(Circulation. 2001;103:401.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Starship Childrens Hospital (L.M.V.), Auckland, New Zealand; Green Lane Hospital (N.J.W., J.M.N., R.M.L.W.), Auckland, New Zealand; and Departments of Molecular Medicine (R.V.A., L.M.C.) and Paediatrics (D.R.L.), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Correspondence to Dr Lesley Voss, Starship Childrens Hospital, Park Road, Private Bag 92024, Auckland 1030, New Zealand. E-mail ssinfect{at}ahsl.co.nz
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThis prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated IVIG in patients with a first episode of rheumatic fever, stratifying patients by the presence and severity of carditis before randomization. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 1 g/kg IVIG on days 1 and 2 and 0.4 g/kg on days 14 and 28, or they received a placebo infusion. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic evaluation was performed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 26, and 52 weeks. Fifty-nine patients were treated, of whom 39 had carditis (including 4 subclinical) and/or migratory polyarthritis (n=39). There was no difference between groups in the rate of normalization of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or acute-phase proteins at the 6-week follow-up. On echocardiography, 59% in the IVIG group and 69% in the placebo group had carditis at baseline. There was no significant difference in the cardiac outcome, including the proportion of valves involved, or in the severity of valvar regurgitation at 1 year. At 1 year, 41% of the IVIG and 50% of the placebo group had carditis.
ConclusionsIVIG did not alter the natural history of ARF, with no detectable difference in the clinical, laboratory, or echocardiographic parameters of the disease process during the subsequent 12 months.
Key Words: rheumatic heart disease proteins echocardiography immune system
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although an acute episode of rheumatic fever is preceded by a streptococcal throat infection, the mechanism that triggers ARF has not been elucidated.5 6 There is no proven pharmacological treatment that alters the natural history of rheumatic carditis, although corticosteroids and aspirin are frequently administered. Recent work has indicated that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be of benefit in immune-mediated cardiac disorders.7 8 This is seen particularly in Kawasaki disease, in which the use of high-dose IVIG markedly reduces the prevalence of coronary artery abnormalities.9
We present the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of IVIG as an acute intervention in patients with ARF to determine whether there was a reduction in the extent and severity of carditis, more rapid resolution of inflammatory activity, or decreased chronic morbidity.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of IVIG. Randomization was by small-group random-number allocation. Exclusion criteria included patients with an ESR of <30 mm/h, a past history of rheumatic fever, IgA deficiency, chorea alone, evidence of marked valve thickening, or other evidence of chronic valvulitis on echocardiography. The patient, family, and cardiologists were unaware of the nature of the infusion being administered. Patients were stratified by the presence and severity of carditis before randomization. Each patient received an infusion of either IVIG or placebo (4% dextrose, 0.18% normal saline) at a dose of 1 g/kg on days 0 and 1 (maximum, 60 g) and then 0.4 mg/kg on days 14 and 28. Full assessments were made before the infusion. The IVIG preparation used (Intragam) was obtained from Commonwealth Serum Laboratories. This product is made by cold ethanol fractionation of human plasma and adjusted to a pH of 4. Human plasma was obtained from voluntary donations in New Zealand.
All patients received standard care for children with ARF. This consists of bed/chair rest in hospital for 2 weeks, oral penicillin for 2 weeks or until discharge, and then 4 weekly administrations of intramuscular benzathine (long-acting) penicillin. Salicylates were used as required for symptomatic relief of arthritis but were not prescribed routinely. Cardiac drugs were administered as required. Corticosteroids were not used. Patients with carditis remained on bed/chair rest in hospital until the ESR was <30 mm/h. Patients without carditis were discharged at 2 weeks on restricted activity.
Clinical, laboratory, and cardiac evaluation was performed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 26, and 52 weeks. Initial clinical assessment consisted of daily measurements of heart rate (awake and sleeping), temperature, joint involvement, and presence or absence of rash, chorea, or nodules. The blood parameters assessed weekly included ESR, C-reactive protein, and streptococcal serology for 6 weeks or until discharge if this was longer. Isolates of group A streptococcus grown from throat cultures were sent for M typing.
The end points assessed in this study were time to
resolution of inflammation with assessment of time for the ESR to drop
to
30 mm/h, time to quiescence of disease activity (joint symptoms)
assessed clinically, and the difference in the frequency and severity
of cardiac disease at each evaluation time point.
Cardiac evaluation consisted of assessment by standard clinical and echocardiographic criteria,12 separately recorded for mitral, aortic, tricuspid, and pulmonary regurgitation, with the overall grade determined by echocardiography. Grades for valvar regurgitation were as follows: nil (including physiological or trivial valvar regurgitation),13 14 mild (including subclinical but pathological regurgitation),15 16 17 18 moderate, and severe.12 19 The minimal criteria to allow a diagnosis of pathological regurgitation included a substantial color jet seen in 2 planes extending well beyond the valve leaflets with continuous-wave or pulsed Doppler holodiastolic (aortic regurgitation) or holosystolic (mitral regurgitation) with well-defined, high-velocity spectral envelope.16 Mitral regurgitation was considered moderate if there was a broad high-intensity proximal jet filling half the left atrium or a lesser volume high-intensity jet producing prominent blunting of pulmonary venous inflow. Abnormal regurgitant color and Doppler flow patterns in pulmonary veins were a prerequisite for severe mitral regurgitation. Aortic regurgitation was considered moderate if the diameter of the regurgitant jet was 15% to 30% of the diameter of the left ventricular outflow tract with flow reversal in upper descending aorta.19 Reversal in lower descending aorta was required for severe regurgitation. Overall, carditis was considered present when there was echocardiographic mild or greater left heart valvulitis.16 Clinical carditis was considered present when there was a diagnostic murmur. Although diffuse and focal thickening of the mitral valve have been described in ARF,20 we have not attempted to include such observations in our assessment. Isolated pulmonary or tricuspid regurgitation in the absence of left heart valvulitis was not considered evidence of carditis. One of 2 pediatric cardiologists (N.J.W., J.M.N.), both experienced in the assessment of children with rheumatic carditis, directly supervised the echocardiographic studies, with particular attention paid to color gain consistency and standardization of views. All studies were recorded on Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1000 or 1500 echocardiographic machines with a full range of transducers. ECGs were recorded at each evaluation, but a chest radiograph was performed only at baseline and the 6-month follow-up.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were compared by use of unpaired
t tests (modified if the F test
showed the variances were unequal) with allowance made for multiple
comparisons by the Bonferroni adjustment. The
2 test was used for comparison of binary
data with continuity
correction.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was no difference in basic demographics between the 2
groups at enrollment
(Table 1
). All were indigenous Maori (37%) or
Pacific Island New Zealanders (63%), the latter predominantly of
Samoan ethnicity. Thirty-nine patients had migratory polyarthritis, 35
had clinical carditis, and 4 had subclinical carditis at diagnosis
(Table 2
). There were 2 patients with pericarditis in each
group. Eight patients without carditis on admission developed evidence
of carditis 2 to 6 weeks later. Four of these developed subclinical
carditis only, and 4 developed clinical carditis.
|
|
Twenty-two patients had arthritis as their only major criterion, 16 had carditis alone, 1 had arthritis with subcutaneous nodules, 2 had carditis and chorea, and 1 had carditis and erythema marginatum. By definition, no patient had a past history of rheumatic fever. Minor thickening of the mitral valve in 4 patients was attributed to acute rather than chronic rheumatic fever. A family history of rheumatic fever was present in 22 patients (37%; 14 IVIG, 8 placebo); a parent or sibling in just over half the cases (54%); and a grandparent, aunt, or uncle in the remainder. Thirty-five children (59%) reported sore throats before or on admission, but only 13 (37%) of these were receiving antibiotic treatment. In only 4 patients was the antibiotic course prescribed and taken appropriately. Twelve children (20%) had positive throat culture for Streptococcus pyogenes on admission. Nine were M typed; of these, 5 could not be typed, 2 were NZ 1437, 1 was M53, and 1 was M53/80. All 61 had serological confirmation of a preceding streptococcal infection.
There was no difference in the level of ESR, C-reactive
protein, or other acute-phase reactants at 6 weeks
(Figure 1
). A significant difference in ESR between groups
was seen at week 2 but did not persist. The time taken for the ESR to
drop to
30 mm/h was similar in both groups.
|
There were 17 patients with carditis in the IVIG group and
22 in the placebo group at baseline
(Table 3
and
Figure 2
). No significant difference in reduction in
carditis when assessed with and without subclinical carditis was seen
at 1 year, whether assessed on the basis of affected patients or
affected valves
(Figure 2
and
Table 4
).16 17 21
Preliminary stratification had resulted in an equal proportion of
patients with nil, mild, or severe carditis in the treated and placebo
groups, but some imbalance occurred because of withdrawals. There was
no difference in the relative proportion of patients exhibiting mild,
moderate, or severe carditis over time assessed at 2, 4, or 6 weeks and
at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits
(Table 3
). There were no differences in indexes of left
ventricular function between the IVIG and placebo groups at baseline
and at follow-up. Shortening fraction was normal at all time points
(Figure 3
).
|
|
|
|
Aspirin was used for relief of symptomatic arthritis only; 75% in the control group and 55% in the IVIG group were treated until resolution of symptoms. Analysis of these patients with and without carditis showed no influence of aspirin on cardiac outcome.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the activation of inflammatory mediators, it was hoped that IVIG would minimize the valvulitis in ARF, but our study did not show this. Possible explanations for a lack of demonstrable efficacy of IVIG in this study include the pathogenesis of ARF, the dose and type of IVIG preparation used, and the power of the study. The effectiveness of IVIG in Kawasaki disease is dependent on the patient receiving IVIG within 10 days of the onset of symptoms.24 In ARF, there is characteristically a 1- to 3-week interval from the initiating group A streptococcal throat infection and the onset of symptoms. A further delay in diagnosis may occur as the Jones criteria for ARF become fulfilled over time, both before and after medical attention is received. In this study, the average duration of symptoms before the first infusion was 9 days, a reflection of the combined time to seek medical care and time for diagnosis to be made. This delay may have allowed the inflammatory process to advance, potentially negating any benefit of IVIG. The study was carried out in an urban setting, and a significant improvement in the time from onset to diagnosis is unlikely to be achieved. The dose of IVIG given to these patients was probably adequate, because the initial dose was similar to that used in Kawasaki disease.24 This initial dose was given over 2 days, a protocol designed to minimize the effects of volume loading on patients in incipient heart failure. The protocol also included further maintenance doses 2 and 4 weeks later to allow for the protracted course of ARF. A number of different preparations of IVIG have been used in the studies of Kawasaki disease and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with similar efficacy.9 Although no studies have compared different preparations, it is likely that most IVIG products are therapeutically equivalent.25 It is unlikely that the lack of effect of IVIG was a result of the preparation used. There may have been advantages in using a preparation made from New Zealand plasma, which should contain antibodies against local streptococcal strains.
No medical intervention has been shown to limit the degree
of valve damage produced by ARF. Aspirin relieves symptoms but does not
influence outcome. In 1954, Illingworth et
al26 reviewed 170 articles
and found no influence of aspirin on carditis, confirmed again by the
UK-US joint report.27 The
meta-analysis on corticosteroid treatment by Albert et
al28 showed minor variation
in outcome of smaller studies but no evidence of limitation of valve
lesions, although a response of
10% could have been missed. Despite
these studies, many patients worldwide with ARF continue to receive
salicylates and steroids.
The present study was designed to detect an improvement in the natural history of carditis by IVIG if there had been a 60% improvement in the treated group and a 25% improvement in control subjects at 1 year. Such a benefit was predicted if IVIG proved as effective as it is in Kawasaki disease. In the largest study of this condition, coronary aneurysms were detected in 14 of 79 patients (18%) treated with aspirin compared with 3 of 79 (4%) treated with aspirin plus IVIG.21 Other studies report a similar response.9 If IVIG had a similar effect on rheumatic fever, our study would have shown a highly significant benefit (P>0.001). If IVIG has an influence on rheumatic fever, it is clearly not of this order.
In the older literature, murmurs disappeared in 40% of 250
cases,29 23% of 243
cases,30 and 32% of 216
cases over 1 to 2.5 years.31
Reports in smaller studies are congruent with these figures, and a
recent study reported the disappearance of murmurs in 45 of 123
patients (37%).32 It is
notable that when follow-up echocardiographic studies were undertaken,
100% of subjects who originally had moderate or severe and 50% of
those who had mild mitral regurgitation still showed regurgitation at
follow-up.32 If, as is
likely, the same phenomenon applies to those without echocardiography,
the revised rate of disappearance of carditis is 37%. In our study,
using echocardiographic assessment, 27% of patients given placebo
showed a return to normal, an indication of the natural improvement of
valvulitis in ARF. Similarly, 35% of valves with mitral or
aortic regurgitation returned to normal
(Table 4
).
Our study provides convincing evidence that IVIG is not as
efficacious in rheumatic fever as in Kawasaki disease. It happens,
though, that there is a 4% to 5% advantage with IVIG in the reduction
of valve lesions both on clinical assessment and on echocardiography
(Table 4
). If this difference is real, it is predicted that
a minimum of 747 subjects (1494 valves) would be required in an
expanded randomized controlled trial to demonstrate an advantage with
P=0.05 and a power of 90% or
1398 patients (2796 valves) with
P=0.01 and a power of 90% with
echocardiographic assessment. The equivalent numbers with clinical
assessment only are 802 subjects (1604 valves) for
P=0.05 and a power of 90% and
1503 subjects (3006 valves) for
P=0.01 and a power of
90%.33 Such a study would
be a formidable undertaking.
Although there was no beneficial effect at 1 year of IVIG in this study, it is possible that a late beneficial effect on the incidence of chronic rheumatic heart disease will be found. However, this is unlikely given the natural history of improvement of ARF with time, the initial lack of beneficial effect of IVIG, and the number of patients in the study.
We believe that this study supports the value of
echocardiography in assessing ARF and subsequent progress and that it
should be regarded as an essential tool in assessing valve damage and
its subsequent progress. An echocardiographic assessment of mild aortic
or mitral regurgitation provides evidence of carditis with a very low
false-positive rate. A false-positive rate occurs also with clinical
assessment.
Figure 2
shows that valve regurgitation based on
echocardiography assessment alone makes only a small contribution to
the number of patients diagnosed but confirms that valvular involvement
persists quite frequently when physical signs have returned to normal.
We continue to fully utilize echocardiography in patient management.
The fact that less severely damaged valves have a greater propensity to
recover has been established for decades. Judgments about duration of
prophylaxis and protection against endocarditis can be made on clinical
grounds and will become more secure as experience with the natural
history of echocardiography-only valve leaks accumulates.
We showed no benefit from the use of IVIG in ARF. There was no significant reduction in the extent of severity of carditis assessed clinically or by echocardiography. Similarly, there was no improvement in the rate of normalization of other acute inflammatory markers in the patients who received IVIG. From the figures, a very large study would be required to test this definitively with a robust statistical conclusion. This would require an international collaborative study with a uniformly high level of skills and compliance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 3, 2000; revision received August 22, 2000; accepted August 23, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Neutze JM. The cardiac aspects of rheumatic fever. In: Weatherall DJ, Ledingham JGG, Warrell DA, eds. Oxford Textbook of Medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1996:24322436.
3. Baker M, Chakraborty M. Rheumatic fever in New Zealand in the 1990s: still cause for concern. N Z Public Health Rep. 1996;3:1719.
4. Lennon D, Martin D, Wong E, et al. Longitudinal study of poststreptococcal disease in Auckland: rheumatic fever, glomerulonephritis, epidemiology and M typing 198186. N Z Med J. 1988;101:396398.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Cairns LM. The immunology of rheumatic fever. N Z Med J. 1988;101:388391.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Veasy LG, Hill HR. Immunologic and clinical correlations in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:400407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Dwyer JM. Manipulating the immune system with immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:107116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Burns JC, et al. The treatment of Kawasaki syndrome with intravenous immunoglobulin. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:341347.[Abstract]
9.
Durongpisitkul K,
Gururaj VJ, Park JM, et al. The prevention of coronary artery aneurysm
in Kawasaki disease: a meta-analysis on the efficacy of aspirin and
immunoglobulin treatment.
Pediatrics. 1995;96:10571061.
10.
Jones criteria
(revised) for guidance in the diagnosis of rheumatic fever.
Circulation. 1965;32:664668.
11.
Special Writing
Group on the Committee of Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki
Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young of the
American Heart Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic
fever: Jones criteria, 1992 update.
JAMA. 1992;268:20692073.
12. Snider AR, Serwer GA. Abnormalities of ventricular outflow. In: Snider AR, Serwer GA, eds. Echocardiography in Pediatric Heart Disease. 1st ed. Chicago, Ill: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc; 1990:115118.
13.
Sahn DJ, Maciel
BC. Physiological valvular regurgitation: Doppler echocardiography and
the potential for iatrogenic heart disease.
Circulation. 1988;78:10751077.
14. Kostucki W, Vandenbossche J, Friart A, et al. Pulsed Doppler regurgitant flow patterns of normal valves. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:309313.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Minich LL, Tani LY, Pagotto LT, et al. Doppler echocardiography distinguishes between physiologic and pathologic "silent" mitral regurgitation in patients with rheumatic fever. Clin Cardiol. 1997;20:924926.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wilson NJ, Neutze JM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of subclinical carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Int J Cardiol. 1995;50:16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Folger GM Jr,
Hajar R, Robida A, et al. Occurrence of valvular heart disease in acute
rheumatic fever without evident carditis: colour-flow Doppler
identification. Br Heart
J. 1992;67:434438.
18. Abernathy M, Bass N, Sharpe N, et al. Doppler echocardiography and the early diagnosis of carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Aust N Z J Med. 1994;24:530535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, et al. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:952959.[Abstract]
20.
Vasan RS,
Shrivastava S, Vijayakumar M, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of
patients with acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic carditis.
Circulation. 1996;94:7382.
21. Veasy LG, Wiedmeier SE, Orsmond GS, et al. Resurgence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:421427.[Abstract]
22. Buckley RH, Schiff RI. The use of intravenous immune globulin in immunodeficiency diseases. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:110117.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Stollerman GH. Rheumatic fever. Lancet. 1997;349:935942.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Beiser AS, et al. A single intravenous infusion of gamma globulin as compared with four infusions in the treatment of acute Kawasaki syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:16331639.[Abstract]
25.
Ratko TA, Burnett
DA, Foulke GE, et al, for the University Hospital Consortium Expert
Panel for Off-Label Use of Polyvalent Intravenously Administered
Immunoglobulin Preparations. Recommendations for off-label use of
intravenously administered immunoglobulin preparations.
JAMA. 1995;273:18651870.
26.
Illingworth RS,
Burke J, Doxiadis SA, et al. Salicylates in rheumatic fever: an attempt
to assess their value. QJM. 1954;23:177213.
27.
UK and US Joint
Report. The natural history of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart
disease: cooperative clinical trial of ACTH, cortisone, and aspirin.
Circulation. 1965;32:457476.
28. Albert DA, Harel L, Karrison T. The treatment of rheumatic carditis: a review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 1995;74:112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Massell BF, Fyler DC, Roy SB. The clinical picture of rheumatic fever: diagnosis, immediate prognosis, course and therapeutic implications. Am J Cardiol. 1958;1:436449.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Massell BF, Jhaveri S, Czoniczer G. Therapy and other factors influencing the course of rheumatic heart disease. Circulation. 1959;20:737.
31. Feinstein AR, Wood HF, Spagnuolo M, et al. Rheumatic fever in children and adolescents: cardiac changes and sequelae. Ann Intern Med. 1964;60:87126.
32. Veasy GL, Tani LY, Hill HR. Persistence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. J Pediatr. 1994;124:916.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Machin D, Campbell MJ. Statistical Tables for the Design of Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Mosby; 1987.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |