Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:1012-1016

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perry, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dell’Italia, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perry, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dell’Italia, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Echocardiography

(Circulation. 2001;103:1012.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Genetic Variation in Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Does Not Prevent Development of Cardiac Hypertrophy or Upregulation of Angiotensin II in Response to Aortocaval Fistula

Presented at the 48th Annual Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, La, March 7–10, 1999, and published in abstract form (J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:171A).

Gilbert J. Perry, MD; Tatsuhiko Mori, MD, PhD; Chih-Chang Wei, PhD; Xiao Yan Xu, MD; Yiu-Fai Chen, PhD; Suzanne Oparil, MD; Pamela Lucchesi, PhD; Louis J. Dell’Italia, MD

From the Birmingham VA Medical Center (G.J.P., L.J.D.) and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (G.J.P., T.M., C.-C.W., X.Y.X., Y.-F.C., S.O., P.L., L.J.D.).

Correspondence to Gilbert J. Perry, MD, 700 S 19th St (111H), Birmingham, AL 35233. E-mail gilbert.perry{at}med.va.gov


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that angiotensin II may be an important mediator of cardiac hypertrophy in response to hemodynamic stress. We investigated the effect of genetic variation in angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) on the development of cardiac hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in response to volume overload.

Methods and Results—Male heterozygous ACE knockout (1/0) and wild-type (1/1) mice were studied 4 weeks after the creation of an aortocaval fistula (ACF). The LV weight/body weight ratio increased 74% in ACF versus sham-operated control mice but did not differ between genotypes. Echocardiographic circumferential stress versus rate-corrected velocity of circumferential shortening curves demonstrated depressed LV function in ACF versus sham-operated mice but no difference between genotypes. LV ACE activity was higher in 1/1 versus 1/0 mice and in ACF versus sham-operated mice, and it increased significantly more in the 1/1 versus the 1/0 mice after ACF (P<0.001 for effect of genotype, ACF/sham operation, and interaction term). LV angiotensin II was higher in ACF versus sham-operated mice but did not differ between genotypes, despite 3-fold higher LV ACE activity in ACF 1/1 versus ACF 1/0 mice.

Conclusions—ACE underexpression does not prevent cardiac hypertrophy or LV dysfunction in response to volume overload. LV angiotensin II is unaffected by ACE genotype, both at baseline and after volume overload, indicating that the heart can maintain angiotensin II levels across a broad range of genetic ACE variation under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions.


Key Words: hypertrophy • angiotensin • fistula • genes


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Recent studies suggest that locally produced angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin I (Ang I) to angiotensin II (Ang II) as well as the degradation of bradykinin and other biologically active peptides,1 may be a critical component in the signal transduction linking hemodynamic stress and cardiac remodeling. Cardiac ACE activity is upregulated and correlates with the degree of hypertrophy in volume- and pressure-overload models of congestive heart failure (CHF) in the rat2 3 4 and with diastolic wall stress in mitral regurgitation in the dog.5 Both clinical and experimental studies demonstrate a favorable impact of ACE inhibitor therapy on the progressive remodeling and ventricular dysfunction of CHF.6 7 8 Additionally, genotypes linked to high ACE activity have been associated with adverse outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathy9 and post–myocardial infarction remodeling.10 Thus, either pharmacological or genetic downregulation of ACE slows the development and progression of CHF of diverse causes. The mechanism whereby genetic variation in ACE confers clinical benefit remains unknown, inasmuch as blood pressure is unaffected, and it is uncertain whether the range of ACE variation observed is sufficient to alter tissue Ang II. Transgenic mice demonstrating variation of ACE activity have recently been developed, providing a unique opportunity to study the effect of genetic variation of ACE activity on cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in response to experimental CHF.11 Heterozygous ACE knockout mice (1/0) demonstrate 50% of normal plasma and tissue ACE activity but show no difference in blood pressure compared with 1/1 wild-type mice.12 13 We hypothesized that 1/0 mice would develop less cardiac hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in response to an aortocaval fistula (ACF).


