(Circulation. 2002;106:I-259.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Aortic and Peripheral Vascular Surgery |
in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Is Upregulated in Cystic Medial Degeneration of Annuloaortic Ectasia in Marfan Syndrome
From the Departments of Cardiology (Y.S., H.N., Y.A., K.U., A.S., H. Kasanuki), Cardiovascular Surgery (S.A., H. Kurosawa), and Pathology (T.N.), The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Womens Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to Yasunari Sakomura, MD, PhD, Heart Institute of Japan, Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Womens Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. E-mail msakomur{at}hij.twmu.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
), a transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily, has been reported to show antiproliferative effects on VSMCs as well as anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages. PPAR
agonist has been recently reported to induce apoptosis of cultured VSMCs.
Methods We examined the histopathology of ascending aortas in AAE of Marfan patients (n=21) and control patients (n=6) at surgery. RT-PCR was performed to demonstrate expression of PPAR
in CMD. Localization of PPAR
was determined by double immunostaining using antibodies against PPAR
and cell-specific markers (ie, SMCs, macrophages, and T lymphocytes).
Results PPAR
expression was upregulated in AAE samples but minimal in control samples by RT-PCR (P=0.07). Immunoreactivity against PPAR
in numerous nuclei of VSMCs was observed in CMD lesions. Severity of CMD correlated with positive immunoreactivity of PPAR
in medial VSMCs (P=0.03). No inflammatory cells (ie, macrophages or T lymphocytes) were detected in CMD lesions.
Conclusion PPAR
expression is upregulated in SMCs of CMD without any inflammatory response. Activated PPAR
in VSMCs might be involved in the pathogenesis of CMD in Marfans aortas. Regulation of PPAR
might lead to clinical implication in protection against progression of AAE.
Key Words: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
vascular smooth muscle cell Marfan syndrome
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apoptosis and loss of VSMCs is one of the features of CMD,3,4 but little is known about its pathogenesis. It is widely accepted that apoptosis is a major mechanism for the control of cell number in developing and mature tissues under physiological and pathological conditions.5 Vascular remodeling in the process of angiogenesis and during vascular diseases is thought to involve apoptosis of VSMCs. Some reports have suggested that apoptosis may play an important role in the pathogenesis of aortic dilatation in patients with Marfans syndrome and in congenital aortic diseases.6
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
), a transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily, has been reported to show antiproliferative7,8 and antimigratory effects on VSMCs9 as well as anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages (M
s).10 PPAR
agonist has been recently reported to induce apoptosis of cultured VSMCs11 and attenuate the development of intimal hyperplasia in animal models of balloon catheterinduced vascular injury.12
In this study, we examined whether expression of PPAR
in VSMCs is upregulated in CMD of AAE in Marfan syndrome. We demonstrate that aortic tissue samples obtained from Marfan patients express PPAR
in VSMCs, which correlates with the degree of CMD. We discuss its implication in Marfans aorta.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histological Examination
Paraformaldehyde-fixed aortas of 21 AAE and 6 control patients were processed for light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. In addition to hematoxylin and eosin staining, Alcian-blue staining for detection of acidic mucopolysaccharides (MPS) deposition, Victoria-blue staining for evaluation of fragmented elastic layers, and Massons trichrome staining for fibrosis were performed and scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points according to the severity of each finding (grading for MPS deposition: 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, 1 cystic lesion; and 4, more than 2 cystic lesions; grading for elastic layer fragmentation: 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, less than 1/2 medial layer; and 4, more than 1/2 medial layer; grading for fibrosis: 1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, focal fibrosis in less than 1/2 medial layer, and 4, focal fibrosis more than 1/2 medial layer). The total score was summated as the CMD score to assess the degree of CMD.
Immunohistochemical Analysis
Nuclear localization of PPAR
was determined by immunostaining with monoclonal antibody against PPAR
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc) by using an LSAB kit (Dako Japan Co Ltd.). VSMCs were identified by immunoreactivity for mature form of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain antibody (SM1; donated by Dr Ryozo Nagai, Tokyo University, Tokyo). CD68 (clone KP-1, Dako Co.) and CD45RO (clone UCHL-1, Dako Co.) were immunostained for detection of M
s and T lymphocytes, respectively. The reaction was visualized with deaminobenzidine, and nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. To determine the proportion of PPAR
-positive VSMCs for each sample, the total number of SM1-positive cells in the aortic media was counted for each section. Six fields per section were examined at X200 magnification, and measurements were performed independently by 2 investigators. Their observations were averaged. The investigators performing histological evaluation were blinded to the clinical data.
Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Media of aortic tissues from 8 Marfan and 3 control patients were separated from both intima and adventitia to avoid contamination of endothelium and fatty tissue. Total RNA from these tissues was isolated by the single-step guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method by using RNAzol (TelTest, Friendswood, Tex). RT-PCR was performed to demonstrate expression of PPAR
in CMD. Two micrograms of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with 1U/mL of reverse transcriptase (Superscript, Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md) at 37 °C for 1 hour in standard buffer. The PCR reaction was carried out with Ready To Go PCR beading (Pharmacia Biotech). For the amplification of human PPAR
cDNA, 2 primers (5'-AAC TGC GGG GAA ACT TGG GAG ATT CTC C-3' and 5'- AAT AAT AAG GTG GAG ATG CAG GCT CC-3') were used. The DNA fragments of human PPAR
cDNA (351 bp) and ms16 (a housekeeping gene as internal control: 103 bp) were amplified with the oligonucleotide primers as described previously.14,15 The PCR products were run on 2.0% agarose gels.
Statistical Analysis
Analyses were performed with the SAS System 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The data were presented as frequency or means± SEM. Chi-square test or Fishers exact probability test was applied for dichotomous data. Students t test or Welchs t test was used for continuous data. The F test was used for homogeneity of variance testing.
Spearman correlation coefficients (2-tailed) were used to evaluate the correlation between the CMD score and the percentage of PPAR
-positive VSMCs and between aortic diameter and relative PPAR
mRNA expression. Two-tailed P values<0.05 were considered statistically significant. >
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Expression of PPAR
in Marfans Aortas
RT-PCR showed that PPAR
expression was upregulated in half of the AAE samples obtained from Marfan patients but minimal in 3 control samples (Figure 3A and B). Immunoreactivity against PPAR
in numerous nuclei of medial VSMCs was observed in CMD lesions (Figure 1C). The percentage of PPAR
-positive VSMCs was significantly higher in Marfans aortas than control aortas (21.3±2.7% versus 3.3±0.8%; P<0.001; Figure 4A).
|
|
Severity of CMD, Aortic Dilatation, and PPAR
Expression
PPAR
expression estimated by RT-PCR showed association with maximum diameter of the ascending aorta (P=0.07; Figure 3A and B). The percentage of PPAR
-positive medial SMCs correlated with the severity of CMD (P=0.03) and with maximum aortic diameter (P=0.06; Figure 4B and C).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
might influence macrophage-dependent events in the development of atherosclerosis associated with inflammation.16,17 PPAR
was expressed not only in normal human monocytes but also in foam cells and atherosclerotic plaques. Natural and synthetic PPAR
ligands were demonstrated to inhibit expression of proinflammatory genes and to have an anti-atherogenic effect in the vessel wall.16 Several reports have shown that PPAR
is expressed in cultured VSMCs18,8 and in rat neointima after balloon injury.19 This study provides the first documentation of the expression of PPAR
in aneurysms of Marfans aorta with pathological CMD. Upregulation of PPAR
expression is associated with severity of CMD and with increase of aortic diameter, suggesting that PPAR
expression in medial VSMCs might be based on pathogenesis of CMD and disease progression of Marfans aorta. Moreover, immunohistochemical analysis of cell components revealed that there was no inflammatory cell in CMD lesion. PPAR
expression in the CMD of Marfans aorta was not associated with inflammation, which is unique pathology.
What is the pathophysiological role of PPAR
in aortic aneurysm with Marfan syndrome? Dedifferentiation of VSMCs is an important phenotypic change during the progression of athrosclerosis, restenosis,20 and aneurysm formation.21,22 Bunton et al have previously reported that fibrillin-1-deficient mouse, a mouse model of Marfan syndrome, showed phenotypic alteration of medial VSMCs preceding elastolysis.23 Segura et al have shown expression of matrix methalloproteinases in VSMCs in thoracic aortic aneurysms with Marfan syndrome that causes fragmentation of medial elastic layers.24 Elastolysis induced by matrix metalloproteinases is one important feature in pathology of Marfan patients. These investigators suggest phenotypic change of medial VSMCs to the activated phenotype might have a pivotal role in aorta of Marfan syndrome. Upregulation of PPAR
in VSMCs might thus be involved in the pathogenesis of CMD via the activated phenotype of medial SMCs in Marfans aortas. PPAR
agonists such as troglitazone and pioglitazone inhibit proliferation and matrix metalloproteinase expression in cultured VSMCs.8 PPAR
agonists also inhibit intimal VSMC growth in the balloon-injury animal model7,25 Although the pathophysiological significance of PPAR
expression in VSMCs of Marfans aorta without any inflammatory response is unclear, we speculate that PPAR
may act to counterbalance activation and proliferation of VSMCs.
We have previously reported acceleration of VSMC apoptosis in Marfans aorta3 and that this might be involved in the progression of pathogenesis in aortic dilatation. Aizawa et al have shown that the PPAR
agonist pioglitazone induces apoptosis in cultured VSMCs in a nitric oxide-dependent manner by cytokine activation, and reduces intimal hyperplasia in a rat balloon-injured model by enhancing VSMC apoptosis.12 Although evidence for a direct causal relationship between PPAR
and its ligand was not demonstrated, pioglitazone was a potent inducer of apoptosis in vascular lesions. In aortic aneurysm with Marfan syndrome, VSMC apoptosis may play a substantial role in progression of aortic disease and formation of CMD via PPAR
activation.
One question that remains is whether PPAR
is a primary or secondary component of CMD formation in Marfan syndrome. CMD is also observed in congenital aortic disease,1 atherosclerosis, and aging.2 We examined aortas in the size-matched non-Marfans AAE patients, ie, coarctation of aorta and atherosclerosis at graft operation. We could find CMD in these patients. PPAR
expression could be demonstrated in these patients by immunohistochemical and RT-PCR methods (data not shown). So we suppose that the expression of PPAR
is associated with aneurysm formation with CMD because of various causes and not unique phenomena in Marfans syndrome. Further studies are required to characterize the importance of PPAR
within CMD. If this is clarified, regulation of PPAR
might lead to the clinical implication of protection against progression in AAE with Marfans syndrome.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
was upregulated in VSMCs of Marfans aortas with CMD and associated with severity of CMD and increasing aortic diameter. Our results suggest that PPAR
expression might reflect pathogenesis of CMD and disease progression of Marfans aorta without any inflammatory response. | Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fleischer KJ, Nousari HC, Anhalt GJ, et al. Immunohistochemical abnormalities of fibrillin in cardiovascular tissues in Marfans syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63: 10121017.
3. Sakomura Y, Yoshioka-Koganei S, Aomi S, et al. Apoptosis of medial smooth muscle cells in dilated ascending aortas of patients with Marfans syndrome and annuloaortic ectasia. Circulation. 1997; 96 (suppl I): I-126. Abstract.
4. Ihling C, Szombathy T, Nampoothiri K, et al. Cystic medial degeneration of the aorta is associated with p53 accumulation, Bax upregulation, apoptotic cell death, and cell proliferation. Heart. 1999; 82: 286293.
5. Isner JM, Kearney M, Bortman S, et al. Apoptosis in human atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circulation. 1995; 91: 27032711.
6. Bonderman D, Gharehbaghi-Schnell E, Wollenek G, et al. Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. Circulation. 1999; 99: 21382143.
7. Law RE, Meehan WP, Xi XP, et al. Troglitazone inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and intimal hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 18971905.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Marx N, Schonbeck U, Lazar MA, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators inhibit gene expression and migration in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 10971103.
9. Benson S, Wu J, Padmanabhan S, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells: inhibition of growth, migration, and c-fos expression by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma activator troglitazone. Am J Hypertens. 2000; 13: 7482.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, et al. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature. 1998; 391: 7982.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Okura T, Nakamura M, Takata Y, et al. Troglitazone induces apoptosis via the p53 and Gadd45 pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000; 407: 227235.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Aizawa Y, Kawabe J, Hasebe N, et al. Pioglitazone enhances cytokine-induced apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells and reduces intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001; 104: 455460.
13. De Paepe A, Devereux RB, Dietz HC, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1996; 62: 417426.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Vidal-Puig AJ, Considine RV, Jimenez-Linan M, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene expression in human tissues. Effects of obesity, weight loss, and regulation by insulin and glucocorticoids. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 24162422.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Leonard MW, Lim KC, Engel JD. Expression of the chicken GATA factor family during early erythroid development and differentiation. Development. 1993; 119: 519531.[Abstract]
16. Ricote M, Huang J, Fajas L, et al. Expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) in human atherosclerosis and regulation in macrophages by colony stimulating factors and oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 76147619.
17. Nagy L, Tontonoz P, Alvarez JG, et al. Oxidized LDL regulates macrophage gene expression through ligand activation of PPARgamma. Cell. 1998; 93: 229240.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Iijima K, Yoshizumi M, Ako J, et al. Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 247: 353356.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Law RE, Goetze S, Xi XP, et al. Expression and function of PPARgamma in rat and human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 2000; 101: 13111318.
20. Bochaton-Piallat ML, Ropraz P, Gabbiani F, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity of rat arterial smooth muscle cell clones: implications for the development of experimental intimal thickening. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996; 16: 815820.
21. Kamijima T, Isobe M, Suzuki J, et al. Enhanced embryonic nonmuscle myosin heavy chain isoform and matrix metalloproteinase expression in aortic abdominal aneurysm with rapid progression. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1999; 8: 291295.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Lesauskaite V, Tanganelli P, Sassi C, et al. Smooth muscle cells of the media in the dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta: morphology, immunoreactivity for osteopontin, matrix metalloproteinases, and their inhibitors. Hum Pathol. 2001; 32: 10031011.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Bunton TE, Biery NJ, Myers L, et al. Phenotypic alteration of vascular smooth muscle cells precedes elastolysis in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 3743.
24. Segura AM, Luna RE, Horiba K, et al. Immunohistochemistry of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in thoracic aortic aneurysms and aortic valves of patients with Marfans syndrome. Circulation. 1998;98:II331II337; discussion II337II338.
25. Igarashi M, Takeda Y, Ishibashi N, et al. Pioglitazone reduces smooth muscle cell density of rat carotid arterial intima induced by balloon catheterization. Horm Metab Res. 1997; 29: 444449.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |