| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:2885.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Division of Molecular Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine IV (M.V., S.F., K.A., A.A., A.M.Z., S.D.) and the Department of Hematology, Internal Medicine III (H.M.), University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany.
Correspondence to Andreas M. Zeiher, MD, Dept of Internal Medicine IV, University of Frankfurt, Theodor Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany. E-mail Zeiher{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and
ResultsFifteen patients with angiographically
documented stable coronary artery disease (CAD) were
prospectively treated with 40 mg of atorvastatin per day for 4 weeks.
Before and weekly after the initiation of statin therapy, EPCs were
isolated from peripheral blood and counted. In addition,
the number of hematopoietic precursor cells positive for CD34, CD133,
and CD34/kinase insert domain receptor was analyzed.
Statin treatment of patients with stable CAD was associated with an
1.5-fold increase in the number of circulating EPCs by 1 week after
initiation of treatment; this was followed by sustained increased
levels to
3-fold throughout the 4-week study period. Moreover, the
number of CD34/kinase insert domain receptorpositive hematopoietic
progenitor cells was significantly augmented after 4 weeks of therapy.
Atorvastatin treatment increased the further functional activity of
EPCs, as assessed by their migratory
capacity.
ConclusionThe results of the present study define a novel mechanism of action of statin treatment in patients with stable CAD: the augmentation of circulating EPCs with enhanced functional activity. Given the well-established role of EPCs of participating in repair after ischemic injury, stimulation of EPCs by statins may contribute to the clinical benefit of statin therapy in patients with CAD.
Key Words: coronary disease angiogenesis endothelium
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therapeutic neovascularization may constitute an important way to salvage tissue from critical ischemia.9 Neovascularization in the adult is thought to result exclusively from the migration and proliferation of preexisting, fully differentiated endothelial cells (a process referred to as angiogenesis).10 Recent studies, however, demonstrated that circulating bone marrowderived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) home to sites of neovascularization and differentiate into endothelial cells in situ11 12 in a manner consistent with a process termed vasculogenesis.13 Importantly, mobilization of bone marrow-derived EPCs augments the neovascularization of ischemic tissue,14 thus suggesting that the mobilization of EPCs might represent a useful strategy for clinical therapy of ischemic heart disease.
Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that statin therapy might augment circulating EPCs in patients with stable CAD.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The age-matched healthy control group (n=9) consisted of 3 women and 6 men with a mean age of 60±5.3 years without any evidence of CAD by history and physical examination. In an additional 5 healthy volunteers (mean age 36±6.3 years), EPC kinetics were investigated 3 times over a 4-week period to assess any potential spontaneously occurring changes in EPC numbers.
Study Protocol
The 15 study patients received 40 mg of atorvastatin
(Pfizer) per day over 4 weeks. Before and weekly after the initiation
of statin therapy, 40 mL of venous blood was collected to measure
circulating EPCs, serum cholesterol levels, and vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis
factor-
(TNF-
), and granulocyte macrophage
colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) serum levels. Informed consent was
obtained from all patients and healthy volunteers, and the study
protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University
of Frankfurt.
EPC Culture Assay
Mononuclear cells were isolated by density-gradient
centrifugation with Biocoll from 20 mL of
peripheral blood. Immediately after isolation,
4x106 mononuclear cells were plated
on 24-well culture dishes coated with human fibronectin and gelatin
(Sigma) and maintained in
endothelial basal medium (EBM, CellSystems)
supplemented with EGM SingleQuots and 20% FCS. After 4 days in
culture, nonadherent cells were removed by a thorough washing with PBS,
and adherent cells underwent cytochemical
analysis.
Characterization of EPCs
To detect the uptake of
1,1'dioctadecyl3,3,3',3'tetramethylindocarbocyaninelabeled
acetylated low-density lipoprotein (DiLDL), cells were
incubated with DiLDL (2.4 µg/mL) at 37°C for 1 hour. Cells were
then fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes,
and lectin staining was performed by incubation with
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)labeled Ulex europaeus
agglutinin I (lectin, 10 µg/mL; Sigma)
for 1 hour. After the staining, samples were viewed with an inverted
fluorescent microscope (Zeiss).
Dual-stained cells positive for both lectin and DiLDL were judged to be
EPCs, and they were counted per well. Two to three independent
investigators evaluated the number of EPCs per well by counting 3
randomly selected high-power
fields.15
To detect the expression of endothelial marker proteins, EPCs were detached with 1 mmol/L EDTA in PBS, followed by repeated gentle flushing through a pipette tip. Cells were incubated for 15 minutes with phycoerythrin-labeled monoclonal antibodies against human kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) (Sigma) and human vascular endotheliumcadherin and a FITClabeled monoclonal antibody against von Willebrand factor. After treatment, the cells were lysed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. CD14-positive monocytes were obtained by positive selection with CD14 immunomagnetic microbeads (Milteny, Biotech) using an automagnetic cell sorting cell separation device. Single and 2-color flow cytometric analysis were performed using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) SCAN flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
Flow Cytometry Analysis
A volume of 100 µL of peripheral blood
was incubated for 15 minutes in the dark with monoclonal antibodies
against human KDR (Sigma), the FITC-labeled
monoclonal antibody against human CD45 (Becton
Dickinson), the phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal
antibody against human CD133 (Milteny), and the FITC- or
phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibody against human CD34
(Becton Dickinson). Isotype-identical antibodies
served as controls (IgG1-phycoerythrin and IgG2a-FITC,
Becton Dickinson). Each analysis
included 60 000 events.
Migration Assay
Isolated EPCs were detached using 1 mmol/L EDTA
in PBS (pH 7.4), harvested by centrifugation,
resuspended in 500 µL of EBM, counted, and placed in the upper
chamber of a modified Boyden chamber. The chamber was placed in a
24-well culture dish containing EBM and human recombinant VEGF (50
ng/mL). After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, the lower side of the
filter was washed with PBS and fixed with 2%
paraformaldehyde. For quantification, cell nuclei were
stained with 4',6-diamidino-phenylidole. Migrating cells into the lower
chamber were counted manually in 3 random microscopic
fields.16
Serum VEGF, GM-CSF, and TNF levels
Serum levels of the cytokines were measured
by a high-sensitive ELISA assay (R&D Systems)
according to the manufacturers instructions. Samples were checked by
serial dilution, and measurements were performed at least in
duplicate.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Continuous
variables were tested for normal distribution with the
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and compared by 1-way ANOVA. Categorical
variables were compared using the
2
test and the Fisher exact test. In the case of non-normal distribution,
nonparametric tests were used (Mann-Whitney U test or
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks). Differences in EPC number and FACS
parameters were examined by repeated-measures ANOVA. Linear
regression analysis and nonparametric bivariate
correlation (Spearman rank correlation coefficient) were used to
compare increases in EPCs versus a reduction of LDL
cholesterol levels. Statistical significance was assumed if
a null hypothesis could be rejected at
P<0.05. All statistical
analyses were performed with SPSS for
Windows 7.0.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Before initiating statin therapy, the number of EPCs was
lower but not significantly reduced in patients with CAD (190±49
EPCs/mm2) compared with age-matched healthy
controls (310±55 EPCs/mm2,
P=0.052). Treatment with 40 mg
of atorvastatin per day was associated with a significant increase in
the number of circulating EPC in patients with CAD
(Figure 2
, P<0.05
for trend). As illustrated in
Figure 2A
, a significant
(P=0.016),
1.5-fold increase
in EPCs was observed after only 1 week of treatment; this was followed
by a further increase to 3-fold at week 2 and was sustained at >4-fold
throughout the 4-week study period. In addition, atorvastatin treatment
also augmented EPC numbers in 3 healthy volunteers (3 men aged 50±11
years) from 318±68 to 494±68 and 677±101
EPCs/mm2 after 1 and 3 weeks, respectively
(P<0.05). In contrast,
repeated measurements of circulating EPCs in 5 healthy control subjects
without statin treatment over a 4-week period revealed essentially
identical values (331±46, 305±29, and 287±50
EPCs/mm2 at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks,
respectively). Thus, statin treatment significantly augments the number
of circulating EPC within 1 week of treatment.
|
Effect of Atorvastatin on Hematopoietic
Progenitor Cells
EPCs are thought to derive from CD34-positive
hematopoietic progenitor
cells.11 17 18 19
The subset of endothelial precursor cells is
characterized by the coexpression of endothelial marker
proteins such as VEGF receptor 2
(KDR).17 18 19
The baseline number of circulating CD34/KDR-positive cells was reduced
in patients with CAD compared with healthy age-matched volunteers
(0.0173±0.004% versus 0.029±0.006% in healthy controls,
P=0.116).
Treatment with atorvastatin led to a increase in
CD34/KDR-positive cells starting 7 days after initiating treatment
(Figure 3
). In contrast, the overall number of circulating
CD34-positve cells did not change during the treatment period
(0.067±0.01% at baseline versus 0.076±0.013% after 4 weeks,
P=NS). Likewise, the number of
CD133-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells, which represent
a more immature subset of CD34-positive cells, remained unchanged
(0.07±0.012% versus 0.05±0.009% after 4 weeks,
P=NS). Finally, atorvastatin
treatment did not affect the total number of mononuclear cells
(0.82±0.08x106 cells/mL versus
0.85±0.09x106 cells/mL after 4 weeks,
P=NS). Again, in healthy
control subjects without statin treatment, all parameters
tested remained constant during the observation period, whereas statin
treatment in 3 healthy volunteers significantly increased the number of
CD34/KDR-positive cells to 365% after 3 weeks of treatment
(P=0.028). Thus, a 4-week
period of statin treatment seems to stimulate the differentiation of
CD34-positive cells into EPCs rather than to augment the numbers of
circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells.
|
Effects of Atorvastatin on the Migratory
Capacity of Isolated EPCs
To assess the potential functional effects of statin
therapy on EPCs, we analyzed the migratory capacity of isolated
EPCs in response to VEGF in a subset of 12 patients before and after 3
and 4 weeks of treatment with 40 mg of atorvastatin per day. At
baseline, patients with stable CAD had lower numbers of migrating EPCs
than healthy volunteers (11±5.8 versus 31.9±4.8 migrating EPCs per
high-power field, respectively,
P<0.05). As illustrated in
Figure 4
, atorvastatin treatment significantly augmented the
migration of isolated EPCs from 11.5±5.9 to 34.6±13.5 migrating
EPCs/high power field after 3 weeks
(P=0.009). Thus, statin therapy
increases the number of circulating EPCs and stimulates the functional
activity of these cells.
|
Effects of Atorvastatin on Serum
Cholesterol and Cytokine Levels
Treatment with 40 mg of atorvastatin per day
resulted in a decrease in LDL serum cholesterol levels
(Figure 5
). However, neither the absolute number of EPCs at
baseline nor the EPC kinetics during treatment correlated with LDL
cholesterol levels
(r=0.377,
P=0.165) or statin-induced
changes in LDL cholesterol serum levels
(r=-0.017,
P=0.955;
r=0.134,
P=0.694; and
r=-0.199,
P=496 at 1, 2, and 3 weeks,
respectively). In addition, statin treatment did not affect serum
levels of VEGF, GM-CSF, or TNF-
(Table 2
), which all modulate EPC mobilization or
angiogenesis in
vivo.14 20 21
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the proportional contribution of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis to the neovascularization of adult tissue remains to be determined, it is well established that EPCs participate in repair after ischemic injury. Experimental hindlimb ischemia in mice increases the number of circulating EPCs by >400%.14 The angiogenic growth factor VEGF, which is upregulated in the ischemic myocardium of patients with myocardial infarction,22 has been shown to mobilize EPCs in both mice and men.16 20 Finally and most importantly, transplantation of blood-derived EPCs significantly augmented ischemia-induced neovascularization of the hindlimb23 24 and promoted limb salvage in nude mice.15 Thus, the finding that statin therapy augments the number of circulating EPCs in patients with CAD implies that vasculogenesis may contribute to statin-mediated repair after ischemic injury, which was very recently demonstrated for the rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia.8
Upregulation of angiogenic growth factors constitutes a
fundamental survival response to tissue ischemia. Therefore,
VEGF seems to be a key regulatory cytokine orchestrating
endogenous neovascularization by modulating
endothelial cell migration and proliferation and
circulating cellular
elements.9 Recent
experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that VEGF affects
endothelial cell migration and proliferation and
significantly alters the kinetics of
EPCs.11 20
Treating mice with recombinant human VEGF165
increases the number of EPCs by 245% and 214% after 1 and 4 days,
respectively.16 Likewise, in
patients with critical limb ischemia receiving VEGF gene
transfer, the number of EPCs increased by 154% and 153% at days 14
and 28 after treatment, respectively, in parallel with an
2-fold
increase in VEGF plasma
levels.20 In the present
study using a culture assay identical to one used previously to
quantify circulating EPC kinetics, a >3-fold increase in circulating
EPCs was observed 2 weeks after initiating atorvastatin treatment in
patients with stable CAD. Thus, the effects of statin therapy in
augmenting circulating EPCs seem to be at least comparable to the
effects of exogenous VEGF administration.
The mechanisms mediating the effects of statins on EPC
kinetics in humans remain to be determined. Our data suggest that the
modulation of EPC kinetics after statin treatment is unrelated to the
decrease in serum LDL cholesterol levels. In a manner
similar to the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor
cells,25 cytokines
like GM-CSF have also been shown to exert potent stimulatory effects on
EPC kinetics.14 However, in
the present study, atorvastatin did not affect the serum levels of
GM-CSF or TNF-
in patients with CAD. Likewise, VEGF serum levels did
not significantly change during atorvastatin treatment. It is known
that statins can regulate a variety of intracellular signaling
pathways, including Rho GTPase, thereby stabilizing
endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) mRNA
levels.7 Moreover, statins
were recently shown to stimulate the protein kinase
Akt,8 which activates
the enzymatic activity of
eNOS,26 27
mediates VEGF-induced endothelial cell
migration,28 29
and thereby plays an important role in mature
endothelial
cells.30 Thus, one may
speculate that statin-induced stimulation of the Akt/eNOS pathway might
contribute to the observed effects of statins on the functional
improvement of EPCs.
Obviously, because of the limitations imposed by studying patients, we cannot determine the molecular pathway(s) responsible for statin-induced augmentation in circulating EPCs in our patients with stable CAD. Moreover, because of the potent beneficial effect of statins in normocholesterolemic patients with CAD, a placebo control group cannot be provided for ethical reasons. However, the finding that statin therapy also increases EPC levels in healthy volunteers, whereas EPC levels remained unchanged in the untreated healthy control group, supports the hypothesis that statins directly affect EPC levels.
Interestingly, patients with CAD revealed reduced EPC numbers and migration. Although the data did not reach statistical significance with respect to EPC levels, one may speculate that individual risk factors contribute to the impairment of EPC numbers and function. Further studies with larger patient numbers are required to elucidate the potential contribution of specific risk factors for CAD on EPC number and function.
In conclusion, the results of the present study define a novel mechanism of action of statin treatment in patients with stable CAD: namely, the augmentation of circulating EPCs with enhanced functional activity. Our data further suggest that statin treatment seems to stimulate the differentiation of a subset of endothelial precursor cells into EPCs rather than augmenting the number of circulating hematopoietic stem cells. Given the well-established role of EPCs participating in repair after ischemic injury, the mobilization of EPCs by statins may contribute to the clinical benefit of statin therapy in patients with CAD, in addition to the effects of statins on serum cholesterol levels and atherosclerotic plaque stabilization. The potential of statins to improve the neovascularization of ischemic tissue suggests that statin therapy may support one of the most fundamental survival responses to maintain tissue viability in the face of acute or chronic myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive CAD. In fact, statin therapy was recently shown to rapidly enhance coronary blood flow in patients with stable CAD31 and to reduce myocardial ischemia after an acute ischemic episode within a few weeks of treatment.32
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 27, 2001; revision received May 11, 2001; accepted May 11, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-K. Han, H.-S. Lee, H.-M. Yang, J. Hur, S.-I. Jun, J.-Y. Kim, C.-H. Cho, G.-Y. Koh, J. M. Peters, K.-W. Park, et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{delta} Agonist Enhances Vasculogenesis by Regulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells Through Genomic and Nongenomic Activations of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway Circulation, September 2, 2008; 118(10): 1021 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Surdacki, E. Marewicz, E. Wieteska, G. Szastak, T. Rakowski, E. Wieczorek-Surdacka, D. Dudek, J. Pryjma, and J. S. Dubiel Association between endothelial progenitor cell depletion in blood and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency in stable angina Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2265 - 2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dimmeler and A. Leri Aging and Disease as Modifiers of Efficacy of Cell Therapy Circ. Res., June 6, 2008; 102(11): 1319 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rodriguez-Yanez, J. Agulla, R. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, T. Sobrino, and J. Castillo Review: Statins and stroke Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 157 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Povsic and P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont Review: Endothelial progenitor cells: markers of vascular reparative capacity Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 199 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thill, N. V. Strunnikova, M. J. Berna, N. Gordiyenko, K. Schmid, S. W. Cousins, D. J. S. Thompson, and K. G. Csaky Late Outgrowth Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2696 - 2708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Purhonen, J. Palm, D. Rossi, N. Kaskenpaa, I. Rajantie, S. Yla-Herttuala, K. Alitalo, I. L. Weissman, and P. Salven Bone marrow-derived circulating endothelial precursors do not contribute to vascular endothelium and are not needed for tumor growth PNAS, May 6, 2008; 105(18): 6620 - 6625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shao, Y. Tan, D. Eton, Z. Yang, M. G. Uberti, S. Li, A. Schulick, and H. Yu Statin and Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Additively Promote Angiogenesis by Enhancement of Progenitor Cells Incorporation into New Vessels Stem Cells, May 1, 2008; 26(5): 1376 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Foteinos, Y. Hu, Q. Xiao, B. Metzler, and Q. Xu Rapid Endothelial Turnover in Atherosclerosis-Prone Areas Coincides With Stem Cell Repair in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Circulation, April 8, 2008; 117(14): 1856 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. F. Van Craenenbroeck, C. J. Vrints, S. E. Haine, K. Vermeulen, I. Goovaerts, V. F. I. Van Tendeloo, V. Y. Hoymans, and V. M. A. Conraads A maximal exercise bout increases the number of circulating CD34+/KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells in healthy subjects. Relation with lipid profile J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1006 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schlieper, M. Hristov, V. Brandenburg, T. Kruger, R. Westenfeld, A. H. Mahnken, E. Yagmur, G. Boecker, N. Heussen, U. Gladziwa, et al. Predictors of low circulating endothelial progenitor cell numbers in haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 19, 2008; (2008) gfn103v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Whittaker, J. S. Moore, M. Vasa-Nicotera, S. Stevens, and N. J. Samani Evidence for genetic regulation of endothelial progenitor cells and their role as biological markers of atherosclerotic susceptibility Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 332 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W Wojakowski, M Kucia, M Kazmierski, M Z Ratajczak, and M Tendera Circulating progenitor cells in stable coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes: relevant reparatory mechanism? Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 27 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Muller, A. Kazakov, A. Semenov, M. Bohm, and U. Laufs Pressure-induced cardiac overload induces upregulation of endothelial and myocardial progenitor cells Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2008; 77(1): 151 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Brunner, H. D. Theiss, A. Murr, T. Negele, and W.-M. Franz Primary hyperparathyroidism is associated with increased circulating bone marrow-derived progenitor cells Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1670 - E1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Thum, F. Fleissner, I. Klink, D. Tsikas, M. Jakob, J. Bauersachs, and D. O. Stichtenoth Growth Hormone Treatment Improves Markers of Systemic Nitric Oxide Bioavailability via Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4172 - 4179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gossl, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman Frontiers in Nephrology: Early Atherosclerosis A View Beyond the Lumen J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 2836 - 2842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tongers and D. W. Losordo Frontiers in Nephrology: The Evolving Therapeutic Applications of Endothelial Progenitor Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 2843 - 2852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Grisar, D. Aletaha, C. W Steiner, T. Kapral, S. Steiner, M. Saemann, I. Schwarzinger, B. Buranyi, G. Steiner, and J. S Smolen Endothelial progenitor cells in active rheumatoid arthritis: effects of tumour necrosis factor and glucocorticoid therapy Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1284 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Zaca, S. Rastogi, M. Imai, M. Wang, V. G. Sharov, A. Jiang, S. Goldstein, and H. N. Sabbah Chronic Monotherapy With Rosuvastatin Prevents Progressive Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Remodeling in Dogs With Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2007; 50(6): 551 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Daemen and P. W. Serruys Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part I: A Survey of Current and Future Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Meaningful Advances or More of the Same? Circulation, July 17, 2007; 116(3): 316 - 328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Theiss, R. David, M. G. Engelmann, A. Barth, K. Schotten, M. Naebauer, B. Reichart, G. Steinbeck, and W.-M. Franz Circulation of CD34+ progenitor cell populations in patients with idiopathic dilated and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (DCM and ICM) Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2007; 28(10): 1258 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L.T. Ballard and J. M. Edelberg Stem Cells and the Regeneration of the Aging Cardiovascular System Circ. Res., April 27, 2007; 100(8): 1116 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Westerweel, I. E. Hoefer, P. J. Blankestijn, P. de Bree, D. Groeneveld, O. van Oostrom, B. Braam, H. A. Koomans, and M. C. Verhaar End-stage renal disease causes an imbalance between endothelial and smooth muscle progenitor cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): F1132 - F1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Deanfield, J. P. Halcox, and T. J. Rabelink Endothelial Function and Dysfunction: Testing and Clinical Relevance Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1285 - 1295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Roberts, Q. Xiao, G. Weir, Q. Xu, and M. Jahangiri Endothelial Progenitor Cells are Mobilized After Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 598 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||