Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:e117

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Padayatty, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schäfers, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Padayatty, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schäfers, K. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Secondary prevention

(Circulation. 2001;103:e117.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Vitamin C and Coronary Microcirculation

Sebastian J. Padayatty, MRCP, PhD; Mark Levine, MD

Molecular and Clinical Nutrition Section, Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1372, MarkL@intra.niddk.nih.gov

To the Editor:

In their study on the short-term effects of vitamin C on coronary microcirculation, Kaufmann et al1 used adenosine to increase myocardial blood flow, which was assessed by positron emission tomography. When compared with controls, smokers showed an attenuated response that was corrected by 3 g of vitamin C given intravenously over 10 minutes. The authors conclude that cigarette smoke causes oxidant damage that is reversed by vitamin C.

Unfortunately, the study conditions are not physiological, which is a consequence of the sigmoidal vitamin C dose-concentration relationship. When vitamin C is given orally, it is completely absorbed until the dose exceeds 200 mg.2 Consumption of 200 mg of vitamin C daily, which occurs in a typical Mediterranean diet, results in a plasma concentration of {approx}70 µmol/L. Many cells, such as neutrophils, actively transport vitamin C and saturate before plasma. Saturation of cells by 70 µmol/L corresponds to the maximal velocity of the main tissue vitamin C transporter, sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 2.3 4 Higher vitamin C doses do not increase long-term plasma vitamin C concentrations because of decreased absorption and increased renal excretion, which begin when plasma concentrations exceed 60 to 70 µmol/L. With an oral dose of 1.25 g, less than half the dose is absorbed, and all that is absorbed is excreted.2 In contrast, when vitamin C is given intravenously, the limiting absorptive mechanisms are bypassed, and much higher plasma concentrations are achieved. Thus, when 1.25 g of vitamin C is given intravenously over 5 minutes, a peak plasma concentration of 700 µmol/L is attained, which falls to 200 µmol/L in 2 hours.2 Almost the entire dose is excreted in the urine in 12 hours. We estimate that 3 g of vitamin C given intravenously, as was done in Kaufmann et al’s1 study, will result in a plasma concentration of {approx}1500 µmol/L, which will fall by perhaps a few hundred micromoles per liter during the course of the study.

These vitamin C concentrations, which are 10 to 20 times those that can be obtained by oral intake, are clearly unphysiological. The response of the tissues to such pharmacological concentrations5 may have little bearing on vitamin C actions at the more modest physiological concentrations. Although this study demonstrates the utility of using high-dose intravenous vitamin C to produce antioxidant effects in experimental situations, it does not show that vitamin C has such actions at physiological concentrations and, unfortunately, it cannot form the basis for using vitamin C in primary or secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. A healthy diet containing at least 5 servings of varied fruits and vegetables a day will supply all the vitamin C we need.

References

  1. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, di Terlizzi M, et al. Coronary heart disease in smokers: vitamin C restores coronary microcirculatory function. Circulation. 2000;102:1233–1238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Levine M, Conry-Cantilena C, Wang Y, et al. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: evidence for a recommended dietary allowance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:3704–3709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tsukaguchi H, Tokui T, Mackenzie B, et al. A family of mammalian Na+-dependent L-ascorbic acid transporters. Nature. 1999;399:70–75.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Daruwala R, Song J, Koh WS, et al. Cloning and functional characterization of the human sodium-dependent vitamin C transporters hSVCT1 and hSVCT2. FEBS Lett. 1999;460:480–484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Padayatty SJ, Levine M. Reevaluation of ascorbate in cancer treatment: emerging evidence, open minds and serendipity. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19:423–425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Response

Philipp Kaufmann, MD; Paolo G. Camici, MD, FESC, FACC, FRCP; Tomaso Gnecchi-Ruscone, MD; Marco di Terlizzi, MD

Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK

Thomas F. Luscher, MD, FESC, FACC, FRCP

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

Klaus P. Schäfers, MSc

Klinik und Poliklinik fur Nuklearmedizin, Universitat Muenster, Muenster, Germany

We appreciate Drs Padayatty and Levine’s interest in our article.R1 We share their concerns about the direct extrapolation of our experimental data into daily clinical practice. In fact, in the discussion section of the article, we stated that "our study design does not allow us to comment on the long-term effects of vitamin C." However, the aim of our study was to prove the hypothesis that the noxious effects of cigarette smoke on the function of the coronary microcirculation are due, at least in part, to oxidative stress. Because smokers have reduced plasma and tissue levels of vitamin C, we thought to provide a supplement of this natural antioxidant at a dose that has previously been shown to improve endothelial dysfunction in smokers.R2 Although we agree that the plasma concentration of vitamin C achieved after such a high intravenous dose is not physiological, it had no appreciable effect in nonsmokers. Therefore, we believe that the effect of vitamin C on flow reserve in smokers was indeed due to its scavenging and antioxidant properties and that, at least in our study population, the impairment of the coronary microcirculation in smokers was still reversible, as proven by the normalization of flow reserve observed after the intravenous administration of vitamin C.

Although we agree that higher vitamin C doses do not increase long-term plasma vitamin C concentrations in healthy volunteers because of decreased absorption and increased renal excretion, this does not necessarily apply to smokers, who have reduced plasma and tissue levels of this vitamin. This depletion is thought to be due to increased consumption as the result of greater oxidative stress and to dietary differences.R3 This questions, in daily practice, the value of theoretically valid recommendations such as "a healthy diet containing at least 5 servings of varied fruits." Therefore, we believe that only a study testing the potential effect of long-term supplementation of vitamin C on coronary flow reserve in smokers could properly address the concerns of Drs Padayatty and Levine.

References

  1. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, di Terlizzi M, et al. Coronary heart disease in smokers: vitamin C restores coronary microcirculatory function. Circulation. 2000;102:1233–1238.
  2. Solzbach U, Hornig B, Jeserich M, et al. Vitamin C improves endothelial dysfunction of epicardial coronary arteries in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 1997;96:1513–1519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kritchevsky SB, Shimakawa T, Tell GS, et al. Dietary antioxidants and carotid artery wall thickness: the ARIC study: atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Circulation. 1995;92:2141–2150.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Padayatty, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schäfers, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Padayatty, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schäfers, K. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Secondary prevention