| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:363.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.L.B., D.P.C., E.J.T.); Vascular Medicine Program, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (A.T.H); and Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany (P.A.R., W.H.).
Correspondence to Eric J. Topol, MD, Department of Cardiology, F25, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, Ohio 44195. E-mail topole{at}ccf.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThe event rates for all-cause mortality, vascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalization were determined for the 1480 patients with a history of cardiac surgery randomized to either clopidogrel or aspirin in a trial of 19 185 patients. The event rate per year of vascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or rehospitalization was 22.3% in the 705 patients randomized to aspirin and 15.9% in the 775 patients randomized to clopidogrel (P=0.001). A risk reduction was also seen in each of the individual end points examined, including a 42.8% relative risk reduction in vascular death in patients on clopidogrel versus aspirin (P=0.030). In a multivariate model incorporating baseline clinical characteristics, clopidogrel therapy was independently associated with a decrease in vascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or rehospitalization in patients with a history of cardiac surgery, with a 31.2% relative risk reduction (95% CI, 15.8 to 43.8; P=0.0003). Although clopidogrel therapy was efficacious in the entire Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) population, multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with previous cardiac surgery derived particular benefit (P=0.015).
ConclusionCompared with aspirin, clopidogrel therapy results in a striking reduction in the elevated risk for recurrent ischemic events seen in patients with a history of prior cardiac surgery, along with a decreased risk of bleeding.
Key Words: aspirin bypass grafting platelets
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Secondary prevention with aspirin has been proven effective
in patients who have undergone cardiac
surgery.4 5 The
Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration demonstrated a significant
benefit of aspirin versus placebo in maintaining graft
patency.6 Despite the benefit
of aspirin, a large number of recurrent events
occur.7 Although aspirin can
successfully block thromboxane A2 production,
there are other pivotal pathways to platelet activation, such as that
resulting from ADP.8
Furthermore, a cohort of patients appears to be "aspirin
resistant," as defined by lacking significant, detectable platelet
inhibition after receiving aspirin therapy for
1
week.9 10
The Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) study was a large-scale, multicenter, blinded, randomized trial that compared the ADP receptor antagonist clopidogrel with aspirin in 19 185 patients. The trial showed modest superiority of clopidogrel for reducing recurrent ischemic events, with fewer bleeding complications.11 We sought to determine whether clopidogrel would be more effective than aspirin in reducing recurrent ischemic events in patients with previous cardiac surgery.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Statistical Analysis
Kaplan-Meier event rate estimates for the clopidogrel
and aspirin groups were used to assess the cumulative risk for the
primary composite end point of vascular death, ischemic or hemorrhagic
stroke, MI, or rehospitalization for ischemia or bleeding over a period
of 3 years (average treatment duration, 1.6 years). Survival curves for
the 2 treatment groups were compared by a 2-sided Mantel-Haenszel
(stratified log-rank) test, and the relative risk reduction (RRR) and
95% CIs were calculated from the Cox proportional-hazards model. The
proportion of patients hospitalized for various reasons was compared
between treatment groups by use of the Pearson
2 test. A multivariate Cox
proportional-hazards model was also used to adjust for baseline
characteristics, including age, weight, race, sex, hypertension, prior
MI, prior cerebrovascular event, congestive heart failure, smoking,
diabetes, claudication, and angina. A significance level of
P=0.05 was used for all
analyses. Because data on hospitalizations were collected only during
study drug treatment, all analyses were on-treatment analyses in which
the number of events continued to be counted against the patients
allocated treatment up to 28 days after the early permanent
discontinuation of study drug but not beyond the closing date of the
study. All statistical calculations were performed with SAS software
(version 6.12, SAS Institute
Inc).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Individual and Composite End Points
Figure 1
depicts the RRRs and 95% CIs for each end point,
as well as a composite of ischemic and bleeding events, for clopidogrel
versus aspirin. There were statistically significant RRRs in vascular
death and MI. All-cause death was also reduced in the group randomized
to clopidogrel, although this did not achieve statistical significance.
The reduction in ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke also did not reach
statistical significance. Hospitalization for ischemic events or
bleeding was significantly reduced, as was all-cause hospitalization.
The composite end point of death, MI, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke,
or rehospitalization per year was significantly reduced from 52.9% to
39.7% (RRR=22.4%; 95% CI, 10.4 to 32.8;
P=0.001). The rate per year of
vascular death, MI, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or
rehospitalization for ischemia or bleeding was 22.3% in the patients
randomized to aspirin and 15.9% in the patients randomized to
clopidogrel (RRR=28.9%; 95% CI, 13.1 to 14.8;
P=0.001). The rate per year of
death, MI, stroke, or rehospitalization specifically for ischemia was
reduced from 21.8% to 15.7% (RRR=27.8%; 95% CI, 11.7 to 40.9;
P=0.0014). The rate per year of
vascular death, MI, ischemic stroke, or rehospitalization for ischemia
was reduced from 21.6% to 15.2% (RRR=29.3%; 95% CI, 13.3 to 42.3;
P=0.0008).
Figure 2A
depicts the Kaplan-Meier curve for vascular death,
and
Figure 2B
depicts the Kaplan-Meier curve for vascular death,
MI, stroke, or rehospitalization for ischemia or
bleeding.
|
|
CAPRIE End Point
The composite end point used in the main CAPRIE
trialvascular death, MI, or ischemic strokewas examined in those
patients with a history of cardiac surgery
(Figure 1
). A 36.3% RRR (95% CI, 13.4 to 53.1) was seen
with clopidogrel (5.8% event rate per year) compared with aspirin
(9.1% event rate per year,
P=0.004). Similarly, there was
a 31.8% RRR (95% CI, 8.2 to 49.4) in all-cause death, MI, or
all-cause stroke
(P=0.011).
Rehospitalization Rates
The number of patients hospitalized for ischemic events
(unstable angina, TIA, limb ischemia), bleeding events, either ischemic
or bleeding events, and all causes combined was reduced with
clopidogrel therapy
(Table 3
). The reduction in all-cause hospitalization was
driven principally by the reduction in hospitalization for ischemic
events. Although not statistically significant, the rate of study drug
discontinuation was lower for clopidogrel versus aspirin (28.8% versus
30.4%,
P=0.29).
|
Multivariate Modeling
Table 4
contains the multivariate model for the end point
of all-cause death, MI, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or all-cause
rehospitalization. Compared with aspirin, the RRR of an adverse event
in patients randomized to treatment with clopidogrel was 22.8% (95%
CI, 10.7 to 33.2; P=0.001).
Significant predictors of adverse events included age, diabetes,
congestive heart failure, angina, claudication, and prior
cerebrovascular event. The interaction term for the benefit of
clopidogrel for this composite end point in patients with a history of
previous cardiac surgery was highly significant
(P=0.0014). When the
multivariate analysis was confined to those ischemic and bleeding end
points that clopidogrel therapy might be expected to influence, the
benefit over aspirin was even more robust; the RRR with clopidogrel for
the composite end point of vascular death, MI, stroke, or
rehospitalization for ischemia or bleeding was 31.2% (95% CI, 15.8 to
43.8; P=0.0003). The
interaction term for the benefit of clopidogrel for this composite end
point was also significant
(P=0.015).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High-Risk Patients
This study confirms that patients who have undergone
previous cardiac surgery are at very high risk for recurrent vascular
events. Graft closure, superimposed on progression of native coronary
artery disease, can occur. In the patients receiving aspirin, 18.9%
were rehospitalized for ischemic events; even with the significant
reduction by clopidogrel, the rate was still 14.8%. In addition to
recurrent cardiac events, other arterial beds, in particular the
cerebral vasculature, are in jeopardy in these patients. Bleeding
episodes from prolonged antiplatelet therapy are an additional concern.
Compared with aspirin, clopidogrel significantly reduces
rehospitalization for angina, TIA, and peripheral arterial disease, the
respective precursors to MI, stroke, and amputation, while causing
fewer bleeding episodes. A previous analysis of CAPRIE demonstrated the
value of rehospitalization for ischemic events and bleeding as an end
point in comparing antiplatelet
therapies.12
The Need for Antithrombotic Therapy
Thrombotic occlusion of vein grafts is almost
inevitable with the passage of a sufficient period of
time.3 13 14
Long-term anticoagulant therapy, which is associated with substantial
bleeding risks, has not been definitively shown to prevent graft
closure.15 16 17 18 19
Antiplatelet therapy, however, can delay this
occurrence.4 5 20 21
Spontaneous embolization of atherothrombotic material also occurs in
saphenous vein grafts.22
Antiplatelet agents may play a role in preventing the initial thrombus
formation at the site of plaque and may minimize the impact of any
embolization that does occur by preventing secondary thrombotic
occlusion of the
microvasculature.23
Additionally, ADP receptor blockade has been shown to inhibit shear
stressinduced platelet aggregation more effectively than
aspirin.24 25 26 27 28
This latter mechanism may be particularly relevant in surgical
conduits, which are more likely to have perturbed blood flow patterns.
Progression of native disease may also occur and predispose to a
thrombotic event, again creating a role for the more potent
antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in these patients. There is also
mounting evidence that a significant proportion of patients undergoing
CABG may be aspirin
resistant.10 29
Depending on the population studied and the specific definition of
aspirin resistance, anywhere from 10% to 40% of patients appear to
have an inadequate antiplatelet response to aspirin. The ADP antagonist
ticlopidine has been evaluated in small studies and found to be
efficacious in patients with
CABG.30 31
However, the unfavorable side effect profile and small, but real,
possibility of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura make this drug
unappealing for long-term secondary
prevention.32 33 34 35 36
Thus, because of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability, clopidogrel
may be the ideal antiplatelet agent for post-CABG
patients.
Dual Therapy With Clopidogrel and
Aspirin
Furthermore, the combination of aspirin plus ADP
antagonism may result in even better outcomes than with clopidogrel
alone. Several experimental studies support the synergy of dual therapy
with an ADP antagonist and
aspirin.37 38 39 40 41 42 43
The combination of aspirin plus an ADP antagonist decreases fibrinogen
binding and platelet aggregation significantly more than either agent
alone. The present study shows that long-term therapy with clopidogrel
is superior to aspirin in patients who have had previous cardiac
surgery, without an increase in bleeding risks. Therefore, a randomized
trial of long-term therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin
(or clopidogrel) alone after CABG may be
warranted.
Study Limitations
The current subgroup analysis was not prespecified.
However, treatment with clopidogrel or aspirin was randomized. Data on
revascularization procedures during the study period were incomplete.
The exact date of the previous surgery was unknown; therefore, the mean
age of the bypass grafts could not be determined. The CAPRIE database
only identified patients as having a history of previous cardiac
surgery, without identifying the exact type of operative procedure. The
proportion of patients receiving either venous or arterial grafts could
not be determined. Currently, there is greater use of arterial grafts
than at the time of this study. Thus, the benefit of clopidogrel over
aspirin may be more (greater effect on platelet-rich arterial thrombus)
or less (fewer recurrent ischemic events in those with arterial grafts)
than seen in this analysis. Finally, all patients enrolled in CAPRIE
had a qualifying ischemic event, perhaps identifying a somewhat
higher-risk group than the typical cardiac surgery
patient.
Conclusions
Although in the overall trial of patients with
atherosclerosis the advantage of clopidogrel over aspirin was modest,
the high-risk population of prior cardiac surgery patients derived
particular and substantial benefit. These findings lend support for the
superiority of more potent antiplatelet antagonism induced by ADP
receptor blockade by clopidogrel over thromboxane inhibition by aspirin
in an appropriately selected population at high risk for recurrent
vascular events. The promise of further event reduction with dual
antiplatelet therapy may establish a new benchmark for optimal
secondary prevention in patients at elevated risk for ischemic
events.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 3, 2000; revision received September 6, 2000; accepted September 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:616626.[Abstract]
3.
Motwani JG, Topol
EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis,
predisposition, and prevention.
Circulation. 1998;97:916931.
4.
Goldman S, Copeland
J, Moritz T, et al. Improvement in early saphenous vein graft patency
after coronary artery bypass surgery with antiplatelet therapy: results
of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.
Circulation. 1988;77:13241332.
5.
Goldman S, Copeland
J, Moritz T, et al. Saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary
artery bypass surgery and effects of antiplatelet therapy: Results of a
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.
Circulation. 1989;80:11901197.
6.
Antiplatelet
Trialists Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials
of antiplatelet therapy, II: maintenance of vascular graft or arterial
patency by antiplatelet therapy.
BMJ. 1994;308:159168.
7. Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease. Med Clin North Am. 2000;84:163179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Yao SK, Ober JC,
McNatt J, et al. ADP plays an important role in mediating platelet
aggregation and cyclic flow variations in vivo in stenosed and
endothelium-injured canine coronary arteries.
Circ Res. 1992;70:3948.
9. Helgason CM, Bolin KM, Hoff JA, et al. Development of aspirin resistance in persons with previous ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:23312336.[Abstract]
10. Poggio ED, Kottke-Marchant K, Welsh PA, et al. The prevalence of aspirin resistance in cardiac patients as measured by platelet aggregation and the PFA-100. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:254A. Abstract.
11. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348:13291339.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Bhatt DL, Hirsch AT, Ringleb PA, et al. Reduction in the need for hospitalization for recurrent ischemic events and bleeding with clopidogrel instead of aspirin. Am Heart J. 2000;140:6773.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Walts AE, Fishbein MC, Matloff JM. Thrombosed, ruptured atheromatous plaques in saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: ten years experience. Am Heart J. 1987;114:718723.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Solymoss BC, Nadeau P, Millette D, et al. Late thrombosis of saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts related to risk factors. Circulation. 1988;78(suppl I):I-140I-143.
15. McEnany MT, Salzman EW, Mundth ED, et al. The effect of antithrombotic therapy on patency rates of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;83:8189.[Abstract]
16. van der Meer J, Hillege HL, Kootstra GJ, et al. Prevention of one-year vein-graft occlusion after aortocoronary-bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants: the CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Lancet. 1993;342:257264.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Stein PD, Dalen
JE, Goldman S, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with saphenous
vein and internal mammary artery bypass grafts.
Chest. 1995;108:424S430S.
18. Gohlke H, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Sturzenhofecker P, et al. Improved graft patency with anticoagulant therapy after aortocoronary bypass surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Circulation. 1981;64(suppl II):II-22II-27.
19.
Post Coronary
Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive
lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose
anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein
coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl
J Med. 1997;336:153162.
20.
Antiplatelet
Trialists Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials
of antiplatelet therapy, I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction,
and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of
patients. BMJ. 1994;308:81106.
21.
Goldman S,
Copeland J, Moritz T, et al. Long-term graft patency (3 years) after
coronary artery surgery: effects of aspirin: results of a VA
Cooperative Study. Circulation. 1994;89:11381143.
22. Trono R, Sutton C, Hollman J, et al. Multiple myocardial infarctions associated with atheromatous emboli after PTCA of saphenous vein grafts: a clinicopathologic correlation. Cleve Clin J Med. 1989;56:581584.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Topol EJ, Yadav
JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic
vascular disease. Circulation. 2000;101:570580.
24.
Makkar RR, Eigler
NL, Kaul S, et al. Effects of clopidogrel, aspirin and combined therapy
in a porcine ex vivo model of high-shear induced stent thrombosis.
Eur Heart J. 1998;19:15381546.
25. Taka T, Okano E, Seki J, et al. Effects of clopidogrel on platelet activation and coagulation of non-anticoagulated rat blood under high shear stress. Haemostasis. 1999;29:189196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Moake JL, Turner
NA, Stathopoulos NA, et al. Shear-induced platelet aggregation can be
mediated by vWF released from platelets, as well as by exogenous large
or unusually large vWF multimers, requires adenosine diphosphate, and
is resistant to aspirin. Blood. 1988;71:13661374.
27.
Bossavy JP,
Thalamas C, Sagnard L, et al. A double-blind randomized comparison of
combined aspirin and ticlopidine therapy versus aspirin or ticlopidine
alone on experimental arterial thrombogenesis in humans.
Blood. 1998;92:15181525.
28.
Cattaneo M,
Lombardi R, Bettega D, et al. Shear-induced platelet aggregation is
potentiated by desmopressin and inhibited by ticlopidine.
Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:393397.
29. Buchanan MR, Brister SJ. Individual variation in the effects of ASA on platelet function: implications for the use of ASA clinically. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11:221227.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Chevigne M, David JL, Rigo P, et al. Effect of ticlopidine on saphenous vein bypass patency rates: a double-blind study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984;37:371378.[Abstract]
31. Limet R, David JL, Magotteaux P, et al. Prevention of aorta-coronary bypass graft occlusion: beneficial effect of ticlopidine on early and late patency rates of venous coronary bypass grafts: a double-blind study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94:773783.[Abstract]
32. Love BB, Biller J, Gent M. Adverse hematological effects of ticlopidine: prevention, recognition and management. Drug Saf. 1998;19:8998.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Whetsel TR, Bell DM. Rash in patients receiving ticlopidine after intracoronary stent placement. Pharmacotherapy. 1999;19:228231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Bennett CL, Kiss JE, Weinberg PD, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura after stenting and ticlopidine. Lancet. 1998;352:10361037. Letter.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Page Y, Tardy B, Zeni F, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura related to ticlopidine. Lancet. 1991;337:774776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Steinhubl SR, Tan
WA, Foody JM, et al. Incidence and clinical course of thrombotic
thrombocytopenic purpura due to ticlopidine following coronary
stenting: EPISTENT Investigators: Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa
Inhibitor for Stenting. JAMA. 1999;281:806810.
37.
Rupprecht HJ,
Darius H, Borkowski U, et al. Comparison of antiplatelet effects of
aspirin, ticlopidine, or their combination after stent implantation.
Circulation. 1998;97:10461052.
38.
Harker LA, Marzec
UM, Kelly AB, et al. Clopidogrel inhibition of stent, graft, and
vascular thrombogenesis with antithrombotic enhancement by aspirin in
nonhuman primates. Circulation. 1998;98:24612469.
39.
Bertrand ME,
Legrand V, Boland J, et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of
conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned
and elective coronary stenting: the Full Anticoagulation Versus Aspirin
and Ticlopidine (FANTASTIC) study.
Circulation. 1998;98:15971603.
40.
Urban P, Macaya
C, Rupprecht HJ, et al. Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus
antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk
patients: the Multicenter Aspirin and Ticlopidine Trial After
Intracoronary Stenting (MATTIS).
Circulation. 1998;98:21262132.
41.
Schomig A,
Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet
and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery
stents. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:10841089.
42.
Leon MB, Baim DS,
Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug
regimens after coronary-artery stenting: Stent Anticoagulation
Restenosis Study Investigators. N
Engl J Med. 1998;339:16651671.
43.
Muller C, Buttner
HJ, Petersen J, et al. A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and
aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after the placement of
coronary-artery stents.
Circulation. 2000;101:590593.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Bjessmo Increased rehospitalization rate after coronary bypass operation for acute coronary syndrome: a prospective study in 200 patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1148 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. O'Riordan, R. J. Margey, G. Blake, and P. R. O'Connell Antiplatelet Agents in the Perioperative Period Arch Surg, January 1, 2009; 144(1): 69 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Talelli and R. J. Greenwood Review: Recurrent stroke: where do we stand with the secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic strokes? Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 387 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. Newsome, R. S. Weller, J. C. Gerancher, M. A. Kutcher, and R. L. Royster Coronary Artery Stents: II. Perioperative Considerations and Management Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 570 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dunning, M. Versteegh, A. Fabbri, A. Pavie, P. Kolh, U. Lockowandt, S. A.M. Nashef, and on behalf of the EACTS Audit and Guidelines Commit Guideline on antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 73 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Zimmermann, E. Gams, and T. Hohlfeld Aspirin in coronary artery bypass surgery: new aspects of and alternatives for an old antithrombotic agent. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 93 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Englberger, M. Streich, H. Tevaearai, and T. P. Carrel Different anticoagulation strategies in off-pump coronary artery bypass operations: a European survey Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2008; 7(3): 378 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Becker, T. W. Meade, P. B. Berger, M. Ezekowitz, C. M. O'Connor, D. A. Vorchheimer, G. H. Guyatt, D. B. Mark, and R. A. Harrington The Primary and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 776S - 814S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. BAKHRU and D. L. BHATT INTERPRETING THE CHARISMA STUDY: What is the role of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, April 1, 2008; 75(4): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Badger, C. V. Soong, B. Lee, G. R. Swain, and K. E. McGuigan Prescribing Practice of General Practitioners in Northern Ireland for Peripheral Arterial Disease Angiology, March 1, 2008; 59(1): 57 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Shim, Y. S. Choi, Y. J. Oh, S. O. Bang, K. J. Yoo, and Y. L. Kwak Effects of preoperative aspirin and clopidogrel therapy on perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 59 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Meadows and D. L. Bhatt Clinical Aspects of Platelet Inhibitors and Thrombus Formation Circ. Res., May 11, 2007; 100(9): 1261 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Aronow Use of Antiplatelet Drugs in Secondary Prevention in Older Persons With Atherothrombotic Disease J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2007; 62(5): 518 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. de Oliveira and D. L. Bhatt Clinical evaluation of clopidogrel across the whole spectrum of indications: primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2006; 8(suppl_G): G10 - G14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Diener Update on clopidogrel and dual anti-platelet therapy: neurology Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2006; 8(suppl_G): G15 - G19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Wang, D. L. Bhatt, and E. J. Topol Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical entity Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2006; 27(6): 647 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Halkos, W. A. Cooper, R. Petersen, J. D. Puskas, O. M. Lattouf, J. M. Craver, and R. A. Guyton Early Administration of Clopidogrel Is Safe After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 815 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Gurbuz, A. A. Zia, A. C. Vuran, H. Cui, and A. Aytac Postoperative clopidogrel improves mid-term outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Poston, C. White, J. Gu, J. Brown, J. Gammie, R. N. Pierson, A. Lee, I. Connerney, T. Avari, R. Christenson, et al. Aprotinin Shows Both Hemostatic and Antithrombotic Effects During Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 104 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Kirshner, J. Biller, and A. S. Callahan III Long-Term Therapy to Prevent Stroke J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 528 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Cannon, S. R. Mehta, and S. F. Aranki Balancing the Benefit and Risk of Oral Antiplatelet Agents in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 768 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Donnelly Antiplatelet therapy and prevention of ischaemic events: CAPRIE The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, July 1, 2005; 5(4): 203 - 206. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Saseen ASHP Therapeutic Position Statement on the Daily Use of Aspirin for Preventing Cardiovascular Events Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2005; 62(13): 1398 - 1405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Bhatt and J. Hirsh The (Variable) Definition of Benefit in the Case of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin--Reply Arch Intern Med, June 13, 2005; 165(11): 1310 - 1311. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Gluckman, J. J. Rade, and S. P. Schulman The Value of Clopidogrel Administered Postoperatively Following a Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2297 - 2297. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Lansky, J. S. Hochman, P. A. Ward, G. S. Mintz, R. Fabunmi, P. B. Berger, G. New, C. L. Grines, C. G. Pietras, M. J. Kern, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy in Women: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 940 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hirsh and D. L. Bhatt Comparative Benefits of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in High-Risk Patient Populations: Lessons From the CAPRIE and CURE Studies Arch Intern Med, October 25, 2004; 164(19): 2106 - 2110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lim, J. Cornelissen, T. Routledge, S. Kirtland, S. C. Charman, S. Bellm, H. Munday, O. Khan, I. Masood, and S. Large Clopidogrel did not inhibit platelet function early after coronary bypass surgery: A prospective randomized trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2004; 128(3): 432 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Stein, H. J. Schunemann, J. E. Dalen, and D. Gutterman Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Saphenous Vein and Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 600S - 608S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Englberger, B. Faeh, P. A. Berdat, F. Eberli, B. Meier, and T. Carrel Impact of clopidogrel in coronary artery bypass grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 96 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Nagarajan, P. S. Lewis, and J. Dunning Is clopidogrel beneficial following coronary bypass surgery? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2004; 3(2): 311 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Bhatt Aspirin resistance: more than just a laboratory curiosity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2004; 43(6): 1127 - 1129. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Ringleb, D. L. Bhatt, A. T. Hirsch, E. J. Topol, W. Hacke, and for the CAPRIE Investigators Benefit of Clopidogrel Over Aspirin Is Amplified in Patients With a History of Ischemic Events Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 528 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Foody, F. D. Ferdinand, D. Galusha, S. S. Rathore, F. A. Masoudi, E. P. Havranek, D. Nilasena, M. J. Radford, and H. M. Krumholz Patterns of Secondary Prevention in Older Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting During Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-24 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kurlansky Is there a hypercoagulable state after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? What do we know and what can we do? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 7 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jneid, D. L. Bhatt, R. Corti, J. J. Badimon, V. Fuster, and G. S. Francis Aspirin and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Therapeutic Insights From the CURE Study Arch Intern Med, May 26, 2003; 163(10): 1145 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chaturvedi Should the Multicenter Carotid Endarterectomy Trials Be Repeated? Arch Neurol, May 1, 2003; 60(5): 774 - 775. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Hongo, J. Ley, S. E. Dick, and R. R. Yee The effect of clopidogrel incombination with aspirin whengiven before coronary artery bypass grafting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2002; 40(2): 231 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Kapur and I S Malik Is surgery still the preferred option for coronary revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease? Heart, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 407 - 409. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ehlers, T. W. Felbinger, H. K. Eltzschig, L. A. Fleisher, and K. A. Eagle Lowering Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., April 4, 2002; 346(14): 1096 - 1097. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Labinaz, R. Kilaru, K. Pieper, S. P. Marso, M. M. Kitt, M. L. Simoons, R. M. Califf, E. J. Topol, P. W. Armstrong, and R. A. Harrington Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Results From the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) Trial Circulation, January 22, 2002; 105(3): 322 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Bhatt, M. E. Bertrand, P. B. Berger, P. L. L'Allier, I. Moussa, J. W. Moses, G. Dangas, M. Taniuchi, J. M. Lasala, D. R. Holmes, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 9 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W.A. Verheugt, D. L. Bhatt, D. P. Chew, E. J. Topol, A. T. Hirsch, W. Hacke, and P. A. Ringleb Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin After Cardiac Surgery Response Circulation, September 25, 2001; 104 (13): e76 - e76. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W Groeneveld and M. A Hlatky Clopidogrel reduced recurrent ischaemic events in patients with previous cardiac surgery more than aspirin Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2001; 6(4): 114 - 114. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Clopidogrel Better Than Aspirin After Bypass Surgery Journal Watch Cardiology, April 6, 2001; 2001(406): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |