Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:1440-1445

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, C. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors

(Circulation. 2001;103:1440.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Lysophosphatidylcholine and Reactive Oxygen Species Mediate the Synergistic Effect of Mildly Oxidized LDL With Serotonin on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation

Takuya Watanabe, MD; Rajbabu Pakala, PhD; Shinji Koba, MD; Takashi Katagiri, MD; Claude R. Benedict, MD, DPhil

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center (T.W., R.P., C.R.B.), and Third Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (S.K., T.K.).

Correspondence to Claude R. Benedict, MD, DPhil, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin, MSB 6.039, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail c.benedic{at}heart.med.uth.tmc.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Mild oxidation of LDL enhances its atherogenic potential and induces a synergistic interaction with serotonin (5HT) on vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation. Because of its complex chemical nature, the mitogenic components of mildly oxidized LDL (moxLDL) remain unclear.

Methods and Results—We examined both the effects of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a donor of reactive oxygen species, as major components of moxLDL and their interactions with 5HT on VSMC proliferation. Growth-arrested VSMCs were incubated with different concentrations of moxLDL, LPC, H2O2, or LPC with H2O2 in the absence or presence of 5HT. DNA synthesis in VSMCs was examined by [3H]thymidine incorporation. MoxLDL, LPC, H2O2, and 5HT stimulated DNA synthesis in a dose-dependent manner. MoxLDL had a maximal stimulatory effect at a concentration of 5 µg/mL (211%), LPC at 15 µmol/L (156%), H2O2 at 5 µmol/L (179%), and 5HT at 50 µmol/L (205%). Added together, moxLDL (50 ng/mL) and 5HT (50 µmol/L) synergistically increased DNA synthesis (443%). Coincubation of LPC (1 µmol/L) with H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) and 5HT (5 µmol/L) resulted in a synergistic increase in DNA synthesis (439%), which was nearly equal to that of moxLDL with 5HT (443%). The combined effects of LPC, H2O2, and 5HT on DNA synthesis were completely reversed by the combined use of an antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine (400 µmol/L) or butylated hydroxytoluene (20 µmol/L), with a 5HT2 receptor antagonist, LY281067 (10 µg/mL).

Conclusions—Our results suggest that both LPC and reactive oxygen species may contribute to the mitogenic effect of moxLDL on VSMCs and its synergistic effect with 5HT.


Key Words: antioxidants • atherosclerosis • lipoproteins • muscle, smooth • platelet-derived factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and other vascular proliferative disorders, including restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty. Currently, restenosis of the coronary arteries and to a lesser extent the peripheral arteries after angioplasty is a major clinical problem.1 Hypothetical mechanisms for restenosis after balloon dilation include activation and release of platelet growth factors, intimal migration and proliferation of VSMCs induced by growth factors, and the multiple effects of modified LDL.1 Several lines of evidence suggest that oxidative modification of LDL enhances its atherogenicity and plays a key role in the development of atherosclerosis.2 It is also known that the oxidation of LDL ultimately leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the conversion of phosphatidylcholine (PC) to lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC).3 Recent evidence indicates that ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2 • -), and the hydroxy radical (HOO2 ), stimulate VSMC growth4 and that LPC possesses mitogenic and chemotactic properties for VSMCs.5 6 Serotonin (5HT), which is released from activated platelets, is a potent vasoactive substance and is associated with coronary artery events.7 Our previous study showed that 5HT is a mitogen for VSMCs, which may contribute to the progression of atherosclerotic lesion or neointimal proliferation after angioplasty.8 Furthermore, we have also demonstrated that 5HT exerts a synergistic interaction with mildly oxidized LDL (moxLDL) on VSMC proliferation.9 Because of its complex chemical nature, however, the mechanism by which moxLDL acts synergistically with 5HT in promoting VSMC proliferation is unclear.

In this study, we examined both the effects of LPC and H2O2, a donor of ROS, as major chemical components of moxLDL and their interactions with 5HT on VSMC proliferation. We tested the effect of defatted BSA and catalase on moxLDL-induced DNA synthesis to show that LPC and ROS are responsible for the mitogenic effect of moxLDL. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and/or LY281067, a 5HT2 receptor antagonist, on DNA synthesis induced by LPC, H2O2, and 5HT.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
LDL (human), LPC, PC, H2O2, 5HT, NAC, BHT, BSA, and catalase were purchased from Sigma. LY281067 was donated by Eli Lilly Laboratories. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), FBS, and PBS were purchased from Gibco BRL. [3H]Thymidine (specific activity 20 Ci/mol) was obtained from DuPont-NEN.

LDL Oxidation
Human LDL was oxidized with CuSO4 at a final concentration of 5 µmol/L at 37°C, and the thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances (TBARS) content was determined every 30 minutes by removing an aliquot as described previously.9 All the samples were tested for their electrophoretic mobility by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The point at which there is no change in the electrophoretic mobility but an increase in TBARS content was selected as moxLDL. The LDL was oxidized at 37°C for 30 hours before EDTA was added to obtain oxLDL. Lipoprotein concentrations are expressed as protein concentrations. Even at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, native LDL (nLDL) showed no development of TBARS, whereas moxLDL showed a slight increase in TBARS formation (2 to 4 nmol/mg protein), with no change in the electrophoretic mobility. In contrast, oxLDL showed a significant increase in TBARS formation (35 nmol/mg protein) and an increase in the electrophoretic mobility.

Cell Culture
VSMCs were isolated from the thoracic aortas of male New Zealand White rabbits (body weight {approx}3 kg, n=95) by the explant method and were cultured in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO2/95% air) at 37°C.8 9 After 3 to 4 weeks, the tissue blocks were removed and the migrated VSMCs were cultured, followed by a subculture with trypsinization.

DNA Synthesis
DNA synthesis was examined by measurement of [3H]thymidine incorporation into the cellular DNA.8 9 VSMCs in passage 1 or 2 were seeded in 35-mm-diameter tissue culture plates and grown to semiconfluence in DMEM containing 10% FBS. Then, the medium was replaced with 2 mL DMEM containing 0.1% FBS and incubated for {approx}72 hours for growth arrest. After that, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 500 µg/mL BSA, 10 µg/mL insulin, 20 µg/mL transferrin, 25 ng/mL selenium, and 100 µmol/L pargyline (serum-free medium). After this, experiments were divided into 3 groups. In group 1, VSMCs were incubated with the indicated concentrations of nLDL, moxLDL, oxLDL, PC, LPC, H2O2, or LPC with H2O2. After 24 hours of incubation, indicated concentrations of 5HT were added, and the cells were incubated for another 24 hours. In group 2, VSMCs were incubated with different concentrations of LPC, H2O2, or LPC with H2O2 in the presence of NAC or BHT for 48 hours. In group 3, VSMCs were incubated with LPC, H2O2, or LPC with H2O2 in the presence of NAC or BHT. After 24 hours of incubation, 5HT was added, and the cells were incubated for another 24 hours. LY281067 was added 4 hours before the addition of 5HT. For all experiments, VSMCs were exposed to [3H]thymidine at a concentration of 1 µCi/plate for the last 5 hours of the 48-hour incubation period. [3H]Thymidine incorporation into VSMC DNA was quantified in a liquid scintillation counter. All the experiments were performed in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated a minimum of 3 times.

Cell Number
Growth-arrested VSMCs were incubated with indicated concentrations of LPC, H2O2, or LPC with H2O2 in serum-free medium. After 24 hours of incubation, 5HT was added, and the cells were incubated for another 24 hours.9 Cell number was measured with a Coulter counter. Counting was done in triplicate in each of the 5 plates, and each experiment was repeated at least 3 times.

Statistical Analysis
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. The data were compared by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test between 2 groups and by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test when >2 groups were involved. A value of P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of PC, LPC, and H2O2 on VSMC DNA Synthesis
The concentration-dependent effects of PC, LPC, and H2O2 on [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA are shown in Figure 1ADown and 1BDown. PC at concentrations tested did not have a significant effect on DNA synthesis. By contrast, LPC stimulated DNA synthesis in a dose-dependent manner between 0.5 and 15 µmol/L, with a maximal effect at 15 µmol/L (156±8%, P<0.0001 versus other concentrations of LPC). H2O2 also stimulated DNA synthesis in a dose-dependent manner between 0.1 and 5 µmol/L. Maximal stimulation was observed at 5 µmol/L (177±7%, P<0.0001 versus other concentrations of H2O2). When VSMCs were incubated with >5 µmol/L H2O2, there was a significant decrease in the [3H]thymidine incorporation, indicating that higher concentrations of H2O2 may be cytotoxic.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of LPC, PC, and H2O2 on VSMC DNA synthesis. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with given concentrations of LPC, PC (A), or H2O2 (B) for 48 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (A, 229±14 cpm; B, 232±16 cpm) =100%. *P<0.0001 vs other concentrations of LPC or H2O2 (ANOVA).

Effect of LPC or H2O2 With 5HT on VSMC DNA Synthesis
The interaction of LPC or H2O2 with 5HT on [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA is shown in Figure 2ADown and 2BDown. 5HT at 5 or 50 µmol/L induced DNA synthesis 1.8- or 2.1-fold higher than the control value, respectively (P<0.0001). When LPC at concentrations <15 µmol/L was added together with either concentration of 5HT, a synergistic rather than an additive effect was observed on DNA synthesis. The synergistic interaction between LPC and 5HT was prominent when nonmitogenic concentrations of LPC were incubated with either concentration of 5HT. For example, when VSMCs were incubated with 1 µmol/L LPC alone, LPC did not have any significant mitogenic effect. When VSMCs were incubated with 1 µmol/L LPC and 5 µmol/L 5HT, however, there was a significant increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation to 339±12% (P<0.0001), compared with 183±2% with 5 µmol/L 5HT alone. Like LPC, the synergistic interaction between H2O2 and 5HT was more significant when nonmitogenic concentrations of H2O2 were incubated with either concentration of 5HT. When VSMCs were incubated with 0.5 µmol/L H2O2 and 5 µmol/L 5HT, the amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation increased significantly to 304±13% (P<0.0001), compared with 182±3% with 5 µmol/L 5HT alone.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Interaction of LPC or H2O2 with 5HT in inducing VSMC DNA synthesis. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with given concentrations of LPC (A) or H2O2 (B) for 24 hours, followed by indicated concentrations of 5HT for 24 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (A, 238±12 cpm; B, 233±10 cpm) =100%. *P<0.0001 vs control; +P<0.0001, #P<0.05 vs 5HT (5 µmol/L); **P<0.0001, ++P<0.05, ##P<0.005 vs 5HT (50 µmol/L).

Effect of LPC and H2O2 With 5HT on VSMC DNA Synthesis
The interaction between subthreshold concentrations of LPC and H2O2 and 5 µmol/L 5HT on DNA synthesis is shown in Figure 3Down. When VSMCs were incubated with nonmitogenic concentrations of LPC (1 µmol/L) and H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L), there was a significant increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation to 262±8% (P<0.0001), suggesting a synergistic interaction between LPC and H2O2. When 5 µmol/L 5HT was added to this combination of LPC (1 µmol/L) and H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L), there was a further increase in the amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation (439±13%, P<0.0001). Similar synergistic interaction could be observed with all the concentrations tested. This stimulatory effect cannot be explained by simple additive effects of LPC, H2O2, and 5HT.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Interaction of LPC and H2O2 with 5HT in inducing VSMC DNA synthesis. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with given concentrations of LPC and H2O2 for 24 hours followed by 5HT for 24 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (243±11 cpm) =100%. *P<0.0001 vs control without 5HT; +P<0.0001 vs control with 5HT.

Interaction of LPC and H2O2 or Different Forms of LDL With 5HT on VSMC DNA Synthesis
The interaction of different forms of LDL or LPC and H2O2 with 5HT on DNA synthesis is shown in Figure 4Down. When tested alone for their effect on [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA, oxLDL, moxLDL (both 50 ng/mL), or LPC with H2O2 (1 and 0.5 µmol/L, respectively) significantly stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation (129±10% or 134±15%, both P<0.05; 262±8%, P<0.0001) compared with nLDL, PC, LPC, or H2O2. When the same experiment was repeated in the presence of 50 µmol/L 5HT, the amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation into the VSMCs increased significantly. Interestingly, the amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation into the VSMCs was nearly equal when VSMCs were stimulated with moxLDL and 5HT or with LPC, H2O2, and 5HT (443±12% versus 438±12%, P=NS).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Interaction of LPC and H2O2 or different forms of LDL with 5HT in inducing VSMC DNA synthesis. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with given concentrations of nLDL, moxLDL, oxLDL, PC, LPC, H2O2, or LPC+H2O2 for 24 hours followed by 5HT for 24 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (253±12 cpm) =100%. *P<0.05, +P<0.0001 vs control without 5HT; #P<0.05, **P<0.0001 vs control with 5HT.

Effect of LPC, H2O2, and 5HT on VSMC Number
To determine whether the induction of DNA synthesis by LPC, H2O2, and 5HT resulted in an increase in cell number, VSMC number was also examined (Figure 5Down). Because a significant synergistic interaction between LPC and H2O2 was observed at lower concentration of LPC and H2O2, we determined the cell number at 1 µmol/L LPC and/or 0.5 µmol/L H2O2. LPC and H2O2 were without any effect; however, in combinations with 5HT (5 µmol/L), the cell number increased (both P<0.05). When LPC (1 µmol/L) and H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) were added together, a significant increase in cell number was observed (P<0.01). In particular, coincubation of LPC (1 µmol/L) with H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) and 5HT (5 µmol/L) resulted in the greatest increase in cell number (P<0.01).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of LPC, H2O2, and 5HT on VSMC number. VSMCs ({approx}1x105) were plated in 2 mL serum-free medium. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with given concentrations of LPC, H2O2, or LPC+H2O2 for 24 hours followed by 5HT for 24 hours. Then cells were trypsinized and counted. Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=15). *P<0.01 vs control without 5HT; +P<0.05, #P<0.01 vs control with 5HT.

Effect of Antioxidants and LY281067 on VSMC DNA Synthesis
To find out whether antioxidants block the mitogenic effect of LPC and H2O2 and their synergistic interaction, VSMCs were preincubated with the antioxidant NAC (400 µmol/L) or BHT (20 µmol/L) along with LPC (1 µmol/L), H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L), or LPC (1 µmol/L) with H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L). When VSMCs were incubated with antioxidants, they completely blocked the mitogenic effects of LPC and H2O2 and their synergistic interaction (Figure 6Down). We evaluated the combined effects of the 5HT2 receptor antagonist LY281067 (10 µg/mL) and NAC or BHT on VSMC proliferation induced by LPC (1 µmol/L), H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L), or LPC (1 µmol/L) with H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) in combination with 5HT (5 µmol/L). When VSMCs were incubated with antioxidants and LPC and/or H2O2 with 5HT, antioxidants blocked the mitogenic effect of LPC and/or H2O2 and their synergistic interaction with 5HT without affecting the mitogenic effect of 5HT (Figure 7Down). Similarly, when VSMCs were incubated with LY281067 and LPC and/or H2O2 with 5HT, LY281067 blocked the mitogenic effect of 5HT and synergistic interaction with LPC and/or H2O2 without affecting the mitogenic effect of LPC and/or H2O2. When VSMCs were incubated with both antioxidants and LY281067 and then stimulated with LPC and/or H2O2 with 5HT, the mitogenic effects and the synergistic interaction of all the 3 mitogens were blocked.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of antioxidants on mitogenic interaction between LPC and H2O2. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with LPC (1 µmol/L) and/or H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) with NAC (400 µmol/L) or BHT (20 µmol/L) for 48 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (213±16 cpm) =100%. *P<0.05, +P<0.0001 vs control; #P<0.05, **P<0.0001 vs corresponding controls.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of antioxidants and/or LY281067 on mitogenic interaction among H2O2, LPC, and 5HT. Growth-arrested VSMCs were stimulated with LPC (1 µmol/L) and/or H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) in presence of NAC (400 µmol/L) or BHT (20 µmol/L). LY281067 (10 µg/mL) was added 4 hours before addition of 5HT. After 24 hours of incubation with LPC and/or H2O2, 5HT (5 µmol/L) was added and incubated for 24 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (234±15 cpm) =100%. *P<0.0001 vs control; +P<0.0001 vs LPC+5HT; #P<0.0001 vs H2O2+5HT; **P<0.0001 vs LPC+H2O2+5HT (unpaired t test); ++P<0.0001 vs all others in group of LPC+H2O2+5HT (ANOVA).

Effect of Defatted BSA and Catalase on MoxLDL- and 5HT-Induced VSMC DNA Synthesis
To ensure that LPC and H2O2 are the components responsible for the mitogenic effect of moxLDL and its synergistic interaction with 5HT, LPC, moxLDL, and oxLDL were pretreated with defatted BSA for 24 hours and then used in the experiments (Figure 8Down). Preincubation of LPC, moxLDL, and oxLDL with defatted BSA completely reversed the mitogenic effect of LPC and oxLDL and partially ({approx}70%) reversed the mitogenic effect of moxLDL on VSMCs and also resulted in a significant decrease in their interaction with 5HT in inducing DNA synthesis (365±14% to 260±8%, P<0.0001; 274±12% to 213±9%, P<0.001, respectively). When added to H2O2-, moxLDL-, or oxLDL-treated VSMCs, catalase (10 U/mL) completely blocked the mitogenic effect of H2O2 and partially ({approx}80%) that of moxLDL but did not have any significant effect on the mitogenic effect of oxLDL. Addition of catalase to moxLDL- and 5HT-treated VSMCs resulted in a significant decrease in the interaction of moxLDL with 5HT in inducing DNA synthesis (365±14% to 249±13%, P<0.0001).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effect of defatted BSA and catalase on moxLDL- and 5HT-induced VSMC proliferation. Growth-arrested VSMCs were incubated with untreated (control), defatted BSA (100 µg/mL)–pretreated or catalase (10 U/mL)–treated moxLDL or oxLDL (both 5 µg/mL, showing maximal effect), LPC (15 µmol/L), H2O2 (5 µmol/L), or 5HT (5 µmol/L) for 48 hours. When both moxLDL or oxLDL and 5HT were used, VSMCs were incubated with defatted BSA (100 µg/mL)–pretreated or catalase (10 U/mL)–treated moxLDL or oxLDL (both 50 ng/mL, showing maximal interaction with 5 µmol/L 5HT). At 24 hours after addition of moxLDL or oxLDL, 5HT (5 µmol/L) was added and incubated for 24 hours, and amount of [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA was measured. Data are shown as mean±SEM (n=10). Control value (240±11 cpm) =100%. *P<0.0001, +P<0.005, #P<0.001 vs control; **P<0.001, ++P<0.05, ##P<0.0001 vs corresponding controls.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
LDL oxidation is a progressive process leading to the formation of moxLDL and later to oxLDL. The increased atherogenic effect of moxLDL or oxLDL is attributed to the chemical changes brought about by the oxidation processes to the components of LDL, namely, generation of ROS and conversion of PC to LPC.3 9 During the early stages of oxidation, there is a significant accumulation of peroxides and presumably also other ROS, whereas the LPC levels are still relatively low. After 24 hours of oxidative stress, LDL contains large amounts of LPC but only small amounts of ROS.3 Thus, oxLDL may contain only LPC, whereas moxLDL may contain both LPC and ROS. This hypothesis is demonstrated by the facts that defatted BSA could deplete the mitogenic effects of both moxLDL and oxLDL and that catalase could reverse the mitogenic effect of moxLDL but not that of oxLDL. Recent studies have shown that a major source of ROS and H2O2 in vascular tissues is NAD(P)H oxidase,10 11 and the activity of NAD(P)H oxidase is increased by angiotensin II, thrombin, platelet-derived growth factor, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, and LPC.10 11 Thus, the source of ROS in the present study can be either moxLDL- or LPC-stimulated NAD(P)H oxidase.

Numerous studies have described the biological activity and atherogenicity of LPC and ROS. Consistent with previous observations,12 13 LPC and ROS were found to be toxic to cells at high concentrations, whereas lower concentrations induced DNA synthesis and cell growth. Similar effects have been observed with moxLDL, which over a narrow concentration range can cause both proliferative and cytotoxic effects.9 14 Several investigators have reported that G protein–mediated signal transduction is impaired by high levels of LPC.15 A low concentration of LPC has been shown to stimulate smooth muscle growth factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor,5 6 which may be responsible for VSMC migration and proliferation. Others have reported, however, that LPC itself is a mitogen for VSMCs under serum-free conditions.3 5 16

LPC and H2O2 induce extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 activation, c-fos and c-jun mRNA expression, and subsequent enhancement of activator protein-1–binding activity in VSMCs.4 6 17 18 It was recently reported that both LPC and H2O2 stimulate redox-sensitive c-jun N-terminal kinases and ERK5.17 19 Banes et al20 showed that 5HT also activates ERK1/2. Therefore, the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway by 5HT and redox-sensitive pathways by LPC and H2O2 may explain the synergistic interaction in our studies. Watanabe et al21 and Cox et al22 showed that H2O2, LPC, and oxLDL act synergistically with 5HT in vasoconstriction, which may also support our findings.

Our previous studies have shown that the mitogenic effect of 5HT on VSMCs is mediated predominantly by 5HT2 receptors.8 9 5HT acting via the 5HT2 receptor subtype induced a 5-fold increase in the mobilization of intracellular calcium and a 10-fold increase in c-fos mRNA in VSMCs.23 In the present study, the 5HT2 receptor antagonist LY281067 reversed only the mitogenic effect of 5HT but not those of LPC and H2O2 on VSMCs.

This study suggests that PC, the major component of nLDL,17 does not have a significant mitogenic effect on VSMCs and that this effect is not enhanced by 5HT. LPC and ROS, the major components of moxLDL, act synergistically in inducing DNA synthesis. The increase in DNA synthesis induced by the combined use of LPC (1 µmol/L) and H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) (262±8% of the control) is similar to that of moxLDL (5 µg/mL) (211±25%), which suggests that the mitogenic effect of moxLDL may be due to the combined effects of LPC and ROS, which are present in moxLDL. The oxLDL was less mitogenic than moxLDL because the major component of oxLDL is LPC. Under physiological conditions that include the presence of various antioxidants in the plasma, complete oxidation of LDL may not be feasible, but these conditions are more likely to result in partial oxidation of LDL with production of moxLDL, which is the most atherogenic of the 3 forms of LDL. Thus, moxLDL interacting with other vasoactive substances and growth factors present in the vasculature may play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and restenosis after restenosis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants RO1-HL-39916 and RO1-HL-50653 and an American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid.


*    Footnotes
 
Guest Editor for this article was Joseph Loscalzo, MD, PhD, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Received July 28, 2000; revision received September 27, 2000; accepted October 3, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Bauters C, Isner JM. The biology of restenosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997;40:107–116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Steinberg D. Low density lipoprotein oxidation and its pathobiological significance. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:20963–20966.[Free Full Text]

3. Stiko A, Regnstrom J, Shah PK, et al. Active oxygen species and lysophosphatidylcholine are involved in oxidized low density lipoprotein activation of smooth muscle cell DNA synthesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:194–200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Rao GN, Berk BC. Active oxygen species stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell growth and proto-oncogene expression. Circ Res. 1992;70:593–599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Chai YC, Howe PH, DiCorleto PE, et al. Oxidized low density lipoprotein and lysophosphatidylcholine stimulate cell cycle entry in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17791–17797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Kohno M, Yokokawa K, Yasunari K, et al. Induction by lysophosphatidylcholine, a major phospholipid component of atherogenic lipoproteins, of human coronary artery smooth muscle cell migration. Circulation. 1998;98:353–359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Pakala R, Willerson JT, Benedict CR. Effect of serotonin, thromboxane A2, and specific receptor antagonists on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation. 1997;96:2280–2286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Vikenes K, Farstad M, Nordrehaug JE. Serotonin is associated with coronary artery disease and cardiac events. Circulation. 1999;100:483–489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Koba S, Pakala R, Watanabe T, et al. Vascular smooth muscle proliferation: synergistic interaction between serotonin and low density lipoproteins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1644–1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Griendling KK, Sorescu D, Ushio-Fukai M. NAD(P)H oxidase: role in cardiovascular biology and disease. Circ Res. 2000;86:494–501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Yokoyama M, Inoue N, Kawashima S. Role of the vascular NADH/NADPH oxidase system in atherosclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;902:241–248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Nilsson J, Dahlgren B, Ares M, et al. Lipoprotein-like phospholipid particles inhibit the smooth muscle cell cytotoxicity of lysophosphatidylcholine and platelet-activating factor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:13–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Li PF, Dietz R, von Harsdorf R. Differential effect of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion on apoptosis and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 1997;96:3602–3609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Auge N, Pieraggi MT, Thiers JC, et al. Proliferation and cytotoxic effects of mildly oxidized low-density lipoproteins on vascular smooth-muscle cells. Biochem J. 1995;309:1015–1020.

15. Kikuta K, Sawamura T, Miwa S, et al. High-affinity arginine transport of bovine aortic endothelial cells is impaired by lysophosphatidylcholine. Circ Res. 1998;83:1088–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Chen Y, Morimoto S, Kitano S, et al. Lysophosphatidylcholine causes Ca2+ influx, enhanced DNA synthesis and cytotoxicity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. 1995;112:69–76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Yamakawa T, Eguchi S, Yamakawa Y, et al. Lysophosphatidylcholine stimulates MAP kinase activity in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1998;31:248–253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Rao GN, Glasgow WC, Eling TE, et al. Role of hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acids in oxidative stress-induced protein (AP-1) activity. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:27760–27764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Abe J, Kusuhara M, Ulevitch RJ, et al. Big mitogen-activated protein kinase1 (BMK1) is a redox-sensitive kinase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:16586–16590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Banes A, Florian JA, Watta SW. Mechanisms of 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptor activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in vascular smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291:1179–1187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Watanabe K, Okatani Y, Sagara Y. Potentiating effect of hydrogen peroxide on the serotonin-induced vasocontraction in human umbilical artery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:783–789.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Cox DA, Cohen ML. Selective enhancement of 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced contraction of porcine coronary artery by oxidized low-density lipoprotein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992;261:856–862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Corson MA, Alexander RW, Berk BC. 5-HT2 receptor mRNA is overexpressed in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells relative to normal aorta. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:C309–C315. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Fukui, H. Ose, G. Hasegawa, T. Yoshikawa, and N. Nakamura
Association Between Urinary Albumin Excretion and Plasma 5-Hydroxyindole-3-Acetic Acid Concentration in Men With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2649 - 2651.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Damirin, H. Tomura, M. Komachi, J.-P. Liu, C. Mogi, M. Tobo, J.-Q. Wang, T. Kimura, A. Kuwabara, Y. Yamazaki, et al.
Role of lipoprotein-associated lysophospholipids in migratory activity of coronary artery smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2513 - H2522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Rius, J. Martinez-Gonzalez, J. Crespo, and L. Badimon
Involvement of Neuron-Derived Orphan Receptor-1 (NOR-1) in LDL-Induced Mitogenic Stimulus in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: Role of CREB
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2004; 24(4): 697 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
I. GOUNI-BERTHOLD and A. SACHINIDIS
Does the coronary risk factor low density lipoprotein alter growth and signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells?
FASEB J, October 1, 2002; 16(12): 1477 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Watanabe, R. Pakala, T. Katagiri, and C. R. Benedict
Synergistic Effect of Urotensin II With Mildly Oxidized LDL on DNA Synthesis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Circulation, July 3, 2001; 104(1): 16 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, C. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors