| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:1734.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Correspondence to Patrick H. McNulty, MD, Section of Cardiology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, MC H047, PO Box 850, Hershey PA 17033. E-mail pmcnulty{at}psu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe
used AV balance and intracoronary infusion techniques to compare the
intrinsic cardiac responsiveness to insulin in 26 coronary disease
patients with (n=13) and without (n=13) NIDDM. During fasting, NIDDM
hearts demonstrated lower fractional extraction of glucose from
arterial plasma than controls (1.0±0.5% versus 2.1±0.5%,
P<0.05) despite higher
circulating insulin levels (26±5 versus 13±4 µU · mL,
P<0.05). This was compensated
for by higher circulating glucose levels, so that net cardiac glucose
uptake in the 2 groups was equivalent (5.2±1.1 versus 5.3±1.1 µmol
· min). Intracoronary insulin infusion produced an
3-fold increase
in fractional extraction and net uptake of glucose across the heart in
both groups (to 3.7±0.4% and 18.3±3.5 µmol · min in NIDDM and to
5.4±0.7% and 17.7±4.3 µmol · min in controls) accompanied by an
30% increase in net lactate uptake, suggesting preserved insulin
action on both glucose uptake and glucose oxidation in the NIDDM heart.
In nondiabetics, insulin consistently increased coronary blood flow,
but this effect was absent in NIDDM.
ConclusionsIn contrast to their peripheral tissues and coronary vasculature, the myocardium of patients with NIDDM expresses a competent insulin-response system with respect to glucose metabolism. This suggests that insulin resistance is mediated at the level of individual organs and that different mechanisms are involved in muscle and vascular tissue.
Key Words: diabetes mellitus myocardium insulin arteries
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most previous attempts to address this question have used the technique of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET to indirectly estimate the myocardial glucose uptake response to systemic insulin administration. These studies have yielded mixed results.6 7 8 9 More important, systemic insulin administration stimulates myocardial glucose uptake mainly indirectly by suppressing lipolysis in adipocytes and lowering the plasma fatty acid concentration, which removes fatty acid inhibition of heart glucose uptake and oxidation.10 This does not allow direct assessment of the interaction of insulin with the insulin-response system of the heart itself. To circumvent these limitations, in the present study we combined local intracoronary insulin infusion with direct measurement of arterial-coronary sinus glucose balance to compare the intrinsic myocardial responsiveness to insulin in ischemic heart disease patients with and without NIDDM.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
48 hours before study.
|
Experimental Protocol
The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects
Committee of the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, and all subjects
gave written informed consent. After a 12- to 16-hour fast, sampling
catheters were placed in a femoral artery and the proximal coronary
sinus as previously
described,11 and subjects
received 5000 U IV heparin sodium to prevent vascular thrombosis. In 12
subjects (6 with NIDDM and 6 control subjects), a Baim model
thermodilution catheter (Electrocatheter Co) was placed in the coronary
sinus to allow measurement of blood
flow.11
Twenty minutes after heparin administration, quadruplicate paired samples of arterial and coronary venous blood were obtained at 3-minute intervals for measurement of glucose, lactate, free fatty acid (FFA), insulin, and hemoglobin concentrations; coronary sinus blood flow was measured in triplicate.
Next, a catheter (JL-4, Cordis Inc) was advanced into the left main coronary artery. Through this catheter, a 40-mU · mL solution of human insulin (Humulin, Eli Lilly) in saline was infused continuously into the left coronary at 0.25 mL · min (10 mU · min) for 70 minutes. This rate was chosen to raise coronary plasma insulin concentration from the fasting into the upper physiological range without significantly increasing systemic insulin concentration. Because blood flow in the left coronary artery averages >50 mL · min,11 experimental infusion at 0.25 mL · min would not be expected to artifactually change coronary flow or substrate concentrations. Measurements were repeated during the final 10 minutes of infusion. Coronary angiography and left ventriculography were then performed.
Analytical Methods
Plasma glucose and lactate concentrations were
measured with an automated glucose oxidase/lactate oxidase analyzer
(Statplus 2000, YSI Inc) calibrated to external standards and with a
between-measures variance of 1.0%. Plasma FFA concentration was
measured with a microfluorometric modification of the Dole
procedure.12 Plasma insulin
concentration was measured with a double-antibody radioimmunoassay kit
(New England Nuclear Corp).
Calculations
Arterial-coronary sinus balance (µmol · L) for
glucose, lactate, and FFA was calculated by subtracting their coronary
sinus concentration from their arterial plasma concentration. These
differences were then divided by arterial concentration and multiplied
by 100 to give a percent extraction from arterial plasma for each
substrate. For subjects in whom coronary sinus flow was measured,
myocardial net uptake (µmol · min) of glucose, lactate, and FFA was
calculated by multiplying the arterial-coronary sinus balance by
coronary sinus plasma flow (blood flowx[1-hematocrit]). Myocardial
oxygen consumption was determined by the Fick principle after
calculation of arterial and coronary venous blood oxygen content (mL
·
L).11
Data Analysis
Results from quadruplicate sets of plasma samples
were averaged to yield 1 value for each measured variable under basal
and insulin-infused conditions for each subject. All data are expressed
as mean±SD. Within each group, comparisons between the 2 sampling
times were made by paired t
tests. Comparisons between the 2 groups at each sampling time were made
by 2-tailed unpaired t tests. A
sample size of 11 patients per group provides 80% power to detect a
15% difference in glucose AV balance between NIDDM and control
subjects, assuming11 an SD
of 16 and 35 µmol · L for measurement of glucose and lactate AV
balances, respectively, and using a 5% two-tailed significance
level.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 major coronary artery (average number of
arteries involved: nondiabetic, 2.2±0.6; NIDDM, 2.0±0.5), but the
left anterior descending and circumflex branches of the left main
coronary were observed to be patent and to perfuse the major portion of
the left ventricular muscle in all.
Plasma Substrate and Insulin
Concentrations
In the basal state, NIDDM subjects had higher arterial
plasma concentrations of glucose (8.9±1.1 versus 5.3±0.7 µmol ·
mL, P<0.01) and insulin (26±5
versus 13±4 µU · mL,
P<0.05) and higher hemoglobin
AIc levels (8.0±1.2 versus 5.3±1.0%,
P<0.05) than nondiabetic
control subjects
(Table 1
). Plasma lactate levels were marginally higher in
NIDDM patients (0.8±0.3 versus 0.6±0.2 µmol · mL,
P=0.10), whereas FFA levels
were uniformly high in both groups (1.2±0.3 versus 1.3±0.3 µmol ·
mL, P=NS), consistent with the
fasting state and heparin administration. Intracoronary insulin
infusion succeeded in raising the coronary venous plasma insulin
concentration to slightly above the physiological range in both groups
(142±14 versus 156±20 µU · mL for control subjects versus NIDDM
patients, P=NS) without
substantially increasing the systemic arterial insulin level
(Figure 1
). Arterial plasma glucose, lactate, and FFA
concentrations were not affected by insulin infusion in either group
(Table 2
), confirming the lack of any systemic metabolic
insulin effect during intracoronary infusion.
|
|
Coronary Sinus Blood Flow and Myocardial Oxygen
Consumption
Intracoronary insulin infusion increased coronary sinus
blood flow in each of 6 nondiabetic subjects by an average of
20%
(from 53±7 to 62±9 mL · min,
P<0.001). This was accompanied
by a corresponding increase in coronary venous oxyhemoglobin saturation
(from 31±5% to 39±5%,
P<0.01) so that calculated
myocardial oxygen consumption did not change (6.8±1.3 to 7.0±1.6 mL
· min, P=NS). In contrast, 0
of the 6 NIDDM subjects demonstrated a significant change in either
coronary sinus flow (55±10 to 56±11 mL · min,
P=NS) or myocardial oxygen
consumption (6.6±1.8 to 6.2±1.9 mL · min,
P=NS) during insulin infusion
(Figure 2
).
|
Arterial-Coronary Sinus Balance, Percent
Extraction, and Net Uptake
Arterial-coronary sinus balance and fractional
myocardial extraction of glucose, lactate, and FFA for each group are
shown in
Figure 3
. For glucose, in the fasting state, its fractional
extraction from arterial plasma in nondiabetics was twice that of NIDDM
patients (2.1±0.5% versus 1.0±0.5%,
P<0.01). However, because
NIDDM patients had higher arterial plasma glucose concentrations, the
net arterial-coronary sinus balances of the 2 groups were equivalent
(109±16 versus 99±16 µmol · L,
P=NS). Intracoronary insulin
infusion increased glucose extraction and arterial-coronary sinus
balance
2.5-fold in control subjects (to 5.4±0.7% and 294±36
µmol · L, both P<0.001
versus basal) and
3.5-fold in NIDDM patients (to 3.7±0.6% and
337±48 µmol · L, both
P<0.001 versus
basal)
|
Basal lactate extraction was marginally higher in nondiabetic than in NIDDM patients (33±7% versus 25±7%, P=0.02), but because NIDDM patients had slightly higher arterial lactate concentrations, arterial-coronary sinus balances for the 2 groups were equivalent (208±32 versus 213±31 µmol · L, P=NS). During intracoronary insulin infusion, all subjects demonstrated an increase in fractional extraction and arterial-coronary sinus balance for lactate, with no significant difference in the response of control subjects (to 46±7% and 278±39 µmol · L) and NIDDM (to 35±5% and 283±34 µmol · L) patients.
Basal extraction and arterial-coronary sinus balance of FFA were high, consistent with the high arterial FFA levels of these subjects who were fasting and had received heparin, but they were not different between groups. Intracoronary insulin infusion had no effect on fractional extraction or arterial-coronary sinus balance of FFA in either NIDDM patients or control subjects.
Table 3
lists the corresponding values for net myocardial
substrate uptake for the 6 subjects in each group in whom myocardial
blood flow was measured. Consistent with the arterial-coronary sinus
balance data, intracoronary insulin infusion increased net myocardial
glucose uptake
3-fold and lactate uptake
40% in both control
subjects and NIDDM patients, and there were no differences in the
magnitude of insulin-stimulated glucose or lactate uptake between the
groups (P>0.20 for all
comparisons).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the fasting state, our NIDDM patients differed from nondiabetic control subjects in exhibiting hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. These traits are known to indicate resistance to the insulin stimulation of glucose uptake by skeletal muscles, the major target tissue for insulin action.13 Correspondingly, we observed that fasting heart glucose uptake in NIDDM patients was merely equivalent to that of control subjects despite higher fasting glucose and insulin levels. This suggests that both skeletal and cardiac muscles of NIDDM patients are insulin resistant during fasting relative to those of nondiabetic control subjects. Because transmembrane transport is generally considered to be rate limiting for muscle glucose consumption during fasting, this further implies a fasting impairment in myocardial glucose transport in NIDDM, as has been described for skeletal muscles.14
The observation that NIDDM subjects and control subjects nevertheless exhibited a quantitatively similar glucose-uptake response to local insulin administration can perhaps be explained in the context of our present understanding of muscle glucose metabolism. Insulin stimulates muscle glucose uptake primarily by effecting translocation of the GLUT4 transporter from an intracellular compartment to the sarcolemma.15 Although a variety of defects in intracellular glucose metabolism have been described in individuals or families with NIDDM,13 studies measuring the rate of muscle glucose-6-phosphate accumulation during insulin stimulation have established that the insulin resistance of NIDDM primarily involves an impairment in muscle glucose transport/phosphorylation.16 After its transmembrane transport, the major metabolic fate of glucose imported into both human heart17 and skeletal muscles18 is storage in the form of glycogen. Insulin stimulation of glycogen synthesis in skeletal muscle is also specifically impaired in NIDDM,19 and this impairment accounts quantitatively for almost all the reduction in net glucose consumption in NIDDM muscles.20 Because even healthy prediabetic offspring of NIDDM patients exhibit impaired insulin stimulation of skeletal muscle glucose transport21 and glycogen synthesis,22 it has been suggested that the disease involves genetically transmitted defects in muscle glucose transporter and glycogen synthase expression.13 How can this be reconciled with the present finding that in NIDDM patients exhibiting insulin resistance of peripheral tissues, cardiac muscle nevertheless appears to remain as insulin responsive as in nondiabetic subjects? The answer may lie in the markedly different contractile work histories of cardiac versus skeletal muscles. In limb muscles of insulin-resistant subjects, contractile exercise increases the capacity for both glucose transport23 and glycogen synthesis.24 In contrast, reducing cardiac workload downregulates myocardial GLUT4 expression25 and produces marked resistance to stimulation of glycogen synthesis by even supraphysiological doses of insulin.26 Thus, the preserved insulin response of the NIDDM heart, relative to other tissues of the body, may reflect the protective effect of repetitive, high-frequency contractile work on glucose transporter and glycogen synthase expression and function.
Obtaining a maximum energy yield from imported glucose requires glycolytic conversion to pyruvate and subsequent mitochondrial oxidation. Although we did not directly measure myocardial glucose oxidation in this study, the finding that local hyperinsulinemia increased net myocardial uptake of lactate and glucose would be consistent with stimulation of glucose carbon flux through pyruvate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting step for lactate and pyruvate entry into the citric acid cycle. Augmenting myocardial pyruvate dehydrogenase flux has been demonstrated to improve the functional recovery from ischemia in the isolated heart.27 The observation that insulin widened the arterial-coronary sinus lactate balance by an equivalent amount in control subjects and NIDDM patients suggests that the capacity for this important response may also be preserved in the NIDDM heart.
Although hyperinsulinemia in the midphysiological range (50
to 60 µU/mL) appears to be without effect on coronary blood flow in
humans,28 we previously
observed that raising the systemic insulin level to
200 µU/mL
increases it by
20%.11
The similar response to local hyperinsulinemia in the present study,
unaccompanied by any change in myocardial oxygen demand or consumption,
suggests a direct, local insulin action on coronary arterial tone. It
is well established that insulin exerts an endothelium-dependent,
nitric oxidemediated vasodilatory action in skeletal
muscle.29 In that tissue,
the magnitude of the effect tracks the magnitude of the effect of
insulin on tissue glucose uptake and thus is progressively blunted by
the development of insulin resistance and
NIDDM.30 Although fewer data
are available concerning the heart, a similar loss of vasodilator
response to intracoronary insulin infusion has been reported to
accompany the development of whole-body insulin resistance in
canines.31 On the basis of
observations in skeletal muscles, a number of explanations could be
considered for the impaired blood flow response observed in NIDDM
patients, including a primary defect in coronary endothelial function,
more extensive atherosclerosis, or simply their prevailing
hyperglycemia.32 The present
observations do not allow these to be distinguished and furthermore
involve only a small number of subjects. Nevertheless, they suggest
that at least in the heart, the insulin responsiveness of vascular
tissue and muscle may be mediated independently.
The study has several limitations. NIDDM patients were
studied at plasma glucose concentrations
70% higher than
nondiabetic control subjects. This might be predicted to increase the
absolute magnitude of their heart glucose uptake by mass action, even
in the face of diminished intrinsic insulin responsiveness.
Nevertheless, studies of the whole-body response to insulin in NIDDM
demonstrate that even hyperglycemic insulin infusion produces less than
one half the fractional increase in whole-body glucose uptake produced
by euglycemic infusion in nondiabetic
subjects.33 In the case of
tissues of the whole body, this difference is attributable to both a
rightward shift in the insulin dose-response curve and decreased
maximal insulin response.33
The present results demonstrating proportionally equal insulin
stimulation of myocardial glucose uptake in control subjects and NIDDM
patients suggest that these changes in insulin sensitivity and response
capacity are not demonstrable in the heart. Because the study design
required fasting and heparin administration, our observations were
necessarily made at relatively high circulating FFA levels, which would
tend to suppress absolute myocardial glucose
uptake.10 Further studies
are needed to determine whether the glucose-uptake response of the
NIDDM heart remains equivalent to that of the nondiabetic heart at
higher glucose utilization rates. Finally, although we did not directly
measure whole-body insulin sensitivity in these subjects, our previous
observations11 suggest that
even in the absence of NIDDM, ischemic heart disease patients exhibit
some degree of whole-body insulin resistance relative to age-matched
healthy subjects.28 Because
the study did not include control subjects without heart disease, we
cannot distinguish whether the myocardial insulin-response
characteristics of our NIDDM and nondiabetic groups would have been
equivalent to those of healthy subjects or instead simply impaired to
an equivalent degree.
In summary, in patients with ischemic heart disease, the development of NIDDM appears to impair the effects of insulin on coronary tone but not on myocardial glucose consumption. Ischemic heart disease patients both with and without NIDDM express equally responsive cardiac metabolic insulin-response systems, which should be equivalent targets for insulin-based metabolic therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 13, 2000; revision received December 7, 2000; accepted December 20, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. OConnor CM, Hathaway WR, Bates ER, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome in patients in whom congestive heart failure develops after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: development of a predictive model. Am Heart J. 1997;133:663673.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Miettinen H, Lehto S, Salomaa V, et al. Impact of diabetes on mortality after the first myocardial infarction: the FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study Group. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:6975.[Abstract]
4.
Depre C,
Vanoverschelde J-L, Taegtmeyer H. Glucose for the heart.
Circulation. 1999;99:578588.
5.
Sun D, Nguyen N,
Degrado TR, et al. Ischemia induces translocation of the
insulin-responsive glucose transporter GLUT 4 to the plasma membrane of
cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 1994;89:793798.
6.
Ohtake T, Yokoyama
I, Watanabe T, et al. Myocardial glucose metabolism in
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients evaluated by FDG-PET.
J Nucl Med. 1995;36:456463.
7. Utriainen T, Takala T, Luotolahti M, et al. Insulin resistance characterizes glucose uptake in skeletal muscle but not in the heart in NIDDM. Diabetalogia. 1998;41:555559.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Voipio-Pulkki L-M,
Nuutila P, Knuuti MJ, et al. Heart and skeletal muscle glucose disposal
in type 2 diabetic patients as determined by positron emission
tomography. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:20642067.
9. Paternostro G, Camici PG, Lammerstma AA, et al. Cardiac and skeletal muscle insulin resistance in patients with coronary heart disease: a study with positron emission tomography. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:20942099.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Randle PJ, Garland PB, Hales CN, et al. The glucose fatty acid cycle: its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1963;1:785789.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
McNulty PH,
Louard RJ, Deckelbaum LI, et al. Hyperinsulinemia inhibits myocardial
protein breakdown in patients with cardiovascular disease and insulin
resistance. Circulation. 1995;92:21512156.
12. Novak M. Colorimetric ultramicro method for the determination of free fatty acids. J Lipid Res. 1965;6:431433.[Abstract]
13. DeFronzo RA, Bonadonna R, Ferrannini E. Pathogenesis of NIDDM: a balanced overview. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:318366.[Abstract]
14. Kolterman OG, Gray RS, Griffin J, et al. Receptor and postreceptor defects contribute to the insulin resistance of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1981;68:957969.
15.
Slot JW, Geuze
HJ, Gigengack S, et al. Translocation of the glucose transporter GLUT4
in cardiac myocytes of the rat. Proc Natl
Acad Sci
U S A. 1991;88:78157819.
16. Rothman DL, Shulman RG, Shulman GI. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of muscle glucose-6-phosphate: evidence for reduced insulin-dependent muscle glucose transport or phosphorylation activity in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:10691075.
17. Wisneski JA, Gertz EW, Neese RA, et al. Metabolic fate of extracted glucose in normal human myocardium. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:18191827.
18. DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Jequier E, et al. The effect of insulin on the disposal of intravenous glucose: results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterization. Diabetes. 1981;30:10001007.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Thorburn AW, Gumbiner B, Bulacan F, et al. Multiple defects in muscle glycogen synthase activity contribute to reduced glycogen synthesis in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:489495.
20. Shulman GI, Rothman DL, Jue T, et al. Quantitation of muscle glycogen synthesis in normal subjects and subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:223228.[Abstract]
21.
Rothman DL,
Magnusson I, Cline G, et al. Decreased muscle glucose
transport/phosphorylation is an early defect in the pathogenesis of
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1995;92:983987.
22.
Price TB,
Perseghin G, Duleba A, et al. NMR studies of muscle glycogen synthesis
in insulin-resistant offspring of parents with non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus immediately after glycogen-depleting exercise.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1996;93:53295334.
23.
Hughes V,
Fiatarone M, Fielding R, et al. Exercise increases muscle GLUT4 level
and insulin action in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.
Am J Physiol. 1993;264:E855E862.
24.
Talmadge RJ,
Silverman H. Glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis in normal and
chronically active muscles. Am J
Physiol. 1993;264:E328E333.
25. Depre C, Shipley G, Chen W, et al. The unloaded heart in vivo replicates the fetal gene expression of cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med. 1998;4:12691275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
McNulty PH, Liu
WX, Luba MC, et al. Effect of non-working heterotopic transplantation
on rat heart glycogen metabolism. Am
J Physiol. 1995;268:E48E54.
27.
Lewandowski ED,
White LT. Pyruvate dehydrogenase influences postischemic heart
function. Circulation. 1995;91:20712079.
28.
Ferrannini E,
Santoro D, Bonadonna R, et al. Metabolic and hemodynamic effects of
insulin on human hearts. Am J
Physiol. 1993;264:E308E315.
29. Steinberg HO, Brechtel G, Johnson A, et al. Insulin-mediated skeletal muscle vasodilatation is nitric oxide dependent: a novel action of insulin to increase nitric oxide release. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:11721179.
30. Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, et al. Impaired insulin mediated skeletal muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 1992;41:10761083.[Abstract]
31.
Rocchini AP,
Wilson RF, Marker P, et al. Metabolic and hemodynamic effects of a
graded intracoronary insulin infusion in normal and fat anesthetized
dogs: a preliminary study.
Hypertension. 1996;27:354359.
32. Tesfamariam B, Brown ML, Cohen RA. Elevated glucose impairs endothelium-dependent relaxation by activating protein kinase C. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:16431648.
33. Revers RR, Fink R, Griffin J, et al. Influence of hyperglycemia on insulins in vivo effects in type II diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:664672.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Raher, H. B. Thibault, E. S. Buys, D. Kuruppu, N. Shimizu, A.-L. Brownell, S. L. Blake, J. Rieusset, M. Kaneki, G. Derumeaux, et al. A short duration of high-fat diet induces insulin resistance and predisposes to adverse left ventricular remodeling after pressure overload Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): H2495 - H2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Chess and W. C. Stanley Role of diet and fuel overabundance in the development and progression of heart failure Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2008; 79(2): 269 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Witteles and M. B. Fowler Insulin-Resistant Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Evidence, Mechanisms, and Treatment Options J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 93 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Liu Insulin at physiological concentrations increases microvascular perfusion in human myocardium Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1250 - E1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ashrafian, M. P. Frenneaux, and L. H. Opie Metabolic Mechanisms in Heart Failure Circulation, July 24, 2007; 116(4): 434 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. McNulty, M. A. Tulli, B. J. Robertson, V. Lendel, L. A. Harach, S. Scott, and J. P. Boehmer Effect of simulated postprandial hyperglycemia on coronary blood flow in cardiac transplant recipients Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H103 - H108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Hafstad, A. M. Khalid, O.-J. How, T. S. Larsen, and E. Aasum Glucose and insulin improve cardiac efficiency and postischemic functional recovery in perfused hearts from type 2 diabetic (db/db) mice Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2007; 292(5): E1288 - E1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sharma, I. C. Okere, M. K. Duda, D. J. Chess, K. M. O'Shea, and W. C. Stanley Potential impact of carbohydrate and fat intake on pathological left ventricular hypertrophy Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2007; 73(2): 257 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. An and B. Rodrigues Role of changes in cardiac metabolism in development of diabetic cardiomyopathy Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1489 - H1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. McNulty Metabolic responsiveness to insulin in the diabetic heart Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H1749 - H1751. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Hafstad, G. H. Solevag, D. L. Severson, T. S. Larsen, and E. Aasum Perfused hearts from Type 2 diabetic (db/db) mice show metabolic responsiveness to insulin Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H1763 - H1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lautamaki, K.E. J. Airaksinen, M. Seppanen, J. Toikka, M. Luotolahti, E. Ball, R. Borra, R. Harkonen, P. Iozzo, M. Stewart, et al. Rosiglitazone Improves Myocardial Glucose Uptake in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease: A 16-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Diabetes, September 1, 2005; 54(9): 2787 - 2794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Stanley, F. A. Recchia, and G. D. Lopaschuk Myocardial Substrate Metabolism in the Normal and Failing Heart Physiol Rev, July 1, 2005; 85(3): 1093 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. von Lewinski, S. Bruns, S. Walther, H. Kogler, and B. Pieske Insulin Causes [Ca2+]i-Dependent and [Ca2+]i-Independent Positive Inotropic Effects in Failing Human Myocardium Circulation, May 24, 2005; 111(20): 2588 - 2595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Carroll, A. N. Carley, J. R. B. Dyck, and D. L. Severson Metabolic effects of insulin on cardiomyocytes from control and diabetic db/db mouse hearts Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2005; 288(5): E900 - E906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-L. Yue, W. Bao, J.-L. Gu, J. Cui, L. Tao, X.-L. Ma, E. H. Ohlstein, and B. M. Jucker Rosiglitazone Treatment in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats Is Associated With Ameliorated Cardiac Insulin Resistance and Protection From Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Myocardial Injury Diabetes, February 1, 2005; 54(2): 554 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hu, D. Zhang, L. Swenson, G. Chakrabarti, E. D. Abel, and S. E. Litwin Minimally invasive aortic banding in mice: effects of altered cardiomyocyte insulin signaling during pressure overload Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 7, 2003; 285(3): H1261 - H1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Taegtmeyer Improving Energy Metabolism in the Postischemic Heart-The Story of GIK Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2003; 7(1): 67 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Doenst, W. Bothe, and F. Beyersdorf Therapy with insulin in cardiac surgery: controversies and possible solutions Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S721 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Taegtmeyer, P. McNulty, and M. E. Young Adaptation and Maladaptation of the Heart in Diabetes: Part I: General Concepts Circulation, April 9, 2002; 105(14): 1727 - 1733. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |