Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:1709-1714

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godsel, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Engman, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Godsel, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Engman, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious endocarditis
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies

(Circulation. 2001;103:1709.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Prevention of Autoimmune Myocarditis Through the Induction of Antigen-Specific Peripheral Immune Tolerance

Lisa M. Godsel, PhD; Kegiang Wang, MD; Beth A. Schodin, PhD; Juan S. Leon, BA; Stephen D. Miller, PhD; David M. Engman, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Pathology and Microbiology-Immunology and the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence to David M. Engman, Northwestern University Medical School, Department of Pathology, 303 E Chicago Ave, Ward 6-175, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail d-engman{at}nwu.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Autoimmunity to cardiac antigens, in particular cardiac myosin, has been observed in humans with myocarditis and in animals with experimental inflammatory heart disease. Current treatments for myocarditis are in many cases immunosuppressive and might lead to increased cardiac damage by reducing host defenses against infectious agents. Therefore, we sought to develop an antigen-specific approach to inhibit autoimmunity in mice with myosin-induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis.

Methods and Results—Syngeneic splenocytes, coupled with cardiac myosin by use of ethylene carbodiimide, were administered intravenously before disease induction, and the effects of this peripheral tolerization on myosin-induced myocarditis were assessed. This antigen-specific immunotherapy significantly reduced both the incidence and severity of myocarditis, with the prevention of myocyte necrosis, mononuclear cell infiltration, and fibrosis. Myosin-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity and antibody production were significantly reduced, demonstrating that peripheral tolerance affected both T- and B-cell responsiveness to the autoantigen.

Conclusions—These results suggest that the induction of antigen-specific peripheral immune tolerance may be an effective approach for the treatment of myocarditides with autoimmune involvement.


Key Words: myocarditis • myosin • lymphocytes


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Myocarditis is a primary inflammatory heart disease that is formally diagnosed by cardiac biopsy and observation of myocyte necrosis and degeneration, with adjacent mononuclear cell infiltration in the presence or absence of fibrosis.1 The most common causes of myocarditis in the United States are viral, most commonly coxsackievirus.2 Other infectious and noninfectious agents, such as bacteria, protozoans, fungi, drugs, heavy metals, and insect stings may also cause cardiac inflammation.1 3

Immunomodulatory therapies, particularly immunosuppressive treatments, have been used in clinical trials for the treatment of myocarditis.3 Although immunosuppressive treatments are often useful in downregulating the autoimmune damage in myocarditis, they may promote viral spread and myocardial cytolysis. In fact, clinical trials and experimental studies of murine models of viral myocarditis have revealed that steroids and other immunosuppressive treatments are not always beneficial and may actually increase disease severity and mortality.4 Cytokine inhibition with vesnarinone has been shown to downregulate proinflammatory cytokine production, which would be deleterious during acute viral myocarditis.5 Conversely, such treatments as interleukin-2 and interferon-{alpha} may be effective in clearing the viral agent but may promote the development of cardiac autoimmunity.3

Experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) has proved to be a highly useful animal model of inflammatory heart disease. Myocarditis is induced on immunization of susceptible strains of rats and mice with the cardiac myosin {alpha}-heavy chain.6 Interestingly, immune responses against cardiac antigens, cardiac myosin in particular, have been observed in human inflammatory heart disease,7 making myosin a relevant antigen for disease induction in the mouse model. EAM is histologically similar to human myocarditis, with myocyte swelling and necrosis accompanied by mononuclear cell infiltration and fibrosis. EAM is a T cell–mediated disease, requiring both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets,8 9 10 11 whereas B cells are not vital for antigen presentation in EAM and autoantibodies are not necessary for the progression of myocarditis.12

We wish to develop treatments to be used immediately on the suspicion of myocarditis without the necessity of determining the presence or absence of an infectious agent. Antigen-specific immunosuppression would allow for the inhibition of autoimmune damage without adversely affecting the beneficial immune response mounted against the infectious agent that initiated the damage. We and others have successfully used intravenous administration of syngeneic splenocytes covalently coupled to antigen with ethylene carbodiimide (ECDI) to prevent and, more importantly, to treat a number of autoimmune diseases in animal models, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, neuritis, uveitis, and thyroiditis,13 14 15 16 and initial application of this approach to humans has been successful.17 In this report, we demonstrate that coupled-cell tolerance is effective for prevention of myocarditis in this mouse model, suggesting the usefulness of antigen-specific immunotherapy in treating myocarditis.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Animals
Male A/J strain mice (n=142; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Me) were 6 to 8 weeks of age at initiation of the experiments. Mice were anesthetized by a single injection of 60 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital IP for each experimental manipulation. The use and care of mice were in accordance with the guidelines of the Center for Experimental Animal Research at Northwestern University.

Preparation of Myosin
Cardiac myosin heavy chains were purified according to the method of Shiverick et al.18 Protein concentration was determined by comparing dilutions of the purified myosin solution with known concentrations of purified rabbit myosin heavy chain standards (Sigma) by SDS-PAGE.19

Preparation of Myosin-Coupled Splenocytes
Splenocytes were purified from naïve mice and incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes in Tris-NH4Cl (0.017 mol/L Tris free base, 0.14 mol/L NH4Cl, pH 7.2) to lyse erythrocytes, followed by 2 washes in HBSS (Gibco/BRL). The splenocytes were then coupled with purified cardiac myosin with the cross-linking chemical ECDI (Calbiochem) in the following manner. The splenocytes were washed in saline (0.15 mol/L NaCl, pH 7.2), pelleted at 1500g for 10 minutes in a 50-mL conical tube, and resuspended at a final concentration of 5x108 cells/mL in cold saline containing 1 mg/mL purified cardiac myosin or 1 mg/mL BSA (Sigma). The coupling reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.5 mL of freshly prepared ECDI (150 mg/mL in saline) per mL of the cell suspension and incubated for 1 hour on ice with periodic gentle inversion. The cells were washed 3 times with HBSS and maintained at 4°C until injection into mice.

Induction of Peripheral Tolerance
Tolerance was induced by the intravenous injection of 7.5x107 coupled splenocytes in 0.5 mL HBSS. Seven days after injection, the mice then received the normal myosin immunization protocol described below.

Induction of Autoimmune Myocarditis
Mice were immunized subcutaneously in 3 sites on the dorsal flank in a 100-µL volume containing 300 µg of purified cardiac myosin diluted 1:1 in complete Freund’s adjuvant (Difco). Seven days later, the mice were boosted with another 300 µg myosin in the same manner.

Histological Evaluation of Disease
Hearts were excised, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Hearts were cut in a plane such that both atria and ventricles were present in each section. Four or more sections per heart were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson’s trichrome and examined by microscopy. Evaluation of the heart sections was performed blind. Disease severity was graded as follows: normal (0), no infiltrate; mild (1), <10% of the tissue section involved; moderate (2), 10% to 25% of the tissue section involved; and severe (3), >25% of the tissue section involved.

Measurement of Antigen-Specific Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity
Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses were quantified with an ear-swelling assay 21 days after immunization. Mice were anesthetized, and prechallenge ear thickness was measured with a Mitutoyo model 7326 engineer’s micrometer (Mitutoyo MTI Corp). Antigen (10 µg) in a 10-µL volume of DTH buffer (0.15 mol/L K2HPO4, 0.01 mol/L Na4P2O7, 0.3 mol/L KCl, pH 6.8) was then injected intradermally into the dorsal surface of the ear with a 100-µL Hamilton syringe fitted with a 30-gauge needle. Ear swelling, resulting from mononuclear cell infiltration, was then measured 24 hours later and expressed in units of 10-4 in.

Serological Analysis
A myosin-specific ELISA was developed to analyze the isotype specificities of myosin-specific antibodies. After each incubation, the plates were washed 5 times with 1x PBST (1x PBS, 0.05% Tween-20). Ninety-six–well plates were coated with 2.5 µg/mL purified myosin overnight at room temperature and then blocked for 2 hours with 5% normal goat serum, 2% BSA in PBST. Mouse sera were diluted at 1:1000 in the blocking agent and incubated on plates for 2 hours at room temperature. The biotin-conjugated, isotype-specific secondary antibodies (Caltag Laboratories) were added at a dilution of 1:15 000 and allowed to adsorb for 1 hour. Peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (KPL Laboratories) was incubated at a dilution of 1:4000 for 30 minutes, and the plates were developed with TMB developing solution (KPL Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each serum was analyzed separately, and the data were compiled for each group. Each plate contained the same myosin-positive (from a severely diseased EAM mouse) and -negative sera for normalization.

Statistical Analyses
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. The statistical significance of DTH, disease severity, and antibody isotypes was analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni analysis. The statistical significance of disease incidence was analyzed with Pearson’s {chi}2. Probability values of P<0.05 were considered significant in this study.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Induction of Myosin-Specific Tolerance in EAM
A/J mice, when immunized with syngeneic cardiac myosin, develop severe myocarditis 21 days after immunization. In the present study, this immunization protocol was coupled with a tolerogenic protocol in an attempt to inhibit the autoimmune response, thereby reducing cardiac inflammation (Figure 1Down). Mice received an intravenous injection of 7.5x107 naïve, syngeneic splenocytes that had been coupled with cardiac myosin or BSA (sham control) with the cross-linking agent ECDI (day -7). One week later, the mice were immunized subcutaneously with 300 µg cardiac myosin in complete Freund’s adjuvant (day 0), followed by a boost 7 days later with the same antigen (day 7). At day 21, the effect of the tolerization protocol on the development of myocarditis and on myosin-specific immunity was analyzed by a number of methods: cardiac histology, DTH, and myosin-specific antibody production.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Protocol for induction of myosin-specific peripheral tolerance in EAM. Naïve A/J strain mice were used as donors of syngeneic splenocytes. Splenocytes were incubated with purified myosin in presence of cross-linking chemical ECDI to facilitate coupling of myosin to surface of cells. Myosin-coupled splenocytes were suspended in a concentration of 75x106 cells/mL in HBSS, and 500 µL was injected into tail vein of each naïve recipient mouse. These tolerized mice were immunized 7 days later with purified myosin according to our standard immunization protocol. Mice were analyzed 20 and 21 days later with myosin-specific DTH and antibody isotype analysis and cardiac histology.

Myosin Tolerization Prevents the Development of Myosin-Induced Myocarditis
On day 21 postimmunization, hearts were excised for histological examination, and sections were examined after staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome (Figure 2Down). Myosin tolerization was highly effective at preventing both the incidence and severity of myocarditis (Figure 2Down and TableDown). Hearts from most of the myosin-tolerized mice (13 of 22) displayed no inflammatory cell infiltration or fibrosis (Figure 2ADown and 2EDown), comparable to heart tissue from PBS-immunized controls (Figure 2DDown and 2HDown). In 9 animals, tolerance was not complete, with 2 of 9 mice demonstrating severe myocarditis and 7 of 9 demonstrating mild inflammation (data not shown). This is in striking contrast to the hearts from sham-tolerized (Figure 2BDown and 2FDown) and nontolerized (Figure 2CDown and 2GDown) animals, which displayed massive mononuclear cell infiltration, myocyte swelling and necrosis, and fibrosis. All cardiac sections were scored for disease (scores ranged from 0, normal, to 3, most severe; see Methods for details), and the results are presented in the TableDown. The incidence of disease in the myosin-tolerized group was not significantly different from that of the PBS control group but was different from those of the sham (P<0.002) and nontolerized (P<0.003) groups. The myosin-tolerized mice (1.4/3.0) had a significantly reduced disease severity compared with sham (2.1/3.0, P<0.02) and nontolerized (2.2/3.0, P<0.002) mice, while not being significantly different from the PBS control group. Thus, myosin-specific tolerization was effective in decreasing disease incidence and severity in most of the mice that did develop disease.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Myosin tolerization prevents development of myosin-induced myocarditis. Hearts were excised at 21 days after myosin immunization, and cardiac tissue was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (A through D) and Masson’s trichrome stain (E through H). Hearts of myosin-tolerized mice were histologically normal (A and E), as were those of PBS control mice (D and H). In contrast, hearts of sham-tolerized (B and F) and nontolerized (C and G) animals displayed a significant amount of damage, with necrotic myocytes surrounded by massive mononuclear cell infiltrate and corresponding collagen deposition.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Myosin Tolerization Reduces the Incidence and Severity of Myocarditis in Myosin-Immunized Mice

Inhibition of Myocarditis Through Antigen-Specific Tolerance Is Due to the Inhibition of Myosin-Specific Cellular Immunity
We have hypothesized that this treatment induces antigen-specific T-cell anergy.20 21 Therefore, we analyzed T-cell immunity to the tolerizing antigen by measuring the myosin-specific DTH elicited in each treatment group (Figure 3Down). Myosin-specific DTH was significantly diminished in the myosin-tolerized animals compared with both the nontolerized (P<0.0005) and sham-tolerized (P<0.0005) groups. Responses were not significantly different between the myosin-tolerized and PBS control groups or between the sham-tolerized and nontolerized groups. These results indicate that T cells have been affected by the tolerization protocol in an antigen-specific manner and that the reduction in DTH, and disease, was not simply due to the introduction of ECDI-treated splenocytes in this model.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Inhibition of myocarditis through antigen-specific tolerance is associated with inhibition of myosin-specific cellular immunity. Myosin-specific DTH was measured by a standard ear swelling assay at day 21 after myosin immunization. Myosin-tolerized mice demonstrated significantly reduced DTH compared with mice from sham-tolerized (P<0.0005) and nontolerized (P<0.0005) groups. DTH responses from myosin-tolerized mice are not significantly different from those of PBS control group.

Antigen-Specific Tolerization Reduces Myosin-Specific Antibody Production in EAM
An isotype-specific ELISA was developed to determine the effect of myosin tolerization on myosin-specific antibody production. Myosin-tolerized mice produced very little myosin-specific antibody of any isotype (Figure 4ADown). Although the antibody levels were higher than those detected in PBS controls (Figure 4DDown), they were much lower than those present in the sham-tolerized (Figure 4BDown) and nontolerized (Figure 4CDown) groups. Myosin-specific total IgG and IgG1 were significantly lower in the myosin-tolerized mice than in the nontolerized (P<0.002 and 0.03, respectively) and sham-tolerized (P<0.0003 and 0.002, respectively) groups. None of the other antibody isotypes were significantly different in myosin-tolerized mice and control groups. Interestingly, the myosin-specific antibody isotypes produced by animals with myocarditis suggest that both Th1 (IgG2a)– and Th2 (IgG1)–type T-cell responses are present.22



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Antigen-specific tolerization reduces myosin-specific antibody production in EAM. Levels of myosin-specific IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgA, and IgM and total IgG antibodies were assessed in each individual mouse serum by a cardiac myosin-specific ELISA. Total IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and minimal IgG2b levels were analyzed in sham-tolerized (B) and nontolerized (C) animals. Myosin-tolerized mice produced very low levels of antibody on immunization with antigen (A), only slightly more than those produced by PBS controls (D). Levels of total IgG and IgG1 detected in sera of myosin-tolerized animals are significantly less than those in sera from nontolerized (P<0.002 and 0.03, respectively) and sham-tolerized (P<0.0003 and 0.002, respectively) groups. No other isotypes were significantly different between myosin-tolerized and nontolerized or sham-tolerized groups.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
A wide variety of experimental methods of immunosuppression have been used to treat myocarditis and other autoimmune diseases, including administration of neutralizing antibody directed against T cells and antigen-presenting cells, such as anti-CD4,8 10 anti-CD8,8 10 and anti–major histocompatibility complex class II.23 Neutralization of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}24 or trafficking molecules such as chemokines like macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha}25 have been used with some success. Although these are useful in downregulating damage due to autoimmunity, there may be adverse consequences in downregulating immune responses directed against an infectious agent.4 Conversely, treatments such as administration of recombinant interleukin-2 and interferon-{alpha} may aid in viral clearance but might promote autoimmune cardiac damage.3 All of these approaches suffer in part from a lack of specificity and do not overcome the challenges posed by infection-induced, organ-specific inflammatory diseases.

The goal of the present study was to inhibit only self-directed immune responses by restoring autoantigen-specific peripheral tolerance. Our tolerization protocol was highly successful in inhibiting cardiac inflammation induced by myosin immunization. Myofibrillar swelling and necrosis and reparative fibrosis were absent in the tolerized mice (Figure 2Up and TableUp). Coupled-cell tolerance has been shown to downregulate both cellular and humoral immune responses as measured by DTH and antibody production.26 In the Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus model of multiple sclerosis, however, tolerance results in immune deviation in which the antibody isotypes produced switch from IgG2a and IgG2b, reflecting a Th1-type T-cell response, to IgG1, corresponding to a Th2-type response.27 In the present study, myosin-specific DTH was significantly decreased upon tolerization (Figure 3Up), and anti-myosin total IgG and IgG1 antibodies were significantly decreased (Figure 4Up). We performed all antibody analyses at 21 days after immunization, but future studies will also address responses during the entire disease course and when tolerance treatment is administered after disease onset. Studies in intravenous and nasal tolerization have also reported a decrease in antibodies directed against the tolerizing antigen,28 29 which is believed to be due to inhibition of T-cell help in tolerized animals.30 31 Although autoreactive B cells are present, autoantibody is not detected unless T-cell tolerance is overcome, as is true in EAM and is hypothesized to occur in human myocarditis. Clearly, autoantibodies to a number of cardiac antigens, including myosin, have been detected in humans with myocarditis,7 and it is possible that a pathogen or other damage-inducing event, such as myocardial infarction, could cause the breakdown in T-cell tolerance to self-cardiac antigens.

Among the possible mechanisms underlying peripheral tolerization are (1) direct anergy/deletion of Th1 lymphocytes20 21 32 ; (2) immune deviation, in which activation of Th2 lymphocytes occurs instead of the normal Th1 inflammatory cell activation27 ; and (3) cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 regulation of T-cell function by modulation of the threshold of T-cell activation, in which the strength of the signal by antigen stimulus must be much greater on cells expressing more molecules of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 or nonresponsiveness is maintained (T.N. Eagar et al, unpublished data, 2000). Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to analyze myosin-specific T-cell responses in vitro, because myosin is toxic to the cells23 and/or may induce their apoptosis (L.M.G., unpublished data, 2000). Our results support the theory that the treatment results in the antigen-specific nonresponsiveness of T cells, specifically Th1 T cells, responsible for the strong myosin-specific DTH. Myosin-specific antibody responses were also suppressed by the treatment, suggesting that tolerization also inhibits T-cell help for myosin-specific B-cell responses.30 31

We chose the EAM model to evaluate the effectiveness of coupled-cell tolerance to treat myocarditis because it separates cardiac autoimmunity from the complicating immune responses directed against an infectious, disease-inducing agent. There are a number of murine models of myocarditis that can be used to study the efficacy of this tolerance protocol in the presence of an infectious agent. These models include protozoans, such as Trypanosoma cruzi, and viruses, such as coxsackieviruses and encephalomyocarditis virus.33 EAM and the infectious models are very similar in a number of ways, including the presence of myosin-specific autoantibodies, myocyte necrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltrate. It is interesting to note that strains of mice susceptible to coxsackievirus-induced myocarditis are also susceptible to cardiac myosin–induced myocarditis.2

In conclusion, antigen-specific peripheral tolerance induction provides a powerful tool for dissecting the mechanisms involved in cardiac autoimmunity. Although myosin-specific tolerization was used to prevent EAM in this report, it should be emphasized that tissue homogenates can be used as well.13 Thus, specific knowledge of the target proteins in an autoimmune response is not a prerequisite for administration of the therapy. It will be of interest to test the approach in other models of myocarditis, including Chagas disease and coxsackievirus myocarditis, and in cardiac allograft rejection. The results reported here indicate the usefulness of this method and the need to use its efficacy in infectious forms of myocarditis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Engman is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. We thank Dr A. Rademaker for his advice on statistical analysis. We thank the members of the Miller and Karpus laboratories for their advice and guidance in the experimental plan and data interpretation present in this article.

Received September 11, 2000; revision received October 13, 2000; accepted October 18, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Pisani B, Taylor DO, Mason JW. Inflammatory myocardial diseases and cardiomyopathies. Am J Med. 1997;102:459–469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Rose NR, Hill SL. Autoimmune myocarditis. Int J Cardiol. 1996;54:171–175.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Anandasabapathy S, Frishman WH. Innovative drug treatments for viral and autoimmune myocarditis. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;38:295–308.[Abstract]
  4. Maisch B, Herzum M, Hufnagel G, et al. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory treatment for myocarditis. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1996;11:310–324.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ishiyama S, Hiroe M, Nishikawa T, et al. Inhibitory effects of vesnarinone in the progression of myocardial damage in experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43:389–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Neu N, Rose NR, Beisel KW, et al. Cardiac myosin induces myocarditis in genetically predisposed mice. J Immunol. 1987;139:3630–3636.[Abstract]
  7. Caforio AL, Goldman JH, Haven AJ, et al. Circulating cardiac-specific autoantibodies as markers of autoimmunity in clinical and biopsy-proven myocarditis. The Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:270–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Smith SC, Allen PM. The role of T cells in myosin-induced autoimmune myocarditis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1993;68:100–106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Bachmaier K, Pummerer C, Shahinian A, et al. Induction of autoimmunity in the absence of CD28 costimulation. J Immunol. 1996;157:1752–1757.[Abstract]
  10. Neu N, Pummerer C, Rieker T, et al. T cells in cardiac myosin-induced myocarditis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1993;68:107–110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Penninger JM, Neu N, Timms E, et al. The induction of experimental autoimmune myocarditis in mice lacking CD4 or CD8 molecules. J Exp Med. 1993;178:1837–1842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Malkiel S, Factor S, Diamond B. Autoimmune myocarditis does not require B cells for antigen presentation. J Immunol. 1999;163:5265–5268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kennedy MK, Dal Canto MC, Trotter JL, et al. Specific immune regulation of chronic-relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in mice. J Immunol. 1988;141:2986–2993.[Abstract]
  14. Braley-Mullen H, Tompson JG, Sharp GC, et al. Suppression of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis in guinea pigs by pretreatment with thyroglobulin-coupled spleen cells. Cell Immunol. 1980;51:408–413.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gregorian SK, Clark L, Heber-Katz E, et al. Induction of peripheral tolerance with peptide-specific anergy in experimental autoimmune neuritis. Cell Immunol. 1993;150:298–310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Dua HS, Gregerson DS, Donoso LA. Inhibition of experimental autoimmune uveitis by retinal photoreceptor antigens coupled to spleen cells. Cell Immunol. 1992;139:292–305.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Vandenbark AA, Barnes D, Finn T, et al. Differential susceptibility of human Th 1 versus Th2 cells to induction of anergy and apoptosis by ECDI/antigen-coupled antigen-presenting cells. Int Immunol. 1999;12:57–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Shiverick KT, Thomas LL, Alpert NR. Purification of cardiac myosin: application to hypertrophied myocardium. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1975;393:124–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Jenkins MK, Mueller D, Schwartz RH, et al. Induction and maintenance of anergy in mature T cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991;292:167–176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Tan LJ, Vanderlugt CL, McRae BL, et al. Regulation of the effector stages of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis via neuroantigen-specific tolerance induction, III: a role for anergy/deletion. Autoimmunity. 1998;27:13–28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Stavnezer J. Antibody class switching. Adv Immunol. 1996;61:79–146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Smith SC, Allen PM. Myosin-induced acute myocarditis is a T cell-mediated disease. J Immunol. 1991;147:2141–2147.[Abstract]
  24. Smith SC, Allen PM. Neutralization of endogenous tumor necrosis factor ameliorates the severity of myosin-induced myocarditis. Circ Res. 1992;70:856–863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Karpus WJ, Lukacs NW, McRae BL, et al. An important role for the chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha in the pathogenesis of the T cell-mediated autoimmune disease, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 1995;155:5003–5010.[Abstract]
  26. Battisto JR, Bloom BR. Dual immunological unresponsiveness induced by cell membrane coupled hapten or antigen. Nature. 1966;212:156–157.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Peterson JD, Karpus WJ, Clatch RJ, et al. Split tolerance of Th1 and Th2 cells in tolerance to Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:46–55.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kaliyaperumal A, Michaels MA, Datta SK. Antigen-specific therapy of murine lupus nephritis using nucleosomal peptides: tolerance spreading impairs pathogenic function of autoimmune T and B cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:5775–5783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shi FD, Li H, Wang H, et al. Mechanisms of nasal tolerance induction in experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis: identification of regulatory cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:5757–5763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Schmidt KN, Cyster JG. Follicular exclusion and rapid elimination of hen egg lysozyme autoantigen-binding B cells are dependent on competitor B cells, but not on T cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:284–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lohnas GL, Roberts SF, Pilon A, et al. Epitope-specific antibody and suppression of autoantibody responses against a hybrid self protein. J Immunol. 1998;161:6518–6525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sun J, Dirden-Kramer B, Ito K, et al. Antigen-specific T cell activation and proliferation during oral tolerance induction. J Immunol. 1999;162:5868–5875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Huber SA. Autoimmunity in myocarditis: relevance of animal models. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1997;83:93–102. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Meagher, Q. Tang, B. T. Fife, H. Bour-Jordan, J. Wu, C. Pardoux, M. Bi, K. Melli, and J. A. Bluestone
Spontaneous Development of a Pancreatic Exocrine Disease in CD28-Deficient NOD Mice
J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 7793 - 7803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. R. Marty, S. Dirnhofer, N. Mauermann, S. Schweikert, S. Akira, L. Hunziker, J. M. Penninger, and U. Eriksson
MyD88 Signaling Controls Autoimmune Myocarditis Induction
Circulation, January 17, 2006; 113(2): 258 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Li, J. S. Heuser, S. D. Kosanke, M. Hemric, and M. W. Cunningham
Protection against Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis Is Mediated by Interleukin-10-Producing T Cells that Are Controlled by Dendritic Cells
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2005; 167(1): 5 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J. S. Leon, M. D. Daniels, K. M. Toriello, K. Wang, and D. M. Engman
A Cardiac Myosin-Specific Autoimmune Response Is Induced by Immunization with Trypanosoma cruzi Proteins
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2004; 72(6): 3410 - 3417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. S. Leon, K. Wang, and D. M. Engman
Myosin Autoimmunity Is Not Essential for Cardiac Inflammation in Acute Chagas' Disease
J. Immunol., October 15, 2003; 171(8): 4271 - 4277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. M. Godsel, J. S. Leon, K. Wang, J. L. Fornek, A. Molteni, and D. M. Engman
Captopril Prevents Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
J. Immunol., July 1, 2003; 171(1): 346 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
S. E. LIPSHULTZ, S. D. FISHER, W. W. LAI, and T. L. MILLER
Cardiovascular Monitoring and Therapy for HIV-Infected Patients
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2001; 946(1): 236 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J. S. Leon, L. M. Godsel, K. Wang, and D. M. Engman
Cardiac Myosin Autoimmunity in Acute Chagas' Heart Disease
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2001; 69(9): 5643 - 5649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godsel, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Engman, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Godsel, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Engman, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious endocarditis
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies