(Circulation. 2001;104:2351.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Department of Radiological Sciences (S.M., Y.Z.) and the Department of Medicine (Cardiology) (S.M.), University of CaliforniaIrvine, and the Department of Bioengineering (G.S.K.), University of CaliforniaSan Diego, La Jolla.
Reprint requests to Sabee Molloi, PhD, Department of Radiological Sciences, Medical Sciences I, B-140, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. E-mail symolloi{at}uci.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Coronary arteriography was performed in 9 swine (body weight 20 to 55 kg) after power injection of contrast material (2 mL/s for 3 seconds) into the left main coronary artery. Phase-matched subtracted images were used to quantify regional lumen volume by a video densitometry technique. The in vivo volume measurements were validated by a polymer cast of the coronary arterial tree made at physiological pressure. The measured cast volume (VC) and video densitometric regional lumen volume (VVD) were related by VVD=1.06 VC-0.01 mL (r=0.99). The root mean square and systematic errors for these measurements were 17% and -3%, respectively.
Conclusions A video densitometry technique for quantification of coronary lumen volume was validated both in vitro and in vivo in a swine animal model. The present results demonstrated the feasibility and potential utility of the video densitometry technique for accurate measurement of regional lumen volume in vivo. This study contributes to the understanding of the angiographic methods used for the assessment of coronary artery disease and indicates that this technique can potentially be used for quantification of diffuse coronary artery disease during routine coronary arteriography.
Key Words: arteries angiography coronary disease imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unlike diameter measurements, volume accounts for all changes in lumen geometry over an arterial segment, and it is not dependent on the imaging projection angle. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angioscopic techniques have been used for lumen volume reconstruction.13 An inherent limitation of IVUS, however, is the wedging of the ultrasonic catheter in the case of severe stenosis and in small vessels.4 This restricts the application of 3D IVUS to large vessels without severe stenosis.
Digital angiography can be used to measure lumen volume by geometric and video densitometry techniques. The geometric techniques consist of vessel diameter measurement and arterial length measurement by 3D reconstruction of the arterial centerline.5,6 These techniques require biplane images and assume a circular or elliptical cross section, which does not apply in the presence of obstructive atherosclerosis.79 Video densitometry techniques do not require any assumptions regarding the geometry of the vessel cross section and do not require a 3D reconstruction of the coronary arterial tree. There have been reports of video densitometry techniques for lumen volume measurement in physical phantoms10 and human coronary casts.11 In vivo volume measurements using video densitometry techniques have been hampered, however, by the nonlinearity due to physical degradation factors in the image intensifier television imaging chain and the lack of knowledge about blood iodine concentration. We have previously developed techniques that address these limitations.1214 In the present investigation, a video densitometry technique for quantification of coronary artery lumen volume has been validated both in vitro and in vivo in a swine animal model.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each animal was positioned under the image intensifier, and the projection was optimized for separation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCx) perfusion beds (
30° right anterior oblique). Coronary arteriograms were then obtained after power injection of 6 mL of contrast material (Omnipaque, Nycomed Amersham) with an iodine concentration of 350 mg/mL and an injection rate of 2 mL/s. To minimize the effect of ventilation, the respirator was turned off at the end of full expiration during image acquisition. An iodine calibration phantom was imaged over the chest of the animal for system calibration purposes.15 The system iodine calibration was repeated if any of the imaging parameters were changed. After completion of the in vivo coronary arteriograms, we then proceeded to the postmortem studies.
Isolated Heart Preparation
A midline sternotomy was performed, and anticoagulation was induced with heparin (100 U/kg). An incision was made in the pericardium, and the heart was supported in a pericardial cradle. The animal was heavily anesthetized, and the heart was arrested with a saturated KCl solution given through a jugular vein. The heart was then excised with the ascending aorta clamped to keep air bubbles out of the coronary vessels. The right coronary artery (RCA), LAD, and LCx were cannulated under saline to avoid air bubbles. The coronary arteries were then immediately perfused with an iso-osmotic, cardioplegic rinsing solution to maintain the myocardium relaxed and the vasculature vasodilated.16 Cardioplegic solution was continuously infused into the arteries at 100 mm Hg. The heart was placed in a saline bath and positioned for image acquisition. Coronary arteriograms were then acquired at 1 frame per second after power injection of contrast material (6 mL at 2 mL/s). The heart was rotated to get appropriate projection angles for imaging the RCA, LAD, and LCx. Temporal subtraction images were formed after the images were corrected for scatter and veiling glare.12
Polymer Cast Preparation
After the postmortem coronary arteriograms were acquired, a cast of the coronary arteries was prepared as described previously.16 Briefly, Microfil (Canton Bio-Medical) was used to make a solid cast of the coronary vasculature. Cab-O-Sil (3% by weight, Eastman Kodak) was added to Microfil to stop the flow in the small arterial vessel.16 A freshly catalyzed (6% stannous 2-ethylhexoate and 3% ethyl silicate) solution of Microfil and Cab-O-Sil was perfused through the major coronary arteries (RCA, LAD, and LCx) and maintained at a pressure of 100 mm Hg until the solution hardened,
40 minutes. All the imaging studies and cast preparation were completed within 4 hours postmortem. The heart was then refrigerated in saline for several days to increase the strength of the cast before the corrosion of the myocardial tissue with 30% KOH. The casts were dissected and cut into 5 to 9 segments at the bifurcation on the main trunk of the arteries. The bifurcations were chosen as landmarks for exact correspondence between casts and coronary arteriograms. Lumen volume was calculated from the weight and the known density (0.99 g/cm3) of the casts.
Image Acquisition and Processing
All images were acquired by use of a conventional x-ray tube (Dynamax 79-45/120, Machlett Laboratories), a constant-potential x-ray generator (Optimus M200, Philips Medical Systems), a 23/15-cm CsI image intensifier, a focused grid (8:1 grid ratio, 36 lines/cm), and a CCD camera (Multicam MC-1134GN, Texas Instruments Inc). An adjustable aperture controlled the light intensity in front of the camera. The video signal was linearly digitized to 640x480x8-bit precision with a Matrox Pulsar frame grabber (Matrox Electronics Systems Ltd) and a Pentium III computer.
The images were acquired with the 15-cm image intensifier mode and a large (1.2-mm nominal) focal spot. Corrections were made for the spatially varying scatter and veiling glare. A convolution-filtering technique was used to estimate scatter-glare distribution in images without the need to sample the scatter-glare intensity for each experiment.12 This technique uses the exposure parameters and the detected intensity distribution to estimate scatter-glare intensity by predicting the total thickness at every pixel in the image. The thickness information is used to estimate scatter glare on a pixel-by-pixel basis.
Volume Measurement in Physical Phantoms
Phantom studies were made to determine the accuracy of the imaging system for volume measurement. Cylindrical vessel phantoms were constructed of plastic tubing with inside diameters of 1.3 to 4.7 mm to produce known lumen volumes of 0.06, 0.13, 0.21, 0.26, 0.26, 0.39, 0.41, 0.52, 0.52, 0.78, and 1.04 mL. The tubes were filled with 100% contrast material and sealed on both sides. Images were acquired by placing all the tubing over a humanoid chest phantom. A region of interest (ROI) approximately outlining the visible contrast material was drawn manually. The integrated video densitometry signal was directly converted to iodine mass by use of the system iodine calibration curve.15 Iodine mass was converted to volume by use of the known iodine concentration of the contrast material.
To simulate plaque in a vessel, Plexiglas rods (1.56 mm in diameter) were inserted into plastic tubing with inside diameters of 3.0 and 4.3 mm to produce known lumen volumes of 0.14, 0.18, 0.28, 0.33, 0.42, 0.51, 0.56, 0.69, 0.71, and 0.87 mL. The number of the Plexiglas rods was varied in different tubing to produce up to 50% area stenosis. The "stenotic" vessel phantoms were filled with 100% contrast and imaged in the anteroposterior (AP), 30° right anterior oblique (RAO), and 30° left anterior oblique (LAO) projections over the humanoid chest phantom. The volume measurements were performed with both the video densitometry and edge-detection algorithms.13 In the edge-detection algorithm, the vessel edges were defined relative to the first- and second-derivative extrema of the vessel profile.17 The diameter and length information measured with the edge-detection algorithm was used to calculate arterial volume assuming a circular cross section.
For each of the above measurements, linear regression analysis was performed for measured versus actual lumen volumes. The variance of the data points about the best-fit line reflects the precision of the measurements. A second variance was calculated, assuming that the data were fit to a line with unit slope and zero intercept (y=x line). The variance about the unit line reflects the accuracy of the measurements. The accuracy and precision of the edge-detection and video densitometry techniques were compared.
In Vivo Volume Measurement
Lumen volume measurements were made from contrast pass curves using phase-matched temporal subtraction images of the LAD and LCx. No in vivo angiograms were acquired from the RCA. An ROI approximately outlining the arterial segment of interest was drawn manually. A 3-pixel background shell was drawn just outside the arterial ROI. The background ROI was used to estimate and correct for build-up of iodine signal in the myocardium included in the arterial ROI. Figure 1 shows a coronary arteriogram with an arterial ROI on the first diagonal branch of the LAD. The maximum in the integrated video densitometry signal in the contrast-pass curve was converted to lumen volume with the system iodine calibration curve and the known iodine concentration of the contrast material.15 An iodine calibration curve was generated by imaging a calibration phantom with known volumes of contrast material over the heart region. A correction was made for differential magnification between the calibration phantom and the coronary artery of interest. Regional volume measurements were made by drawing different arterial ROIs corresponding to arterial segments between bifurcation points on the main trunk of the LAD and LCx. The arterial tree was divided into 5 to 9 segments. The branches with visible overlap were not used.
|
To assess the reproducibility of the technique, regional volume measurements were made after 6 pairs of contrast injections in 2 animals. The contrast injections were separated by
10 minutes. The arterial tree was divided into 5 to 9 segments. All the image acquisition and processing parameters were kept fixed. Additional studies were done in 2 animals to further challenge the reproducibility of the technique and to simulate repeated coronary arteriograms in a clinical setting. All the imaging parameters were recorded during the first coronary arteriogram. After the first study, the x-ray table was moved, and the image intensifier was rotated. All the imaging parameters were reproduced, and a separate system iodine calibration was made for the second coronary arteriogram. Two different operators analyzed the images. Regional volume measurements were made from 4 pairs of contrast injections. Each arterial tree was divided into 8 segments. The measured regional volumes from each pair were compared.
The accuracy of the technique was assessed by a comparison of the regional volume measurements by video densitometry and the volume of the casts in 3 animals. The regional volume measurements from 2 to 3 coronary arteriograms were averaged. The LAD and LCx casts were cut into 5 to 9 segments, corresponding to the previously chosen arterial ROIs. The bifurcation points were used as anatomic landmarks to determine the correspondence between cast and coronary angiogram. Regional volume was calculated from the weight and the known density (0.99 g/mL) of the casts. The measured regional volumes from video densitometry were compared with the volumes from the cast segments.
Postmortem Volume Measurement
Postmortem coronary arteriograms were made to further validate the lumen volume measurement technique. Lumen volume measurements were made from temporal subtraction images of the LAD, LCx, and RCA. A total of 5 hearts were used for this purpose. Two animals were used for this purpose, in addition to 3 hearts from the above-described in vivo studies. The technique for regional volume measurement for the RCA was similar to the LAD and LCx, which was described in the above section.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Postmortem Studies
A comparison of regional arterial volume measurements from the casts and the video densitometry technique is shown in Figure 4. The lumen volumes measured from casts (VC) and video densitometry (VVD) were related by VVD=1.16VC-0.01 mL (r=0.97). The root mean square (RMS) and systematic errors for these measurements were 19% and 4% of the mean densitometry volume, respectively. The overestimation of lumen volume measurements is due to the poor image quality of the postmortem coronary angiograms, which is because contrast material is not completely washed out of the myocardium after repeated injections.
|
In Vivo Studies
The results of lumen volume measurements for repeated coronary arteriograms are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5A shows volume measurements for repeated contrast injections, where the first (VF) and second (VS) measured volumes were related by VS=0.98VF+0.001 mL (r=1.00). The RMS and systematic errors for repeated measurements were 9% and -1%, respectively. The results of volume measurements for repeated coronary arteriograms, with different operators to analyze the images, are shown in Figure 5B. VF and VS were related by VS=1.00VF+0.001 mL (r=0.99). The RMS and systematic errors for repeated measurements were 9% and 0.3%, respectively. The results of in vivo volume validation using cast data are shown in Table 2 and Figure 6. VC and VVD were related by VVD=1.06VC-0.01 mL (r=0.99). The RMS and systematic errors for these measurements were 17% and -3%, respectively. .
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Validation of the Method
The regional volume measurements were validated with a casting technique. Although the validation required matching between small segments of the coronary artery cast and the corresponding segments in the coronary arteriograms, the results show that reliable volume measurements can be made by this technique (see Figures 4 through 6). The reproducibility of the technique was verified by making regional volume measurements from repeated coronary arteriograms. It might be possible to further improve the reliability of the volume measurements by maximally dilating the epicardial coronary arteries with pharmacological agents such as nitroglycerin. It is also possible to further improve the technique by power injection of larger boluses of contrast at a higher injection rate. This will help minimize mixing of blood with the contrast bolus that enters the coronary arteries.
Physical phantoms were used to evaluate the accuracy of the video densitometry technique for assessment of lumen volume at the site of irregular coronary lesions. The results show that the video densitometry technique can accurately measure volume in vessel phantoms with irregular cross section (see Figure 3). Furthermore, the volume measurements were not dependent on the imaging projection angle.
Critique of the Method
A potential limitation of this technique for eventual clinical implementation is motion artifacts in the images. All the volume measurements in this study were made within 3 seconds after contrast injection. This means that the patient will have to hold his or her breath for a total of
5 seconds. A breath-hold for this short time interval should not be a limitation for the majority of patients.
Overlap of vessels is another potential limitation of this technique. This problem is an inherent limitation of the projection nature of radiographic images. It is possible, however, to choose a projection that will minimize those potential errors. A related source of error is the iodine accumulation in the myocardium and its contribution to the measured volume. This potential source of error was minimized by background myocardium correction of the integrated gray levels in the arterial ROI with an ROI shell over the myocardium. The iodine accumulation in the myocardium was more severe in postmortem arteriograms, in which contrast material does not wash out between injections.
The proposed video densitometry technique requires the knowledge of iodine concentration in coronary arteries for absolute volume measurement. Previous studies have shown that power injection of contrast material into the coronary artery can produce a complete replacement of incoming blood with contrast material.18,19 Power injection produces backpressure that momentarily prevents blood from entering the coronary artery. The magnitude of the generated backpressure depends on the injection rate, the ratio of vascular and aortic resistance, and vascular compliance.19
Another requirement for absolute volume measurement is system iodine calibration, which relates background-subtracted integrated gray level to iodine mass. Iodine mass is converted to volume from the known iodine concentration of the contrast material. Although it is possible to predict the calibration curve with image acquisition parameters,15 a different calibration curve was generated for each imaging projection angle in this study. This was done to minimize any error in predicting the calibration factor.
An important factor in accurate iodine quantification is image quality. The contrast-to-noise ratio of the acquired images ultimately determines the accuracy of any subsequent image analysis. It is important to minimize the dynamic range in the acquired images by removing the bright spots in the image. This was done by careful use of beam attenuation filters. More sophisticated x-ray beam equalization techniques, however, could also be used for this purpose.20
Finally, a potential source of error in validation of the in vivo volume measurement is the uncertainty in correspondence between the cast and image data. Arterial branching points were used as anatomic landmarks to match cast and image data. The arterial branching angle and the imaging projection angle may cause some uncertainty in determining the exact arterial branching point in the image. This can potentially introduce error in the in vivo validation of the technique.
Clinical Implications
The present technique can be used to measure the progression and regression of atherosclerosis in an arterial segment or the entire coronary arterial tree from coronary arteriograms acquired in different time points. This will quantify the relative change of lumen volume in a specified arterial segment. Lumen volume measurements can also potentially be used for quantification of diffuse coronary artery disease.21 In this case, it is necessary to determine whether a given measured volume for an arterial tree or subtree is normal for the size of the myocardial mass it perfuses. We have previously shown that there is a power law relationship between the cumulative lumen volume and the sum of branch lengths in a coronary artery tree.21 Hence, it is possible to determine the extent of diffuse coronary artery disease by establishing the relationship between the lumen volume and the cumulative arterial branch lengths for normal human coronary arteries. Previous studies have also shown that there is a power law relationship between the diameter of a stem and the sum of coronary artery branch lengths.2123 This relationship addresses the question of whether a measured vessel diameter is too small for the size of the myocardial mass it perfuses.22,23 Conversely, lumen volume gives global information for the entire coronary tree or subtree. Therefore, the volume and diameter relationships provide complimentary quantitative information regarding the extent of diffuse coronary artery disease. The diameter relationship is inherently more variable, however, than the volume relationship.21
In conclusion, a video densitometry technique for quantification of coronary lumen volume was validated both in vitro and in vivo in a swine animal model. The present results demonstrated the feasibility and potential utility of the video densitometry technique for accurate measurement of regional lumen volume in vivo. Despite potential clinical limitations, this study contributes to the understanding of the angiographic methods used for the assessment of coronary artery disease and indicates that this technique can potentially be used for quantification of diffuse coronary artery disease during routine coronary arteriography.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 17, 2001; revision received August 6, 2001; accepted August 20, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. von Birgelen C, Slager CJ, Di Mario C, et al. Volumetric intracoronary ultrasound: a new maximum confidence approach for the quantitative assessment of progression-regression of atherosclerosis? Atherosclerosis. 1995; 118 (suppl): S103S113.
3. von Birgelen C, van der Lugt A, Nicosia A, et al. Computerized assessment of coronary lumen and atherosclerotic plaque dimensions in three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound correlated with histomorphometry. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 12021209.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Haase J, Ozaki Y, Di Mario C, et al. Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography. Eur Heart J. 1995; 16: 112119.
5. Wahle A, Wellnhofer E, Mugaragu I, et al. Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995; 14: 230241.
6. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Mugaragu I, et al. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Int J Card Imaging. 1999; 15: 339353.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Thomas AC, Davies MJ, Dilly N, et al. Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. Br Heart J. 1986; 55: 129139.
8. Escaned J, Foley DP, Haase J, et al. Quantitative angiography during coronary angioplasty with a single angiographic view: a comparison of automated edge detection and videodensitometric techniques. Am Heart J. 1993; 126: 13261333.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J. 1994; 127: 243251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Lièvre M, Finet G, Maupas J. Validation of a new quantitative coronary angiography analysis system used to evaluate densitometric lumen remodelling. Int J Card Imaging. 1997; 13: 1522; discussion 23.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Haase J, Slager CJ, Keane D, et al. Quantification of intracoronary volume by videodensitometry: validation study using fluid filling of human coronary casts. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994; 33: 8994; discussion 95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Ersahin A, Molloi S, Yao-Jin Q. A digital filtration technique for scatter-glare correction based on thickness estimation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995; 14: 587595.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Molloi S, Ersahin A, Hicks J, et al. In vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Int J Card Imaging. 1995; 11: 223231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Molloi S, Ersahin A, Tang J, et al. Quantification of volumetric coronary blood flow with dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Circulation. 1996; 93: 19191927.
15. Molloi S, Bednarz G, Tang J, et al. Absolute volumetric coronary blood flow measurement with digital subtraction angiography. Int J Card Imaging. 1998; 14: 137145.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Kassab GS, Rider CA, Tang NJ, et al. Morphometry of pig coronary arterial trees. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265(1 pt 2): H350H365.
17.
Mancini GBJ, Simon SB, McGillen MJ, et al. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation. 1987; 75: 452460.
18.
Gardiner GA, Meyerovitz MF, Boxt LM, et al. Selective coronary angiography using a power injector. Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146: 831833.
19. Molloi SY, Ersahin A, Roeck WW, et al. Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA. Invest Radiol. 1991; 26: 119127.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Molloi S, Tang J, Mather T, et al. Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography. Med Phys. 1999; 26: 26842692.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Zhou Y, Kassab GS, Molloi S. On the design of the coronary arterial tree: a generalization of Murrays law. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44: 29292945.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Basic structure-function relations of the coronary vascular tree: the basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1992; 85: 19872003.
23. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 783797.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Kalsho and G. S. Kassab Bifurcation asymmetry of the porcine coronary vasculature and its implications on coronary flow heterogeneity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2493 - H2500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Hamza, Q. Dang, X. Lu, A. Mian, S. Molloi, and G. S. Kassab Effect of passive myocardium on the compliance of porcine coronary arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H653 - H660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |