This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mehta, R. H. Articles by Eagle, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mehta, R. H. Articles by Eagle, K. A. Related Collections CT and MRI Echocardiography CV surgery: aortic and vascular disease

(Circulation. 2002;105:200.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Predicting Death in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Rajendra H. Mehta, MD MS; Toru Suzuki, MD; Peter G. Hagan, MD; Eduardo Bossone, MD; Dan Gilon, MD; Alfredo Llovet, MD; Luis C. Maroto, MD; Jeanna V. Cooper, MS; Dean E. Smith, PhD; William F. Armstrong, MD; Christoph A. Nienaber, MD; Kim A. Eagle, MD, on Behalf of the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators

From the University of Michigan (R.H.M., P.G.H., J.V.C., D.E., W.F.A., K.A.E.), Ann Arbor; University of Tokyo (T.S.), Japan; Instituto Policlinico San Donato (E.B.), Milan, Italy; Hadassah University Hospital (D.G.), Jerusalem, Israel; Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre" (A.L., L.C.M.), Madrid, Spain; and University of Rostock (C.A.N.), Germany.

Correspondence to Kim A. Eagle, MD, University of Michigan, 3910 TC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail keagle{at}umich.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background— Given the high mortality rates in patients with type A aortic dissection, predictive tools to identify patients at increased risk of death are needed to assist clinicians for optimal treatment.

Methods and Results— Accordingly, we evaluated 547 patients with this diagnosis enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between January 1996 and December 1999. Univariate testing followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of death. In-hospital mortality rate was 32.5% in type A dissection patients. In-hospital complications (neurological deficits, altered mental status, myocardial or mesenteric ischemia, kidney failure, hypotension, cardiac tamponade, and limb ischemia) were increased in patients who died compared with survivors (P<0.05 for all). Logistic regression identified the following presenting variables as predictors of death: age 70 years (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.77; P=0.03), abrupt onset of chest pain (OR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.22 to 5.54; P=0.01), hypotension/shock/tamponade (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.83 to 4.81; P<0.0001), kidney failure (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.80 to 12.6; P=0.002), pulse deficit (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.29, P=0.004), and abnormal ECG (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.95; P=0.03) (area under receiver operating curve, 0.74; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, P=0.75).

Conclusions— The in-hospital mortality rate in acute type A aortic dissection is high and can be predicted with the use of a clinical model incorporated in a simple risk prediction tool. This tool can be used to educate patients with dissection about their predicted risk and in clinical research for risk adjustment while comparing outcomes of different therapies.

Key Words: aorta • mortality • surgery • risk factors

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Acute type A aortic dissection is a medical emergency that carries a high mortality rate in absence of surgical treatment.^1–9 Most studies that have evaluated the predictors of death for patients with aortic dissection were restricted to a small number of patients at a single center stretching over a period of years.^5,10–18 Furthermore, these studies have focused their attention on the surgically treated cohort rather than all patients with dissection presenting to their institution.^{10–17,19–21} Most have not distinguished acute from chronic stable,^{5,10–12,14,17,19,21} or type A from B^{11,14,17,19,21} dissection, conditions that have different natural histories and call for different treatment strategies. As such, at present, the predictors of death in large, unselected, consecutive acute type A aortic dissection patients are not well known.

The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) represents an opportunity to study a large group of consecutive patients with aortic dissection who presented to hospitals in a broad geographic region.⁷ We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 290 clinical variables and their relation to in-hospital death to identify independent predictors of death. Furthermore, with the use of these identifiers, the goal of this analysis was to create a simple bedside tool that could be used to predict death.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection
The inception and structure of IRAD has been described previously.⁷ In brief, 18 large referral centers in 6 countries agreed to participate in the ongoing registry, which was established in 1996. The main purpose of IRAD was to assess the etiological factors, modes of presentation, clinical features, treatment, and outcome of patients with aortic dissection in the current era. Beginning January 1, 1996, consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection (both type A and type B) presenting to IRAD sites were enrolled in the registry. Consecutive patients were identified prospectively at presentation or retrospectively by searching hospital discharge diagnosis records and/or surgical, pathology, and echocardiography databases. Diagnosis was suspected on the basis of the history and physical examination and was confirmed by imaging study findings, visualization at surgery, and/or postmortem examination.

Patient Selection
All patients with acute type A aortic dissection enrolled in IRAD from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 1999, were included for the purpose of this analysis. Acute type A dissection was defined as any dissection that involved the ascending aorta with presentation within 14 days of symptom onset.^13,22

Data Collection
Data were assembled with the use of a standardized data form on patient demographics, history, clinical presentations, physical findings, imaging studies results, details of medical and surgical treatment, and patient outcomes. Completed data entry forms were forwarded by the participating IRAD sites to the coordinating center at the University of Michigan. Data forms were reviewed for analytical internal validity, and external validation was performed through a random (5%) field selection and error audit. Data were scanned electronically into an Access database.

Clinical Events
Chart review was used to document in-hospital clinical events and in-hospital death. Standard American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association definitions were used to denote various in-hospital complications.²³ Abrupt-onset pain was defined as documentation in patients’ charts of sudden severe tearing pain in the chest, neck, or back, with maximum intensity at onset and that brought the patient to medical attention. An ECG was noted as abnormal if it showed pathologic Q waves, ST-segment deviation, T-wave inversions, left bundle-branch block, or left ventricular hypertrophy.

Statistical Analysis
Summary statistics are presented as frequencies and percentages, mean±SD, or as median and interquartile ranges. In all cases, missing data were not defaulted to negative, and denominators reflect only cases reported. Associations of death among nominal variables were compared by means of ² tests and 2-sided Fisher exact tests. Continuous univariate predictors for death were tested by means of t tests or Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate.

Predictive Modeling
Iterative logistic regression modeling for in-hospital death with the likelihood ratio test used for model selection was performed. Initial modeling used elements marginally suggestive of an unadjusted association to in-hospital death (defined as P<0.20). Variables were reviewed for clinical significance before testing. Diagnostic routines (Hosmer-Lemeshow test for lack of fit, change in deviance, and likelihood ratio test) were used on final model selection. SAS 8.1 was used for all analyses.

Development of a Simple Bedside Risk Prediction Tool
The variables found to be significantly associated with in-hospital death in the "best" regression model were assigned a score equal to their coefficients in the fitted model (natural log of their odds ratios rounded to the nearest decimal) (Appendix). The sum of this numerical score in an individual patient could then be used to predict his or her in-hospital death. A risk prediction tool that plotted the various score levels against the corresponding predicted death was developed to aid clinicians in predicting in-hospital death for patients with type A aortic dissection.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Overall Characteristics of IRAD Patients
Of the total of 874 patients with aortic dissection (both type A and B) in IRAD, 547 patients had type A aortic dissection (62.5%) (Tables 1 through 3). Their mean age was 61.9±14.1 years, with a majority being men (65.5%). Two thirds of patients presented initially to an outside hospital and were transferred to an IRAD center for further treatment. Nearly 79.7% of patients underwent surgery for repair of aortic dissection. The reason for medical treatment was not specified in 5% of patients by their caring physician, whereas the remaining patients were treated medically for comorbid conditions (55%), old age (17%, all but one patient >70 years of age; mean age, 79.9±5.8 years), refusal by the patient (14%), having only intramural hematoma (7%), and extensive dissection involving the descending aorta (17%). In-hospital death occurred in one third of patients (32.5%) and was 26.9% in surgically treated patients versus 56.2% in those treated medically without surgery. The cause of death was not specified in 33.3% of these patients, whereas rupture accounted for a third of death (33.3%), followed by neurological deficit (13.9%), visceral ischemia/kidney failure (11.5%) and cardiac tamponade (7.9%) in the remaining.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Demographics and History for Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Clinical Presentations, Signs, and Diagnostic Imaging Results of All Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. In-Hospital Treatments and Complications in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection

Univariate Predictors of In-Hospital Death for All Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection
Clinical characteristics that showed significant association included advanced age, female sex, abrupt onset and migratory chest pain, hypotension/shock/tamponade on presentation, and evidence of neurological or pulse deficits at presentation (Tables 1 through 3). Furthermore, the presence of a widened mediastinum on chest radiography, electrocardiographic evidence of new Q waves and/or ST-segment deviations, or a lack of a normal ECG were associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates. As expected, complications such as neurological deficit, myocardial ischemia, hypotension, kidney failure, and limb ischemia were also more frequent in patients who died than in those who survived. On the other hand, a medical history of hypertension, diabetes, aneurysm, or heart surgery was similar in the two groups of patients.

Predictive Model for In-Hospital Death
Independent predictors of in-hospital death are as shown in Table 4. The area under the receiver operating curve for the model was 0.74, suggesting good model discrimination. The deviance probability value was 0.12, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was not significant, indicating little departure from a perfect fit (²=4.3; df=7; P=0.75). Figure 1 plots expected deaths versus observed deaths over the risk categories.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 4. Prediction Models

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Observed vs predicted death for acute type A aortic dissection.

Variables Score and the Bedside Risk Prediction Tool
The risk variables and their allocated scores are listed in Table 4. Kidney failure was given the highest score (1.6), whereas sex was given the lowest score (0.3), with other variable scores being in between these values [hypotension/shock/tamponade (1.1), abrupt onset of pain (1.0), age 70 (0.5), and abnormal ECG on presentation (0.6)]. There was a good agreement between observed and predicted death over score categories (Figure 2.). The simple bedside risk prediction tool is shown in the Appendix and in Table 4.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Observed vs predicted death for acute type A aortic dissection based on risk score. Note that as the score increases, the predicted and observed mortality rates increased.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
High In-Hospital Mortality Rates in Patients With Type A Acute Aortic Dissection
The present study shows that in-hospital mortality rates in patients with type A acute aortic dissection remain high, with nearly 1 of 3 patients dying, even in centers that have extensive expertise and interest in the treatment of these high-risk patients. Furthermore, it identifies rupture of the dissecting aorta to be the cause of death in roughly one third of these patients. This high mortality rate in an era of advanced surgical techniques and increasing expertise of anesthesiologists, cardiologists, and cardiac and vascular surgeons in treating this disorder may be a result of inclusion in this study of all patients seen at these sites rather than patients selected to undergo surgery. The inclusion of patients who were too ill for surgery or died before they received surgical repair may explain part of the increased mortality rate. Also, the mean age of the patients in the present study was higher than that in any of the prior investigations, and because age is an important predictor of adverse outcomes, this may also have contributed to higher mortality rate in our study.

Clinical Variables Associated With High In-Hospital Mortality Rates and Their Implications
Our study identified several clinical variables to be important predictors of death in patients with acute type A dissection (Table 3) that are similar to those reported in prior studies (Table 4). ^{5,11–14,16,17,24} The similarities of variables predicting in-hospital death in these prior reports and our study support the clinical relevancy of the current predictive model. That older age is associated with worse outcomes is not surprising and is consistent with prior reports.^11,13,14 Abrupt onset of chest, neck, or back pain may be a manifestation of more sudden, severe, and extensive tearing and thus may have independently predicted greater risk of death in our study.

A common theme in prior publications as well as in our study is that rupture and complications such as hypotension, shock, cardiac tamponade, pulse deficits, and kidney failure confer an even higher mortality rate. These findings may have obvious therapeutic implications, which in turn may result in a significant effect on the overall patient survival. Aggressive surgical correction of the dissecting aneurysm may not only help prevent rupture but also is the only option that will provide a reasonable chance of survival to these individuals with otherwise dismal outcome. Many complications in patients with acute aortic type A dissection may be similarly prevented by earlier and more aggressive surgical treatment. If complications have already developed, attempts should be made to try and minimize their deleterious effect by establishing effective visceral (renal, cerebral, mesenteric) blood flow and relieving organ ischemia in a timely fashion either through surgery or by percutaneous techniques such as fenestration and/or endoluminal stents followed by definitive surgical repair. This latter approach is less invasive and can quickly restore vital organ perfusion so that the patient with malperfusion can be stabilized and then go on to have a successful repair. Preliminary results of this approach at our institution as well as other sites have been encouraging.^25–28

Risk Prediction Bedside Tool for Predicting Death
The present study incorporated variables at presentation that were independently associated with death into a simple risk prediction tool that is relatively accurate in predicting risk of death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (Table 4). The model risk prediction estimates should help clinicians while making recommendations about different treatment options for individual patients with type A dissection. Like risk prediction tools for other cardiovascular diseases, this tool should be used by physicians for counseling patients and their families in helping them to understand their predicted risk and to have realistic expectations in terms of outcomes, especially in those deemed to be at high risk for in-hospital death. Model predictions should not necessarily be used to deny aggressive treatment in such patients who otherwise have a dismal prognosis. Finally, the prediction tool should be helpful in evaluating effects of new approaches and diagnostic methods as IRAD goes forward.

Uniqueness of the Present Study
Important differences between our study and prior investigations need to be highlighted. Most prior studies included a small number of patients from a single center with type A and B acute or chronic aortic dissection, whereas our analysis was performed on a large number of patients with only acute type A dissection presenting to 18 different IRAD sites. Furthermore, unselected consecutive patients with type A aortic dissection, irrespective of treatment strategies (surgical or medical), were analyzed in contrast to most prior investigations, which evaluated only the surgical cohort (Table 5). Thus, the findings of our study can be generalized to patients with acute type A dissection having a broad spectrum of clinical presentation across diverse medical institutions. Finally, this study provides an important risk prediction tool that allows accurate estimation of a patient’s in-hospital risk of death at the bedside through the use of readily available clinical information at presentation. This tool could also be valuable in outcome research to estimate risk-adjusted outcomes while comparing different subgroups of patients with type A dissection.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 5. Studies Predicting Death in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection

Limitations of Our Study
The results of our study should not be generalized to patients with chronic stable type A dissection or to patients who are selected to undergo surgery. We measured only one easily and reliably measurable outcome domain, in-hospital death, which, although important to patients, is not sufficient for the full evaluation of patients with type A aortic dissection. Our focus on death as the only outcome should not diminish the importance of other outcome variables such as nonfatal adverse events, patient functional status, patient satisfaction, and resource use. Future studies are needed to address the best approach for evaluating the predictors of these other domains.

Conclusions
Our study supports prior observations that acute type A dissection is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates despite recent advances in treatment. This study further indicates that multiple factors affect in-hospital death and help to identify these predictors. In addition, it provides a useful, simple, bedside risk prediction tool that could be used by physicians not only for determining the prognosis of patients and counseling them and their families regarding their risks but also as a research tool to better understand the impact of newer diagnostic and therapeutic technological advances in the treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Appendix
Score=Age · 0.5331 + Sex · 0.3244 + Abrupt Onset Chest Pain at Presentation · 0.9569 + Pulse Deficit at Presentation · 0.7089 + Abnormal ECG at Presentation · 0.5714 · Renal Failure at Presentation or Before Surgery · 1.5616 + Hypotension/Shock/Tamponade at Presentation · 1.0876, with Age an indicator for Age 70; Sex an indicator with female=1, male=0; and the other variables being indicators for respective conditions. Note logit (probability of in-hospital death)=Score + (-2.94), where -2.94 is the intercept.

Received August 8, 2001; revision received November 2, 2001; accepted November 5, 2001.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Hirst A, Johns VJ, Krime SJ. Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta: a review of 505 cases. Medicine. 1958; 37: 217–279.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
2. Kouchoukos NT, Dougenis D. Surgery of thoracic aorta. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 1876–1888.[Free Full Text]
   
3. Khanderia BK. Aortic dissection: the last frontier. Circulation. 1993; 87: 1765–1768.Editorial.[Free Full Text]
   
4. Eagle KA, DeSanctis RW. Aortic dissection. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1989; 14: 225–278.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
5. Goosens D, Schepens M, Hamerlijnck R, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in type A aortic dissections: a retrospective analysis of 148 consecutive surgical patients. Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 6: 76–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
6. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Petersen B, et al. Intramural hemorrhage of thoracic aorta: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1465–1472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
7. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000; 283: 897–903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Lui RC, Menkis AH, McKenzie FN. Aortic dissection without intimal rupture: diagnosis and management. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992; 53: 886–888.[Abstract]
   
9. Perko MJ, Norgaard M, Herzog TM, et al. Unoperated aortic aneurysms: a survey of 170 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 59: 1204–1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
10. Jamieson WR, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, et al. Aortic dissection: early diagnosis and surgical management are keys to survival. Can J Surg. 1982; 25: 145–149.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
11. Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, et al. Dissection of the aorta and dissecting aortic aneurysms: improving early and long-term surgical results. Circulation. 1990; 82 (suppl IV): IV-24–IV-38.
    
12. Bigioli P, Parolari A, Spirito R, et al. Early and late results of ascending aorta surgery: risk factors for early and late outcome. World J Surg. 1997; 21: 590–598.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
13. Ehrlich M, Fang WC, Grabenwoger M, et al. Perioperative risk factors for mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Circulation. 1998; 98 (suppl II): II-294–II-298.
    
14. Fann JI, Smith JA, Miller DC, et al. Surgical management of aortic dissection during a 30-year period. Circulation. 1995; 92 (suppl II): II-113–II-121.
    
15. Mazzucotelli JP, Deleuze PH, Baufreton C, et al. Preservation of the aortic valve in acute aortic dissection: long-term echocardiographic assessment and clinical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 55: 1513–1517.[Abstract]
    
16. Pansini S, Gagliardotto PV, Pompei E, et al. Early and late risk factors in surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 779–784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
17. Chirillo F, Marchiori L, Andriolo L, et al. Outcome of 290 patients with aortic dissection, a 12 year multicenter experience. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11: 311–319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
18. Scholl FG, Coady MA, Davies R, et al. Interval or permanent non-operative management of acute type A aortic dissection. Arch Surg. 1999; 134: 402–406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
19. Haverich A, Miller DC, Scott WC, et al. Acute and chronic aortic dissections: determinants of long-term outcome for operative survivors. Circulation. 1985; 72 (suppl II): II-22–II-34.
    
20. Niederhauser U, Kunzli A, Seifert B, et al. Conservative treatment of the aortic root in acute type A dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 15: 571–578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
21. Safi HJ, Miller CC, Reardon MJ, et al. Operation for acute and chronic aortic dissection: recent outcome with regard to neurologic deficit and early death. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 402–411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
22. Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, et al. Management of acute dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 1970; 10: 237–247.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
23. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 1999; 100: 1464–1480.[Free Full Text]
    
24. Lytle BW, Mahfood SS, Cosgrove DM, et al. Replacement of the ascending aorta: early and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990; 99: 651–658.[Abstract]
    
25. Deeb GM, Williams DM, Bolling SF, et al. Surgical delay for acute type A dissection with malperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 64: 1669–1677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Chavan A, Hausmann D, Dresler C, et al. Intravascular ultra-sound guided percutaneous fenestration of the intimal flap in the dissected aorta. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2124–2127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
27. Walker PJ, Dake MD, Mitchell RS, et al. The use of endovascular stent techniques for the treatment of complications of aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 1993; 18: 1042–1051.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
28. Slonim SM, Nyman U, Semba CP, et al. Aortic dissection: percutaneous management of ischemic complications with endovascular stents and balloon fenestration. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 23: 241–253.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. J. Patel and G. M. Deeb Ascending and Arch Aorta: Pathology, Natural History, and Treatment Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 188 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hata, A. Sezai, T. Niino, M. Yoda, S. Unosawa, N. Furukawa, S. Osaka, T. Murakami, and K. Minami Should emergency surgical intervention be performed for an octogenarian with type A acute aortic dissection? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1042 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sodeck, H. Domanovits, M. Schillinger, K. Janata, M. Thalmann, M. P. Ehrlich, G. Endler, and A. Laggner Pre-operative N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts outcome in type A aortic dissection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1092 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Swee and M. D. Dake Endovascular Management of Thoracic Dissections Circulation, March 18, 2008; 117(11): 1460 - 1473. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Neuhauser, A. Greiner, W. Jaschke, A. Chemelli, and G. Fraedrich Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type B dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Di Luozzo, H. J. Tannous, S. H. Ellozy, S. Nowakowski, K. A. Plestis, D. H. Adams, and R. B. Griepp Delayed Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in a Patient with Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Pulse Deficit Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 2097 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Watanuki, H. Ogino, K. Minatoya, H. Matsuda, H. Sasaki, M. Ando, and S. Kitamura Is Emergency Total Arch Replacement With a Modified Elephant Trunk Technique Justified for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1585 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zierer, R. K. Voeller, K. E. Hill, N. T. Kouchoukos, R. J. Damiano Jr, and M. R. Moon Aortic Enlargement and Late Reoperation After Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 84(2): 479 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Geirsson, W. Y. Szeto, A. Pochettino, M. L. McGarvey, M. G. Keane, Y. J. Woo, J. G. Augoustides, and J. E. Bavaria Significance of malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 255 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Santini and A. Mazzucco How should I cannulate my next acute aortic dissection? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 545 - 547. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Olsson, N. Eriksson, E. Stahle, and S. Thelin Surgical and long-term mortality in 2634 consecutive patients operated on the proximal thoracic aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 963 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shiono, M. Hata, A. Sezai, T. Niino, S. Yagi, and N. Negishi Validity of a Limited Ascending and Hemiarch Replacement for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1665 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shiono, M. Hata, A. Sezai, M. Iida, S. Yagi, and N. Negishi Emergency Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Octogenarians Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 554 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Tsai, A. Evangelista, C. A. Nienaber, S. Trimarchi, U. Sechtem, R. Fattori, T. Myrmel, L. Pape, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, et al. Long-Term Survival in Patients Presenting With Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-350 - I-356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Weber, M Rammer, J Auer, E Maurer, G Aspock, and B Eber Plasma concentrations of D-dimer predict mortality in acute type A aortic dissection. Heart, June 1, 2006; 92(6): 836 - 837. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Santini, G. Montalbano, A. Messina, A. D'Onofrio, G. Casali, F. Viscardi, G. B. Luciani, and A. Mazzucco Survival and quality of life after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older justify intervention Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 29(3): 386 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Tsai, C. A. Nienaber, and K. A. Eagle Acute Aortic Syndromes Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3802 - 3813. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kallenbach, M. Karck, D. Pak, R. Salcher, N. Khaladj, R. Leyh, C. Hagl, and A. Haverich Decade of Aortic Valve Sparing Reimplantation: Are We Pushing the Limits Too Far? Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-253 - I-259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Nienaber, V. Skriabina, W. Schareck, and H. Ince To stent or not to stent aortic dissection: good news for a chosen few, but who? Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2005; 26(5): 431 - 432. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Estrera, Z. Garami, C. C. Miller III, R. Sheinbaum, T. T.T. Huynh, E. E. Porat, B. S. Allen, and H. J. Safi Cerebral monitoring with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography improves neurologic outcome during repairs of acute type A aortic dissection J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 277 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Trimarchi, C. A. Nienaber, V. Rampoldi, T. Myrmel, T. Suzuki, R. H. Mehta, E. Bossone, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, L. Menicanti, et al. Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 112 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A Beckman, R. H Mehta, E. M Isselbacher, E. Bossone, J. V Cooper, D. E Smith, J. Fang, U. Sechtem, L. A Pape, T. Myrmel, et al. Branch vessel complications are increased in aortic dissection patients with renal insufficiency Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2004; 9(4): 267 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Collins, A. Evangelista, C. A. Nienaber, E. Bossone, J. Fang, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, P. T. O'Gara, T. Myrmel, D. Gilon, et al. Differences in Clinical Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With and Without Previous Cardiac Surgery Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-237 - II-242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kallenbach, T. Oelze, R. Salcher, C. Hagl, M. Karck, R. G. Leyh, and A. Haverich Evolving Strategies for Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-243 - II-249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Kasher, A. El-Bialy, and P. Balingit Aortic Dissection: A Dreaded Disease with Many Faces Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. Nienaber, R. Fattori, R. H. Mehta, B. M. Richartz, A. Evangelista, M. Petzsch, J. V. Cooper, J. L. Januzzi, H. Ince, U. Sechtem, et al. Gender-Related Differences in Acute Aortic Dissection Circulation, June 22, 2004; 109(24): 3014 - 3021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Creager, D. W. Jones, J. D. Easton, J. L. Halperin, A. T. Hirsch, A. H. Matsumoto, P. T. O'Gara, R. D. Safian, G. L. Schwartz, and J. A. Spittell Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group V: Medical Decision Making and Therapy Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2634 - 2642. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Mehta, E. Bossone, A. Evangelista, P. T. O'Gara, D. E. Smith, J. V. Cooper, J. K. Oh, J. L. Januzzi, S. Hutchison, D. Gilon, et al. Acute type B aortic dissection in elderly patients: clinical features, outcomes, and simple risk stratification rule Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1622 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Vernhet, J. M. Serfaty, M. Serhal, E. McFadden, E. Bonnefoy, P. Adeleine, D. Revel, and P. Douek Abdominal CT Angiography Before Surgery as a Predictor of Postoperative Death in Acute Aortic Dissection Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 875 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]