Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:2882-2884
doi: 10.1161/hc2401.092234
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belohlavek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seward, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belohlavek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seward, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Imaging

(Circulation. 2001;103:2882.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

Rapid Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Clinically Feasible Alternative for Precise and Accurate Measurement of Left Ventricular Volumes

Marek Belohlavek, MD, PhD; Kazuaki Tanabe, MD, PhD; Decho Jakrapanichakul, MD; Jerome F. Breen, MD; James B. Seward, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (M.B., K.T., D.J., J.B.S.) and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.F.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Clinical applicability of conventional ultrasonographic systems using mechanical adapters for 3D echocardiographic imaging has been limited by long acquisition and processing times. We developed a rapid (6-s) acquisition technique that collects apical tomograms using a continuously internally rotating transthoracic transducer. This study was performed to examine the clinical feasibility of rapid-acquisition 3D echocardiography to estimate left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes using electron-beam computed tomography as the reference standard.

Methods and Results—We collected a series of 6 to 11 apical echocardiographic tomograms, depending on heart rate, in 11 patients. There was good correlation, low variability, and low bias between rapid 3D echocardiography and electron-beam computed tomography for measuring left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.96; standard error of the estimate, 21.34 mL; bias, -4.93 mL) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (r=0.96; standard error of the estimate, 14.78 mL; bias, -6.97 mL).

Conclusions—The rapid-acquisition 3D echocardiography extends the use of a multiplane, internally rotating handheld transducer so that it becomes a precise and clinically feasible tool for assessing left ventricular volumes and function. A rapid-image acquisition time of 6 s would allow repeated image collection during the course of a clinical echocardiographic examination. Additional work must address rapid and automated data processing.


Key Words: echocardiography • ventricles • tomography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Three-dimensional echocardiography has demonstrated superior accuracy and reproducibility over conventional 2D echocardiography for measuring left ventricular (LV) volume, because no geometric assumptions are necessary about LV shape.1 Real-time volumetric 3D echocardiography2 with a very fast, internally rotating crystal array for real-time 3D imaging,3 various mechanical adapters for rotation or translation with conventional transthoracic echocardiography transducers,4 or free-hand 3D image acquisition with magnetic5 or spark-gap6 spatial positioning systems were investigated in an effort to use the 3D approach in a clinical setting. However, the clinical application of these techniques is not widespread because of compromised image quality, challenging technical design, or slow acquisition times. The initial experience with a prototype handheld transducer with an internally rotating crystal array for multiplane image acquisition was reported recently.7 The transthoracic echocardiography transducer is comparable in size to conventional probes and is stable during multitomographic data acquisition, because the rotating crystal array is not in direct contact with the body surface.

Using the 180° continuous-rotation mode of the multiplane transducer, we developed a rapid 3D image-acquisition technique that addresses the issue of clinical practicality of 3D echocardiography.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical feasibility and the precision and accuracy of the new rapid, 3D echocardiographic acquisition technique for measuring LV end-diastolic (LVEDV) and end-systolic (LVESV) volumes. Electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) was used as the reference standard.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
We performed a rapid 3D apical scan in patients for whom a standard transthoracic echocardiographic examination was clinically indicated. Patients with a variety of cardiac pathologies were considered in an attempt to cover a large range of LV volumes. Exclusion criteria were cardiac arrhythmias, sinus bradycardia, and any clinical condition preventing 6 s of suspended respiration. Thirteen patients entered the study; echocardiographic data from 2 patients were excluded because the image quality from remote myocardial regions was not adequate for determining the endocardial border. In the other 11 patients (8 men; mean age, 54 years; range, 36 to 68 years), the clinical transthoracic echocardiographic study was requested for ischemic heart disease (n=2), mitral regurgitation (n=2), aortic regurgitation (n=2), cardiac amyloidosis (n=1), constrictive pericarditis (n=1), pulmonary fibrosis (n=1), and pulmonary hypertension (n=1). In the final patient, LV function was evaluated before liver transplantation. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Foundation. Informed consent was obtained before the study from all patients.

3D Echocardiographic Study
We used a HP 2500 system (Hewlett-Packard) fitted with a prototype 5-MHz multiplane transthoracic transducer. An internal crystal array continuously rotates and collects images over 180° about its imaging axis. The desired diastolic and systolic tomograms are selected during subsequent off-line data processing on the basis of a synchronously acquired electrocardiographic signal. The number of tomograms obtained from the 6-s 180° rotation cycle depends on the patient’s heart rate. For example, with a rate of 80 beats/min, 8 tomograms are obtained. The end-diastolic (temporally related to the R wave on the ECG) and end-systolic (smallest chamber volume during the cardiac cycle) phases were identified at each cardiac cycle. Images were digitized, and LV endocardial borders were traced manually, including the LV outflow tract up to the aortic valve. The mitral valve plane was traced as the straight line between the boundaries of the mitral annulus. Two independent observers (K.T. and D.J.), who were blinded to the LV volumes obtained with the reference EBCT measurements, performed endocardial diastolic and systolic tracings, which took about 20 minutes per left ventricle. The LVEDV and LVESV were measured from computer-generated LV cavity casts, which were reconstructed from the interactive tracings using the Sun SPARC station 20 and a custom software algorithm; this took another 15 minutes.

EBCT Study
Each EBCT (Imatron C-100) study was performed within 48 hours of the echocardiographic examination. Each subject was positioned in the scanner to obtain parallel tomographic images in the short axis (transverse cardiac) from the LV apex to the base of the right ventricular outflow tract. During imaging, an intravenous infusion of nonionic contrast medium was delivered at 3 mL/s for 20 s. Eight to 12 parallel tomographic scans were obtained from the LV apex through the base, depending on the overall long-axis dimensions of the ventricle. The endocardial borders were traced manually, and the LVEDV and LVESV were obtained using a disk summation method.

Statistical Evaluation
To assess precision, LV volumes estimated from rapid 3D echocardiography by 2 independent observers were averaged and compared with those measured with EBCT by linear regression. Interobserver variability was expressed as the coefficient of variation between the 2 observers. To determine whether the difference in the values between the 2 methods was statistically significant, a paired t test was performed; the level of significance was set to P<0.05. The accuracy of the rapid 3D echocardiography with respect to the EBCT measurements was examined by a limits-of-agreement analysis. The bias was expressed as the mean difference between the 2 methods, and the limits of agreement as 2 SDs of the difference of the 2 methods.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
The mean±SD of the testing 3D echocardiographic and reference EBCT measurements were 165.1±68.0 mL and 160.2±67.6 mL, respectively, for LVEDV and 70.4±47.9 mL and 63.5±54.0 mL for LVESV. A regression analysis and a Bland and Altman plot for LVEDV measurements are shown in Figures 1ADown and 1BDown, respectively. Linear regression indicated a high correlation (r=0.96; P<0.0001) between the reference and the testing methods, with a standard error of estimate of 21.34 mL. The limits-of-agreement analysis demonstrated a minimal mean difference (bias, -4.93±20.44 mL). The t test indicated no significant mean differences between the 2 methods. The results of LVESV regression and agreement analysis, which are shown in Figures 1CDown and 1DDown, also demonstrated high precision and accuracy (r=0.96; P<0.001; standard error of estimate, 14.78 mL; bias, -6.97±16.22 mL) and no significant mean differences between the 2 methods. Systolic volumes were not distributed as proportionally along the correlation line as the diastolic volumes, and the results were influenced by a large LVESV in one patient with ischemic heart disease.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Linear regression analysis for comparison of LVEDV estimated by 3D echocardiography (3D echo) and those estimated by EBCT, with the correlation and identity lines depicted as solid and dashed lines, respectively. Dotted lines delimit the 95% confidence band. B, Limits of agreement analysis. Difference of LVEDV between EBCT and 3D echocardiography is plotted against average values of the 2 methods. Solid line indicates mean; dashed line, zero line; and dotted lines, 2-SD limits. C, Linear regression analysis for comparison of LVESV estimated by 3D echocardiography and those estimated by EBCT. D, Limits of agreement analysis. Difference of LVEDV between EBCT and 3D echocardiography is plotted against average values of the 2 methods.

The linear regression and agreement plots of corresponding LVEDV and LVESV values estimated from the 3D echocardiographic data by 2 independent observers are shown in Figure 2Down. These results showed excellent correlation and only a small bias. In the estimation of the LVEDV and LVESV values, interobserver variability was 6.11% and 9.14%, respectively.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Linear regression analysis for comparison of LVEDV estimated by 2 independent observers. B, Limits of agreement analysis of the 2 LVEDV observer estimates. C, Linear regression analysis for comparison of LVESV estimated by 2 independent observers. D, Limits of agreement analysis of LVESV estimates from the 2 observers. Solid, dashed, and dotted lines as in Figure 1Up.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
We report a new rapid (6-s) 3D echocardiographic image acquisition method that uses a prototype handheld transducer with an internally rotating crystal array. This approach represents a practical solution to a clinically feasible acquisition of 3D data and provides precise and accurate diastolic and systolic volumes for a functional assessment of the left ventricle. In the present implementation, diastolic and systolic frames, which are required for 3D reconstruction of volumetric data, are selected a posteriori during off-line processing, although on-line processing is conceivable.

Advantages of Rapid 3D Echocardiography
The technique allows the rapid collection of data during 6 s of suspended respiration, which makes the technique feasible in most clinical scenarios. The prototype transducer is capable of all current Doppler and harmonic imaging modalities. Rotational geometry has been applied successfully to 3D reconstruction,8 9 10 and the approach discussed herein represents a practical extension of these efforts. An important characteristic of this geometry is that the images are equispaced and particularly useful for reconstructing the whole left ventricle. In addition, this system could sample sufficient 4D data for a dynamic analysis of LV function and shape.

Limitations
The manual delineation and off-line data processing were time-consuming; however, this was not an issue from the viewpoint of our experimental objectives and did not prolong the time needed to examine a patient. The present implementation of the method is limited to patients with a heart rate >=60 beats/min to collect a minimum of 6 tomograms. Multiplane transducers equipped with an adjustable rate of rotation would overcome this limitation.

The 5-MHz frequency of the transducer was not optimal for adult echocardiography but was dictated by the initial prototype design using transesophageal transducer mechanics. Consequently, limited signal penetration led to the exclusion of 2 patient data sets from analysis. A production system would certainly use a rotating transducer with lower frequency for transthoracic clinical applications.


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Rapidly acquired 3D data sets of 6 to 11 sequential tomograms provide precise and accurate measurements of LV volumes and ejection fractions in humans. Because of the short duration of acquisition (6 s), the technique is clinically feasible, and it allows, if necessary, repeated collection of 3D data during the course of a clinical examination, further enhancing the results. Additional work must concentrate on rapid and automated data processing before this technique can be used widely.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by grant HL 52494 from the National Institutes of Health.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Marek Belohlavek, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Received March 16, 2001; revision received April 23, 2001; accepted April 30, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusions
*References
 

  1. Tanabe K, Belohlavek M, Jakrapanichakul D, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography: precision and accuracy of left ventricular volume measurement using rotational geometry with variable numbers of slice resolution. Echocardiography. 1998;15:575–580.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Takuma S, Swas DR, Fard A, et al. Real-time, 3-dimensional echocardiography acquires all standard 2-dimensional images from 2 volume sets: a clinical demonstration in 45 patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:1–6.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Canals R, Lamarque G, Chatain P. Volumetric ultrasound system for left ventricle motion imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1999;46:1527–1538.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1243–1270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gilja OH, Hausken T, Olafsson S, et al. In vitro evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography based on magnetic scanhead tracking. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1161–1167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. King DL, Harrison MR, King DL Jr, et al. Improved reproducibility of left atrial and left ventricular measurements by guided three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1238–1245.[Abstract]
  7. Papavassiliou D, Doelling NR, Bowman MK, et al. Initial experience with an internally rotating transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic probe and image acquisition on a conventional echocardiogram machine. Echocardiography. 1998;15:369–376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Belohlavek M, Foley DA, Gerber TC, et al. Three- and four-dimensional cardiovascular ultrasound imaging: a new era for echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68:221–240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Roelandt J, Salustri A, Mumm B, et al. Precordial three-dimensional echocardiography with a rotational imaging probe: methods and initial clinical experience. Echocardiography. 1995;12:243–252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Yao J, Cao Q-L, Pandian NG, et al. Multiplane transthoracic echocardiography: Image orientation, anatomic correlation, and clinical experience with a prototype phased array multiplane surface probe. Echocardiography. 1997;14:559–577.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
N.A. M. Estes III
Sudden Cardiac Arrest From Primary Electrical Diseases: Provoking Concealed Arrhythmogenic Syndromes
Circulation, October 11, 2005; 112(15): 2220 - 2221.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belohlavek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seward, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belohlavek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seward, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Imaging