Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;105:720-725
Published online before print December 31, 2001, doi: 10.1161/hc0602.103639
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/6/720    most recent
hc0602.103639v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arndt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goette, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arndt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goette, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies

(Circulation. 2002;105:720.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Altered Expression of ADAMs (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase) in Fibrillating Human Atria

Marco Arndt, PhD*; Uwe Lendeckel, PhD*; Christoph Röcken, MD; Karen Nepple, MS; Carmen Wolke, PhD; Antje Spiess, BSc; Christof Huth, MD; Siegfried Ansorge, PhD; Helmut U. Klein, MD; Andreas Goette, MD

From the Institute of Experimental Internal Medicine (M.A., U.L., C.W., A.S., S.A.), Institute of Pathology (C.R.), Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (C.H.), and Division of Cardiology (K.N., H.U.K., A.G.), University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.

Correspondence to Andreas Goette, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail andreas.goette{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Background ADAMs (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase) are ectoproteases that have recently been reported to be expressed in cardiac tissue. Although they are known to regulate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, their pathophysiological role in various cardiac diseases is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether structural remodeling of the atria during atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with altered ADAM expression.

Methods and Results Atrial tissue samples of 30 patients undergoing open-heart surgery were examined. Fifteen patients had persistent AF (>=6 months), and the remaining 15 patients had no history of AF. ADAM9, ADAM10, and ADAM15 expression was analyzed quantitatively at the mRNA and protein levels. ADAM expression was localized by immunohistochemistry. ADAM expression was correlated with amounts of integrins ß1 and ß3. The amount of ADAM10 protein more than doubled during AF (82±15 versus 36±8 U; P<0.01). Amounts of ADAM15 protein (102±12 versus 40±6 U; P<0.01) and mRNA (24.0±5.6 versus 10.5±2.5 U; P<0.05) increased significantly during AF compared with sinus rhythm. ADAM9 protein was not detected in any sample. ADAM/integrin ratios showed an increase of 4- to 6-fold (P<0.05) in patients with AF who had significantly dilated atria (4.94±0.6 versus 4.3±0.7 cm; P<0.05). ADAM/integrin ratios correlated with atrial diameter.

Conclusions AF is associated with an increase in the expression of ADAM10 and ADAM15. Enhanced ADAM-dependent disintegrin and metalloproteinase activity may be a molecular mechanism that contributes to the dilation of fibrillating human atria.


Key Words: metalloproteinases • fibrillation • pathology • remodeling


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a potential cause of thromboembolic events.1,2 Several studies have shown that AF induces significant changes in the electrophysiological properties of atrial myocytes and causes alterations in the structure of the atrial tissue.39 Alterations in the atrial tissue architecture may contribute to the mechanical dysfunction and dilation of the atria.610 The molecular basis for the development of structural atrial remodeling of fibrillating human atria is still a matter of debate. Its understanding, however, could have an important therapeutic impact.

ADAMs (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase), also referred to as MDCs (metalloproteinase/disintegrin/cysteine-rich), form a large family of membrane-bound glycoproteins that function in proteolysis, signaling, adhesion, and fusion.11,12 Generally, they are involved in essential cellular processes such as fertilization, myoblast fusion, neuronal development, and cleavage-secretion of membrane-bound proteins. Because of their disintegrin and metalloproteinase activity, ADAMs are known to regulate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and may thereby influence the architecture of cardiac tissue. In addition, ADAMs may also be of importance for structural remodeling of cardiac tissue by performing cleavage-secretion of surface-bound proteins.1319

The purpose of the present study was to assess the role of cell surface members of the ADAM family (ADAMs9, 10, and 15) and their relationship to the expression of integrins ß1 and ß3 in atrial tissue of patients with and without AF.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Right atrial appendages were obtained from 30 patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery or mitral/aortic valve replacement. Tissue samples were taken from 15 consecutive patients with chronic persistent AF (>=6 months) and from 15 patients with no history of AF (SR). The clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription
Samples of human atrial appendages were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -192°C until further analysis. Total RNA was prepared as described recently14 by applying the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi.20 A 1-µg quantity of total RNA was transcribed into cDNA by using avian myeloma virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) as described previously.14

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the Lightcycler LC24 (Idaho Technology). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. A 10-µL reaction mixture consisted of 1x reaction mixture with BSA (Idaho Technology); 3 mmol/L MgCl2; 200 µmol/L dNTPs; 0.4 U InViTaq-polymerase (InViTek); 0.2 µL of a 1:1000 dilution of SYBR-Green I (Molecular Probes); 1 µL cDNA; and 0.5 µmol/L of the specific primers for ADAM9 (5'-GCTAGTTGGACTGGAGATTTGG-3' and 5'-TTATTAC-CACAGGAGGGAGCAC-3'), ADAM10 (5'-TAACTCCCGG-CAGGTGGTGG-3' and 5'-GCCACGCAGTCCATTCAGGG-3'), and ADAM15 (5'-CAAATATAGGTGGCACTGAGGAG-3' and 5'-TAGCAGCAGTTCTCAAAGTGTG-3').

Initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 seconds was followed by 40 cycles with denaturation at 95°C for 0.1 second, annealing at 65°C for 3 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 16 seconds. Quantities of 18S-mRNA were determined with the reverse transcriptase primer pair available from Ambion and used to normalize cDNA contents. The fluorescence intensity of the double-strand–specific SYBR-Green I, reflecting the amount of PCR product actually formed, was read in real time at the end of each elongation step. Then, amounts of specific initial template mRNA were calculated by determining the time point at which the linear increase of sample PCR product started relative to the corresponding points of a standard curve; these are given as arbitrary units.

Western Blotting
Sample preparation and blotting were performed exactly as described previously.14 Monoclonal anti–integrins ß1 and ß3 and polyclonal rabbit anti-ADAM10, anti-ADAM9 (Chemicon), and anti-ADAM1521 antibodies as well as goat-anti-mouse horse-raddish peroxidase (New England BioLabs) and Supersignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Pierce) were used for immunochemiluminescence detection. The resulting images were quantified densitometrically using RFLP-Scan software (MWG Biotech). The mean relative absorption units of the group with sinus rhythm (SR) were set as controls, and these were compared with the corresponding means of the AF groups.

To determine the amounts of membrane-bound or soluble ADAM15, tissue samples were homogenized in 5 volumes of 20 mmol/L HEPES buffer and 0.25 mol/L sucrose, pH 7.0. The supernatant obtained at 100 000g was regarded as the soluble fraction and the resuspended pellet as the membrane fraction.

Densitometric quantification for comparison of the different groups was performed only on blots processed equally and exposed on the same x-ray film.

Immunohistochemistry
Specimens from eight right atrial appendages were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Deparaffinized sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunostaining with monoclonal anti–integrins ß1 and ß3 and polyclonal anti-ADAM10 (dilution 1:400) and anti-ADAM15 (1:100) was performed using a Vectastain ABC alkaline phosphatase kit (distributed by CAMON). Sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Incubation was performed in a moist chamber at 37°C for 1 hour. Polyvalent anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (30 minutes, room temperature; Immunotech) served as secondary antibody. Immunostaining was visualized by alkaline phosphatase (30 minutes, room temperature; Immunotech) and the addition of its substrate Fast Red/Naphthol Mx (Immunotech). Washings between steps were performed using TBS. The specimens were counterstained with hematoxylin and embedded in gelatin. Specimens in which primary antibodies were omitted served as controls.

High-Resolution Immunofluorescence Analysis
Isolated human fibroblasts were grown for 24 hours on coverslips in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS (BioWest). Cells were washed twice with PBS and subsequently fixed, permeabilized, and immunostained using the Fix&Perm cell permeabilization kit (An Der Grub BioResearch) according to the recommended protocol. Nonspecific binding was prevented by 30-minute incubation in a mixture of equal volumes of goat and mouse serum at room temperature. Subsequently, monoclonal anti–integrin-ß1, polyclonal rabbit anti-ADAM15, or a mixture of both was applied to the cells in 1:20 dilutions in PBS and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. After extensive washing in PBS, cells were incubated for 30 minutes with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to FITC (Sigma; 1:200) and anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Texas Red (ICN Biomedicals; 1:200). For nuclear staining, 1 µg/mL 4',6-diamidine-2'-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, Roche) was included in the secondary antibody dilutions. After washing in PBS, cells were mounted on slides using Fluromount-G (Southern Biotechnology Associates Inc). Fluorescence images were captured using an RT slider Spot camera (Visitron Systems) and the Zeiss filter sets 01 (DAPI), 10 (FITC), and 00 (Texas Red). Images were processed by the 2-dimensional deconvolution module of the MetaMorph software (Visitron Systems).

Statistical Analysis
Differences in the amounts of ADAM mRNA and ADAM or integrin protein between the 2 groups of patients were evaluated using the Student t-test. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the relationship between parameters. All values are expressed as mean±SD, and a P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
The baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The severity of the underlying heart diseases and noncardiac diseases were similar for both groups. The diameter of the left atrium was increased in patients with AF (AF, 4.94±0.6 cm; SR, 4.3±0.7 cm; P<0.05).

ADAM 9, 10, and 15 Gene Expression
Generally, the mean amounts of ADAM mRNAs were elevated in patients with AF compared with those with SR. However, for ADAM9 (11.4±3.4 versus 5.0±0.6 U; P=NS) and ADAM10 (6.3±2.0 versus 2.5±0.4 U; P=NS), the observed increase did not reach statistical significance. The mean amounts of ADAM15 mRNA were significantly increased in patients with AF (24.0±5.6 U) compared with SR (104.9±24.8 U; P<0.05) (Figure 1).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Atrial expression of ADAM9, ADAM10, and ADAM15 mRNA in patients with SR and AF. ADAM15 mRNA expression was significantly increased in patients with AF. *P<0.05.

ADAM9, ADAM10, and ADAM15 Protein Expression
ADAM9 was not detectable by Western blotting techniques in the atrial tissue of patients with AF and SR. In patients with AF, there was a marked upregulation of ADAM10 (0.82±0.15 versus 0.36±0.08 U; P<0.01) and ADAM15 (1.02±0.12 versus 0.4±0.06 U; P<0.01) compared with those with SR (Figure 2A and 2B).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Representative Western blots of ADAM9, ADAM10, and ADAM15 from patients with SR and AF. B, Densitometric quantification of Western blots from patients with SR and AF. *P<0.01.

In patients with AF, the majority of ADAM15 protein was detected in the membrane fraction (78.8%). In contrast, 69.6% of ADAM15 immunoreactivity was assigned to the cytosolic fraction in patients with SR (Figure 3). Similar to the overall results, differences in ADAM protein levels were also observed when sex-matched pairs (n=11) were analyzed. Sex per se did not influence ADAM expression.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. ADAM15 protein amounts in cytosolic and membrane fractions of atrial tissue from patients with SR and AF. *P<0.05 cytosol vs membrane; {dagger}P<0.05 AF vs SR.

Integrin ß1 and ß3 Protein Expression
In patients with AF, there was a trend toward an increased expression of integrin ß1 only (109.7%±46.4%) and integrin ß3 (120.2%±58.5%) compared with SR (100%; P=NS).

Correlation of ADAM15 and Integrin ß1 Protein Expression
In patients with AF, the ADAM15/integrin ß3 and ADAM15/integrin ß1 protein ratios were significantly elevated compared with patients with SR (ß1 ratio, 4.46±2.6 versus 0.65±0.14 U, and ß3 ratio, 1.51±0.64 versus 0.37±0.17 U; P<0.05) (Figure 4). Analysis of individual expression values showed a significant positive correlation of ADAM15 with integrin ß1 protein levels (r=0.76). Importantly, the ADAM15/integrin ß1 ratio correlated significantly with the left atrial diameter (r=0.75; P<0.05) and the duration of fibrillation (r=0.80; P<0.05).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Ratios of protein amounts of ADAM15 and integrin ß1 or ß3 are significantly elevated in patients with AF (gray boxes) as compared with SR (white boxes). *P<0.05.

Histochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the distribution pattern of ADAM10 and ADAM15 was similar in the atria of patients with (n=4) or without (n=4) AF. Both ADAMs were expressed by vascular smooth muscle cells; endocardial cells; fibroblasts; vascular endothelial cells; and occasionally, epicardial cells. In addition, immunostaining for ADAM15 was found in cardiac myocytes; in the lumens of blood vessels; and, also occasionally, extracellularly within the interstitial matrix (Figure 5).



View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunostaining of atrial tissue with ADAM10 (left lane) and ADAM15 (right lane) antibody (red staining). Fibroblasts showed moderate to strong immunostaining for ADAM10 (arrowheads). ADAM15 was found in fibroblasts (arrowheads), in cardiac myocytes and extracellularly in the interstitium (*). AF did not change the staining pattern of these ADAMs. Original magnification x40.

The pattern of integrin ß1 and ß3 expression was also similar in patients with and without AF. Integrin ß1 was expressed mainly by myocytes and only occasionally by fibroblasts, whereas integrin ß1 was found in myocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and epicardial cells.

High-resolution immunofluorescence analysis revealed a colocalization of ADAM15 and integrin ß1 in isolated human fibroblasts (Figure 6).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Localization of ADAM15 (top left) and integrin ß1 (top right) in isolated human fibroblasts. Nuclei are visualized by DAPI staining (bottom left). Bottom right, Overlay of ADAM15-derived (green) and integrin ß1–derived (red) immunofluorescence signals with that of DAPI (blue) indicates colocalization (orange) of ADAM15 and integrin ß1.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Main Findings
The present study describes profound changes in ADAM expression in fibrillating atrial tissue and suggests a molecular mechanism that seems to contribute to atrial dilation during AF. Atrial tissue of patients with AF shows increased levels of ADAM10 and ADAM15 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. Membrane expression of ADAM15 is significantly upregulated during AF, whereas most ADAM15 is retarded in the cytoplasm during SR. The ADAM15/integrin ß1 ratio is significantly increased in fibrillating tissue and correlates with the left atrial diameter and the duration of fibrillation.

Effect of Increased ADAM Expression
The purpose of the present study was (1) to determine whether ADAMs9, 10, and 15 are expressed in human atrial tissue and (2) to investigate whether the expression pattern changes at mRNA and/or protein levels during AF. AF is known to be associated with progressive structural changes of the atria resulting in atrial dilation and loss of transport function.110 Some of these changes may be a consequence of the activity of ADAMs. The expression of ADAMs has been described in cardiac tissue.22,23 However, the present study is the first to show an alteration in cardiac ADAM expression in response to a specific pathological condition.

In previous studies, we described profound changes in the angiotensin system during AF, including an upregulation in the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme24 and loss of angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression.14 In these patients, the switch from dominant angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression to that of angiotensin II type 2 receptor seems to represent a compensatory mechanism aimed at the limitation of progressive atrial fibrosis.14,25 In the present study, we found that the expression of individual ADAMs is increased during AF. Several studies have shown significant morphological changes (fibrosis/atrial dilation) in atrial tissue of patients with AF.9,24,26 Interestingly, atrial tissue from patients with AF shows structural and molecular abnormalities comparable with those demonstrated in failing human ventricles.10,14,24 Recently, Ding et al13 described altered ß1-integrin deposition associated with morphological changes in the failing heart. Integrin attachment to the extracellular matrix represents fixed anchorage points, and it is assumed that they need to be changed repeatedly as myocytes grow and change morphology.13 Shedding of integrins into the extracellular matrix is consistent with cell growth,18,19 and it is proposed by Ding et al13 that integrin shedding is a significant feature of hypertrophic growth and, furthermore, is associated with changes in tissue architecture and cavity geometry. One likely mechanism is the shedding of integrin ß1 by ADAMs, which are known to be associated with integrins in other tissues.2729 In addition to shedding of integrins, ADAMs can also bind to integrins and, thereby, affect cell adhesion. As shown for ADAM9 and 15, their potential role in regulating cell adhesion results from binding to integrin {alpha}6ß1 or {alpha}9ß1, respectively.2729 It is tempting to speculate, thus, that changes in ADAM expression and their effects on integrins ß1 and ß3 alter cell-matrix interactions, which contributes to the dilation of fibrillating atria.2,3,26

Our data strongly suggest a role for ADAMs in the structural remodeling of fibrillating atria. We demonstrated that ADAM15 and integrin ß1 are largely colocalized on human fibroblasts. The increased atrial expression of ADAM10 and 15 during AF goes along with nonsignificantly elevated amounts of integrin ß1 and ß3 proteins. Integrin cleavage products, however, were not detected by Western blotting or immunohistochemistry. Thus, it seems unlikely that ADAM10 and 15 participate in the shedding of these integrins. In contrast to integrin shedding, binding of ADAM at integrin molecules may inhibit a regular integrin-matrix interaction, which may increase "cell motility" and result in sliding and slippage of atrial cells. Thus, the increased ADAM/integrin interaction appears to be a molecular mechanism that explains atrial dilation; this is further supported by the significant correlation between ADAM/integrin ratio and atrial diameter. Interestingly, the observed increase in total ADAM15 protein in patients with AF was due to selective induction of membrane-bound ADAM15, whereas in patients with SR a major fraction could be assigned to the cytosol. This further suggests a functional linkage between ADAMs and integrins during AF. Progressive dilation of fibrillating atria is a well-described clinical phenomenon.3032 Increased atrial diameters are predictive of a poor outcome for cardioversion and, in addition, correlate with increased rates of thromboembolic events during AF.3234 Therefore, the molecular findings demonstrated here may have significant clinical relevance because characterization of the molecular mechanism involved in atrial dilation may help to define novel therapeutic strategies in patients with AF. In this context, the development of specific inhibitors of ADAM activity appears to be feasible. Whether ADAMs have other roles in cell adhesion or ectodomain shedding of factors that affect fibrillating atrial tissue remains to be established in future studies.

Limitations
Some potential limitations may have influenced our results. All patients included in our study underwent cardiac surgery because of coronary artery disease or valve diseases. Thus, no comment can be made about the possible impact of ADAMs on structural changes in other patient populations. Only right atrial samples were examined; therefore, our present findings may not be representative of other parts of the atria. Although a relatively small number of tissue samples were analyzed, the differences in ADAM expression were found to be highly significant. The apparent discordance between quantities of ADAM9 mRNA and protein requires further investigation. However, discordances between mRNA and protein levels due to posttranscriptional processing have been described previously14,35; these discordances might have resulted in protein levels of ADAM9 being below the detection limits of our study. Further experiments in animal models may support the present data as well as previous experimental findings.


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the very first report demonstrating the regulation of atrial ADAM expression in patients with and without AF. The increased ADAM expression seems to contribute to structural changes (dilation) of fibrillating atria. These findings may be of clinical importance in developing new therapeutic strategies to prevent atrial dilation and, thereby, the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with AF.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01 ZZ 0107). We thank Carl Blobel (Sloan Kettering Institute, New York) for helpful comments, and Christine Wolf, Bianca Schultze, and Simone Philipsen for excellent technical assistance.


*    Footnotes
 
*Drs Arndt and Lendeckel contributed equally to this study. Back

Received September 10, 2001; revision received November 26, 2001; accepted December 14, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusions
*References
 
1. Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, et al. Epidemiological features of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med. 1982; 306: 1018–1022.

2. Murgatroyd FD, Camm AJ. Atrial arrhythmias. Lancet. 1993; 341: 1317–1322.

3. Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Jones DL, et al. Chronic rapid atrial pacing: structural, functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1995; 91: 1588–1595.

4. Wijffels MCEF, Kirchhof CJHJ, Dorland R, et al. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation: a study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1954–1968.

5. Goette A, Honeycutt C, Langberg JJ. Electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation: time course and mechanisms. Circulation. 1996; 94: 2968–2974.

6. Ausma J, Wijffels M, Thone F, et al. Structural changes of atrial myocardium due to sustained atrial fibrillation in the goat. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3157–3163.

7. Ausma J, Dispersyn GD, Duimel H, et al. Changes in ultrastructural calcium distribution in goat atria during atrial fibrillation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000; 32: 355–364.

8. Frustaci A, Chimenti C, Bellocci F, et al. Histological substrate of atrial biopsies in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1180–1184.

9. Unverferth DV, Fertel RH, Unverferth BJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation in mitral stenosis: histologic, hemodynamic and metabolic factors. Int J Cardiol. 1984; 5: 143–154.

10. Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, et al. Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation. 1999; 100: 87–95.

11. Black R, White J. ADAMs: focus on the protease domain. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998; 10: 654–659.

12. Schlondorff J, Blobel CP. Metalloprotease-disintegrins: modular proteins capable of promoting cell-cell interactions and triggering signals by protein-ectodomain shedding. J Cell Sci. 1999; 112: 3603–3617.

13. Ding B, Price RL, Goldsmith EC, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy in ascending aortic stenosis mice. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2854–2862.

14. Goette A, Arndt M, Röcken C, et al. Regulation of angiotensin II receptor subtypes during atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2678–2781.

15. Beldent V, Michaud A, Wie L, et al. Proteolytic release of human angiotensin-converting enzyme: localization of the cleavage site. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 26428–26434.

16. Ramchandran R, Sen I. Cleavage processing of angiotensin-converting enzyme by a membrane-associated metalloproteinase. Biochemistry. 1995; 34: 12645–12652.

17. Santhamma KR, Sen I. Specific cellular proteins associate with angiotensin-converting enzyme and regulate its intracellular transport and cleavage-secretion. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 23253–23258.

18. Werb Z, Yan Y. A cellular striptease act. Science. 1998; 282: 1279–1280.

19. Peschon J, Slack JL, Reddy P, et al. An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science. 1998; 282: 1281–1284.

20. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987; 162: 156–159.

21. Howard L, Nelson KK, Maciewicz RA, et al. Interaction of the metalloproteinase disintegrins MDC9 and MDC15 with two SH3 domain-containing proteins, endophilin I and SH3PX1. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 31693–31699.

22. Gilpin BJ, Loechel F, Mattei MG, et al. A novel secreted form of human ADAM12 (meltrin {alpha}) provokes myogenesis in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 157–166.

23. Kurisaki T, Masuda A, Ossumi N, et al. Spatially- and temporally-restricted expression of meltrin {alpha} (ADAM12) and ß (ADAM19) in mouse embryo. Mech Dev. 1998; 73: 211–215.

24. Goette A, Staack T, Röcken C, et al. Increased expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and angiotensin-converting enzyme in human atria during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1669–1677.

25. Rogg H, de Gasparo M, Graedel E, et al. Angiotensin II-receptor subtypes in human atria and evidence for alterations in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17: 1112–1120.

26. Shirani J, Alaeddini J. Structural remodeling of the left atrial appendage in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation: implications for thrombus formation, systemic embolism, and assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2000; 9: 95–101.

27. Millichip MI, Dallas DJ, Wu E, et al. The metallo-disintegrin ADAM10 (MADM) from bovine kidney has type IV collagenase activity in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 245: 594–598.

28. Zhang XP, Kamata T, Yokoyama K, et al. Specific interaction of the recombinant disintegrin-like domain of MDC-15 (metargidin, ADAM-15) with integrin {alpha}5ß3. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 7345–7350.

29. Nath D, Slocombe PM, Webster A, et al. Meltrin {gamma} (ADAM9) mediates cellular adhesion through {alpha}6ß1, leading to a marked induction of fibroblast cell motility. J Cell Sci. 2000; 113: 2319–2328.

30. Sanfilippo AJ, Abascal VM, Sheehan M, et al. Atrial enlargement as a consequence of atrial fibrillation: a prospective echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1990; 82: 792–797.

31. White CW, Kerber RE, Weiss HR, et al. The effects of atrial fibrillation on atrial pressure-volume and flow relationships. Circ Res. 1982; 51: 205–215.

32. Cugh SS, Blackshear JL, Shen WK, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 371–378.

33. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, et al. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Med Assoc. 1994; 271: 840–844.

34. Laupacis A, Albers G, Dalen J, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1998; 114: 579S–589S.

35. Brundel BJJM, Van Gelder IC, Tuinenburg AE, et al. Endothelin system in human persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001; 12: 737–742.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. M. Manso, L. Elsherif, S.-M. Kang, and R. S. Ross
Integrins, membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases and ADAMs: Potential implications for cardiac remodeling
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2006; 69(3): 574 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. W.M. Fedak, C. S. Moravec, P. M. McCarthy, S. M. Altamentova, A. P. Wong, M. Skrtic, S. Verma, R. D. Weisel, and R.-K. Li
Altered Expression of Disintegrin Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitor in Human Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, January 17, 2006; 113(2): 238 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. Anne, R. Willems, T. Roskams, P. Sergeant, P. Herijgers, P. Holemans, H. Ector, and H. Heidbuchel
Matrix metalloproteinases and atrial remodeling in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2005; 67(4): 655 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. M. Lalu, E. Pasini, C. J. Schulze, M. Ferrari-Vivaldi, G. Ferrari-Vivaldi, T. Bachetti, and R. Schulz
Ischaemia-reperfusion injury activates matrix metalloproteinases in the human heart
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 27 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. Hanna, S. Cardin, T.-K. Leung, and S. Nattel
Differences in atrial versus ventricular remodeling in dogs with ventricular tachypacing-induced congestive heart failure
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2004; 63(2): 236 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Nakano, S. Niida, K. Dote, S. Takenaka, H. Hirao, F. Miura, M. Ishida, T. Shingu, T. Sueda, M. Yoshizumi, et al.
Matrix metalloproteinase-9 contributes to human atrial remodeling during atrial fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 818 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. D. Hoit
Matrix metalloproteinases and atrial structural remodeling
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 345 - 347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Marin, V. Roldan, V. Climent, A. Garcia, P. Marco, and G. Y.H. Lip
Is Thrombogenesis in Atrial Fibrillation Related to Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Its Inhibitor, TIMP-1?
Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1181 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. A. Hintz, A. J. Rassias, K. Wardwell, M. L. Moss, P. M. Morganelli, P. A. Pioli, A. L. Givan, P. K. Wallace, M. P. Yeager, and P. M. Guyre
Endotoxin induces rapid metalloproteinase-mediated shedding followed by up-regulation of the monocyte hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163
J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2002; 72(4): 711 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
Y. Shizukuda and P. M. Buttrick
Oxygen free radicals and heart failure: new insight into an old question
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): L237 - L238.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Goette, M. Arndt, C. Rocken, T. Staack, R. Bechtloff, D. Reinhold, C. Huth, S. Ansorge, H. U. Klein, and U. Lendeckel
Calpains and cytokines in fibrillating human atria
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): H264 - H272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/6/720    most recent
hc0602.103639v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arndt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goette, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arndt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goette, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies