(Circulation. 2001;103:2138.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Departments of Medicine (P.R.V., D.W.L., M.C.M., L.M.G., D.D.E., M.M., J.M.I.), Cardiovascular Research (C.E.M., C.M.C.), and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.F.S.), St Elizabeths Medical Center, Tufts Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Douglas W. Losordo, MD, or Jeffrey M. Isner, MD, St Elizabeths Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135. E-mail dlosordo@opal.tufts.edu or jisner{at}opal.tufts.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsA steerable, deflectable 8F catheter incorporating a 27-guage needle was advanced percutaneously to the left ventricular myocardium of 6 patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive phVEGF-2 (total dose, 200 µg), which was administered as 6 injections into ischemic myocardium (total, 6.0 mL), or placebo (mock procedure). Injections were guided by NOGA left ventricular electromechanical mapping. Patients initially randomized to placebo became eligible for phVEGF-2 GTx if they had no clinical improvement 90 days after their initial procedure. Catheter injections (n=36) caused no changes in heart rate or blood pressure. No sustained ventricular arrhythmias, ECG evidence of infarction, or ventricular perforations were observed. phVEGF-2transfected patients experienced reduced angina (before versus after GTx, 36.2±2.3 versus 3.5±1.2 episodes/week) and reduced nitroglycerin consumption (33.8±2.3 versus 4.1±1.5 tablets/week) for up to 360 days after GTx; reduced ischemia by electromechanical mapping (mean area of ischemia, 10.2±3.5 versus 2.8±1.6 cm2, P=0.04); and improved myocardial perfusion by SPECT-sestamibi scanning for up to 90 days after GTx when compared with images obtained after control procedure.
ConclusionsThis randomized trial of catheter-based phVEGF-2 myocardial GTx provides preliminary indications regarding the feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of percutaneous myocardial GTx to human left ventricular myocardium.
Key Words: gene therapy mapping catheters
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the use of a minithoracotomy seems to be generally well tolerated, even in patients with advanced myocardial ischemia, nevertheless, the procedure has some risk associated with the administration of general anesthesia and some morbidity associated with surgical manipulation (particularly in patients with previous bypass surgery), and it limits the feasibility of repeat administrations. From a clinical trial perspective, GTx performed via thoracotomy carries the additional disadvantage of making randomization against placebo more difficult.
Accordingly, this pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of catheter-based, percutaneous myocardial GTx of naked DNA encoding VEGF-2 administered via a novel needle-injection catheter versus a mock procedure.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NOGA LV Electromechanical Mapping
Subjects underwent nonfluoroscopic LV
electromechanical mapping (EMM) immediately before GTx to guide
injections of plasmid DNA to foci of ischemic
myocardium. The NOGA system
(Biosense-Webster) of catheter-based mapping and navigation has been
previously described in
detail.7 8 9
The editing of the raw data was performed by the
NOGA system computer, and postprocessing
analysis was performed by blinded observers.
Local functional analysis is based on linear local
shortening (LLS), a parameter that calculates the
fractional shortening of regional endocardial surfaces at end-systole
and correlates with wall motion. Unipolar (UpV) and bipolar endocardial
potentials recorded from the tip electrode, based on local
intracardiac signal amplitudes, are used to map myocardial viability.
The combination of these 2 data sets permits an assessment of
electromechanical function that can be used to identify foci of
myocardial ischemia. For example, for a given myocardial
segment of interest, an UpV
5 mV (thereby suggestive of viable
myocardium) and normal local shortening
12% (thereby
suggestive of normal contraction) would together imply normal
myocardium. In contrast, an UpV <5 mV and abnormal local
shortening <4% (signifying severe regional hypokinesis or akinesis)
would denote a site of LV infarction. Alternatively, an UpV
5 mV and
abnormal local shortening of 4% to 12% (indicating mild to moderate
impairment of contractility) would suggest an area of
ischemic, hibernating
myocardium.6 10 11
To quantify the area of ischemia, a 2D algorithm based on a standard reference frame was used to calculate both the area of ischemia and the total surface area in the 2D view depicting maximal ischemia.
Plasmid DNA
The phVEGF-2 plasmid containing the complementary DNA
sequence encoding the 52-kDa human VEGF-2 (Vascular Genetics, Inc) was
administered via the injection catheter. This expression plasmid is
5283-base pairs in length and was constructed by Human Genome Sciences.
Preparation and purification from cultures of phVEGF-2transformed
Escherichia coli were performed
by the Puresyn PolyFlo method and contained 1.22 mg/mL plasmid DNA in
phosphate-buffered saline (20 mmol/L, pH 7.2; containing 0.01%
[wt/vol] edetate disodium).
Percutaneous Catheter-Based
Myocardial GTx
After the completion of LV EMM, the mapping catheter
was replaced by the injection catheter (Biosense-Webster), a modified
8F mapping catheter, the distal tip of which incorporates a 27G needle
that can be advanced or retracted by 4 to 6 mm. The catheter was
flushed with sterile saline for 30 to 45 minutes before injections,
thus prefilling the lumen before the introduction of the catheter into
the circulation. The injection catheter was then advanced via a femoral
arteriotomy across the aortic valve into the left ventricle, and it was
manipulated to acquire stable points based on the
parameters described above within the target region that
had been superimposed on the previously acquired 3D map.
Once a stable point was attained, the needle was advanced 4 to 6 mm into the myocardium; the intracardiac electrogram detected transient myocardial injury and/or premature ventricular contractions as evidence of needle penetration into the myocardium. For patients randomized to GTx (1:1 randomization with placebo), 6 injections were made into areas of ischemia (suggested by the combination of preserved voltage and abnormal wall motion). Each injection consisted of 1 mL of solution (total volume, 6 mL/patient) delivered from a 1-mL syringe, for a total dose of 200 µg of phVEGF-2. After completion of each injection, the needle was retracted and the catheter was moved to another endocardial site within the zone of ischemia. After the last injection and before needle retraction, the lumen was again flushed with 0.1 mL of sterile saline.
Because percutaneous myocardial GTx had not been previously performed in human subjects, discussions with the US Food and Drug Administration and the Investigational Review Board of St Elizabeths Medical Center resulted in a procedural variation for patients randomized to placebo; in these patients, because no agent with the potential for benefit was to be administered, it was advised and agreed that the needle was not to be extended; the construction of this catheter does not permit injection of fluid if the needle is not extended. In every other respect, however, the procedure was reproduced, including advancing the catheter to 6 different areas and having the operators, as they located the appropriate ischemic sites, mimic the injection process, including instructions directed to the individual operating the work station and audible indications to the patient that an injection was "beginning" or "ending."
Patients initially randomized to the control group were prospectively designated as eligible for crossover to the GTx arm after 90 days if they failed to demonstrate evidence of clinical improvement and showed no improvement in myocardial perfusion by SPECT-sestamibi scanning or LV NOGA EMM. All patients were blinded throughout the procedure by judicious use of conscious sedation, taped music played through headphones, and the aforementioned attempts by the operator to mimic GTx in the control patients.
SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Study
In addition to LV EMM, subjects underwent a
Persantine SPECT-sestamibi study before and after GTx. The acquisition
of the post-stress SPECT image began 10 minutes after the end of the
stress period. Redistribution images were recorded before
and at least 4 hours after stress with the subject at rest.
Perfusion scores were calculated by a blinded observer for each patient
based on the Cedars-Sinai 20-segment short-axis
system.12 On day 90,
subjects underwent repeat nuclear perfusion testing using the same
stress protocol and isotope used at baseline.
Statistical Analysis
Data are reported as mean±SEM. Comparisons between
paired variables were performed using a Students
t test with a significance
level of
P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
LV Mapping Procedure
Areas of electrically viable myocardium
(UpV
5 mV) associated with abnormal/impaired wall motion (LLS
<12%), ie, electromechanical uncoupling diagnostic of
ischemia by the NOGA system, were
detected in all patients before GTx. Foci of ischemia involved
the anterior (n=2), lateral (n=2), posterolateral (n=1), and posterior
(n=1) LV walls.
Percutaneous LV GTx
Six patients underwent a total of 36
percutaneous catheter-based myocardial injections; this
included 3 patients who were initially randomized to phVEGF-2 GTx and 3
who crossed over to GTx >90 days after initial randomization to the
control group. Injections caused no significant changes in heart rate
(before injection,74±5 bpm; after injection, 74±5 bpm),
systolic blood pressure (147±14 versus 148±11 mm Hg),
or diastolic blood pressure (69±6 versus 70±5
mm Hg). Transient unifocal ventricular ectopic activity
was observed at the time the needle was extended into the
myocardium. In all patients, sporadic premature
ventricular contractions occurred during injection, but no
episodes of sustained ventricular (or atrial)
arrhythmias were observed. No sustained injury pattern was
observed during the injections as recorded by the endocardial
electrogram.
Continuous ECG monitoring for 24 hours after GTx disclosed no sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmias. ECGs recorded after GTx showed no evidence of acute myocardial infarction or ischemia in any patient. Creatine kinase-MB levels were not elevated above normal limits in any patient after GTx. There were no major complications, including no echocardiographic evidence of pericardial effusion and/or cardiac tamponade.
Clinical Outcome
Clinically, phVEGF-2transfected patients reported a
reduction in anginal episodes per week (36.2±2.3 versus 3.5±1.2
episodes/week, P=0.002) and the
weekly consumption of nitroglycerin tablets (33.8±2.3
versus 4.1±1.5, P=0.002) for
up to 360 days after GTx. In contrast, although blinded patients
randomized to the control group reported an initial reduction in weekly
anginal episodes and nitroglycerin consumption, this
changed clinical profile was not sustained past 30 days
(Figures 1A
and 1B
). Indeed, by 90 days after treatment
assignment, patients in the control group had regressed to values that
were not statistically different from baseline values.
|
Modified Bruce protocol exercise tolerance testing was performed in all patients at 90, 180, and 360 days after GTx. Of phVEGF-2transfected patients, 4 of 6 demonstrated improved exercise duration for up to 360 days after GTx; the increase in exercise duration ranged from 7 to 127 seconds (mean, 72±25 seconds). In the 2 patients in whom exercise duration was not improved, the test was terminated in one because of angina and in the other because of claudication. Of the 3 original control patients, 2 were not improved at 90 days after control assignment; after crossover to phVEGF-2 GTx, both were improved for up to 180 days after GTx. The one original control patient whose exercise test was improved 90 days after control assignment was permitted to crossover to GTx due to continued angina and persistent ischemia on SPECT-sestamibi scanning and LV NOGA EMM.
LVEF was not significantly altered for up to 360 days after GTx. For phVEGF-2transfected patients, mean LVEF before GTx was 44±9%; it was 49±7% after GTx (P=0.07). For control patients, mean LVEF before and after instrumentation was 43±4% and 47±7%, respectively (P=0.423).
NOGA Electromechanical Assessment
Mean UpV and bipolar voltage recordings
5 mV
and
2 mV, respectively, which defined myocardial viability in the
ischemic segments, did not change significantly after GTx. Mean
LLS in segments of myocardial ischemia, however, improved
significantly from 5.3±1.4% to 12.5±1.4%
(P=0.002) in patients
transfected with phVEGF-2
(Figure 2
). The area of ischemic
myocardium was consequently reduced from 10.2±3.5
cm2 before GTx to 2.8±1.6
cm2 after GTx
(P=0.04;
Figure 1C
) in these patients.
|
In contrast, patients in the control group demonstrated no
change in the area of ischemia at 90 days after control
assignment (9.9±6.7 versus 9.6±6.3 cm2
before versus after control), nor was the mean LLS significantly
different (ie, LLS remained in the ischemic range) after sham
procedures (6.7±2.4% and 8.1±3.2%, respectively, before and after
control; P=0.342). After
crossover to phVEGF-2, these patients demonstrated normalization of LLS
in ischemic segments (6.7±2.4% versus 12.9±1.7%,
P=0.04) and a reduction in
ischemic area (9.9±6.7 versus 2.2±0.4
cm2,
P=0.05) after 90 days compared
with baseline (Figure 3
).
|
SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Study
The results of EMM corresponded to improved
perfusion scores calculated from SPECT-sestamibi myocardial perfusion
scans recorded at rest (17.8±2.1 versus 11.5±2.6, before versus
after GTx; P=0.01) and in
pharmacological stress (22.3±3.0 versus 16.5±2.7;
P=0.03) in
phVEGF-2-transfected patients
(Figures 1D
and 4
). There was no change in either stress
(18.3±5.4 versus 18.0±3.5,
P=0.893) or rest (16.3±5.7
versus 15.0±4.0, P=0.659)
scores for patients in the control group before and after sham
procedures
(Figure 5
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Catheter-based techniques for myocardial GTx in human subjects have thus far been restricted to intracoronary infusion of viral vectors encoding for angiogenic growth factors14 and are thus potentially limited by imprecise localization of delivery of the viral vector and possible systemic exposure. Moreover, intravascular delivery of naked DNA is not feasible because of the fact that naked DNA is degraded by circulating nucleases; lacking receptor-mediated uptake mechanisms characteristic of viral vectors, naked DNA GTx leads to insignificant tissue uptake of systemically administered transgene.
In addition, reports of improved clinical outcomes with surgical-based transmyocardial laser revascularization procedures have not been associated with any consistent change in exercise tolerance or improvement in myocardial perfusion, as assessed by radionuclide imaging.15 16 17 Furthermore, studies involving catheter-based laser revascularization procedures have not reported a sustained clinical response. Recently published data on a nonrandomized study of direct myocardial laser revascularization18 reported a modest increase in exercise duration and reduction in angina class at 6 months, but it failed to show any significant change in perfusion.18
Preclinical studies were also performed specifically to test the feasibility and safety of catheter-based delivery of naked plasmid DNA encoding for VEGF-1.19 Gene expression was documented by transient increase in serum levels of VEGF-1 monitored by ELISA assay (an ELISA assay is currently available for VEGF-1 but not for VEGF-2). Effective GTx was demonstrated by the presence of plasmid DNA in myocardial tissue by polymerase chain reaction. No VEGF protein or plasmid was identified in remote organs. Injections caused no changes in heart rate, blood pressure, or O2 saturation. No sustained ventricular arrhythmias were observed. There was no ECG evidence of infarction. Objective evidence of reduced ischemia was documented in all VEGF-transfected animals. The mean area of ischemia decreased from 6.1cm2 at baseline to 0.6 cm2 after GTx in phVEGF-1 animals and from 6.7 to 1.2 cm2 in phVEGF-2transfected animals. No improvement was seen in the control animals. These findings therefore suggested that percutaneous myocardial injection of VEGF could be safely and reproducibly accomplished in the ischemic myocardium of swine and was associated with reduced evidence of ischemia by NOGA LV mapping.
The current pilot study was undertaken to determine if the encouraging experience with catheter-based myocardial GTx in animal models could be duplicated in patients, particularly with regard to safety. The absence of any adverse procedural outcomes, including ventricular arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, systemic embolization, or ventricular perforation, are encouraging in terms of the safety of the current device. These preliminary results were indeed judged sufficient to permit transition to a subsequent double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of catheter-based myocardial GTx of phVEGF-2; of the 19 patients thus far injected with phVEGF-2 or saline, there have again been no adverse procedural outcomes (unpublished data).
This preliminary experience thus suggests that it is feasible to replace currently employed operative approaches with minimally invasive techniques, whether using the catheter employed here or others under investigation, for applications of cardiovascular gene therapy designed to target myocardial function and perfusion. Such an approach may have at least 3 advantages compared with an operative approach. (1) It potentially allows more selective delivery of the transgene to targeted ischemic zones, including sites that are less accessible from a minithoracotomy. (2) The catheter-based approach, because it obviates the need for general anesthesia and operative dissection through adhesions related to the placement of previous bypass conduits, facilitates placebo-controlled, double-blind testing of myocardial GTx. (3) The intervention can be performed as an outpatient procedure and repeated if necessary.
Although the clinical findings of this pilot trial concerning efficacy are similarly encouraging, the number of patients and the single-blinded design preclude firm conclusions in this regard. Subsequent double-blind studies in larger patient cohorts will ultimately resolve this issue.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 5, 2000; revision received February 2, 2001; accepted February 8, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Tio RA, Tkebuchava T, Scheuermann TH, et al. Intramyocardial gene therapy with naked DNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor improves collateral flow to ischemic myocardium. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:29532960.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Baumgartner I,
Pieczek A, Manor O, et al. Constitutive expression of
phVEGF165 following intramuscular gene transfer
promotes collateral vessel development in patients with critical limb
ischemia. Circulation. 1998;97:11141123.
4. Isner JM, Baumgartner I, Rauh G, et al. Treatment of thromboangiitis obliterans (Buergers disease) by intramuscular gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor: preliminary clinical results. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:964975.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Symes JF, Losordo
DW, Vale PR, et al. Gene therapy with vascular
endothelial growth factor for inoperable
coronary artery disease: preliminary clinical results.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:830837.
6.
Vale PR, Losordo
DW, Milliken CE, et al. Left ventricular electromechanical
mapping to assess efficacy of phVEGF165 gene
transfer for therapeutic angiogenesis in chronic myocardial
ischemia. Circulation. 2000;102:965974.
7. Ben-Haim SA, Osadchy D, Schuster I, et al. Nonfluoroscopic, in vivo navigation and mapping technology. Nat Med. 1996;2:13931395.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Gepstein L, Hayam
G, Ben-Haim SA. A novel method for nonfluoroscopic catheter-based
electroanatomical mapping of the heart: in vitro and in vivo accuracy
results. Circulation. 1997;95:16111622.
9.
Vale PR, Losordo
DW, Tkebuchava T, et al. Catheter-based myocardial gene transfer
utilizing nonfluoroscopic electromechanical left
ventricular mapping. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:246254.
10.
Gepstein L,
Goldin A, Lessick J, et al. Electromechanical characterization of
chronic myocardial infarction in the canine coronary occlusion
model. Circulation. 1998;98:20552064.
11.
Kornowski
R, Hong MK, Gepstein L, et al. Preliminary animal and clinical
experiences using an electromechanical endocardial mapping procedure to
distinguish infarcted from healthy myocardium.
Circulation. 1998;98:11161124.
12. Germano G, Erel J, Lewin H, et al. Automatic quantitation of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening from gated technetium-99 m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:13601367.[Abstract]
13.
Kornowski R, Leon
MB, Fuchs S, et al. Electromagnetic guidance for catheter-based
transendocardial injection: a platform for intramyocardial angiogenesis
therapy. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2000;35:10311039.
14. Giordano FJ, Ping P, McKirnan D, et al. Intracoronary gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-5 increases blood flow and contractile function in an ischemic region of the heart. Nat Med. 1996;2:534539.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Frazier OH, March
RJ, Horvath KA, et al. Transmyocardial
revascularization with a carbon dioxide laser in
patients with end-stage coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med. 1999;341:10211028.
16.
Allen KB, Dowling
RD, Fudge TL, et al. Comparison of transmyocardial
revascularization with medical therapy in patients
with refractory angina. N Engl J
Med. 1999;341:10291036.
17.
Aaberge L,
Nordstrand K, Dragsund M, et al. Transmyocardial
revascularization with CO2 laser in patients with
refractory angina pectoris: clinical results from the Norwegian
randomized trial. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2000;35:11701177.
18.
Kornowski R, Baim
DS, Moses JW, et al. Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes
from direct myocardial laser revascularization
guided by Biosense left ventricular electromechanical
mapping. Circulation. 2000;102:11201125.
19. Vale PR, Milliken CE, Tkebuchava T, et al. Catheter-based gene transfer of VEGF utilizing electromechanical LV mapping accomplishes therapeutic angiogenesis: pre-clinical studies in swine. Circulation. 1999;100:I-512. Abstract.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Baldazzi, E. Jorgensen, R. S. Ripa, and J. Kastrup Release of biomarkers of myocardial damage after direct intramyocardial injection of genes and stem cells via the percutaneous transluminal route Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2008; 29(15): 1819 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Sinusas Targeted imaging offers advantages over physiological imaging for evaluation of angiogenic therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 511 - 514. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kinnaird, E. Stabile, S. Zbinden, M.-S. Burnett, and S. E. Epstein Cardiovascular risk factors impair native collateral development and may impair efficacy of therapeutic interventions Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Henry, C. L. Grines, M. W. Watkins, N. Dib, G. Barbeau, R. Moreadith, T. Andrasfay, and R. L. Engler Effects of Ad5FGF-4 in Patients With Angina: An Analysis of Pooled Data From the AGENT-3 and AGENT-4 Trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 11, 2007; 50(11): 1038 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Abbate, G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, P. Agostoni, M. J. Lipinski, and G. W. Vetrovec Recurrent angina after coronary revascularization: a clinical challenge Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2007; 28(9): 1057 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kupatt, R. Hinkel, M.-L. von Bruhl, T. Pohl, J. Horstkotte, P. Raake, C. El Aouni, E. Thein, S. Dimmeler, O. Feron, et al. Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Overexpression Provides a Functionally Relevant Angiogenic Switch in Hibernating Pig Myocardium J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1575 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ly, Y. Kawase, R. Yoneyama, and R. J. Hajjar Gene Therapy in the Treatment of Heart Failure Physiology, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 81 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yla-Herttuala, T. T. Rissanen, I. Vajanto, and J. Hartikainen Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors: Biology and Current Status of Clinical Applications in Cardiovascular Medicine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1015 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. J. Muller, H. A. Katus, and R. Bekeredjian Targeting the heart with gene therapy-optimized gene delivery methods Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2007; 73(3): 453 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. de Silva, L. F. Gutierrez, A. N. Raval, E. R. McVeigh, C. Ozturk, and R. J. Lederman X-Ray Fused With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (XFM) to Target Endomyocardial Injections: Validation in a Swine Model of Myocardial Infarction Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2342 - 2350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Nordlie, L. E. Wold, B. Z. Simkhovich, C. Sesti, and R. A. Kloner Molecular Aspects of Ischemic Heart Disease: Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Genetic Changes and Potential Applications of Gene and RNA Interference Therapy Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2006; 11(1): 17 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Bridges, K. Gopal, D. E. Holt, C. Yarnall, S. Cole, R. B. Anderson, X. Yin, A. Nelson, B. W. Kozyak, Z. Wang, et al. Efficient myocyte gene delivery with complete cardiac surgical isolation in situ J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1364 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gyongyosi, A. Khorsand, S. Zamini, W. Sperker, C. Strehblow, J. Kastrup, E. Jorgensen, B. Hesse, K. Tagil, H. E. Botker, et al. NOGA-Guided Analysis of Regional Myocardial Perfusion Abnormalities Treated With Intramyocardial Injections of Plasmid Encoding Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A-165 in Patients With Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: Subanalysis of the EUROINJECT-ONE Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Study Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-157 - I-165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kastrup, E. Jorgensen, A. Ruck, K. Tagil, D. Glogar, W. Ruzyllo, H. E. Botker, D. Dudek, V. Drvota, B. Hesse, et al. Direct intramyocardial plasmid vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 gene therapy in patients with stable severe angina pectoris: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study: The Euroinject One trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 982 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Y. Reddy, Z. J. Malchano, G. Holmvang, E. J. Schmidt, A. d'Avila, C. Houghtaling, R. C. Chan, and J. N. Ruskin Integration of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide left ventricular catheter manipulation: Feasibility in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 7, 2004; 44(11): 2202 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hoeben, B. Landuyt, M. S. Highley, H. Wildiers, A. T. Van Oosterom, and E. A. De Bruijn Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiogenesis Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2004; 56(4): 549 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kawamoto, T. Murayama, K. Kusano, M. Ii, T. Tkebuchava, S. Shintani, A. Iwakura, I. Johnson, P. von Samson, A. Hanley, et al. Synergistic Effect of Bone Marrow Mobilization and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-2 Gene Therapy in Myocardial Ischemia Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1398 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Raake, G. von Degenfeld, R. Hinkel, R. Vachenauer, T. Sandner, S. Beller, M. Andrees, C. Kupatt, G. Schuler, and P. Boekstegers Myocardial gene transfer by selective pressure-regulated retroinfusion of coronary veins: Comparison with surgical and percutaneous intramyocardial gene delivery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1124 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Tio, E. S. Tan, G. A.J. Jessurun, N. Veeger, P. L. Jager, R. H.J.A. Slart, R. M. de Jong, J. Pruim, G. A.P. Hospers, A. T.M. Willemsen, et al. PET for Evaluation of Differential Myocardial Perfusion Dynamics After VEGF Gene Therapy and Laser Therapy in End-Stage Coronary Artery Disease J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1437 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.G Melo, M Gnecchi, A.S Pachori, K Wang, and V.J Dzau Gene- and cell-based therapies for cardiovascular diseases: current status and future directions Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2004; 6(suppl_E): E24 - E35. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kondo, K. Ohmori, A. Oshita, H. Takeuchi, S. Fuke, K. Shinomiya, T. Noma, T. Namba, and M. Kohno Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer: The first demonstration of myocardial transfer of a "functional" gene using ultrasonic microbubble destruction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 644 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Chachques, F. Duarte, B. Cattadori, A. Shafy, N. Lila, G. Chatellier, J.-N. Fabiani, and A. F. Carpentier Angiogenic growth factors and/or cellular therapy for myocardial regeneration: A comparative study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2004; 128(2): 245 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Degabriele, U. Griesenbach, K. Sato, M. J. Post, J. Zhu, J. Williams, P. K. Jeffery, D. M. Geddes, and E. W. F. W. Alton Critical appraisal of the mouse model of myocardial infarction Exp Physiol, July 1, 2004; 89(4): 497 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Losordo and S. Dimmeler Therapeutic Angiogenesis and Vasculogenesis for Ischemic Disease: Part I: Angiogenic Cytokines Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2487 - 2491. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Melo, A. S. Pachori, D. Kong, M. Gnecchi, K. Wang, R. E. Pratt, and V. J. Dzau Molecular and Cell-Based Therapies for Protection, Rescue, and Repair of Ischemic Myocardium: Reasons for Cautious Optimism Circulation, May 25, 2004; 109(20): 2386 - 2393. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Askari, S. Unzek, C. K. Goldman, S. G. Ellis, J. D. Thomas, P. E. DiCorleto, E. J. Topol, and M. S. Penn Cellular, but not direct, adenoviral delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor results in improved left ventricular function and neovascularization in dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1908 - 1914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. MELO, A. S. PACHORI, D. KONG, M. GNECCHI, K. WANG, R. E. PRATT, and V. J. DZAU Gene and cell-based therapies for heart disease FASEB J, April 1, 2004; 18(6): 648 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rutanen, T. T. Rissanen, J. E. Markkanen, M. Gruchala, P. Silvennoinen, A. Kivela, A. Hedman, M. Hedman, T. Heikura, M.-R. Orden, et al. Adenoviral Catheter-Mediated Intramyocardial Gene Transfer Using the Mature Form of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D Induces Transmural Angiogenesis in Porcine Heart Circulation, March 2, 2004; 109(8): 1029 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pels, C. Deiner, S. E Coupland, M. Noutsias, A. P Sutter, H.-P. Schultheiss, S. Yla-Herttuala, and P. L Schwimmbeck Effect of adventitial VEGF165 gene transfer on vascular thickening after coronary artery balloon injury Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2003; 60(3): 664 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chu, C. C. Sullivan, M. D. Weitzman, L. Du, P. L. Wolf, S. W. Jamieson, and P. A. Thistlethwaite Direct comparison of efficiency and stability of gene transfer into the mammalian heart using adeno-associated virus versus adenovirus vectors J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 671 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zakine, E. Martinod, P. Fornes, M. Sapoval, D. Barritault, A. F. Carpentier, and J. C. Chachques Growth factors improve latissimus dorsi muscle vascularization and trophicity after cardiomyoplasty Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 549 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Friehs and P. J. del Nido Increased susceptibility of hypertrophied hearts to ischemic injury Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S678 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Sellke and M. Ruel Vascular growth factors and angiogenesis in cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruel, R. A. Kelly, and F. W. Sellke Therapeutic Angiogenesis, Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization, and Cell Therapy Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 715 - 750. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. D. Cox, C. A. Thompson, and S. N. Oesterle Biointerventional cardiovascular therapy Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2002; 23(22): 1753 - 1756. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. L. DeJongste, R. W. M. Hautvast, and R. A. Tio Therapeutic options for patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1541 - 1541. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Kim, A. S. Kini, and S. K. Sharma Therapeutic options for patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris: Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1541 - 1542. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kornowski Left ventricular electromechanical mapping for determination of myocardial function and viability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1075 - 1078. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Meerkin, M. Pellerin, H. T. Aretz, P. Paiement, S. L. Houser, and R. Bonan Transmyocardial coil implants: a novel approach to transmyocardial revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 488 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A Thompson and S. N Oesterle Biointerventional cardiology: the future interface of interventional cardiovascular medicine and bioengineering Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2002; 7(2): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Menasche and M Desnos Cardiac reparation: fixing the heart with cells, new vessels and genes Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2002; 4(suppl_D): D73 - D81. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines, M. W. Watkins, G. Helmer, W. Penny, J. Brinker, J. D. Marmur, A. West, J. J. Rade, P. Marrott, H. K. Hammond, et al. Angiogenic Gene Therapy (AGENT) Trial in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris Circulation, March 19, 2002; 105(11): 1291 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Chachques and A. Carpentier Reply J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 583 - 584. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yang, A. K. Ogasawara, T. F. Zioncheck, Z. Ren, G.-W. He, G. G. DeGuzman, N. Pelletier, B.-Q. Shen, S. Bunting, and H. Jin Exaggerated Hypotensive Effect of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 815 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Freedman and J. M. Isner Therapeutic Angiogenesis for Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, January 1, 2002; 136(1): 54 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Hagege, J.-T. Vilquin, P. Bruneval, and P. Menasche Regeneration of the Myocardium: A New Role in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease? Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1413 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Roethy, E. Fiehn, K. Suehiro, A. Gu, G. H. Yi, J. Shimizu, J. Wang, G. Zhang, J. Ranieri, R. Akella, et al. A Growth Factor Mixture That Significantly Enhances Angiogenesis in Vivo J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2001; 299(2): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Isner, P. R. Vale, J. F. Symes, and D. W. Losordo Assessment of Risks Associated With Cardiovascular Gene Therapy in Human Subjects Circ. Res., August 31, 2001; 89(5): 389 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Catheter-Based Myocardial Gene Transfer Journal Watch Cardiology, July 6, 2001; 2001(706): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. FRANCIS, M. K. RAIZADA, A. A. MANGI, L. G. MELO, V. J. DZAU, P. R. VALE, J. M. ISNER, D. W. LOSORDO, J. CHAO, M. J. KATOVICH, et al. Genetic targeting for cardiovascular therapeutics: are we near the summit or just beginning the climb? Physiol Genomics, December 21, 2001; 7(2): 79 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Losordo, P. R. Vale, R. C. Hendel, C. E. Milliken, F. D. Fortuin, N. Cummings, R. A. Schatz, T. Asahara, J. M. Isner, and R. E. Kuntz Phase 1/2 Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Dose-Escalating Trial of Myocardial Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor 2 Gene Transfer by Catheter Delivery in Patients With Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Circulation, April 30, 2002; 105(17): 2012 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |