(Circulation. 2001;103:691.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (U.S., J.A., M.A.A.), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands, and the Departments of Cardiology (C.S., I.S., M.V., D.F., P.H.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (F.S.), University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr Ulrich Schotten, Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, University of Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands. E-mail Schotten{at}fys.unimaas.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and
ResultsForty-nine consecutive patients
submitted for mitral valve surgery were investigated. Twenty-three were
in persistent AF (
3 months); the others were in sinus rhythm. Before
extracorporal circulation, the right atrial appendage was excised.
ß-Adrenoceptors were quantified by radioligand binding, and G
proteins were quantified by Western blot analysis. The isometric
contractile response to Ca2+, isoproterenol,
Bay K8644, and the postrest potentiation of contractile force were
investigated in thin atrial trabeculae, which were also examined
histologically. The contractile force of the atrial preparations
obtained from AF patients was 75% less than that in preparations from
patients in sinus rhythm. Also, the positive inotropic effect of
isoproterenol was impaired, and Bay K8644 failed to increase atrial
contractile force. In contrast, the response to extracellular
Ca2+ was maintained, and the postrest
potentiation was preserved. ß-Adrenoceptor density and G-protein
expression were unchanged. Histological examination revealed 14% more
myolysis in the atria of AF patients.
ConclusionsAfter prolonged AF, atrial contractility was reduced by 75%. The impairment of ß-adrenergic modulation of contractile force cannot be explained by downregulation of ß-adrenoceptors or changes in G proteins. Dysfunction of the sarcoplasmic reticulum does not occur after prolonged AF. Failure of Bay K8644 to restore contractility suggests that the L-type Ca2+ channel is responsible for the contractile dysfunction. The restoration of contractile force by high extracellular Ca2+ shows that the contractile apparatus itself is nearly completely preserved after prolonged AF.
Key Words: arrhythmia contractility receptors, adrenergic, beta remodeling signal transduction.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cellular mechanisms responsible for AF-induced contractile dysfunction are still poorly understood. First, it has been thought that the electric energy applied during DC cardioversion caused "atrial stunning." 5 However, later studies have shown that contraction of the atria was also impaired after pharmacological6 and spontaneous7 cardioversion. Sustained AF has been shown to cause alterations in atrial cellular ultrastructure. Myolysis and fragmentation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum might explain the contractile dysfunction in remodeled atria.8 Prolonged rapid atrial rhythms have also been shown to cause a pronounced reduction in the L-type Ca2+ current.9 10 11 This offers an alternative explanation for the loss of contractile force in the course of prolonged AF. Tachycardia-induced changes of intracellular Ca2+ handling have been studied by Sun et al12 in canine atrial cardiomyocytes. They found that both contractility and intracellular Ca2+ transients were markedly reduced.
In the present study, we investigated the cellular mechanisms of postfibrillatory atrial contractile dysfunction in humans. In atrial trabeculae isolated from patients with and without AF, the ß-adrenergic response, the positive inotropic effect of Ca2+ and Bay K8644, and the postrest potentiation were evaluated. In addition, the most important proteins involved in the ß-adrenergic signal transduction pathway were biochemically determined.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3
months); the others were in SR. Despite a tendency for a lower cardiac
index and a higher wedge pressure in AF patients, hemodynamics did not
differ significantly between the 2 groups. AF patients more often
received Ca2+ antagonists and digitalis for
control of their ventricular rate. The patients did not receive drugs
at least 12 hours before surgery. All patients gave written informed
consent, and the study was approved by an institutional review
committee.
|
Contractility Studies
Immediately after surgical excision, right atrial
appendages were placed into Tyrodes solution (pH 7.4, gassed with 5%
CO2/95% O2). Thin
myocardial muscle bundles were prepared in parallel with the muscle
fiber direction under stereomicroscopic control. The length of the
bundles ranged between 3 and 6 mm, and the diameters were 0.45±0.03 mm
(n=55) in SR patients and 0.43±0.03 mm (n=51) in AF patients
(P=NS). They were connected to
isometric force transducers with silk threads and placed in an organ
bath filled with prewarmed (37°C) bathing solution. After an
equilibration period of 30 minutes, the muscles were stretched to a
resting tension of 1.0 mN. External field stimulation was performed
with rectangular pulses (5 ms, 5% to 10% above threshold) at a
frequency of 1 Hz. Resting tension was increased in 0.2-mN steps until
the muscle length providing maximal active force generation was reached
(Lmax, which was 5.1±0.2 mm in SR patients and
5.2±0.2 mm in AF patients;
P=NS). The resting tension at
Lmax was not different in the 2 groups
(1.80±0.04 mN [n=55] in SR patients and 1.74±0.06 mN [n=51] in AF
patients, P=NS). The muscles
were allowed to equilibrate for 30 minutes. All muscles showing a
decline of force of contraction (FC) of >5% during this period were
excluded from the study. In 20 preparations obtained from 16 patients
in SR and in 19 preparations from 13 AF patients, first a cumulative
dose-response curve of isoproterenol was determined. After
isoproterenol was washed out and baseline FC was restored, the positive
inotropic effect of Ca2+ was studied for
comparison. Another subgroup of preparations (19 bundles prepared from
16 SR patients and 16 bundles prepared from 12 AF patients) was first
exposed to 10.8 mmol/L extracellular Ca2+
followed by washout. Thereafter, Bay K8644 was cumulatively added to
the organ bath.
To study the postrest potentiation of contractile force, 1-Hz external field stimulation was interrupted for 10 seconds, and FC of the first twitch after the pause was compared with the steady-state force amplitude (16 muscle preparations from 16 patients in both patient groups).
Histological Examination
At the end of the experiments, the bundles were
examined histologically. To compare the atrial morphology with less
diseased hearts, right atrial specimens were obtained from 19 patients
undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (10 in SR, 9 in AF).
All preparations were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 90 mmol/L
KH2PO4 for 48 hours.
After postfixation with OsO4, the specimens were
dehydrated by a graded ethanol series and embedded in epoxy resin. The
sections (2 µm) were stained with
periodic acid Schiff
(PAS) and toluidine blue. Morphometric quantification was carried out
in transverse sections of each bundle by using a grid of 500
intersections as described
previously.8 At each
intersection, the cellular and extracellular structures were classified
as follows: (1) sarcomeres, (2) nuclei, (3) other intracellular
structures of cardiomyocytes (mostly glycogen), (4) extracellular
matrix, including fibroblasts and other nonmyocytes, and (5) vessels,
including perivascular cells. The content of each structure was
expressed as the percentage of all 500 measuring points. The
transnuclear cell diameter of 50 cardiomyocytes (shortest axis) was
measured with a digital imaging system (Sony CCD camera equipped with
NIH image software).
ß-Adrenoceptors
ß-Adrenoceptor density was determined by
radioligand binding as described
previously.13 Briefly, a
crude membrane preparation of the atrial tissue was incubated with
[125I]iodocyanopindolol (4 to 350 pmol/L).
After filtration through Whatman GF/C filters, the retained
radioactivity was counted in a
-counter. CGP 12177 (1 µmol/L) was
used to determine nonspecific binding. Protein content of the membrane
preparations was measured according to the method of
Bradford.14
Western Blot Analysis
To quantify G proteins, electrophoresis of homogenate
aliquots containing 80 µg protein per lane was carried out with the
use of 10% polyacrylamide
gels.13 After they were
tank-blotted, the nitrocellulose membranes were exposed to primary
antibody (antiserum AS/7 [inhibitory G protein] or RM/1 [stimulatory
G-protein], NEN Life Sciences). After they were labeled with
125I-protein A, the nitrocellulose membranes
were cut, and single band signals were quantified in a
-counter.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. For
EC50 values, 95% CIs are given. Statistical
significance was determined with the unpaired Student
t test or by 1-way ANOVA for
comparison of multiple groups. Significance of differences in
medication or sex were calculated by
2
test. A value P<0.05 was
considered to be statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In all bundles, the sarcomere content was 14% lower in AF
patients compared with SR patients
(Figure 1
, Table 2
). The amount of noncontractile material (mostly
glycogen) was nearly 2 times higher in AF patients. The extracellular
matrix constituted
40% of the muscle bundles in both groups. This
relatively high amount of extracellular matrix is consistent with
changes described as the result of mitral valve or rheumatic heart
disease.15 16 In
the additional group of patients with coronary heart disease, the
amount extracellular matrix was less
(Table 2
). However, the differences between coronary artery
disease patients in SR compared with those in AF were similar to the
observations in patients with mitral valve
disease.
|
Contractility
Single contractions at baseline conditions (37°C, 1
Hz, and 2.5 mmol/L Ca2+) of all muscle
preparations are superimposed in
Figure 2
. In trabeculae isolated from patients in SR, the
strength (FC) was 11.5 mN/mm2 (n=55, range
4.1 to 21.9 mN/mm2). In contrast, in muscle
bundles of AF patients, FC was only 3.1
mN/mm2 (n=51, range 0.9 to 7.4
mN/mm2,
P<0.01). Thus, in the atrial
myocardium of AF patients, baseline contractility was reduced by
75%. Increasing the extracellular Ca2+
concentration increased FC in SR and AF patients
(Figure 3
). However, the relative increase was more
pronounced in the AF group. As a result, at
Ca2+ concentrations
7.4 mmol/L, FC was no
longer significantly lower than in the SR group (but still slightly
below the force in the SR group). Thus, high extracellular
Ca2+ concentrations nearly overcame the
contractile dysfunction in muscle preparations of AF patients. In 31
bundles of 19 SR patients and 30 bundles of 15 AF patients, maximal FC
(Fmax) was directly compared with the
differences in sarcomere content. In AF patients, the reduction in
sarcomere content (-14%) was similar to the slight decrease in
Fmax (-15%), although the latter only nearly
reached the level of statistical significance
(P=0.069). The correlation
coefficient between sarcomere content and Fmax
was 0.89
(P<0.001).
|
|
The ß-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol exerted a
pronounced positive inotropic effect in the SR and AF groups
(Figure 4A
). However, in AF patients, the
concentration-response curve was shifted downward and to the right. FC
at the maximal isoproterenol concentration
(10-6 mol/L)
was lower in the AF group (18.3±1.8 versus 30.0±1.3
mN/mm2,
P<0.01). In the SR group, the
half-maximal positive inotropic effect of isoproterenol was reached at
2.6 (1.8 to 4.4) nmol/L (EC50). A nearly 10-fold
higher isoproterenol concentration was needed in the AF group to elicit
the half-maximal response (EC50 22 [14 to 41]
nmol/L, P<0.01). Thus, the
positive inotropic potency of isoproterenol was markedly reduced in
atrial muscle preparations from AF patients. Neither in the SR patients
nor in the AF patients did ß-blocker therapy alter the maximal
response to isoproterenol (for SR patients, 32.2±4.3
mN/mm2 [n=4, with ß-blocker] versus
29.2±1.9 mN/mm2 [n=12, no ß-blocker],
P=NS; for AF patients,
20.1±2.1 mN/mm2 [n=4, with ß-blocker]
versus 17.4±1.8 mN/mm2 [n=9, no
ß-blocker], P=NS).
Similarly, the potency of isoproterenol (EC50)
was not changed.
|
ß-Adrenergic Signaling
[125I]Iodocyanopindolol
binding experiments on atrial membrane preparations showed saturation
characteristics in SR and in AF patients
(Figure 4B
). The ß-adrenoceptor density was 58±5 fmol/mg
in the SR group (n=11) and 54±5 fmol/mg in the AF group (n=10)
(P=NS). Thus, compared with the
right atrial myocardium of 6 healthy donor hearts (81±7 fmol/mg),
right atrial ß-adrenoceptor density was reduced to a similar extent
in mitral valve disease patients in SR or AF.
Figure 4C
shows representative immunoblots of the
stimulatory and the inhibitory G protein. The antiserum AS/7 bound
specifically to a single band at 40 kDa, which represents the
Gi
-2 subunit. RM/1 was bound to a 45-kDa and
a 52-kDa protein representing 2 splicing variants of the stimulatory
G-protein
subunit.13
Neither the level of the stimulatory G protein (12 719±883 cpm/mg in
14 SR patients versus 14 676±1243 cpm/mg in 12 AF patients,
P=NS) nor the level of the
inhibitory G protein (3951±300 cpm/mg in 14 SR patients versus
3476±309 cpm/mg in 12 AF patients,
P=NS) was affected by
AF.
Loss of Effect of Bay K8644
The positive inotropic effect of Bay K8644 is
shown in
Figure 5
. In the SR group, the
Ca2+ channel agonist exerted a pronounced
positive inotropic effect. At
10-5 mol/L Bay
K8644, FC was comparable to FC at 10.8 mmol/L extracellular
Ca2+. In contrast, the response to Bay K8644
was abolished in the AF group, although these muscle preparations did
respond to an increase in extracellular Ca2+
concentration. At the highest concentration of Bay K8644
(10-5 mol/L),
FC was 4.5±1.1 mN/mm2 compared with
28.0±2.6 mN/mm2 at 10.8 mmol/L
Ca2+
(P<0.01). Treatment with
Ca2+ antagonists did not change the response
to Bay K8644 in the AF patients. In the treated patients, FC at
10-5 mol/L Bay
K8644 was 4.7±1.3 mN/mm2 (n=7) versus
4.2±1.3 mN/mm2 (n=5) in the patients who
were not treated with Ca2+ antagonists
(P=NS). Digitalis did also not
affect the response to Bay K8644.
|
Preserved Postrest Potentiation of FC
Figure 6
shows representative experiments on the postrest
potentiation of FC (rest interval 10 seconds). FC of the first postrest
twitch was markedly increased in the SR and the AF patients. Compared
with the force amplitude at steady-state conditions, the postrest FC
was equally enhanced in both patient groups (4.1±1.0
mN/mm2 [SR, n=16] versus 3.9±1.1
mN/mm2 [AF, n=16],
P=NS).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75%. The
data confirm previous observations in a dog model of
tachycardia-induced atrial contractile dysfunction in which the
systolic shortening of atrial cardiomyocytes was found to be reduced to
a similar extent.12 The
present study demonstrates that AF-induced myolysis is only of limited
importance as a cause of atrial contractile dysfunction. Instead,
downregulation and/or altered function of the L-type
Ca2+ channels seems to underlie AF-induced
atrial dysfunction.
Myolysis and AF-Induced Loss of Atrial
Contractility
In patients with chronic AF, recovery of atrial
contractile function after cardioversion may require several weeks or
months.3 Restoration of the
cellular (ultra)structure might explain such a long recovery of
contractile function.8 Indeed,
the present study shows that myolysis and replacement of sarcomeres by
glycogen was more pronounced in the trabeculae of AF patients. The same
alterations have previously been reported in the goat model of
AF,8 and it has been concluded
that the loss of sarcomeres might contribute to the delayed recovery of
atrial function after conversion to SR. However, in the latter study, a
direct relation between structural changes and the contractile function
of the atrial myocardium was not investigated. In the present study,
the loss of sarcomeres was compared with the maximal achievable FC in
the same muscle preparations to evaluate the contribution of structural
remodeling to the AF-induced atrial contractile dysfunction. At high
extracellular Ca2+ concentrations, atrial FC
was only slightly reduced in the AF group (-15%). This moderate
reduction in maximal FC corresponded to a similar reduction in
sarcomere content (-14%). There was a strong correlation between the
maximal FC and the sarcomere content of the individual muscle
preparations. Therefore, AF-induced myolysis can only partly explain
the pronounced reduction of contractility in remodeled atria. The main
mechanism of postcardioversion atrial contractile dysfunction is a
disturbed activation rather than a loss of atrial
myofilaments.
ß-Adrenergic Signaling
An important mechanism controlling myocardial force in
atrial and ventricular myocardium is the ß-adrenergic signal
transduction pathway. Our data demonstrate that in atrial myocardium of
AF patients, the positive inotropic effect of isoproterenol was
markedly reduced. Although the impaired ß-adrenergic response cannot
explain the reduced atrial contractility in vitro, it might contribute
to the atrial contractile dysfunction in vivo by blunting the positive
inotropic response to the physiological variations in sympathetic
tone.
In human failing ventricular myocardium and in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure, desensitization toward catecholamines has been shown to be due to a reduced density of the ß-adrenoceptors and an upregulation of the inhibitory G protein.17 18 19 In contrast, in the present study, atrial ß-adrenoceptor density and G-protein levels were not altered in AF patients. This indicates that the atrial contractile dysfunction after the cessation of AF is due to mechanisms different from the ventricular cardiomyopathy in heart failure or experimental tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy on the ventricular level.
Role of the L-Type
Ca2+ Channel
Because the positive inotropic effect of catecholamines
is mainly due to activation of the L-type
Ca2+ channel, we tested the hypothesis that
alterations of the Ca2+ channels were
responsible for the diminished isoproterenol effect. A reduction in
Ca2+ current has been shown to be the most
important ionic mechanism of AF-induced electrical
remodeling.9 Several studies
have demonstrated a downregulation of L-type
Ca2+ channel subunits in
AF.20 21 22
In our present study, the L-type Ca2+
channel agonist Bay K8644 failed to increase atrial FC in AF patients.
Potential explanations include changes in the number and/or function of
the L-type Ca2+ channels. Downregulation of
channel subunits is expected to reduce the positive inotropic effect of
the Ca2+ channel agonist and might have
caused the lack of response to Bay K8644. Altered function of the
channel due to changes of the phosphorylation state is a second
possibility to explain the loss of effect of Bay K8644. In failing
ventricular myocardium, the spatial relationship between the L-type
Ca2+ channel and the
Ca2+-release channel of the sarcoplasmic
reticulum is disturbed.23
This would provide a third explanation for the absence of the Bay K8644
effect. The latter possibility would also explain why the positive
inotropic effect of Bay K8644 is abolished in atrial myocardium of AF
patients, whereas Bay K8644 could partly overcome the decrease of the
Ca2+ inward current in the atrial cells of
dogs undergoing rapid atrial
pacing.9
The blunted response to Bay K8644 not only emphasizes that a change in the function and/or number of the L-type Ca2+ channels is the key to understanding post-AF atrial contractile dysfunction, it also explains why the positive inotropic effect of isoproterenol was reduced in AF patients, although ß-adrenoceptor density and G-protein levels were unaltered. Isoproterenol increases FC by increasing the Ca2+ inward current and by enhancing the Ca2+ reuptake by the Ca2+-ATPase of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SERCA). As a result of both effects, the Ca2+ load of the sarcoplasmic reticulum is increased. In atrial myocardium of AF patients, the inotropic effect of isoproterenol was reduced, which can be explained by the above-mentioned changes of the L-type Ca2+ channel. Interestingly, isoproterenol still elicits some positive inotropic effect in the atrial myocardium of AF patients. This remaining stimulatory effect is most likely due to stimulation of the Ca2+ reuptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum by SERCA, which would be consistent with our hypothesis that the function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum is preserved in the atrial myocardium of AF patients (see below). In contrast, Bay K8644, acting purely on the L-type Ca2+ channel, lacks this alternative positive inotropic mechanism and becomes ineffective in the atrial myocardium of AF patients.
No Dysfunction of the Sarcoplasmic
Reticulum
As reported in human failing ventricular myocardium and
in experimental tachycardia-induced heart
failure,24 dysfunction of the
sarcoplasmic reticulum might also contribute to the reduced atrial
contractility after the cessation of AF. Postrest potentiation of
contractile force critically depends on the ability of the sarcoplasmic
reticulum to store and release Ca2+ and
reflects the functional capacity of the sarcoplasmic
reticulum.25 In atrial
myocardium of AF patients, the postrest potentiation was fully
preserved, indicating that in fibrillating atria, FC is not limited by
the capacity of the sarcoplasmic reticulum to release and take up
Ca2+ again. This observation is in
accordance with the finding of Sun et
al,12 who reported that the
postrest potentiation was still present in atrial cardiomyocytes from
dogs with tachycardia-induced atrial contractile
dysfunction.
Limitations of the Study
Although the present study has demonstrated that in
atrial muscle bundles from AF patients, contractility is reduced by
75%, a causative relationship between AF and the atrial contractile
dysfunction has not been studied. We cannot exclude the possibility
that a common underlying factor causes both the atrial contractile
dysfunction and AF. However, the L-type Ca2+
current is the main determinant of contractile force and becomes
downregulated by AF. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that
electrical remodeling goes hand in hand with the atrial contractile
dysfunction. This hypothesis is supported by the study of Sun et
al,12 who showed that in dogs
undergoing rapid atrial pacing, the decrease in atrial contractility
follows a time course similar to the shortening of the action potential
duration and the decrease of the Ca2+ inward
current.
In all patients, the atria showed histological changes that were probably due to the underlying structural heart disease. Although the structural differences in atria from patients in AF and SR were similar to the changes found in the goat model of AF (resembling the situation in lone AF), extrapolation to AF in less diseased hearts should be performed with great caution. Further studies on atrial preparations from patients with lone AF would certainly be worthwhile.
A further limitation concerns the heterogeneity of our study population. Digitalis and Ca2+ antagonists were more frequently taken by the AF patients, and some patients from our study population were on ß-blockers. The subgroup analysis revealed that drug treatment did not change contractile force and the response to positive inotropes in the atrial muscle preparations. Thus, although we cannot exclude the possibility that differences in medication might have influenced the contractile behavior of the muscle preparations, the marked differences in atrial contractility between SR and AF patients could not be explained by differences in drug therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 31, 2000; revision received September 27, 2000; accepted September 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Shapiro EP, Effron MB, Lima S, et al. Transient atrial dysfunction after conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:12021207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Manning WJ, Silverman DI, Katz SE, et al. Impaired left atrial mechanical function after cardioversion: relation to the duration of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:15351540.[Abstract]
4.
Black IW, Fatkin D,
Sagar KB, et al. Exclusion of atrial thrombus by transesophageal
echocardiography does not preclude embolism after cardioversion of
atrial fibrillation: a multicenter study.
Circulation. 1994;89:25092513.
5. Fatkin D, Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: evidence for "atrial stunning" as a mechanism of thromboembolic complications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:307316.[Abstract]
6. Dethy M, Chassat C, Roy D, et al. Doppler echocardiographic predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:723726.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Grimm RA, Leung DY, Black IW, et al. Left atrial appendage "stunning" after spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation demonstrated by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1995;130:174176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Ausma J, Wijffels M,
Thoné F, et al. Structural changes of atrial myocardium due to
sustained atrial fibrillation in the goat.
Circulation. 1997;96:31573163.
9.
Yue L, Feng J, Gaspo
R, et al. Ionic remodeling underlying action potential changes in a
canine model of atrial fibrillation. Circ
Res. 1997;81:512525.
10.
Bosch RF, Zeng XR,
Grammer JB, et al. Ionic mechanisms of electrical remodeling in human
atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc
Res. 1999;44:121131.
11.
Van Wagoner DR,
Pond AL, Lamorgese M, et al. Atrial L-type
Ca2+-currents and human atrial fibrillation.
Circ Res. 1999;85:428436.
12.
Sun H, Gaspo R,
Leblanc N, et al. Cellular mechanisms of atrial contractile dysfunction
caused by sustained atrial tachycardia.
Circulation. 1998;98:719727.
13.
Schotten U,
Filzmaier K, Borghardt B, et al. Changes of the ß-adrenergic signal
transduction in compensated human cardiac hypertrophy depend on the
underlying disease. Am J
Physiol. 2000;278:H2076H2083.
14. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Boyden PA, Tilley LP, Pham TD, et al. Effects of left atrial enlargement on atrial transmembrane potentials and structure in dogs with mitral valve fibrosis. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:18961908.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Pham TD, Fenoglio JJ Jr. Right atrial ultrastructure in chronic rheumatic heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 1982;1:289304.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Bristow MR, Ginsburg R, Minobe W, et al. Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and beta-adrenergic-receptor density in failing human hearts. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:205211.[Abstract]
18. Feldman AM, Cates AE, Veazey WB, et al. Increase of the 40,000-mol wt pertussis toxin substrate (G-protein) in the failing human heart. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:189197.
19.
Marzo KP, Frey MJ,
Wilson JR, et al. Beta-adrenergic receptor-G-protein-adenylate cyclase
complex in experimental canine congestive heart failure produced by
rapid ventricular pacing. Circ
Res. 1991;69:15461556.
20.
Brundel BJJM, Van
Gelder IC, Henning RH, et al. Gene expression of proteins influencing
the calcium homeostasis in patients with persistent and paroxysmal
atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc
Res. 1999;42:443454.
21. Van Gelder IC, Brundel BJ, Henning RH, et al. Alterations in gene expression of proteins involved in the calcium handling in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:552560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Gaspo R, Sun H,
Fareh S, et al. Dihydropyridine and beta-adrenergic receptor binding in
dogs with tachycardia-induced atrial fibrillation.
Cardiovasc Res. 1999;42:434442.
23.
Gomez AM, Valdivia
HH, Cheng H, et al. Defective excitation-contraction coupling in
experimental cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.
Science. 1997;276:800806.
24.
Mittmann C,
Eschenhagen T, Scholz H. Cellular and molecular aspects of contractile
dysfunction in heart failure. Cardiovasc
Res. 1998;39:267275.
25. Bers DM. Ca-influx and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca-release in cardiac muscle activation during postrest recovery. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:H366H381.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Lenaerts, V. Bito, F. R. Heinzel, R. B. Driesen, P. Holemans, J. D'hooge, H. Heidbuchel, K. R. Sipido, and R. Willems Ultrastructural and Functional Remodeling of the Coupling Between Ca2+ Influx and Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Release in Right Atrial Myocytes From Experimental Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Circ. Res., October 23, 2009; 105(9): 876 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dinanian, C. Boixel, C. Juin, J.-S. Hulot, A. Coulombe, C. Rucker-Martin, N. Bonnet, B. Le Grand, M. Slama, J.-J. Mercadier, et al. Downregulation of the calcium current in human right atrial myocytes from patients in sinus rhythm but with a high risk of atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1190 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mayr, S. Yusuf, G. Weir, Y.-L. Chung, U. Mayr, X. Yin, C. Ladroue, B. Madhu, N. Roberts, A. De Souza, et al. Combined metabolomic and proteomic analysis of human atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 585 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Grubitzsch, A. Menes, D. Modersohn, and W. Konertz The Role of Atrial Remodeling for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 474 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-R. Neuberger, C. Mewis, D. J. van Veldhuisen, U. Schotten, I. C. van Gelder, M. A. Allessie, and M. Bohm Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2568 - 2577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Carnes, P. M. L. Janssen, M. L. Ruehr, H. Nakayama, T. Nakayama, H. Haase, J. A. Bauer, M. K. Chung, I. M. Fearon, A. M. Gillinov, et al. Atrial Glutathione Content, Calcium Current, and Contractility J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28063 - 28073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Voigt, A. Friedrich, M. Bock, E. Wettwer, T. Christ, M. Knaut, R. H. Strasser, U. Ravens, and D. Dobrev Differential phosphorylation-dependent regulation of constitutively active and muscarinic receptor-activated IK,ACh channels in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2007; 74(3): 426 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schotten, S. de Haan, S. Verheule, E. G.A. Harks, D. Frechen, E. Bodewig, M. Greiser, R. Ram, J. Maessen, M. Kelm, et al. Blockade of atrial-specific K+-currents increases atrial but not ventricular contractility by enhancing reverse mode Na+/Ca2+-exchange Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2007; 73(1): 37 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Haan, M. Greiser, E. Harks, Y. Blaauw, A. van Hunnik, S. Verheule, M. Allessie, and U. Schotten AVE0118, Blocker of the Transient Outward Current (Ito) and Ultrarapid Delayed Rectifier Current (IKur), Fully Restores Atrial Contractility After Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation in the Goat Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1234 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. El-Armouche, P. Boknik, T. Eschenhagen, L. Carrier, M. Knaut, U. Ravens, and D. Dobrev Molecular Determinants of Altered Ca2+ Handling in Human Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 670 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Boos, R. A. Anderson, and G. Y.H. Lip Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder? Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 136 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Falk Rate Control Is Preferable to Rhythm Control in the Majority of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, June 14, 2005; 111(23): 3141 - 3150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Barth, S. Merk, E. Arnoldi, L. Zwermann, P. Kloos, M. Gebauer, K. Steinmeyer, M. Bleich, S. Kaab, M. Hinterseer, et al. Reprogramming of the Human Atrial Transcriptome in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Expression of a Ventricular-Like Genomic Signature Circ. Res., May 13, 2005; 96(9): 1022 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Vest, X. H.T. Wehrens, S. R. Reiken, S. E. Lehnart, D. Dobrev, P. Chandra, P. Danilo, U. Ravens, M. R. Rosen, and A. R. Marks Defective Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor Regulation During Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2025 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Arts, T. Delhaas, P. Bovendeerd, X. Verbeek, and F. W. Prinzen Adaptation to mechanical load determines shape and properties of heart and circulation: the CircAdapt model Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1943 - H1954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Christ, P. Boknik, S. Wohrl, E. Wettwer, E.M. Graf, R.F. Bosch, M. Knaut, W. Schmitz, U. Ravens, and D. Dobrev L-Type Ca2+ Current Downregulation in Chronic Human Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Increased Activity of Protein Phosphatases Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2651 - 2657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Palin, R. Kailasam, and C. W. Hogue Jr Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: Pathophysiology and Treatment Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 175 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L.J.L. Thijssen, J. Ausma, L. Gorza, H. M.W. van der Velden, M. A. Allessie, I. C. Van Gelder, M. Borgers, and G. J.J.M. van Eys Troponin I Isoform Expression in Human and Experimental Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, August 17, 2004; 110(7): 770 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shi, H. Wang, B. Yang, D. Xu, and Z. Wang The M3 Receptor-mediated K+ Current (IKM3), a Gq Protein-coupled K+ Channel J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 21774 - 21778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Boldt, U Wetzel, J Lauschke, J Weigl, J Gummert, G Hindricks, H Kottkamp, and S Dhein Fibrosis in left atrial tissue of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 400 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Todd, S. P. Fynn, A. P. Walden, W. J. Hobbs, S. Arya, and C. J. Garratt Repetitive 4-Week Periods of Atrial Electrical Remodeling Promote Stability of Atrial Fibrillation: Time Course of a Second Factor Involved in the Self-Perpetuation of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, March 23, 2004; 109(11): 1434 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Marin, V. Roldan, V. Climent, and G. Y. H. Lip Matrix metalloproteinases in atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 7, 2004; 43(1): 152 - 152. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Boldt, U. Wetzel, J. Weigl, J. Garbade, J. Lauschke, G. Hindricks, H. Kottkamp, J. F. Gummert, and S. Dhein Expression of angiotensin II receptors in human left and right atrial tissue in atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1785 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sanders, J. B. Morton, P. M. Kistler, J. K. Vohra, J. M. Kalman, and P. B. Sparks Reversal of Atrial Mechanical Dysfunction After Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for the Mechanisms of Tachycardia-Mediated Atrial Cardiomyopathy Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1976 - 1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Marin, V. Roldan, V. Climent, A. Garcia, P. Marco, and G. Y.H. Lip Is Thrombogenesis in Atrial Fibrillation Related to Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Its Inhibitor, TIMP-1? Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1181 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schotten, M. Duytschaever, J. Ausma, S. Eijsbouts, H.-R. Neuberger, and M. Allessie Electrical and Contractile Remodeling During the First Days of Atrial Fibrillation Go Hand in Hand Circulation, March 18, 2003; 107(10): 1433 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel Atrial Electrophysiology and Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrillation Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1_suppl): S5 - S11. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Lindgren, M. J. Pekka Raatikainen, K. E. Juhani Airaksinen, and H. V. Huikuri Relationship between the frequency of paroxysmal episodes of atrial fibrillation and pulmonary venous flow pattern Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(1): 17 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sanders, J. B. Morton, J. G. Morgan, N. C. Davidson, S. J. Spence, J. K. Vohra, J. M. Kalman, and P. B. Sparks Reversal of Atrial Mechanical Stunning After Cardioversion of Atrial Arrhythmias: Implications for the Mechanisms of Tachycardia-Mediated Atrial Cardiomyopathy Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1806 - 1813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Goette, M. Arndt, C. Rocken, T. Staack, R. Bechtloff, D. Reinhold, C. Huth, S. Ansorge, H. U. Klein, and U. Lendeckel Calpains and cytokines in fibrillating human atria Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): H264 - H272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rucker-Martin, F. Pecker, D. Godreau, and S. N Hatem Dedifferentiation of atrial myocytes during atrial fibrillation: role of fibroblast proliferation in vitro Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2002; 55(1): 38 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Allessie, J. Ausma, and U. Schotten Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 230 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Goette, U. Lendeckel, and H. U Klein Signal transduction systems and atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 247 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F Bosch and S. Nattel Cellular electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 259 - 269. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M.W van der Velden and H. J Jongsma Cardiac gap junctions and connexins: their role in atrial fibrillation and potential as therapeutic targets Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 270 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J.J.M. Brundel, R. H. Henning, H. H. Kampinga, I. C. Van Gelder, and H. J.G.M. Crijns Molecular mechanisms of remodeling in human atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel Therapeutic implications of atrial fibrillation mechanisms: can mechanistic insights be used to improve AF management? Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 347 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kostin, G. Klein, Z. Szalay, S. Hein, E. P Bauer, and J. Schaper Structural correlate of atrial fibrillation in human patients Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 361 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dobrev, E. Wettwer, A. Kortner, M. Knaut, S. Schuler, and U. Ravens Human inward rectifier potassium channels in chronic and postoperative atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 397 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L.J.L Thijssen, H. M.W van der Velden, E. P van Ankeren, J. Ausma, M. A Allessie, M. Borgers, G. J.J.M van Eys, and H. J Jongsma Analysis of altered gene expression during sustained atrial fibrillation in the goat Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 427 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schotten, M. Greiser, D. Benke, K. Buerkel, B. Ehrenteidt, C. Stellbrink, J. F Vazquez-Jimenez, F. Schoendube, P. Hanrath, and M. Allessie Atrial fibrillation-induced atrial contractile dysfunction: a tachycardiomyopathy of a different sort Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 192 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dobrev, E. Graf, E. Wettwer, H. M. Himmel, O. Hala, C. Doerfel, T. Christ, S. Schuler, and U. Ravens Molecular Basis of Downregulation of G-Protein-Coupled Inward Rectifying K+ Current (IK,ACh) in Chronic Human Atrial Fibrillation: Decrease in GIRK4 mRNA Correlates With Reduced IK,ACh and Muscarinic Receptor-Mediated Shortening of Action Potentials Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2551 - 2557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L.J.L. Thijssen, J. Ausma, and M. Borgers Structural remodelling during chronic atrial fibrillation: act of programmed cell survival Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2001; 52(1): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Chung, D. O. Martin, D. Sprecher, O. Wazni, A. Kanderian, C. A. Carnes, J. A. Bauer, P. J. Tchou, M. J. Niebauer, A. Natale, et al. C-Reactive Protein Elevation in Patients With Atrial Arrhythmias: Inflammatory Mechanisms and Persistence of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, December 11, 2001; 104(24): 2886 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |