| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:496.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (S.S., D.P.), and The Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis (K.L.G.), University of Texas Medical School at Houston; and the Memorial Hermann Health Care System and Hermann Hospital, Houston, Tex.
Correspondence to K. Lance Gould, MD, The Weatherhead PET Center, University of Texas Medical School, 6431 Fannin St, Room 4.256 MSB, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail gould{at}heart.med.uth.tmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and
ResultsAfter medical and family histories
were recorded, 90 subjects underwent rest-dipyridamole cardiac PET
perfusion imaging, including 18 index cases (a subject with CAD
documented by PET and arteriography), 32 asymptomatic adults without
known CAD who had a parent or sibling with CAD among these index cases,
30 asymptomatic subjects with comparable coronary risk factors without
CAD or a family history of CAD, and 10 volunteer control subjects with
no risk factors and no family history. PET perfusion images were
quantified with automated software for size of abnormalities as percent
of the cardiac image outside 95% CIs of normal controls and for
severity as the lowest quadrant average relative activity. Of
asymptomatic subjects with a parent or sibling with CAD (first-degree
relatives), 50% had dipyridamole-induced myocardial perfusion defects
that involved
5% of the cardiac image outside normal 95% CIs with
or without other risk factors. The size of perfusion defects was larger
in first-degree relatives than in control subjects (11±13%
versus 1±1%, P=0.02) and
larger than in asymptomatic subjects with comparable risk factors but
no family history of CAD (11±13% versus 5±6%,
P=0.02).
ConclusionsThis study documents the presence of quantitative, statistically significant, dipyridamole-induced myocardial perfusion abnormalities on PET in 50% of asymptomatic persons with a parent or sibling with CAD, independent of other risk factors, indicating preclinical coronary atherosclerosis.
Key Words: tomography perfusion genetics risk factors coronary disease
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|

95%, even in
asymptomatic
subjects.5 12 13 14 15 16 17
In patients with abnormal coronary arteriograms, coronary flow reserve
on PET is reduced in myocardial regions without arteriographic
stenoses18 19 due
to diffuse disease that is not apparent on the
arteriogram,3 4 5 6 7
which, however, may cause perfusion abnormalities on dipyridamole
PET.20 Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that significant myocardial perfusion defects on dipyridamole PET are common in asymptomatic persons with a parent or sibling with CAD either with or without other risk factors or lipid disorders.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Detailed medical and family histories were obtained from every subject, including control subjects, particularly for risk factors defined as age of >45 years in men and >55 years in women, current cigarette smoking, blood pressure of >140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medication, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol of <35 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol of >130 mg/dL, triglyceride level of >200 mg/dL, and obesity. All subjects were advised prospectively to undergo cardiac PET with family history and/or risk factors as the only reason. Asymptomatic and control subjects were not taking cardiovascular medications.
PET Perfusion Imaging
PET imaging of myocardial perfusion was performed as
previously
described.5 21 22
Patients stopped smoking for 4 hours, fasted for 8 hours, and abstained
from ingesting caffeine and theophylline for 24 hours before the PET
study. PET was performed with the University of Texasdesigned Posicam
BGO multislice tomograph with a reconstructed resolution of 10-mm full
width at half-maximum (FWHM). Transmission images were obtained to
correct for photon attenuation. Emission images obtained after the
intravenous injection of 18 mCi of cyclotron-produced
[13N]ammonia contained 20 to 40 million
counts.
At 40 minutes after administration of the first dose of ammonia to allow for decay of the first radionuclide dose, dipyridamole (0.142 mg·kg-1·min-1) was infused intravenously over 4 minutes. Four minutes after this infusion, a second dose of 18 mCi of [13N]ammonia was injected. Four minutes later, to allow blood pool clearing, PET imaging was repeated. Aminophylline (125 mg) was administered intravenously on a routine basis.
Automated Quantitative Analysis of PET
To obtain objective, quantitative measurements of PET
perfusion defects without observer bias in interpretation or selection
of regions of interest, a completely automated analysis of severity of
PET abnormalities was carried out with the use of previously described
software,5 21 22
which is briefly reviewed here. A 3-dimensional (3-D) restructuring
algorithm generates true short- and long-axis views from PET transaxial
cardiac images, perpendicular to and parallel to the long axis of the
left ventricle. To avoid the visual spatial distortion inherent in
polar displays, the circumferential profiles are used to reconstruct
3-D topographic views of the left ventricle that show relative regional
activity distribution. The 3-D topographic views are divided into fixed
sections that consist of a septal, an anterior, a lateral, and an
inferior quadrant of the 3-D topographic display
(Figure 1
).
|
A mean algorithm determines, for each of the 3-D topographic views, the mean activity level in each of these 4 quadrants expressed as relative activity normalized to the maximum 2% of pixels in the whole heart data set and scaled as 100% in control subjects and patients. Finally, an algorithm automatically identifies regions of each topographic quadrant with values that deviate outside 95% CIs of normal values on the basis of studies of 10 normal volunteers without risk factors or family history and computes the percentage of the cardiac image outside 95% CIs.
PET End Points
The end points that were measured automatically on
PET images were size of the perfusion defects, quantified as the
percent of the cardiac images outside 95% CIs of the normal control
group, and severity, defined as the lowest quadrant average relative
activity (ie, the average relative activity for the quadrant with the
lowest average activity of the anterior, septal, lateral, and inferior
quadrants for each subject). The quadrant with the lowest or minimum
relative activity contains the perfusion defect or defects and
quantifies the relative severity of segmental perfusion abnormalities
at rest and after dipyridamole stress. For example, a value of 60%
indicates that the mean relative activity for the quadrant with the
lowest counts, and therefore containing the perfusion defect, is 60%
of the normal maximum of 100%. In prior studies, automated
quantification of size and severity has been most sensitive and
reliable with the least statistical variability for distinguishing
between groups of patients with PET perfusion
imaging.5 21 22
For determination of the proportion of subjects in each group as abnormal or normal in a binary classification, a conservative threshold of >5% of the perfusion images outside 95% CIs was used that had to be a contiguous circumscribed perfusion defect (not random pixels) on the basis of objective software determined criteria. The 5% threshold size is a defect that is visually obvious, that is not due to small variations in activity, and that is outside normal 95% CIs. However, all patient categorizations in this study were based on objective software criteria with no end points that used visual interpretation.
Statistical Analysis
Automated measures of differences in these end points
between groups of patients were analyzed as continuous variables using
ANOVA with the Bonferroni/Dunn post hoc correction in StatView (Abacus
Concepts)
software.23 24
Data are reported as mean±1 SD. For discrete variables such as number
or percent of subjects showing changes outside 95% CIs, significance
of differences between groups was determined by the
2 test
(StatView).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5% of the
myocardium outside normal 95% CIs of
(Figure 2
5% of their cardiac
image outside the normal 95% CIs
(Figure 2
|
To compare the relative influence of family history of CAD
with the influence of other risk factors, we also compared the
asymptomatic subjects with a family history of CAD with persons with no
family history of CAD but with other comparable risk factors (30
patients). The prevalence of dipyridamole PET perfusion abnormalities
in these 2 groups was not significantly different (50% versus 36%)
(Figure 2
). Therefore, a person with a parent or sibling with
CAD but no other risk factors had a prevalence of abnormal dipyridamole
PET images comparable to that of persons with other risk factors but no
parent or sibling with CAD. The prevalence of dipyridamole-induced
perfusion abnormalities among all groups compared with normal controls
with no family history of vascular disease and no risk factors was
significant (P<0.001,
2).
Determination of prevalence through categorization of
subjects as normal or abnormal in this analysis is not directly
relatable on a clinical basis to an individual. For clinical purposes,
we also analyzed average size and severity of perfusion abnormalities,
so that the results for an individual could be compared with standard
deviation limits of normal controls. The average size of perfusion
defects in asymptomatic persons with a parent or sibling with CAD
(first-degree relatives) was 11±13% of the myocardial image,
significantly larger than that of normal controls
(P=0.02)
(Figure 3
, top). The mean severity of perfusion defects,
measured as the lowest quadrant average of relative activity, was
68±6% in these first-degree relatives, significantly worse than the
value of 76±6% in normal controls
(P<0.001)
(Figure 3
, bottom), the normal range incorporating biological
and imaging variability.
|
We also compared the average size and severity of perfusion
defects in asymptomatic persons with and without family history but
comparable other risk factors. In the asymptomatic group with a parent
or sibling with CAD, the size of dipyridamole-induced perfusion defects
was larger that than in subjects with comparable risk factors but no
family history of CAD
(Figure 3
, top). However, the severity of perfusion defects
did not differ between the 2 groups
(Figure 3
, bottom). Therefore, a family history was
associated with more extensive disease (larger defects) but not more
severe disease (intensity of the perfusion defects) compared with
subjects with comparable other risk factors but no family history of
vascular disease. Although control subjects demonstrated perfusion
heterogeneity
(Figure 3
), none had 5% of the cardiac image outside 2 SD
limits of normal.
Finally, the size and severity of dipyridamole-induced
perfusion defects in the subset of asymptomatic subjects with a parent
or sibling with CAD but no other risk factors were compared with
control subjects with neither family history nor other risk factors.
The size (12±14%)
(Figure 4
, top) and severity (67±6%)
(Figure 4
, bottom) of perfusion defects in this subset of the
first-degree relatives with no other risk factors except family history
were also significantly abnormal compared with those of normal controls
(P
0.02).
|
As evidence against selection bias, there were no
significant differences in characteristics other than PET scans between
asymptomatic persons with a parent or sibling with heart disease and
asymptomatic persons with no family history of CAD in any relative,
either a first-degree relative or a more distant relation
(Table
).
|
Within the asymptomatic group with a parent or sibling with CAD, the 13 subjects with LDL cholesterol concentrations of >130 mg/dL had perfusion defects (as percent of the cardiac image outside 95% CIs; 11±2%) of a size that was not significantly different from the size in 11 patients with concentrations of <130 mg/dL (8±1%); both groups had HDL cholesterol above 35 mg/dL. Therefore, the influence of family history on the size and severity of dipyridamole-induced perfusion defects was independent of cholesterol levels.
Dipyridamole PET from 2 separate families illustrates visually the perfusion abnormalities that were quantified objectively for the study.
The myocardial perfusion images after dipyridamole PET from
a 73-year-old woman with mild-to-moderate defects in 3-vessel
distribution
(Figure 5
) indicate mild 3-vessel CAD confirmed on
arteriography. Her 3 asymptomatic sons aged 43 to 55 years had moderate
perfusion abnormalities outside the normal 95% CIs, indicating
mild-to-moderate 3-vessel CAD.
|
The myocardial perfusion images after dipyridamole in
a 68-year-old man showed severe CAD on PET confirmed with arteriography
(Figure 6
). His youngest son, aged 37, has moderately severe
perfusion abnormalities in the left circumflex and right coronary
artery distributions with mild defects in the left anterior descending
distribution, all outside normal 95% CIs. The other son, aged 42, has
a borderline image with mild perfusion defects in the left circumflex
and left anterior descending distribution with a mild longitudinal
base-to-apex perfusion gradient typical of mild diffuse coronary
atherosclerosis.21 The
daughters scan is normal.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are 2 potential mechanisms that cause perfusion abnormalities after dipyridamole in asymptomatic persons with a parent or sibling with CAD. The first is reduced coronary flow reserve due to preclinical, mild, diffuse, and/or segmental coronary artery narrowing without ischemia.5 20 The second is endothelial dysfunction, preceding luminal narrowing and cardiac events.25 Although a direct coronary arteriolar vasodilator, dipyridamole-induced increase in coronary flow may normally be augmented by shear-sensitive endothelium-mediated additional arteriolar dilation. Endothelial dysfunction due to preclinical atherosclerosis may therefore reduce flow reserve somewhat by reducing the shear-sensitive component of vasodilation and flow capacity.21 22
Study Limitations
Any unrecognized diffuse CAD in the normal subjects
with no risk factors or family history of CAD would tend to reduce the
significance of differences between the patient groups and the normal
control subjects, shown here as significant. The partial volume error
in this study was addressed by comparing subjects with the normal 95%
CIs of the normal volunteers, because the partial volume errors apply
equally to all groups studied with the same PET scanner and software.
Coronary arteriograms were not routinely obtained in asymptomatic
persons with a parent or sibling with CAD for ethical and technical
reasons. Although percent diameter stenosis on coronary arteriography
is commonly used as the standard measure of severity of CAD, there are
major
problems5 6 7
with this end point.
Absolute myocardial perfusion in mL · min-1 · g-1 was not determined in this study because the relative distribution of radionuclide uptake is the most conservative end point for identification of CAD. Flow-calculating models correct for the "roll off" or declining radionuclide extraction that occurs with higher myocardial perfusion rates. Therefore, the relative regional differences in radionuclide uptake are magnified into greater differences in absolute perfusion with any flow model depending on the perfusion level and the radionuclide. Quantification of absolute perfusion and coronary flow reserve would increase the number of subjects with perfusion abnormalities to more than 50% by identifying patients with diffusely reduced coronary flow reserve even in the absence of objectively quantified relative regional perfusion defects.18 19 20 Therefore, as a conservative measure, we quantitatively analyzed only the relative myocardial uptake of radionuclide.
Conclusions
In the present study, asymptomatic persons with a
parent or sibling with CAD have a 50% probability of having
quantitatively statistically significant dipyridamole-induced
myocardial perfusion abnormalities on PET as preclinical noninvasive,
scintigraphic markers of CAD. These preclinical scintigraphic markers
are independent of risk factor profile and are related to the history
of CAD in immediate family members (ie, parents or siblings). In
addition to this high prevalence of preclinical atherosclerosis,
asymptomatic persons with a parent or sibling with CAD have more
extensive but not more severe dipyridamole-induced perfusion abnormalities
than do subjects with comparable other risk factors but without a family
history of CAD. These observations suggest that the effects of vigorous
risk factor modification and pharmacological lipid lowering on clinical
outcome in asymptomatic adults with a parent or sibling with CAD should be
evaluated.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 1, 2000; revision received August 25, 2000; accepted September 13, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Bao W, Srinivasan
SR, Valdez R, et al. Longitudinal changes in cardiovascular risk from
childhood to young adulthood in offspring of parents with coronary
artery disease: the Bogalusa Heart Study.
JAMA. 1997;278:17791780.
3. Gould KL. Coronary Artery Stenosis and Reversing Heart Disease, 2nd ed. London, UK: Arnold Publishers; 1999 [distributed in U S A by Oxford University Press].
4.
Topol EJ, Nissen
SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology: the dissociation
between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease.
Circulation. 1995;92:23332342.
5.
Mintz GS, Popma JJ,
Pichard AD, et al. Limitations of angiography in the assessment of
plaque distribution in coronary artery disease: a systematic study of
target lesion eccentricity in 1446 lesions.
Circulation. 1996;93:924931.
6.
Tuzcu EM, Hobbs RE,
Rincon G, et al. Occult and frequent transmission of atherosclerotic
coronary disease with cardiac transplantation: insights from
intravascular ultrasound.
Circulation. 1995;91:17061713.
7. Hausmann D, Johnson JA, Sudhir K, et al. Angiographically silent atherosclerosis detected in intravascular ultrasound in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia: correlation with high density lipoproteins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:15621570,.[Abstract]
8.
Falk E, Shah PK,
Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption.
Circulation. 1995;92:657671.
9.
Libby P. Molecular
bases of the acute coronary syndromes.
Circulation. 1995;91:28442850.
10.
Brown BG, Zhao
XQ, Sacco DE, et al. Lipid lowering and plaque regression: new insights
into prevention of plaque disruption and clinical events in coronary
artery disease. Circulation. 1993;87:17811791.
11.
Mann J, Davies
MJ. Vulnerable plaque: relation of characteristics to degree of
stenosis in human coronary arteries.
Circulation. 1996;94:928931.
12.
Demer LL, Gould
KL, Goldstein RA, et al. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by
positron emission tomography: comparison to quantitative coronary
arteriography in 193 patients.
Circulation. 1989;79:825835.
13. Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Mullani N, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation, VIII: feasibility of 3D cardiac positron imaging without a cyclotron using generator produced Rb-82. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:775792.[Abstract]
14. Gupta NC, Esterbrooks D, Mohiuddin S, et al. Adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging using positron emission tomography. Am Heart J. 1991;122:293301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Williams BR. Positron emission tomography for assessment of ischemia and myocardial viability. J Myocard Ischemia. 1900;2:3864.
16.
Go RT, Marwick
TH, MacIntyre WJ, et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET
and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single
dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
J Nucl Med. 1990;31:18991905.
17. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:13031310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Dayannikli F,
Grambow D, Muzik O, et al. Early detection of abnormal coronary flow
reserve in asymptomatic men at high risk of coronary artery disease
using positron emission tomography.
Circulation. 1994;90:808817.
19. Uren NG, Marraccini P, Gistri R, et al. Altered coronary vasodilator reserve and metabolism in myocardium subtended by normal arteries in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:650658.[Abstract]
20.
Gould KL,
Nakagawa Y, Nakagawa K, et al. Frequency and clinical implications of
fluid dynamically significant diffuse coronary artery disease manifest
as graded, longitudinal, base to apex, myocardial perfusion
abnormalities by non-invasive positron emission tomography.
Circulation. 2000;101:19311939.
21.
Gould KL,
Martucci JP, Goldberg DI, et al. Short-term cholesterol lowering
decreases in size and severity of perfusion abnormalities by positron
emission tomography after dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery
disease. Circulation. 1994;89:15301538.
22. Gould K, Ornish D, Scherwitz L, et al. Changes in myocardial perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after long-term, intense risk factor modification. J AMA. 1995;274:894901.
23. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989.
24. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, UK: Black Scientific Publications; 1971.
25.
Schachinger V,
Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator
dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease.
Circulation. 2000;101:18991906.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, A. Guha, and S. Sdringola Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1112 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sdringola, C. Loghin, F. Boccalandro, and K. L. Gould Mechanisms of Progression and Regression of Coronary Artery Disease by PET Related to Treatment Intensity and Clinical Events at Long-Term Follow-up J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 59 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Rodrigues de Avila, J. L. Fernandes, C. E. Rochitte, G. G. Cerri, and J. P. Filho Perfusion Impairment in Patients with Normal-appearing Coronary Arteries: Identification with Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2382041697. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Johnson and K. L. Gould Clinical Evaluation of a New Concept: Resting Myocardial Perfusion Heterogeneity Quantified by Markovian Analysis of PET Identifies Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Early Atherosclerosis in 1,034 Subjects J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1427 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Loghin, S. Sdringola, and K. L. Gould Common Artifacts in PET Myocardial Perfusion Images Due to Attenuation-Emission Misregistration: Clinical Significance, Causes, and Solutions J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Lloyd-Jones, B.-H. Nam, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, D. Levy, J. M. Murabito, T. J. Wang, P. W. F. Wilson, and C. J. O'Donnell Parental Cardiovascular Disease as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-aged Adults: A Prospective Study of Parents and Offspring JAMA, May 12, 2004; 291(18): 2204 - 2211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Wang, B.-H. Nam, R. B. D'Agostino, P. A. Wolf, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, C. A. MacRae, P. W. Wilson, J. F. Polak, and C. J. O'Donnell Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Associated With Premature Parental Coronary Heart Disease: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, August 5, 2003; 108(5): 572 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Blumenthal, D. M. Becker, L. R. Yanek, T. R. Aversano, T. F. Moy, B. G. Kral, and L. C. Becker Detecting Occult Coronary Disease in a High-Risk Asymptomatic Population Circulation, February 11, 2003; 107(5): 702 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sdringola, K. Nakagawa, Y. Nakagawa, S. W. Yusuf, F. Boccalandro, N. Mullani, M. Haynie, M. J. Hess, and K. L. Gould Combined intense lifestyle and pharmacologic lipid treatment further reduce coronary events and myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with usual-care cholesterol-lowering drugs in coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2003; 41(2): 263 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Jomini, S.e. Oppliger-Pasquali, V. Wietlisbach, N. Rodondi, V. Jotterand, F. Paccaud, R. Darioli, P. Nicod, and V. Mooser contribution of major cardiovascular risk factors to familial premature coronary artery disease: The GENECARD project J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 21, 2002; 40(4): 676 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |