Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:I-33-I-39
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000032873.55215.4c
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timek, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Timek, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.

(Circulation. 2002;106:I-33.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Will a Partial Posterior Annuloplasty Ring Prevent Acute Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation?

Tomasz A. Timek, MD; Paul Dagum, MD, PhD; David T. Lai, FRACS; Frederick Tibayan, MD; David Liang, MD, PhD; George T. Daughters, MS; Motoya Hayase, MD; Neil B. Ingels, Jr, PhD; D. Craig Miller, MD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (T.A.T., P.D., D.T.L., F.T., G.T.D., N.B.I, D.C.M.), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (D.L., M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif., and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology and Biophysics, Research Institute of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, Calif. (G.T.D., N.B.I.).

Correspondence to D. Craig Miller, MD, Falk Cardiovascular Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5407. E-mail dcm{at}stanford.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Background Acute posterolateral ischemia in sheep results in ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). While complete ring annuloplasty prevents acute IMR, partial annuloplasty rings may offer a more physiologic repair, but are untested in animal models of IMR.

Methods Radiopaque markers were placed on the LV, mitral annulus (MA), and leaflets in 13 sheep. Seven sheep served as controls, and 6 had a St. Jude Tailor partial flexible ring implanted (29 mm in 5, 31 mm in 1). After 8±1 day, the animals were studied with biplane videofluoroscopy and echocardiography before and during acute posterolateral LV ischemia (balloon occlusion of circumflex artery). Mitral annular area (MAA), septal-lateral annular diameter (SL), annular perimeters, and leaflet edge separation were calculated from 3-D marker coordinates.

Results The average degree of mitral regurgitation increased from 0.0±0.0 to 2.1±0.7 (P=0.0006) in the control group during acute ischemia but remained unchanged in the Tailor group (0.1±0.2 for both conditions). The change in MAA throughout the cardiac cycle before ischemia was 17±4% in control animals, but only 5±2% (P=0.0002) in the Tailor ring group. Unlike the control animals, there was no increase in MAA (5.4±0.8 and 5.5±0.7 cm2, respectively; p=NS) nor dilatation of the muscular annulus (6.2±0.3 and 6.2±0.4, respectively; p=NS) during ischemia with the Tailor ring. Mitral SL dimension increased slightly with ischemia (2.3±0.2 versus 2.2±0.2 cm, P=0.03). Although posterior leaflet motion was limited, as observed with complete rings, normal annular flexion was maintained with the Tailor ring before and during acute ischemia.

Conclusions The Tailor partial annuloplasty ring prevented acute IMR probably by limiting SL diameter dilatation during acute ischemia. In this animal model of acute IMR, a partial, flexible posterior annuloplasty ring is as effective as a complete ring.


Key Words: ischemia • mitral valve • regurgitation • valvuloplasty


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Mitral valve repair has become the operation of choice for mitral insufficiency of various etiologies.13 Although more studies are still needed, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting the superiority of mitral repair over replacement in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).47 In most cases, valve repair for IMR consists solely of mitral annular reduction using a complete annuloplasty ring.89,10 Complete semi-rigid and flexible annuloplasty rings prevent mitral insufficiency in ovine models of acute posterolateral left ventricular (LV) ischemia.11 Complete annuloplasty rings, however, abolish normal mitral annular dynamics and perturb posterior leaflet motion.1214

Cosgrove and colleagues introduced a partial flexible annuloplasty band that offers annular size reduction yet appears to preserve normal annular dynamics.15,16 A similar partial annuloplasty ring, the Tailor partial flexible annuloplasty band, preserved normal annular flexion in experimental ovine experiments, although mitral annular area was fixed during the cardiac cycle.17

As annular dilatation and displacement primarily of the posterior annulus are associated with ischemic mitral regurgitation,1820 partial posterior ring annuloplasty may offer a simpler and more physiologic repair. Although partial ring annuloplasty has been used in patients with IMR,15,21 its efficacy in models of acute LV ischemia has not been assessed. Therefore, we investigated a partial posterior flexible annuloplasty ring in an acute model of LV ischemia in sheep. This current study extends the observations of our previous report17 to include the response to acute posterolateral LV ischemia.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Surgical Preparation
Thirteen adult sheep were used in the study. The operative procedure for marker implantation has been described previously in detail.22 The markers were implanted on the left ventricle, around the mitral annulus, and on the central meridian of each leaflet as shown in Figure 1. On cardiopulmonary bypass via a left atriotomy, the mitral valve was sized using both the distance between the fibrous trigones and the area of the anterior leaflet, and an appropriately sized Tailor ring was implanted (5 animals received a 29 mm ring, and 1 a 31 mm ring) using 8 to 10 interrupted horizontal mattress sutures of 2-0 braided Dacron.17 A micromanometer pressure transducer (PA4.5-X6; Konigsberg Instruments, Inc, Pasadena, CA) was placed in the LV chamber through the apex, and pneumatic occluders were placed around the superior and inferior vena cava after the animals were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. Seven animals underwent marker implantation only and served as a control group. The annular and leaflet dynamics in this historical control group have been reported.20 All animals were recovered in the experimental animal cardiac surgical intensive-care unit, and myocardial marker studies were performed after a 7 to 10 day recovery period.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Array of ventricular (dark circles), annular (light circles), and leaflet (squares) markers used in the study. AML=anterior mitral leaflet; PML=posterior mitral leaflet.

Data Acquisition
The animals were studied during closed-chest conditions, sedated with ketamine and diazepam, intubated and mechanically ventilated (veterinary anesthesia ventilator 2000, Hallowell EMC) with 100% oxygen. Esmolol (20 to 50 µg/kg/min) and atropine sulfate (0.01 mg/kg/min) intravenous infusions were utilized to minimize reflex sympathetic and parasympathetic responses. Left circumflex coronary balloon occlusion (distal to the first obtuse marginal artery) to produce posterolateral LV ischemia was carried out.20 Simultaneous biplane videofluoroscopy and hemodynamic data recordings were obtained during steady-state conditions and over a range of LV filling volumes during abrupt preload reduction using vena caval occluders. Data recordings were acquired before and after balloon circumflex occlusion. Resultant IMR was graded subjectively by an experienced echocardiographer (D. Liang) according to the extent and width of the regurgitant jet and categorized as none (0), mild (+1), moderate (+2), moderate to severe (+3), or severe (+4).

All animals received humane care in compliance with the "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the "Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health (DHEW NIHG publication 85 to 23, revised 1985). This study was approved by the Stanford Medical Center Laboratory Research Animal Review committee and conducted according to Stanford University policy.

A Philips Optimus 2000 biplane Lateral ARC 2/poly DIAGNOST C2 system (Philips Medical Systems, North America Company) was used to record videofluoroscopic data at 60 Hz with the image intensifiers in the 9-inch mode. Two-dimensional images from each of the 2 x-ray views (45° right anterior oblique and 45° left anterior oblique) were digitized and then merged to yield 3-D coordinates for each marker every 16.7 ms.23 LV pressure, aortic pressure, and ECG voltage were digitized and recorded simultaneously.

Data Analysis
End-systole was defined as the videofluoroscopic frame preceding maximum negative dP/dt (-dP/dtmax); end-diastole was defined as the videofluoroscopic frame containing the peak of the ECG R-wave. An instantaneous estimate of LV volume was calculated every 16.7 msec from the epicardial LV markers using a multiple tetrahedral model reconstructed from the marker coordinates.24 External LV pressure-volume stroke work (SW) was calculated as the integral of LV pressure (P) on volume (V) over a cardiac cycle for several beats at baseline and during caval occlusion as: Down


Preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) was computed by linear regression of SW on EDV as: Down


Where MW and VW are the slope and volume axis intercept, respectively. Adequate volume occlusion for PRSW calculations was obtained in 6 animals for the control and 4 animals in the Tailor groups.

Mitral Annular Geometry
Mitral annular area, perimeters, and dimensions where computed from the 3-D marker coordinates without assuming circular or planar geometry. Mitral annular area was calculated by first determining the centroid of the annular markers and then dividing the annulus into 8 triangular areas which were summed to yield the total annular area. The septal-lateral (SL) diameter of the annulus was calculated as the distance in 3-D space between the 2 markers placed in the middle of the septal and lateral mitral annulus, respectively (#1 and #5, Figure 2). The commissure-commissure (CC) diameter was calculated as the distance between the 2 annular commissural markers (#3 and #7, Figure 2). The muscular annular perimeter was computed as the sum of the 6 contiguous mitral annular segment lengths enclosed between markers #2 and #8. The fibrous annular perimeter was computed from the sum of segment lengths enclosed between markers #1 and #2, and markers #1 and #8 with markers #2 and #8 representing the right and left fibrous trigones, respectively. Flexion of the anterior annulus was expressed as the change in elevation during systole of the "saddle horn" marker (#1) above the plane fitted to the posterior annular markers using least-squares estimation.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Array of radiopaque markers sutured around the mitral annulus. Markers #2 and #8 were sutured to the right and left fibrous trigones, respectively. The fibrous annulus is defined as the annulus enclosed between the 2 fibrous trigones, for example, subtended between markers #2 and #8. The muscular annulus is defined as the remaining annulus. SL=septal-lateral annular dimension; CC=commissure-commissure annular dimension.

Mitral Leaflet Dynamics
To assess leaflet mobility throughout the cardiac cycle, angular position of the anterior leaflet edge was calculated as the angle ({Theta}AML) between the line from the anterior leaflet edge marker to the "saddle horn" and the septal-lateral annular diameter. Posterior leaflet edge angular position ({Theta}PML) was calculated in similar fashion. Leaflet excursion was calculated from diastolic maximum to systolic minimum angle. Anterior and posterior leaflet lengths were measured as the sum of distances between adjacent markers placed on the central meridian of each leaflet. Leaflet edge separation was determined as the distance in 3-D space between the 2 edge markers on the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets with valve closure defined as the time at which this distance reached its minimum plateau. Because of loss of the marker on the anterior leaflet edge in some animals, leaflet separation distance was calculated in 5 control and 4 Tailor animals.

Statistical Analysis
All data are reported as mean plus or minus 1 standard deviation (±1 SD). Hemodynamic and marker-derived data from 2 to 3 consecutive steady state beats that were time-aligned at end-diastole, and data from these beats were averaged for each animal. The data were analyzed for 20 frames before and 20 frames after end-diastole. Data were compared using Student’s t test for paired comparisons.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamics
The animals in the Tailor group were larger than those in the control group (77±9 kg versus 63±9 kg; P=0.02); additionally, they had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (171±21 versus 94±18 minute; P=0.0001) and aortic cross clamp (117±17 versus 65±24 minute) times. Group mean hemodynamic parameters before and after induction of acute posterolateral LV ischemia in each group are shown in Table 1. Before ischemia, the 2 groups were comparable in all hemodynamic parameters except end-systolic volume was greater in the Tailor group and the control animals had a higher baseline LV dP/dt. Peak and end-systolic LV pressures decreased while LV end-systolic volume increased in both groups with proximal circumflex occlusion. Furthermore, preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW), a load independent index of LV function, fell a similar degree in both groups during circumflex occlusion suggesting an equivalent ischemic insult. During acute IMR, mitral regurgitation increased from none to moderate in the control group, but remained only trace in the Tailor group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Hemodynamics

Mitral Annular Dynamics
Group mean data for mitral annular area and SL and CC diameters as well as lengths of the fibrous and muscular portions of the mitral annulus are tabulated in Table 2 and shown in Figures 3 and 4. During acute posterolateral ischemia in the control group, the mitral annulus (particularly in the SL diameter) dilated substantially, and the length of the muscular portion of the annulus increased significantly. Conversely, during circumflex occlusion in the Tailor group, annular area did not change, and there was no appreciable increase in either the SL diameter or the muscular annular perimeter. Mitral annular area changed only slightly during the cardiac cycle before and during ischemia in the animals fitted with the partial flexible annuloplasty ring. Although annular area remained fixed in the Tailor group, flexion of the septal annulus, as shown in Figure 5, was similar in both groups before ischemia (1.9±0.9 and 1.5±0.3 mm for control and Tailor, respectively; P=0.4) and did not change during circumflex occlusion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Mitral Annular Geometry and Dynamics



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Group mean data for muscular annular perimeter (top panel), fibrous annular perimeter (middle panel), and total annular perimeter (bottom panel) throughout the cardiac cycle for control (left) and Tailor (right) groups before (closed symbols) and during (open symbols) acute posterolateral ischemia. A 650 ms time interval centered at end-diastole (t=0) is illustrated for both groups Error bars represent ±1 SEM.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Elevation of the "saddle horn" marker (#1, Figure 2) above a plane fitted to the posterior annular markers (#3- #7, Figure 2) throughout the cardiac cycle for control animals (top) and with posterior flexible Tailor ring annuloplasty (bottom) before (solid symbols) and during (open symbols) acute posterolateral ischemia. A 650 ms time interval centered at end-diastole (t=0) is illustrated for both groups.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Group mean data for mitral annular area (top panel), SL dimension (middle panel), and CC dimension (bottom panel) throughout the cardiac cycle for control (left) and Tailor (right) groups before (closed symbols) and during (open symbols) acute posterolateral ischemia. A 650 ms time interval centered at end-diastole (t=0) is illustrated for both groups. Error bars represent ±1 SEM.

Mitral Leaflet Dynamics
Group mean anterior and posterior leaflet edge angular positions during the cardiac cycle for both groups before ischemia are illustrated in Figure 6. Anterior leaflet excursion from minimum to maximum during the cardiac cycle was similar between the 2 groups (45±12 and 50±10 degrees for control and Tailor, respectively; P=0.5), posterior leaflet motion was severely limited in the Tailor group (38±3 versus 14±7 degrees; P=0.0001). Changes in leaflet excursion in both groups during ischemia along with valve closure times and lengths of the anterior and posterior leaflets at end-systole are summarized in Table 3.pick;0253t3;0;;;ZPICKFOOT;T3>During circumflex occlusion, posterior leaflet excursion decreased in control animals but did not change in the Tailor group. The observed mitral regurgitation in the control group was associated with delayed valve closure and early systolic leaflet "loitering" (Figure 7). In the Tailor group, although there was a trend toward later valve closure at baseline compared with the control group (P=0.054), delayed valve closure or leaflet "loitering" during acute posterolateral LV ischemia did not occur.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Group mean data for angular displacement of the anterior mitral leaflet (top panel) and posterior mitral leaflet (bottom panel) throughout the cardiac cycle for control (squares) and Tailor (circles) animals before induction of acute ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). Leaflet edge angular displacement was calculated with respect to the line between mid-septal and mid-lateral annulus. A 650 ms time window centered at end- diastole (t=0) is illustrated. Error bars represent ±1 SEM.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Leaflet Angular Motion, Closure Timing, and Lengths



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Leaflet edge separation throughout the cardiac cycle for control (top) and Tailor (bottom) groups before (closed symbols) and during (open symbols) acute posterolateral LV ischemia. A 650 ms time window centered at end-diastole (t=0) is illustrated. Error bars represent ±1 SEM.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Currently, ring annuloplasty represents the mainstay of surgical therapy in correcting ischemic mitral regurgitation810 although it is not universally effective.25 In prior experimental studies, complete flexible and semi-rigid annuloplasty rings were effective in preventing acute IMR,11 but ring implantation perturbed annular and leaflet dynamics.12,13 Recent reports have claimed preserved annular motion with a partial flexible posterior annuloplasty ring in human subjects15,16,26 hence offering hope for a more physiologic repair. The data in the current experiment demonstrated that the Tailor partial flexible annuloplasty ring was effective in preventing acute IMR in otherwise normal sheep hearts; no increase in annular septal-lateral dimension nor dilatation of the muscular annulus was observed. Unexpectedly, this partial ring also abolished normal mitral annular dynamics and partially restricted posterior leaflet motion, similar to what has previously been observed in sheep acute IMR models following implantation of complete rings.12,13

Previous studies demonstrated that complete ring annuloplasty abolished acute IMR by reducing the annular septal-lateral (or, in clinical jargon, "antero-posterior") dimension and prevented mitral leaflet "loitering"11 and perturbations of leaflet geometry.27 The Tailor ring effectively fixed annular size throughout the cardiac cycle and did not permit dilatation of the muscular annulus during acute ischemia. Consequently, no IMR was observed, and the mitral septal-lateral annular dimension increased only slightly; which is the main direction of annular enlargement during acute posterolateral LV ischemia.18,20 Although the Tailor ring is a partial ring, annular dilatation was not observed with circumflex occlusion because the fibrous annulus did not change: The dynamics of the fibrous annulus did not change throughout the cardiac cycle in either group, nor did they change during ischemia. Therefore, perhaps all that is needed in annular reduction procedures aimed at correcting IMR is reduction of the muscular annulus; however, caution must be exercised because dilatation of the fibrous annulus has actually been observed in certain circumstances, for example, patients with28 and experimental models of dilated cardiomyopathy.29 Avoiding circumferential reduction of the mitral annulus may be related to preserved flexion of the anterior annulus that we recently reported in animals with a Tailor ring, as such was not seen with a complete flexible ring;17 maintained annular flexion may play a role in reducing the likelihood of systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral leaflet which might cause postoperative LV outflow tract obstruction after ring annuloplasty.30 In the current experiment, annular flexion was also conserved with the Tailor ring during acute posterolateral LV ischemia.

Complete ring annuloplasty abolishes leaflet "loitering" and prevents delayed leaflet coaptation in models of acute ovine IMR.11 The current data suggest that the Tailor ring is equally effective in facilitating timely valve closure and preventing IMR during acute LV ischemia; however, annular reduction with the Tailor ring was also associated with restriction of posterior leaflet motion as found previously with complete rings.13,14 We believe that the observed "frozen" posterior mitral leaflet in the setting of mitral annuloplasty is related to reduction of annular area and altered geometric relationships between the posterior mitral annulus and the papillary muscle tips. As the reduction in annular area induced by the Tailor ring is comparable to that achieved with complete rings,12 this limited posterior leaflet motion may not be surprising. Additionally, "reefing" of the posterior leaflet by the annuloplasty band must also be considered and may be reflected in the baseline differences in posterior leaflet lengths between the 2 groups. Extension of the anterior leaflet during acute IMR has been described in control sheep during acute IMR in a prior report27 and attributed to papillary muscle "tethering". In animals with complete annuloplasty rings, systolic anterior leaflet length remained unchanged during acute ischemia, a finding corroborated by the current study. Thus, the Tailor partial flexible annuloplasty ring has essentially the same effects on mitral leaflet motion and geometry during acute LV ischemia in this model as do complete flexible and semi-rigid annuloplasty rings, except that annular flexion is preserved.


*    Summary
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Summary
down arrowReferences
 
Ring annuloplasty is frequently used in the surgical correction of ischemic mitral regurgitation,9,10 and partial flexible ring annuloplasty has been shown to be effective clinically in treating IMR.16,21 The current data support this practice as the Tailor partial flexible ring effectively prevented acute IMR in healthy sheep hearts. Surprisingly, as already described under non-ischemic conditions,17 the Tailor ring altered annular and leaflet in vivo dynamics during ischemia almost identically to that associated with use of complete annuloplasty rings. The Tailor ring prevented mitral annular dilatation, especially in the septal-lateral dimension, facilitated timely valve closure, and converted the mitral valve into a single-leaflet valve by "freezing" the motion of the posterior leaflet. Unlike complete flexible rings,17 however, the Tailor ring permitted normal annular flexion that was sustained during acute LV ischemia, but the physiologic importance of this annular flexion, if any, in a clinical setting needs further investigation.

Study Limitations
The results of the current study must be interpreted in the context of several limitations. This experimental design does not imitate clinical practice where prior ischemia or infarction is present and then is treated surgically with placement of a ring- in this study, an annuloplasty ring was implanted in a normal heart before the ischemic insult and therefore represented a "prophylactic" surgical correction that is distinctly different than the clinical situation. It is also important to emphasize that these findings can only be interpreted in the setting of acute LV ischemia in a normal sheep heart and should not be extrapolated directly to patients with chronic IMR where LV dilatation, sub-valvular geometric perturbations induced by previous infarction and ischemia, and LV remodeling may play a predominant role. This animal model also has other limitations in that sheep have a less well defined posterior annulus than do humans and more atrial tissue above and below the line of leaflet insertion;31 however, annular dynamics are similar in both humans and sheep.22,32 While the myocardial marker method requires suturing small metal markers to numerous intra-cardiac structures, previous echocardiographic studies show that the markers do not interfere with normal mitral annular or leaflet motion as they are very small (aggregate mass=20±6 mg). Although there were baseline differences in animal size and some hemodynamic parameters between the 2 groups, we believe that these differences did not contribute in an important way to the observed differences in annular and leaflet dynamics between the control sheep and the ring animals.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grants HL-29589 and HL-67025 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Drs Timek, Dagum, Tibayan, and Lai are Carl and Leah McConnell Cardiovascular Surgical Research Fellows. Dr Timek is a recipient of The Thoracic Surgery Foundation Research Fellowship Award. Drs Timek, Dagum, and Tibayan were also supported by NHLBI Individual Research Service Awards HL-10452, HL-10000, and HL-67563, respectively. Dr Lai was supported by a fellowship from the American Heart Association, Western States Affiliate. We appreciate the superb technical assistance provided by Mary K. Zasio, BA, Carol W. Mead, BA, and Maggie Brophy, AS.


*    Footnotes
 
Presented in part at the 74th Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Anaheim, California, November, 2001


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowSummary
*References
 
1. Smolens IAPF, Bolling SF. Mitral valve repair in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2000; 2: 365–371.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Reul RM, Cohn LH. Mitral valve reconstruction for mitral insufficiency. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997; 39: 567–599.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Yau TM E-GY, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, et al. Mitral valve repair and replacement for rheumatic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:53–60.

4. Rankin JS, Feneley MP, Hickey MS, et al. A clinical comparison of mitral valve repair versus valve replacement in ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988; 95: 165–177.[Abstract]

5. Replogle RL, Campbell CD. Surgery for mitral regurgitation associated with ischemic heart disease. Results and strategies. Circulation. 1989; 79: I122–I25.

6. Dion R. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: when and how should it be corrected? J Heart Valve Dis. 1993; 2: 536–543.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. David TE. Techniques and results of mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Card Surg. 1994; 9: 274–277.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Czer LS, Maurer G, Trento A, et al. Comparative efficacy of ring and suture annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1992; 86: II46–I52.

9. Cohn LH, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, et al. The effect of pathophysiology on the surgical treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation: operative and late risks of repair versus replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1995; 9: 568–754.[Abstract]

10. Grossi EA, Lapietra A, Galloway AC, et al. Late results of isolated mitral annuloplasty for ischemic mitral insufficiency. Circulation. 2000; 102: II-491 Abstract.

11. Timek T, Glasson JR, Dagum P, et al. Ring annuloplasty prevents delayed leaflet coaptation and mitral regurgitation during acute left ventricular ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 119: 774–783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Glasson JR, Green GR, Nistal JF, et al. Mitral annular size and shape in sheep with annuloplasty rings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 117: 302–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Green GR, Dagum P, Glasson JR, et al. Restricted posterior leaflet motion after mitral ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68: 2100–2106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Mast F, Schipperheyn JJ, et al. Comparison of rigid and flexible rings for annuloplasty of the porcine mitral valve. Circulation. 1990; 82: IV58–IV64.

15. Cosgrove DM, Arcidi JM, Rodriguez L, et al. Initial experience with the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60: 499–503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM, Shiota T, et al. Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System: midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69: 717–721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Dagum P, Timek T, Green GR, et al. Three-dimensional geometric comparison of partial and complete flexible mitral annuloplasty rings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122: 665–673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Kay GL, Kay JH, Zubiate P, et al. Mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation secondary to coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1986; 74: I88–98.

19. Gorman JH, Gorman RC, Jackson BM, et al. Distortions of the mitral valve in acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 64: 1026–1031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Glasson JR, Komeda M, Daughters GT, et al. Early systolic mitral leaflet "loitering" during acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 116: 193–205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Camilleri LF, Miguel B, Bailly P, et al. Flexible posterior mitral annuloplasty: five-year clinical and Doppler echocardiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 1692–1697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Glasson JR, Komeda M, Daughters GT, et al. Most ovine mitral annular 3-D size reduction occurs before ventricular systole and is abolished with ventricular pacing. Circulation. 1997; 96: II-115–II123.

23. Daughters GT, Sanders WJ, Miller DC, et al. A comparison of two analytical systems for 3-D reconstruction from biplane videoradiograms. IEEE Computers in Cardiology. 1989; 15: 79–82.

24. Moon MR, DeAnda A, Daughters GT, et al. Experimental evaluation of different chordal preservation methods during mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 58: 931–944.[Abstract]

25. Liel-Cohen N, Otsuji Y, Vlahakes GJ, et al. Functional ischemic mitral regurgitation can persist despite ring annuloplasty: mechanistic insights. Circulation. 1997;96:I-540. Abstract

26. Dall’Agata A, Taams MA, Fioretti PM, et al. Cosgrove-Edwards mitral ring dynamics measured with transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 65: 485–490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Lai DTM, Timek TA, Green GR, et al. The effects of ring annuloplasty on mitral leaflet geometry during acute left ventricular ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120: 966–975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Hueab AC, Jatene FB, Pomerantzeff PMA, et al. Mechanisms of mitral valve insufficiency and annular dilatation in dilated cardiomyopathy: anatomic study. 14th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery October 7–11, 2000, Frankfurt, Germany. Abstract.

29. Timek TA, Dagum P, Lai DT, et al. 3-D Mitral annular dynamics in tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:217A. Abstract

30. Dagum P, Green GR, Glasson JR, et al. Potential mechanism of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after mitral ring annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 117: 472–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Walmsley R. Anatomy of human mitral valve in adult cadaver and comparative anatomy of the valve. Br Heart J. 1978; 40: 351–66.[Free Full Text]

32. Ormiston JA, Shah PM, Tei C, et al. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in man. I. A two-dimensional echocardiographic method and findings in normal subjects. Circulation. 1981; 64: 113–120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timek, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Timek, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.