(Circulation. 2001;104:856.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
-Radiation Therapy for Preventing Recurrence in Very Long, Diffuse, In-Stent Restenosis Lesions
From the Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (G.S.M.).
Correspondence to Neil J. Weissman, MD, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Suite 4B1, Washington, DC 20010. E-mail njw1{at}mhg.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-irradiation in preventing recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) is well established. However, brachytherapy may be less effective in very long, diffuse ISR lesions.
Methods and Results We used serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to study patients with long, diffuse ISR lesions (length, 36 to 80 mm) who were enrolled in (1) Long WRIST (Washington Radiation In-Stent Restenosis Trial), a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intracoronary
-irradiation (15 Gy at 2 mm from the source) and (2) high-dose (HD) Long WRIST, a registry that used a dose prescription of 18 Gy at 2 mm from the source. IVUS was performed using automated pullback (0.5 mm/s). Stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia were measured at 2-mm intervals. Complete postintervention and follow-up IVUS imaging was available in 30 irradiated and 34 placebo patients from Long WRIST and in 25 patients from HD Long WRIST. Stent length was longer in HD Long WRIST than in placebo or treated patients in Long WRIST (P=0.0064 and P=0.0125, respectively). Otherwise, baseline measurements were similar. At follow-up, the minimum lumen area was largest in the HD Long WRIST patients (4.0±1.4 mm2); areas were 2.9±1.0 mm2 in irradiated patients in Long WRIST and 1.9±1.1 mm2 in placebo patients in Long WRIST (P<0.005 for all comparisons).
Conclusions Serial IVUS analysis shows that
-irradiation reduces recurrent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in long, diffuse ISR lesions; however, it is even more effective when given at a higher dose.
Key Words: ultrasonics restenosis radiotherapy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-radiation (192Ir) in preventing recurrence after treatment for diffuse ISR. | Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-irradiation (15 Gy at 2 mm from the source; it included 60 irradiated and 61 placebo patients) and (2) high-dose (HD) Long WRIST, a registry that used a dose prescription of 18 Gy at 2 mm from the source (120 patients). Primary interventional techniques, which included rotational atherectomy (SCIMED/Boston Scientific Corporation), excimer laser coronary angioplasty (Spectranetics), additional stent implantation, balloon angioplasty, or a combination of the above, were first performed at the discretion of the operator. After primary treatment, a 5-French, closed-end, noncentering catheter was used to deliver the 192Ir at the prescribed doses in both trials. Seed trains were 14 to 23 in number and covered a length of 55 to 91 mm. The dwell time averaged 20.0±3.3 minutes for Long WRIST and 25.6±3.8 minutes for HD Long WRIST (P=0.0001).
IVUS Imaging and Analysis
IVUS imaging was performed after the administration of 200 µg of intracoronary nitroglycerine using a single element (30 or 40 MHz), mechanically rotating transducer (SCIMED/Boston Scientific Corporation) and automated pullback (0.5 mm/s). Stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH; stent minus lumen) and cross-sectional areas (CSA) were measured using computerized planimetry (Tape Measure, Indec Systems) according to standard protocols. Measurements were made every 2 mm of the stented length. Stent, lumen, and IH volumes were calculated using Simpsons rule and normalized for stent length. These methods have been used extensively to analyze ISR, including the results of brachytherapy treatment.611 Complete postintervention and follow-up IVUS imaging was available in 30 irradiated and 34 placebo patients with from Long WRIST and in 25 patients from HD Long WRIST.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Statview 4.5 (SAS Institute). Categorical variables are presented as frequencies, with comparison using
2 statistics. Continuous variables are presented as mean±1SD and are compared using factorial ANOVA with post-hoc analysis using the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, in which P<0.0125 is required for significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Mean Planar IVUS Measurements
Stent length was longer in HD Long WRIST than in placebo or treated patients in Long WRIST (P=0.0064 an P=0.0125, respectively). For this reason, volumes were normalized for stent length, and mean planar results are reported in Table 2.
|
Baseline measurements were similar in all 3 groups. At follow-up, mean lumen CSA was smaller in placebo than in Long WRIST or HD Long WRIST lesions (P=0.0019 and P<0.0001, respectively). Similarly, mean IH CSA was greater in placebo than in Long WRIST or HD Long WRIST patients (P=0.0011 and P=0.0003, respectively).
Minimum Lumen and Maximum IH Measurements
Baseline minimum lumen CSA was similar in all 3 groups. However, the follow-up minimum lumen CSA was smaller in placebo patients than in Long WRIST or HD Long WRIST patients (P=0.002 and P<0.0001, respectively), and the follow-up minimum lumen CSA was significantly smaller in Long WRIST compared with HD Long WRIST patients (P=0.0004).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ISR presents in various angiographic patterns. Mehran et al4 classified ISR into focal (<10 mm in length), diffuse intra-stent (>10 mm confined to the stented segment), proliferative (>10 mm in length extending into contiguous reference segments), and total occlusions. Clinical recurrence increased from 19% to 35% to 50% to 83% according to this classification. These findings were confirmed in a report by Bossi et al.12 The factors responsible for diffuse ISR and its high recurrence rate are not known. However, some studies have suggested that smaller stent size and genetic factors may be responsible for this phenomenon.9,10,13 Smaller arteries with smaller stent sizes would have less tolerance for neointimal hyperplasia reaccumulation.
Efficacy of Brachytherapy in Diffuse ISR
Similarly, the reasons for the reduced efficacy of brachytherapy in diffuse ISR are not well understood. One possibility is that longer lesions have more aggressive neointimal proliferation. However, a subset analysis from SCRIPPS indicated that brachytherapy is more efficacious in diabetics,14 and diabetics are known to have more aggressive ISR and more in-stent IH than nondiabetics.15
A previous report from our laboratory offered an alternative explanation.9 Longer ISR lesions were associated with longer maximum source-to-target distances. Because source-to-target distances determine the dose delivered to the adventitia, focal areas within longer ISR lesions seemed to receive a lower dose. This resulted in more IH and a smaller follow-up minimum lumen CSA in the longer lesions. These findings support the importance of careful dosimetry, particularly in very long, diffuse ISR lesions. To be effective, a minimum dose must be delivered to the adventitia.16 The current serial IVUS analysis showed that the higher prescribed dose proved more effective, as reflected by a smaller increase in maximum IH CSA and a larger follow-up minimum lumen CSA; this occurred despite longer ISR lengths in the HD group. Centering the source within the lumen might also improve the dose delivered to the adventitia.9
Limitations
Follow-up was limited to 6 months. The current findings only apply to
-irradiation in the doses described, and the actual dose delivered to the adventitia was not calculated. Because of the lengths of the lesions, imaging of adjacent reference segments could not be performed routinely; therefore, edge effects could not be analyzed. Not all patients had serial IVUS imaging; in particular, 7 irradiated and 5 placebo patients in Long WRIST (10% of the total cohort) and 8 patients in HD Long WRIST (7% of the total cohort) had total occlusions at follow-up. Different interventional devices were used in each of the 3 groups.
Although patients in Long WRIST were randomized to placebo versus irradiation, HD Long WRIST was a registry. However, HD Long WRIST patients were similar to those in the other 2 groups.
Conclusions
Serial IVUS analysis showed that
-irradiation reduces recurrent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, even in long, diffuse ISR lesions. However, it is even more effective when given at a higher dose.
Received April 18, 2001; revision received June 21, 2001; accepted June 22, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Duerman HL, Baim DS, Cutlip DE, et al. Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 277284.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Lee SG, Lee CW, Cheong SS, et al. Immediate and long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty alone for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 140143.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implication for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999; 100: 18721878.
5. Remiers B, Moussa I, Akiyama T, et al. Long-term clinical follow-up after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 186192.[Abstract]
6.
Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. A double blind randomized trial of catheter-based radiotherapy to inhibit restenosis following coronary stenting. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 16971703.
7.
Waksman R, White L, Chan R, et al. Intracoronary radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibit recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2000; 101: 21652171.
8.
Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, Teirstein PS, et al. Effect of intracoro-nary
-radiation therapy on in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound analysis from the Gamma-1 Study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 29152918.
9.
Ahmed JM, Mintz GS, Waksman R, et al. Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of the impact of lesion length on the efficacy of intracoronary
-irradiation for preventing recurrent in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2001; 103: 188191.
10. Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 720724.[Abstract]
11.
Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996; 94: 12471254.
12.
Bossi I, Klersy C, Black AJ, et al. In-stent restenosis: long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 15691576.
13.
Amant C, Bauters C, Bodart JC, et al. Dallele of angiotensin I-converting enzyme is a major risk factor for restenosis after coronary stenting. Circulation. 1997; 96: 5660.
14. Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. A subgroup analysis of the Scripps Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Proliferation Post Stenting Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 42: 10971104.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Kornowski R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, et al. Increased restenosis in diabetes mellitus after coronary interventions is due to exaggerated intimal hyperplasia: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1997; 95: 13661369.
16.
Sabate M, Marijnissen JP, Carlier SG, et al. Residual plaque burden, delivered dose, and tissue composition predict 6-month outcome after balloon angioplasty and ß-radiation therapy. Circulation. 2000; 101: 24722477.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Thys Clinical Competence in Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2003; 97(2): 313 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Waksman, E. Cheneau, A. E. Ajani, R. L. White, E. Pinnow, R. Torguson, R. Deible, L. F. Satler, A. D. Pichard, K. M. Kent, et al. Intracoronary Radiation Therapy Improves the Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Diffuse In-Stent Restenotic Lesions: Results of the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial for Long Lesions (Long WRIST) Studies Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107(13): 1744 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Quinones, P. S. Douglas, E. Foster, J. Gorcsan III, J. F. Lewis, A. S. Pearlman, J. Rychik, E. E. Salcedo, J. B. Seward, J. G. Stevenson, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Echocardiography: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians--American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1068 - 1089. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Ajani, R. Waksman, E. Cheneau, D.-H. Cha, S. McGlynn, M. Castagna, R. C. Chan, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, A. D. Pichard, et al. The outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with In-Stentrestenosis who failed intracoronary radiation therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 551 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Quinones, P. S. Douglas, E. Foster, J. Gorcsan III, J. F. Lewis, A. S. Pearlman, J. Rychik, E. E. Salcedo, J. B. Seward, J. G. Stevenson, et al. ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on echocardiography : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence Developed in Collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and the Society of Pediatric Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 687 - 708. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Spanos, G. Stankovic, J. Tobis, and A. Colombo The challenge of in-stent restenosis: insights from intravascular ultrasound Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2003; 24(2): 138 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |