Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;104:1436-1440
doi: 10.1161/hc3601.095576
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilgers, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. F.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hilgers, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. F.E.
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies

(Circulation. 2001;104:1436.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockade Prevents Lethal Malignant Hypertension

Relation to Kidney Inflammation

Karl F. Hilgers, MD; Andrea Hartner, PhD; Markus Porst, PhD; Roland Veelken, MD; Johannes F.E. Mann, MD

From the Department of Medicine IV, University of Erlangen, Nürnberg (K.F.H., A.H., M.P., R.V.); the Department of Medicine VI, Schwabing General Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich (J.F.E.M.); and the German Institute for High Blood Pressure Research, Heidelberg (K.F.H., R.V., J.F.E.M.), Germany.

Reprint requests to Karl F. Hilgers, MD, Nephrology Research Laboratory, Loschgestrasse 8, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany. E-mail karl.hilgers{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Angiotensin II is elevated in malignant hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade can prevent the development of malignant hypertension even in the absence of a blood pressure-lowering effect.

Methods and Results— Two-kidney, 1-clip rats were followed up for 28 days; blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography and intra-arterially. After a 2-week run-in phase, rats received valsartan at a dose of 0.3 (n=14) or 3 (n=12) mg · kg-1 · d-1 or solvent (n=27). Only the higher dose of valsartan, but not the lower dose, decreased blood pressure. Both doses of valsartan prevented the development of lethal malignant hypertension. Twenty of 27 solvent-treated renovascular hypertensive rats died, but only 3 of 14 rats treated with the low dose and 1 of 12 rats treated with the high dose of valsartan died. Histological signs of malignant nephrosclerosis were found in all rats examined that had died throughout the study and in 6 of 7 surviving solvent-treated renovascular hypertensive animals. Increased expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and prominent interstitial influx of macrophages occurred in the nonclipped kidneys exposed to high pressure in solvent-treated rats. These alterations were prevented by valsartan at both doses, irrespective of blood pressure effects.

Conclusions— Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade by valsartan prevents lethal malignant hypertension independently of blood pressure. The results suggest that reduction of angiotensin-induced inflammation in the kidney may contribute to the protective effects of valsartan.


Key Words: angiotensin • hypertension • kidney • leukocytes • survival


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Malignant hypertension is characterized by rapidly progressive target-organ injury, often out of proportion to the level of blood pressure itself. Injury to the kidney is an important feature of malignant hypertension. Moreover, the kidney plays a key role in the development of malignant hypertension: salt wasting and alterations in intrarenal hemodynamics are hallmarks of early malignant nephrosclerosis.1,2

Recent studies have reinforced the notion that angiotensin (Ang) II plays an important role in the development of malignant hypertension. Using different transgenic rat models characterized by overexpression of genes of the renin-angiotensin system, Montgomery et al3 and Mervaala et al4,5 showed that blockade of Ang II prevented the development of malignant hypertension in these models. These authors provided some evidence that inhibition of converting enzyme3 and renin4 were effective even if blood pressure was not lowered. Blood pressure, however, was assessed only by the tail-cuff measurements in anesthetized animals.

We tested the hypothesis that inhibition of the action of Ang II on its type 1 receptor (AT1)6 prevents the occurrence of lethal malignant hypertension independently of blood pressure lowering. Blood pressure was measured intra-arterially. We studied the occurrence of malignant nephrosclerosis in the 2-kidney, 1-clip (2K1C) model of renovascular hypertension, which is comparable to renovascular hypertension in humans. Infiltration of macrophages, which occurs in the kidney exposed to high blood pressure,7,8 was investigated as a potential nonhemodynamic mechanism.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Renovascular Hypertension
Rats were housed in a room maintained at 22±2°C, exposed to a 12-hour dark/light cycle. The animals were allowed unlimited access to chow (No. 1320, Altromin) and tap water. All procedures performed on animals were done in accordance with NIH guidelines and were approved by the local government authorities (Regierung von Mittelfranken, AZ No. 621-2531.3-10/94).

2K1C renovascular hypertension was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) weighing 150 to 170 g by placing a silver clip of 0.2-mm ID around the left renal artery through a flank incision under anesthesia with ketamine/xylazine as previously described.7 Control animals underwent sham operation without placement of the clip. Weight and systolic blood pressure (by tail-cuff plethysmography7) were measured weekly.

Treatment
After 2 weeks, only animals with systolic blood pressure >150 mm Hg, which was achieved in 80% to 90% of all renal-clip animals, were included in the 2K1C groups. Rats were treated with 2 doses of the AT1 antagonist (AT1RA) valsartan or with placebo. Twelve 2K1C rats and 5 sham-operated rats received 3 mg · kg-1 · d-1 AT1RA, 14 2K1C rats received 0.3 mg · kg-1 · d-1 valsartan, and 27 2K1C rats and 10 sham-operated rats received solvent. Osmotic minipumps (Alzet model 2002, Alza) that delivered 0.5 µL/h for 14 days were implanted in the peritoneal cavity through a small midline incision under ether anesthesia. Valsartan (55.8 mg/mL for the higher dose and 5.58 mg/mL for the lower dose) was dissolved in 0.46 mol/L KOH (pH 7.2). Animals were followed up for 14 days.

To obtain better measurements of blood pressure during treatment, we performed an additional study. Two weeks after clipping, 6 2K1C rats received the high dose and 6 2K1C animals were treated with the low dose of AT1RA, and 8 2K1C and 5 sham-operated animals received solvent. After 9 days of treatment, all animals were instrumented with femoral artery catheters for intra-arterial blood pressure measurements under ether anesthesia as described previously.8 Measurements were performed on the same day 4 hours after termination of anesthesia via transducers connected to a polygraph (Hellige).

After the organs had been weighed, kidneys were decapsulated. Part of each kidney was immediately snap-frozen on liquid nitrogen for protein and RNA extraction, and a second part was put in methyl-Carnoy solution (60% methanol, 30% chloroform, and 10% glacial acetic acid) for fixation.

Immunohistochemistry of Kidney Sections
After overnight fixation in methyl-Carnoy solution, tissues were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Sections (2 µm) were cut with a Leitz SM 2000 R microtome (Leica Instruments). After deparaffinization and blockade of endogenous peroxidase activity, the immunohistochemical detection of macrophages (monoclonal ED-1 antibody, Biozol), macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; polyclonal rabbit antiserum9 kindly provided by Dr T. Yoshimura, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Md), and collagen I (Biozol) was performed as previously described.8 The Vectastain DAB kit (Vector Laboratory) was used as a chromogen. Each slide was counterstained with hematoxylin. Renal interstitial macrophages were counted as described previously8 in 30 medium-power (magnification x250) cortical views per section and expressed as cells/mm2. Interstitial collagen I was quantified in 30 medium-power views by means of an 11x11-point grid. The percentage of grid points corresponding to a stained area was calculated.

Northern and Western Blot for MCP-1 mRNA and Protein
RNA and protein were extracted from kidney cortical tissue by use of TRI reagent (MRC Inc). Northern blot analysis was performed with full-length rat MCP-1 cDNA as described previously.8 Western blot was performed8 after proteins had been separated with a denaturing 10% to 18% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gel in the buffer system described by Schägger and von Jagow.10 The membrane was incubated in a 1:1000 dilution of an MCP-1 antibody and a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, followed by luminescence immunodetection (ECL, Amersham). The x-ray films used for detection were then analyzed by densitometry.

Statistical Analysis
Two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test with adjustment for multiple comparison, was used to test the significance of differences between groups. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant. The procedures were carried out with Statistica software (StatSoft). Values are displayed as mean±SEM unless indicated otherwise.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
On the basis of weight measurements, rats treated with low-dose AT1RA received a mean dose of 0.32 mg · kg-1 · d-1 valsartan (SD 0.05 mg · kg-1 · d-1), and high-dose AT1RA-treated animals received a mean dose of 3.05 mg · kg-1 · d-1 (SD 0.44 mg · kg-1 · d-1). Systolic blood pressure was reduced but not normalized by high-dose AT1RA, whereas blood pressure was not altered by low-dose AT1RA (Figure 1A). Untreated 2K1C rats showed substantial mortality (20 of 27 rats) during the study (Figure 1B). Death was usually preceded by 3 to 5 days of weight loss. Both high- and low-dose regimens of AT1RA prevented mortality (Figure 1B).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Systolic blood pressure (A) and survival (B) of sham-operated (n=15) and renovascular hypertensive rats treated with solvent (n=27) or valsartan (AT1RA) in high dose (3 mg · kg-1 · d-1, n=12) or low dose (0.3 mg · kg-1 · d-1, n=14) for 14 days. Drug therapy began 14 days after renal artery clipping. A, *Significant differences between AT1RA-treated and solvent-treated 2K1C rats. B, Numbers indicate number of animals surviving to end of study.

In an additional study with intra-arterial blood pressure recordings, 5 rats of each group survived to the day of measurement. Intra-arterial measurements confirmed that mean blood pressure was not affected by low-dose AT1RA and was lowered but not normalized by the higher dose of valsartan (Figure 2A).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Arterial blood pressure (A) and renal macrophage infiltration (B). Mean arterial pressure was measured via femoral artery catheters in conscious rats (n=5 per group) 23 days after renal artery clipping after 9 days of drug treatment. Interstitial macrophage influx in nonclipped right kidney exposed to high blood pressure was counted after immunostaining for macrophage marker ED-1. See Figure 1B for numbers of animals per group. 2K1C indicates renovascular hypertensive rats; AT1RA, valsartan 0.3 (low dose) or 3 (high dose) mg · kg-1 · d-1. *P<0.05 vs sham-operated animals; §P<0.05 vs untreated (solvent) 2K1C.

The Table shows body weight and the ratios of heart and kidney weights to body weight. Both doses of valsartan decreased the weight of the nonclipped, contralateral kidney and of the heart. The higher dose was significantly more effective in lowering heart weight (Table). Valsartan caused a dose-dependent decrease of the weight of the clipped kidney (Table). In sham-operated, normotensive rats, high-dose AT1RA had no effect on blood pressure or organ weight (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Body Weight and Organ Wt/Body Wt Ratios

Screening by light microscopy of routine kidney sections of all surviving animals and 11 that had died for signs of malignant hypertension (fibrinoid necrosis and/or onion-shaped vascular cell proliferative lesions) revealed the presence of these changes in all animals that had died throughout the study, in all but 1 (6 of 7) surviving solvent-treated 2K1C rats, and in 4 of 11 low-dose AT1RA-treated 2K1C but not in any sham-operated or high-dose AT1RA-treated rat (see Figure 3 for examples).



View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Examples of vascular lesions in 2K1C renovascular hypertensive rats after periodic acid-Schiff staining. A to C, Right kidneys; D and E, heart. A, Bar=100 µm; same magnification for all panels. Arrows point to normal vessels in A (interlobular artery with branching afferent arteriole) and D (coronary vessel), sections from sham-operated rats. B, Fibrinoid necrotic lesion (arrow) surrounded by cells in right, nonclipped kidney of 2K1C rats exposed to hypertension. E, Arrows point to similar vascular lesions in heart of 2K1C rat. C, Section from right, nonclipped kidney of 2K1C rat exposed to hypertension. Black arrowhead indicates a vascular lesion with hyalinosis, necrosis, and occlusion; white arrowhead, hyalinosis of entire glomerular tuft.

Extracellular matrix accumulation in the nonclipped kidney exposed to high blood pressure was demonstrated by quantification of interstitial collagen I in 2K1C rats (16.7±1.7% versus 6.4±0.9% of cortical area in sham-operated rats, P<0.01). Collagen I was decreased by low-dose valsartan (12.1±2.3%, P<0.05 versus untreated 2K1C), and to an even greater degree by high-dose valsartan (8.3±2.2%, P<0.01 versus untreated 2K1C, P<0.05 versus low-dose valsartan).

There were more interstitial macrophages in the nonclipped kidney exposed to high blood pressure of 2K1C animals than in normal kidneys (Figure 2B). High- and low-dose regimens of AT1RA decreased macrophage infiltration to the same degree (Figure 2B). MCP-1 mRNA was increased significantly, to 172±8% of control levels in the nonclipped kidneys of 2K1C (Figure 4A). Valsartan blunted the increase of MCP-1 mRNA (101±20% of control levels at the low dose and 72±7% at the high dose, P<0.05). The elevation of MCP-1 protein (206±3% of control levels, P<0.05) was also blunted by both doses of AT1RA (95±6% of control levels at the low dose and 86±9% at the high dose, P<0.05, Figure 4B). By immunohistochemistry, MCP-1 protein was detected in vascular smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells, glomerular epithelial cells, macrophages, and occasionally but rarely in tubular cells in the nonclipped kidney of untreated 2K1C rats, as we described in more detail recently.8 In valsartan-treated 2K1C rats, MCP-1 staining was restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells, as in sham-operated animals.8



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Northern (A) and Western (B) blots for MCP-1 mRNA and protein, respectively. Protein and RNA were extracted from renal cortex of right kidneys exposed to high blood pressure. Each lane was loaded with right kidney RNA or protein from a single renovascular hypertensive (2K1C) or sham-operated (sham) rat. Results for 3 rats per group are shown; data are representative of 6 rats per group. The - and + signs below blots indicate treatment with 0.3 (+) or 3 (++) mg · kg-1 · d-1 AT1RA or vehicle (-). Glycosylated MCP-1 protein eluted in several bands between 14 and 17 kDa; only 14-kDa band was used for densitometry (see text for results).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our results show that blockade of the AT1 receptor by valsartan prevents the development of lethal malignant hypertension in renovascular hypertensive rats even if blood pressure is not decreased. Furthermore, the data suggest that AT1-mediated nonpressor, proinflammatory effects, ie, induction of the chemokine MCP-1 and macrophage infiltration, may contribute to the development of malignant hypertension.

Our observation that AT1 blockade prevented malignant hypertension regardless of its effect on blood pressure confirms and extends recent reports in other models of malignant hypertension in the rat.35 Montgomery et al3 showed that ACE inhibition lowered the frequency of malignant hypertension in Ren2-transgenic hypertensive rats. These authors used a dose of ACE inhibition that did not lower systolic blood pressure as measured by a tail-cuff method under anesthesia, but they did not perform intra-arterial recordings.3 Mervaala and coworkers4,5 used a new transgenic rat model with extreme overexpression of the human renin and angiotensinogen genes, which leads to early mortality in all rats.4 In these animals, mortality could be prevented if blood pressure was lowered with blockers of the renin-angiotensin system but not with a conventional triple therapy, despite comparable antihypertensive efficacy, as judged from tail-cuff measurements.5

Unlike these transgenic models of malignant hypertension,35 which are characterized by an extreme overexpression of genes of the renin-angiotensin system and are therefore expected to be dependent on Ang II, renovascular hypertension is an important cause of high blood pressure in human patients. The prevalence of renovascular hypertension among all hypertensive patients is subject to debate (for review see Conlon et al11) and appears to be lower than previously thought.12 There is little doubt, however, that renovascular hypertension is associated with a higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than essential hypertension.11 Rats with unilateral renal artery clips develop renovascular hypertension and malignant hypertension in a predictable manner, depending on the size of the animal and the ID of the clip.1 Death from malignant hypertension is usually preceded by several days of volume and weight loss.1

Our results demonstrate an important role of the AT1 receptor for the development of malignant hypertension. The AT1 receptor antagonist valsartan prevented lethal malignant hypertension even when blood pressure was not affected. To avoid a possible selection bias due to mortality of the animals with the highest blood pressure levels, we measured intra-arterial blood pressure in a second group of animals followed up for a somewhat shorter time. In addition to our blood pressure measurements, the notion that 0.3 mg · kg-1 · d-1 valsartan has no important effect on blood pressure is also supported by previous reports from other laboratories,13,14 including telemetric measurements performed by Webb et al.14 These authors reported only minute effects of a somewhat higher dose of valsartan, 0.5 mg · kg-1 · d-1, on blood pressure.14 In the absence of telemetric measurements, we cannot exclude such minute effects in our study, but we consider it highly unlikely that the massive effects of valsartan on survival can be explained solely by lowering of the mean arterial blood pressure by some 5 mm Hg. Interestingly, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system was reported to improve survival in scleroderma renal crisis,15 another form of thrombotic microangiopathy in the kidney. Thus, our data may have implications for human renal diseases beyond renovascular hypertension.

We do not try, however, to dispute the importance of high blood pressure for target organ damage. Some aspects of organ protection by valsartan were clearly dependent on blood pressure itself: both the organ weights and the measurement of renal interstitial collagen I indicate that the higher dose of valsartan, which lowered blood pressure, caused a greater amelioration of heart hypertrophy and nephrosclerosis. Unfortunately, the higher dose of valsartan also induced a more pronounced weight loss of the poststenotic left kidney, reminiscent of previous reports on the effects of ACE inhibition on the poststenotic kidney.16,17

Which factor(s) might explain the blood pressure-independent effect of valsartan on survival? We think that our data support the notion that AT1-mediated proinflammatory effects are important for the development of lethal malignant nephrosclerosis. We and others have previously shown that a marked infiltration of macrophages into the kidney occurs in angiotensin-dependent forms of hypertension, including Ang II infusion,18,19 renovascular hypertension,7,8,20,21 and overexpression of genes of the renin-angiotensin system in transgenic rats.4,8 Interstitial macrophage infiltration was decreased by valsartan regardless of whether or not blood pressure was affected.

The influx of macrophages may be due to AT1-mediated induction of the chemokine MCP-1. Ang II has been shown to induce MCP-1 expression via AT1 in vascular smooth muscle22,23 and in the kidney.8,24 The CC type chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), which binds to MCP-1, is necessary for the development of Ang II-induced macrophage infiltration and vascular hypertrophy.25 Recently, we reported that MCP-1 is localized in smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells, podocytes, tubular cells, and infiltrating macrophages in the nonclipped kidneys of renovascular hypertensive rats.8 Now, we observed that MCP-1 RNA and protein induction were blunted by valsartan independently of blood pressure, similar to its effects on macrophages. The precise role of MCP-1 for macrophage infiltration remains unclear because other chemokines19 or adhesion molecules4,20 might also contribute and because AT1 may activate macrophages directly.26,27 Results obtained with blocking antibodies against MCP-1 in glomerulonephritis, however, support the notion that MCP-1 plays a pivotal role for macrophage infiltration in the kidney.28,29 Moreover, the CCR2 receptor for MCP-1 is necessary for macrophage infiltration in aortic tissue in atherosclerosis30 and hypertension.25

In summary, we propose that the systemic activation of the renin-angiotensin system caused by obstructing one renal artery not only elevates blood pressure but also induces an inflammatory response in the nonclipped kidney. This inflammatory response is mediated via the AT1 receptor and is at least partially independent of blood pressure. AT1-mediated induction of the chemokine MCP-1 attracts macrophages, which in turn contribute to the development of renal tissue injury and malignant hypertension. Even a nonhypotensive dose of an AT1 antagonist, such as valsartan, can prevent this potentially lethal complication of hypertension.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a grant from Novartis, Basel, Switzerland, and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung IZKF-B12), Bonn, Germany. We thank Marc de Gasparo, Basel, Switzerland, for many helpful suggestions and for reading and discussing the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Elisabeth Buder, Miroslava Kupraszewicz-Hutzler, Rainer Wachtveitl, and Rita Zitzmann.

Received February 13, 2001; revision received May 30, 2001; accepted June 2, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Möhring J, Petri M, Szokol M, et al. Effects of saline drinking on malignant course of renal hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol. . 1976; 230: 849–857.

2. Dzau VJ, Siwek LG, Rosen S, et al. Sequential renal hemodynamics in experimental benign and malignant hypertension. Hypertension. . 1981; 3 (suppl I): I-63–I-68.

3. Montgomery HE, Kiernan LA, Whitworth CE, et al. Inhibition of tissue angiotensin converting enzyme activity prevents malignant hypertension in TGR(mREN2)27. J Hypertens. . 1998; 16: 635–643.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Mervaala EM, Muller DN, Park JK, et al. Monocyte infiltration and adhesion molecules in a rat model of high human renin hypertension. Hypertension. . 1999; 33: 389–395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Mervaala E, Muller DN, Schmidt F, et al. Blood pressure-independent effects in rats with human renin and angiotensinogen genes. Hypertension. . 2000; 35: 587–594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. de Gasparo M, Catt KJ, Inagami T, et al. International union of pharmacology, 23: the angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev. . 2000; 52: 415–472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Mai M, Geiger H, Hilgers KF, et al. Early interstitial changes in hypertension-induced renal injury. Hypertension. . 1993; 22: 754–765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Hilgers KF, Hartner A, Porst M, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage infiltration in hypertensive kidney injury. Kidney Int. . 2000; 58: 2408–2419.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Yoshimura T, Takeya M, Takahashi K. Molecular cloning of rat monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and its expression in rat spleen cells and tumor cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. . 1991; 174: 504–509.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Schagger H, von Jagow G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem. . 1987; 166: 368–379.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Conlon PJ, O’Riordan E, Kalra PA. New insights into the epidemiologic and clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis. . 2000; 35: 573–587.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Anderson GH Jr, Blakeman N, Streeten DH. The effect of age on prevalence of secondary forms of hypertension in 4429 consecutively referred patients. J Hypertens. . 1994; 12: 609–615.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Zierhut W, Studer R, Laurent D, et al. Left ventricular wall stress and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase gene expression in renal hypertensive rats: dose-dependent effects of ACE inhibition and AT1-receptor blockade. Cardiovasc Res. . 1996; 31: 758–768.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Webb RL, Navarrete AE, Davis S, et al. Synergistic effects of combined converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism on blood pressure in conscious telemetered spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. . 1998; 16: 843–852.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Steen VD, Costantino JP, Shapiro AP, et al. Outcome of renal crisis in systemic sclerosis: relation to availability of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Ann Intern Med. . 1990; 113: 352–357.

16. Jackson B, Franze L, Sumithran E, et al. Pharmacologic nephrectomy with chronic angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in renovascular hypertension in the rat. J Lab Clin Med. . 1990; 115: 21–27.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Grone HJ, Warnecke E, Olbricht CJ. Characteristics of renal tubular atrophy in experimental renovascular hypertension: a model of kidney hibernation. Nephron. . 1996; 72: 243–252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Johnson RJ, Alpers CE, Yoshimura A, et al. Renal injury from angiotensin II-mediated hypertension. Hypertension. . 1992; 19: 464–474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Wolf G, Ziyadeh FN, Thaiss F, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates expression of the chemokine RANTES in rat glomerular endothelial cells: role of the angiotensin type 2 receptor. J Clin Invest. . 1997; 100: 1047–1058.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Mai M, Hilgers KF, Geiger H. Experimental studies on the role of ICAM-1 and LFA-1 in hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Hypertension. . 1996; 28: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Eng E, Veniant M, Floege J, et al. Renal proliferative and phenotypic changes in rats with two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt hypertension. Am J Hypertens. . 1994; 7: 177–185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Capers Q IV, Alexander RW, Lou P, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in aortic tissues of hypertensive rats. Hypertension. . 1997; 30: 1397–1402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Chen XL, Tummala PE, Olbrych MT, et al. Angiotensin II induces monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. . 1998; 83: 952–959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Wolf G, Schneider A, Helmchen U, et al. AT1-receptor antagonists abolish glomerular MCP-1 expression in a model of mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. Exp Nephrol. . 1998; 6: 112–120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Bush E, Maeda N, Kuziel WA, et al. CC chemokine receptor 2 is required for macrophage infiltration and vascular hypertrophy in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension. . 2000; 36: 360–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Hahn AW, Jonas U, Bühler FR, et al. Activation of human peripheral monocytes by angiotensin II. FEBS Lett. . 1994; 347: 178–180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Nataraj C, Oliverio MI, Mannon RB, et al. Angiotensin II regulates cellular immune responses through a calcineurin-dependent pathway. J Clin Invest. . 1999; 104: 1693–1701.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Wada T, Yokoyama H, Furuichi K, et al. Intervention of crescentic glomerulonephritis by antibodies to monocyte chemotactic peptide (MCP-1). FASEB J. . 1996; 10: 1418–1425.[Abstract]

29. Wenzel U, Schneider A, Valente AJ, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mediates macrophage/monocyte influx in anti-thymocyte antibody-induced glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. . 1997; 51: 770–776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Boring L, Gosling J, Cleary M, et al. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2-/- mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature. . 1998; 394: 894–897.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Manhiani, J. E. Quigley, S. F. Knight, S. Tasoobshirazi, T. Moore, M. W. Brands, B. D. Hammock, and J. D. Imig
Soluble epoxide hydrolase gene deletion attenuates renal injury and inflammation with DOCA-salt hypertension
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F740 - F748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. N. Muller, B. Klanke, S. Feldt, N. Cordasic, A. Hartner, R. E. Schmieder, F. C. Luft, and K. F. Hilgers
(Pro)Renin Receptor Peptide Inhibitor "Handle-Region" Peptide Does Not Affect Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis in Goldblatt Rats
Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 676 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Xia, E. Seckin, Y. Xiang, M. Vranesic, W. B. Mathews, K. Hong, D. A. Bluemke, L. O. Lerman, and Z. Szabo
Positron-Emission Tomography Imaging of the Angiotensin II Subtype 1 Receptor in Swine Renal Artery Stenosis
Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 466 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. G. Hackam, J. D. Spence, A. X. Garg, and S. C. Textor
Role of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis and Renovascular Hypertension
Hypertension, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 998 - 1003.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. L. Graciano, C. R. Mouton, M. E. Patterson, D. M. Seth, J. J. Mullins, and K. D. Mitchell
Renal vascular and tubulointerstitial inflammation and proliferation in Cyp1a1-Ren2 transgenic rats with inducible ANG II-dependent malignant hypertension
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): F1858 - F1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Hartner, M. Porst, B. Klanke, N. Cordasic, R. Veelken, and K. F. Hilgers
Angiotensin II formation in the kidney and nephrosclerosis in Ren-2 hypertensive rats
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1778 - 1785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. A. Elmarakby, J. E. Quigley, D. M. Pollock, and J. D. Imig
Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Blockade Increases Renal Cyp2c23 Expression and Slows the Progression of Renal Damage in Salt-Sensitive Hypertension
Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 557 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Sironi, P. Gelosa, U. Guerrini, C. Banfi, V. Crippa, M. Brioschi, E. Gianazza, E. Nobili, A. Gianella, M. de Gasparo, et al.
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of AT1 Receptor Blockade Provide End-Organ Protection in Stroke-Prone Rats Independently from Blood Pressure Fall
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2004; 311(3): 989 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. Suzuki, T. Yamamoto, N. Ikegaya, and A. Hishida
Dietary salt intake modulates progression of antithymocyte serum nephritis through alteration of glomerular angiotensin II receptor expression
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): F267 - F277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Sun, J. Zhang, L. Lu, S. S. Chen, M. T. Quinn, and K. T. Weber
Aldosterone-Induced Inflammation in the Rat Heart : Role of Oxidative Stress
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 161(5): 1773 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. F. Hilgers and J. F. E. Mann
ACE Inhibitors versus AT1 Receptor Antagonists in Patients with Chronic Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2002; 13(4): 1100 - 1108.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilgers, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. F.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hilgers, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. F.E.
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies