Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:I-14-I-18
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000032911.33237.67
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roelandt, J. R. T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roelandt, J. R. T. C.

(Circulation. 2002;106:I-14.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Coronary Heart Disease

Perfusion and Contractile Reserve in Chronic Dysfunctional Myocardium: Relation to Functional Outcome After Surgical Revascularization

Jeroen J. Bax, MD; Don Poldermans, MD; Arend F. L. Schinkel, MD; Eric Boersma, MSc; Abdou Elhendy, MD; Alexander Maat, MD; Roelf Valkema, MD; Eric P. Krenning, MD; Jos R. T. C. Roelandt, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.), and the Departments of Cardiology (D.P., A.F.L.S., A.E., J.R.T.C.R.), Epidemiology and Statistics (E.B.), Thoracic Surgery (A.M.), and Nuclear Medicine (R.V., E.P.K.), ThoraxCenter Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Jeroen J Bax, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail jbax{at}knoware.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Background Chronic dysfunctional but viable myocardium may exhibit contractile reserve and/or intact perfusion. Segments with intact perfusion without contractile reserve are frequently observed inpatients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The clinical relevance of this observation is unclear; in particular, the functional outcome after revascularization is unknown. Thus, contractile reserve (using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) and perfusion (using resting 99mTc tetrofosmin) were evaluated in 114 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and the findings were related to functional outcome (9 to 12 months after revascularization).

Methods and Results Patients (n=114) with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing surgical revascularization were evaluated for perfusion (using 99mTc tetrofosmin) and contractile reserve (using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography). Contractile function (two-dimensional echocardiography) was assessed before and 9 to 12 months after revascularization. In the 1 336 dysfunctional segments, perfusion was preserved in 51% of the segments and contractile reserve in 31% (P<.05); 47% of the segments with perfusion did not exhibit contractile reserve. The majority (66%) of segments with recovery of function postrevascularization had intact perfusion and contractile reserve; the majority (58%) of segments without functional recovery lacked both perfusion and contractile reserve. Interestingly, 22% of segments with functional recovery and 25% of segments without functional recovery showed intact perfusion without contractile reserve.

Conclusion Segments with intact perfusion/contractile reserve have a high likelihood of recovery of function postrevascularization; segments without contractile reserve/perfusion have a low likelihood of recovery and segments with intact perfusion without contractile reserve have an intermediate likelihood of recovery.


Key Words: myocardial viability • hibernating myocardium • heart failure • perfusion • contractile reserve


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
In patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, improvement of contractile function and favorable long-term prognosis after surgical revascularization have been demonstrated in those patients with dysfunctional but viable myocardium.16 Different techniques are available for the assessment of viable myocardium, based on the detection of different characteristics of viable myocardium.16 These characteristics include preserved glucose metabolism, intact cell membrane and mitochondria, preserved perfusion, and the presence of contractile reserve.16 The first 4 characteristics can be evaluated by nuclear imaging techniques: Glucose metabolism can be evaluated by F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging,7,8 intact cell membranes can be evaluated by 201Tl imaging,9 intact mitochondria can be assessed by 99mTc sestamibi imaging,10 and preserved perfusion can be evaluated by either imaging with thallium-201 or 99mTc-labeled tracers.9,10 The presence of contractile reserve can be assessed during the infusion of low-dose dobutamine using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging.16 However, dysfunctional but viable myocardium does not always exhibit all characteristics. In particular, in a substantial percentage (approximately 25%) of the patients contractile reserve appeared absent, although other markers of viability (glucose metabolism, intact cell membrane, perfusion) were still present.11,12 The precise clinical relevance of this observation is thus far unclear and remains a matter of debate;13 in particular, the functional outcome after revascularization of these patients is uncertain. To further evaluate this phenomenon, we assessed contractile reserve (using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) and perfusion (using resting 99mTc tetrofosmin) in a large group of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy; the findings were subsequently related to functional outcome, assessed 9 to 12 months after revascularization.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
The study population existed of 114 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were already scheduled for surgical revascularization. All patients presented with symptoms of heart failure whereas 38% of the patients had accompanying angina pectoris. Indications for surgery were heart failure in all (New York Heart Association [NYHA] score 3.2±0.8), together with angina in 38% (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] score 2.7±0.4). The decision for revascularization was based on clinical grounds (symptoms, presence/absence of ischemia, angiographic findings).

Additional characteristics are presented in Table 1. All patients were stable during the study. Patients with severe mitral regurgitation were not included. Each patient gave informed consent to the study protocol that was approved by the local Ethics Committee.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patient Characteristics (n=114)

Study Protocol
At the entrance of the study, the patients underwent radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) to assess LV ejection fraction (LVEF), resting 2D echocardiography to identify regional contractile dysfunction, low-dose dobutamine echocardiography to assess contractile reserve in dysfunctional myocardium, and resting 99mTc tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess perfusion in dysfunctional myocardium. Late (9 to 12 months) after revascularization, resting segmental contractile function was re-assessed using resting 2D echocardiography and global LV function (LVEF) by RNV.

Assessment of LVEF
LVEF was assessed before and 9 to 12 months after surgical revascularization by using equilibrium RNV.14 RNV was performed at rest with the patient in the supine position after the administration of 740 MBq of 99mTc. Images were acquired with a small field-of-view gamma camera (Orbiter, Siemens Corp, Iselin, NJ), oriented in the 45-degree left anterior oblique position with a 5- to 10-degree caudal tilt. The LVEF was calculated from the 45-degree left anterior oblique view by an automated technique. An improvement in LVEF by 5% or more was considered significant.15

Assessment of Resting Contractile Function Before/After Revascularization
Resting contractile function was assessed by 2D echocardiography before and 9 to 12 months after revascularization. Four standard views of the LV were recorded (videotape and digitized in cine-loop format): parasternal long- and short-axis views and apical two- and four-chamber views. The prerevascularization and the postrevascularization images were reviewed (random order) off-line and consensus was achieved by 2 observers unaware of the other tests (low-dose dobutamine echocardiography, perfusion imaging). For analysis, a 16-segment model was used as suggested by American Society of Echocardiography.16 Both inward wall motion and wall thickening were analyzed. Each segment was assigned a wall motion score of 1 to 4: normal or mildly hypokinetic=1, severely hypokinetic=2 (decreased endocardial excursion and systolic wall thickening), akinetic=3 (absence of endocardial excursion and systolic wall thickening), and dyskinetic=4 (paradoxic outward movement in systole). Segments were considered dysfunctional when the wall motion score was 2 or more. Improvement of segmental wall motion score after revascularization by 1 grade or more was considered significant with the exception of improvement from dyskinesia to akinesia postrevascularization.

Assessment of Contractile Reserve
Contractile reserve was assessed using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. Dobutamine was infused at 5 and 10 µg/kg/min, 5 minutes per stage. Images were acquired at the end of both stages (parasternal long- and short-axis views and apical two- and four-chamber views) and analyzed by 2 observers (blinded to the postrevascularization echocardiograms and unaware of the perfusion data) using the 16-segment model and the 4-point scoring system as described above. Dysfunctional segments (resting wall motion score 2 or more) were evaluated for the presence of contractile reserve, defined as improvement of wall motion score by 1 grade or more, with the exception of improvement from dyskinesia to akinesia.

Assessment of Perfusion
Perfusion was assessed at rest using 99mTc tetrofosmin (600 MBq) SPECT. Data acquisition was performed with a triple-head gamma camera system (Picker Prism 3000 XP, Cleveland, OH); the energy was centered on the 140 keV photon peak of 99mTc with a 15% window. Imaging was performed over 360 degrees (120 sectors of 3 degrees) with a total imaging time of 32 minutes. Data were stored in 64x64, 16-bit matrix. The raw scintigraphic data were reconstructed by filtered back projection using a Butterworth filter (cut-off frequency at 0.17 cycle/pixel, of order 3.5). No attenuation correction was used. Further reconstruction yielded standard long- and short-axis projections perpendicular to the heart axis. Reconstructed slices were 8 mm in all projections. The short-axis slices were displayed in polar map format, adjusted for peak myocardial activity (100%). The myocardium was divided into 16 segments, matching the echocardiographic segments (4 apical segments, 6 distal segments [anterior, anterolateral, inferolateral, inferior, inferoseptal, and anteroseptal], and 6 basal segments, comparable with the distal segments). Segments were divided into 4 categories: 1=normal tracer uptake (>75%), 2=moderately reduced tracer uptake (50% to 75%), 3=severely reduced tracer uptake (30% to 50%), and 4=absent tracer uptake (<30%). In dysfunctional segments, perfusion was considered preserved when activity was 50% or more (score 1 or 2).

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive results are expressed as mean±SD. Patient data were compared using the Student’s t test for paired and unpaired data when appropriate. Comparison of proportions was performed using chi-square analysis. McNemar testing was used to evaluate differences in positivity for contractile reserve (as assessed by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) and perfusion (assessed by 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT). P<.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Contractile Function, Pre- and
Postrevascularization

Six patients died during the study period (2 within 30 days after surgery (heart failure), 4 during the follow-up period (3 heart failure, 1 noncardiac death); 5 of these patients had absent perfusion and absent contractile reserve in all dysfunctional segments; 1 patient had 2 dysfunctional segments without perfusion/contractile reserve and 3 dysfunctional segments with preserved perfusion but without contractile reserve. In the remaining 108 patients, the symptoms improved significantly (mean CCS score reduced to 1.2±0.3, mean NYHA score reduced to 1.9±0.7, both P<.05 versus scores before revascularization).

Regional contractile function, as assessed by resting 2D echocardiography, demonstrated normal contraction in 392 (23%) segments and abnormal contraction in 1336 (77%) segments. Of the 1 336 dysfunctional segments, 646 were severely hypokinetic, 629 akinetic, and 61 dyskinetic. Improvement of function postrevascularization occurred in 357 (27%) segments (63% severely hypokinetic, 37% akinetic and 0% dyskinetic segments), whereas 979 (73%) segments did not improve (or even deteriorate in contractile function).

Recovery of function was not observed more frequently in the 41 patients with angina as compared with the 67 patients without angina (153 versus 204 dysfunctional segments).

LVEF was 34±10% before revascularization and did not significantly improve after revascularization (36±11%). However, an improvement in LVEF of 5% or more was observed in 38 patients (from 28±8% before to 36±4% after revascularization).

Presence of Contractile Reserve in Dysfunctional Myocardium
In the 1 336 dysfunctional segments, low-dose dobutamine echocardiography demonstrated improvement of function (contractile reserve) in 412 (31%) segments. Of these 412 segments with contractile reserve, approximately two-third were hypokinetic 68% and one-third were akinetic (Figure 1). In the remaining 924 dysfunctional segments, no improvement of contraction occurred during infusion of low-dose dobutamine.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relation between severity of contractile dysfunction at rest and the presence of contractile reserve; of the 412 segments with contractile reserve, 68% were hypokinetic, 31% akinetic, and 1% dyskinetic.

Preserved Perfusion in Dysfunctional Myocardium
In the 1 336 dysfunctional segments, 99mTc tetrofosmin demonstrated preserved perfusion in 683 (51%) segments; 57% of the segments had perfusion score 1, and 43% of the segments had perfusion score 2. Of the segments with preserved perfusion, the majority was hypokinetic (Figure 2). In the remaining 653 dysfunctional segments perfusion was not preserved (72% of the segments with perfusion score 3 and 28% of the segments with perfusion score 4).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relation between severity of contractile dysfunction at rest and the presence of intact perfusion; of the 683 segments with intact perfusion, 70% were hypokinetic, 28% akinetic, and 2% dyskinetic.

Intact Perfusion Versus Preserved Contractile Reserve in
Dysfunctional Myocardium

In the 1 336 dysfunctional segments, perfusion was more frequently preserved as compared with contractile reserve (31% versus 51%, P<.05). The exact distribution of segments according to the presence/absence of perfusion/contractile reserve is shown in Table 2. In the 683 segments with preserved perfusion, contractile reserve was present in 360 (53%) and absent in 323 (47%) segments. Conversely, in the 653 segments without preserved perfusion, contractile reserve was present in 52 (8%) segments and absent in 601 (92%) segments (Figure 3). Disagreement between the 2 techniques was 28%, with 86% being related to segments with preserved perfusion without contractile reserve.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Characteristics of All 1336 Dysfunctional Segments



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relation between contractile reserve and perfusion in chronic dysfunctional myocardium. Segments without intact perfusion virtually never have preserved contractile reserve (right); 47% of the segments with preserved perfusion do not exhibit contractile reserve.

The distribution of segments according to the presence/absence of perfusion/contractile reserve in relation to the absence/presence of angina is shown in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Dysfunctional Segments in Patients With and Without Angina

Perfusion and Contractile Reserve Versus Functional Outcome
The absence/presence of perfusion and absence/presence of contractile reserve in segments with and without improvement of contractile function after revascularization is shown in Figure 4. Of the 357 segments with recovery of function, the majority (66%) had both preserved perfusion and contractile reserve, whereas only 13% of the 979 segments without improvement of contractile function exhibited preserved perfusion and contractile reserve (P<.05 versus segments with improvement of function postrevascularization). The majority (58%) of the segments without improvement of contractile function postrevascularization exhibited neither intact perfusion nor preserved contractile reserve. In contrast, only 9% of the segments with improvement of contractile function postrevascularization lacked both perfusion and contractile reserve (P<.05 versus segments without improvement of function postrevascularization). Of interest, 22% of the segments with improvement of contractile function and 25% of the segments without improvement of contractile function postrevascularization showed intact perfusion without contractile reserve. Finally, small percentages of segments with and without improvement of function (3% and 4%, respectively) showed preserved contractile reserve without intact perfusion.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Distribution (according to presence/absence of contractile reserve/perfusion) of segments with and without recovery postrevascularization. CR: contractile reserve; P: perfusion; +: present; -: absent.

Of the 360 segments with preserved perfusion/contractile reserve, 66% exhibited recovery of function. Of the 601 segments without preserved perfusion/contractile reserve, 95% did not improve in function. Of the 323 segments with preserved perfusion without contractile reserve, 24% improved in function. Of the 52 segments with contractile reserve without perfusion, 79% did not improve in function.

Finally, the segments with higher levels of preserved perfusion demonstrated a higher likelihood of recovery; 225 of 389 segments with tracer uptake >75% improved in function postrevascularization as compared with 132 of 294 segments with tracer uptake 50% to 75%.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the assessment of residual viability in areas with chronic contractile dysfunction is important for prediction of improvement of function postrevascularization and prediction of long-term prognosis.16 Different techniques are available that rely on different characteristics of viable myocardium.16 Perfusion imaging (using 99mTc-labeled tracers or 201Tl) and assessment of contractile reserve (using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) are widely used in the clinical setting for the assessment of viable myocardium. However, frequently chronic dysfunctional myocardium has preserved perfusion whereas contractile reserve is lacking.11,12 Data on the functional outcome of these segments are scarce.17 In the present study, perfusion imaging was compared with assessment of contractile reserve in a large number of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were already scheduled for surgical revascularization. Both intact perfusion and the presence of contractile reserve were related to the severity of contractile dysfunction. Both perfusion and contractile reserve were more frequently observed in segments with severe hypokinesia as compared with akinetic segments, whereas dyskinetic virtually never exhibited intact perfusion of contractile reserve. Thus, the presence of these characteristics appears related to the severity of damage.

Moreover, perfusion was significantly more often preserved as compared with contractile reserve: 51% of the chronic dysfunctional segments showed intact perfusion and 31% showed contractile reserve. Head-to-head comparison of the individual segments revealed that the disagreement between the 2 imaging modalities was 28%, with 86% of these segments showing preserved perfusion without contractile reserve. Similar results have been reported by Panza et al,12 who compared 201Tl imaging with dobutamine echocardiography and demonstrated that a large number of segments demonstrated 201Tl uptake but lacked contractile reserve. Studies comparing metabolic imaging with FDG to assessment of contractile reserve by dobutamine echocardiography have shown comparable results: A substantial percentage of the segments with FDG uptake did not exhibit contractile reserve.18,19 Pagano and colleagues20 demonstrated that segments with FDG uptake without contractile reserve had more ultrastructural damage and a higher percentage of fibrosis as compared with segments with preserved FDG uptake and intact contractile reserve. Nagueh and coworkers17 studied 20 patients with 201Tl imaging and dobutamine echocardiography before surgical revascularization, and transmural biopsies were taken during surgery. The authors demonstrated a gradual increase of percentage fibrosis in different segments: 1% fibrosis in segments with both preserved 201Tl uptake and contractile reserve, 9% fibrosis in segments with either preserved 201Tl uptake or contractile reserve, and 28% fibrosis in segments without 201Tl uptake and without contractile reserve. These findings further substantiate the suggestion the severity of ultrastructural damage and fibrosis is related to the presence/absence of perfusion and contractile reserve. Segments with both characteristics have the least damage and fibrosis, segments with perfusion without contractile reserve have more damage/fibrosis and segments without perfusion/contractile reserve have the most severe damage/fibrosis.

An important issue is how these findings affect improvement of function postrevascularization. In the present study, the majority of the segments with improvement of contractile function postrevascularization showed both preserved perfusion and contractile reserve. Segments with both characteristics presents may thus have a high likelihood of recovery of function post-revascularization (66% of the segments with both characteristics improved in function). In contrast, the majority of segments without recovery of function postrevascularization lacked both perfusion and contractile reserve. Segments without intact perfusion and contractile reserve may thus be considered to have a low likelihood of recovery of function postrevascularization (95% of the segments without perfusion/contractile reserve did not improve in function).

The segments with intact perfusion without contractile reserve pose a problem; 22% of the segments with recovery of function exhibited this pattern, but 25% of the segments without recovery of function also exhibited this pattern. Thus, segments with preserved perfusion without contractile reserve have an intermediate likelihood of recovery postrevascularization. However, from a clinical standpoint, it is important to emphasize that patients with preserved perfusion with contractile reserve may recover in function postrevascularization and should not routinely be denied surgical revascularization. Future studies are needed to identify which patients with this pattern are likely to improve and which patients will not improve in function postrevascularization.

Limitations
Functional follow-up was performed at 9 to 12 months, whereas longer follow-up may be needed for complete recovery of function. This may be of particular importance in patients with severely damaged myocardium. In addition, long-term survival may be a superior end-point than improvement of function.

Graft patency was not assessed; thus, graft occlusion may have prevented some viable segments from recovery of function.

Finally, although a similar 16-segment model was used for echo and SPECT data, misalignment may have influenced the results.


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
In chronic dysfunctional myocardium, perfusion is preserved more frequently than contractile reserve. Segments with both preserved perfusion and contractile reserve have a high likelihood of recovery of function postrevascularization; segments without preserved perfusion/contractile reserve have a low likelihood of recovery. Segments with preserved perfusion without contractile reserve have an intermediate likelihood of recovery after revascularization. Additional testing needs to be developed to predict which of these segments will improve and which segments will not improve in function.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusions
*References
 

  1. Wijns W, Vatner SF, Camici PG. Hibernating myocardium. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 173–181.[Free Full Text]
  2. Marwick TH. The viable myocardium: epidemiology, detection, and clinical implications. Lancet. 1998; 351: 815–819.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Beller GA. Selecting patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy for medical treatment, revascularization, or heart transplantation. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997; 4: S152–S157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Bonow RO. Identification of viable myocardium. Circulation. 1996; 94: 2674–2678.[Free Full Text]
  5. Udelson JE. Testing our tests: surrogate end points versus driving patient management and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 89–92.[Free Full Text]
  6. Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of various noninasive techniques for detecting hibernating myocardium. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2001; 26: 141–186.
  7. Schelbert HR. Measurements of myocardial metabolism in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82 (5A):61K–67K.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Schwaiger M, Melin J. Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine. Lancet. 1999; 354: 661–666.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Beller GA, Ragosta M. Extent of myocardial viability in regions of left ventricular dysfunction by rest-redistribution thallium-201 imaging: a powerful predictor of outcome. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998; 5: 445–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Gibbons RJ. Myocardial perfusion imaging. Heart. 2001; 83: 555–560.
  11. Dilsizian V. Myocardial viability: contractile reserve or cell membrane integrity? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28: 443–446.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Panza JA, Dilsizian V, Laurienzo JM, et al. Relation between thallium uptake and contractile response to dobutamine: implications regarding myocardial viability in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1995; 91: 990–998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Vanoverschelde JLJ, Melin JA. Metabolic imaging and contractile reserve for assessment of myocardial viability: friends or foes? J Nucl Cardiol. 1999; 6: 458–461.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Wackers FJT, Berger HJ, Johnstone DE, et al. Multiple gated cardiac blood pool imaging for left ventricular ejection fraction: validation of the technique and assessment of variability. Am J Cardiol. 1979; 43: 1159–1165.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Bax JJ, Visser FC, Poldermans D, et al. Relationship between preoperative viability and postoperative improvement in LVEF and heart failure symptoms. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42: 79–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendation for quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Sco Echocardiogr. 1989; 2: 358–367.
  17. Nagueh SF, Mikati I, Weilbaecher D, et al. Relation of contractile reserve of hibernating myocardium in relation to myocardial structure in humans. Circulation. 1999; 100: 490–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sawada S, Elsner G, Segar DS, et al. Evaluation of patterns of perfusion and metabolism in dobutamine-responsive myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 55–61.[Abstract]
  19. Sun KT, Czernin J, Krivokapich J, et al. Effects of dobutamine stimulation on myocardial blood flow, glucose metabolism, and wall motion in normal and dysfunctional myocardium. Circulation. 1996; 94: 3146–3154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pagano D, Townend JN, Parums DV, et al. Hibernating myocardium: morphological correlates of inotropic stimulation and glucose uptake. Heart. 2000; 83: 456–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roelandt, J. R. T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roelandt, J. R. T. C.