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Generation of Transgenic Mice
F2 transgenic mice (strain 129xC57BL/6J) heterozygous for an insertional disruption of exon 14 of the ACE gene were provided by Dr Oliver Smithies and Dr John Krege11 (Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill). Male 1/1 and 1/0 offspring bred at the University of Alabama at Birmingham animal research center were used for the present investigation. Mice were provided chow (Teklad LM-485 sterilizable mouse diet) and water ad libitum and were maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Experiments were approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were consistent with the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academic Press, revised 1996). From mice aged 6 to 8 weeks, a tail specimen was obtained for determination of ACE genotype by Southern restriction analysis.11 The DNA fragment containing the mutant (nonfunctional) ACE gene fragment contains an insertion of a 1.8-kb Neo gene and thus migrates to 8.5 rather than 6.7 kb. Genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme BamHI, separated by electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels, and blotted onto Nytran plus membranes (0.45 µm, Schleicher & Schuell). [{alpha}-32P]dCTP ACE 12-T probes were used to detect the normal and mutated ACE gene fragments.

Creation of ACF
Mice underwent sham or ACF surgery at 10 to 14 weeks of age. With mice under sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg IP) anesthesia, the abdominal cavity was opened via a midline incision. The inferior vena cava and aorta were exposed, gently separated, and clamped distal to the renal vasculature. A 2-mm side-to-side anastomosis between the inferior vena cava and aorta was made with a 30-gauge disposal needle and scissors, and 10-0 Dermalon suture (American Cyanamid Co). Shunt patency was verified visually by swelling of the inferior vena cava and by mixing of arterial and venous blood. The peritoneal cavity was closed with 5-0 Chromic gut stitches (Ethicon, Inc), and the skin was closed with metallic clips.

Echocardiographic Assessment of LV Size and Function
Echocardiography with simultaneous monitoring of arterial pressure was performed 4 weeks after surgery. Under tribromoethanol anesthesia (375 mg/kg IP), the left carotid artery was exposed and cannulated with a polyethylene cannula (PE-10 fused to PE-50 tubing, Becton Dickinson) containing 10 U/mL heparinized saline. The catheter was exteriorized to the posterior neck and fixed with dental acrylic (Dental Manufacturing Co). Arterial pressure was recorded on a Biopak MP100 (Biopac Systems, Inc) with output to a PC sampling at 100 Hz, with use of AcqKnowledge software. LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD), and septal and posterior wall diastolic thickness (PW) were measured by 2D guided M-mode echocardiography from the parasternal long-axis view by using a 10- to 12.5-MHz vascular probe (ATL 5000 HDI, ATL). The echocardiographer was blinded to genotype and the presence or absence of a fistula. The high-definition zoom feature was used to maximize the area of interest, allowing online measurement of LV dimensions. Ejection time (EjT) and RR interval were measured from pulsed Doppler of LV outflow at the aortic valve level. Echocardiographic LV mass was calculated from the cube formula.14 LV wall thickness/diameter ratio was calculated as 2xPW/LVEDD. LV systolic chamber function was assessed from the rate-corrected velocity of circumferential shortening (VCFr)15 : VCFr=(LVEDD-LVESD/LVEDD)/(EjT-RR0.5).

Circumferential systolic stress (Circ stress, mm Hg) was calculated as follows16 :

where P is pressure, and PWS is systolic PW. We used mean arterial pressure (MAP) for P, because MAP correlates closely with end-systolic pressure17 and is more accurately measured by fluid-filled catheters in the mouse than peak or end-systolic pressure because of the very rapid heart rate. VCFr was normalized to circumferential stress by comparison with a stress-VCFr curve generated by linear regression of VCFr versus circumferential stress in 17 sham-operated mice (FigureDown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Relation of VCFr and circumferential stress in 17 sham-operated 1/1 control mice. To correct for variations in circumferential stress between mice, observed VCFr was compared with VCFr predicted from regression (Reg.) line for that level of circumferential stress to yield VCFdif. B, VCFdif was calculated for each mouse. VCFdif for each group (ACF 1/1, ACF 1/0, sham-operated 1/1, and sham-operated 1/0 mice) was calculated as sum of VCFdif of all mice in that group.

