doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975
(Circulation. 2002;105:539.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
AHA Scientific Statement |
Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart
A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association
, American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging:
From the American Society of Echocardiography (S.K., T.J.R., N.J.W.), the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (M.D.C., V.D., M.S.V.), the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (J.A.R.), the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (A.K.J., W.K.L.), and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (D.J.P).
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements • tomography • imaging • perfusion • myocardium
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 Top Introduction Orientation of the HeartReferences |
|---|
Nuclear cardiology, echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac computed tomography (CT), positron emission computed tomography (PET), and coronary angiography are imaging modalities that have been used to measure myocardial perfusion, left ventricular function, and coronary anatomy for clinical management and research. Although there are technical differences between these modalities, all of them image the myocardium and the adjacent cavity. However, the orientation of the heart, angle selection for cardiac planes, number of segments, slice display and thickness, nomenclature for segments, and assignment of segments to coronary arterial territories have evolved independently within each field. This evolution has been based on the inherent strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the practical clinical application of these modalities as they are used for patient management. This independent evolution has resulted in a lack of standardization and has made accurate intra- and cross-modality comparisons for clinical patient management and research very difficult, if not, at times, impossible.
Attempts to standardize these options for all cardiac imaging modalities should be based on the sound principles that have evolved from cardiac anatomy and clinical needs.1–3 Selection of standardized methods must be based on the following criteria:
- (1) Maintain consistency with accepted anatomic and autopsy data.
- (2) Utilize, as much as possible, existing and accepted approaches to myocardial segmentation and nomenclature.
- (3) Allow precise localization by using anatomic landmarks whenever possible.
- (4) Provide adequate sampling of the left ventricle and coronary distribution without exceeding the resolution limits of the imaging modalities or relevance for clinical and research applications.
- (5) Allow linkage of the segments to known coronary arterial topography as defined by coronary angiography.
- (2) Utilize, as much as possible, existing and accepted approaches to myocardial segmentation and nomenclature.
An earlier special report from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine4 defined standards for plane selection and display orientation for serial myocardial slices generated by cardiac 2-dimensional (2D) or tomographic imaging. The plane selection and slice display orientation are shown in Figure 1. In these standards, recommendations were not made for echocardiography. The American Society of Echocardiography and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology also have made specific recommendations for their respective modalities.5,6 Best-practice guidelines for CMR have been published.7 To optimize and facilitate communication between cardiac imaging modalities for research and clinical applications, consensus recommendations will be made for the following: orientation of the heart, names for cardiac planes, number of myocardial segments, selection and thickness of cardiac slices for display and analysis, nomenclature and location of segments, and assignment of segments to coronary arterial territories. These recommendations are applicable for imaging myocardial perfusion and wall motion.
|
|
Orientation of the Heart |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionOrientation of the HeartReferences |
|---|
Digital cross-sectional or tomographic imaging modalities such as body CT and MR traditionally oriented and displayed the body using planes that were parallel or at 90° angles to the long axis of the body, called transaxial or body-plane orthogonal views. The cardiac planes generated by using the long axis of the body do not cleanly transect the ventricles, atria, or myocardial regions supplied by the major coronary arteries. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 2D echocardiography, the two most widely used cardiac imaging modalities, have defined and oriented the heart for display at 90° relative to the long axis of the left ventricle that transects the apex and the center of the mitral valve plane.5,6,8 This approach maintains the integrity of the cardiac chambers and the distribution of coronary arterial blood flow to the myocardium. For these reasons, this approach is optimal for use in research and for clinical patient management involving cardiac perfusion and function.
Recommendation
All cardiac imaging modalities should define, orient, and display the heart using the long axis of the left ventricle and selected planes oriented at 90° angles relative to the long axis.
Name for Cardiac Planes
The nomenclature of short, vertical long, and horizontal long axes has been used for the cardiac planes generated by SPECT, PET, cardiac CT, and CMR.4 As shown in Figure 1, these planes are oriented at 90° angles relative to each other. For transthoracic 2D echocardiography, a similar system of 90° planes has been recommended and is used widely (Figure 2). In the echocardiographic system, the parasternal short-axis plane approximates the short-axis views in the other modalities. The apical 2-chamber echocardiographic view approximates the vertical long-axis view. The apical 4-chamber echocardiographic view approximates the horizontal long-axis view.6,8,9 With the advent of transesophageal echocardiography and the use of echocardiographic contrast agents for measuring myocardial perfusion, additional planes for echocardiography may be necessary in the future.
|
Recommendation
The names for the 90°-oriented cardiac planes used in all imaging modalities should be short axis, vertical long axis, and horizontal long axis. These correspond to the short-axis, apical 2-chamber, and apical 4-chamber planes traditionally used in 2D echocardiography.
Number of Segments
The muscle and cavity of the left ventricle can be divided into a variable number of segments. Two-dimensional echocardiography and SPECT nuclear cardiology have developed and published segmentation systems based on clinical application and the strengths and limitations of the modalities.5,6,8 Segmentation efforts in CMR and cardiac CT generally have included a larger number of segments (48 to 144), which exceed practical clinical application.10 For CMR, 9 segments have been used for clinical applications and up to 400 segments for research.
Autopsy studies provide precise data on the mass and size of the myocardium, and this should serve as the basis for division of the heart.1 In 102 adults without cardiac disease, the heart was sectioned into apical, mid-cavity, and basal thirds perpendicular to the left ventricular long axis, and the measured myocardial mass for each of these ventricular thirds was 42% for the base, 36% for the mid-cavity, and 21% for the apex.1 The 17-segment model, shown in Figure 3, creates a distribution of 35%, 35%, and 30% for the basal, mid-cavity, and apical thirds of the heart, which is close to the observed autopsy data.
|
The recommendation for the number of myocardial segments for echocardiography had originally been 20, but was subsequently reduced to 16 segments.6,9 Both the 20- and 16-segment systems were developed mainly for analysis of regional left ventricular wall motion and did not include a true apical myocardial segment devoid of cavity. With the development of echocardiographic contrast agents for the assessment of myocardial perfusion, the myocardial apex segment or apical cap beyond the left ventricular cavity becomes pertinent, and a 17-segment model may become more appropriate for both the assessment of wall motion and myocardial perfusion with echocardiography.
SPECT nuclear cardiology studies can be displayed using 17 or 20 segments. The 20-segment model divides the left ventricle into basal, mid-cavity, and apical thirds and includes 2 segments for the apical cap. This segmentation results in a 30% contribution from the base, 30% from the mid-cavity, and 40% from the apex and apical cap.5 Thus, the 20-segment model overrepresents the apex when compared with the anatomic data.1 The 17-segment model provides the best agreement with the available anatomic data and has the best fit with the methods commonly used in both echocardiography and SPECT nuclear cardiology.
Recommendation
The heart should be divided into 17 segments for assessment of the myocardium and the left ventricular cavity.
Selection and Thickness of Cardiac Slices for Display
For regional analysis of left ventricular function or myocardial perfusion, the left ventricle should be divided into equal thirds perpendicular to the long axis of the heart. This will generate 3 circular basal, mid-cavity, and apical short-axis slices of the left ventricle. For echocardiography, as shown in Figure 3, the basal third should be acquired and displayed from the area extending from the mitral annulus to the tips of the papillary muscles at end diastole. The mid-cavity view should be selected from the region that includes the entire length of the papillary muscles. The apical short-axis view should be selected from the area beyond the papillary muscles to just before the cavity ends. The true apex or apical cap is the area of myocardium beyond the end of the left ventricular cavity.
For the other imaging modalities, slices of variable thickness in the 3 orthogonal views should be generated and reviewed. The thickness should be <1 cm, but little value is gained by having cuts finer than 3 to 6 mm. Because of the complex mixing of myocardium and connective tissue at the base of the heart, especially the septum, only slices containing myocardium in all 360° should be selected. Representative basal, mid-cavity, and apical slices from the short-axis views should be selected for analysis. An alternative method is to sum slices to create just 3 thick short-axis slices. The true apex, consisting of the apical cap, can be evaluated from the vertical and horizontal long-axis planes for all imaging modalities.
Recommendation
The heart should be divided into equal thirds perpendicular to the long axis. Anatomic landmarks should be used to select slices, and the slice thickness should be selected on the basis of modality-specific resolution and clinical relevance.
Nomenclature and Location
Myocardial segments should be named and localized with reference to both the long axes of the ventricle and the 360° circumferential locations on the short-axis views. Using basal, mid-cavity, and apical as part of the name defines the location along the long axis of the ventricle from the apex to base. With regard to the circumferential location, the basal and mid-cavity slices should be divided into 6 segments of 60° each, as shown in Figure 3. The attachment of the right ventricular wall to the left ventricle should be used to identify and separate the septum from the left ventricular anterior and inferior free walls. Figure 4 shows the location and the recommended names for the 17 myocardial segments on a bull’s-eye display. The names basal, mid-cavity, and apical identify the location on the long axis of the left ventricle. The circumferential locations in the basal and mid-cavity are anterior, anteroseptal, inferoseptal, inferior, inferolateral, and anterolateral.
|
Using this system, segments 1 and 7 identify the locations of the anterior wall at the base and mid-cavity. The appropriate names are basal anterior and mid-anterior segments. The septum, delineated by the attachment of the right ventricle, is divided into anterior and inferior segments. Segments 2 and 3 are named basal anteroseptal and basal inferoseptal.
Continuing this approach, segment 4 is the basal inferior, segment 5 is the basal inferolateral, and segment 6 is the basal anterolateral. Similar names are used for the 6 segments, 7 to 12, at the mid-cavity level. The left ventricle tapers as it approaches the true apex, and it was believed appropriate to use just 4 segments. The names for segments 13 to 16 are apical anterior, apical septal, apical inferior, and apical lateral. The apical cap represents the true muscle at the extreme tip of the ventricle where there is no longer cavity present, and this is defined as segment 17, called the apex.
Although in echocardiography the term posterior is sometimes used, for consistency, the term inferior is recommended.6
Recommendation
The names for the myocardial segments should define the location relative to the long axis of the heart and the circumferential location.
Assignment of Segments to Coronary Arterial Territories
Although there is tremendous variability in the coronary artery blood supply to myocardial segments, it was believed to be appropriate to assign individual segments to specific coronary artery territories.11 The assignment of the 17 segments to one of the 3 major coronary arteries is shown in Figure 5. The greatest variability in myocardial blood supply occurs at the apical cap, segment 17, which can be supplied by any of the 3 arteries. Segments 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, and 17 are assigned to the left anterior descending coronary artery distribution. Segments 3, 4, 9, 10, and 15 are assigned to the right coronary artery when it is dominant. Segments 5, 6, 11, 12, and 16 generally are assigned to the left circumflex artery.
|
Recommendation
Individual myocardial segments can be assigned to the 3 major coronary arteries with the recognition that there is anatomic variability.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.
This statement was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in September 2001. A single reprint is available by calling 800-242-8721 (US only) or writing the American Heart Association, Public Information, 7272 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75231-4596. Ask for reprint No. 71-0218. To purchase additional reprints: up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-8521, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail mrayfiel@lww.com. To make photocopies for personal or educational use, call the Copyright Clearance Center, 978-750-8400.
Dr Mario S. Verani passed away on October 30, 2001.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionOrientation of the HeartReferences |
|---|
1. Edwards WD, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Standardized nomenclature and anatomic basis for regional tomographic analysis of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc. 1981; 56: 479–497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Waller BF, Taliercio CP, Slack JD, et al. Tomographic views of normal and abnormal hearts: the anatomic basis for various cardiac imaging techniques, Part I. Clin Cardiol. 1990; 13: 804–812.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Waller BF, Taliercio CP, Slack JD, et al. Tomographic views of normal and abnormal hearts: the anatomic basis for various cardiac imaging techniques, Part II. Clin Cardiol. 1990; 13: 877–884.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. Circulation. 1992; 86: 338–339.
5. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, Part 2. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999; 6: G47–G84.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989; 2: 358–367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ. Ventricular Function. In: Manning WJ, Pennell DJ, eds. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2001: 99–111.
8. Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1994.
9.
Henry WL, DeMaria A, Gramiak R, et al. Report of the American society of echocardiography committee on nomenclature and standards in two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1980; 62: 212–215.
10. Rumberger JA, Behrenbeck T, Breen JR, et al. Nonparallel changes in global left ventricular chamber volume and muscle mass during the first year after transmural myocardial infarction in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 673–682.[Abstract]
11. Gallik DM, Obermueller SD, Swarna US, et al. Simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function during transient coronary occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1529–1538.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  Y. Shudo, K. Taniguchi, K. Takeda, T. Sakaguchi, H. Matsue, H. Izutani, G. Matsumiya, and Y. Sawa Assessment of regional myocardial wall stress before and after surgical correction of functional ischaemic mitral regurgitation using multidetector computed tomography and novel software system. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 38(2): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S.-Y. Chung, K.-Y. Lee, E. J. Chun, W.-W. Lee, E. K. Park, H.-J. Chang, and S. I. Choi Comparison of Stress Perfusion MRI and SPECT for Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Angiographically Proven Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2010; 195(2): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Cheng, M. Zeng, C. Arellano, W. Mafori, J. Goldin, M. Krishnam, and S. G. Ruehm Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities: standard dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography versus rest/stress technetium-99m single-photo emission CT Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2010; 83(992): 652 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Chelliah, B. Anantharam, L. Burden, A. Alhajiri, and R. Senior Independent and incremental value of stress echocardiography over clinical and stress electrocardiographic parameters for the prediction of hard cardiac events in new-onset suspected angina with no history of coronary artery disease Eur J Echocardiogr, July 28, 2010; (2010) jeq086v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Grenne, C. Eek, B. Sjoli, T. Dahlslett, M. Uchto, P. K. Hol, H. Skulstad, O. A. Smiseth, T. Edvardsen, and H. Brunvand Acute coronary occlusion in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: outcome and early identification by strain echocardiography Heart, July 18, 2010; (2010) hrt.2009.188391v1. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Szmigielski, K. Rajpoot, V. Grau, S. G. Myerson, C. Holloway, J. A. Noble, R. Kerber, and H. Becher Real-Time 3D Fusion Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2010; 3(7): 682 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Manka, V. Vitanis, P. Boesiger, A. J. Flammer, S. Plein, and S. Kozerke Clinical Feasibility of Accelerated, High Spatial Resolution Myocardial Perfusion Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2010; 3(7): 710 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. Gerber, J. Darchis, J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, G. Legros, A.-C. Pouleur, D. Vancraeynest, A. Pasquet, and J.-L. Vanoverschelde Relationship Between Transmural Extent of Necrosis and Quantitative Recovery of Regional Strains After Revascularization J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2010; 3(7): 720 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. P. Weir, C. A. Murphy, C. J. Petrie, T. N. Martin, S. Balmain, S. Clements, T. Steedman, G. S. Wagner, H. J. Dargie, and J. J. V. McMurray Microvascular Obstruction Remains a Portent of Adverse Remodeling in Optimally Treated Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2010; 3(4): 360 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. G. Masci, M. Marinelli, M. Piacenti, V. Lorenzoni, V. Positano, M. Lombardi, A. L'Abbate, and D. Neglia Myocardial Structural, Perfusion, and Metabolic Correlates of Left Bundle Branch Block Mechanical Derangement in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Tagged Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography Study Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2010; 3(4): 482 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. K. Seneviratne, Q. A. Truong, F. Bamberg, I. S. Rogers, M. D. Shapiro, C. L. Schlett, C. U. Chae, R. Cury, S. Abbara, T. J. Brady, et al. Incremental Diagnostic Value of Regional Left Ventricular Function Over Coronary Assessment by Cardiac Computed Tomography for the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Acute Chest Pain: From the ROMICAT Trial Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2010; 3(4): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Reyes, J. Stirrup, M. Roughton, S. D'Souza, S. R. Underwood, and C. Anagnostopoulos Attenuation of Adenosine-Induced Myocardial Perfusion Heterogeneity by Atenolol and Other Cardioselective {beta}-Adrenoceptor Blockers: A Crossover Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Study J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2010; 51(7): 1036 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Eek, B. Grenne, H. Brunvand, S. Aakhus, K. Endresen, O. A. Smiseth, T. Edvardsen, and H. Skulstad Strain echocardiography predicts acute coronary occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2010; 11(6): 501 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.-f. Cheung, W.-j. Hong, G. C. F. Chan, S. J. Wong, and S.-y. Ha Left ventricular myocardial deformation and mechanical dyssynchrony in children with normal ventricular shortening fraction after anthracycline therapy Heart, July 1, 2010; 96(14): 1137 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Boogers, C. J. W. Borleffs, M. M. Henneman, R. J. van Bommel, J. van Ramshorst, E. Boersma, P. Dibbets-Schneider, M. P. Stokkel, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, et al. Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation Assessed With 123-Iodine Metaiodobenzylguanidine Imaging Predicts Ventricular Arrhythmias in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2010; 55(24): 2769 - 2777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Wilson, R. O'Hanlon, S. Prasad, D. Oxborough, R. Godfrey, F. Alpendurada, G. Smith, J. Wong, S. Basavarajaiah, S. Sharma, et al. Biological markers of cardiac damage are not related to measures of cardiac systolic and diastolic function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography after an acute bout of prolonged endurance exercise Br. J. Sports Med., June 11, 2010; (2010) bjsm.2009.064089v2. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Larose, J. Rodes-Cabau, P. Pibarot, S. Rinfret, G. Proulx, C. M. Nguyen, J. P. Dery, O. Gleeton, L. Roy, B. Noel, et al. Predicting Late Myocardial Recovery and Outcomes in the Early Hours of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Traditional Measures Compared With Microvascular Obstruction, Salvaged Myocardium, and Necrosis Characteristics by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2010; 55(22): 2459 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. V. Raman, O. P. Simonetti, M. W. Winner III, J. A. Dickerson, X. He, E. L. Mazzaferri Jr, and G. Ambrosio Cardiac Magnetic Resonance With Edema Imaging Identifies Myocardium at Risk and Predicts Worse Outcome in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2010; 55(22): 2480 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. W. Kirschbaum, A. Rossi, R. T. van Domburg, K. Gruszczynska, G. P. Krestin, P. W. Serruys, D. J. Duncker, P. J. de Feyter, and R.-J. M. van Geuns Contractile Reserve in Segments With Nontransmural Infarction in Chronic Dysfunctional Myocardium Using Low-Dose Dobutamine CMR J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., June 1, 2010; 3(6): 614 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. W. Wu, Y. H. Chen, S. S. Wang, H. Y. Jui, R. F. Yen, K. Y. Tzen, M. F. Chen, and C. M. Lee PET Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Inversely Correlates with Intravascular Ultrasound Findings in Angiographically Normal Cardiac Transplant Recipients J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2010; 51(6): 906 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Bodi, O. Husser, J. Sanchis, J. Nunez, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, J. V. Monmeneu, L. Mainar, F. Chaustre, G. A. J. Riegger, M. J. Bosch, et al. Contractile Reserve and Extent of Transmural Necrosis in the Setting of Myocardial Stunning: Comparison at Cardiac MR Imaging Radiology, June 1, 2010; 255(3): 755 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Feneck, J. Kneeshaw, K. Fox, D. Bettex, J. Erb, F. Flaschkampf, F. Guarracino, M. Ranucci, M. Seeberger, E. Sloth, et al. Recommendations for reporting perioperative transoesophageal echo studies Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2010; 11(5): 387 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Dubois, X. Liu, P. Claus, G. Marsboom, P. Pokreisz, S. Vandenwijngaert, H. Depelteau, W. Streb, L. Chaothawee, F. Maes, et al. Differential effects of progenitor cell populations on left ventricular remodeling and myocardial neovascularization after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 18, 2010; 55(20): 2232 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Jacobson, R. Senior, M. D. Cerqueira, N. D. Wong, G. S. Thomas, V. A. Lopez, D. Agostini, F. Weiland, H. Chandna, J. Narula, et al. Myocardial Iodine-123 Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine Imaging and Cardiac Events in Heart Failure: Results of the Prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 18, 2010; 55(20): 2212 - 2221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Becker, E. Altiok, C. Ocklenburg, R. Krings, D. Adams, M. Lysansky, B. Vogel, P. Schauerte, C. Knackstedt, and R. Hoffmann Analysis of LV Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Different Imaging Modalities J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2010; 3(5): 472 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. T. Ortiz-Perez, D. C. Lee, S. N. Meyers, C. J. Davidson, R. O. Bonow, and E. Wu Determinants of Myocardial Salvage During Acute Myocardial Infarction: Evaluation With a Combined Angiographic and CMR Myocardial Salvage Index J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2010; 3(5): 491 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Jain, M. L. Shehata, M. Stuber, S. J. Berkowitz, H. Calkins, J. A. C. Lima, D. A. Bluemke, and H. Tandri Prevalence of Left Ventricular Regional Dysfunction in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia: A Tagged MRI Study Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2010; 3(3): 290 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. T. George, T. Ichihara, J. A. C. Lima, and A. C. Lardo A Method for Reconstructing the Arterial Input Function during Helical CT: Implications for Myocardial Perfusion Distribution Imaging Radiology, May 1, 2010; 255(2): 396 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, L. Mainar, F. J. Chorro, J. Nunez, J. V. Monmeneu, F. Chaustre, M. J. Forteza, A. Ruiz-Sauri, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, et al. Right ventricular involvement in anterior myocardial infarction: a translational approach Cardiovasc Res, April 13, 2010; (2010) cvq091v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Korosoglou, S. Lehrke, A. Wochele, B. Hoerig, D. Lossnitzer, H. Steen, E. Giannitsis, N. F. Osman, and H. A. Katus Strain-Encoded CMR for the Detection of Inducible Ischemia During Intermediate Stress J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2010; 3(4): 361 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Jahnke, R. Gebker, R. Manka, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch Navigator-Gated 3D Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent CMR at 3.0-T for Detection of Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemic Reactions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2010; 3(4): 375 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Gebker, C. Jahnke, T. Hucko, R. Manka, J. G. Mirelis, A. Hamdan, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch Dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease in women Heart, April 1, 2010; 96(8): 616 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. van Melle, P. A. van der Vleuten, Y. M. Hummel, R. Nijveldt, R. A. Tio, A. A. Voors, and F. Zijlstra Predictive value of tissue Doppler imaging for left ventricular ejection fraction, remodelling, and infarct size after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction Eur J Echocardiogr, March 7, 2010; (2010) jeq023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Melikian, P. De Bondt, P. Tonino, O. De Winter, E. Wyffels, J. Bartunek, G. R. Heyndrickx, W. F. Fearon, N. H.J. Pijls, W. Wijns, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Angiographic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., March 1, 2010; 3(3): 307 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Eek, B. Grenne, H. Brunvand, S. Aakhus, K. Endresen, P. K. Hol, H.-J. Smith, O. A. Smiseth, T. Edvardsen, and H. Skulstad Strain Echocardiography and Wall Motion Score Index Predicts Final Infarct Size in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2010; 3(2): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. van Werkhoven, M. W. Heijenbrok, J. D. Schuijf, J. W. Jukema, E. E. van der Wall, J. H. M. Schreur, and J. J. Bax Combined non-invasive anatomical and functional assessment with MSCT and MRI for the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood Heart, March 1, 2010; 96(6): 425 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. I. Ahmed, J. D. Gladden, S. H. Litovsky, S. G. Lloyd, H. Gupta, S. Inusah, T. Denney Jr, P. Powell, D. C. McGiffin, and L. J. Dell'Italia Increased Oxidative Stress and Cardiomyocyte Myofibrillar Degeneration in Patients With Chronic Isolated Mitral Regurgitation and Ejection Fraction >60% J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 16, 2010; 55(7): 671 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. C.T. Ng, D. T. Tran, C. Allman, J. Vidaic, and D. Y. Leung Prognostic implications of left ventricular dyssynchrony early after non-ST elevation myocardial infarction without congestive heart failure Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2010; 31(3): 298 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Javadi, R. Lautamaki, J. Merrill, C. Voicu, W. Epley, G. McBride, and F. M. Bengel Definition of Vascular Territories on Myocardial Perfusion Images by Integration with True Coronary Anatomy: A Hybrid PET/CT Analysis J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 198 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Rocha-Filho, R. Blankstein, L. D. Shturman, H. G. Bezerra, D. R. Okada, I. S. Rogers, B. Ghoshhajra, U. Hoffmann, G. Feuchtner, W. S. Mamuya, et al. Incremental Value of Adenosine-induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Dual-Source CT at Cardiac CT Angiography Radiology, February 1, 2010; 254(2): 410 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. J. Groothuis, A. M. Beek, S. L. Brinckman, M. R. Meijerink, S. C. Koestner, R. Nijveldt, M. J. W. Gotte, M. B. M. Hofman, C. van Kuijk, and A. C. van Rossum Low to Intermediate Probability of Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography with First-Pass MR Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Radiology, February 1, 2010; 254(2): 384 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. W. Sharkey, D. C. Windenburg, J. R. Lesser, M. S. Maron, R. G. Hauser, J. N. Lesser, T. S. Haas, J. S. Hodges, and B. J. Maron Natural History and Expansive Clinical Profile of Stress (Tako-Tsubo) Cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 26, 2010; 55(4): 333 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A.P. Weir, A. M. Miller, G. E.J. Murphy, S. Clements, T. Steedman, J. M.C. Connell, I. B. McInnes, H. J. Dargie, and J. J.V. McMurray Serum Soluble ST2: A Potential Novel Mediator in Left Ventricular and Infarct Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 19, 2010; 55(3): 243 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. D. Gillam Automated Versus Visual Segmental Scoring: Are We Ready to Replace the Art of Regional Wall Motion Assessment? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2010; 3(1): 5 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Iwase, S. Takao, M. Akaike, K. Adachi, Y. Sumitomo-Ueda, S. Yagi, T. Niki, K. Kusunose, N. Tomita, Y. Hirata, et al. Diagnostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance for detection of cardiac involvement in female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy Heart Asia, January 1, 2010; 2(1): 52 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Mollema, V. Delgado, M. Bertini, M. L. Antoni, E. Boersma, E. R. Holman, M. P.M. Stokkel, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, and J. J. Bax Viability Assessment With Global Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Predicts Recovery of Left Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2010; 3(1): 15 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. D. Karamitsos, L. Leccisotti, J. R. Arnold, A. Recio-Mayoral, P. Bhamra-Ariza, R. K. Howells, N. Searle, M. D. Robson, O. E. Rimoldi, P. G. Camici, et al. Relationship Between Regional Myocardial Oxygenation and Perfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2010; 3(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Foll, B. Jung, E. Schilli, F. Staehle, A. Geibel, J. Hennig, C. Bode, and M. Markl Magnetic Resonance Tissue Phase Mapping of Myocardial Motion: New Insight in Age and Gender Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2010; 3(1): 54 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-M Ko, Y-J Kim, J-H Park, and N-M Choi Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2010; 83(985): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. H. Davarpanah, Y.-P. Chen, A. Kino, C. T. Farrelly, A. N. Keeling, J. J. Sheehan, A. B. Ragin, P. J. Weale, S. Zuehlsdorff, and J. C. Carr Accelerated Two- and Three-dimensional Cine MR Imaging of the Heart by Using a 32-Channel Coil Radiology, January 1, 2010; 254(1): 98 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Kusakari, C.-Y. Xiao, N. Himes, S. D. Kinsella, M. Takahashi, A. Rosenzweig, and T. Matsui Myocyte injury along myofibers in left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2009; 9(6): 951 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Baccouche, H. Mahrholdt, G. Meinhardt, R. Merher, M. Voehringer, S. Hill, K. Klingel, R. Kandolf, U. Sechtem, and A. Yilmaz Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2009; 30(23): 2869 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Valle-Munoz, J. Estornell-Erill, C. J. Soriano-Navarro, M. Nadal-Barange, N. Martinez-Alzamora, F. Pomar-Domingo, M. Corbi-Pascual, R. Paya-Serrano, and F. Ridocci-Soriano Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance identifies coronary artery disease as the aetiology of left ventricular dysfunction in acute new-onset congestive heart failure Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2009; 10(8): 968 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Gebauer, V. Tomek, P. Kubus, V. Razek, T. Matejka, A. Salameh, M. Kostelka, and J. Janousek Differential effects of the site of permanent epicardial pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in the young: implications for lead placement Europace, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1654 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A-L Hachulla, D Launay, V Gaxotte, P de Groote, N Lamblin, P Devos, P-Y Hatron, J-P Beregi, and E Hachulla Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional observational study of 52 patients Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2009; 68(12): 1878 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Watkins, R. McGeoch, J. Lyne, T. Steedman, R. Good, M.-J. McLaughlin, T. Cunningham, V. Bezlyak, I. Ford, H. J. Dargie, et al. Validation of Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Fractional Flow Reserve for the Detection of Significant Coronary Heart Disease Circulation, December 1, 2009; 120(22): 2207 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kelle, S. D. Roes, C. Klein, T. Kokocinski, A. de Roos, E. Fleck, J. J. Bax, and E. Nagel Prognostic value of myocardial infarct size and contractile reserve using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 3, 2009; 54(19): 1770 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Bernhardt, J. Spiess, B. Levenson, G. Pilz, B. Hofling, V. Hombach, and O. Strohm Combined Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Bypass Grafts: A Multicenter Study of an Integrated Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Protocol J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., November 1, 2009; 2(11): 1292 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Bastarrika, Y. S. Lee, W. Huda, B. Ruzsics, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf CT of Coronary Artery Disease Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 317 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H. Al-Mallah, R. Hachamovitch, S. Dorbala, and M. F. Di Carli Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients Referred to Stress Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography With Renal Dysfunction Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2009; 2(6): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kino, S. Zuehlsdorff, J. J. Sheehan, P. J. Weale, T. J. Carroll, R. Jerecic, and J. C. Carr Three-Dimensional Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery Turbo FLASH Sequence for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): W381 - W388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Pepe, V Positano, M Capra, A Maggio, C L Pinto, A Spasiano, G Forni, G Derchi, B Favilli, G Rossi, et al. Myocardial scarring by delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in thalassaemia major Heart, October 15, 2009; 95(20): 1688 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S S Abdelmoneim, A Dhoble, M Bernier, S Moir, M E Hagen, S A C Ness, S S Abdel-Kader, P A Pellikka, and S L Mulvagh Absolute myocardial blood flow determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography Heart, October 15, 2009; 95(20): 1662 - 1668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Steel, R. Broderick, V. Gandla, E. Larose, F. Resnic, M. Jerosch-Herold, K. A. Brown, and R. Y. Kwong Complementary Prognostic Values of Stress Myocardial Perfusion and Late Gadolinium Enhancement Imaging by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, October 6, 2009; 120(14): 1390 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Akar, S. Durdu, M. Arat, M. Kilickap, N. O. Kucuk, O. Arslan, I. Kuzu, and U. Ozyurda Five-year follow-up after transepicardial implantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells to ungraftable coronary territories for patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 633 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Nijveldt, P. A. van der Vleuten, A. Hirsch, A. M. Beek, R. A. Tio, J. G.P. Tijssen, J. J. Piek, A. C. van Rossum, and F. Zijlstra Early Electrocardiographic Findings and MR Imaging-Verified Microvascular Injury and Myocardial Infarct Size J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 1187 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Marsan, J. J.M. Westenberg, C. Ypenburg, R. J. van Bommel, S. Roes, V. Delgado, L. F. Tops, R. J. van der Geest, E. Boersma, A. de Roos, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony and scar tissue Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2009; 30(19): 2360 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.-J. Flu, J.-P. van Kuijk, J. J. Bax, J. Gorcsan III, and D. Poldermans Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a novel approach in the assessment of left ventricular volume and function? Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2009; 30(19): 2304 - 2307. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Leyva, P W X Foley, B Stegemann, J A Ward, L L Ng, M P Frenneaux, F Regoli, R E A Smith, and A Auricchio Development and validation of a clinical index to predict survival after cardiac resynchronisation therapy Heart, October 1, 2009; 95(19): 1619 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Blankstein, L. D. Shturman, I. S. Rogers, J. A. Rocha-Filho, D. R. Okada, A. Sarwar, A. V. Soni, H. Bezerra, B. B. Ghoshhajra, M. Petranovic, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2009; 54(12): 1072 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K-R Chiou, W-C Huang, N-J Peng, Y-L Huang, S-H Hsiao, K-H Chen, and M-T Wu Dual-phase multi-detector computed tomography assesses jeopardised and infarcted myocardium subtending infarct-related artery early after acute myocardial infarction Heart, September 15, 2009; 95(18): 1495 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Rodriguez-Granillo, M. A. Rosales, S. Baum, P. Rennes, C. Rodriguez-Pagani, V. Curotto, C. Fernandez-Pereira, C. Llaurado, G. Risau, E. Degrossi, et al. Early Assessment of Myocardial Viability by the Use of Delayed Enhancement Computed Tomography After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 1072 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Weidemann, S. Herrmann, S. Stork, M. Niemann, S. Frantz, V. Lange, M. Beer, S. Gattenlohner, W. Voelker, G. Ertl, et al. Impact of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Circulation, August 18, 2009; 120(7): 577 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Herzog, L. Husmann, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, P. T. Siegrist, F. M. Tay, N. Burkhard, C. A. Wyss, and P. A. Kaufmann Long-Term Prognostic Value of (13)N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion Positron Emission Tomography Added Value of Coronary Flow Reserve. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2009; 54(2): 150 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, J. Nunez, L. Mainar, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, J. V. Monmeneu, E. Rumiz, F. Chaustre, I. Trapero, O. Husser, et al. Prognostic Value of a Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment Soon After a First ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Andrade, L. H. W. Gowdak, M. C. P. Giorgi, F. J. de Paula, R. Kalil-Filho, J. J. G. de Lima, and C. E. Rochitte Cardiac MRI for Detection of Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: Comparison With ECG and Scintigraphy Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): W25 - W32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Abidov, R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, X. Kang, L. De Yang, L. Thomson, G. Germano, P. Slomka, et al. Are Shades of Gray Prognostically Useful in Reporting Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2009; 2(4): 290 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-C Lee, H-C Hsu, W-Y I Tseng, M-Y M Su, S-Y Chen, Y-W Wu, K-L Chien, and M-F Chen Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on angiogenic cytokines in postinfarction patients Heart, June 15, 2009; 95(12): 1012 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E.-Y. Choi, B. W. Choi, S.-A. Kim, S. J. Rhee, C. Y. Shim, Y. J. Kim, S.-M. Kang, J.-W. Ha, and N. Chung Patterns of late gadolinium enhancement are associated with ventricular stiffness in patients with advanced non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 573 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. M. van den Bosch, J. J. M. Westenberg, J. C. Post, G. Yo, J. Verwoerd, L. J. M. Kroft, and A. de Roos Free-Breathing MRI for the Assessment of Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Validation Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): W277 - W281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. van Ramshorst, J. J. Bax, S. L. M. A. Beeres, P. Dibbets-Schneider, S. D. Roes, M. P. M. Stokkel, A. de Roos, W. E. Fibbe, J. J. Zwaginga, E. Boersma, et al. Intramyocardial Bone Marrow Cell Injection for Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, May 20, 2009; 301(19): 1997 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Flynn, R. Curtin, E. R. Nowicki, J. Rajeswaran, S. D. Flamm, E. H. Blackstone, and T. Mihaljevic Regional wall motion abnormalities and scarring in severe functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: A pilot cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2009; 137(5): 1063 - 70.e2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. T. George, A. Arbab-Zadeh, J. M. Miller, K. Kitagawa, H.-J. Chang, D. A. Bluemke, L. Becker, O. Yousuf, J. Texter, A. C. Lardo, et al. Adenosine Stress 64- and 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion Imaging: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Transmural Extent of Perfusion Abnormalities to Predict Atherosclerosis Causing Myocardial Ischemia Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 174 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Friedrich, U. Sechtem, J. Schulz-Menger, G. Holmvang, P. Alakija, L. T. Cooper, J. A. White, H. Abdel-Aty, M. Gutberlet, S. Prasad, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1475 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Dalal, H. Tandri, D. P. Judge, N. Amat, R. Macedo, R. Jain, C. Tichnell, A. Daly, C. James, S. D. Russell, et al. Morphologic Variants of Familial Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy: A Genetics-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlation Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): 1289 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Spuentrup, K. M. Ruhl, R. M. Botnar, A. J. Wiethoff, A. Buhl, V. Jacques, M. T. Greenfield, G. A. Krombach, R. W. Gunther, M. G. Vangel, et al. Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion With EP-3600, a Collagen-Specific Contrast Agent: Initial Feasibility Study in a Swine Model Circulation, April 7, 2009; 119(13): 1768 - 1775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||