Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;105:e29

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Poon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Poon, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2002;105:e29.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Coating Stents With Antirestenotic Drugs: The Blunderbuss or the Magic Bullet?

Harry C. Lowe, MD; Levon M. Khachigian, PhD

Centre for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, L.Khachigian@unsw.edu.au

To the Editor:

We read with interest a recent article in Circulation that reported that the binding protein (FK506BP12) for the drug sirolimus (rapamycin) is up-regulated in in-stent restenotic tissue.1 This fact correlates with the observation that stents coated with sirolimus are associated with very low rates of neointima formation.2 These studies suggest a mechanism of action for this immunosuppressive, antineoplastic, and antifungal agent in the context of in-stent restenosis and provide proof-of-principle evidence that stent-based drug delivery can be achieved. Sirolimus therapy to date has been associated with a generally low incidence of side effects and toxicity.

The mechanisms of action of sirolimus are not entirely understood, but are thought to involve inhibition of mitogen-induced downregulation of p27Kip1 and p70s6K phosphorylation. Recently, however, Sun et al3 reported in Circulation that rapamycin inhibition of smooth muscle cell migration is both p27Kip1- and p70s6K-dependent and independent. At the present time this drug, like Tranilast and Paclitaxel (taxol), which are also under investigation as antirestenotic agents, might be regarded as a "blunderbuss" because the mechanisms of action of these drugs do not appear to be gene-specific and are incompletely understood.

The opposite approach, the "magic bullet," is to selectively target a specific gene or process that plays a pivotal role in the response to injury. One example is the immediate-early gene and zinc finger transcription factor, Egr-1. Using sequence-specific catalytic DNA molecules, or "DNAzymes," that selectively target and cleave a specific site in Egr-1 mRNA, we have demonstrated reduced neointima formation after balloon angioplasty to rat carotid arteries4 and stenting in pig coronary arteries.5 Now, using human internal mammary arterial explants in an ex vivo model of intimal thickening, DzA (at 400 nmol/L final concentration), a DNAzyme targeting the 5' region of human EGR-1 mRNA,5 could inhibit neointima formation in these segments compared with a non-cleaving DNAzyme (DzE) targeting the same gene. In this respect, neointima:media ratios (± SEM) were 0.06 (0.01) for DzA (P<0.05 using a Wilcoxen signed rank test for paired data compared with all other groups), 0.09 (0.03) for DzE, 0.08 (0.02) for the drug vehicle control, and 0.09 (0.02) for the control (no vehicle)(n=5 for each group).

So far, in the short-term and in small patient numbers, the promise of inhibiting restenosis using what might be a blunderbuss approach is clearly encouraging. However, it may be clinically more appealing to locally deliver gene-specific magic bullets (such as DNAzymes) in efforts to inhibit intimal regrowth with potentially greater specificity, decreased toxicity, and fewer side effects.

References

1. Zohlnhofer D, Klein CA, Richter T, et al. Gene expression profiling of human stent-induced neointima by cDNA array analysis of microscopic specimens retrieved by helix cutter atherectomy: detection of FK506-binding protein 12 upregulation. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1396–1402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries. Circulation. 2001; 103: 192–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Sun J, Marx SO, Chen H-J, et al. Role for p27Kip1 in vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2967–2972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Santiago FS, Lowe HC, Kavurma MM, et al. Novel DNA enzyme targeting NGFI-A mRNA inhibits vascular smooth muscle proliferation and regrowth after injury. Nature Medicine. 1999; 5: 1264–1269.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Lowe HC, Fahmy RG, Kavurma MM, et al. Catalytic oligodeoxynucleotides define a critical regulatory role for early growth response factor-1 in porcine coronary in-stent restenosis. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 670–677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

Response

Ji Sun, PhD; Steven O. Marx, MD; Hong-Jun Chen, MD; Andrew R. Marks, MD; LeRoy E. Rabbani, MD

Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY

Michael Poon, MD

Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Drs Lowe and Khachigian suggest that the coating of stents with drugs including sirolimus is a "blunderbuss" approach, whereas the use of a DNAzyme such as one they are studying that cleaves Egr-1 mRNA is the "magic bullet," with "potentially greater specificity, decreased toxicity and with fewer side effects." Elsewhere Drs Lowe and colleagues1 refer to the target of their "magic bullet" as follows: "Early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1) controls the expression of a growing number of genes involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and postangioplasty restenosis. Egr-1 is activated by diverse proatherogenic stimuli." It is not clear how targeting a transcription factor that controls "a growing number of genes" and is activated by "diverse" stimuli is more specific than rapamycin.

Over the past decade, many of the details regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying rapamycin’s actions have been elucidated, and these basic investigations are ongoing.2,3 At the same time, it is important to note that rapamycin has been approved by the FDA for long-term systemic administration as an immunosuppressant, indicating a degree of safety not yet demonstrated in humans for Egr-1 targeting by DNAzymes. Interestingly, Egr-1 deficient mice have been reported to be hyperresponsive to stress and infertile.4,5 Findings such as these suggest that a "magic bullet" targeted at Egr-1 could itself have unfortunate side effects and requires extensive in vivo testing before it is administered to patients.

References

1. Lowe HC, Fahmy RG, Kavurma MM, et al. Catalytic oligodeoxynucleotides define a key regulatory role for early growth response factor-1 in the porcine model of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 670–677.

2. Marx SO, Marks AR. Bench to bedside: the development of rapamycin and its application to stent restenosis. Circulation. 2001; 104: 852–855.[Free Full Text]

3. Sun J, Marx SO, Chen H-J, et al. Role for p27Kip1 in vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2967–2972.

4. Saadane N, Alpert L, Chalifour LE. Altered molecular response to adrenoreceptor-induced cardiac hypertrophy in Egr-1-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 278: H796–805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Lee SL, Sadovsky Y, Swirnoff AH, et al. Luteinizing hormone deficiency and female infertility in mice lacking the transcription factor NGFI-A (Egr-1). Science. 1996; 273: 1219–1221.[Abstract]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Poon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Poon, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease