| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:102.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Weill Medical College of Cornell University (V.P., J.N.B., J.E.L., M.-Y.S., R.B.D.), New York, NY; University of Minnesota (D.K.A.), Minneapolis, Minn; University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.O.), Birmingham, Ala; Wake Forest University School of Medicine (D.W.K.), Winston-Salem, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (P.N.H.), Salt Lake City, Utah; and Washington University Medical School (D.M., D.C.R.), St. Louis, Mo.
Correspondence to Vittorio Palmieri, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Division of Cardiology (Box 222), 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail: vpalmier{at}med.cornell.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsAmong 1950 hypertensive participants in the HyperGEN Study without overt coronary heart disease or significant valve disease, 20% (n=386) had diabetes. Diabetics were more likely to be women, black, older, and have higher BMI and waist/hip ratio than were nondiabetics. After adjustment for age and sex, diabetics had higher systolic BP, pulse pressure, and heart rate; lower diastolic BP; and longer duration of hypertension than nondiabetics. LV mass and relative wall thickness were higher in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects independent of covariates. Compared with nondiabetic hypertensives, diabetics had lower stress-corrected midwall shortening, independent of covariates, without difference in LV EF. Insulin levels and insulin resistance were higher in noninsulin-treated diabetics (n=195) than nondiabetic (n=1439) subjects (both P<0.01). Insulin resistance positively but weakly related to LV mass and relative wall thickness.
ConclusionsIn a relatively healthy, population-based sample of hypertensive adults, type 2 diabetes was associated with higher LV mass, more concentric LV geometry, and lower myocardial function, independent of age, sex, body size, and arterial BP. structural and functional abnormalities in addition to, and independent of, atherosclerosis.13 14 In the Framingham cohort, diabetes was associated with higher LV mass in women but not men.15 High blood pressure (BP), obesity, and abnormal lipid profile, which often coexist with diabetes, tend to be associated with preclinical cardiovascular abnormalities16 and may contribute to the association of diabetes with cardiovascular events. Cardiac features of diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive subjects remain incompletely described in population-based samples. Therefore, we compared clinical and metabolic characteristics, LV geometry, and systolic function between diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive participants in the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
140 mm Hg systolic and/or
90 mm Hg diastolic on
2 occasions. To
be eligible, hypertensive subjects were required to have onset of
hypertension by age 60 years and
1 hypertensive sibling who was
willing to participate. Individuals with type I diabetes were excluded
because of high risk of hypertension due to nephropathy. Four of 5
field centers in HyperGEN participated in the ancillary
echocardiographic study. Study participants were recruited from
existing populations previously defined, including the Atherosclerosis
Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (Minneapolis and Forsyth County, North
Carolina), the Minnesota Heart Study, and the Utah Healthy Family Tree
Study. Selected participants from these parent studies previously
participated in the NHLBI Family Heart
Study,17 from which a large
proportion of the hypertensive sibships were sampled for HyperGEN. Many
of the Birmingham patients (all black) were selected from the
community. The target population was 50% each black and white in
Winston-Salem and 100% white in Minnesota and Utah.
The first HyperGEN examination began in 1996 to obtain
standardized measurements of BP at rest and its reactivity to several
stimuli. Standardized anthropometric measurements included body mass
index (BMI), body surface area, and waist/hip ratio. Fasting serum
glucose, insulin, and lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were
obtained. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by American Diabetes
Association criteria18
(fasting glucose
126 mg/dL or use of hypoglycemic medication).
Insulin levels were assessed by immunoassay (Sanofi Access; reference
range, 1.9 to 23 µU/mL). Insulin resistance was calculated by use of
the previously validated homeostasis model assessment
(HOMA).19 Myocardial
infarction, coronary bypass, and percutaneous coronary angioplasty were
identified by participant reports. Type and number of antihypertensive
medications used were recorded at clinical evaluation.
Clinical and echocardiographic information was available for
2161 hypertensive subjects. We excluded subjects without technically
satisfactory LV measurements (3.1% of the cohort) or with
2+ aortic
or mitral disease; dialysis treatment; history of myocardial
infarction, coronary bypass, or percutaneous coronary angioplasty; or
severe hypokinesis, akinesis, or dyskinesis on
echocardiogram.
Echocardiographic Methods
Echocardiograms were performed by use of methods
previously
described.20 21 22
A standardized protocol was followed, under which parasternal and
apical acoustic windows were used to record
10 consecutive beats per
each projection. All elements of the protocol were recorded on
videotape; additional strip-chart recordings were made in 1 center.
Principal sonographers received training, including written material
and didactic and hands-on training at the Reading Center in New York
City, NY. Additionally, test tapes were sent to each center as
part of sonographer training, and feedback on echocardiographic studies
was provided to monitor compliance with the protocol. Parasternal
long-axis and apical views were used to detect valvular regurgitation
by color Doppler.
Echocardiographic Measurements
Correct orientation of planes for imaging and Doppler
recordings was verified with standard
procedures.23 LV internal
dimension and interventricular septal and posterior wall thicknesses
were measured at end-diastole and end-systole by American Society of
Echocardiography
recommendations24 on
3
cardiac cycles at or just below the tips of mitral leaflets in
parasternal long-axis and short-axis views. When optimal orientation of
LV M-mode readings could not be obtained, correctly oriented linear
2-dimensional measurements were made by use of the American Society of
Echocardiography leading-edge
convention.25 Wall motion
was assessed in parasternal long-axis and short-axis views and apical
2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views, with the LV divided into 5 segments at the
base, 5 at the papillary muscles, and 4 at the
apex.26 Echocardiograms were
preliminarily read by a first reader and subsequently reread by highly
experienced readers. All readers were blinded to subjects clinical
data. We reported excellent reliability of LV mass measurement
(intraclass correlation coefficient=0.93) and good reliability of LV
systolic function assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.61
to 0.71) in a previous
study,27 in which an
echocardiographic methodology similar to that used in this study was
employed.
Calculation of Derived Variables
End-diastolic LV dimensions were used to calculate LV
mass by a formula that yields values closely related
(r=0.90) to necropsy LV
weight28 and has proven
valuable for cardiovascular risk
stratification.29 30 31 32
LV mass was indexed by height2.7 to identify
LV hypertrophy with partition values of
46.7g/m2.7 in women and
49.2g/m2.7 in
men.33 Relative wall
thickness (RWT), an estimate of LV geometric concentricity, was
calculated as twice posterior wall thickness divided by internal
dimension. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes were calculated by
the Teichholz method,34
which uses linear measurements of LV internal diastolic and systolic
diameters, as has been validated by invasive and Doppler reference
standards.21 35 36
Linear-measurementderived ejection fraction (EF) was calculated as
the percentage reduction of LV volume from diastole to end-systole. To
estimate global LVEF, accounting for the contribution of each LV
segment to systolic reduction of LV volume, we assigned a score of 4.5
to each segment with normal wall motion (which yielded global EF of
63%); scores of 3.5, 2.5, and 1.5 to mildly, moderately, and severely
hypokinetic segments, respectively; 0 to akinetic; and -1 to dyskinetic
segments.
Measures of Myocardial Function
Studies have documented that the traditional practice
of relating endocardial shortening to mean meridional end-systolic
stress across the LV wall may yield misleading results in individuals
with concentric LV
geometry37 or LV
dilatation.38 Therefore,
primary reliance was placed on the relation of midwall shortening (MWS)
to midwall circumferential end-systolic stress (cESS) at the level of
the LV minor
axis.37 39 40 41
MWS was calculated by taking into account epicardial migration of the
midwall during systole. Estimates of end-systolic stress by the
described method were closely related to values calculated by
substituting central BP estimated by applanation tonometry for cuff BP
(r=0.95).37
In another sample of 418 hypertensive adults with or without diabetes,
cuff systolic BP correlated closely to central BP estimated by
tonometry (r=0.93), and the
difference between brachial and central aortic systolic BP did not
differ between diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensives (12±7 versus
13±9 mm Hg, respectively;
P=0.9; M.J. Roman and R.B.D.,
personal communication, 2000). To evaluate LV performance while
taking cESS into account, shortening calculated from echocardiographic
measurements was expressed as a percentage of value predicted from cESS
with equations from previously studied normal
subjects37 and called
"stress-corrected MWS," a measure of myocardial systolic
function.41
Statistical Analyses
Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD.
Unadjusted differences for clinical variables between diabetic and
nondiabetic subjects were assessed by
t test. Difference in
laboratory data and LV systolic function were adjusted for age and sex
by use of ANCOVA. Differences in LV structure and geometry were
adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and systolic BP as their major established
covariates,22 with further
adjustment for duration of hypertension. Fishers Exact Test and odds
ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to test differences for
categorical variables in 2x2 tables. Logistic regression analysis was
used to derived odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for
covariates. Multiple regression analyses were performed to assess
relation of diabetes to higher LV mass independent of established
covariates and duration of hypertension. Two-tailed
P<0.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical and Metabolic Features of Diabetic and
Nondiabetic Hypertensive Subjects
Subjects with diabetes were older; had higher BMI,
waist/hip ratio, systolic BP, pulse pressure, and heart rate; had lower
diastolic BP; and were slightly more likely to be female than subjects
without diabetes
Table 1
. The proportion of subjects who had smoked
>100 cigarettes was similar between the groups, as was age at
diagnosis of hypertension. Duration of hypertension was longer among
diabetics (19±12 versus 14±11 years;
P<0.001). Diabetic patients
more frequently were on antihypertensive treatment than nondiabetics
(94% versus 89%; P<0.01) and
more frequently received ACE inhibitors (48% versus 27%;
P<0.01), whereas no
between-group differences were seen in ß-blocker (16% versus 20%),
calcium channel blocker (45% versus 37%), or diuretic (50% versus
47%) use (all P=NS). Diabetics
were more frequently on
2 medications than nondiabetics (47% versus
34%; P<0.01), which yielded,
on average, a higher number of antihypertensive medications in
diabetics than nondiabetics (1.6 [range, 0 to 6] versus 1.3 [range,
0 to 5];
P<0.001).
|
Laboratory Data
After adjustments were made for age and sex, diabetic
patients had higher fasting plasma glucose, triglyceride, and
creatinine levels
(Table 2
). Total cholesterol did not differ between groups,
but HDL cholesterol was lower and total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol and
triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratios were higher in diabetics. Insulin
(11.2 versus 9.7 µU/mL) and HOMA (4.5 versus 2.5) levels were higher
in noninsulin-treated diabetics (n=195) than nondiabetic (n=1439)
subjects (both
P<0.01).
|
LV Mass and Geometry
Subjects with diabetes had higher LV wall thicknesses,
mass, and RWT than those without diabetes independent of age, systolic
BP, BMI, and sex, with no between-group difference in LV internal
diameter
(Table 3
). After additional consideration of duration of
hypertension as covariate, between-group differences in LV mass (178
versus 173 g) and RWT (0.36 versus 0.35) were confirmed (both
P<0.05). LV mass (178 versus
172 g) and RWT (0.36 versus 0.35, both
P<0.01) remained higher in
diabetics after further adjustment for variables that indicated major
antihypertensive medication classes. Likelihood of LV hypertrophy was
higher in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects (38% versus 26%,
P=0.03; systolic BP and BMI
adjusted-odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.70), but the difference
did not reach statistical significance when duration of hypertension
was included in the previous model (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6).
Subjects with LV hypertrophy versus those without had longer duration
of hypertension (18±12 versus 14±11 years;
P<0.01) and tended toward
longer duration of diabetes (11±10 versus 9±9 years;
P=0.055). A multiple linear
regression model showed significant association of diabetes with higher
LV mass (t=2.2, slope=5.9;
P=0.02) independent of
established covariates and duration of hypertension
(R=0.56;
P<0.001). Bivariate relations
of HOMA to LV mass (r=0.08;
P<0.01) and RWT
(r=0.19;
P<0.001) were relatively weak
and became weaker after adjustment for covariates
(r=0.003,
P=NS to LV mass;
r=0.06,
P=0.02 to RWT). Among subjects
not treated with insulin, a regression model that included HOMA instead
of BMI showed association of diabetes with LV mass
(t=3.6, slope 3.9;
P<0.001) independent of
covariates (R=0.46;
P<0.001).
|
Myocardial Function and LV Chamber Systolic
Performance
Diabetics had similar EF (either from LV linear
dimension or from wall motion score) but lower MWS than did
nondiabetics independent of age, sex, and BMI
(Table 4
). cESS, a measure of afterload, was higher in
diabetics. Stress-corrected MWS was lower in diabetic subjects
independent of covariates and variables that indicated major
antihypertensive medication classes (104% versus 106%;
P<0.05).
|
LV Structure and Function in Diabetic Subjects
Divided According to Antidiabetic Treatment
Insulin-treated subjects (n=175) did not differ from
those not receiving insulin (n=211) in age (both mean of 57 years) or
proportion of women (69% versus 64%). Blacks more commonly received
insulin (83% versus 67%;
P<0.0005). Systolic BP was
higher in insulin-treated diabetics (141±25 versus 133±22 mm Hg;
P<0.01) as was fasting glucose
(180±80 versus 155±61 mg/dL;
P<0.01). Diastolic BP (both
72±11 mm Hg) and BMI (34.5±7.5 versus 33.1±6.7
kg/m2) did not differ. LV mass (184±42
versus 181±42 g; P>0.1) and
EF (62.4% versus 62.9%;
P>0.5) were similar in
insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetics. RWT was higher
(0.37±0.05 versus 0.36±0.05;
P<0.05) and stress-corrected
MWS was lower in diabetics who received insulin (102±10% versus
105±10%, P<0.01) independent
of covariates.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical and Laboratory Data
Diabetes is associated with
hypertension.3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
However, in the present population, hypertension was unlikely to be
consequence of type 2 diabetes, because mean age at diagnosis of
hypertension was younger by 8 years than age at diagnosis of diabetes.
Although diabetics were more likely to be on antihypertensive
treatment, more frequently with
2 medications, systolic BP and pulse
pressure were greater in diabetic patients, a likely manifestation of
greater arterial
stiffness.42 Increase in
systolic stress, by increased arterial stiffness, is a stimulus for LV
wall thickening,43 thereby
potentially contributing to higher LV wall thickness, whereas lower
diastolic BP in diabetics probably negatively affects coronary
perfusion.44 Diabetics had a
worse lipid profile than nondiabetic subjects, which contributes to
atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease.
As expected from previous studies,45 insulin resistance was positively associated with LV mass and was higher in noninsulin-treated diabetics than in nondiabetic hypertensives in the present study.
LV Geometry
Diabetic hypertensives had higher LV mass and
concentric geometry independent of sex, age, obesity, BP, and duration
of hypertension or insulin resistance (HOMA) in alternative models as a
result of statistical collinearity of the latter variable with BMI.
Those findings were confirmed after further consideration of major
antihypertensive medication classes used. Notably, diabetics were more
frequently black, which may be an important additional finding.
However, race was not used as a covariate in multivariate models
because of collinearity with other independent variables in the present
population. In fact, an exploratory multiple linear regression analysis
in which race was included in addition to standard covariates and
diabetes resulted in a slightly lower multiple
R (0.55) and low tolerance
(0.79) for race.
Negative prognostic relevance of LV hypertrophy has been identified in clinical and population-based samples.16 29 30 31 32 Diabetics with LV hypertrophy had longer duration of diabetes and hypertension than those with normal LV mass. Likelihood of LV hypertrophy was 1.32-fold (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.70) higher in diabetic than nondiabetic hypertensives independent of most common clinically assessed conditions, such as sex, BP, and obesity. When duration of hypertension was further considered, relation of diabetes to LV hypertrophy became statistically insignificant, although a trend toward higher prevalence of LV hypertrophy in diabetic hypertensives was confirmed. Subjects with LV hypertrophy had longer duration of hypertension and a clear trend toward long duration of diabetes. These findings suggest that diabetes magnifies over time the alterations of the cardiovascular system induced by increased afterload of systemic hypertension and that the pathophysiological substrate for higher morbidity and mortality in diabetic subjects is multifactorial.
LV Systolic Function
Diabetic subjects, predominantly healthy due to
exclusion of individuals with ischemic or valvular heart disease or
renal failure, had lower myocardial systolic function than nondiabetic
subjects independent of covariates. The concern that
diabetes-associated atherosclerosis might affect noninvasive estimation
of myocardial function in diabetics by reducing systolic BP
augmentation between the central aorta (the BP to which the LV is
exposed) and the cuff BP used to calculate end-systolic stress (which
overestimates central BP in young individuals) is diminished by our
finding in a separate population of 418 hypertensive adults that the
difference between brachial and central systolic BP calculated by
applanation tonometry was similar between diabetics and nondiabetics
(12±7 versus 13±9; P=NS
[M.J. Roman, R.B.D., personal communication, 2000). Low
stress-corrected MWS is an independent predictor of cardiovascular
events in asymptomatic hypertensive patients with preserved
EF,46 but its prognostic
relevance in diabetic hypertensive individuals requires further
study.
Clinical Implications
The present report identifies diabetes-associated
increase in LV mass and RWT and decrease in LV midwall function, which
may contribute in part to high rates of overt coronary heart disease
and heart failure to which diabetic individuals are predisposed.
Although abnormalities of LV geometry and myocardial function were
mildly greater in diabetic than nondiabetic hypertensive patients, our
results suggest that those differences may amplify over time. Our
identification of a cluster of abnormalities of LV geometry and
function with factors associated with diabetes supports multifactorial
approach for preventing high rates of cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality in type 2
diabetics.2 47 48
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 30, 2000; revision received August 16, 2000; accepted August 16, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
The Sixth Report of
the Joint National Committee on prevention, evaluation, and treatment
of high blood pressure. Arch Intern
Med. 1997;157:24132446.
3.
Kannel WB, McGee
DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham Study.
Circulation. 1979;59:813.
4. Castelli WP. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Med. 1984;76(suppl 2A):412.
5. Pyorala K, Laakso M, Uusitupa M. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1987;3:463524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Sprafka JM, Pankow J, McGovern PG, et al. Mortality among type 2 diabetic individuals and associated risk factors: the Three City Study. Diabet Med. 1993;10:627632.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Kleinman JC,
Donahue RP, Harris MI, et al. Mortality among diabetics in a national
sample. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128:389401.
8.
Moss SE, Klein R,
Klein BE. Cause-specific mortality in population-based study of
diabetes. Am J Public
Health. 1991;81:11581162.
9.
Teuscher A, Egger
M, Herban JB. Diabetes and hypertension: blood pressure in clinical
diabetes and a control population. Arch
Intern Med. 1989;149:19421945.
10. Kannel WB, Wilson PWF, Zhang TJ. The epidemiology of impaired glucose tolerance and hypertension. Am Heart J. 1991;121:12681273.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Krolewski AS, Warram JH, Valsania P, et al. Evolving natural history of coronary artery disease in diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1991;90:56S61S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lee M, Gardin JM, Lynch JC, et al. Diabetes mellitus and echocardiographic left ventricular function in free-living elderly men and women: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am Heart J. 1997;133:3643.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Ashmed SS, Jaferi GA, Narang RM, et al. Preclinical abnormality of left ventricular function in diabetes mellitus. Am Heart J. 1975;89:153158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Grossman E,
Shemesh J, Shamiss A, et al. Left ventricular mass in
diabetes-hypertension. Arch Intern
Med. 1992;152:10011004.
15. Galderisi M, Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, et al. Echocardiographic evidence for the existence of a distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy (the Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:8589.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Devereux RB,
Alderman MH. Role of preclinical cardiovascular disease in the
evolution from risk factor exposure to development of morbid events.
Circulation. 1993;88:14441455.
17.
Higgins M,
Province M, Heiss G, et al. The NHLBI Family Heart Study: objectives
and design. Am J
Epidemiol. 1996;143:12191228.
18. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:118397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Prevalence of insulin resistance in metabolic disorders: the Bruneck Study. Diabetes. 1998;47:16431649.[Abstract]
20. Devereux RB, Dahlöf B, Levy D, et al. Comparison of enalapril vs nifedipine to decrease left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension (The PRESERVE Trial). Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:6165.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Paranicas M, et al. Relations of Doppler stroke distance and aortic anular diameter to left ventricular stroke volume in normotensive and hypertensive American Indians: The Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:619628.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Devereux RB,
Roman MJ, de Simone G, et al. Relations of left ventricular mass to
demographic and hemodynamic variables in American Indians: The Strong
Heart Study. Circulation. 1997;96:14161423.
23. Devereux RB, Roman MJ. Evaluation of cardiac and vascular structure by echocardiography and other noninvasive techniques. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995:19691985.
24.
Sahn DJ, De Maria
A, Kisslo J, et al. The Committee on M-mode Standardization of the
American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations regarding
quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of
echocardiographic measurements.
Circulation. 1978;58:10721083.
25. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms: recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Shiina A, Tajik AJ, Smith HC, et al. Prognostic significance of regional wall motion abnormality in patients with prior myocardial infarction: a prospective correlative study of two-dimensional echocardiography and angiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61:254262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Palmieri V,
Dahlof B, DeQuattro V, et al. Reliability of echocardiographic
assessment of left ventricular structure and function: the PRESERVE
study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:16251632.
28. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:450458.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, et al. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:345352.
30. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:15611566.[Abstract]
31. Ghali JK, Liao Y, Simmons B, et al. The prognostic role of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with or without coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:831836.
32.
Verdecchia P,
Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic significance of serial
changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.
Circulation. 1998;97:4854.
33.
Liu JE, Roman MJ,
Pini R, et al. Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with
elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure.
Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:564572.
34. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, et al. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:711.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Kronik G, Slany
J, Mosslacher H. Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic
formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume: a correlative
study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane
cineangiography. Circulation. 1979;60:13081316.
36.
Asanoi H,
Sasayama S, Kameyama T. Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and
failing heart in humans. Circ
Res. 1989;65:8393.
37. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by the mid-wall fractional shortening-end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:14441451.[Abstract]
38. Municino AM, de Simone G, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by meridional and circumferential end-systolic stress/minor axis shortening relations in dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:544549.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Gaasch WS, Zile
MR, Hosino PK, et al. Stress-shortening relations and myocardial blood
flow in compensated and failing canine hearts with pressure-overload
hypertrophy. Circulation. 1989;79:872873.
40. Shimizu G, Hirota Y, Kita Y, et al. Left ventricular midwall mechanics in systemic arterial hypertension: myocardial function is depressed in pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 1991; 83:16761684.
41.
Devereux RB, de
Simone G, Pickering TG, et al. Relation of left ventricular midwall
function to cardiovascular risk factors and arterial structure and
function. Hypertension. 1998;31:929936.
42.
Liao D, Arnett
DK, Tyroler HA, et al. Arterial stiffness and development of
hypertension: the ARIC study.
Hypertension. 1999;34:201206.
43. Saba PS, Roman MJ, Pini R, et al. Relation of arterial pressure waveform to left ventricular and carotid anatomy in normotensive subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:18731880.[Abstract]
44. Cruikshank JM. Coronary flow reserve and the J curve relation between diastolic blood pressure and myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1988;297:12271230.
45.
Sasson Z, Rasooly
Y, Bhesania T, et al. Insulin resistance is an important determinant of
left ventricular mass in the obese.
Circulation. 1993;88:14311436.
46.
de Simone G,
Devereux RB, Koren MJ, et al. Midwall left ventricular mechanics: an
independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension.
Circulation. 1996;93:259265.
47.
UK Prospective
Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of
macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS
38. BMJ. 1998;317:703713.
48. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351:17551762.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Palmieri, C. Russo, A. Buonomo, E. A. Palmieri, and A. Celentano Novel wall motion score-based method for estimating global left ventricular ejection fraction: validation by real-time 3D echocardiography and global longitudinal strain Eur J Echocardiogr, November 21, 2009; (2009) jep177v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Vasan, S. Demissie, M. Kimura, L. A. Cupples, C. White, J. P. Gardner, X. Cao, D. Levy, E. J. Benjamin, and A. Aviv Association of Leukocyte Telomere Length With Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, September 29, 2009; 120(13): 1195 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Barrios, C. Escobar, A. Calderon, R. Echarri, S. Barrios, and J. Navarro-Cid Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy regression induced by an angiotensin receptor blocker-based regimen in hypertensive patients with diabetes: data from the SARA study Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2009; 10(3): 168 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lieb, V. Xanthakis, L. M. Sullivan, J. Aragam, M. J. Pencina, M. G. Larson, E. J. Benjamin, and R. S. Vasan Longitudinal Tracking of Left Ventricular Mass Over the Adult Life Course: Clinical Correlates of Short- and Long-Term Change in the Framingham Offspring Study Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3085 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ishikawa, S. Ishikawa, T. Kabutoya, T. Gotoh, K. Kayaba, J. E. Schwartz, T. G. Pickering, K. Shimada, K. Kario, and for the Jichi Medical School Cohort Study Investig Cornell Product Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Electrocardiogram and the Risk of Stroke in a General Population Hypertension, January 1, 2009; 53(1): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Abel, S. E. Litwin, and G. Sweeney Cardiac Remodeling in Obesity Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 389 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, L. H. Lindholm, B. Dahlof, and for the LIFE Study Investigators In-Treatment Resolution or Absence of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated With Decreased Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Hypertensive Patients: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 984 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Bella, W. Tang, A. Kraja, D. C. Rao, S. C. Hunt, M. B. Miller, V. Palmieri, M. J. Roman, D. W. Kitzman, A. Oberman, et al. Genome-Wide Linkage Mapping for Valve Calcification Susceptibility Loci in Hypertensive Sibships: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 453 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Galderisi Diastolic Dysfunction and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Evaluation by Doppler Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1548 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Palmieri, C. Russo, E. Arezzi, S. Pezzullo, M. Sabatella, S. Minichiello, and A. Celentano Relations of longitudinal left ventricular systolic function to left ventricular mass, load, and Doppler stroke volume Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2006; 7(5): 348 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Guazzi, S. Belletti, E. Bianco, L. Lenatti, and M. D. Guazzi Endothelial dysfunction and exercise performance in lone atrial fibrillation or associated with hypertension or diabetes: different results with cardioversion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H921 - H928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, F. Gemelli, D. Siepi, G. Vaudo, and E. Mannarino Different Impact of the Metabolic Syndrome on Left Ventricular Structure and Function in Hypertensive Men and Women Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 881 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, E. Gerdts, S. M. Snapinn, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, J. M. Edelman, L. H. Lindholm, et al. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and the Prediction of Outcome During Antihypertensive Therapy: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension Study Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1588 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sato, L. Tarnow, F.S. Nielsen, E. Knudsen, and H.-H. Parving Left ventricular hypertrophy in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients not taking antihypertensive treatment QJM, December 1, 2005; 98(12): 879 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Rasmussen-Torvik, K. E. North, C. C. Gu, C. E. Lewis, J. B. Wilk, A. Chakravarti, Y.-P. C. Chang, M. B. Miller, N. Li, R. B. Devereux, et al. A Population Association Study of Angiotensinogen Polymorphisms and Haplotypes With Left Ventricular Phenotypes Hypertension, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 1294 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Burchfiel, T. N. Skelton, M. E. Andrew, R. J. Garrison, D. K. Arnett, D. W. Jones, and H. A. Taylor Jr Metabolic Syndrome and Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass in Blacks: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 819 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. de Simone, D. W. Kitzman, M. Chinali, A. Oberman, P. N. Hopkins, D. C. Rao, D. K. Arnett, and R. B. Devereux Left ventricular concentric geometry is associated with impaired relaxation in hypertension: the HyperGEN study Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 1039 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. de Simone, R. B Devereux, J. R Kizer, M. Chinali, J. N Bella, A. Oberman, D. W Kitzman, P. N Hopkins, D. Rao, and D. K Arnett Body composition and fat distribution influence systemic hemodynamics in the absence of obesity: the HyperGEN Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2005; 81(4): 757 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lindahl, J. Lindback, T. Jernberg, N. Johnston, M. Stridsberg, P. Venge, and L. Wallentin Serial analyses of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A Fragmin and fast Revascularisation during InStability in coronary artery disease (FRISC)-II substudy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 15, 2005; 45(4): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Devereux, K. Wachtell, E. Gerdts, K. Boman, M. S. Nieminen, V. Papademetriou, J. Rokkedal, K. Harris, P. Aurup, and B. Dahlof Prognostic Significance of Left Ventricular Mass Change During Treatment of Hypertension JAMA, November 17, 2004; 292(19): 2350 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Devereux, B. Dahlof, E. Gerdts, K. Boman, M. S. Nieminen, V. Papademetriou, J. Rokkedal, K. E. Harris, J. M. Edelman, and K. Wachtell Regression of Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Compared With Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Trial Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1456 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Magnusson, O. Melander, B. Israelsson, A. Grubb, L. Groop, and S. Jovinge Elevated Plasma Levels of Nt-proBNP in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Without Overt Cardiovascular Disease Diabetes Care, August 1, 2004; 27(8): 1929 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Rinder, R. J. Spina, L. R. Peterson, C. J. Koenig, C. R. Florence, and A. A. Ehsani Comparison of effects of exercise and diuretic on left ventricular geometry, mass, and insulin resistance in older hypertensive adults Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): R360 - R368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Klapholz, M. Maurer, A. M. Lowe, F. Messineo, J. S. Meisner, J. Mitchell, J. Kalman, R. A. Phillips, R. Steingart, E. J. Brown Jr, et al. Hospitalization for heart failure in the presence of a normal left ventricular ejection fraction: Results of the New York heart failure registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1432 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M.A. Henry, O. Kamp, P. J. Kostense, A. M.W. Spijkerman, J. M. Dekker, R. van Eijck, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Left Ventricular Mass Increases With Deteriorating Glucose Tolerance, Especially in Women: Independence of Increased Arterial Stiffness or Decreased Flow-Mediated Dilation: The Hoorn Study Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 522 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Andersen, S. H. Poulsen, K. Helleberg, P. Ivarsen, S. T. Knudsen, and C. E. Mogensen Impact of Essential Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus on Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Performance Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Palmieri, R. P. Tracy, M. J. Roman, J. E. Liu, L. G. Best, J. N. Bella, D. C. Robbins, B. V. Howard, and R. B. Devereux Relation of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy to Inflammation and Albuminuria in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: The Strong Heart Study Diabetes Care, October 1, 2003; 26(10): 2764 - 2769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Vaur, P. Gueret, M. Lievre, S. Chabaud, and P. Passa Development of Congestive Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Microalbuminuria or Proteinuria: Observations from the DIABHYCAR (type 2 DIABetes, Hypertension, CArdiovascular Events and Ramipril) study Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 855 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Rutter, H. Parise, E. J. Benjamin, D. Levy, M. G. Larson, J. B. Meigs, R. W. Nesto, P. W.F. Wilson, and R. S. Vasan Impact of Glucose Intolerance and Insulin Resistance on Cardiac Structure and Function: Sex-Related Differences in the Framingham Heart Study Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 448 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Palmieri, P. M. Okin, J. N. Bella, E. Gerdts, K. Wachtell, J. Gardin, V. Papademetriou, M. S. Nieminen, B. Dahlof, and R. B. Devereux Echocardiographic Wall Motion Abnormalities in Hypertensive Patients With Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Solomon, M. S. J. Sutton, G. A. Lamas, T. Plappert, J. L. Rouleau, H. Skali, L. Moye, E. Braunwald, M. A. Pfeffer, and for the Survival And Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE Ventricular Remodeling Does Not Accompany the Development of Heart Failure in Diabetic Patients After Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 3, 2002; 106(10): 1251 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Tang, D. K. Arnett, R. B. Devereux, M. A. Province, L. D. Atwood, A. Oberman, P. N. Hopkins, and D. W. Kitzman Sibling Resemblance for Left Ventricular Structure, Contractility, and Diastolic Filling Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 233 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Bonow, W. E. Mitch, R. W. Nesto, P. T. O'Gara, R. C. Becker, L. T. Clark, S. Hunt, I. Jialal, S. E. Lipshultz, and E. Loh Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Writing Group V: Management of Cardiovascular-Renal Complications Circulation, May 7, 2002; 105 (18): e159 - e164. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.W. Serruys ARTS I--the rapamycin eluting stent; ARTS II--the rosy prophecy Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2002; 23(10): 757 - 759. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Devereux, J. N. Bella, V. Palmieri, A. Oberman, D. W. Kitzman, P. N. Hopkins, D.C. Rao, D. Morgan, M. Paranicas, D. Fishman, et al. Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in a Biracial Sample of Hypertensive Adults: The HyperGEN Study Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 417 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Bella, V. Palmieri, J. E. Liu, D. W. Kitzman, A. Oberman, S. C. Hunt, P. N. Hopkins, D.C. Rao, D. K. Arnett, and R. B. Devereux Relationship Between Left Ventricular Diastolic Relaxation and Systolic Function in Hypertension: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 424 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |