| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;104:131.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Departments of Surgery (M.J.D., J.M.J., S.M.E., J.J., W.J.K., C.A.M.), Medicine, and Biochemistry (K.H.W.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Correspondence to Carmelo A. Milano, MD, Department of Surgery, Box 3043, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail david015{at}mc.duke.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Neonatal piglets (3 kg) underwent a median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, followed by aortic cross-clamping with 30 minutes of cardioplegic arrest. Adenoviral vectors containing transgenes for either ß-galactosidase (adeno-ß-gal, n=11) or the human ß2-adrenergic receptor (adeno-ß2-AR, n=15) were administered through the cardioplegia cannula immediately after arrest and were allowed to dwell in the coronary circulation during the cross-clamp period. After 1 week, the animals were killed, and their heart, lungs, and liver were excised and examined for gene expression. Analysis of ß-galactosidase staining revealed transmural myocardial gene expression among animals receiving adeno-ß-gal. No marker gene expression was detected in liver or lung tissue. ß-AR density in the left ventricle after adeno-ß2-AR delivery was 396±85% of levels in control animals (P<0.01). Animals receiving adeno-ß2-AR and control animals demonstrated similar ß-AR density in both the liver (114±8% versus 100±9%, P=NS) and lung (114±7% versus 100±9%, P=NS). There was no evidence of cardiac inflammation.
Conclusions By using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest, intracoronary delivery of adenoviral vectors resulted in efficient myocardial uptake and expression. Undetectable transgene expression in liver or lung tissue suggests cardiac-selective expression.
Key Words: gene therapy cardiopulmonary bypass signal transduction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We hypothesized that cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may facilitate cardiac-selective gene transfer using recombinant replication-deficient adenovirus. CPB with aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest represent the fundamental components of many cardiac surgery procedures and uniquely isolate the coronary circulation. Administration of an adenoviral vector under these conditions maximizes contact time with the myocardium and may reduce systemic delivery, therefore limiting toxicity and offering a clinically relevant delivery system.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One-week-old piglets (3 kg) received humane care in compliance with the institutional committee on animal research and in accordance with the regulations adopted by the National Institutes of Health. Animals were given ketamine (20 mg/kg IM) just before inhaled isoflurane (1%) anesthesia.5 A median sternotomy was performed, and after systemic heparinization, CPB was established via an aortic cannula and a right atrial cannula. The CPB circuit consisted of a reservoir, a hollow fiber oxygenator/heat exchanger, and a roller pump. After stabilization, the aorta was cross-clamped and the heart arrested by infusion of cold (4°C), hyperkalemic cardioplegia solution (30 mL/kg) into the aortic root. Animals were randomized to receive either adeno-ß2-AR or adeno-ß-gal. Immediately after cardioplegic arrest, 1x1011 total viral particles, reconstituted in 8 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), were injected into the aortic root and allowed to dwell in the myocardium. After 30 minutes of cardiac arrest, the cross-clamp was removed and the heart was reperfused. The animals were then weaned off CPB and allowed to recover.
Gene expression was assessed 1 week after delivery. A subset of animals (n=8) was studied at 4, 8, and 24 hours and 14 days after gene delivery to examine the time course of expression. Heart, liver, and lung tissues were either immediately stained with X-gal solution [2 mmol/L K4Fe(CN)6, 2 mmol/L K3Fe(CN)6, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.5 mg/mL 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside] as whole-mount samples or frozen at -80°C, sectioned at 10 µm, and stained in X-gal as previously described.6 ß-AR expression was quantified with radioligand binding assays to determine total ß-AR density. Tissue samples were homogenized in lysis buffer (5 mmol/L Tris-HCl ]pH 7.4] and 5 mmol/L EDTA), and membrane fractions were extracted. A radioligand binding assay was performed using 125I-cyanopindolol to determine total ß-AR density, as previously described.7
A subgroup of animals received only PBS during CPB (n=4). Standard hematoxylin and eosin histological sections of these hearts were made and compared with sections from hearts treated with adeno-ß2-AR to assess any inflammatory response.
Data are expressed as mean±SEM and were assessed by Students t test. Significance was assumed at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Animals treated with adeno-ß2-AR exhibited a left ventricular ß-AR density
4-fold higher than those receiving marker transgene (P<0.01; Table). The right ventricular ß-AR density was 1.6-fold higher than that of control animals, demonstrating lower but significant transgene expression in this chamber (P=0.01). ß-AR density was not different in the liver and lung between adeno-ß2-AR and adeno-ß-gal-treated animals (Table).
|
In addition, gene expression was studied at varying intervals from time of delivery (Figure, D). ß-Galactosidase expression was first detected 8 hours after gene delivery. Expression at 8 hours was transmural and comparable to that seen at 24 hours and at 1 week. At 2 weeks, an additional 4 animals treated with adeno-ß2-AR had increased left ventricular (275±126 fmol/mg) and right ventricular (181±31 fmol/mg) ß-AR density.
Hematoxylin and eosin micrographs of hearts 1 week after delivery of adeno-ß2-AR or PBS (n=4) are shown in the Figure (panels E and F, respectively). There was no evidence of an inflammatory response in either group.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because the coronary circulation is uniquely isolated during CPB, gene delivery to the myocardium may be improved relative to injection into the coronary circulation with the heart beating. By using CPB and cardioplegic arrest, the virus is allowed to dwell in the coronary circulation for 30 minutes. At the end of this time, in contrast to beating-heart delivery, a higher percentage of viral particles may be taken up by myocytes or be inactivated. Furthermore, any remaining viable virus is ultimately washed out of the coronary circulation via the coronary sinus and returned to the CPB apparatus. Because the CPB circuit has a high surface area for potential virus-binding, particularly at the membrane oxygenator, the remaining viable virus may become bound. Indeed, Marshall et al8 demonstrated that the replication-deficient adenoviral vectors commonly used for gene delivery are rapidly inactivated on exposure to nonbiological surfaces such as polycarbonate, cardiac catheters, and syringes.
This approach may have multiple applications to clinical cardiac surgery. Such genetic treatments might support end-stage heart failure patients in a manner similar to left ventricular assist devices, as a bridge of support until heart transplantation. It may also provide support for high-risk patients with severely reduced ventricular function undergoing revascularization or valve replacement procedures. Indeed, impairment of the myocardial ß-AR system during cardiac surgery has been documented, including receptor desensitization with reduced adenylyl cyclase response, possibly due to increased ßARK1 activity.9,10 This method of gene therapy would achieve transgene expression during the first postoperative day and continue for
2 to 3 weeks. This time course would correlate with the early postoperative period during which inotropic support is most important. These studies also raise interest in the possibility of gene therapy with retrograde cardioplegia or with percutaneous methods of CPB, such as Heartport.
This study represents the first use of CPB for global myocardial gene delivery. Moreover, it demonstrates the feasibility of intracoronary gene delivery in the pig, whose heart is similar to humans. The study is limited insofar as the subjects were healthy neonatal piglets. Further work is needed to characterize the effectiveness of this technique in adult animals and those with ventricular dysfunction. In addition, current efforts are directed at demonstrating the biochemical and hemodynamic consequences of gene delivery using functional transgenes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 30, 2001; revision received May 9, 2001; accepted May 11, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
White D, Hata J, Shah A, et al. Preservation of myocardial ß-adrenergic receptor signaling delays the development of heart failure after myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 54285433.
3.
Hajjar R, Schmid U, Matsui T, et al. Modulation of ventricular function through gene transfer in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 52515256.
4.
Akhter S, Skaer C, Kypson A, et al. Restoration of ß-adrenergic signaling in failing cardiac ventricular myocytes via adenoviral-mediated gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 1210012105.
5.
Lodge A, Chai P, Daggett C, et al. Methylprednisolone reduces the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in neonatal piglets: timing of dose is important. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 117: 515522.
6.
Kypson A, Peppel K, Akhter S, et al. Ex-vivo adenoviral-mediated gene transfer to the transplanted adult rat heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 115: 623630.
7.
Koch W, Rockman H, Samama P, et al. Cardiac function in mice overexpressing the Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase or a BARK inhibitor. Science. 1995; 268: 13501353.
8. Marshall D, Palasis M, Lepore J, et al. Biocompatibility of cardiovascular gene delivery catheters with adenovirus vectors: an important determinant of the efficiency of cardiovascular gene transfer. Mol Ther. 2000; 1: 423429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Schwinn D, Leone B, Spahn D, et al. Desensitization of myocardial ß-adrenergic receptors during cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for early uncoupling and late downregulation. Circulation. 1991; 84: 25592567.
10. Sun L, Pantuck C, Morelli J, et al. Perioperative lymphocyte adenylyl cyclase function in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24: 16541659.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Kaye, A. Preovolos, T. Marshall, M. Byrne, M. Hoshijima, R. Hajjar, J. A. Mariani, S. Pepe, K. R. Chien, and J. M. Power Percutaneous Cardiac Recirculation-Mediated Gene Transfer of an Inhibitory Phospholamban Peptide Reverses Advanced Heart Failure in Large Animals J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. J. Muller, H. A. Katus, and R. Bekeredjian Targeting the heart with gene therapy-optimized gene delivery methods Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2007; 73(3): 453 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Bridges, K. Gopal, D. E. Holt, C. Yarnall, S. Cole, R. B. Anderson, X. Yin, A. Nelson, B. W. Kozyak, Z. Wang, et al. Efficient myocyte gene delivery with complete cardiac surgical isolation in situ J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1364 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Jones, J. A. Petrofski, K. H. Wilson, C. Steenbergen, W. J. Koch, and C. A. Milano {beta}2 Adrenoceptor gene therapy ameliorates left ventricular dysfunction following cardiac surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(6): 1161 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Deng, S. Szabo, T. Khomenko, M. R. Jadus, and M. Yoshida Gene Therapy with Adenoviral Plasmids or Naked DNA of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Accelerates Healing of Duodenal Ulcer in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2004; 311(3): 982 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Sellke Gene therapy in cardiac surgery: Is there a role? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2003; 125(5): 994 - 997. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Beeri, J. L. Guerrero, G. Supple, S. Sullivan, R. A. Levine, and R. J. Hajjar New Efficient Catheter-Based System for Myocardial Gene Delivery Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1756 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Bridges, J. M. Burkman, R. Malekan, S. M. Konig, H. Chen, C. B. Yarnall, T. J. Gardner, A. S. Stewart, M. M. Stecker, T. Patterson, et al. Global cardiac-specific transgene expression using cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac isolation Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1939 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.M. Jones, K.H. Wilson, W.J. Koch, and C.A. Milano Adenoviral gene transfer to the heart during cardiopulmonary bypass: effect of myocardial protection technique on transgene expression Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 847 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |