| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:2042.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Cardiology (J.M.t.B., J.C.K., H.W.M.P.), St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein; the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (B.A.H.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; and the Department of Cardiology (F.W.A.V), University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to J.M. ten Berg, MD, Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. E-mail jurtenberg{at}wxs.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsA total of 530 patients, 34% of whom received a stent, were treated with aspirin plus coumarins. Half of the patients were randomized to angiographic follow-up. The target international normalized ratio (INR) was 2.1 to 4.8 during angioplasty and 6-month follow-up. Thrombotic events were death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and thrombotic stroke. Bleeding complications were hemorrhagic stroke, major extracranial bleeding, and false aneurysm. "Optimal" anticoagulation was defined as an INR in the target range for at least 70% of the follow-up time. There were 17 early thrombotic events (3.2%), 7 early bleeding episodes (1.3%), and 10 false aneurysms (1.9%). The incidence rate for both early thrombotic and bleeding events was lowest in patients in the target range. A total of 61 late thrombotic events occurred (11.6%). Optimal anticoagulation was an independent predictor of late thrombotic events (relative risk, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.57) and was associated with a 0.21 mm (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.42) larger vessel lumen at 6 months. Late bleeding episodes (1.4%) were lowest in patients in the target range.
ConclusionsCoumarins started before coronary angioplasty with a target INR of 2.1 to 4.8 led to the lowest procedural event rate, without an increase in bleeding episodes. During follow-up, optimal anticoagulation was associated with a decrease in the incidence of late events by 67% and a significant improvement in 6-month angiographic outcome.
Key Words: angioplasty coumarins thrombosis complications restenosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the prospective Balloon Angioplasty and Anticoagulation Study (BAAS), we were the first to study the effect of coumarins started before PTCA in addition to routine aspirin on early and late events.13 Coumarin therapy was started before PTCA to obtain an adequate level of anticoagulation during the procedure, and coumarins were continued for the 6 months after the procedure, in which restenosis takes place. This anticoagulation regimen reduced early and late (thrombotic) complications at the expense of a small increase in bleeding complications. In the present report, we studied the intensity and duration of anticoagulation as predictors of thrombotic and bleeding events. Furthermore, the relation between optimal anticoagulation and angiographic restenosis was evaluated.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Medication
Aspirin (loading dose, 300 mg; then 100 mg/d) and
coumarins (acenocoumarol or Sintrom at 6 mg on
the first day, 4 mg on the second, 2 mg on the third and thereafter
until intervention) were started 1 week before intervention. The
international normalized ratio (INR) was measured on the morning before
PTCA and daily thereafter until discharge. The target INR was
prespecified at 2.1 to 4.8 during the procedure and during follow-up.
However, it was not a prerequisite to perform PTCA. Heparin was
administered as a single bolus of 10 000 U immediately before the
procedure. After discharge, coumarins were continued for at least 6
months or until an event occurred, and dosing was done by one of the
regional Thrombosis Services. During the trial period, ticlopidine
became available in the Netherlands. Once it became available, it was
left to the discretion of the operator to start ticlopidine after
stenting (loading dose, 500 mg; then 250 mg twice daily for 4 weeks) or
to continue coumarins. There was a 1:1 randomization to angiographic
follow-up. Patients were followed for 12 months.
Definitions of Events and Angiographic
Outcome
Death comprised all deaths, regardless of the cause.
Myocardial infarction was defined
previously.13 ECG and
creatine kinase were evaluated before and immediately after PTCA and on
the day after PTCA. Reintervention was based on both restenosis
and evidence of ischemia. A stroke was based on imaging and on
neurological evaluation, and it was classified as ischemic or
hemorrhagic. In the absence of imaging, stroke was classified as
hemorrhagic. Major bleeding was defined as acute bleeding leading to
hospitalization and/or death, blood transfusion, or surgical
intervention. A false aneurysm was diagnosed by duplex
sonography. The primary angiographic end point was the minimal luminal
diameter (MLD) of each dilated segment at follow-up. Total occlusion
was imputed as MLD=0 mm.
Events were classified as early (day 0 to 14 after PTCA) or late (day 14 to 365). A safety committee reviewed adverse events at regular intervals.
Optimal Anticoagulation
"Optimal" anticoagulation was defined as an INR
in the target range for >70% of the follow-up
time.
Estimation of Time Spent in Different INR
Categories
For each patient, the time spent in 4 predefined INR
categories (<2.1, 2.1 to 4.8, >4.8, and missing) was estimated until
1 year after discharge or until an event occurred. The number of days
spent in these INR categories was estimated using the linear
interpolation method.14 This
method assumes that the INR value between 2 consecutive measurements
varies linearly. If the time between 2 consecutive measurements exceeds
28 days, the INR is considered not predictable for the middle part of
this interval.
Calculation of Early Event Rate
The thrombotic and bleeding events were allocated to
a particular INR category by the value of the last INR on the day of
the event. The incidence rates of both thrombotic and bleeding events
were calculated as the total number of events in a particular INR range
divided by the number of patient-years spent in that INR
range.14
Statistical Procedures and Calculation of Risk
Factors for Late Thrombotic Events and Angiographic Outcome
A univariate analysis was
performed for the association of optimal anticoagulation and the
occurrence of thrombotic events. Subsequently, a
multivariate logistic regression analysis was
used to control this association for preselected covariates, including
age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, unstable angina
before PTCA, ejection fraction <50%, left anterior descending lesion,
total occlusion, length of the lesion, and randomization to follow-up
angiography. The significance of a linear trend for the time spent in
the INR target range and the occurrence of late thrombotic events was
also determined.
The association of optimal anticoagulation and the MLD at follow-up was studied by univariate analysis using Students t test and by multivariate analysis using linear regression. Patients who were not randomized to follow-up angiography were excluded from this analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Early INR Values
The time spent in the 4 predefined INR categories
during the first 14 days after PTCA or until an event occurred are
depicted in
Table 2
. The patients spent 62.2% of the time in the
target range.
|
Early Thrombotic Events and INR-Specific
Incidence Rates
No adverse events occurred before PTCA, and coumarins
were not discontinued before intervention in any patient. No
significant differences at baseline were found between the groups of
patients in different INR categories. A total of 17 patients (3.2%)
suffered from an early thrombotic event. Most events were early
reinterventions and procedure-related myocardial infarctions, of which
one was fatal
(Table 3
). In one patient, an event occurred but the INR
value was erroneously not measured before the procedure. Thus, the
INR-specific incidence rates were calculated using 94% of the events.
The incidence rate was lowest in patients in the target range, with 73
events per 100 patient-years
(Figure 1
).
|
|
Early Bleeding Complications
In 6 patients, excess site bleeding occurred, and in
one patient, gastrointestinal bleeding occurred (1.3%). Ten patients
(1.9%) developed a false aneurysm
(Table 3
). All bleeding episodes occurred within 36 hours
from intervention, and none was fatal. The early complication rate was
lowest in patients in the target range, with 57 complications per 100
patient-years
(Figure 1
).
Late INR Values
During follow-up, the mean number of INR measurements
per patient was 13.4±4.7. In 42 patients, no INR values were available
during follow-up
(Table 4
). The percentage of time spent in the INR
categories during follow-up for the remaining 488 patients is depicted
in
Table 2
. The patients spent 82.1% of their follow-up time
in the target range.
|
Predictors of Late Thrombotic Events
There were no significant differences at baseline
between the patients with optimal anticoagulation and those with
"suboptimal" anticoagulation during follow-up. After day 14, a
total of 61 thrombotic events (11.6%) occurred, mostly target lesion
revascularizations. Three patients died suddenly
(Table 3
). In the 44 patients in whom no INR values were
available, 3 events occurred. Thus, the analysis was based on
95% of the events.
By univariate analysis, optimal anticoagulation was associated with a reduced event rate (relative risk [RR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.61), and unstable angina before PTCA was associated with an increased event rate (RR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.40).
By multivariate analysis, optimal anticoagulation was associated with a lower event rate (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.57), and this effect was present for both stented (RR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.40) and nonstented patients (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.69). Furthermore, there was a significant linear trend for optimal anticoagulation and events: for every 10% of the time spent in the target range, the risk was reduced by 21% (P=0.0001). Unstable angina was associated with an increased event rate (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.44).
Predictors of Angiographic Outcome
The patients with optimal anticoagulation had a more
favorable angiographic outcome than those with suboptimal
anticoagulation. The MLD at follow-up was significantly larger in these
patients (1.81±0.66 versus 1.57±0.72 mm;
P=0.01;
Figure 2
), the late loss was smaller (0.53±0.65 versus
0.73±0.65 mm; P=0.049),
the net gain was larger (0.79±0.69 versus 0.64±0.70 mm;
P=0.15), and the diameter
stenosis at follow-up was smaller (38±18% versus 45±22%;
P=0.02) when compared with
patients with suboptimal anticoagulation.
|
By univariate analysis, several factors
were associated with the MLD at follow-up
(Table 5
). Optimal anticoagulation led to a 0.24 mm
(95% CI, 0.04 to 0.44) larger MLD at 6 months.
|
By multivariate analysis, 3 factors
were independently associated with the MLD at follow-up
(Table 5
). Optimal anticoagulation led to a 0.21 mm
(95% CI, 0.05 to 0.38) larger MLD. This effect was present both in
stented (0.15 mm; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.45) and nonstented lesions
(0.22 mm; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.42 mm).
Late Acute Bleeding Complications
Two patients suffered a fatal hemorrhagic stroke
(0.4%). A 54-year-old man without concomitant disease who had INR
values in the target range developed a cerebellar hematoma on day 109
(INR 2.9) and was operated on but died on day 250. A 75-year-old woman
with hypertension and diabetes mellitus had INR values above the target
range for 2 days after PTCA but was discharged with INR values in the
target range. She was readmitted with the clinical signs of a stroke at
the referring hospital on day 17 and died immediately, having an INR of
7.0. One patient had a nonfatal hemorrhagic stroke (0.2%) and
recovered completely. This was a 71-year-old man without concomitant
disease who had INR values in the target range and who developed an
occipital hematoma on day 196, after having discontinued coumarins 41
days previously. Five patients (0.9%) suffered late major extracranial
bleeding. For one patient with major bleeding, the INR category could
not be calculated. The incidence rate for major bleeding episodes was
lowest in patient in the target range, with 2.4 complications per 100
patient-years. Below the target range, 10 bleeding complications per
100 patient-years occurred, and above the range, 13 bleeding
complications per 100 patient-years occurred.
Ticlopidine Use
Ticlopidine became available halfway through the study
period. Coumarin pretreatment showed a similar reduction of events in
the year before ticlopidine became available (1996) compared with the
year when ticlopidine was used (1997).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thrombosis plays an essential role in the development of abrupt vessel closure, and thrombin is a key factor in this process.15 16 17 18 19 This was unequivocally demonstrated in 2 clinical trials in which thrombin inactivation by r-hirudin and Hirulog led to a significant reduction of early complications.9 10 In the BAAS trial, coumarins were also shown to reduce thrombotic complications, especially when the INR was in the target range. This result confirms our hypothesis that coumarins should be started before intervention to avoid paradoxical early prothrombotic effects from suppression of proteins C and S before inhibiting factors II, VII, IX, and X.
Thrombosis may also play a role in the restenosis process.6 7 15 However, the use of antithrombotics such as r-hirudin or Hirulog has not been shown to reduce the restenosis rate.9 10 This lack of effect on restenosis may be due to the fact that hirudin is not an inhibitor of thrombin production. Therefore, soon after cessation of r-hirudin or Hirulog, thrombin activity is anticipated. Another reason may be the duration of anticoagulation. There is evidence in animal studies and in humans that after plaque rupture, activation of the coagulation mechanism persists for a very long time.16 17 Furthermore, some experimental data showed that longer anticoagulation leads to less restenosis.16 In the BAAS trial, coumarins reduced the late event rate after PTCA; this was primarily due to a reduction of target lesion reinterventions. In this study, the coumarins were not only started before the procedure to obtain adequate anticoagulation during PTCA, but the level of anticoagulation was also well controlled during the 3 to 6 months after the procedure when restenosis takes place.13 The multivariate analysis performed in the present study showed that if an adequate level of anticoagulation can be obtained for at least 70% of the follow-up time, angiographic restenosis is reduced. These results suggest that thrombosis indeed plays a role in the restenosis process.
Until now, few trials have studied the effect of oral anticoagulant therapy on late restenosis after PTCA in humans.18 19 20 Clinical restenosis was studied in 2 small studies in the early years of PTCA.18 19 It was concluded that oral anticoagulants were not more effective than aspirin as adjunctive treatment after PTCA, but there are essential shortcomings in these studies: Coumadin was started after PTCA and an acceptable level of anticoagulation was obtained in only a minority of the patients during follow-up. The other report was an angiographic follow-up study. Kastrati and colleagues20 studied the effect of antiplatelet therapy versus oral anticoagulants on restenosis in a total of 432 patients who were all stented. There was no difference in restenosis between the antiplatelet group and the oral anticoagulation group. However, again, the oral anticoagulation was only started after stenting, with overlapping heparin until a stable level of anticoagulation was reached.20 Our results suggest that stable anticoagulation with coumarins is more effective than unfractionated, intravenous heparin.
Finally, is there any evidence in the literature for an
optimal level of anticoagulation during and after PTCA? Our trial is
the only study that used coumarin pretreatment with an adequate level
of anticoagulation during and after the procedure. The target INR of
2.1 to 4.8 was reached in a high percentage of the patients and led to
the lowest incidence of thrombotic events without increasing the risk
of bleeding. Further evidence to support a higher level of
anticoagulation (INR >2.0) comes from trials that studied the effect
of oral anticoagulants that were started after myocardial infarction or
unstable angina. In these trials, an INR value >2.0 led to a reduction
of events, whereas lower levels of anticoagulation (INR
2.0)
did not show any
effect.21 22 23 24 25
The largest randomized trial of this issue, which studied 3400 hospital
survivors of myocardial infarction, calculated the optimal INR to be
between 3.0 and
4.0.21
Recently, clopidogrel has become standard therapy for patients after stenting due to its rapid onset of action and strong antithrombotic effect.26 The combination of clopidogrel and pretreatment with oral anticoagulant therapy might reduce procedure-related complications even further, but we do not think clopidogrel would reduce restenosis, because Kastrati et al20 showed no effect with the use of ticlopidine. In BAAS, patients were not randomized to undergo stenting or balloon angioplasty only, but stents were placed for bailout situations and suboptimal results. This policy of provisional stenting makes a further subdivision of the effect of coumarins and/or ticlopidine on stented and nonstented patients difficult because stents and ticlopidine were given for procedural and thrombotic complications, which makes the balloon and stent group dissimilar from the start of the follow-up.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 8, 2000; revision received January 29, 2001; accepted January 29, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Serruys PW, Luijten
HE, Beatt KJ, et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful
coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon: a quantitative
angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4
months. Circulation. 1988;77:361371.
3. Kohchi K, Takebayashi S, Block PC, et al. Arterial changes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: results at autopsy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:592599.[Abstract]
4. Vaitkus PT, Herrmann HC, Laskey WK. Management and immediate outcome of patients with intracoronary thrombus during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1992;124:18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. White CJ, Ramee SR, Collins TJ, et al. Coronary angioscopy of abrupt occlusion after angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:16811684.[Abstract]
6. Harker LA. Role of platelets and thrombosis in mechanisms of acute occlusion and restenosis after angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:20B28B.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Schwartz RS, Holmes DR, Topol EJ. The restenosis paradigm revisited: an alternative proposal for cellular mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:12841293.[Abstract]
8. den Heijer P, Foley DP, Escaned J, et al. Angioscopic versus angiographic detection of intimal dissection and intracoronary thrombus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:649654.[Abstract]
9.
Serruys PW, Herrman
JP, Simon R, et al. A comparison of hirudin with heparin in the
prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.
N Engl J Med. 1995;333:757763.
10.
Bittl JA, Strony
J, Brinker JA, et al. Treatment with bivalirudin (Hirulog) as compared
with heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable or
postinfarction angina. N Engl J
Med. 1995;333:764769.
11. Topol EJ, Califf M, Weisman HF, et al. Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. Lancet. 1994;343:881886.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
The ERASER
Investigators. Acute platelet inhibition with abciximab does not
reduce in-stent restenosis (ERASER study).
Circulation. 1999;100:799806.
13.
ten Berg JM,
Kelder JC, Suttorp MJ, et al. Effect of coumarins started before
coronary angioplasty on acute complications and long-term
follow-up: a randomized trial.
Circulation. 2000;102:386391.
14. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJM, et al. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69:236239.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Toschi V, Gallo
R, Lettino M, et al. Tissue factor modulates the thrombogenicity of
human atherosclerotic plaques.
Circulation. 1997;95:594599.
16.
Gallo R, Padurean
A, Toschi V, et al. Prolonged thrombin inhibition reduces
restenosis after balloon angioplasty in porcine
coronary arteries.
Circulation. 1998;97:581588.
17.
Merlini PA, Bauer
KA, Oltrona L, et al. Persistent activation of coagulation mechanism in
unstable angina and myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1994;90:6168.
18.
Thornton MA,
Gruentzig AR, Hollman J, et al. Coumadin and aspirin in prevention of
recurrence after transluminal coronary angioplasty: a
randomized study. Circulation. 1984;69:721727.
19.
Urban P, Buller
N, Fox K, et al. Lack of effect of warfarin on the restenosis
rate or on clinical outcome after balloon coronary angioplasty.
Br Heart J. 1988;60:485488.
20. Kastrati A, Schühlen H, Hausleiter J, et al. Restenosis after coronary stent placement and randomization to a 4-week combined antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Circulation. 1997;96:462467.
21. Azar AJ, Cannegieter SC, Deckers JW, et al. Optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:13491355.[Abstract]
22.
Anand SS, Yusuf
S, Poque J, et al. Long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in patients
with unstable angina or suspected nonQ-wave myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1998;98:10641070.
23. Williams MJA, Morison IM, Parker JH, et al. Progression of the culprit lesion in unstable coronary artery disease with warfarin and aspirin versus aspirin alone: preliminary study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:364369.[Abstract]
24.
Cohen M, Adams
PC, Perry G, et al. Combination antithrombotic therapy in unstable rest
angina and nonQ-wave infarction in nonprior aspirin users.
Circulation. 1994;89:8188.
25. Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS) Investigators. Randomised double-blind trial of fixed low-dose warfarin with aspirin after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1997;350:389396.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Bertrand ME,
Rupprecht H-J, Urban P, for the CLASSICS Investigators. Double-blind
study of the safety of clopidogrel with and without a loading dose in
combination with aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with
aspirin after coronary stenting: The Clopidogrel Aspirin Stent
International Cooperative Study (CLASSICS).
Circulation. 2000;102:624629.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Oake MSc, A. Jennings MA, A. J. Forster MD MSc, D. Fergusson PhD, S. Doucette MSc, and C. van Walraven MD MSc Anticoagulation intensity and outcomes among patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 29, 2008; 179(3): 235 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yano, T. Ohmori, S. Hoshide, S. Madoiwa, K. Yamamoto, T. Katsuki, T. Mitsuhashi, J. Mimuro, K. Shimada, K. Kario, et al. Determinants of thrombin generation, fibrinolytic activity, and endothelial dysfunction in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy: involvement of factors other than platelet aggregability in Virchow's triad Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2008; 29(14): 1729 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Rahel, F. L.J. Visseren, M.-J. Suttorp, T. H.W. Plokker, J. C. Kelder, B. M. de Jongh, K.P. Bouter, and R. J.A. Diepersloot Preprocedural serum levels of acute-phase reactants and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention Cardiovasc Res, October 15, 2003; 60(1): 136 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Ikeda, K. Shimada, J. M. ten Berg, J. C. Kelder, H.W. T. Plokker, B. A. Hutten, and F. W.A. Verheugt Oral Anticoagulation Therapy During and After Coronary Angioplasty Circulation, December 11, 2001; 104 (24): e150 - e150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Warfarin for PTCA Journal Watch Cardiology, July 6, 2001; 2001(706): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |