(Circulation. 2002;105:e44.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK, E-mail ashrafian@hotmail.com
To the Editor:
Jóhannsson et al1 have recently observed upregulation of the Monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) in congestive heart failure (CHF). The implied increased uptake of exogenous (systemic) lactate confirms the potential significance of increased carbohydrate metabolism as a compensatory adaptation in CHF and also identifies a potential therapeutic focus. However, 3 points deserve emphasis:
(1) Although increased MCT-1 appears to be a feature of at least a subgroup of ventricular dysfunction, certainly indicating an increased reliance on systemic lactate, Jóhannsson et al interpret a lack of comparable glucose transporter (Glut-1 and -4) upregulation to suggest endogenous glycolytically derived lactate is relatively insignificant. Their assertion derives from the widely held traditional notion that fatty acid metabolism (FAM), coincidentally the major energy source in normal hearts, antagonizes glycolysis and vice versa.
Contemporary studies, while accepting a relative fuel polarization with mutual FAM/glycolysis antagonism, also emphasize the benefits of synergy between FAM/glycolysis in muscle.2 An example of this synergism is AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK), a fundamental orchestrator of myocyte energy regulation. Activation of AMPK, stimulates energy production from both glycolysis (by activating 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase) and activates ß-oxidation of fatty acids by increasing the transport of fatty acids to mitochondria (by reducing malonyl-CoA).3
Thus, although the significantly increased MCT-1 indicates a significant increase in systemic lactate use relative to controls, the lack of a commensurate GLUT upregulation (conventionally stimulated by acute ischemia and insulin, neither of which occurred) only suggests that this transporter may not be kinetically limiting. Conclusions about the importance of glycolysis or lack of it are therefore unsupported.
(2) Furthermore, though a critical feature of the Wistar infarction model of CHF, MCT-1 may not be a typical feature of all CHF. Recent studies have indicated that the improvement in CHF prognosis associated with ß-blockers may result from the increased metabolic efficiency derived from a reduction in FAM and a relative increase in glycolysis as well as exogenous lactate utilization.4 Thus, this CHF model with increased MCT-1 and carbohydrate utilization may represent a well-compensated form of ventricular dysfunction. Alternatively the upregulated carbohydrate metabolism in CHF may represent a marker of beneficial transcriptional switching responding to stress (eg, PPAR-a downregulation).5 Either way, the noted increase in MCT-1 may not be representative of all CHF.
(3) Finally, the assertion that systemic lactate itself may be the stimulus to MCT-1 upregulation, though possible in the context of increased lactate in advanced CHF, need not be invoked. Both the increase in end-diastolic pressures and the increased ventricular radius result in significantly increased wall tensions. Thus, the increased myocardial work and the reduced pressure-dependent perfusion render the whole myocardium, particularly the subendocardium (both infarcted and noninfarcted segments), hypoxically/energetically compromised. The increased work and decreased ATP/Oxygen are sufficient/effective stimuli for an MCT-1 response. Furthermore, an increase in carbohydrate metabolism would directly mitigate these insults by reducing oxygen demand and increasing myocyte efficiency.4
References
during cardiac hypertrophic growth. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 17231730.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Ullevaal Hospital;, Department of Anatomy, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Department of Anatomy, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
We are glad Ashrafian recognizes our identification of an upregulation of the monocarboxylate transporter (MCT1) in congestive heart failure (CHF) and the potential therapeutic implications.1 Also, our conclusion that this indicates an increased reliance of cardiac metabolism on circulating lactate seems undisputed. The main determinants of myocardial energy demand are heart rate, contractility, and wall tension. Available data indicate that energy demand is not necessarily increased in CHF,2 possibly because the effect of increased wall tension is counteracted by the reduced responsiveness to ß-adrenergic stimulation. Thus, the myocardium is not "hypoxically/energetically compromised" in CHF unless there is a concomitant ischemic heart disease, as is most often the case in humans. There is also compelling evidence that the reliance on fatty acid oxidation is less in CHF hearts.3 These observations fit nicely together: the energy turnover is almost unchanged, oxidation of fatty acids is reduced, and oxidation of carbohydratespossibly lactate when it is availableis increased. Tian et al4 recently reported that AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) was activated in hypertrophied hearts, but concluded that because rate limiting enzymes for fatty acid oxidation are downregulated, long-term activation of AMPK is unable to increase flux through this pathway. Also, there would be no demand for higher rates of oxidation of substrates. In contrast to Ashrafian, we therefore believe that the Randle cycle is at work (see review, Randle5). We agree with Ashrafian that the lack of upregulation of GLUT4 and GLUT1 in CHF does not mean that circulating glucose cannot be metabolized at high rates, although these transporters are thought to limit the rate of glucose utilization by the heart.6 However, the upregulation of MCT1 would mean that circulating lactatewhen availablegains access to the cell more easily, bypassing any rate limitation imposed by glycolysis and glucose transport. Because the failing heart is not ischemic, we do not agree with Ashrafian that the "decreased ATP/Oxygen are sufficient/effective stimuli for an MCT1 response." However, there are other candidate stimuli than the increased lactate concentration in blood that we suggested. Finally, our heart failure rats were undoubtedly in decompensated failure because, as a consequence of reduced velocity of shortening of the left ventricle and high end diastolic pressure, they had severe lung congestion. However, it remains to be seen whether MCT1 upregulation is a general feature of end stage heart failure irrespective of cause.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Wellner, R. Dechend, J.-K. Park, E. Shagdarsuren, N. Al-Saadi, T. Kirsch, P. Gratze, W. Schneider, S. Meiners, A. Fiebeler, et al. Cardiac gene expression profile in rats with terminal heart failure and cachexia Physiol Genomics, February 10, 2005; 20(3): 256 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |