| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2002;105:2259.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (C.S.R., P.B.B., H.H.T., P.J.B., M.S., M.R.B., G.W.B., V.M., K.N.G., D.R.H.), Division of Hypertension and Internal Medicine (S.C.T.), and the Section of Biostatistics (D.E.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Reprint requests to Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results With a retrospective analysis of the Mayo Clinic PCI registry, we determined the incidence of, risk factors for, and prognostic implications of ARF (defined as an increase in serum creatinine [Cr] >0.5 mg/dL from baseline) after PCI. Of 7586 patients, 254 (3.3%) experienced ARF. Among patients with baseline Cr <2.0, the risk of ARF was higher among diabetic than nondiabetic patients, whereas among those with a baseline Cr >2.0, all had a significant risk of ARF. In multivariate analysis, ARF was associated with baseline serum Cr, acute myocardial infarction, shock, and volume of contrast medium administered. Twenty-two percent of patients with ARF died during the index hospitalization compared with only 1.4% of patients without ARF (P<0.0001). After adjustment, ARF remained strongly associated with death. Among hospital survivors with ARF, 1- and 5-year estimated mortality rates were 12.1% and 44.6%, respectively, much greater than the 3.7% and 14.5% mortality rates in patients without ARF (P<0.0001).
Conclusions The overall incidence of ARF after PCI is low. Diabetic patients with baseline Cr values <2.0 mg/dL are at higher risk than nondiabetic patients, whereas all patients with a serum Cr >2.0 are at high risk for ARF. ARF was highly correlated with death during the index hospitalization and after dismissal.
Key Words: coronary disease kidney acute renal failure angioplasty stents
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects and Technique
We identified all patients who had coronary interventional procedures from January 1996 through May 2000. No subgroups of patients (for example, those with acute myocardial infarction or shock) were excluded. Only patients who denied research access to their medical records were excluded (n=153), as required by Minnesota law.
In most cases, the femoral approach was used, although arm approaches were used as necessary. Procedures performed included balloon angioplasty, stent deployment, and rotational, directional, and extractional atherectomy. An excimer laser was used in a small number of patients. A single nonionic contrast agent, iopamidol (Isovue, Bracco Diagnostics), has been used almost exclusively (>99% of procedures) in our laboratory over the past 5 years. Patients with preexisting chronic renal insufficiency were admitted for intravenous hydration at the discretion of their physicians.
Definitions
ARF was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (Cr) concentration of
0.5 mg/dL from preprocedure values. Postprocedure Cr values were measured within 48 hours or before dismissal. Successful lesion dilatation after PCI was defined as achievement of <50% residual diameter stenosis, including at least a 20% improvement, by visual estimate. Procedural success was defined as successful treatment of
1 lesion without in-hospital death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or emergency bypass surgery. Myocardial infarction was considered to have occurred if 2 of the following 3 criteria were met: chest pain of
20 minutes duration, enzyme elevation
2 times normal, and development of ST-T-wave changes or new Q waves on electrocardiography.
Statistical Methods
Results are presented as mean±SD or a percentage of the total. Continuous data were compared by means of Students t test; proportions were compared with Pearsons
2 test. A number of patients had >1 procedure during the study period. In such cases, only the first procedure was included. In 186 patients, the preprocedure Cr value was missing, but they had normal postprocedure values; in 455 patients, baseline Cr was normal, but the postprocedure value was missing. In these cases, missing values were imputed from the median of the normal Cr values from the remainder of the patients (median 1.1 mg/dL for both preprocedure and postprocedure Cr values). A total of 223 patients (2.9%) were excluded either because of 2 missing values or because of 1 missing value with 1 abnormal value. In this manner, a final sample size of 7586 (97.1%) of 7809 patients undergoing PCI during this time period were identified for this analysis.
Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify correlates of ARF and in-hospital mortality after PCI. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Models were developed with stepwise techniques and by consideration of variables that were clinically relevant. Variables included are total volume of contrast medium, age, sex, body mass index, Canadian Heart Association class, history of congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, metastatic cancer, preprocedure shock, tumor, peptic ulcer disease, peripheral vascular disease, and myocardial infarction in the 24 hours before the procedure. Long-term follow-up of patients surviving the hospital phase is presented based on the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Survival curves based on the occurrence of ARF were adjusted for other significant predictors of late survival.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Incidence of ARF Stratified by Baseline Cr and Diabetic Status
The observed incidence of ARF after PCI was related to the baseline serum Cr concentration and the presence of diabetes (Table 2). Among patients with a baseline serum Cr <2.0 mg/dL, diabetic patients had a significantly higher risk of ARF than nondiabetic patients (risk 3.7% versus 2.0% for Cr <1.1, P=0.05 and 4.5% versus 1.9% for Cr 1.2 to 1.9, P<0.001). When baseline Cr was >2.0 mg/dL, however, a high proportion of both diabetic and nondiabetic patients experienced ARF (risk 22.4% for Cr 2.0 to 2.9 mg/dL and 30.6% for Cr
3.0 mg/dL).
|
Multivariate Analysis
Variables independently associated with ARF after PCI are shown in Table 3. ARF was most strongly associated with increased baseline serum Cr and acute myocardial infarction in the 24-hour interval before the index PCI (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.63, P=0.0006). Patients who had a successful PCI procedure were much less likely to experience ARF (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.38, P<0.0001), as were patients who underwent PCI of the right coronary artery. Other significant correlates included age, a history of congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and the presence of peripheral vascular disease. Volume of contrast medium administered at the time of PCI was weakly correlated with ARF (OR 1.12 for each 100-mL increase, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.23, P=0.02).
|
Procedural Complications by Change in Serum Cr
As shown in Table 4, patients who experienced ARF had a much higher incidence of coronary artery, peripheral vascular, and systemic complications after PCI. The overall procedural success rate was markedly diminished among patients with ARF (72.8% versus 94.0%, P<0.0001), and the risk of Q-wave myocardial infarction was significantly higher in ARF patients (3.9% versus 0.9%, P<0.0001). Twenty-two percent (56) of 254 patients who experienced ARF died in the hospital, compared with 1.4% of patients without ARF (P<0.0001). The vast majority of deaths in both groups were of cardiac causes (Table 5). A greater proportion of ARF patients who died in the hospital had recent myocardial infarction, shock, and 3-vessel coronary artery disease (Table 6).
|
|
|
Patients who experienced ARF had higher rates of femoral access-site bleeding, hematoma formation, and pseudoaneurysms. Other noncardiac complications, such as stroke, coma, adult respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolus, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, were also significantly more frequent among patients who experienced ARF. A larger proportion of patients who died underwent emergent or urgent procedures (89% versus 67%, P=0.001), whereas a smaller proportion were taking ß-blockers (55% versus 64%, P=0.23; Table 6). Among 254 patients who experienced ARF, 6 (10.7%) of 56 patients who died required hemodialysis compared with 14 (7.1%) of 198 survivors (P=0.39). To ascertain whether ARF was independently associated with in-hospital death, we constructed a multivariate logistic model (Table 7). Preprocedural shock (OR 12.12, 95% CI 8.11 to 18.13, P
0.0001) and ARF (OR 10.83, 95% CI 6.91 to 16.98, P
0.0001) were by far the strongest predictors of in-hospital death in multivariate analysis. After adjustment for ARF, baseline serum Cr was not significantly associated with in-hospital death.
|
Long-Term Prognostic Implications of ARF After PCI
The Figure illustrates long-term survival data for patients who survived to hospital dismissal. Among the 6890 patients who did not experience ARF, the Kaplan-Meier estimated risk of death at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 2.3%, 3.7%, and 14.5%, respectively. In contrast, the 185 hospital survivors who experienced ARF had a much higher risk of dying during follow-up, with Kaplan-Meier estimated mortality rates of 9.8%, 12.1%, and 44.6% at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively (P<0.0001). Rates of myocardial infarction, both Q wave and non-Q wave, were also significantly higher among patients who had experienced ARF during the index hospitalization. Myocardial infarction rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were 4.3%, 7.0%, and 18.5%, respectively, among ARF patients compared with 2.7%, 3.8%, and 10.5% for patients without ARF (P=0.003).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparison With Previous Work
Although much smaller than the present study, a recently published report emphasized the adverse prognostic importance of ARF after PCI in patients with baseline Cr elevation.12 A remarkable 46% of 161 patients who had an increase in serum Cr of
25% died by 1 year compared with 19.4% of those who did not. Independent correlates of mortality included Cr elevation, age, and PCI of a saphenous vein graft lesion. Our data are consistent with previous outcome studies documenting high rates of cardiac death and myocardial infarction among patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.13 Cardiac causes are by far the major causes of mortality among such patients. In addition, patients with chronic renal failure who undergo PCI have relatively poor outcomes, as do those who have CABG surgery.2
Mechanisms of ARF could not be established by the present study design, but these likely include the administration of iodinated contrast imaging agents. The pathobiology of contrast-induced renal insufficiency is complex and may be related to adenosine metabolism, perturbations of glomerular flow, endothelin and prostaglandin metabolism, and oxidative stress.810,1418 The incidence of ARF reported in previously published studies has varied widely among patients with normal renal function at baseline, diabetes mellitus, and chronic renal insufficiency but in general was lower than in the present study.311 Most of these studies were performed among stable patients who had diagnostic imaging procedures, whereas the present study addressed the incidence of ARF among patients who required high dye loads, including those who were critically ill or in shock.
Our data cannot establish whether the development of ARF is a marker of multisystem failure in critically ill patients or directly contributes to mortality, or both. The observed associations of ARF with recent myocardial infarction, shock, and a history of congestive heart failure suggest that hemodynamic deterioration plays a central role in the pathogenesis of ARF and in the prognosis of patients in whom the condition develops. To favorably influence prognosis, therefore, therapeutic maneuvers that are directed both at achieving hemodynamic stability and at preventing multiorgan failure are likely needed.
Study Limitations
Although no patient subsets were excluded and a 4-year consecutive series was analyzed, ours is a post hoc analysis of an existing database. Because postprocedure serum Cr checks were ordered only when clinically indicated, it is possible that some patients were missed who had ARF but did not manifest an increase in Cr concentration until day 2 or 3 after the procedure, although this is unusual.19 Such misclassification, if important, would decrease the power to detect a difference between groups. The fact that clinical outcomes were so disparately different between groups suggests that any such misclassification was minor. The type of ARF (ischemic, nephrotoxic, or atheroembolic) could not be determined precisely. Renal biopsies were not performed. Because of the nature of the patients and the procedures being performed, ARF was assumed to be multifactorial.
Because of methodological limitations inherent in retrospective registry analyses, our data cannot definitely establish an etiologic link between worsening renal function after PCI and the observed increased risk of death and myocardial infarction. Our data cannot address whether prevention of such seemingly modest increases in Cr concentration can influence outcome after PCI. Only a prospective randomized study with large numbers of patients that demonstrates an effective reduction in the risk of renal failure, along with reduction in long-term risk of death, can answer that question.
Conclusions
We conclude that although the overall incidence of ARF after PCI is low, (1) patients with baseline elevation of serum Cr concentration are at high risk of ARF after PCI, (2) patients who experience ARF after PCI are at very high risk of in-hospital death, and (3) patients with worsening renal function are at very high risk of death or myocardial infarction in follow-up.
Received August 14, 2001; revision received March 6, 2002; accepted March 6, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ting HH, Tahirkheli NK, Berger PB, et al. Evaluation of long-term survival after successful percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 630633,A9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barrett BJ, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both: a prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 143149.[Abstract]
4.
Rich MW, Crecelius CA. Incidence, risk factors, and clinical course of acute renal insufficiency after cardiac catheterization in patients 70 years of age or older: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150: 12371242.
5. Schwab SJ, Hlatky MA, Pieper KS, et al. Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 149153.[Abstract]
6. Rudnick MR, Goldfarb S, Wexler L, et al. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial: the Iohexol Cooperative Study. Kidney Int. 1995; 47: 254261.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Weisberg LS, Kurnik PB, Kurnik BR. Risk of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int. 1994; 45: 259265.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Baliga R, Ueda N, Walker PD, et al. Oxidant mechanisms in toxic acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 29: 465477.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Bakris GL, Lass N, Gaber AO, et al. Radiocontrast medium-induced declines in renal function: a role for oxygen free radicals. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258: F115F120.
10. Yoshioka T, Fogo A, Beckman JK. Reduced activity of antioxidant enzymes underlies contrast media-induced renal injury in volume depletion. Kidney Int. 1992; 41: 10081015.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Brady HR, Singer GG. Acute renal failure. Lancet. 1995; 346: 15331540.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 15421548.
13. Cheung AK, Sarnak MJ, Yan G, et al. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2000; 58: 353362.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Parvez Z, Rahman MA, Moncada R. Contrast media-induced lipid peroxidation in the rat kidney. Invest Radiol. 1989; 24: 697702.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Pflueger A, Larson TS, Nath KA, et al. Role of adenosine in contrast media-induced acute renal failure in diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000; 75: 12751283.[Abstract]
16. Gross P, Bussemaker E. Endothelin: what role in acute contrast nephropathy? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996; 11: 17161718.
17. Clark BA, Kim D, Epstein FH. Endothelin and atrial natriuretic peptide levels following radiocontrast exposure in humans. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30: 8286.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Heyman SN, Clark BA, Kaiser N, et al. Radiocontrast agents induce endothelin release in vivo and in vitro. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992; 3: 5865.[Abstract]
19. Rudnick MR, Berns JS, Cohen RM, et al. Nephrotoxic risks of renal angiography: contrast media-associated nephrotoxicity and atheroembolism: a critical review. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994; 24: 713727.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Kiski, W. Stepper, E. Brand, G. Breithardt, and H. Reinecke Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or AT-1 blockers on frequency of contrast medium-induced nephropathy: a post-hoc analysis from the Dialysis-versus-Diuresis (DVD) trial Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 9, 2009; (2009) gfp582v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zoungas, T. Ninomiya, R. Huxley, A. Cass, M. Jardine, M. Gallagher, A. Patel, A. Vasheghani-Farahani, G. Sadigh, and V. Perkovic Systematic Review: Sodium Bicarbonate Treatment Regimens for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Ann Intern Med, November 3, 2009; 151(9): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Spargias, E. Adreanides, E. Demerouti, A. Gkouziouta, A. Manginas, G. Pavlides, V. Voudris, and D. V. Cokkinos Iloprost Prevents Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention Circulation, November 3, 2009; 120(18): 1793 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Brown, C. A. Block, D. J. Malenka, G. T. O'Connor, A. C. Schoolwerth, and C. A. Thompson Sodium Bicarbonate Plus N-Acetylcysteine Prophylaxis: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., November 1, 2009; 2(11): 1116 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ferrario, M. T. Barone, G. Landoni, A. Genderini, M. Heidemperger, M. Trezzi, E. Piccaluga, P. Danna, and D. Scorza Acetylcysteine and non-ionic isosmolar contrast-induced nephropathy--a randomized controlled study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 3103 - 3107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wessely, T. Koppara, C. Bradaric, M. Vorpahl, S. Braun, S. Schulz, J. Mehilli, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, and for the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Followin Choice of Contrast Medium in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. J. Hoste, J. J. De Waele, S. A. Gevaert, S. Uchino, and J. A. Kellum Sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 23, 2009; (2009) gfp389v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Reed, P. Meier, U. U. Tamhane, K. B. Welch, M. Moscucci, and H. S. Gurm The Relative Renal Safety of Iodixanol Compared With Low-Osmolar Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 645 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Palevsky Defining Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1151 - 1153. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Solomon, R. Mehran, M. K. Natarajan, S. Doucet, R. E. Katholi, C. S. Staniloae, S. K. Sharma, M. Labinaz, J. L. Gelormini, and B. J. Barrett Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Long-Term Adverse Events: Cause and Effect? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1162 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Charytan, L. Wallentin, B. Lagerqvist, R. Spacek, R. J. De Winter, N. M. Stern, E. Braunwald, C. P. Cannon, and N. K. Choudhry Early Angiography in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Collaborative Systematic Review Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2009; 4(6): 1032 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Windhausen, A. Hirsch, J. Fischer, P. M. van der Zee, G. T. Sanders, J. P. van Straalen, J. H. Cornel, J. G.P. Tijssen, F. W.A. Verheugt, R. J. de Winter, et al. Cystatin C for Enhancement of Risk Stratification in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with an Increased Troponin T Clin. Chem., June 1, 2009; 55(6): 1118 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Elahi, S. Asopa, A. Pflueger, N. Hakim, and B. Matata Acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: impact of early versus late haemofiltration on morbidity and mortality Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 854 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Noiri, K. Doi, K. Negishi, T. Tanaka, Y. Hamasaki, T. Fujita, D. Portilla, and T. Sugaya Urinary fatty acid-binding protein 1: an early predictive biomarker of kidney injury Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): F669 - F679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Harmon, S. P. Duffy, M. V. Terneus, J. G. Ball, and M. A. Valentovic Characterization of a novel model for investigation of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2009; 24(3): 763 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Meyer, M. M. LeWinter, S. P. Bell, Z. Chen, D. E. Selby, D. K. Singla, and H. L. Dauerman N-Acetylcysteine-Enhanced Contrast Provides Cardiorenal Protection J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 215 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ledneva, S. Karie, V. Launay-Vacher, N. Janus, and G. Deray Renal Safety of Gadolinium-based Contrast Media in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 618 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goldfarb, P. A. McCullough, J. McDermott, and S. B. Gay Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Specialty-Specific Protocols for Interventional Radiology, Diagnostic Computed Tomography Radiology, and Interventional Cardiology Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2009; 84(2): 170 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Heinrich, L. Haberle, V. Muller, W. Bautz, and M. Uder Nephrotoxicity of Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Compared with Nonionic Low-osmolar Contrast Media: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 68 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bouzas-Mosquera, J. M. Vazquez-Rodriguez, and J. Peteiro Radiographic Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Patient Mortality-1 Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2008; 83(12): 1412 - 1412. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.J. Hopyan, D.J. Gladstone, G. Mallia, J. Schiff, A.J. Fox, S.P. Symons, B.H. Buck, S.E. Black, and R.I. Aviv Renal Safety of CT Angiography and Perfusion Imaging in the Emergency Evaluation of Acute Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1826 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Weinreb Which Study When? Is Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging Safer than Iodine-enhanced CT? Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 3 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. From, B. J. Bartholmai, A. W. Williams, S. S. Cha, and F. S. McDonald Mortality Associated With Nephropathy After Radiographic Contrast Exposure Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2008; 83(10): 1095 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Solomon Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Is There a Risk after Intravenous Contrast? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1242 - 1243. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. Billings IV, S. W. C. Chen, M. Kim, S. W. Park, J. H. Song, S. Wang, J. Herman, V. D'Agati, and H. T. Lee {alpha}2-Adrenergic agonists protect against radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): F741 - F748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maioli, A. Toso, M. Leoncini, M. Gallopin, D. Tedeschi, C. Micheletti, and F. Bellandi Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Saline for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 19, 2008; 52(8): 599 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kuhn, N. Chen, D. V. Sahani, D. Reimer, E. J. R. van Beek, J. P. Heiken, and G. J. So The PREDICT Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Low- or Isoosmolar Contrast Agent Exposure Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Nguyen, P. Suranyi, J. G. Ravenel, P. K. Randall, P. B. Romano, K. A. Strom, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf Iso-Osmolality versus Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Medium at Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT: Effect on Kidney Function Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 97 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Bittl Damage Control for Renal Artery Stenting Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2724 - 2726. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Boxt CT angiography in children: it is accurate, but is it safe? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 340 - 342. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Waikar, K. D. Liu, and G. M. Chertow Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 844 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. McCullough Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1419 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nusca, R. Melfi, and G. Di Sciascio Review: Percutaneous coronary interventions and statins therapy Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 101 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Kane, A. W. Stanson, D. Kalnicka, D. W. Rosenthal, C. U. Lee, S. C. Textor, and V. D. Garovic Comparison between gadolinium and iodine contrast for percutaneous intervention in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: clinical outcomes Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1233 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Shetty, K. G. Bis, A. R. Vyas, A. Kumar, A. Anderson, and M. Balasubramaniam Contrast Volume Reduction with Superior Vena Cava Catheter-Directed Coronary CT Angiography: Comparison with Peripheral IV Contrast Enhancement in a Swine Model Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): W247 - W254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gottlieb and J. A.C. Lima Screening High-Risk Patients With Computed Tomography Angiography Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1318 - 1332. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Inrig, U. D. Patel, L. P. Briley, L. She, B. S. Gillespie, J. D. Easton, E. J. Topol, and L. A. Szczech Mortality, kidney disease and cardiac procedures following acute coronary syndrome Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 934 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Singh, B. J. Gersh, S. Li, J. S. Rumsfeld, J. A. Spertus, S. M. O'Brien, R. M. Suri, and E. D. Peterson Mayo Clinic Risk Score for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Predicts In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Kane, B. J. Doyle, A. Lerman, G. W. Barsness, P. J. Best, and C. S. Rihal Ultra-low contrast volumes reduce rates of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 89 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rudnick and H. Feldman Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: What Are the True Clinical Consequences? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 263 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. From, B. J. Bartholmai, A. W. Williams, S. S. Cha, A. Pflueger, and F. S. McDonald Sodium Bicarbonate is Associated with an Increased Incidence of Contrast Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 7977 Patients at Mayo Clinic Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 10 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sayin, S. Turhan, O. Akyurek, and M. Kilickap Gadolinium:Nonionic Contrast Media (1:1) Coronary Angiography in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Angiology, November 1, 2007; 58(5): 561 - 564. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. C. Wong and M. G. Irwin Contrast-induced nephropathy Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 474 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chen, E. A. Bridenbaugh, A. D. Akintola, J. M. Catania, V. S. Vaidya, J. V. Bonventre, A. C. Dearman, H. W. Sampson, D. C. Zawieja, R. C. Burghardt, et al. Increased susceptibility of aging kidney to ischemic injury: identification of candidate genes changed during aging, but corrected by caloric restriction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1272 - F1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-T. Lee, K.-J. Chou, C.-P. Liu, G.-Y. Mar, C.-L. Chen, C.-Y. Hsu, H.-C. Fang, and H.-M. Chung Renal Protection for Coronary Angiography in Advanced Renal Failure Patients by Prophylactic Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 11, 2007; 50(11): 1015 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Laskey, C. Jenkins, F. Selzer, O. C. Marroquin, R. L. Wilensky, R. Glaser, H. A. Cohen, D. R. Holmes Jr, and for the NHLBI Dynamic Registry Investigators Volume-to-Creatinine Clearance Ratio: A Pharmacokinetically Based Risk Factor for Prediction of Early Creatinine Increase After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 14, 2007; 50(7): 584 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W H Fung, C. C Szeto, and C. M Yu Preventing contrast nephropathy in catheter laboratory Heart, June 1, 2007; 93(6): 654 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O Onbasili, Y. Yeniceriglu, P. Agaoglu, A. Karul, T. Tekten, H. Akar, and G. Discigil Trimetazidine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary procedures Heart, June 1, 2007; 93(6): 698 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kumar, K. G. Bis, A. Shetty, A. Vyas, A. Anderson, M. Balasubramaniam, W. O'Neill, and W. Stein Aortic Root Catheter-Directed Coronary CT Angiography in Swine: Coronary Enhancement with Minimum Volume of Iodinated Contrast Material Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): W415 - W422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Hillis, B. H. Cuthbertson, and B. L. Croal Renal function, revascularization and risk Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2007; 28(7): 782 - 784. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Recio-Mayoral, M. Chaparro, B. Prado, R. Cozar, I. Mendez, D. Banerjee, J. C. Kaski, J. Cubero, and J. M. Cruz The Reno-Protective Effect of Hydration With Sodium Bicarbonate Plus N-Acetylcysteine in Patients Undergoing Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The RENO Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1283 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Deo, M. Fogel, and S. E. Cowper Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: A Population Study Examining the Relationship of Disease Development to Gadolinium Exposure Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 2(2): 264 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Jo, T.-J. Youn, B.-K. Koo, J.-S. Park, H.-J. Kang, Y.-S. Cho, W.-Y. Chung, G.-W. Joo, I.-H. Chae, D.-J. Choi, et al. Renal Toxicity Evaluation and Comparison Between Visipaque (Iodixanol) and Hexabrix (Ioxaglate) in Patients With Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Coronary Angiography: The RECOVER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 924 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. McCullough, M. E. Bertrand, J. A. Brinker, and F. Stacul A Meta-Analysis of the Renal Safety of Isosmolar Iodixanol Compared With Low-Osmolar Contrast Media J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 692 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Mannebach, R. S. Dieter, and D. S. Marks Use of Gadolinium-Based Angiography for Renal Artery Stenting in a Patient With Renal Insufficiency: A Case Report Angiology, August 1, 2006; 57(4): 526 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marenzi, E. Assanelli, I. Marana, G. Lauri, J. Campodonico, M. Grazi, M. De Metrio, S. Galli, F. Fabbiocchi, P. Montorsi, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N. Engl. J. Med., June 29, 2006; 354(26): 2773 - 2782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pannu, N. Wiebe, M. Tonelli, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network Prophylaxis Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2765 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Downes, M. Heinrich, and M. Uder In vitro study of various iodinated contrast media. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 918 - 921. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Elicker, Y. S. Cypel, and J. C. Weinreb IV contrast administration for CT: a survey of practices for the screening and prevention of contrast nephropathy. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1651 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Michishita and Z. Fujii A Novel Contrast Removal System From the Coronary Sinus Using an Adsorbing Column During Coronary Angiography in a Porcine Model J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1866 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tepel, P. Aspelin, and N. Lameire Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Approach Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1799 - 1806. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Xue, F. Daniels, R. A. Star, P. L. Kimmel, P. W. Eggers, B. A. Molitoris, J. Himmelfarb, and A. J. Collins Incidence and Mortality of Acute Renal Failure in Medicare Beneficiaries, 1992 to 2001 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 1135 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moscucci, E. K. Rogers, C. Montoye, D. E. Smith, D. Share, M. O'Donnell, A. Maxwell-Eward, W. L. Meengs, A. C. De Franco, K. Patel, et al. Association of a Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative With Practice and Outcome Variations of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 814 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Barrett and P. S. Parfrey Preventing Nephropathy Induced by Contrast Medium N. Engl. J. Med., January 26, 2006; 354(4): 379 - 386. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-R. Movahed, J. Wong, and S. Molloi Removal of Iodine Contrast From Coronary Sinus in Swine During Coronary Angiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 465 - 467. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Detrenis, M. Meschi, S. Musini, and G. Savazzi Lights and shadows on the pathogenesis of contrast-induced nephropathy: state of the art Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 1542 - 1550. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Cowburn, H. Patel, R. R. Pipes, and J. D. Parker Contrast nephropathy post cardiac resynchronization therapy: An under-recognized complication with important morbidity Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2005; 7(5): 899 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Brinker, C. J. Davidson, and W. Laskey Preventing in-hospital cardiac and renal complications in high-risk PCI patients Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2005; 7(suppl_G): G13 - G24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V O Gomes, C E Poli de Figueredo, P Caramori, R Lasevitch, L C Bodanese, A Araujo, A P Roedel, A P Caramori, F S Brito Jr, H G Bezerra, et al. N-acetylcysteine does not prevent contrast induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterisation with an ionic low osmolality contrast medium: a multicentre clinical trial Heart, June 1, 2005; 91(6): 774 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Heinrich, M. K. Kuhlmann, A. Grgic, M. Heckmann, B. Kramann, and M. Uder Cytotoxic Effects of Ionic High-osmolar, Nonionic Monomeric, and Nonionic Iso-osmolar Dimeric Iodinated Contrast Media on Renal Tubular Cells in Vitro Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 843 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Goldenberg and S. Matetzky Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 24, 2005; 172(11): 1461 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Weisbord and P. M. Palevsky Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 63 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Gross, M. J. de Azevedo, S. P. Silveiro, L. H. Canani, M. L. Caramori, and T. Zelmanovitz Diabetic Nephropathy: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment Diabetes Care, January 1, 2005; 28(1): 164 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maeder, M. Klein, T. Fehr, and H. Rickli Contrast nephropathy: Review focusing on prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1763 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marenzi, G. Lauri, E. Assanelli, J. Campodonico, M. De Metrio, I. Marana, M. Grazi, F. Veglia, and A. L. Bartorelli Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1780 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Spargias, E. Alexopoulos, S. Kyrzopoulos, P. Iacovis, D. C. Greenwood, A. Manginas, V. Voudris, G. Pavlides, C. E. Buller, D. Kremastinos, et al. Ascorbic Acid Prevents Contrast-Mediated Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2837 - 2842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Ix, C. E. McCulloch, and G. M. Chertow Theophylline for the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy: a meta-analysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2747 - 2753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mehran, E. D. Aymong, E. Nikolsky, Z. Lasic, I. Iakovou, M. Fahy, G. S. Mintz, A. J. Lansky, J. W. Moses, G. W. Stone, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1393 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Trachiotis, D. Hanumara, L. McKenna, P. Corso, and A. Pfister Surgical revascularization after acute myocardial infarction in patients with end-stage renal disease Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 26(4): 671 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Goldenberg, M. Shechter, S. Matetzky, M. Jonas, M. Adam, H. Pres, D. Elian, O. Agranat, E. Schwammenthal, and V. Guetta Oral acetylcysteine as an adjunct to saline hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy following coronary angiography: A randomized controlled trial and review of the current literature Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2004; 25(3): 212 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gami and V. D. Garovic Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2004; 79(2): 211 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Holmes Jr Risk Stratification and Interventional Cardiology: Robert L. Frye Lecture Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2003; 78(12): 1507 - 1518. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stone, P. A. McCullough, J. A. Tumlin, N. E. Lepor, H. Madyoon, P. Murray, A. Wang, A. A. Chu, G. L. Schaer, M. Stevens, et al. Fenoldopam Mesylate for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, November 5, 2003; 290(17): 2284 - 2291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marenzi, I. Marana, G. Lauri, E. Assanelli, M. Grazi, J. Campodonico, D. Trabattoni, F. Fabbiocchi, P. Montorsi, and A. L. Bartorelli The Prevention of Radiocontrast-Agent-Induced Nephropathy by Hemofiltration N. Engl. J. Med., October 2, 2003; 349(14): 1333 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Gruber, C. J. Shapiro, C. Braun, R. Birck, C. M. Bridges, V. S. Swaroop, M.-T. Cuddihy, P. Aspelin, and K. J. Berg Nephropathy Induced by Contrast Medium N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2003; 348(22): 2257 - 2259. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |