Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;104:I-16-I-20
doi: 10.1161/hc37t1.094545
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carr-White, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yacoub, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carr-White, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yacoub, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2001;104:I-16.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Incidence, Location, Pathology, and Significance of Pulmonary Homograft Stenosis After the Ross Operation

Gerald S. Carr-White, MRCP; Philip J. Kilner, MD, PhD; Jimmy K.F. Hon, MB, ChB; Thomas Rutledge, MBBS; Sue Edwards, BSc; Elisabeth D. Burman, SRN; Dudley J. Pennell, FRCP; Magdi H. Yacoub, FRS

Departments of Cardiology (G.S.C.-W.), Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (P.J.K., E.D.B., D.J.P.), and Academic Surgery (J.K.F.H., T.R., S.E., M.H.Y.), National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

Correspondence to Professor Sir Magdi Yacoub, Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, United Kingdom. E-mail g.carr-white{at}virgin.net


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The Ross operation has several theoretical advantages. However, concern exists regarding evolving pathology in the pulmonary homograft.

Methods and Results— Consecutive patients (n=144; mean age 31 years, range 2 months to 64 years) undergoing the Ross operation were studied between 1993 and 2000. Echocardiographic examination of the pulmonary homograft was performed immediately after surgery, then at yearly intervals for a mean interval of 48 months. Fifteen patients (mean age 37 years) in whom echocardiography revealed peak pulmonary gradients >=30 mm Hg (mean 46±18 mm Hg) underwent MRI with velocity mapping in a Picker 1.5-T magnet. No patient had more than mild pulmonary regurgitation. Four patients required reoperation for rapidly progressive pulmonary homograft stenosis; in all 4, there was macroscopic and microscopic evidence of a pronounced chronic adventitial reaction, with perivascular infiltration producing extrinsic compression. Freedom from any pulmonary homograft stenosis at 7-year follow-up was 79.7%, with instantaneous hazard falling to zero after 4 years. Freedom from reoperation at 7 years was 96.7%. In those studied with MRI, there was evidence of narrowing of the whole homograft or distal suture line in 14 of 15 patients, with obvious excess surrounding tissue in 11. Mean minimum diameter and peak velocity by MRI were 11±2 mm and 3.2±0.7 m/s, respectively. Multivariate analysis of patient-, surgery-, and homograft-related variables did not reveal any significant risk factors for development of neopulmonary stenosis.

Conclusions— Pulmonary homograft stenosis after the Ross operation is clinically important and appears to represent an early postoperative inflammatory reaction to the pulmonary homograft that leads to extrinsic compression and/or shrinkage.


Key Words: valves • surgery • magnetic resonance imaging • echocardiography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve has potential advantages, including improved hemodynamics, durability, and the ability to grow.1,2 Both intermediate and late results have demonstrated rates of survival and freedom from reoperation that compare favorably with other valve substitutes.3,4 The operation itself, however, involves insertion of a pulmonary homograft, and concern exists about the development of neopulmonary dysfunction, particularly stenosis. The aim of the present study was to describe the incidence and severity of pulmonary homograft dysfunction in a series of 144 consecutive patients. In addition, by using MRI, we hoped to characterize the location and functional significance of the dysfunction, and by combining this with operative histology, to examine the underlying mechanisms. Finally, we attempted to identify potential determinants of pulmonary homograft dysfunction.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Selection
Consecutive patients (n=144) operated on by one surgeon (M.H.Y.) at one National Health Service (NHS) trust (the Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS trust) between September 1993 and June 2000 were studied. Patient demographics and preoperative variables are shown in the Table. Local ethics committee approval was obtained before the study was begun, and full informed consent was obtained from each patient.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Demographics and Potential Determinants of Pulmonary Homograft Dysfunction

Operative Technique
Cardiopulmonary bypass with moderate hypothermia (30°C) was used, and myocardial protection was achieved by either antegrade crystalloid or cold-blood cardioplegia. All patients underwent aortic root replacement with coronary reimplantation. The right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) was reconstructed with the use of a large homovital or antibiotic sterilized (either fresh or cryopreserved) pulmonary homograft conduit inserted by either continuous or interrupted 4-0 sutures without inclusion of strips of prosthetic or autologous tissue for support. These suture lines were performed either before or after release of the aortic clamp. Full details of the operative technique have been published elsewhere.3,5

Echocardiographic Measurements
Transthoracic echocardiograms were performed with a Hewlett Packard Sonos 500 or 2000 machine. Maximum velocities across the pulmonary homograft were recorded with continuous-wave Doppler. Pulmonary regurgitation was graded by measuring the jet width as a fraction of the width of the RVOT, in addition to measuring the pressure half-time of the continuous-wave trace of pulmonary regurgitation. In each case, 3 consecutive beats were analyzed. Any pulmonary stenosis was defined as a peak gradient >=30 mm Hg.

Magnetic Resonance Measurements
In 15 of the 25 patients with echocardiographic pulmonary valve gradients >=30 mm Hg, MRI of the pulmonary homograft and right ventricle was undertaken. Imaging was performed with a Picker Edge 1.5-T whole-body system, with prospective ECG gating and a jacket receiver coil. After acquisition of transaxial spin echo multislice images, cine imaging (echo time 14 ms) in an oblique sagittal plane aligned with the RVOT was performed, followed by imaging in an orthogonal slice aligned with the stream through the homograft lumen. This last was used as scout for in-plane phase velocity mapping (echo time 4 ms) in an oblique sagittal plane now better aligned with the RVOT and the narrowest part of the homograft lumen. Image parameters were slice thickness of 6 mm, field of view of 350 mm, and 2x128 phase encoding steps.6 Peak velocity of the jet, location of the stenosis, and minimum stenosis diameter were recorded. Right ventricular hypertrophy was graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe on the basis of observation of cine images in the oblique sagittal and transaxial planes, the latter located through the tricuspid valve and right ventricle (echo time 14 ms). Time restraints prevented acquisition of further multiple cine images, hence right ventricular mass and volume were not measured. Comparable early postoperative MRI studies, acquired on a 0.5-T Picker system 6 and 14 days after Ross procedure, respectively, were found to have been performed in 2 of the above patients, which allowed assessment of homograft change since operation. In 5 additional patients who had MRI performed for other reasons 1 to 4 years after Ross operation, diameters of the homograft lumen were measured from oblique sagittal cine images.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with a commercially available software package (SPSS Inc). Comparison of demographic and preoperative or postoperative data between groups was performed with the use of an unpaired t test. Comparison of data over time was done with the use of a 1-way ANOVA. A P value of <0.05 was accepted as significant. Possible determinants of pulmonary homograft stenosis were assessed by a logistic multiple regression model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to represent freedom from dysfunction at various time points.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
There were 4 deaths in our series. None were related to pathology in the pulmonary homograft.

Echocardiographic Data
No patient had more than mild pulmonary regurgitation. Mean echocardiographic follow-up was 48 months (range 7 to 96 months), and at the pre–hospital-discharge early examination, none of the patients had evidence of any homograft stenosis. Twenty-five (17%) of the 144 patients studied developed echocardiographic evidence of some degree of pulmonary stenosis (defined as a maximum postoperative gradient at any time point >=30 mm Hg), and the progression over time for each of these patients is shown in Figure 1. Of these, 8 had severe stenosis (defined as a peak gradient >50 mm Hg). Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating cumulative freedom from any stenosis (peak gradient >=30 mm Hg) and reoperation are shown in Figure 2. Reoperation was undertaken when the patient developed either worsening symptoms, an objective deterioration in exercise tolerance, or worsening right ventricular function. The cumulative probability of freedom from reoperation at 1, 2, and 7 years was 98.5%, 96.7%, and 96.7%, respectively. The cumulative probability of freedom from any pulmonary artery stenosis at 1, 2, 4, and 7 years was 86.1%, 83.4%, 79.7%, and 79.7%, respectively. Figure 3 illustrates the instantaneous hazard function for the development of any pulmonary homograft stenosis over time. The hazard was relatively high in the first year after surgery but rapidly dropped to zero after the fourth year.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Serial pulmonary homograft peak gradients over time for 25 patients with peak gradients >=30 mm Hg.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating cumulative probability of freedom from (A) any stenosis (peak gradient >=30 mm Hg) and (B) reoperation.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Instantaneous hazard function curve for developing any pulmonary homograft stenosis (peak gradient >=30 mm Hg).

Reoperations for Pulmonary Stenosis
In the present series, 4 patients underwent reoperation for dysfunction of the pulmonary homograft. In all 4 patients, the indication for reoperation was the rapid development of pulmonary homograft stenosis, with high gradient documented at between 6 and 12 months after surgery. Pulmonary valve re-replacement was necessary at between 12 and 18 months after the original operation. Extensive and prolonged microbiological cultures for bacteria, fungi, and viruses were negative in all 4 patients. The operative findings and histological features of the explanted homografts (Figure 4) were remarkably similar in all 4 cases. At operation, extensive granulomatous tissue was seen encircling the homograft and causing extrinsic compression. Histologically, there was minimal to mild neointimal proliferation and a pronounced chronic adventitial inflammatory fibrotic reaction, with a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate.



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Typical histology from explanted pulmonary homograft demonstrating (A) marked chronic inflammatory reaction in adventitia (Å) and neointimal hyperplasia (n) and (B) a fibrotic perivascular chronic inflammatory infiltrate in adventitia. M indicates media.

MRI of Patients With Pulmonary Stenosis
MRI allowed good visualization of all 15 stenosed homografts (peak gradient >=30 mm Hg) studied. Proximal and distal suture lines could usually be identified on cine images as slightly darker regions in the wall, and the point of valve closure could be identified. The narrowing was mainly due to reduction in lumen diameter in the tubular part of the homograft in 10 cases. It was mainly at the distal suture line in 4 cases and mainly due to homograft valvar stenosis in only 1 case. Spin echo appearances in 11 of the 15 cases suggested the presence of regions of nonfat tissue >=8 mm in thickness adjacent to stenosed homografts. Mean minimum diameter and peak velocity by MRI were 11±2 mm and 3.2±0.7 m/s, respectively. An example is shown in Figure 5, together with the early postoperative image acquired in this case. In both of the patients who had undergone early postoperative MRI, the later study appeared to show reduction in homograft length by {approx}40%, as well as reduction in luminal diameter.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Magnetic resonance images in single patient. A, Oblique sagittal gradient echo image 14 days after surgery. Arrows indicate location of proximal and distal suture lines of homograft. B, Oblique sagittal gradient echo image acquired 3 years later in same patient; arrows indicate reduction in length and width of homograft. C, Transaxial spin echo image acquired at same time as B. Arrows indicate signal from tissue adjacent to homograft stenosis.

Functional Significance of Pulmonary Stenosis
All 25 patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. One patient had right bundle-branch block on his ECG, and 1 had electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy. However, in the 15 patients who underwent MRI, at least mild RV hypertrophy was assessed to be present in all 15, with moderate hypertrophy in 8.

Determinants of Pulmonary Homograft Stenosis
The Table details the patient demographics and potential determinants of homograft dysfunction for the entire patient group, as well as for those with pulmonary stenosis (including those who subsequently underwent reoperation). No significant differences between the groups were seen. Multiple logistic regression with patient-, homograft-, and operation-related determinants as end points did not identify any significant determinants. There was no correlation between homograft stenosis and the presence of positive panel reactive antibodies to a wide range of HLA antigens.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study serves to document the changes in pulmonary homograft function during the first 7 years after the Ross operation.

Reoperation for Pulmonary Homograft Stenosis
In the present series, all reoperations were due to rapidly progressive stenosis of the pulmonary homograft, and reoperation was necessary within 18 months of the original operation. This scenario has been described previously in both the adult and pediatric populations.79 In all 4 cases in the present study, there was a pronounced adventitial reaction that produced extrinsic compression, and this was associated with histology that was suggestive of inflammatory-mediated fibrotic reaction. In all 4 cases, there was no significant calcification or change in the homograft wall, and the cusps were unaffected. Unlike other reports, we could not identify any factors that could predict homograft dysfunction or reoperation. In patients with less severe or more slowly progressive stenosis, stenting has been suggested as a possible option. One such patient in our series has recently undergone primary stenting of the pulmonary homograft with excellent early hemodynamic results. The efficacy and safety of this procedure in this group of patients, however, is still to be clarified.

Echocardiographic Pulmonary Stenosis
At 7 years of follow-up, a total of 17% of patients in our series had developed peak pulmonary homograft gradients >=30 mm Hg. This is in contrast to the low reoperation rates. This is due in part to our end point being the development of any pulmonary stenosis (defined as a peak gradient at any time point >=30 mm Hg), which was chosen to illustrate the entire spectrum of dysfunction. Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate that in the majority of patients who develop stenosis, this becomes clinically apparent within 2 years of surgery, there being no new cases of stenosis detected after the fourth year of follow-up. To investigate this further, 15 of the 21 patients with echocardiographic gradients between 30 and 60 mm Hg underwent MRI. This produced clear pictures of the location of the narrowing, which demonstrated that in 10 of the 15 patients we studied, the narrowing was due to a reduction of the lumen of the tubular part of the homograft. We do not have a matched control group, but in the 2 patients studied early after operation by MRI and in 5 additional patients 1 to 4 years after Ross operation who were scanned for other clinical indications, there was no evidence of significant homograft narrowing, and minimum homograft lumen diameter was 17 to 26 mm. Eleven of the 15 stenosed homografts had MRI evidence of excess tissue around the homograft compatible with an adventitial reaction producing extrinsic compression in the manner of those undergoing reoperation. In the 2 patients who had early postoperative as well as later MRI, reduction in homograft length and diameter would be compatible with tissue shrinkage and/or compression.

Mechanism of Pulmonary Homograft Dysfunction
For reconstruction of the RVOT, pulmonary homografts appear to have advantages over aortic homografts,10 and in the present series, all patients received pulmonary homografts. The operative findings and histology in combination with the magnetic resonance images suggest that the underlying mechanism in our patients was predominantly inflammatory in nature. Unlike other series,9 in our patients, this was manifested solely as progressive stenosis rather than regurgitation. Raised early postoperative pulmonary homograft velocities and degeneration have been reported previously,11,12 as well as an inflammatory mechanism suggested from raised temperatures postoperatively and from postmortem studies.13,14 The present study supports these findings and extends them by demonstrating that this mechanism appears to be the main cause in a patient population that encompasses the entire spectrum of surgical practice.3 The cause of the inflammatory cell proliferation is unclear. Although microbiological cultures were consistently negative, occult chronic infection or a chronic mediastinitis,15 possibly as a reaction to the homograft, cannot be excluded. The reaction may be immunologically mediated7,12 in a manner similar to that seen in chronic rejection. This would be supported by the chronic lymphocytic infiltrate; however, the lack of histological changes in the homograft wall and the excessive mediastinal fibrotic reaction do not support this putative mechanism. Indeed, in the present series, panel reactive antibodies were noncontributory. Alternatively, early postoperative stretching and lengthening of the homograft may cause the release of tissue factors responsible for the reaction. Multivariate analysis did not show any potential determinants of stenosis; in particular, there were no differences in patients receiving fresh or cryopreserved homografts. Whether the newer generation of artificial conduits, those developed from the pulmonary arterial wall, or even tissue-engineered valves will produce a lower incidence of inflammatory stenosis remains to be seen. The present study describes and characterizes an inflammatory reaction around the pulmonary homograft, but we did not investigate further any of the above hypotheses. Additional studies are necessary to determine the underlying mechanism.

Significance of Pulmonary Homograft Stenosis
The clinical significance of mild increases in pulmonary homograft velocities is debatable; as expected, the velocities obtained by MRI were lower because of the ability to map velocity in the middle of the stenotic jet and avoid any aliasing effect. All 15 patients who underwent MRI were in New York Heart Association class I or II. However, the presence of right ventricular hypertrophy in all the patients suggests that this level of obstruction may have functional significance over a longer period of time.

Conclusions
In the present study, we have demonstrated that in patients who undergo the Ross procedure, evolving pulmonary homograft stenosis is an uncommon but clinically important problem. Despite this, the mortality, morbidity, and freedom from reoperation figures for pulmonary autograft surgery, both in the present series and in others, compare favorably with those for other valve substitutes. The early development and clinical progression, magnetic resonance images, and histology of the explanted homografts suggest that the predominant mechanism is inflammatory, although the precise mechanism is unclear. The present study, therefore, has implications regarding the monitoring of patients after the Ross operation, from both a clinical and a research point of view. We have highlighted the fact that follow-up of pulmonary homograft function is critically important in the first 2 years after surgery, and where possible, those with echocardiographic gradients should undergo MRI. In addition, the present study raises the possibility that in the future, immune modulation may further improve clinical results for patients undergoing this operation. For example, patients with early pulmonary homograft stenosis and evidence of extrinsic compression may benefit from prophylactic anti-inflammatory treatment.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Carr-White is a British Heart Foundation Junior Research Fellow. Dr Yacoub is a British Heart Foundation Professor of Cardiac Surgery. Many thanks to Dr Mary Shepphard for histological pictures and expert advice.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Elkins RC. Pulmonary autograft: the optimal substitute for the aortic valve? N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 59–60.[Free Full Text]
  2. Elkins RC, Knott-Craig CJ, Ward KE, et al. Pulmonary autograft in children: realized growth potential. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 57: 1387–1393; discussion 1393–1394.[Abstract]
  3. Aklog L, Carr-White GS, Birks EJ, et al. Pulmonary autograft versus aortic homograft for aortic valve replacement: interim results from a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000; 9: 176–188; discussion 188–189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Chambers JC, Somerville J, Stone S, et al. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2206–2214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Santini F, Dyke C, Edwards S, et al. Pulmonary autograft versus homograft replacement of the aortic valve: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997; 113: 894–899; discussion 899–900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Martinez JE, Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ, et al. Obstruction in extracardiac ventriculopulmonary conduits: value of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with velocity mapping and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 338–344.[Abstract]
  7. Baskett RJ, Ross DB, Nanton MA, et al. Factors in the early failure of cryopreserved homograft pulmonary valves in children: preserved immunogenicity? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 112: 1170–1178; discussion 1178–1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chan KC, Fyfe DA, McKay CA, et al. Right ventricular outflow reconstruction with cryopreserved homografts in pediatric patients: intermediate-term follow-up with serial echocardiographic assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 483–489.[Abstract]
  9. Ward KE, Elkins RC, Overholt ED, et al. Evaluation of cryopreserved homografts in the right ventricular outflow tract after the Ross procedure: intermediate-term follow up. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997; 6: 130–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bando K, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, et al. Outcome of pulmonary and aortic homografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 109: 509–517; discussion 517–518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Moidl R, Simon P, Kupilik N, et al. Increased pulmonary flow velocities in oversized homografts in patients after the Ross procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997; 12: 569–572; discussion 573.[Abstract]
  12. Elkins RC, Lane MM, McCue C. Pulmonary autograft reoperation: incidence and management. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 62: 450–455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Goffin YA, Narine KR, Alexander JP, et al. Histopathologic comparison of a pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft in a patient 17 months after a Ross procedure: an autopsy study. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998; 7: 327–330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Naegele H, Bohlmann M, Doring V, et al. Results of aortic valve replacement with pulmonary and aortic homografts. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000; 9: 215–220; discussion 220–221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Yacoub MH, Thompson VC. Chronic idiopathic pulmonary hilar fibrosis: a clinicopathological entity. Thorax. 1971; 26: 365–375.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carr-White, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yacoub, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carr-White, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yacoub, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease