Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:102-107

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmieri, V.
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palmieri, V.
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, R. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Echocardiography

(Circulation. 2001;103:102.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Left Ventricular Geometry and Systolic Function in Hypertensive Subjects

Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study

Vittorio Palmieri, MD; Jonathan N. Bella, MD; Donna K. Arnett, PhD; Jennifer E. Liu, MD; Albert Oberman, MD, MPH; Min-Yan Schuck, MD; Dalane W. Kitzman, MD; Paul N. Hopkins, MD, MSPH; Derek Morgan, AB; D. C. Rao, PhD; Richard B. Devereux, MD

From the Weill Medical College of Cornell University (V.P., J.N.B., J.E.L., M.-Y.S., R.B.D.), New York, NY; University of Minnesota (D.K.A.), Minneapolis, Minn; University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.O.), Birmingham, Ala; Wake Forest University School of Medicine (D.W.K.), Winston-Salem, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (P.N.H.), Salt Lake City, Utah; and Washington University Medical School (D.M., D.C.R.), St. Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Vittorio Palmieri, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Division of Cardiology (Box 222), 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail: vpalmier{at}med.cornell.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Type 2 diabetes is a cardiovascular risk factor. It remains to be elucidated in a large, population-based sample whether diabetes is associated with changes in left ventricular (LV) structure and systolic function independent of obesity and systolic blood pressure (BP).

Methods and Results—Among 1950 hypertensive participants in the HyperGEN Study without overt coronary heart disease or significant valve disease, 20% (n=386) had diabetes. Diabetics were more likely to be women, black, older, and have higher BMI and waist/hip ratio than were nondiabetics. After adjustment for age and sex, diabetics had higher systolic BP, pulse pressure, and heart rate; lower diastolic BP; and longer duration of hypertension than nondiabetics. LV mass and relative wall thickness were higher in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects independent of covariates. Compared with nondiabetic hypertensives, diabetics had lower stress-corrected midwall shortening, independent of covariates, without difference in LV EF. Insulin levels and insulin resistance were higher in non–insulin-treated diabetics (n=195) than nondiabetic (n=1439) subjects (both P<0.01). Insulin resistance positively but weakly related to LV mass and relative wall thickness.

Conclusions—In a relatively healthy, population-based sample of hypertensive adults, type 2 diabetes was associated with higher LV mass, more concentric LV geometry, and lower myocardial function, independent of age, sex, body size, and arterial BP. structural and functional abnormalities in addition to, and independent of, atherosclerosis.13 14 In the Framingham cohort, diabetes was associated with higher LV mass in women but not men.15 High blood pressure (BP), obesity, and abnormal lipid profile, which often coexist with diabetes, tend to be associated with preclinical cardiovascular abnormalities16 and may contribute to the association of diabetes with cardiovascular events. Cardiac features of diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive subjects remain incompletely described in population-based samples. Therefore, we compared clinical and metabolic characteristics, LV geometry, and systolic function between diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive participants in the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Population
The HyperGEN Study is part of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Blood Pressure Program to assess the genetic basis of hypertension in the population. Hypertension was defined by antihypertensive treatment or recorded (BP) measurements >=140 mm Hg systolic and/or >=90 mm Hg diastolic on >=2 occasions. To be eligible, hypertensive subjects were required to have onset of hypertension by age 60 years and >=1 hypertensive sibling who was willing to participate. Individuals with type I diabetes were excluded because of high risk of hypertension due to nephropathy. Four of 5 field centers in HyperGEN participated in the ancillary echocardiographic study. Study participants were recruited from existing populations previously defined, including the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (Minneapolis and Forsyth County, North Carolina), the Minnesota Heart Study, and the Utah Healthy Family Tree Study. Selected participants from these parent studies previously participated in the NHLBI Family Heart Study,17 from which a large proportion of the hypertensive sibships were sampled for HyperGEN. Many of the Birmingham patients (all black) were selected from the community. The target population was 50% each black and white in Winston-Salem and 100% white in Minnesota and Utah.

The first HyperGEN examination began in 1996 to obtain standardized measurements of BP at rest and its reactivity to several stimuli. Standardized anthropometric measurements included body mass index (BMI), body surface area, and waist/hip ratio. Fasting serum glucose, insulin, and lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were obtained. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria18 (fasting glucose >=126 mg/dL or use of hypoglycemic medication). Insulin levels were assessed by immunoassay (Sanofi Access; reference range, 1.9 to 23 µU/mL). Insulin resistance was calculated by use of the previously validated homeostasis model assessment (HOMA).19 Myocardial infarction, coronary bypass, and percutaneous coronary angioplasty were identified by participant reports. Type and number of antihypertensive medications used were recorded at clinical evaluation.

Clinical and echocardiographic information was available for 2161 hypertensive subjects. We excluded subjects without technically satisfactory LV measurements (3.1% of the cohort) or with >=2+ aortic or mitral disease; dialysis treatment; history of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass, or percutaneous coronary angioplasty; or severe hypokinesis, akinesis, or dyskinesis on echocardiogram.

Echocardiographic Methods
Echocardiograms were performed by use of methods previously described.20 21 22 A standardized protocol was followed, under which parasternal and apical acoustic windows were used to record >=10 consecutive beats per each projection. All elements of the protocol were recorded on videotape; additional strip-chart recordings were made in 1 center. Principal sonographers received training, including written material and didactic and hands-on training at the Reading Center in New York City, NY. Additionally, test tapes were sent to each center as part of sonographer training, and feedback on echocardiographic studies was provided to monitor compliance with the protocol. Parasternal long-axis and apical views were used to detect valvular regurgitation by color Doppler.

Echocardiographic Measurements
Correct orientation of planes for imaging and Doppler recordings was verified with standard procedures.23 LV internal dimension and interventricular septal and posterior wall thicknesses were measured at end-diastole and end-systole by American Society of Echocardiography recommendations24 on <=3 cardiac cycles at or just below the tips of mitral leaflets in parasternal long-axis and short-axis views. When optimal orientation of LV M-mode readings could not be obtained, correctly oriented linear 2-dimensional measurements were made by use of the American Society of Echocardiography leading-edge convention.25 Wall motion was assessed in parasternal long-axis and short-axis views and apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views, with the LV divided into 5 segments at the base, 5 at the papillary muscles, and 4 at the apex.26 Echocardiograms were preliminarily read by a first reader and subsequently reread by highly experienced readers. All readers were blinded to subjects’ clinical data. We reported excellent reliability of LV mass measurement (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.93) and good reliability of LV systolic function assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.61 to 0.71) in a previous study,27 in which an echocardiographic methodology similar to that used in this study was employed.

Calculation of Derived Variables
End-diastolic LV dimensions were used to calculate LV mass by a formula that yields values closely related (r=0.90) to necropsy LV weight28 and has proven valuable for cardiovascular risk stratification.29 30 31 32 LV mass was indexed by height2.7 to identify LV hypertrophy with partition values of 46.7g/m2.7 in women and 49.2g/m2.7 in men.33 Relative wall thickness (RWT), an estimate of LV geometric concentricity, was calculated as twice posterior wall thickness divided by internal dimension. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes were calculated by the Teichholz method,34 which uses linear measurements of LV internal diastolic and systolic diameters, as has been validated by invasive and Doppler reference standards.21 35 36 Linear-measurement–derived ejection fraction (EF) was calculated as the percentage reduction of LV volume from diastole to end-systole. To estimate global LVEF, accounting for the contribution of each LV segment to systolic reduction of LV volume, we assigned a score of 4.5 to each segment with normal wall motion (which yielded global EF of 63%); scores of 3.5, 2.5, and 1.5 to mildly, moderately, and severely hypokinetic segments, respectively; 0 to akinetic; and -1 to dyskinetic segments.

Measures of Myocardial Function
Studies have documented that the traditional practice of relating endocardial shortening to mean meridional end-systolic stress across the LV wall may yield misleading results in individuals with concentric LV geometry37 or LV dilatation.38 Therefore, primary reliance was placed on the relation of midwall shortening (MWS) to midwall circumferential end-systolic stress (cESS) at the level of the LV minor axis.37 39 40 41 MWS was calculated by taking into account epicardial migration of the midwall during systole. Estimates of end-systolic stress by the described method were closely related to values calculated by substituting central BP estimated by applanation tonometry for cuff BP (r=0.95).37 In another sample of 418 hypertensive adults with or without diabetes, cuff systolic BP correlated closely to central BP estimated by tonometry (r=0.93), and the difference between brachial and central aortic systolic BP did not differ between diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensives (12±7 versus 13±9 mm Hg, respectively; P=0.9; M.J. Roman and R.B.D., personal communication, 2000). To evaluate LV performance while taking cESS into account, shortening calculated from echocardiographic measurements was expressed as a percentage of value predicted from cESS with equations from previously studied normal subjects37 and called "stress-corrected MWS," a measure of myocardial systolic function.41

Statistical Analyses
Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD. Unadjusted differences for clinical variables between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects were assessed by t test. Difference in laboratory data and LV systolic function were adjusted for age and sex by use of ANCOVA. Differences in LV structure and geometry were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and systolic BP as their major established covariates,22 with further adjustment for duration of hypertension. Fisher’s Exact Test and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to test differences for categorical variables in 2x2 tables. Logistic regression analysis was used to derived odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for covariates. Multiple regression analyses were performed to assess relation of diabetes to higher LV mass independent of established covariates and duration of hypertension. Two-tailed P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
General Characteristics of the Study Population
A total of 1950 participants in the HyperGEN Study met selection criteria. Mean age was 54±11 years; BMI was 32.0±7.0 kg/m2; 63% were women; 35% were white, non-Hispanic; and 65% were black. Of the participants, 20% (n=386) had type 2 diabetes, of whom 45% were treated with insulin, 43% with oral hypoglycemics, and 12% with diet only. On average, duration of diabetes was 10 years. Age at diagnosis of diabetes was 48±12 years, whereas age at diagnosis of hypertension was 39±12 years (P<0.001).

Clinical and Metabolic Features of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Hypertensive Subjects
Subjects with diabetes were older; had higher BMI, waist/hip ratio, systolic BP, pulse pressure, and heart rate; had lower diastolic BP; and were slightly more likely to be female than subjects without diabetes Table 1Down. The proportion of subjects who had smoked >100 cigarettes was similar between the groups, as was age at diagnosis of hypertension. Duration of hypertension was longer among diabetics (19±12 versus 14±11 years; P<0.001). Diabetic patients more frequently were on antihypertensive treatment than nondiabetics (94% versus 89%; P<0.01) and more frequently received ACE inhibitors (48% versus 27%; P<0.01), whereas no between-group differences were seen in ß-blocker (16% versus 20%), calcium channel blocker (45% versus 37%), or diuretic (50% versus 47%) use (all P=NS). Diabetics were more frequently on >=2 medications than nondiabetics (47% versus 34%; P<0.01), which yielded, on average, a higher number of antihypertensive medications in diabetics than nondiabetics (1.6 [range, 0 to 6] versus 1.3 [range, 0 to 5]; P<0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Features of Subjects With or Without Diabetes

Laboratory Data
After adjustments were made for age and sex, diabetic patients had higher fasting plasma glucose, triglyceride, and creatinine levels (Table 2Down). Total cholesterol did not differ between groups, but HDL cholesterol was lower and total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol and triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratios were higher in diabetics. Insulin (11.2 versus 9.7 µU/mL) and HOMA (4.5 versus 2.5) levels were higher in non–insulin-treated diabetics (n=195) than nondiabetic (n=1439) subjects (both P<0.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fasting Laboratory Data in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Hypertensive Subjects

LV Mass and Geometry
Subjects with diabetes had higher LV wall thicknesses, mass, and RWT than those without diabetes independent of age, systolic BP, BMI, and sex, with no between-group difference in LV internal diameter (Table 3Down). After additional consideration of duration of hypertension as covariate, between-group differences in LV mass (178 versus 173 g) and RWT (0.36 versus 0.35) were confirmed (both P<0.05). LV mass (178 versus 172 g) and RWT (0.36 versus 0.35, both P<0.01) remained higher in diabetics after further adjustment for variables that indicated major antihypertensive medication classes. Likelihood of LV hypertrophy was higher in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects (38% versus 26%, P=0.03; systolic BP and BMI adjusted-odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.70), but the difference did not reach statistical significance when duration of hypertension was included in the previous model (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6). Subjects with LV hypertrophy versus those without had longer duration of hypertension (18±12 versus 14±11 years; P<0.01) and tended toward longer duration of diabetes (11±10 versus 9±9 years; P=0.055). A multiple linear regression model showed significant association of diabetes with higher LV mass (t=2.2, slope=5.9; P=0.02) independent of established covariates and duration of hypertension (R=0.56; P<0.001). Bivariate relations of HOMA to LV mass (r=0.08; P<0.01) and RWT (r=0.19; P<0.001) were relatively weak and became weaker after adjustment for covariates (r=0.003, P=NS to LV mass; r=0.06, P=0.02 to RWT). Among subjects not treated with insulin, a regression model that included HOMA instead of BMI showed association of diabetes with LV mass (t=3.6, slope 3.9; P<0.001) independent of covariates (R=0.46; P<0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. LV Geometry in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Hypertensive Subjects

Myocardial Function and LV Chamber Systolic Performance
Diabetics had similar EF (either from LV linear dimension or from wall motion score) but lower MWS than did nondiabetics independent of age, sex, and BMI (Table 4Down). cESS, a measure of afterload, was higher in diabetics. Stress-corrected MWS was lower in diabetic subjects independent of covariates and variables that indicated major antihypertensive medication classes (104% versus 106%; P<0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. LV Systolic Function in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Hypertensive Subjects

LV Structure and Function in Diabetic Subjects Divided According to Antidiabetic Treatment
Insulin-treated subjects (n=175) did not differ from those not receiving insulin (n=211) in age (both mean of 57 years) or proportion of women (69% versus 64%). Blacks more commonly received insulin (83% versus 67%; P<0.0005). Systolic BP was higher in insulin-treated diabetics (141±25 versus 133±22 mm Hg; P<0.01) as was fasting glucose (180±80 versus 155±61 mg/dL; P<0.01). Diastolic BP (both 72±11 mm Hg) and BMI (34.5±7.5 versus 33.1±6.7 kg/m2) did not differ. LV mass (184±42 versus 181±42 g; P>0.1) and EF (62.4% versus 62.9%; P>0.5) were similar in insulin-treated and non–insulin-treated diabetics. RWT was higher (0.37±0.05 versus 0.36±0.05; P<0.05) and stress-corrected MWS was lower in diabetics who received insulin (102±10% versus 105±10%, P<0.01) independent of covariates.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In a large, population-based cohort of substantially clinically healthy diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensives, we found associations of type 2 diabetes with higher LV mass and concentric LV geometry. Effects of obesity and high BP did not completely account for higher LV mass and LV RWT in diabetics. Consideration of duration of hypertension or insulin resistance (HOMA) in addition to other covariates did not eliminated the association of diabetes with higher LV mass and RWT. Diabetic hypertensives had significantly lower stress-corrected MWS (myocardial systolic function) despite similar endocardial EFs versus nondiabetic hypertensives independent of age, sex, BMI, and afterload. Cardiovascular abnormalities found to be independently associated with diabetes in the present study are known to predict higher rates of cardiovascular events in both asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.16

Clinical and Laboratory Data
Diabetes is associated with hypertension.3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 However, in the present population, hypertension was unlikely to be consequence of type 2 diabetes, because mean age at diagnosis of hypertension was younger by 8 years than age at diagnosis of diabetes. Although diabetics were more likely to be on antihypertensive treatment, more frequently with >=2 medications, systolic BP and pulse pressure were greater in diabetic patients, a likely manifestation of greater arterial stiffness.42 Increase in systolic stress, by increased arterial stiffness, is a stimulus for LV wall thickening,43 thereby potentially contributing to higher LV wall thickness, whereas lower diastolic BP in diabetics probably negatively affects coronary perfusion.44 Diabetics had a worse lipid profile than nondiabetic subjects, which contributes to atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease.

As expected from previous studies,45 insulin resistance was positively associated with LV mass and was higher in non–insulin-treated diabetics than in nondiabetic hypertensives in the present study.

LV Geometry
Diabetic hypertensives had higher LV mass and concentric geometry independent of sex, age, obesity, BP, and duration of hypertension or insulin resistance (HOMA) in alternative models as a result of statistical collinearity of the latter variable with BMI. Those findings were confirmed after further consideration of major antihypertensive medication classes used. Notably, diabetics were more frequently black, which may be an important additional finding. However, race was not used as a covariate in multivariate models because of collinearity with other independent variables in the present population. In fact, an exploratory multiple linear regression analysis in which race was included in addition to standard covariates and diabetes resulted in a slightly lower multiple R (0.55) and low tolerance (0.79) for race.

Negative prognostic relevance of LV hypertrophy has been identified in clinical and population-based samples.16 29 30 31 32 Diabetics with LV hypertrophy had longer duration of diabetes and hypertension than those with normal LV mass. Likelihood of LV hypertrophy was 1.32-fold (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.70) higher in diabetic than nondiabetic hypertensives independent of most common clinically assessed conditions, such as sex, BP, and obesity. When duration of hypertension was further considered, relation of diabetes to LV hypertrophy became statistically insignificant, although a trend toward higher prevalence of LV hypertrophy in diabetic hypertensives was confirmed. Subjects with LV hypertrophy had longer duration of hypertension and a clear trend toward long duration of diabetes. These findings suggest that diabetes magnifies over time the alterations of the cardiovascular system induced by increased afterload of systemic hypertension and that the pathophysiological substrate for higher morbidity and mortality in diabetic subjects is multifactorial.

LV Systolic Function
Diabetic subjects, predominantly healthy due to exclusion of individuals with ischemic or valvular heart disease or renal failure, had lower myocardial systolic function than nondiabetic subjects independent of covariates. The concern that diabetes-associated atherosclerosis might affect noninvasive estimation of myocardial function in diabetics by reducing systolic BP augmentation between the central aorta (the BP to which the LV is exposed) and the cuff BP used to calculate end-systolic stress (which overestimates central BP in young individuals) is diminished by our finding in a separate population of 418 hypertensive adults that the difference between brachial and central systolic BP calculated by applanation tonometry was similar between diabetics and nondiabetics (12±7 versus 13±9; P=NS [M.J. Roman, R.B.D., personal communication, 2000). Low stress-corrected MWS is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic hypertensive patients with preserved EF,46 but its prognostic relevance in diabetic hypertensive individuals requires further study.

Clinical Implications
The present report identifies diabetes-associated increase in LV mass and RWT and decrease in LV midwall function, which may contribute in part to high rates of overt coronary heart disease and heart failure to which diabetic individuals are predisposed. Although abnormalities of LV geometry and myocardial function were mildly greater in diabetic than nondiabetic hypertensive patients, our results suggest that those differences may amplify over time. Our identification of a cluster of abnormalities of LV geometry and function with factors associated with diabetes supports multifactorial approach for preventing high rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetics.2 47 48


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grant 5-R01-HL55673 and cooperative agreement grants 5-U10-HL54471, HL-54472, HL-54473, HL-54496, HL-54509, and HL-54515 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md, and grant M-10RR0047-34 (GCRC) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. We thank the study center coordinators and the sonographers for expert performance of echocardiograms; Elizabeth A. Wood; Mary Paranicas, BA; and Dawn Fishman, BA, for design and maintenance of databases; and Virginia Burns for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Received May 30, 2000; revision received August 16, 2000; accepted August 16, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. 1. Kenny SJ, Aubert RE, Geiss LS. Prevalence and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes. In: Harris MI, Cowie CC, Stern MP, et al, eds. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1995:47–68. NIH publication 95-1468.

2. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2413–2446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham Study. Circulation. 1979;59:8–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Castelli WP. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Med. 1984;76(suppl 2A):4–12.

5. Pyorala K, Laakso M, Uusitupa M. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1987;3:463–524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Sprafka JM, Pankow J, McGovern PG, et al. Mortality among type 2 diabetic individuals and associated risk factors: the Three City Study. Diabet Med. 1993;10:627–632.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Kleinman JC, Donahue RP, Harris MI, et al. Mortality among diabetics in a national sample. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128:389–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Cause-specific mortality in population-based study of diabetes. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1158–1162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Teuscher A, Egger M, Herban JB. Diabetes and hypertension: blood pressure in clinical diabetes and a control population. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1942–1945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Kannel WB, Wilson PWF, Zhang TJ. The epidemiology of impaired glucose tolerance and hypertension. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1268–1273.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Krolewski AS, Warram JH, Valsania P, et al. Evolving natural history of coronary artery disease in diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1991;90:56S–61S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Lee M, Gardin JM, Lynch JC, et al. Diabetes mellitus and echocardiographic left ventricular function in free-living elderly men and women: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am Heart J. 1997;133:36–43.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Ashmed SS, Jaferi GA, Narang RM, et al. Preclinical abnormality of left ventricular function in diabetes mellitus. Am Heart J. 1975;89:153–158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Grossman E, Shemesh J, Shamiss A, et al. Left ventricular mass in diabetes-hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1001–1004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Galderisi M, Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, et al. Echocardiographic evidence for the existence of a distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy (the Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:85–89.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Devereux RB, Alderman MH. Role of preclinical cardiovascular disease in the evolution from risk factor exposure to development of morbid events. Circulation. 1993;88:1444–1455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Higgins M, Province M, Heiss G, et al. The NHLBI Family Heart Study: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:1219–1228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183–97.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Prevalence of insulin resistance in metabolic disorders: the Bruneck Study. Diabetes. 1998;47:1643–1649.[Abstract]

20. Devereux RB, Dahlöf B, Levy D, et al. Comparison of enalapril vs nifedipine to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension (The PRESERVE Trial). Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:61–65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Paranicas M, et al. Relations of Doppler stroke distance and aortic anular diameter to left ventricular stroke volume in normotensive and hypertensive American Indians: The Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:619–628.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, de Simone G, et al. Relations of left ventricular mass to demographic and hemodynamic variables in American Indians: The Strong Heart Study. Circulation. 1997;96:1416–1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Devereux RB, Roman MJ. Evaluation of cardiac and vascular structure by echocardiography and other noninvasive techniques. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995:1969–1985.

24. Sahn DJ, De Maria A, Kisslo J, et al. The Committee on M-mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978;58:1072–1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms: recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Shiina A, Tajik AJ, Smith HC, et al. Prognostic significance of regional wall motion abnormality in patients with prior myocardial infarction: a prospective correlative study of two-dimensional echocardiography and angiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61:254–262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Palmieri V, Dahlof B, DeQuattro V, et al. Reliability of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function: the PRESERVE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1625–1632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:450–458.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, et al. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:345–352.

30. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561–1566.[Abstract]

31. Ghali JK, Liao Y, Simmons B, et al. The prognostic role of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with or without coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:831–836.

32. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998;97:48–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Liu JE, Roman MJ, Pini R, et al. Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:564–572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, et al. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:7–11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Kronik G, Slany J, Mosslacher H. Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume: a correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. Circulation. 1979;60:1308–1316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Asanoi H, Sasayama S, Kameyama T. Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans. Circ Res. 1989;65:83–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by the mid-wall fractional shortening-end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1444–1451.[Abstract]

38. Municino AM, de Simone G, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by meridional and circumferential end-systolic stress/minor axis shortening relations in dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:544–549.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Gaasch WS, Zile MR, Hosino PK, et al. Stress-shortening relations and myocardial blood flow in compensated and failing canine hearts with pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 1989;79:872–873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Shimizu G, Hirota Y, Kita Y, et al. Left ventricular midwall mechanics in systemic arterial hypertension: myocardial function is depressed in pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 1991; 83:1676–1684.

41. Devereux RB, de Simone G, Pickering TG, et al. Relation of left ventricular midwall function to cardiovascular risk factors and arterial structure and function. Hypertension. 1998;31:929–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Liao D, Arnett DK, Tyroler HA, et al. Arterial stiffness and development of hypertension: the ARIC study. Hypertension. 1999;34:201–206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Saba PS, Roman MJ, Pini R, et al. Relation of arterial pressure waveform to left ventricular and carotid anatomy in normotensive subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1873–1880.[Abstract]

44. Cruikshank JM. Coronary flow reserve and the J curve relation between diastolic blood pressure and myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1988;297:1227–1230.

45. Sasson Z, Rasooly Y, Bhesania T, et al. Insulin resistance is an important determinant of left ventricular mass in the obese. Circulation. 1993;88:1431–1436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Koren MJ, et al. Midwall left ventricular mechanics: an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1996;93:259–265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703–713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351:1755–1762.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
V. Palmieri, C. Russo, A. Buonomo, E. A. Palmieri, and A. Celentano
Novel wall motion score-based method for estimating global left ventricular ejection fraction: validation by real-time 3D echocardiography and global longitudinal strain
Eur J Echocardiogr, November 21, 2009; (2009) jep177v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Vasan, S. Demissie, M. Kimura, L. A. Cupples, C. White, J. P. Gardner, X. Cao, D. Levy, E. J. Benjamin, and A. Aviv
Association of Leukocyte Telomere Length With Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass: The Framingham Heart Study
Circulation, September 29, 2009; 120(13): 1195 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
V. Barrios, C. Escobar, A. Calderon, R. Echarri, S. Barrios, and J. Navarro-Cid
Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy regression induced by an angiotensin receptor blocker-based regimen in hypertensive patients with diabetes: data from the SARA study
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2009; 10(3): 168 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Lieb, V. Xanthakis, L. M. Sullivan, J. Aragam, M. J. Pencina, M. G. Larson, E. J. Benjamin, and R. S. Vasan
Longitudinal Tracking of Left Ventricular Mass Over the Adult Life Course: Clinical Correlates of Short- and Long-Term Change in the Framingham Offspring Study
Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3085 - 3092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Ishikawa, S. Ishikawa, T. Kabutoya, T. Gotoh, K. Kayaba, J. E. Schwartz, T. G. Pickering, K. Shimada, K. Kario, and for the Jichi Medical School Cohort Study Investig
Cornell Product Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Electrocardiogram and the Risk of Stroke in a General Population
Hypertension, January 1, 2009; 53(1): 28 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. D. Abel, S. E. Litwin, and G. Sweeney
Cardiac Remodeling in Obesity
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 389 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, L. H. Lindholm, B. Dahlof, and for the LIFE Study Investigators
In-Treatment Resolution or Absence of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated With Decreased Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Hypertensive Patients: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study
Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 984 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. N. Bella, W. Tang, A. Kraja, D. C. Rao, S. C. Hunt, M. B. Miller, V. Palmieri, M. J. Roman, D. W. Kitzman, A. Oberman, et al.
Genome-Wide Linkage Mapping for Valve Calcification Susceptibility Loci in Hypertensive Sibships: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Galderisi
Diastolic Dysfunction and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Evaluation by Doppler Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1548 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
V. Palmieri, C. Russo, E. Arezzi, S. Pezzullo, M. Sabatella, S. Minichiello, and A. Celentano
Relations of longitudinal left ventricular systolic function to left ventricular mass, load, and Doppler stroke volume
Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2006; 7(5): 348 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Guazzi, S. Belletti, E. Bianco, L. Lenatti, and M. D. Guazzi
Endothelial dysfunction and exercise performance in lone atrial fibrillation or associated with hypertension or diabetes: different results with cardioversion
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H921 - H928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, F. Gemelli, D. Siepi, G. Vaudo, and E. Mannarino
Different Impact of the Metabolic Syndrome on Left Ventricular Structure and Function in Hypertensive Men and Women
Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 881 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, E. Gerdts, S. M. Snapinn, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, J. M. Edelman, L. H. Lindholm, et al.
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and the Prediction of Outcome During Antihypertensive Therapy: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension Study
Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1588 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
A. Sato, L. Tarnow, F.S. Nielsen, E. Knudsen, and H.-H. Parving
Left ventricular hypertrophy in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients not taking antihypertensive treatment
QJM, December 1, 2005; 98(12): 879 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. J. Rasmussen-Torvik, K. E. North, C. C. Gu, C. E. Lewis, J. B. Wilk, A. Chakravarti, Y.-P. C. Chang, M. B. Miller, N. Li, R. B. Devereux, et al.
A Population Association Study of Angiotensinogen Polymorphisms and Haplotypes With Left Ventricular Phenotypes
Hypertension, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 1294 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Burchfiel, T. N. Skelton, M. E. Andrew, R. J. Garrison, D. K. Arnett, D. W. Jones, and H. A. Taylor Jr
Metabolic Syndrome and Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass in Blacks: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 819 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. de Simone, D. W. Kitzman, M. Chinali, A. Oberman, P. N. Hopkins, D. C. Rao, D. K. Arnett, and R. B. Devereux
Left ventricular concentric geometry is associated with impaired relaxation in hypertension: the HyperGEN study
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 1039 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. de Simone, R. B Devereux, J. R Kizer, M. Chinali, J. N Bella, A. Oberman, D. W Kitzman, P. N Hopkins, D. Rao, and D. K Arnett
Body composition and fat distribution influence systemic hemodynamics in the absence of obesity: the HyperGEN Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2005; 81(4): 757 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Lindahl, J. Lindback, T. Jernberg, N. Johnston, M. Stridsberg, P. Venge, and L. Wallentin
Serial analyses of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A Fragmin and fast Revascularisation during InStability in coronary artery disease (FRISC)-II substudy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 15, 2005; 45(4): 533 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. B. Devereux, K. Wachtell, E. Gerdts, K. Boman, M. S. Nieminen, V. Papademetriou, J. Rokkedal, K. Harris, P. Aurup, and B. Dahlof
Prognostic Significance of Left Ventricular Mass Change During Treatment of Hypertension
JAMA, November 17, 2004; 292(19): 2350 - 2356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. B. Devereux, B. Dahlof, E. Gerdts, K. Boman, M. S. Nieminen, V. Papademetriou, J. Rokkedal, K. E. Harris, J. M. Edelman, and K. Wachtell
Regression of Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Compared With Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Trial
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1456 - 1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Magnusson, O. Melander, B. Israelsson, A. Grubb, L. Groop, and S. Jovinge
Elevated Plasma Levels of Nt-proBNP in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Without Overt Cardiovascular Disease
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2004; 27(8): 1929 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. R. Rinder, R. J. Spina, L. R. Peterson, C. J. Koenig, C. R. Florence, and A. A. Ehsani
Comparison of effects of exercise and diuretic on left ventricular geometry, mass, and insulin resistance in older hypertensive adults
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): R360 - R368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Klapholz, M. Maurer, A. M. Lowe, F. Messineo, J. S. Meisner, J. Mitchell, J. Kalman, R. A. Phillips, R. Steingart, E. J. Brown Jr, et al.
Hospitalization for heart failure in the presence of a normal left ventricular ejection fraction: Results of the New York heart failure registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1432 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. M.A. Henry, O. Kamp, P. J. Kostense, A. M.W. Spijkerman, J. M. Dekker, R. van Eijck, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, and C. D.A. Stehouwer
Left Ventricular Mass Increases With Deteriorating Glucose Tolerance, Especially in Women: Independence of Increased Arterial Stiffness or Decreased Flow-Mediated Dilation: The Hoorn Study
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 522 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
N. H. Andersen, S. H. Poulsen, K. Helleberg, P. Ivarsen, S. T. Knudsen, and C. E. Mogensen
Impact of Essential Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus on Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Performance
Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 306 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
V. Palmieri, R. P. Tracy, M. J. Roman, J. E. Liu, L. G. Best, J. N. Bella, D. C. Robbins, B. V. Howard, and R. B. Devereux
Relation of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy to Inflammation and Albuminuria in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: The Strong Heart Study
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2003; 26(10): 2764 - 2769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
L. Vaur, P. Gueret, M. Lievre, S. Chabaud, and P. Passa
Development of Congestive Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Microalbuminuria or Proteinuria: Observations from the DIABHYCAR (type 2 DIABetes, Hypertension, CArdiovascular Events and Ramipril) study
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 855 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. K. Rutter, H. Parise, E. J. Benjamin, D. Levy, M. G. Larson, J. B. Meigs, R. W. Nesto, P. W.F. Wilson, and R. S. Vasan
Impact of Glucose Intolerance and Insulin Resistance on Cardiac Structure and Function: Sex-Related Differences in the Framingham Heart Study
Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 448 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. Palmieri, P. M. Okin, J. N. Bella, E. Gerdts, K. Wachtell, J. Gardin, V. Papademetriou, M. S. Nieminen, B. Dahlof, and R. B. Devereux
Echocardiographic Wall Motion Abnormalities in Hypertensive Patients With Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study
Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. D. Solomon, M. S. J. Sutton, G. A. Lamas, T. Plappert, J. L. Rouleau, H. Skali, L. Moye, E. Braunwald, M. A. Pfeffer, and for the Survival And Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE
Ventricular Remodeling Does Not Accompany the Development of Heart Failure in Diabetic Patients After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, September 3, 2002; 106(10): 1251 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. Tang, D. K. Arnett, R. B. Devereux, M. A. Province, L. D. Atwood, A. Oberman, P. N. Hopkins, and D. W. Kitzman
Sibling Resemblance for Left Ventricular Structure, Contractility, and Diastolic Filling
Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 233 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. O. Bonow, W. E. Mitch, R. W. Nesto, P. T. O'Gara, R. C. Becker, L. T. Clark, S. Hunt, I. Jialal, S. E. Lipshultz, and E. Loh
Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Writing Group V: Management of Cardiovascular-Renal Complications
Circulation, May 7, 2002; 105 (18): e159 - e164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.W. Serruys
ARTS I--the rapamycin eluting stent; ARTS II--the rosy prophecy
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2002; 23(10): 757 - 759.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. B. Devereux, J. N. Bella, V. Palmieri, A. Oberman, D. W. Kitzman, P. N. Hopkins, D.C. Rao, D. Morgan, M. Paranicas, D. Fishman, et al.
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in a Biracial Sample of Hypertensive Adults: The HyperGEN Study
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 417 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. N. Bella, V. Palmieri, J. E. Liu, D. W. Kitzman, A. Oberman, S. C. Hunt, P. N. Hopkins, D.C. Rao, D. K. Arnett, and R. B. Devereux
Relationship Between Left Ventricular Diastolic Relaxation and Systolic Function in Hypertension: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 424 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmieri, V.
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palmieri, V.
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, R. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Echocardiography