| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2002;106:1610.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (M.D., P.W.S., D.P.F., K.T., E.R., J.V., P.C.S., W.J.v.d.G., M.v.d.B., P.d.F.); and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass (J.J.P.).
Correspondence to Prof PW Serruys, MD, PhD, Thoraxcenter, Bd-408, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Dr. Molewaterplein-40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail Serruys{at}card.azr.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Fifteen patients with de novo coronary artery disease were treated with 18-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stents (Cordis) loaded with 140 µg sirolimus/cm2 metal surface area in a slow release formulation. Quantitative angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed according to standard protocol. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was successful in all 15 patients. During the in-hospital course, 1 patient died of cerebral hemorrhage after periprocedural administration of abciximab, and 1 patient underwent repeat stenting after 2 hours because of edge dissection that led to acute occlusion. Through 6 months and up to 2 years of follow-up, no additional events occurred. QCA analysis revealed no significant change in stent minimal lumen diameter or percent diameter stenosis, and 3-dimensional IVUS showed no significant deterioration in lumen volume. In 2 patients, additional stenting was performed because of significant lesion progression remote from the sirolimus-eluting stent.
Conclusion Sirolimus-eluting stents showed persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia for up to 2 years of follow-up.
Key Words: stents restenosis ultrasonics drugs
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In brief, patients with short (<15 mm) de novo coronary lesions received a single 18-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stent (Cordis). All lesions were predilated before stent implantation. The sirolimus coating was a slow-release formulation (
28-day drug release with 140 µg of sirolimus per cm2 stent surface area). All patients received aspirin (325 mg/d, indefinitely) and clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose immediately and 75 mg/d for 8 weeks).
Angiographic and IVUS Analysis
Serial coronary angiography was performed at baseline, 6 months, and late follow-up (mean 20.3±2.4; range 18 to 24 months). Two coronary segments were subjected to quantitative angiography (QCA), one in stent and one in lesion. The in-stent segment encompassed only the 18-mm segment covered by the stent. The in-lesion segment was defined as the stent plus 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the edge or the nearest side branch. In-stent and in-lesion stenosis was defined as >50% diameter stenosis. QCA analysis was done by an independent core laboratory (Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass).
Stented vessel segments were examined with mechanical IVUS, using automated pullback at 0.5 mm per second. A coronary segment beginning 5 mm distal to and extending 5 mm proximal to the stented segment was also examined. A computer-based contour detection program was used for automated 3-dimensional reconstruction of the stented segment from up to 200 cross-sectional images.9
Clinical Follow-Up
We assessed the clinical outcome during the hospital stay, at 6 months, and up to 2 years later. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, acute myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization of the target lesion and/or vessel by coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data are presented as mean±SD. Multiple comparisons between postprocedural 6- and 20-month follow-up measurements were performed by ANOVA. Paired comparisons were performed by Students t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
At 18 months after the procedure, 1 patient demonstrated a significant stenosis (60% diameter stenosis; fractional flow reserve 0.65) located distally to the sirolimus stent (8 mm from distal edge by quantitative IVUS) that was treated by direct stenting. Another patient presented with effort angina 22 months after the index procedure and underwent stenting because of progression of a preexisting atherosclerotic lesion 12 mm from the distal edge of the sirolimus stent (minimal lumen area by IVUS 3.5 mm2 after the procedure and 3.0 mm2 at 22-month follow-up). Volumetric IVUS measurements showed no neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) in the stented segment. Lumen volume of both 5-mm proximal and distal edges of the sirolimus stent revealed virtually no changes when comparing postprocedural, 6-month, and 22-month follow-up measurements.
At almost 2 years of follow-up, 1 death (noncardiac) and 1 target-lesion revascularization occurred, both of which were in the early in-hospital period (Table 2).
|
Quantitative Coronary Angiography and IVUS Analysis
Quantitative coronary angiography data are shown in Table 3. Twenty-month in-stent minimum lumen diameter (2.74±0.41 mm) and percent DS (3±13%) remained unchanged compared with 6-month follow-up data (2.69±0.30 mm and 11±8%, respectively; P=NS). Representative sequences of angiograms from a single patient are shown in Figure 1.
|
|
IVUS analysis demonstrated persistent inhibition of NIH at long-term follow-up (Table 4). FIM study data from Sao Paulo cohort are also shown in Table 4. Between the 6- and 20-month follow-ups, a small change in NIH (1.4±1.6 mm3 and 5.9±5.3 mm3, respectively) and in percent volume obstruction of the stent (1.1±1.2% and 4.4±3.1%, respectively) was observed. Only 1 patient reached 10% NIH of stent volume as shown by IVUS, which corresponded with an actual luminal loss of 0.29 mm at the 18-month follow-up (Figure 1). In addition, no significant change in lumen or vessel volume was observed in either proximal or distal edges of the stent (Figure 2). No late stent malapposition was detected.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, NIH assessed by IVUS at both 6 and 20 months was not substantially different from the 12-month follow-up data presented by Sousa et al3 (Table 3). In addition, the percent volume obstruction of the stent detected by volumetric IVUS in our study (4.4%) at 20-month follow-up is importantly less than those observed at 6-month follow-up in other trials (36% and 25%) using uncoated stents.12,13 Similarly, in-stent late loss and late loss index (LLI; 0.20 mm and 0.10, respectively) at a 20-month follow-up is markedly lower than with bare metal stents, in which late loss averages were 1.04 to 0.61 mm (LLI 0.59 to 0.39) at a 6-month12,13 and 0.46 mm (LLI 0.30) at a 36-month follow-up.14 Therefore, our findings provide considerable reassurance with regard to persistent inhibition of late restenosis or rebound hyperplasia, such as was previously observed with radioactive stents.8
In fact, minimal hyperplasia in humans up to 2 years after the procedure constitutes the first evidence that behavior in humans is at variance with the porcine model, where 90-day data actually demonstrate the recurrence of considerable NIH (Andrew J. Carter, unpublished data). For the first time in interventional cardiology, a new antirestenosis therapy performs better in humans than in the animal models.
Concern about potential late complications, such as late occlusion, thrombosis, late malapposition, aneurysm, and edge restenosis as reported in patients treated with brachytherapy,13 has not been observed in our patient population during up to 2 years of follow-up.
It has to be emphasized that short-term (8-week) antiplatelet therapy as used here and in the RAndomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL)15 provides adequate protection against subacute and late thrombotic occlusion. Nonetheless, generalization of these findings to treatment of long and complex lesions, total chronic occlusion, left main stem, etc, needs to be specifically evaluated in clinical trials.
The need for late target-vessel revascularization in 2 patients in lesions remote from the sirolimus stent again emphasizes the indolent nature of atherosclerosis in some patients. Although this study confirms that sirolimus-eluting stents constitute a major advance in restenosis prevention, the problem of atherosclerosis itself remains a considerable challenge.
Limitations
This is a small observational study and the results need to be confirmed by long-term follow-up in larger patient series. Lack of complete QCA and IVUS follow-up was unfortunate but was not prespecified in the study protocol. The virtual absence of NIH in the 10 patients studied at 20 months renders the data quite compelling because the remaining 4 patients were completely asymptomatic.
Conclusion
Sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stents demonstrated persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia and absence of restenosis in single de novo coronary lesions for up to 2 years of follow-up.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 6, 2002; revision received July 30, 2002; accepted August 5, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Rensing B, Vos J, Smits P, et al. Coronary restenosis elimination with a sirolimus eluting stent: first European human experience with six month angiographic and intravascular ultrasonic follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 21252130.
3. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid AC, et al. Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation. 2001; 104: 20072011.
4. Suzuki T, Kopia G, Hayashi S, et al. Stent-based delivery of sirolimus reduces neointimal formation in a porcine coronary model. Circulation. 2001; 104: 11881193.
5. Costa MA, Sabate M, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Late coronary occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy. Circulation. 1999; 100: 789792.
6. Kozuma K, Costa MA, Sabate M, et al. Late stent malapposition occurring after intracoronary beta-irradiation detected by intravascular ultrasound. J Invasive Cardiol. 1999; 11: 651655.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Albiero R, Nishida T, Adamian M, et al. Edge restenosis after implantation of high activity (32)P radioactive beta-emitting stents. Circulation. 2000; 101: 24542457.
8. Kay IP, Wardeh AJ, Kozuma K, et al. Radioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1417.
9. Hamers R, Bruining N, Knook M, et al. A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Comput Cardiol. 2001; 28: 589592.
10. Serruys PW, Regar E, Carter AJ. Rapamycin eluting stent: the onset of a new era in interventional cardiology. Heart. 2002; 87: 305307.
11. Teirstein PS. Living the dream of no restenosis. Circulation. 2001; 104: 19961998.
12. Acute platelet inhibition with abciximab does not reduce in-stent restenosis (ERASER study). The ERASER Investigators. Circulation. 1999; 100: 799806.
13. Serruys PW, Foley DP, Pieper M, et al. The TRAPIST Study: a multicentre randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of trapidil for prevention of restenosis after coronary stenting, measured by 3-D intravascular ultrasound. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 19381947.
14. Kimura T, Yokoi H, Yoshihisa N, et al. Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 561566.
15. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. The RAVEL trial. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 17731780.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Barlis, E. Regar, P. W. Serruys, K. Dimopoulos, W. J. van der Giessen, R.-J. M. van Geuns, G. Ferrante, S. Wandel, S. Windecker, G.-A. van Es, et al. An optical coherence tomography study of a biodegradable vs. durable polymer-coated limus-eluting stent: a LEADERS trial sub-study Eur. Heart J., November 4, 2009; (2009) ehp480v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Awata, J.-i. Kotani, M. Uematsu, T. Morozumi, T. Watanabe, T. Onishi, O. Iida, F. Sera, S. Nanto, M. Hori, et al. Serial Angioscopic Evidence of Incomplete Neointimal Coverage After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison With Bare-Metal Stents Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 910 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A N Seale, P E F Daubeney, A G Magee, and M L Rigby Pulmonary vein stenosis: initial experience with cutting balloon angioplasty Heart, June 1, 2006; 92(6): 815 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T.L. Ong, R. T. van Domburg, J. Aoki, K. Sonnenschein, P. A. Lemos, and P. W. Serruys Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Remain Superior to Bare-Metal Stents at Two Years: Medium-Term Results From the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1356 - 1360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Alvarez Jr and N. K. Kapur Drug Eluting Stent Technology: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment and Prevention of Restenosis Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2005; 18(6): 461 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Sianos, A Hoye, F Saia, W van der Giessen, P Lemos, P J de Feyter, P C Levendag, R van Domburg, and P W Serruys Long term outcome after intracoronary {beta} radiation therapy Heart, July 1, 2005; 91(7): 942 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fajadet, M.-C. Morice, C. Bode, P. Barragan, P. W. Serruys, W. Wijns, C. R. Constantini, J.-L. Guermonprez, H. Eltchaninoff, D. Blanchard, et al. Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit With Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Three-Year Results of the RAVEL Trial Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): 1040 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lindenfeld, G. G. Miller, S. F. Shakar, R. Zolty, B. D. Lowes, E. E. Wolfel, L. Mestroni, R. L. Page II, and J. Kobashigawa Drug Therapy in the Heart Transplant Recipient: Part II: Immunosuppressive Drugs Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): 3858 - 3865. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Popma, M. B. Leon, J. W. Moses, D. R. Holmes Jr, N. Cox, M. Fitzpatrick, J. Douglas, C. Lambert, M. Mooney, S. Yakubov, et al. Quantitative Assessment of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Native Coronary Arteries Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): 3773 - 3780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Murphy, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1861 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Waksman, A. E. Ajani, A. D. Pichard, R. Torguson, E. Pinnow, D. Canos, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, P. Kuchulakanti, C. Pappas, et al. Oral rapamycin to inhibit restenosis after stenting of de novo coronary lesions: The Oral Rapamune to Inhibit Restenosis (ORBIT) study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1386 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Saia, P A Lemos, C A Arampatzis, A Hoye, M Degertekin, K Tanabe, G Sianos, P C Smits, W J van der Giessen, P J de Feyter, et al. Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: insights from the rapamycin eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital (RESEARCH) registry Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1183 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Di Mario and G Mikhail Treating multivessel disease in the era of coated stents: introduction Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 989 - 989. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P W Serruys, P A Lemos, and B A van Hout Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for patients with multivessel disease: rationale for the arterial revascularisation therapies study part II (ARTS II) Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 995 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vogt, A. Stein, G. Rettemeier, N. Krott, R. Hoffmann, J. v. Dahl, A.-K. Bosserhoff, W. Michaeli, P. Hanrath, C. Weber, et al. Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1330 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hoye, K. Tanabe, P. A. Lemos, J. Aoki, F. Saia, C. Arampatzis, M. Degertekin, S. H. Hofma, G. Sianos, E. McFadden, et al. Significant reduction in restenosis after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1954 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Powell, C. S. Rihal, M. R. Bell, K. J. Zehr, and D. R. Holmes Jr Anticipated Impact of Drug-Eluting Stents on Referral Patterns for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Population-Based Angiographic Analysis Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2004; 79(6): 769 - 772. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Mourani, P. J. Garl, J. M. Wenzlau, T. C. Carpenter, K. R. Stenmark, and M. C.M. Weiser-Evans Unique, Highly Proliferative Growth Phenotype Expressed by Embryonic and Neointimal Smooth Muscle Cells Is Driven by Constitutive Akt, mTOR, and p70S6K Signaling and Is Actively Repressed by PTEN Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1299 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Curcio, D. Torella, G. Cuda, C. Coppola, M. C. Faniello, F. Achille, V. G. Russo, M. Chiariello, and C. Indolfi Effect of stent coating alone on in vitro vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and apoptosis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H902 - H908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, M. E. Russell, G. Guagliumi, J. Webb, J. Hamburger, W. Rutsch, C. Kaiser, R. Whitbourn, et al. Vascular Responses at Proximal and Distal Edges of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis From the TAXUS II Trial Circulation, February 10, 2004; 109(5): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, P. W. Serruys, R. T. van Domburg, F. Saia, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, J. Daemen, T. K.K. Liu, et al. Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the "Real World": The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Degertekin, P. A. Lemos, C. H. Lee, K. Tanabe, J.E. Sousa, A. Abizaid, E. Regar, G. Sianos, W. J. van der Giessen, P. J. de Feyter, et al. Intravascular ultrasound evaluation after sirolimus eluting stent implantation for de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 32 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Bhatia, R Bhatia, and M Dhindsa Drug-eluting stents: new era and new concerns Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 80(939): 13 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Saia, P. A. Lemos, C.-H. Lee, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, G. Sianos, P. C. Smits, E. McFadden, et al. Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Clinical and Angiographic Study Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1927 - 1929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Edelman and H. D. Danenberg Rapamycin for Cardiac Transplant Rejection and Vasculopathy: One Stone, Two Birds? Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 6 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, P. W. Serruys, and J. E. Sousa Drug-Eluting Stents: Cost Versus Clinical Benefit Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3003 - 3007. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. O'Neill and M. B. Leon Drug-Eluting Stents: Costs Versus Clinical Benefit Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3008 - 3011. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, C.-h. Lee, M. Degertekin, F. Saia, K. Tanabe, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. van Duuren, G. Sianos, P. C. Smits, et al. Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2093 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Paszkowiak and A. Dardik Arterial Wall Shear Stress: Observations from the Bench to the Bedside Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2003; 37(1): 47 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Levy and J. A.S. Muldowney 3rd Microarray Analysis of Neointima: Flowing Toward a Clear Future Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2002; 22(12): 1946 - 1947. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mozes and P. Gloviczki Adjuvant Therapy in Lower Extremity Revascularization: Prevention of Early and Intermediate Failures Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2002; 15(2): 161 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |