Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;105:2229
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000013097.84796.2A
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Almquist, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Almquist, A. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Cardiac development

(Circulation. 2002;105:2229.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Images in Cardiovascular Medicine

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Monozygotic Twins

Barry J. Maron, MD; Susan A. Casey, RN; Adrian K. Almquist, MD

From The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation Minneapolis, Minn.

Correspondence to Barry J. Maron, MD, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 920 E 28th St, Suite 60, Minneapolis, MN 55407. E-mail hcm.maron{at}mhif.org

Male monozygotic twins, age 18 years, were both recognized to have clinical findings of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Both were asymptomatic and had been active in sports; there was a family history of 3 HCM-related sudden deaths at ages 18, 32, and 52 years. The twins showed a striking similarity in phenotypic expression of HCM, in which distribution and magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy was virtually identical. In both patients, hypertrophy was predominant and virtually confined to the posterior portion of ventricular septum and contiguous posterior (inferior) free wall; maximum wall thickness was 18 mm in twin A and 20 mm in twin B (Figure). Anterior ventricular septum (the region most commonly hypertrophied in HCM), as well as anterolateral and posterior free wall and apex were all largely spared from the hypertrophic process. Left ventricular end-diastolic cavity dimensions (42 mm and 40 mm, respectively) and left atrial size (30 mm and 34 mm) were very similar. Relatively mild systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, preferentially involving the posterior leaflet (a finding regarded as specific for HCM), was present in both twins without mitral-septal contact; continuous wave Doppler showed normal outflow tract velocities (<1.5 m/s) with no evidence of outflow obstruction. The 12-lead ECG did show some differences in precise pattern; there was T-wave inversion in inferior leads II, III, and AVF for twin A, and T-wave inversion in V2 to V5 with prominent Q waves in III, V5, and V6 in twin B.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Parasternal short-axis echocardiograms obtained from twins A and B. Distribution of hypertrophy is the same in both and is virtually confined to the posterior and inferior segment of ventricular septum (pvs; arrows). Maximum wall thickness is 18 mm in twin A and 20 mm in twin B. Note that anterior ventricular septum (avs) is predominantly of normal thickness in both patients. fw indicates left ventricular free wall. Calibration marks are 10 mm apart.

This opportunity to assess phenotypic expression in monozygotic twins with HCM is unique. The virtually identical distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy in both twins supports the view that genetic background represents the primary determinant influencing the HCM phenotype, and by inference suggests that environmental factors may have limited impact on the morphological expression of HCM. Hypertrophy predominantly involving posterior ventricular septum is rare in HCM (1% of cases), substantiating the claim that the phenotypic similarity evident in the twins is not likely to be coincidental.

Footnotes

The editor of Images in Cardiovascular Medicine is Hugh A. McAllister, Jr, MD, Chief, Department of Pathology, St Luke’s Episcopal Hospital and Texas Heart Institute, and Clinical Professor of Pathology, University of Texas Medical School and Baylor College of Medicine.

Circulation encourages readers to submit cardiovascular images to the Circulation Editorial Office, St Luke’s Episcopal Hospital/Texas Heart Institute, 6720 Bertner Ave, MC1-267, Houston, TX 77030.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Almquist, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Almquist, A. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Cardiac development