Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:836-841

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundström, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lithell, H. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sundström, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lithell, H. O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Obesity
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2001;103:836.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Dyslipidemia and an Unfavorable Fatty Acid Profile Predict Left Ventricular Hypertrophy 20 Years Later

Johan Sundström, MD; Lars Lind, MD, PhD; Bengt Vessby, MD, PhD; Bertil Andrén, MD, PhD; Antti Aro, MD, PhD; Hans O. Lithell, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Public Health and Caring Sciences (J.S., B.V., H.O.L.) and Medical Sciences (L.L., B.A.), Uppsala University, Sweden, and Department of Nutrition (A.A.), KTL (National Public Health Institute), Helsinki, Finland.

Correspondence to Johan Sundström, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, PO Box 609, SE-75125 Uppsala, Sweden (Kålsängsgränd 10D, SE-75319 Uppsala, Sweden). E-mail johan.sundstrom{at}geriatrik.uu.se


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Causes other than hypertension have not previously been investigated longitudinally. The aim of the present study was to determine hemodynamic, metabolic, and psychosocial predictors at 50 years of age for the prevalence of echocardiographic LVH and geometric subtypes at age 70 by use of a large sample of men from the general population followed up for 20 years.

Methods and Results—In 1970 to 1973, all men born from 1920 to 1924 and residing in Uppsala County, Sweden, were invited to participate in a health survey aimed at identifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease. At a reinvestigation 20 years later, echocardiographic left ventricular mass index was determined in 475 subjects. A 1-SD increase in body mass index, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, fasting LDL/HDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides, or the serum cholesterol ester proportion of several saturated fatty acids or oleic acid at age 50 significantly increased the odds of having LVH at age 70 by 27% to 41%, whereas an increase in linoleic acid proportion was protective. Almost all metabolic predictors were independent of ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70.

Conclusions—Dyslipidemia and indices of a low dietary intake of linoleic acid and high intake of saturated and monounsaturated fats, as well as hypertension and obesity, at age 50 predicted the prevalence of LVH 20 years later in this prospective longitudinal cohort study, thereby suggesting that lipids may be important in the origin of LVH.


Key Words: hypertrophy • lipids • fatty acids • insulin • epidemiology


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Echocardiographically determined left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and morbidity,1 2 and an increased left ventricular relative wall thickness (RWT; wall thickness divided by ventricular diameter) also has an adverse prognosis.1 3

The cause of LVH is largely unknown. Cross-sectional studies4 5 6 have shown male sex, age, hypertension, obesity, certain valvular diseases, and previous myocardial infarction to be related to LVH or left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Heredity7 and alcohol use8 might also explain some of the variance in left ventricular mass. In a prospective study,9 average blood pressure over 30 years was associated with LVMI at follow-up. Hypertension is generally regarded as the worst culprit, as indicated by the large number of clinical trials on the subject.10 However, the variation in 24-hour blood pressure explains only 25% to 30% of the variation in left ventricular mass.11 Body size is a powerful determinant of left ventricular mass12 and may explain part of the sex difference in left ventricular mass.13 Weight reduction has been shown to decrease LVMI in overweight hypertensive patients even more than pharmacological antihypertensive treatment.14

Associations have recently been found15 16 17 between LVH and the insulin resistance syndrome.18 The left ventricular geometric correlates of insulin resistance are not clear; some studies16 17 19 20 have found insulin resistance or impaired glucose tolerance to be more closely related to thick left ventricular walls or increased RWT than to LVH.

The fatty acid composition of serum cholesterol esters (CEs) mainly reflects dietary fat quality over the previous 2 weeks21 and has been shown to predict myocardial infarction,22 but its relationship to LVH is not known. Furthermore, the relationships between smoking or other psychosocial factors and later LVH are not known.

Thus, there is a need for prospective studies of modifiable predictors of LVH. The aim of the present study was to determine hemodynamic, metabolic, dietary, and psychosocial predictors at age 50 years for the prevalence of echocardiographic LVH and left ventricular geometric subtypes at age 70 years by use of a large, regionally determined sample of men from the general population followed up for 20 years.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In 1970 to 1973, all men born from 1920 to 1924 and residing in Uppsala County were invited to participate in a health survey23 aimed at identifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Of the invited subjects, 2322 (82%) participated. At a reinvestigation of the cohort 20 years later, an echocardiographic examination was made in the first 583 consecutive subjects of 1221 available. The population of the present study consisted of 475 men in whom determination of left ventricular geometry was possible.24 All subjects gave informed consent, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Uppsala University. Procedures followed were in accordance with department guidelines.

Investigations at Age 50
These investigations have been described previously.23 Blood pressure in the recumbent position was measured with a mercury manometer, and radial pulse rate was counted. All blood samples were drawn in the morning after an overnight fast. Blood glucose, serum insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol were measured, and LDL cholesterol was calculated with Friedewald’s formula. The CE proportions of fatty acids (14:0 to 22:6 {omega}3) were determined by gas chromatography.22 No dietary records were obtained, but in other population studies in middle-aged men in the 1970s in Sweden, intake of fat corresponded to {approx}40%, of carbohydrates to 45% to 50%, and of protein to 13% to 15% of energy intake. The estimated intake of saturated fats corresponded to 17% to 18% of energy intake. At age 70, 7-day dietary records in 444 of the 475 subjects showed an intake of fat corresponding to 35%, of carbohydrates to 48%, and of protein to 16% of energy intake, which was comparable to other contemporary Swedish populations of the same age.

A questionnaire covered level of physical activity (4 categories) and education (5 categories). Coding of smoking (smoker, nonsmoker, ex-smoker), civil status, and socioeconomic status (3 social classes, Central Bureau of Statistics) was based on interview reports.23

Investigations at Age 70
At age 70, 167 subjects were regularly using antihypertensive medication, and 38 used lipid-lowering drugs, of whom 16 used statins, 15 fibrates, 6 resins, and 2 nicotinic acid, as monotherapy or in combination. Fifty-four subjects had been hospitalized owing to ischemic heart disease (ICD-9 codes 410 to 414) between the investigations at 50 and 70 years of age. Seventeen subjects had significant echocardiographic valvular disease (aortic or mitral stenosis or regurgitation grades 3 or 4).

A comprehensive 2D and Doppler echocardiography examination was performed as described previously.24 Left ventricular mass was divided by body surface area to obtain LVMI. LVH was defined as an LVMI >=150 g/m2 according to data from the Framingham Heart Study,25 and a partition value of 0.4426 was used for RWT [(interventricular septum+posterior wall thickness)/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter]. Thus, left ventricular geometry was considered normal if RWT was <0.44 and LVMI was <150 g/m2. A normal LVMI with increased RWT was denoted concentric remodeling,26 and a hypertrophic left ventricle was denoted eccentric if the RWT was normal and concentric if the RWT was increased.

Statistical Analysis
Variables with a skewed distribution (fasting serum insulin, triglycerides, LDL/HDL cholesterol, and CE proportion of palmitoleic, stearic, {gamma}-linolenic, {alpha}-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic, and docosahexaenoic acids) were logarithmically transformed to achieve normal distribution, and these transformed variables were used in all analyses. Logistic regression was used with LVH or increased RWT at age 70 as outcome variables and standardized continuous variables (mean=0, SD=1) or indicator variables for multilevel nominal variables at age 50 as explanatory variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for possible confounders, which were treated as dichotomous variables. Squared terms and interaction terms were tested in all regressions. ANOVA was used to calculate differences in means between left ventricular geometric subgroups and factorial ANOVA to adjust for possible confounders. Post hoc Bonferroni-adjusted comparisons were only performed if overall ANOVA was significant. A {chi}2 test was used to evaluate differences in nominal variables between geometric subgroups. Two-tailed significance values were given with P<0.05 regarded as significant. Stata 6.0 software was used (Stata Corporation).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Prediction of LVH
The prevalence of LVH at age 70 was 28% in the present cohort. Among the variables associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, a 1-SD increase in body mass index, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, fasting LDL/HDL cholesterol, or serum triglycerides at age 50 resulted in 27% to 41% increased odds of having LVH at age 70 (Table 1Down). A 1-SD increase in the CE proportion of any of myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0), stearic (18:0), oleic (18:1), or eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 {omega}3) at age 50 increased the odds of having LVH at age 70 by 29% to 37%, whereas a 1-SD increase in the proportion of linoleic acid (18:2 {omega}6) at age 50 reduced the odds of having LVH at age 70 by 24% (Table 1Down). Levels of physical activity, education, smoking, civil status, and socioeconomic status at age 50, crude or adjusted, were not associated with later LVH (data not shown). With simultaneous control for ischemic heart disease during follow-up, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70, the adjusted odds ratios were similar to the crude odds ratios, but systolic and diastolic blood pressure and palmitic acid were no longer significantly associated with LVH (Table 1Down). With control also for body mass index at age 50, LDL/HDL cholesterol and proportions of stearic, oleic, linoleic, and eicosapentaenoic acids remained significant predictors of LVH.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. ORs for Having LVH at Age 70 for a 1-SD Increase in a Variable at Age 50

Prediction of Increased Left Ventricular RWT
The prevalence of increased RWT at age 70 was 25% in the present cohort. A 1-SD increase in CE proportion of oleic acid (18:1), {gamma}-linolenic acid (18:3 {omega}6), or dihomo-{gamma}-linolenic acid (20:3 {omega}6) at age 50 increased the odds of having increased RWT at age 70 by 28% to 32%, whereas a 1-SD increase in the proportion of linoleic acid (18:2 {omega}6) at age 50 reduced the odds of having increased RWT at age 70 by 26% (Table 2Down). The studied psychosocial issues were not associated with increased RWT (data not shown). Controlling for ischemic heart disease during follow-up, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70 gave results similar to the unadjusted analysis (Table 2Down). When body mass index at age 50 was also controlled for, proportions of oleic and linoleic acid remained significantly associated with increased RWT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. ORs for Having Increased Left Ventricular RWT at Age 70 for a 1-SD Increase in a Variable at Age 50

We reperformed all the above analyses in a subsample of 421 subjects without ischemic heart disease during follow-up. In logistic regression analysis with LVH at age 70 as the dependent variable, adjusted for valvular disease and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70, significant predictors were the same as when adjusted for ischemic heart disease during follow-up in the total sample, with the addition of total cholesterol and the exception of myristic acid (14:0). When increased RWT was used as dependent variable, only dihomo-{gamma}-linolenic acid (20:3 {omega}6) was significant in the ischemic heart disease–free subsample.

In the total sample, when also adjusting for use of lipid-lowering drugs at age 70 (adjusting for antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, and valvular disease at age 70 and ischemic heart disease during follow-up), the effect of triglycerides (P=0.055) and LDL/HDL cholesterol (P=0.063) on later LVH became of borderline significance, but body mass index and CE proportions of fatty acids 14:0, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2 {omega}6, and 20:5 {omega}3 remained significant, and the CE proportion of docosahexaenoic acid (22:6 {omega}3) became significantly directly related to later LVH. Regarding prediction of later increased RWT, the same adjustment made oleic acid lose significance, but other predictors remained significant.

Characteristics at Age 50 According to Left Ventricular Geometric Patterns at Age 70
The levels of several variables associated with the insulin resistance syndrome and CE proportions of several fatty acids determined at age 50 varied significantly between the 4 left ventricular geometry groups determined at age 70 (Table 3Down). In the concentric remodeling group, CE proportions of oleic (18:1) and {gamma}-linolenic acid (18:3 {omega}6) were significantly higher and the proportion of linoleic acid (18:2 {omega}6) was significantly lower than in the normal geometry group. In the concentric LVH group, diastolic blood pressure and CE proportions of myristic (14:0), palmitic (16:0), oleic (18:1), and eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 {omega}3) were significantly higher and linoleic acid (18:2 {omega}6) was significantly lower than in the normal geometry group. In the eccentric LVH group, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting serum triglycerides, and CE proportions of oleic (18:1) and eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 {omega}3) were significantly higher, and linoleic acid (18:2 {omega}6) was significantly lower than in the normal geometry group. The studied psychosocial factors did not vary between the left ventricular geometry groups (data not shown). With simultaneous control for ischemic heart disease during follow-up and for valvular disease and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70, differences between groups regarding proportions of oleic, linoleic, {gamma}-linolenic, and eicosapentaenoic acids were still significant, whereas other differences lost significance. When body mass index at 50 was also controlled for, differences in oleic, linoleic, and eicosapentaenoic acids remained significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Characteristics at Age 50 According to Left Ventricular Geometric Patterns at Age 70


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this 20-year follow-up of a large, regionally determined sample of men from the general population, dyslipidemia and a CE fatty acid composition indicating a high dietary intake of saturated and monounsaturated fats and low intake of linoleic acid at age 50 predicted the prevalence of LVH at age 70 to a similar degree as hypertension and obesity. The impact of obesity, dyslipidemia, and an unfavorable fatty acid profile on LVH was independent of history of ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication at age 70. The relationships between dyslipidemia and an unfavorable fatty acid profile and later LVH were also independent of obesity at age 50. Previously, hypertension has been related to the development of LVH in a prospective study,9 but the predictive value of obesity, dyslipidemia, and indices of an unfavorable diet for LVH has never been shown.

Focus has recently turned to the association between LVH and the insulin resistance syndrome.15 16 17 19 20 Some cross-sectional population studies on the subject exist,15 19 20 but most studies have been made in small groups of hypertensive patients, which would not be ideal for the search for correlates to LVH other than hypertension. In the present study, lipid derangements, unfavorable fatty acid profile, and obesity seemed to be powerful longitudinal predictors of LVH development, in contrast to a cross-sectional analysis of the same cohort at age 70 in which several measures of glucose intolerance and insulin resistance were related to an increased RWT and concentric remodeling but less to LVH.20 The reason for these differences is not clear, but the metabolic associations may be affected by the normally observed age-related increase in RWT.27

The relationship between an unfavorable CE fatty acid composition and later LVH is important, because the fatty acid composition reflects dietary fat quality over the past couple of weeks21 and thus is a modifiable risk factor. Previous studies of the present cohort have shown that a fatty acid profile indicating a high dietary intake of saturated fats and low intake of linoleic acid is related to insulin resistance28 and predicts myocardial infarction over 19 years.22 Because the impact of other traditional risk factors on myocardial infarction22 was similar to their impact on LVH in the present study, LVH might be regarded as an intermediary risk factor on the pathway between the described risk factor profile and myocardial infarction. The apparently reciprocal effects of linoleic acid (which makes up >50% of all CE fatty acids) and the saturated fatty acids may be due to passive redistribution of the less abundant acids after changes in linoleic acid proportion occur but may also reflect true pathophysiological effects of the saturated fatty acids. In these men, the dietary source of oleic acid was not olive oil (which was not used by middle-aged men in Sweden in the early 1970s) but food groups containing a high proportion of saturated fatty acids, such as dairy products, solid margarines, and meat products. The low impact of {omega}3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are generally regarded as favorable, and the initially surprising relationship between eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 {omega}3) levels and later LVH may be because a high intake of linoleic acid–rich vegetable fats reduces {omega}3-acid levels in serum21 by a decreased conversion of {alpha}-linolenic acid (18:3 {omega}3) to eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 {omega}3) through competition for the same enzyme systems. Other factors than dietary fat intake may affect CE fatty acid profile, but the relationships between LDL/HDL cholesterol and triglycerides and later LVH support the adverse role of a diet rich in saturated fats.

No psychosocial variables were associated with development of LVH in the present study, in accordance with a cross-sectional population study15 in which exercise physical activity and smoking were not related to LVH. The present cohort has been closely monitored for 20 years and may therefore be healthier than average Swedish 70-year-old men. Thus, associations in the present study may be weaker than in the general population.

One limitation of the study is the lack of dietary records at baseline and the resulting lack of knowledge about any potential dietary certainties in the studied population, which might influence the generalizability of the findings of the present study. Other limitations of the study include absence of echocardiographic data at baseline, possible underestimation of the impact of variables with substantial measurement error or missing data, and bias due to loss to follow-up. Of course, confounding factors other than the ones for which we adjusted may also exist. Because many analyses were performed, some chance associations may have been found. This study has a limited generalizability to women and other age and ethnic groups, and further studies are needed for confirmation of these findings.

In conclusion, dyslipidemia and indices of a low dietary intake of linoleic acid and high intake of saturated and monounsaturated fats, as well as obesity and hypertension, at age 50 predicted the prevalence of LVH at age 70 in this 20-year follow-up of a large, regionally determined sample of men derived from the general population. The impact of obesity, dyslipidemia, and evidence of high dietary intake of saturated fats on LVH was independent of history of ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, and use of antihypertensive medication, indicating that lipids may be important in the origin of LVH.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council No. 5446, Trygg Hansa, Thuréus Foundation, Foundation for Geriatric Research (Stiftelsen för Geriatrisk Forskning), Geriatric Fund (Geriatriska Fonden), and Uppsala University.

Received July 20, 2000; revision received October 6, 2000; accepted October 10, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, et al. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:345–352.

2. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561–1566.[Abstract]

3. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Adverse prognostic significance of concentric remodeling of the left ventricle in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular mass. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:871–878.[Abstract]

4. Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, et al. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors: the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:7–13.

5. Hammond IW, Devereux RB, Alderman MH, et al. Relation of blood pressure and body build to left ventricular mass in normotensive and hypertensive employed adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:996–1004.[Abstract]

6. Sundstrom J, Lind L, Andren B, et al. Left ventricular geometry and function are related to electrocardiographic characteristics and diagnoses. Clin Physiol. 1998;18:463–470.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Post WS, Larson MG, Myers RH, et al. Heritability of left ventricular mass: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 1997;30:1025–1028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Manolio TA, Levy D, Garrison RJ, et al. Relation of alcohol intake to left ventricular mass: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:717–721.[Abstract]

9. Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Levy D. Influence of contemporary versus 30-year blood pressure levels on left ventricular mass and geometry: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1287–1294.[Abstract]

10. Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:95–110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Majahalme S, Turjanmaa V, Weder A, et al. Blood pressure levels and variability, smoking, and left ventricular structure in normotension and in borderline and mild hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:1110–1118.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, et al. The impact of obesity on left ventricular mass and geometry: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1991;266:231–236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, et al. Gender differences in left ventricular growth. Hypertension. 1995;26:979–983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. MacMahon SW, Wilcken DE, Macdonald GJ. The effect of weight reduction on left ventricular mass: a randomized controlled trial in young, overweight hypertensive patients. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:334–339.[Abstract]

15. Marcus R, Krause L, Weder AB, et al. Sex-specific determinants of increased left ventricular mass in the Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study. Circulation. 1994;90:928–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Lind L, Andersson PE, Andren B, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension is associated with the insulin resistance metabolic syndrome. J Hypertens. 1995;13:433–438.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Paolisso G, Galderisi M, Tagliamonte MR, et al. Myocardial wall thickness and left ventricular geometry in hypertensives: relationship with insulin. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:1250–1256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988: role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595–1607.[Abstract]

19. Ohya Y, Abe I, Fujii K, et al. Hyperinsulinemia and left ventricular geometry in a work-site population in Japan. Hypertension. 1996;27:729–734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Sundstrom J, Lind L, Nystrom N, et al. Left ventricular concentric remodeling rather than left ventricular hypertrophy is related to the insulin resistance syndrome in elderly men. Circulation. 2000;101:2595–2600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Nikkari T. Serum fatty acids and coronary heart disease in Finnish populations. Prog Lipid Res. 1986;25:437–450.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Ohrvall M, Berglund L, Salminen I, et al. The serum cholesterol ester fatty acid composition but not the serum concentration of alpha tocopherol predicts the development of myocardial infarction in 50-year-old men: 19 years follow-up. Atherosclerosis. 1996;127:65–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Hedstrand H. A study of middle-aged men with particular reference to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Ups J Med Sci Suppl. 1975;19:1–61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Andren B, Lind L, Hedenstierna G, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry in a population sample of elderly males. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:1800–1807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, et al. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:956–960.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1550–1558.[Abstract]

27. Ganau A, Saba PS, Roman MJ, et al. Ageing induces left ventricular concentric remodelling in normotensive subjects. J Hypertens. 1995;13:1818–1822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Vessby B, Tengblad S, Lithell H. Insulin sensitivity is related to the fatty acid composition of serum lipids and skeletal muscle phospholipids in 70-year-old men. Diabetologia. 1994;37:1044–1050.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
J. Sanchez-Quinones, F. Marin, V. Roldan, and G.Y.H. Lip
The impact of statin use on atrial fibrillation
QJM, November 1, 2008; 101(11): 845 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Martinelli, D. Girelli, G. Malerba, P. Guarini, T. Illig, E. Trabetti, M. Sandri, S. Friso, F. Pizzolo, L. Schaeffer, et al.
FADS genotypes and desaturase activity estimated by the ratio of arachidonic acid to linoleic acid are associated with inflammation and coronary artery disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 941 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. Warensjo, J. Sundstrom, B. Vessby, T. Cederholm, and U. Riserus
Markers of dietary fat quality and fatty acid desaturation as predictors of total and cardiovascular mortality: a population-based prospective study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2008; 88(1): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Heckbert, W. Post, G. D.N. Pearson, D. K. Arnett, A. S. Gomes, M. Jerosch-Herold, W. G. Hundley, J. A. Lima, and D. A. Bluemke
Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Relation to Left Ventricular Mass, Volume, and Systolic Function by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 8, 2006; (2006) j.jacc.2006.03.072v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. Warensjo, J. Sundstrom, L. Lind, and B. Vessby
Factor analysis of fatty acids in serum lipids as a measure of dietary fat quality in relation to the metabolic syndrome in men.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2006; 84(2): 442 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
G. Foldes, S. Vajda, Z. Lako-Futo, B. Sarman, R. Skoumal, M. Ilves, R. deChatel, I. Karadi, M. Toth, H. Ruskoaho, et al.
Distinct modulation of angiotensin II-induced early left ventricular hypertrophic gene programming by dietary fat type
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1219 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Lubos, R. Schnabel, H. J. Rupprecht, C. Bickel, C. M. Messow, S. Prigge, F. Cambien, L. Tiret, T. Munzel, and S. Blankenberg
Prognostic value of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 for cardiovascular death among patients with cardiovascular disease: results from the AtheroGene study
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 150 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T.-M. Lee, M.-S. Lin, T.-F. Chou, and N.-C. Chang
Effect of simvastatin on left ventricular mass in hypercholesterolemic rabbits
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1352 - H1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Sundstrom, J. C. Evans, E. J. Benjamin, D. Levy, M. G. Larson, D. B. Sawyer, D. A. Siwik, W. S. Colucci, P. W.F. Wilson, and R. S. Vasan
Relations of plasma total TIMP-1 levels to cardiovascular risk factors and echocardiographic measures: the Framingham heart study
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1509 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Michaelsson, H. Lithell, B. Vessby, and H. Melhus
Serum Retinol Levels and the Risk of Fracture
N. Engl. J. Med., January 23, 2003; 348(4): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Bjorklund, L. Lind, B. Vessby, B. Andren, and H. Lithell
Different Metabolic Predictors of White-Coat and Sustained Hypertension Over a 20-Year Follow-Up Period: A Population-Based Study of Elderly Men
Circulation, July 2, 2002; 106(1): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Verdecchia, C. Porcellati, G. Reboldi, R. Gattobigio, C. Borgioni, T. A. Pearson, and G. Ambrosio
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy as an Independent Predictor of Acute Cerebrovascular Events in Essential Hypertension
Circulation, October 23, 2001; 104(17): 2039 - 2044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundström, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lithell, H. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sundström, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lithell, H. O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Obesity
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Epidemiology