Quantification of Shunt Size
We semiquantified shunt severity by injecting 15.5-µm colored microspheres, designed to lodge in the capillary microcirculation,18 into the descending thoracic aorta and by measuring deposition in the lungs. Blue 15±0.43-µm colored microspheres (Triton Technology) were diluted to a final concentration of 750 000 microspheres/mL (first 10 mice) or 300 000 microspheres/mL (last 30 mice) in normal saline containing 0.01% Tween 80. With the use of a glass syringe, 100 µL was injected into the aortic arch via the indwelling cannula in the left common carotid artery, immediately after the echocardiographic study was completed. After euthanasia, the lungs were removed, weighed, and processed for microsphere recovery per the manufacturer’s directions. Briefly, tissue was digested overnight in 4 mol/L KOH containing 0.05% Tween 80. The digest was then vortexed and vacuum-filtered. The filter was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and 100 µm dimethylformamide was added to break the microspheres. The solution was vortexed for 30 seconds, followed by centrifugation at 2000g for 3 minutes. The absorption of the solution at 672 nm was determined by spectrophotometry (Beckman DU 650) and compared with standard curves to determine the number of microspheres. Lung uptake of microspheres was normalized to the total number of microspheres injected. Lung microsphere recovery was 0.8±0.08% (range 0.3% to 1.0%) in sham-operated control mice (n=12), reflecting bronchial circulation, versus 29±4% (range 1% to 74%) in ACF mice (n= 28), validating the concept of using microspheres to confirm shunt patency. Three of the above ACF mice had <3% microsphere recovery in the lungs. These mice had no cardiac hypertrophy, were presumed to have no significant ACF, and were excluded from further analysis.

Cardiac ACE and Chymase Activity
At the completion of the echocardiographic study and microsphere injection, mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation. The heart was immediately excised, blotted dry, and placed on an iced Petri dish. The ventricles were separated and weighed, and the LV was immediately placed on dry ice. ACE tissue activity was measured by using the artificial substrate hippuryl-His-Leu as previously described.19 Chymase activity was assayed by using a modification of the procedure of Urata et al,20 as previously reported by our laboratory.21

Cardiac Angiotensin Peptide Levels
To avoid anesthesia, which might acutely affect LV Ang II levels, cardiac Ang II was measured in a separate group of mice that did not undergo echocardiographic or shunt quantification before euthanasia. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation without any preceding anesthesia. The heart was rapidly excised, and the LV was immediately separated, weighed, and placed on dry ice. Cardiac angiotensin peptide concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay, as previously described.22 Two hundred milligrams of tissue was necessary to ensure sufficient tissue for LV angiotensin peptide analysis, necessitating the pooling of 1 or 2 ACF or 3 or 4 sham-operated LVs for each measurement.

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Differences between ACF and sham-operated groups for 1/1 and 1/0 genotypes were evaluated by 2-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were performed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test where appropriate. Correlations between continuous parameters of interest were determined from linear regression. Power estimates for the 2-way ANOVA interaction term to detect a 20% difference (ACF 1/1 versus ACF 1/0) in the LV weight/body weight (BW) ratio, VCFr, and the difference between observed and predicted VCFr (VCFdif) and a 25% difference in Ang II were calculated retrospectively on the basis of sample size and observed standard deviation. All statistics were calculated by using SigmaStat statistical software (Jandel Scientific). Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of ACE Genotype on Development of Cardiac Hypertrophy and LV Dysfunction
Shunt patency at the time of hemodynamic study and euthanasia was confirmed in all mice either by microspheres (n=25) or by significant cardiac hypertrophy (n=5). There was no significant difference in lung microsphere recovery between the 1/0 and 1/1 genotypes, indicating similar degrees of shunting in each group (31.2% versus 32.6%, P=NS). Lung microsphere recovery was correlated with the LV weight/BW ratio determined at autopsy, providing evidence that it reflects the degree of aortocaval shunting (r=0.58, P=0.002).

There was significant cardiac hypertrophy and an increase in the lung weight/BW ratio after ACF (TableDown). Cardiac hypertrophy and the lung weight/BW ratio increased to a similar extent in the 1/1 and 1/0 genotypes, indicating that the 1/0 ACE genotype does not prevent hypertrophy or the development of pulmonary congestion due to volume overload (power 0.81 to detect a 20% difference in LV weight/BW between ACF 1/0 and ACF 1/1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of ACF and ACE Genotype on Cardiac Size, Function, and Renin-Angiotensin System

The echocardiographic LV mass correlated well with the LV mass at euthanasia (y=1.04x-14.2; r=0.89, P<0.0001). LVEDD, LVESD, and PW all increased in response to ACF. The LV wall thickness/diameter ratio was lower in the 1/0 genotype versus the 1/1 genotype in both the sham and ACF groups, suggesting that the ACE genotype may have an effect on LV structure. However, there was no significant effect of ACE genotype on the response of any of the echocardiographic parameters of LV structure to ACF (interaction terms, TableUp.)

Heart rate and MAP were close to the expected awake values and did not differ between groups. LV systolic function was moderately depressed after ACF, as evidenced by a decreased echocardiographic VCFr in ACF versus sham-operated animals. VCFdif, which was calculated to correct for differences in wall stress between groups, was lower in ACF than in sham-operated mice, indicating that the depressed LV chamber function was not a result of altered loading conditions. There was no significant effect of ACE genotype on VCFr or VCFdif. Thus, LV function was depressed after 4 weeks of ACF, as evidenced by decreased VCFr and VCFdif and an increased lung weight/BW ratio. The 1/0 ACE genotype did not prevent the development of LV dysfunction (power 0.82 for VCFr and 0.99 for VCFdif to detect a 20% difference between ACF 1/0 and ACF 1/1).

LV ACE, Chymase, and Angiotensins
There was dramatic upregulation of LV ACE activity in response to ACF in the 1/1 mice, whereas there was very little increase in ACE activity in response to ACF in the 1/0 mice. LV chymase activity and Ang II peptide were significantly increased in ACF versus sham-operated animals but did not differ between genotypes. Importantly, LV Ang II was similarly elevated in the 1/0 and 1/1 ACF groups, despite 3-fold higher LV ACE activity in the latter (power 0.72 to detect a 25% difference in Ang II between ACF 1/0 and ACF 1/1). LV Ang I peptide did not differ between groups.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The effect of genetic variation in ACE on the response to hemodynamic stress has not previously been studied in an experimental animal preparation. On the basis of the detrimental effects of genotypes associated with high ACE activity in several human disease states and the protective effects of ACE inhibitors in multiple experimental trials, we hypothesized that genetically lower ACE activity would protect against the development of cardiac hypertrophy and LV dysfunction. To our surprise, we found that mice with only 1 functioning ACE gene developed a similar amount of cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in response to an ACF compared with mice with 2 functioning ACE genes, despite significantly lower cardiac ACE levels in the former. ACE genotype did not affect Ang II peptide levels either at baseline or in response to volume overload, indicating that the heart is capable of maintaining Ang II levels across a wide range of genetic ACE variation under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Cardiac Ang II is upregulated in both the canine mitral regurgitation and the rat ACF models of volume-overload CHF.21 The mechanisms regulating cardiac Ang II concentration remain uncertain. Plasma renin activity and cardiac renin, ACE, and angiotensin type 1 mRNA are elevated after ACF in the rat,3 whereas cardiac angiotensinogen mRNA is very low and does not increase significantly after ACF.2 Cardiac ACE activity is upregulated and correlates with regional diastolic wall stress in a canine model of mitral regurgitation and with the LV weight/BW ratio in the rat after ACF.2 5 It has not been possible from these prior studies to determine whether ACE upregulation is an integral and necessary feature regulating cardiac hypertrophy and Ang II or simply a marker of hemodynamic stress. We found a similar amount of cardiac hypertrophy, depressed myocardial function, and increased lung weight in 1/0 and 1/1 ACE genotypes after ACF, despite a 3-fold difference in LV ACE activity between these groups. Thus, although local ACE is upregulated in response to volume overload, our results indicate that this is not a prerequisite for the development of LV hypertrophy, early LV dysfunction, or elevation of LV Ang II. The insensitivity of LV Ang I and II levels to variation in LV ACE indicate that ACE is not rate limiting for conversion of Ang I to Ang II in the range studied. This could be explained either by a constitutive excess of ACE or by alternate pathways for conversion of Ang I to Ang II, such as chymase.

Several points need to be considered in reconciling our findings with the multiple epidemiological and experimental trials demonstrating a beneficial effect of genetic or pharmacological ACE downregulation on outcomes in CHF.2 3 4 7 8 9 10 The mechanism by which ACE inhibitors are efficacious is uncertain and may vary depending on the underlying pathophysiology. Quinapril, an ACE inhibitor with high affinity for cardiac ACE, decreased cardiac hypertrophy and Ang II after ACF in the rat, whereas enalapril, which has a lower affinity for cardiac ACE, suppressed neither hypertrophy nor cardiac Ang II, despite the similar effects on LVEDP and systemic Ang II of the 2 agents.6 23 These findings suggest that attenuation of volume-overload hypertrophy by ACE inhibitors requires high-level suppression of tissue ACE, and they are consistent with our findings that incomplete cardiac ACE suppression does not prevent hypertrophy or suppress cardiac Ang II upregulation due to ACF. However, the results stand in contrast to experimental animal models demonstrating the efficacy of low-dose ACE inhibitor in reversing hypertrophy from aortic banding,24 clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of nonselective ACE inhibitors, and epidemiological trials demonstrating the benefit of modest genetic variation in ACE, possibly reflecting important pathophysiological differences between experimental volume overload and the clinical states in the above trials. Patients in the major ACE inhibitor CHF trials and in the ACE genotype epidemiological studies have predominantly had coronary artery disease, hypertension, or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy as the underlying cause of CHF,9 10 conditions characterized by collagen deposition and fibrosis in the extracellular matrix of the myocardium.25 In contrast, in short-term ACF, there is no fibrosis and either no change in collagen or decreased collagen levels.26 27 Thus, the lack of a beneficial effect of low ACE genotype in the present model, as opposed to its beneficial effect in a variety of pathophysiological states in humans, may in part reflect the absence of fibrosis as an important pathophysiological feature in early ACF. Although caution must be used in extrapolating results from mice to humans because of the multiple inherent differences between the 2 species, the present study may provide useful insights into the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of genetic ACE variation in humans. Our results indicate that incomplete suppression of tissue ACE is ineffective in preventing hypertrophy and LV dysfunction due to pure volume overload. Additionally, our finding of maintained LV Ang II in the heterozygous ACE knockout mouse indicates that ACE is not rate limiting for Ang II production within the range studied and suggests that a non–Ang II mechanism may mediate the beneficial effect of low ACE genotype observed in humans.

In conclusion, mice with 1 and 2 ACE genes develop a similar amount of cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction and similar elevation of LV Ang II and chymase after ACF, despite 3-fold higher LV ACE levels in the latter. Variation in LV ACE activity within the range studied is not an important regulator of steady-state LV Ang II concentration.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grant AL-G-970028 from the American Heart Association, Alabama Affiliate (Dr Perry), by a grant from the VISTAR Corp of the Birmingham Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr Perry), and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant R01 HL-54816 (Dr Dell’Italia).

Received June 19, 2000; revision received August 25, 2000; accepted August 31, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Erdos EG, Skidgel RA. The angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Lab Invest. 1987;56:345–348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Iwai N, Shimoike H, Kinoshita M. Cardiac renin-angiotensin system in the hypertrophied heart. Circulation. 1995;92:2690–2696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Pieruzzi F, Abassi ZA, Keiser HR. Expression of renin-angiotensin system components in the heart, kidneys, and lungs of rats with experimental heart failure. Circulation. 1995;92:3105–3112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Schunkert H, Dzau VJ, Tang SS, et al. Increased rat cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme activity and mRNA expression in pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy: effects on coronary resistance, contractility, and relaxation. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:1913–1920.

5. Dell’Italia LJ, Meng QC, Balcells E, et al. Increased ACE and chymase-like activity in cardiac tissue of dogs with chronic mitral regurgitation. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H2065–H2073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Ruzicka M, Leenen FH. Relevance of blockade of cardiac and circulatory angiotensin-converting enzyme for the prevention of volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation. 1995;91:16–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669–677.[Abstract]

8. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:292–302.

9. Andersson B, Sylven C. The DD genotype of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene is associated with increased mortality in idiopathic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:162–167.[Abstract]

10. Pinto YM, Wiek HVG, Kingma H, et al. Deletion-type allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene is associated with progressive ventricular dilation after acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1622–1626.[Abstract]

11. Krege JH, John SWM, Langenbach LL, et al. Male-female differences in fertility and blood pressure in ACE-deficient mice. Nature. 1995;375:146–148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Tian B, Meng QC, Chen Y, et al. Blood and cardiovascular homeostasis in mice having reduced or absent angiotensin-converting enzyme gene function. Hypertension. 1997;30:128–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Krege JH, Kim HS, Moyer JS, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene mutations, blood pressures, and cardiovascular homeostasis. Hypertension. 1997;29:150–157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Manning W, Wei J, Katz S, et al. In vivo assessment of LV mass in mice using high-frequency cardiac ultrasound: necropsy validation. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1672–H1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Colan SD, Borow KM, Neumann A. Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of fiber shortening relation: a load-independent index of myocardial contractility. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:715–724.[Abstract]

16. Gaasch WH, Battle WE, Oboler AA, et al. Left ventricular stress and compliance in man with special reference to normalized ventricular function curves. Circulation. 1972;45:746–762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Rozich J, Carabello B, Usher B, et al. Mitral valve replacement with and without chordal preservation in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms for differences in postoperative ejection performance. Circulation. 1992;86:1718–1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Prinzen FW, Glenny RW. Developments in non-radioactive microsphere technique for measurement of regional organ perfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1467–1475.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Meng QC, Balcells E, Dell’Italia L, et al. Sensitive method for quantitation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity in tissue. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995;50:1445–1450.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Urata H, Boehm KD, Philip A, et al. Cellular localization and regional distribution of an angiotensin II-forming chymase in the heart. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1269–1281.

21. Dell’Italia LJ, Balcells E, Meng QC, et al. Volume-overload cardiac hypertrophy is unaffected by ACE inhibitor treatment in dogs. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H961–H970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Meng QC, Durand J, Chen Y, et al. Sensitive method for quantification of angiotensin peptides in tissue. J Chromatogr. 1993;614:19–25.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Ruzicka M, Yuan B, Harmsen E, et al. The renin-angiotensin system and volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats: effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor versus angiotensin II receptor blocker. Circulation. 1993;87:921–930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Linz W, Scholkens BA, Ganten D. Converting enzyme inhibition specifically prevents the development and induces regression of cardiac hypertrophy in rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1989;11:1325–1350.

25. Weber KT. Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure: a role for de novo angiotensin II generation. Circulation. 1997;96:4065–4082.[Free Full Text]

26. Ruzicka M, Keeley FW, Leenen FH. The renin-angiotensin system and volume overload-induced changes in cardiac collagen and elastin. Circulation. 1994;90:1989–1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Namba T, Tsutsui H, Tagawa H, et al. Regulation of fibrillar collagen gene expression and protein accumulation in volume-overloaded cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation. 1997;95:2448–2454. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. L. Brower, S. P. Levick, and J. S. Janicki
Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity by ACE inhibitors prevents left ventricular remodeling in a rat model of heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H3057 - H3064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Nishikimi, J. R. Hagaman, N. Takahashi, H.-S. Kim, H. Matsuoka, O. Smithies, and N. Maeda
Increased susceptibility to heart failure in response to volume overload in mice lacking natriuretic peptide receptor-A gene
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2005; 66(1): 94 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Pokharel, P. P. van Geel, U. C. Sharma, J. P.M. Cleutjens, H. Bohnemeier, X.-L. Tian, H. Schunkert, H. J.G.M. Crijns, M. Paul, and Y. M. Pinto
Increased Myocardial Collagen Content in Transgenic Rats Overexpressing Cardiac Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Is Related to Enhanced Breakdown of N-Acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro and Increased Phosphorylation of Smad2/3
Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 3129 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. Franco, Y.-F. Chen, S. Oparil, J. A. Feng, D. Wang, F. Hage, and G. Perry
Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Dose-Dependently Inhibits Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Remodeling
Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 746 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Mori, Y.-F. Chen, J. A. Feng, T. Hayashi, S. Oparil, and G. J Perry
Volume overload results in exaggerated cardiac hypertrophy in the atrial natriuretic peptide knockout mouse
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2004; 61(4): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C.-C. Wei, P. A. Lucchesi, J. Tallaj, W. E. Bradley, P. C. Powell, and L. J. Dell'Italia
Cardiac interstitial bradykinin and mast cells modulate pattern of LV remodeling in volume overload in rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H784 - H792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. M Aartsen, M. P Schuijt, A.H.J. Danser, M. J.A.P Daemen, and J. F.M Smits
The role of locally expressed angiotensin converting enzyme in cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2002; 56(2): 205 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C.-C. Wei, B. Tian, G. Perry, Q. C. Meng, Y.-F. Chen, S. Oparil, and L. J. Dell'Italia
Differential ANG II generation in plasma and tissue of mice with decreased expression of the ACE gene
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2254 - H2258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perry, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dell’Italia, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perry, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dell’Italia, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Echocardiography