload.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although there could be several possible sources of the iron deposits observed in the heart of the angiotensin-infused rats, two sources seem more likely than others. First, because angiotensin II causes myocardial damage, heme protein released by the damaged muscular cells may be the source of the iron. Second, similar to what happens in ischemia-reperfusion,15 angiotensin II may cause destabilization of the intracellular mitochondrial and microsomal heme proteins, such as cytochromes,16 resulting in an increase in intracellular heme.
In humans, iron overload and subsequent tissue iron deposition can be seen in some disorders such as idiopathic hemochromatosis2 and transfusion-related siderosis.3 As in the liver, iron deposition in the heart is postulated to induce cardiac dysfunction, in part, by inducing reactive fibrosis. In some animal models of iron overload, the occurrence of both cardiac iron deposition and fibrosis have been reported.17,18 Our data suggest that iron deposition may exacerbate the cardiac fibrosis induced by angiotensin II. The findings that the myocardial fibrosis that occurs after myocardial ischemia can be attenuated by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor antagonist19 and that less cardiac fibrosis is observed in the AT1 receptor knockout mouse than in wild-type20 suggest that angiotensin II has a crucial role in the development of cardiac fibrosis. Several factors that possibly mediate the fibrogenic effects of angiotensin II have been reported, such as transforming growth factor-ß and cardiac aldosterone. Whether iron deposition causes cardiac upregulation of transforming growth factor-ß, as it does in the liver,21 should be elucidated in future studies.
Increased generation of reactive oxygen species is thought to be involved in the development of cardiac fibrosis, because in certain disorders, antioxidants can attenuate cardiac fibrosis.22 Iron is known to play a crucial role in the generation of highly toxic hydroxyl radicals via the Haber-Weiss and Fenton reactions. Although the reactive oxygen species that are most potent in the formation of fibrotic regions in the heart remains to be determined, generation of hydroxyl radicals through these reactions may have a role in the development of cardiac fibrosis by mechanisms similar to those proposed for other organs.2325
Another intriguing finding of the present study was that coadministration of iron dextran plus angiotensin II but not iron dextran plus catecholamines induced neointima formation with marked deposits of iron. A link between iron and the development of atherosclerosis has been the subject of debate for more than two decades.4,26 Recent studies have shown that administration of an iron-chelating agent suppresses neointimal formation in the balloon-injured porcine artery27 and that an iron-deficient diet blocks atherogenesis in atherosclerosis-prone animal models.5 These findings indicate that iron is involved in the generation of vascular lesions. Daemen et al28 showed that a 2-week infusion of angiotensin II infusion, at a rate comparable to that used in our model, enhanced neointimal formation in the rat carotid artery induced by balloon injury, whereas angiotensin II infusion alone did not form neointima. Carthew et al18 showed that in a rodent model of iron overload, with a larger dose and for a longer period than used in our protocol, cardiac fibrosis and iron deposition occurred in the myocardium, although neointimal formation was not noted. Consistent with these studies, we found that neointima did not form in the hearts of rats treated by iron overload alone or by angiotensin II infusion alone. Thus, iron may act to promote arteriosclerosis and neointimal formation when other proatherogenic stimuli, such as endothelium removal or increased circulatory levels of angiotensin II, are present.
We previously reported the high expression of HO-1 in the renal cells containing iron deposits after angiotensin II infusion, 6 which suggested that HO-1 induction might be a possible marker of intracellular iron deposition. However, confocal microscopic analysis revealed that unlike in the kidney, HO-1 expression does not appear to be a good marker for iron deposition in cardiac cells under our experimental conditions.
In summary, continuous administration of angiotensin II but not catecholamines induced cardiac deposition of iron. Iron chelation ameliorated and iron overload exacerbated the extent of angiotensin IIinduced cardiac fibrosis, which suggests that iron may be involved in the development of cardiac fibrosis induced by angiotensin II. In addition, iron overload caused prominent neointimal formation in the heart angiotensin IItreated but not norepinephrine-treated rats. Iron overload may therefore enhance the proliferative properties of intimal cells induced by angiotensin II. Our rat model of angiotensin II and iron-dextran administration may represent a new tool for identifying the pathway of neointima hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in the context of the activated renin angiotensin system.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 6, 2002; revision received July 8, 2002; accepted July 8, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A M Emara, R S El Kelany, and K A Moustafa Comparative study of the protective effect between deferoxamine and deferiprone on chronic iron overload induced cardiotoxicity in rats Human and Experimental Toxicology, July 1, 2006; 25(7): 375 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ishizaka, K. Saito, I. Mori, G. Matsuzaki, M. Ohno, and R. Nagai Iron Chelation Suppresses Ferritin Upregulation and Attenuates Vascular Dysfunction in the Aorta of Angiotensin II-Infused Rats Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2282 - 2288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ishizaka, K. Saito, E. Noiri, M. Sata, H. Ikeda, A. Ohno, J. Ando, I. Mori, M. Ohno, and R. Nagai Administration of ANG II induces iron deposition and upregulation of TGF-{beta}1 mRNA in the rat liver Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): R1063 - R1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Saito, N. Ishizaka, T. Aizawa, M. Sata, N. Iso-o, E. Noiri, I. Mori, M. Ohno, and R. Nagai Iron chelation and a free radical scavenger suppress angiotensin II-induced upregulation of TGF-{beta}1 in the heart Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1836 - H1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ramakrishna, T. W Rooke, and L. T Cooper Iron and peripheral arterial disease: revisiting the iron hypothesis in a different light Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2003; 8(3): 203 - 210. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |