Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:1410-1415

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paradisi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paradisi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, A. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*GLUCOSE
*TESTOSTERONE
Related Collections
Right arrow Obesity
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2001;103:1410.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Is Associated With Endothelial Dysfunction

Giancarlo Paradisi, MD; Helmut O. Steinberg, MD; Annette Hempfling, RN; Jessica Cronin, RN; Ginger Hook, RN; Marguerite K. Shepard, MD; Alain D. Baron, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine (G.P., H.O.S., A.H., J.C., G.H., M.K.S., A.D.B.), and the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (A.D.B.), Indianapolis, Ind.

Correspondence to Alain D. Baron, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine, 541 N Clinical Dr, CL 459, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5111. E-mail abaron{at}iupui.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—We recently reported endothelial dysfunction as a novel cardiovascular risk factor associated with insulin resistance/obesity. Here, we tested whether hyperandrogenic insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are at increased risk of macrovascular disease display impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and whether endothelial function in PCOS is associated with particular metabolic and/or hormonal characteristics.

Methods and Results—We studied leg blood flow (LBF) responses to graded intrafemoral artery infusions of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator methacholine chloride (MCh) and to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in 12 obese women with PCOS and in 13 healthy age- and weight-matched control subjects (OBW). LBF increments in response to MCh were 50% lower in the PCOS group than in the OBW group (P<0.01). Euglycemic hyperinsulinemia increased LBF above baseline by 30% in the PCOS and 60% in OBW group (P<0.05 between groups). Across all subjects, the maximal LBF response to MCh exhibited a strong inverse correlation with free testosterone levels (r=-0.52, P<0.007). This relationship was stronger than with any other parameter, including insulin sensitivity.

Conclusions—PCOS is characterized by (1) endothelial dysfunction and (2) resistance to the vasodilating action of insulin. This endothelial dysfunction appears to be associated with both elevated androgen levels and insulin resistance. Given the central vasoprotective role of endothelium, these findings could explain, at least in part, the increased risk for macrovascular disease in women with PCOS.


Key Words: blood flow • insulin • glucose • nitric oxide • hormones


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We recently reported that obese insulin-resistant subjects, as a group, are characterized by impaired insulin-mediated vasodilation,1 reduced vasodilation to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator methacholine chloride (MCh), and blunting of the effect of insulin to enhance endothelium-dependent vasodilation.2 The contribution of endothelial dysfunction to the increased risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in insulin-resistant subjects has been discussed extensively.2 3 Interestingly, on closer analysis of our data,1 we observed that obese women (OBW), in contrast to obese men, display endothelial function (MCh-induced vasodilation) that is similar to that of lean men.4 These sex differences suggested that sex hormones could modulate endothelial function. This hypothesis is consistent with epidemiological and experimental reports describing a protective effect of female hormonal patterns on the macrovasculature. Cardiovascular events are less prevalent in premenopausal women and in women receiving estrogen replacement than in postmenopausal women or men.5 6 In particular, studies have shown that estrogen replacement therapy improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation,7 with favorable influences on insulin sensitivity and lipid profile.8 9 In contrast, androgens are generally considered to decrease glucose tolerance, induce insulin resistance, and increase cardiovascular risk in women10 as well as in men.11

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represent an intriguing biological experiment of nature that illustrates hormonal effects on cardiovascular risk. These patients, characterized by elevated testosterone levels, hirsutism, and oligomenorrhea,12 are typically obese and insulin resistant and are suspected to be at increased risk for cardiovascular disease.13 14 15 Therefore, this premenopausal subject group presents an interesting and propitious constellation of clinical findings that allows one to evaluate whether a male hormonal pattern abrogates the protective sex effects on endothelial function in OBW.

Thus, the present study was designed to test the hypothesis that women with PCOS display endothelial dysfunction and if so, to determine whether this abnormality is related to elevated testosterone levels.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
The characteristics of the study groups are shown in Table 1Down. Twelve OBW with PCOS were recruited for the study. PCOS was diagnosed by an elevation of free testosterone (FT) levels, associated with hirsutism and amenorrhea or chronic oligomenorrhea (<6 periods per year).12 Nonovarian causes of hyperandrogenism were not formally excluded. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI)=30, and fat content was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA; system software 1.2; Lunar DPX-L). The weight limit for accurate determination of body composition with our DXA equipment is 110 kg; therefore, in 1 PCOS subject weighing >110 kg, body fat content was measured by underwater weighing. Thirteen normal OBW matched with PCOS for age, weight, and body fat served as control subjects. They had regular menses every 27 to 31 days and no hirsutism or abnormal FT levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics

All study subjects except 1 were normotensive and euglycemic. One woman with PCOS exhibited impaired glucose tolerance and chronic hypertension. Because both of these disorders are associated with endothelial dysfunction,16 including this woman in the study group could have introduced a bias in detecting whether PCOS per se determines impairment of endothelial function. Our results were similar, however, with and without inclusion of this woman. Thus, we decided to include her in the study group. None of the women were taking medications known to affect carbohydrate or sex hormone metabolism. All studies were performed regardless of the phase of the menstrual cycle. Studies were approved by the Indiana University Human Subjects Institutional Review Board, and all volunteers gave informed consent.

Protocol
At {approx}7:00 AM, after an overnight 14-hour fast, a catheter was inserted into the antecubital vein for infusions of substances. Subsequently, the right femoral artery and vein were cannulated. A 6F sheath (Cordis Corp) was placed in the right femoral vein to allow the insertion of a custom-designed 5F double-lumen thermodilution catheter (Baxter Scientific, Edwards Division) to measure leg blood flow (LBF) as previously described.17 The right femoral artery was cannulated with a 5.5F double-lumen catheter (Arrow International) to allow simultaneous infusion of substances through the proximal (most caudad) and invasive blood pressure monitoring through the distal (most cephalad) port. Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were monitored continuously via precordial leads and a pressure transducer connected to a vital signs monitor (VSM 1, Physiocontrol).

Hemodynamic Measurements
LBF, MAP, and heart rate measurements were obtained at baseline and during intrafemoral artery infusion of MCh at sequential doses of 5, 10, and 15 µg/min. All hemodynamic measurements were repeated after {approx}200 minutes of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia.

Whole-Body Glucose Disposal: Leg Glucose Uptake
Whole-body glucose disposal was assessed with the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique as previously described.1 Each clamp was performed during a 4-hour square-wave infusion of insulin at a rate of 120 mU · m-2 · min-1.

Leg glucose uptake (LGU) was calculated as the product of the blood arteriovenous glucose difference (AVG{Delta}) and LBF, LGU=AVG{Delta}xLBF. Plasma glucose was converted to blood glucose by the following formula: blood glucose=plasma glucosex(1-0.3xhematocrit).

Statistical Analysis
Results are shown as the mean±SEM. Leg vascular resistance (LVR) was defined as LVR=MAP/LBF and is expressed in arbitrary units (U). Changes in blood flow are expressed as percent change (%{Delta}) to adjust for the differences at baseline. GDR is expressed as mg · kg lean body mass-1 · min-1. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare the responses to the graded MCh infusions. One-tailed paired and unpaired t tests were performed as appropriate for comparisons within or between groups. Simple linear regression and partial correlation analysis were performed to assess the relationship between the maximal increase in LBF in response to the intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh and the hormonal and metabolic characteristics studied. Subsequently, variables whose correlation with the maximum LBF response to the intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh achieved near statistical significance (P<0.1) were entered into a stepwise regression model to assess the magnitude of their individual effects on the maximum LBF response to the intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh. Statistical significance was accepted at a level of P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Rates of Whole Body Glucose Uptake and LGU
As expected, glucose disposal rate (GDR) was lower in the PCOS subjects than in OBW (4.78±0.54 versus 7.62±0.48 mg · kg-1 · min-1, P<0.0006, respectively), despite the higher insulin levels (358±22 versus 294±19 µU/mL, P<0.05). This difference in insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism between groups was even more striking when GDR was normalized to lean mass (P<0.0005, Figure 1ADown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Rates of whole-body insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in control (open boxes) and PCOS (solid circles) subjects during 240 minutes of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (120 mU · m-2 · min-1). B, Rates of LGU in control (open boxes) and PCOS (solid circles) subjects under basal conditions and after 200 minutes during steady-state euglycemic hyperinsulinemia.

To further evaluate the ability of insulin to stimulate LBF and muscle glucose uptake, we analyzed LGU in both groups studied. As illustrated (Figure 1BUp), under basal conditions LGU was similar in OBW and PCOS women (P=NS) as a result of similar LBF and AVG{Delta} (0.28±0.02 versus 0.31±0.04 L/min, P=NS, and 2.1±0.3 versus 1.7±0.3 mg/dL, P=NS, respectively). Conversely, during steady-state euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, LGU in PCOS was nearly 40% lower than in OBW (P<0.01). The differences in LGU between the 2 groups reflect their differences in LBF and AVG{Delta}, for which PCOS displayed both smaller increments in muscle glucose extraction, as indicated by their lower AVG{Delta} (21.4±1.8 versus 14.9±2.4 mg/dL, P<0.03 versus OBW), and somewhat reduced rates of insulin-mediated LBF (0.43±0.04 versus 0.37±0.03 L/min, P=0.10 versus OBW).

Lipids
Lipid patterns of PCOS and OBW are shown in Table 1Up. PCOS had lower HDL-cholesterol levels and nearly 40% higher triglyceride levels with respect to OBW (P<0.01). No differences were seen between the 2 groups with regard to the other lipids.

Hemodynamic Data
MAP was somewhat higher in PCOS, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 1Up). MAP did not change in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in the PCOS group. In OBW, conversely, MAP displayed an {approx}7% decrease from basal values (P<0.003). In response to the intrafemoral artery infusion of MCh, MAP was unchanged under either basal or hyperinsulinemic conditions in both groups.

Vascular Reactivity
Basal LBF was 0.28±0.02 and 0.31±0.04 L/min in OBW and PCOS, respectively (P=NS). Euglycemic hyperinsulinemia induced a 58.6±15.5% increase in LBF in insulin-sensitive OBW (P<0.003), whereas in insulin-resistant PCOS, the increment in LBF was only 29.5±14.8% (P=NS). LBF showed a significant dose-dependent increase (P<0.01) in response to graded intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh in both groups. Compared with OBW, LBF increments in response to the intrafemoral artery infusion of MCh were on average {approx}50% lower (Figure 2ADown) in the PCOS group (P<0.01). The diminished response to the intrafemoral artery infusion of MCh suggests that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in women with PCOS. During steady-state euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, the LBF rise above baseline was 50% lower in PCOS than in OBW (P<0.05) (Figure 3ADown). Thus, the blunted effect of insulin to induce vasodilation in PCOS suggests that these women display resistance to the vascular action of insulin.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. LBF increments (A) and LVR decrements (B) relative to baseline (% {Delta}) in response to graded intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh in control (open boxes) and PCOS (solid circles) subjects.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Percent increase above baseline in LBF (A) and percent reduction below baseline in LVR (B) in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (120 mU · m-2 · min-1) in control (open boxes) and PCOS (solid circles) subjects.

Basal LVR was similar in the OBW and PCOS groups (354±23 versus 354±31 U, respectively, P=NS). Conversely, during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, LVR was significantly lower in OBW than in PCOS (224±18 versus 279±27 U, P<0.05). The percent decrease in LVR below baseline in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia was also more marked in OBW than in PCOS (P<0.03, Figure 3BUp). In response to the intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh, LVR decreased in a dose-dependent manner in both groups, and changes in LVR mirrored the changes in LBF. Changes in LVR were significantly more pronounced in OBW than in PCOS women (P<0.01, Figure 2BUp).

Correlational Analyses
The results of the regression analysis (Table 2Down) suggest that levels of FT and total testosterone are directly associated with the magnitude of impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. A strong negative association was also found between the degree of obesity (as gauged by BMI) and the maximal increase in LBF in response to MCh. GDR (insulin sensitivity) and the maximum LBF response to MCh were directly associated; however, this relation did not quite achieve statistical significance (P=0.062). Because FT, BMI, and GDR were interrelated, we performed stepwise regression analysis to evaluate their independent contribution to predict the endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Stepwise regression analysis (Table 3Down) revealed that FT accounted for 27% of the variance of the maximum LBF response to MCh under basal conditions (Figure 4Down), whereas BMI contributed an additional 18%. GDR did not contribute to the regression model.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Correlational Analyses between the Maximum Percent Increase in LBF in Response to Graded Intrafemoral Artery Infusions of MCL and Various Relevant Parameters


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Stepwise Regression Analysis for the Relationship between FT and BMI and the Maximum Change in LBF in Response to the Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilator MCh



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Linear regression analysis between the maximum LBF response (% {Delta}) to intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh and FT levels across all subjects (solid circles, OBW; open circles, PCOS).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of this study reveal the following new findings: (1) compared with age- and weight-matched control subjects, women with PCOS exhibit an {approx}50% reduction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation; (2) the physiological ability of insulin to cause endothelium-dependent vasodilation is markedly impaired in PCOS; and (3) endothelial function is inversely and strongly related to FT levels.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was examined after an overnight fast (basal insulin levels) by measuring the LBF response to graded intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh. MCh-induced vasodilation is a well-established method to assess endothelial relaxing function and is considered to largely reflect NO production/release.18 Therefore, the data suggest that diminished vasodilatory response to MCh in women with PCOS is due, at least in part, to impaired production/release of NO.

Hyperinsulinemia caused LBF to rise above baseline by {approx}30% in PCOS and by {approx}60% in OBW subjects (P<0.05). These findings indicate that women with PCOS display resistance to the vasodilatory action of insulin.

In keeping with other reports, women with PCOS exhibited a remarkable defect in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, with {approx}38% lower whole-body GDRs.19 As stated in the Methods section, control subjects were not studied at a consistent phase of the menstrual cycle, whereas women with PCOS were studied mostly in anovulatory status. If endothelial function and insulin sensitivity vary during the menstrual cycle,20 21 this could confound our results. When we analyzed the data from OBW according to the phase of the menstrual cycle, however, we found that endothelial function, as expressed by the maximal LBF response to MCh and steady-state GDRs of 7 women who were in the follicular phase, was similar to that of the 6 women studied during the luteal phase (232±41% versus 234±44%, P=NS, and 15.1±1 versus 15.3±1.5 mg · kg lean body mass-1 · min-1, P=NS, respectively). Therefore, it is not likely that the differences observed in endothelial function and insulin sensitivity between OBW and PCOS were greatly influenced by differences in menstrual cycle phase.

It is interesting to note that GDRs were directly related to the magnitude of the action of insulin to vasodilate (r=0.421, P<0.04). These data are consistent with our previously published reports in non-PCOS subjects supporting a strong association (metabolic coupling) between the vascular action of insulin and its overall effect on glucose metabolism.22 Reduced insulin-mediated glucose disposal exhibited by PCOS was reflected at the level of skeletal muscle. Indeed, whereas LGU was similar in the 2 groups under basal conditions, during hyperinsulinemia, LGU in PCOS was {approx}40% lower than in OBW. This reduction of insulin-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake was mostly due to reductions in glucose extraction (reflected by reduced AVG{Delta}) and to a lesser degree to reduced rates of glucose and/or insulin delivery (reflected by lower rates of LBF). Given the previously reported relationship between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance, it follows logically that the marked insulin resistance displayed by women with PCOS could account in large part for the endothelial dysfunction. It is important to consider, however, that insulin resistance is not the only characteristic of PCOS, which may have a detrimental effect on endothelial function. Androgens,23 dyslipidemia,24 obesity,2 25 and hypertension26 all may affect endothelial function. Therefore, we analyzed all the variables to assess which of these play a major determinant role in the endothelial dysfunction displayed by women with PCOS.

As in our previous study,2 we observed a strong negative correlation between BMI and the peak vasodilation in response to MCh. BMI, together with FT, was shown to be a powerful predictor of endothelial function, being able to explain 18% and 27%, respectively, of the variance in maximal endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Thus, obesity appears to have a significant modulating effect on endothelial function in women, independent of their hormonal status. In addition, given a certain degree of adiposity, hyperandrogenism appears to have an additive negative effect on endothelial function.

By design, women with PCOS exhibited total testosterone and FT levels 2- and 4-fold higher, respectively, than those observed in OBW women. Perhaps the most intriguing finding in our study is the strong negative correlations between both total testosterone and FT and the peak vasodilation induced by MCh across all subjects, suggesting that increased androgen levels may impair endothelial function. As stated above, elevated FT levels were part of the selection criteria for PCOS. Therefore, to exclude the possibility that the correlation between FT and peak vasodilation induced by MCh could be influenced by other factors associated with PCOS, we performed a further analysis adjusting the relation for the variables that differed significantly between groups (eg, GDR, fasting insulin, HDL, triglyceride). This analysis revealed that the correlation remained significant (r=-0.41, P<0.05). We did not measure serum sex hormone–binding globulin levels. Given that insulin resistance leads to a decrease in serum sex hormone–binding globulin, resulting in elevated FT levels,27 28 this could possibly strengthen the negative relation between FT and endothelial function.

Consistent with our results, Herman et al23 reported that androgen deprivation in men is associated with enhanced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Conversely, it has also been shown that estrogen supplementation failed to improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in men but did so in women.29 30 Therefore, it seems plausible that a deleterious effect of androgens rather than simply beneficial effects of estrogens may contribute to the observed sex difference in the risk of macrovascular disease in healthy subjects. In women with PCOS, androgen levels appear to be major contributors to endothelial dysfunction and, as such, a major potential mechanism of macrovascular disease in these patients.

In keeping with other reports, total and LDL cholesterol levels in PCOS subjects were similar to those observed in weight-matched control women.31 Moreover, there was no relationship between these lipids and FT or with steady-state GDRs (insulin sensitivity). Therefore, it is highly unlikely that these lipid parameters could account for the differences in endothelial function observed between our study groups. Women with PCOS had lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglyceride levels than control women. As in our previous reports,2 these lipids did not correlate with the peak endothelium-dependent vasodilation induced by MCh, although one cannot completely exclude an indirect contribution. Free fatty acid levels were similar in control and PCOS subjects and thus also cannot account for the difference in endothelium-dependent vasodilation observed between groups. In keeping with most studies, we found that resting blood pressure was not significantly higher in women with PCOS than in weight- and age-matched control subjects.32 Moreover, blood pressure did not correlate with the maximum response to intrafemoral artery infusions of MCh. Thus, it is not likely that the large difference in endothelial function observed between the study groups is related to the modest differences in blood pressure levels.

In conclusion, this study provides the first evidence that PCOS is characterized by endothelial dysfunction. This endothelial dysfunction appears to be most strongly associated with both elevated androgen levels and obesity/insulin resistance. Given the central vasoprotective role of the endothelium, these findings could explain, at least in part, the suspected increased risk for macrovascular disease in women with PCOS. Although the mechanism by which male hormone pattern/insulin resistance determines endothelial dysfunction remains to be defined, the data support the hypothesis that clinical strategies aimed at reducing both androgens and insulin resistance33 34 would have the most beneficial cardioprotective effects in women with PCOS.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants DK-42469, MO1-RR750-19, and DK-20452 from the National Institutes of Health and a Veterans Affairs Merit Review Award. Dr Giancarlo Paradisi was the recipient of a grant from the A. Griffini Foundation of Varese, Italy.

Received April 30, 1999; revision received November 17, 2000; accepted November 18, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Laakso M, Edelman SV, Olefsky JM, et al. Kinetics of in vivo muscle insulin mediated glucose uptake in human obesity. Diabetes. 1990;39:965–974.[Abstract]
  2. Steinberg H, Chaker H, Leaming R, et al. Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction: implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2601–2610.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Cleland SJ, Petrie JR, Ueda S, et al. Insulin as a vascular hormone: implications for the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25:175–184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Steinberg HO, Paradisi G, Cronin J, et al. Type II diabetes abrogates sex differences in endothelial function in premenopausal women. Circulation. 2000;101:2040–2046.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow up of the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1986;111:383–390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Colditz GA, Willet WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1105–1110.[Abstract]
  7. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, et al. Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:936–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wilcox JG, Hwang J, Hodis HN, et al. Cardioprotective effects of individual conjugated equine estrogens through their possible modulation of insulin resistance and oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:57–62.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Brussaard HE, Gevers Leuven JA, Frolich M, et al. Short-term oestrogen replacement therapy improves insulin resistance, lipids and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women with NIDDM. Diabetologia. 1997;40:843–849.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Haffner SM, Katz MS, Stern MP, et al. The relationship of sex hormones to hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. Metabolism. 1988;37:683–688.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Percheron C, Colette C, Mariano-Goulart D, et al. Relationship between insulin sensitivity, obesity, body fat distribution and ß-endorphinaemia in obese women. Int J Obes Relat Metabol Disord. 1998;22:143–148.
  12. Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:853–861.[Free Full Text]
  13. Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implication for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev. 1997;18:774–800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wild RA, Grubb BG, Hartz A, et al. Clinical signs of androgen excess as risk factors for coronary artery disease. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:255–259.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Birdsall MA, Farquhar CM, White HD. Association between polycystic ovaries and extent of coronary artery disease in women having cardiac catheterization. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:32–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Baron AD, Steinberg HO. Endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, and hypertension. Circulation. 1997;96:725–726.
  17. Baron AD, Brechtel G, Wallace P, et al. Rates and tissue sites of non-insulin and insulin mediated glucose uptake in humans. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:E769–E774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Palmer RMJ, Ferrige AJ, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature. 1987;327:524–526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Dunaif A, Segal KR, Futterweit W, et al. Profound peripheral insulin resistance, independent of obesity, in polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes. 1989;38:1165–1174.[Abstract]
  20. Valdes CT, Elkind Hirsch KE. Intravenous glucose tolerance test derived insulin sensitivity changes during the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72:642–646.[Abstract]
  21. Hashimoto M, Akishita M, Eto M, et al. Modulation of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery by sex and menstrual cycle. Circulation. 1995;92:3431–3435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Baron AD, Steinberg HO, Chaker H, et al. Insulin-mediated skeletal muscle vasodilation contributes to both insulin sensitivity and responsiveness in lean humans. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:786–792.
  23. Herman SM, Robinson JTC, McCredie RJ, et al. Androgen deprivation is associated with enhanced endothelium-dependent dilatation in adult men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2004–2009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Creager MA, Gallagher SJ, Girerd XJ, et al. L-Arginine improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1248–1253.
  25. Hashimoto M, Akishita M, Eto M, et al. The impairment of flow-mediated vasodilation in obese men with visceral fat accumulation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:477–484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Panza JA, Casino PR, Bader DM, et al. Effects of increased availability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide precursor on independent vascular relaxation in normal subjects and in patients with essential hypertension. Circulation. 1993;87:1475–1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Botwood N, Hamilton-Fairley D, Kiddy D, et al. Sex hormone-binding globulin and female reproductive function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;53:529–531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pugeat M, Crave JC, Elmidani M, et al. Pathophysiology of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG): relation to insulin. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;40:841–849.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Kawano H, Motoyama T, Kugiyama K, et al. Gender differences in improvement of endothelial-dependent vasodilation after estrogen supplementation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:914–919.[Abstract]
  30. Collins P, Rosano GM, Sarrel PM, et al. 17ß-Estradiol attenuates acetylcholine-induced coronary arterial constriction in women but not men with coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1995;92:24–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Graf MJ, Richards CJ, Brown V, et al. The independent effects of hyperandrogenaemia, hyperinsulinaemia, and obesity on lipid and lipoprotein profiles in women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990;33:119–131.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Talbott E, Guzick D, Clerici A, et al. Coronary heart disease risk factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:821–826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ehrmann DA, Schneider DJ, Sobel BE, et al. Troglitazone improves defects in insulin action, insulin secretion, ovarian steroidogenesis, and fibrinolysis in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:2108–2116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pasquali R, Casimirri F, Vincennati V. Weight control and its beneficial effect on fertility in women with obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:82–87.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Romualdi, B. Costantini, L. Selvaggi, M. Giuliani, F. Cristello, F. Macri, A. Bompiani, A. Lanzone, and M. Guido
Metformin improves endothelial function in normoinsulinemic PCOS patients: a new prospective
Hum. Reprod., June 20, 2008; (2008) den230v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Meendering, B. N. Torgrimson, N. P. Miller, P. F. Kaplan, and C. T. Minson
Estrogen, medroxyprogesterone acetate, endothelial function, and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in young women
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1630 - H1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. E. Nestler
Metformin for the Treatment of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., January 3, 2008; 358(1): 47 - 54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Heutling, H. Schulz, I. Nickel, J. Kleinstein, P. Kaltwasser, S. Westphal, F. Mittermayer, M. Wolzt, K. Krzyzanowska, H. Randeva, et al.
Asymmetrical Dimethylarginine, Inflammatory and Metabolic Parameters in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome before and after Metformin Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 82 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Cascella, S. Palomba, I. De Sio, F. Manguso, F. Giallauria, B. De Simone, D. Tafuri, G. Lombardi, A. Colao, and F. Orio
Visceral fat is associated with cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Shroff, A. Kerchner, M. Maifeld, E. J. R. Van Beek, D. Jagasia, and A. Dokras
Young Obese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Have Evidence of Early Coronary Atherosclerosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4609 - 4614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. Muniyappa, M. Montagnani, K. K. Koh, and M. J. Quon
Cardiovascular Actions of Insulin
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2007; 28(5): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Luque-Ramirez, F. Alvarez-Blasco, C. Mendieta-Azcona, J. I. Botella-Carretero, and H. F. Escobar-Morreale
Obesity Is the Major Determinant of the Abnormalities in Blood Pressure Found in Young Women with the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2141 - 2148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M.-J. Chen, W.-S. Yang, J.-H. Yang, C.-L. Chen, H.-N. Ho, and Y.-S. Yang
Relationship Between Androgen Levels and Blood Pressure in Young Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1442 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. A. Beckman, A. B. Goldfine, A. Dunaif, M. Gerhard-Herman, and M. A. Creager
Endothelial Function Varies According to Insulin Resistance Disease Type
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2007; 30(5): 1226 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. S. Legro
A 27-Year-Old Woman With a Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
JAMA, February 7, 2007; 297(5): 509 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A Dagre, J Lekakis, C Mihas, A Protogerou, L Thalassinou, D Tryfonopoulos, G Douridas, C Papamichael, and M Alevizaki
Association of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate with endothelial function in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 154(6): 883 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, T. Paterakis, K. Alexandraki, C. Piperi, A. Aessopos, I. Katsikis, N. Katsilambros, G. Kreatsas, and D. Panidis
Indices of low-grade chronic inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome and the beneficial effect of metformin
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1426 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Paradisi, A. Biaggi, R. Savone, F. Ianniello, C. Tomei, L. Caforio, and A. Caruso
Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Healthy Women with Previous Gestational Hypertension
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1233 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Topcu, M. Caliskan, E. E. Ozcimen, D. Tok, A. Uckuyu, D. Erdogan, H. Gullu, A. Yildirir, H. Zeyneloglu, and H. Muderrisoglu
Do young women with polycystic ovary syndrome show early evidence of preclinical coronary artery disease?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 930 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Eisenhardt, N. Schwarzmann, V. Henschel, A. Germeyer, M. von Wolff, A. Hamann, and T. Strowitzki
Early Effects of Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 946 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
B. Barutcuoglu, A. E. Bozdemir, D. Dereli, Z. Parildar, M. I. Mutaf, D. Ozmen, and O. Bayindir
Increased Serum Neopterin Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2006; 36(3): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Orio Jr., S. Palomba, T. Cascella, B. De Simone, F. Manguso, S. Savastano, T. Russo, A. Tolino, F. Zullo, G. Lombardi, et al.
Improvement in Endothelial Structure and Function after Metformin Treatment in Young Normal-Weight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Results of a 6-Month Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6072 - 6076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Lakhani, A. Leonard, A.M. Seifalian, and P. Hardiman
Microvascular dysfunction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3219 - 3224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Meyer, B. P. McGrath, and H. J. Teede
Overweight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Have Evidence of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5711 - 5716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Kravariti, K. K. Naka, S. N. Kalantaridou, N. Kazakos, C. S. Katsouras, A. Makrigiannakis, E. A. Paraskevaidis, G. P. Chrousos, A. Tsatsoulis, and L. K. Michalis
Predictors of Endothelial Dysfunction in Young Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5088 - 5095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Meyer, B. P. McGrath, J. Cameron, D. Kotsopoulos, and H. J. Teede
Vascular Dysfunction and Metabolic Parameters in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4630 - 4635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
E Diamanti-Kandarakis, K Alexandraki, A Protogerou, C Piperi, C Papamichael, A Aessopos, J Lekakis, and M Mavrikakis
Metformin administration improves endothelial function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 152(5): 749 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]