Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;105:1631-1634
Published online before print March 25, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000014984.95520.AD
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/14/1631    most recent
01.CIR.0000014984.95520.ADv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gambhir, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gambhir, S. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diagnostic Imaging
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Other imaging

(Circulation. 2002;105:1631.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

Optical Imaging of Cardiac Reporter Gene Expression in Living Rats

Joseph C. Wu, MD; Masayuki Inubushi, MD; Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan, PhD; Heinrich R. Schelbert, MD; Sanjiv S. Gambhir, MD PhD

From the Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging (J.C.W., G.S., S.S.G.), Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology (J.C.W., M.I., G.S., H.S., S.S.G.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (J.C.W.), UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Sanjiv S. Gambhir, 700 Westwood Plaza, BRI B3-399A, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1770. E-mail sgambhir{at}mednet.ucla.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Studies of cardiac gene transfer rely on postmortem analysis using histologic staining or enzyme assays. Noninvasive imaging of the temporal and spatial characteristics of cardiac gene expression in the same subject offers significant advantages.

Methods and Results Rats underwent direct myocardial injection via left thoracotomy with adenovirus-expressing firefly luciferase (Ad-CMV-Fluc; n=30). The reporter substrate D-luciferin was injected intraperitoneally. Serial images were acquired by use of a cooled charged couple detector (CCD) camera. Results are expressed as relative light unit per minute (RLU/min). Rats transduced with 1x109 plaque-forming units show decremental cardiac luciferase activity over time: 152 070±21 170 (day 2), 195 806±62 630 (day 5), 7250±2941 (day 8), and 2040±971 RLU/min (day 14). To assess the detection sensitivity, serially diluted titers of Ad-CMV-Fluc were injected: 1x109 (195 393±14 896), 1x108 (33 777±18 179), 1x107 (417±91), 1x106 (185±64), 1x105 (53±1), and control (54±1) (P<0.05 for 1x109, 1x108, and 1x107 plaque-forming units versus control adenovirus-expressing mutant thymidine kinase [Ad-CMV-HSV1-sr39tk]; n=3). Finally, rats were euthanized, and in vitro luciferase activity correlated with in vivo CCD signals (r2=0.92).

Conclusions This study demonstrates for the first time the feasibility of imaging the location, magnitude, and time course of cardiac reporter gene expression in living rats. Cardiac gene therapy studies could be aided with wider application of this approach.


Key Words: imaging • gene therapy • viruses • heart diseases • pharmacokinetics


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Efficient and long-term reporter gene expressions in the myocardium using viral and nonviral vectors have been reported since the early 1990s.13 However, single "snapshot" assessment of reporter gene activity by postmortem tissue sampling precludes longitudinal analysis within the same animal. Therefore, the development of a simple and reproducible method for in vivo imaging of gene expression in response to physiological, hormonal, or promoter influences would be important for gene therapy studies.

Advances in imaging technologies have made visualization of in vivo reporter gene expression possible. Current approaches include single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and optical fluorescent and bioluminescent imaging.4 Among these modalities, optical bioluminescent imaging using a cooled charged couple detector (CCD) camera provides a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective option for small animal studies. We have recently shown that CCD imaging of adenoviral-mediated firefly luciferase (Ad-CMV-Fluc) reporter gene expression in skeletal muscles of living mice is feasible, reproducible, and quantitative.5

To date, there has been no published report on noninvasive imaging of cardiac gene expression. We therefore explored the possibility of using a cooled CCD camera for imaging the location, magnitude, and duration of reporter gene expression in the myocardium of living rats.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Construction of Recombinant Adenoviruses
Construction of replication-defective adenovirus carrying firefly luciferase (Fluc) driven by a constitutive cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (Ad-CMV-Fluc) and of the control adenovirus carrying the mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (Ad-CMV-HSV1-sr39tk) has been described.5,6 The firefly luciferase gene and enzyme are subsequently referred to as Fluc and FL, respectively.

Animals
Thirty-four Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 250 to 350 g; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) were studied under protocols approved by the University Committee on the Use and Care of Animals. Rats received 4:1 mixture of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) intraperitoneally for anesthesia; banamine (2.5 mg/kg) for pain relief; atropine (40 µg/kg) for prevention of salivation and bradycardia; and normal saline (3 mL) for volume replacement. One animal died from respiratory distress after extubation.

Myocardial Injection of Adenovirus
The anesthetized rats were ventilated with a Harvard respirator. A left thoracotomy was performed to expose the beating heart. Varying titers of Ad-CMV-Fluc were injected into the anterolateral wall of the left ventricle using a 30-gauge needle with 30 to 50 µL of injectate volume. Control animals were injected with 1x109 plaque-forming units (pfu) of Ad-CMV-HSV1-sr39tk.

Quantification of Bioluminescence From Cooled CCD Camera and Biochemical Analysis
The Xenogen In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) consists of a cooled CCD camera mounted on a light-tight specimen chamber, a cryogenic refrigeration unit, a camera controller, and a computer system for data analysis. Both the IVIS and its imaging analysis software are commercially available (Xenogen Corp). D-Luciferin was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 125 mg/kg body weight (Xenogen Corp). Serial images were acquired every 2 to 6 days. The bioluminescence was quantified as described previously.5 Rats were euthanized at various time points (days 2 to 14) after viral transduction. Biochemical assays were performed as reported previously by a luminometer (Turner Design-20/20).5

Data Analysis
All data are given as mean±SEM. For statistical analysis, the 2-tailed Student’s t test was used. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Luciferase activities from in vivo CCD imaging and in vitro luminometer assays were correlated by least-squares linear regression.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
FL Activity in Myocardium
To assess the time course of cardiac FL activity, a cooled CCD camera was used to image the same animal for 2 weeks (Figure 1). On average, cardiac FL peaks between days 2 to 5 and declines rapidly afterward: 152 070±21 170 (day 2), 195 806±62 630 (day 5), 7250±2941 (day 8), and 2040±971 relative light unit (RLU)/min (day 14) (n=5). All values are statistically significant (P<0.05) compared with rats injected with control Ad-CMV-HSV1-sr39tk, which yield background signals of 54±1 RLU/min in the thoracic region of interest (n=3). Because of leakage of adenovirus from the myocardium, the liver FL activity predominates after day 8: 7780±3601 (day 2), 70 187±41 169 (day 5), 180 257±159 924 (day 8), and 227 504±201 760 RLU/min (day 14).



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Optical imaging of cardiac reporter gene expression. Control rat transfected with Ad-CMV-HSV1-sr39tk (1x109 pfu) shows background signal. Study rat transfected with Ad-CMV-Fluc (1x109 pfu) emits significant cardiac FL activity at day 2, day 5, day 8, and day 14 (P<0.05 vs control). Significant hepatic FL activity is seen, starting at day 8. The same rat with heart explanted and sliced into 3 sections at day 14. FL activity is localized at anterolateral wall of left ventricle along the site of virus injection. Note the bioluminescent scales are different for control rat, study rat days 2 to 5, and study rat days 8 to 14 to account for the wide range of cardiac FL activity observed. RA indicates right atrium; RV, right ventricle; and LV, left ventricle.

Detection Sensitivity
To determine the minimal viral titer of Ad-CMV-Fluc that can be imaged in the myocardium of living rats, serially diluted titers were injected into the heart (1x109 to 1x105 pfu; n=3 each). At day 2, significant signals of cardiac FL transduced with 1x107 pfu of Ad-CMV-Fluc are detected: 195 393±14 896 (1x109), 33 777±18 179 (1x108), 417±91 (1x107), 185±64 (1x106), 53±1 (1x105), and 54±1 RLU/min (control) (P<0.05 for 1x109, 1x108, and 1x107 pfu versus control) (Figure 2A).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Detection threshold of cooled CCD camera using serially diluted titers of Ad-CMV-Fluc (*P<0.05 vs control; n=3 each titer). B, Correlation of in vivo CCD imaging compared with in vitro biochemical assays in myocardial tissues (n=24).

Correlation of In Vivo CCD Signal Versus In Vitro Luminometer Activity
To verify that bioluminescence obtained by noninvasive imaging reflects actual FL enzyme activity in the heart, animals were euthanized, tissues were homogenized, and in vitro cardiac FL activity was determined. Additional rats were transduced with 1x109 pfu Ad-CMV-Fluc, scanned, and euthanized at other time points: day 1 (n=2), day 3 (n=3), day 4 (n=2), day 6 (n=1), and day 9 (n=1). Regression analysis shows a high degree of correlation between results obtained by in vivo CCD imaging and by in vitro biochemical assays of myocardium (r2=0.92) (Figure 2B).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study demonstrates for the first time that gene expression in the myocardium of living subjects can be monitored noninvasively. The location, magnitude, and persistence of Fluc reporter gene expression in the same animal were followed for 2 weeks. Cardiac FL activity peaks within the first 3 to 5 days and declines rapidly thereafter because of mounting of host inflammatory and cellular responses against adenoviral vectors.7 Consistent with earlier observations, Fluc expression via direct myocardial injection was localized to the area surrounding the site of injection.2 The detection threshold of CCD camera is remarkable, down to 1x107 pfu of Ad-CMV-Fluc. Most importantly, results from in vivo cardiac CCD imaging correlate well with in vitro enzyme assays. These findings suggest that in vivo cardiac CCD imaging can be used to monitor gene expression in lieu of or in parallel with biochemical analysis.

We believe optical imaging has many applications for cardiac gene therapy studies. Because of its noninvasive nature, ideal conditions needed for cardiac gene expression can be determined quickly and accurately. These include analysis of vectors, delivery techniques, promoter specificity, and transgenic models. Likewise, pharmaceutical agents that prolong or enhance therapeutic cardiac gene expression can be screened. In our study, the gradual increase of FL activity in the liver was likely affected by the quality of injection, with egress of adenovirus from the myocardium into systemic circulation and eventual binding to Coxsackie-adenovirus receptors on hepatocytes.2,3,8 Substituting a cardiac tissue-specific promoter (eg, myosin light chain kinase) for the constitutive CMV promoter may diminish extra-cardiac activity.8 Furthermore, with its high detection sensitivity ({approx}1x107 pfu for adenovirus), CCD imaging may allow monitoring of gene delivery by vectors with low transduction efficiency (eg, plasmid DNA). Finally, the observed variability of FL activity among different rats implies considerable individual variations in response to gene transfer and thus emphasizes the need for noninvasive monitoring.

Several features make optical gene imaging unique. The CCD camera operates by converting photons striking a CCD pixel into electrons, allowing it to register and detect visible through near-infrared light signals.5 Because photons are generated only when the reporter probe (D-luciferin) interacts with the reporter protein (FL) intracellularly, this "smart" reporter probe yields minimal background signal, as shown by control thymidine kinase rats injected with D-luciferin. In contrast, radiotracers used with SPECT and PET emit radioactivity constantly, irrespective of reporter probe/protein interaction, therefore generating significant background signal.4 In addition, FL enzyme turnover in the presence of D-luciferin has a fast half-life (T1/2=3 hours), and FL levels are related linearly with light emissions up to 7 orders of magnitude.5 These properties allow for real time and quantitative measurements of Fluc gene expression.

The main drawbacks of bioluminescent reporter gene imaging are 2-fold. First, CCD imaging is limited to small animals because the efficiency of light transmission is dependent on both tissue type and tissue scattering. Estimates from our prior in vivo studies in mice show that attenuation from skin and muscle is 2- to 3-fold.5 Second, the optical images are not tomographic and cannot localize the exact site of gene expression within the heart from nearby organs. In contrast, the micro PET used in our laboratory has a 23-mm3 (or 8-mm3) resolution and yields 3D tomographic resolution.9 To further address the relative merits of each approach, we are currently exploring vectors in which both optical (Fluc) and PET reporter gene (HSV1-sr39tk) are co-expressed. Eventually, the goal is to indirectly study the expression of any therapeutic gene by linking it to a reporter gene that can be repetitively imaged.10

In summary, noninvasive monitoring of cardiac gene transfer offers significant advantages. Optical imaging of reporter gene expression in animal studies provides an accurate, practical, and cost-effective method to assess the efficiency of gene delivery and expression. Clinical catheter-based detection of vascular or myocardial reporter gene expression may also eventually be possible. Continued refinement of catheters that are shielded from extraneous sources of light, transmission of light via optical fibers, and portable highly sensitive cooled CCD cameras should help to translate these approaches into the clinical setting.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by funding from Department of Energy contract DE-FC03-87ER60615 (Dr Gambhir), National Institutes of Health RO1 CA82214-01 (Dr Gambhir), Small Animal Imaging Resource Program R24 CA92865 (Dr Gambhir), and an American Heart Association Western Affiliate postdoctoral grant (Dr Wu).

Received January 29, 2002; revision received February 15, 2002; accepted February 15, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science. 1990; 247: 1465–1468.

2. Guzman RJ, Lemarchand P, Crystal RG, et al. Efficient gene transfer into myocardium by direct injection of adenovirus vectors. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 1202–1207.

3. 2 Huard J, Lochmuller H, Acsadi G, et al. The route of administration is a major determinant of the transduction efficiency of rat tissues by adenoviral recombinants. Gene Ther. 1995; 2: 107–115.

4. Ray P, Bauer E, Iyer M, et al. Monitoring gene therapy with reporter gene expression. Semin Nuclear Med. 2001; 31: 312–320.

5. Wu JC, Sundaresan G, Iyer M, et al. Noninvasive optical imaging of firefly luciferase reporter gene expression in skeletal muscles of living mice. Mol Ther. 2001; 4: 297–306.

6. Gambhir SS, Bauer E, Black ME, et al. A mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase reporter gene shows improved sensitivity for imaging reporter gene expression with positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 2785–2790.

7. Yang Y, Li Q, Ertl HC, et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses to viral antigens create barriers to lung-directed gene therapy with recombinant adenoviruses. J Virol. 1995; 69: 2004–2015.

8. Franz WM, Rothmann T, Frey N, et al. Analysis of tissue-specific gene delivery by recombinant adenoviruses containing cardiac-specific promoters. Cardiovasc Res. 1997; 35: 560–566.

9. Cherry SR, Gambhir SS. Use of positron emission tomography in animal research. ILAR J. 2001; 42: 219–232.

10. Yu Y, Annala AJ, Barrio JR, et al. Quantification of target gene expression by imaging reporter gene expression in living animals. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 933–937.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
T.-J. CHANG, Y.-J. CHANG, T.-Y. HO, C.-Y. HSIANG, C.-Y. YU, T.-W. LEE, W.-J. LIN, and C.-H. CHANG
Noninvasive Bioluminescent and MicroPET Imaging for the Regulation of NF-{kappa}B in Human Hepatoma-bearing Mice
Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 987 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
M. Nahrendorf, D. E. Sosnovik, B. A. French, F. K. Swirski, F. Bengel, M. M. Sadeghi, J. R. Lindner, J. C. Wu, D. L. Kraitchman, Z. A. Fayad, et al.
Multimodality Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging, Part II
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 56 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
T.-C. Hung, Y. Suzuki, T. Urashima, A. Caffarelli, G. Hoyt, A. Y. Sheikh, A. C. Yeung, I. Weissman, R. C. Robbins, J. W.M. Bulte, et al.
Multimodality Evaluation of the Viability of Stem Cells Delivered Into Different Zones of Myocardial Infarction
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2008; 1(1): 6 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. De, A. M. Loening, and S. S. Gambhir
An Improved Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer Strategy for Imaging Intracellular Events in Single Cells and Living Subjects
Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7175 - 7183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. C. Wu, F. M. Bengel, and S. S. Gambhir
Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 337 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Zhou, P. D. Acton, and V. A. Ferrari
Imaging Stem Cells Implanted in Infarcted Myocardium
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2094 - 2106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C-L Hsieh, Z Xie, Z-Y Liu, J E Green, W D Martin, M W Datta, F Yeung, D Pan, and L W K Chung
A luciferase transgenic mouse model: visualization of prostate development and its androgen responsiveness in live animals
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 35(2): 293 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Fujishiro, S.-i. Takeda, Y. Takeno, K. Takeuchi, Y. Ogata, M. Takahashi, Y. Hakamata, T. Kaneko, T. Murakami, T. Okada, et al.
Gene transfer to the rat kidney in vivo and ex vivo using an adenovirus vector: factors influencing transgene expression
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1385 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
P. J Cassidy and G. K Radda
Molecular imaging perspectives
J R Soc Interface, June 22, 2005; 2(3): 133 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. Zhou, D. H. Thomas, H. Qiao, H. S. Bal, S.-R. Choi, A. Alavi, V. A. Ferrari, H. F. Kung, and P. D. Acton
In Vivo Detection of Stem Cells Grafted in Infarcted Rat Myocardium
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 816 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. V. Simoes, M. Miyagawa, S. Reder, C. Stadele, R. Haubner, W. Linke, T. Lehner, P. Epple, M. Anton, M. Schwaiger, et al.
Myocardial Kinetics of Reporter Probe 124I-FIAU in Isolated Perfused Rat Hearts After In Vivo Adenoviral Transfer of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Thymidine Kinase Reporter Gene
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 98 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. M. Botnar, A. S. Perez, S. Witte, A. J. Wiethoff, J. Laredo, J. Hamilton, W. Quist, E. C. Parsons Jr, A. Vaidya, A. Kolodziej, et al.
In Vivo Molecular Imaging of Acute and Subacute Thrombosis Using a Fibrin-Binding Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
Circulation, April 27, 2004; 109(16): 2023 - 2029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
F. A. Jaffer and R. Weissleder
Seeing Within: Molecular Imaging of the Cardiovascular System
Circ. Res., March 5, 2004; 94(4): 433 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. M. Bengel, M. Anton, T. Richter, M. V. Simoes, R. Haubner, J. Henke, W. Erhardt, S. Reder, T. Lehner, W. Brandau, et al.
Noninvasive Imaging of Transgene Expression by Use of Positron Emission Tomography in a Pig Model of Myocardial Gene Transfer
Circulation, October 28, 2003; 108(17): 2127 - 2133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. C. Wu, I. Y. Chen, G. Sundaresan, J.-J. Min, A. De, J.-H. Qiao, M. C. Fishbein, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Cell Transplantation in Living Animals Using Optical Bioluminescence and Positron Emission Tomography
Circulation, September 16, 2003; 108(11): 1302 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
F. E. Yull, W. Han, E. D. Jansen, M. B. Everhart, R. T. Sadikot, J. W. Christman, and T. S. Blackwell
Bioluminescent Detection of Endotoxin Effects on HIV-1 LTR-driven Transcription in Vivo
J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2003; 51(6): 741 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J.-C. Richard, Z. Zhou, D. E. Ponde, C. S. Dence, P. Factor, P. N. Reynolds, G. D. Luker, V. Sharma, T. Ferkol, D. Piwnica-Worms, et al.
Imaging Pulmonary Gene Expression with Positron Emission Tomography
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2003; 167(9): 1257 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. J. Stephens and V. J. Allan
Light Microscopy Techniques for Live Cell Imaging
Science, April 4, 2003; 300(5616): 82 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Ray, A. M. Wu, and S. S. Gambhir
Optical Bioluminescence and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of a Novel Fusion Reporter Gene in Tumor Xenografts of Living Mice
Cancer Res., March 15, 2003; 63(6): 1160 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
T. F. Massoud and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2003; 17(5): 545 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Inubushi, J. C. Wu, S. S. Gambhir, G. Sundaresan, N. Satyamurthy, M. Namavari, S. Yee, J. R. Barrio, D. Stout, A. F. Chatziioannou, et al.
Positron-Emission Tomography Reporter Gene Expression Imaging in Rat Myocardium
Circulation, January 21, 2003; 107(2): 326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. C. Wu, M. Inubushi, G. Sundaresan, H. R. Schelbert, and S. S. Gambhir
Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Cardiac Reporter Gene Expression in Living Rats
Circulation, July 9, 2002; 106(2): 180 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/14/1631    most recent
01.CIR.0000014984.95520.ADv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gambhir, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gambhir, S. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diagnostic Imaging
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Other imaging