(Circulation. 2001;104:380.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (Y.H., P.G.Y, S.H.S, P.J.F.); Heart Center Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany (E.G.); and Diagnostic Institute and Swiss Medical Clinic, Buenos Aires, Argentina (L.M.d.l.F.).
Correspondence to Peter J. Fitzgerald, MD, PhD, Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H3554, Stanford, CA 94305-5637. E-mail peter_fitzgerald{at}cvmed.stanford.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Serial IVUS analyses (immediately after intervention and at follow-up at 8.3 months) were performed in 15 native coronary lesions treated with the QuaDS-QP2 stent. IVUS measurements were performed at 8 cross-sections in each target segment (4 cross-sections within the stent and 2 cross-sections in each reference segment). At baseline, no significant plaque protrusion or thrombus was detected in the target segment. Mild incomplete stent apposition and edge dissection were observed in one and two cases, respectively. Percent expansion of the stent (minimum stent area/average reference lumen area) was 96.0±21.7%. At follow-up, mean neointimal area within the stent was 1.2±1.3 mm2, and mean cross-sectional narrowing (neointimal area/stent area) was 13.6±14.9%. At the vessel segments immediately adjacent to the stent, a significant increase in plaque area (1.9±2.6 mm2, P=0.001) was observed, but vessel area remained unchanged. However, no patients showed clinically significant in-stent or edge restenosis (diameter stenosis
50%) during the follow-up period.
Conclusions The first human experience with the new drug-delivery stent showed a minimal amount of neointimal proliferation in the stented segment. Late lumen loss at the reference sites adjacent to the stent was acceptable and predominantly due to plaque proliferation.
Key Words: coronary disease drugs stents restenosis ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preclinical studies have shown that local administration of paclitaxel (Taxol), a microtubular inhibitor, or its analogues significantly reduces smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation for months after balloon angioplasty or stenting.5 However, the effect of this agent on the diseased human coronaries and the influence of the long-term stimulus from the drug-eluting stent on the adjacent vessel wall remain unknown.
The aims of this pilot study were to use serial (after intervention and at follow-up) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging (1) to evaluate the long-term effect of stent-based 7-hexanolytaxol (QP2, a taxane analogue) delivery on neointimal tissue growth within stents and (2) to characterize the vessel and plaque changes in the adjacent coronary artery segments.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Procedure
All patients were premedicated with aspirin (325 mg/d) and received heparin (100 U/kg) before the procedures. After predilatation of the target lesion, stents were deployed using a standard implantation technique guided by IVUS. Postdeployment high-pressure dilatation was allowed, with balloon selection and inflation pressure at the discretion of the individual operator. After stent implantation, aspirin was continued indefinitely and ticlopidine (500 mg/d) was prescribed for 30 days in all cases.
Angiographic and IVUS Analyses
Serial angiography and IVUS imaging were performed after intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin (200 µg) immediately after the procedure and at follow-up. All cineangiograms and IVUS images were independently analyzed by the Stanford University Cardiovascular Core Analysis Laboratory.
Qualitative IVUS parameters assessed in the study included stent apposition (incomplete apposition being defined as
1 strut clearly separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckle behind the strut) and edge tears (defined as disruptions of plaque immediately adjacent to the stent ends where the flap could be clearly differentiated from the underlying plaque).
Quantitative IVUS measurements were performed at 8 cross-sections in each target segment (4 cross-sections within the stent and 2 cross-sections in each reference segment) as follows: the tightest cross-sections within the stent at baseline and at follow-up, the proximal and the distal stent edges (the stent segments within 1 mm of the proximal and distal stent ends), the proximal and distal peri-stent margins (the reference segments immediately adjacent to the proximal and distal stent ends), and the proximal and distal reference sites. Cross-sectional narrowing was calculated as neointimal area divided by stent area. Validation of qualitative and quantitative assessment by IVUS has been reported previously.6
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using StatView 5.0. Quantitative data are presented as mean±SD and were compared using a 2-tailed, paired ttest or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Stented Segments
At baseline, no significant plaque protrusion or thrombus was detected in the stented segment. Mild incomplete stent apposition and edge tear were observed in one and two cases, respectively. Percent expansion of the stent (minimum stent area/average reference lumen area) was 96±22%. At follow-up, mean neointimal area within the stent was 1.2±1.3 mm2, and mean cross-sectional narrowing (neointimal area/stent area) was 13.6±14.9%. Serial changes in quantitative IVUS parameters are shown in Table 2.
Peri-Stent Margins
During the follow-up period, plaque area in the peri-stent margins increased significantly, from 8.7±2.2 mm2 to 10.7±3.0 mm2 (P<0.05) and from 7.5±3.7 mm2 to 9.4±4.2 mm2 (P<0.05) for the proximal and distal margins, respectively (Figure 2). No significant change in vessel area was observed in either the proximal or the distal margins. Consequently, late lumen loss at the peri-stent margins was 1.3±2.6 mm2 (P=0.09) for the proximal margin and 1.4±2.2 mm2 (P<0.05) for the distal margin. The proximal and the distal reference sites showed no significant change in vessel, plaque, or lumen area.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50%) during the follow-up period. Previous IVUS studies have reported that mean cross-sectional narrowing after conventional bare-metal stent implantation ranges from 20% to 48%.2,7 The lesser amount of neointima observed in the present study (13.6%) was comparable to the numbers reported for radioactive stents (7.4% to 16.7%)8 and sirolimus-coated stents (10.4% to 11.0%).4 Importantly, animal studies have demonstrated that the histological characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting stents are similar to those after intracoronary radiation therapy in several aspects,3,9 which raises the concern of potentially increased late thrombosis rates and lumen narrowing in the vessel segments adjacent to the drug-eluting stent. In this initial experience with the QP2-eluting stent, however, late thrombotic events were not observed, although clinical trials with a larger study population will be required to confirm this preliminary result.
After radioactive stent implantation, the mechanism responsible for the accelerated restenosis at the stent margins is a combination of tissue growth and negative vessel remodeling,1 presumably due to radiation dose fall-off coupled with balloon injury during stent deployment. In theory, drug dose fall-off and the long-term stimulus from polymer materials in drug-eluting stents may also potentially provoke sustained inflammation at the unscaffolded, balloon-injured, peri-stent vessel segments.10 In this preliminary study, however, the degree of late lumen loss at the peri-stent margins of the QP2-eluting stent was similar to the numbers reported for conventional bare-metal stents.6 This phenomenon resulted primarily from tissue growth, with no significant vessel shrinkage or local dilatation. Considering the striking anti-proliferative effect of drug-eluting stents in the stented segment, aggressive postdeployment dilatation with high pressures may no longer be necessary, thereby minimizing vessel wall injury and subsequent neointimal proliferation at stent margins. Further investigation will be needed to determine the appropriate vessel and/or lesion subset and optimal implantation technique for this particular type of stent.
Study Limitations
First, this study is based on a registry of a small, select patient population, raising the possibility of selection bias and low statistical power. Second, automated pullback was not used in all cases. To circumvent this limitation, quantitative IVUS analysis was performed with a semivolumetric technique. Finally, longer follow-up periods might be necessary for drug-eluting stents than for conventional metal stents, as has been suggested for intracoronary radiation therapy.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 21, 2001; revision received June 1, 2001; accepted June 5, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Costa MA, Sabat M, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Late coronary occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy. Circulation. 1999; 100: 789792.
3.
Drachman DE, Edelman ER, Seifert P, et al. Neointimal thickening after stent delivery of paclitaxel: change in composition and arrest of growth over six months. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 23252332.
4.
Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 192195.
5.
Axel DI, Kunert W, Goggelmann C, et al. Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery. Circulation. 1997; 96: 636645.
6.
Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996; 94: 12471254.
7. Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 720724.[Abstract]
8.
Kay IP, Sabate M, Costa MA, et al. Positive geometric vascular remodeling is seen after catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation but not after radioactive stent implantation. Circulation. 2000; 102: 14341439.
9.
Waksman R, Rodriguez JC, Robinson KA, et al. Effect of intravascular irradiation on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and vascular remodeling after balloon overstretch injury of porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1997; 96: 19441952.
10.
van der Giessen WJ, Lincoff AM, Schwartz RS, et al. Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996; 94: 16901697.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C Roiron, P Sanchez, A Bouzamondo, P Lechat, and G Montalescot Drug eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 641 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Raja Drug-Eluting Stents and the Future of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Facts and Fiction Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 1162 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Lee, H.-C. Tan, and Y.-T. Lim Update on Drug-Eluting Stents for Prevention of Restenosis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, February 1, 2006; 14(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ako, Y. Morino, Y. Honda, A. Hassan, S. Sonoda, P. G. Yock, M. B. Leon, J. W. Moses, H. N. Bonneau, and P. J. Fitzgerald Late Incomplete Stent Apposition After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 20, 2005; 46(6): 1002 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wei, B. Zheng-zhong, W. Yong-jie, Z. Qing-wu, and M. Ya-lin Bioeffects of Low-Frequency Ultrasonic Gene Delivery and Safety on Cell Membrane Permeability Control J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1569 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vogt, A. Stein, G. Rettemeier, N. Krott, R. Hoffmann, J. v. Dahl, A.-K. Bosserhoff, W. Michaeli, P. Hanrath, C. Weber, et al. Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1330 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, M. E. Russell, G. Guagliumi, J. Webb, J. Hamburger, W. Rutsch, C. Kaiser, R. Whitbourn, et al. Vascular Responses at Proximal and Distal Edges of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis From the TAXUS II Trial Circulation, February 10, 2004; 109(5): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Bhatia, R Bhatia, and M Dhindsa Drug-eluting stents: new era and new concerns Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 80(939): 13 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Sousa, P. W. Serruys, and M. A. Costa New Frontiers in Cardiology: Drug-Eluting Stents: Part II Circulation, May 13, 2003; 107(18): 2383 - 2389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B E Bouma, G J Tearney, H Yabushita, M Shishkov, C R Kauffman, D DeJoseph Gauthier, B D MacNeill, S L Houser, H T Aretz, E F Halpern, et al. Evaluation of intracoronary stenting by intravascular optical coherence tomography Heart, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 317 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Spanos, G. Stankovic, J. Tobis, and A. Colombo The challenge of in-stent restenosis: insights from intravascular ultrasound Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2003; 24(2): 138 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Babapulle and M. J. Eisenberg Coated Stents for the Prevention of Restenosis: Part II Circulation, November 26, 2002; 106(22): 2859 - 2866. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Virmani, F. Liistro, G. Stankovic, C. Di Mario, M. Montorfano, A. Farb, F. D. Kolodgie, and A. Colombo Mechanism of Late In-Stent Restenosis After Implantation of a Paclitaxel Derivate-Eluting Polymer Stent System in Humans Circulation, November 19, 2002; 106(21): 2649 - 2651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kataoka, E. Grube, Y. Honda, Y. Morino, S.-H. Hur, H. N. Bonneau, A. Colombo, C. Di Mario, G. Guagliumi, K. E. Hauptmann, et al. 7-Hexanoyltaxol-Eluting Stent for Prevention of Neointimal Growth: An Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis From the Study to COmpare REstenosis rate between QueST and QuaDS-QP2 (SCORE) Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1788 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, A. Abizaid, J. E. Sousa, A. Colombo, G. Guagliumi, W. Wijns, W. K. Lindeboom, J. Ligthart, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound Findings in the Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind RAVEL (RAndomized study with the sirolimus-eluting VElocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery Lesions) Trial Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 798 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Lowe, S. N. Oesterle, and L. M. Khachigian Coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 183 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Regar, G Sianos, and P W Serruys Stent development and local drug delivery Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 227 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Liistro, G. Stankovic, C. Di Mario, T. Takagi, A. Chieffo, S. Moshiri, M. Montorfano, M. Carlino, C. Briguori, P. Pagnotta, et al. First Clinical Experience With a Paclitaxel Derivate-Eluting Polymer Stent System Implantation for In-Stent Restenosis: Immediate and Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcome Circulation, April 23, 2002; 105(16): 1883 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |