(Circulation. 2002;105:e46.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
vß3 IntegrinMediated Binding of Smooth Muscle Cells to Thrombospondin and Prothrombin
COR Therapeutics, Inc, South San Francisco, Calif, E-mail rscarborough@corr.com
To the Editor:
The recent article in Circulation by Lele et al1 reports
vß3 inhibitory activity of eptifibatide. Surprisingly, the authors contend that this is a novel observation. Lele et al1 demonstrate inhibition of
vß3-mediated adhesion of human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) to thrombospondin (TSP) or prothrombin, human umbilical vein endothelial cell attachment to TSP or vitronectin, as well as the inhibition of TSP-induced proliferation of HASMCs mediated by
vß3, with IC50 values of approximately 30 µmol/L in each assay. All of these data are consistent with the original publication on the
IIbß3 antagonist, eptifibatide, by Scarborough et al.2 The authors reported that this agent is a highly selective integrin antagonist. They also showed that at higher concentrations, eptifibatide can inhibit vitronectin binding to purified
vß3, can inhibit von Willebrand factor binding to purified
vß3, and can inhibit M21 melanoma cell attachment to vitronectin mediated by
vß3 with IC50 values of 5, 40, and 7.5 µmol/L, respectively.2 Why, then, would Lele et al make their conclusions of novelty with this nearly identical and supportive data and furthermore suggest that Scarborough et al2 showed that eptifibatide does not interact with
vß3? Mistakenly, in the last sentence of their report Lele et al state that eptifibatide is "a synthetic, cyclic peptide with a Lys-Gly-Asp (KGD) sequence." Thus, the authors appear to have mistaken the structure of eptifibatide from the original publication by Scarborough et al2 and have drawn correspondingly incorrect conclusions about eptifibatides biological activity based on this mistaken identity. In fact, eptifibatide does not contain a KGD sequence but contains the homoArg-Gly-Asp (modified KGD) sequence (compound 34 in reference 2).2,3 The original publications on eptifibatide2,4 correctly reported the approximately 300- to 400-fold higher affinity of eptifibatide for
IIbß3 versus
vß3, supporting the view that eptifibatide is a highly selective integrin antagonist. Nevertheless, it is true that at therapeutic concentrations of eptifibatide,5 some inhibition of
vß3 may occur based on data reported earlier2 and pointed out by Lele et al.1
References
vß3 integrinmediated binding of smooth muscle cells to thrombospondin and prothrombin. Circulation. 2001; 104: 582587.Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
We readily acknowledge the contributions of Dr Scarborough but disagree with his assertion that his work answered all relevant questions in regards to eptifibatide interactions with
vß3 integrins (the vitronectin receptor) on vascular cells. Despite his prior studies, the paradigm until recently was that abciximab was the only glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in clinical use that cross-reacted with
vß3 at clinically relevant concentrations. This was illustrated by a recent review of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors that stated: "Furthermore, abciximab binds to other receptors, such as the vitronectin and Mac-1 receptors, while tirofiban and eptifibatide bind specifically to the GP IIb/IIIa receptor."1
A major emphasis of our work2 was to demonstrate that eptifibatide directly interacts with
vß3 on vascular cells in vitro and has functional effects at concentrations that are achieved clinically. Our studies used smooth muscle and endothelial cells, whereas Dr Scarborough used purified
vß3 and M21 melanoma cells. The complexity of
vß3 regulation, and the importance of directly studying vascular cells, is highlighted by recent work showing that
vß3 can be activated, that the basal affinity state of
vß3 differs among different cell types and that there are activation-dependent and activation-independent ligands.3,4
The major conclusion of our studies, that functional inhibition of
vß3 in vascular cells may occur at therapeutic concentrations of eptifibatide, is supported by our data as Dr Scarborough acknowledges. Further studies are now needed to delineate the clinical importance of antagonism of
vß3 integrins by abciximab and eptifibatide.
Finally, we should have stated in our article that eptifibatide is a synthetic, cyclic peptide with a modified Lys-Gly-Asp (KGD) sequence. This error does not detract from our data as we used eptifibatide, provided by COR Therapeutics, for all of our experiments.
References
vß3 integrinmediated binding of smooth muscle cells to thrombospondin and prothrombin. Circulation. 2001; 104: 582587.
vß3 detected with a novel patch-engineered monovalent ligand. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 2160921616.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |