Circulation. 2000;102:III-346-III-351
(Circulation. 2000;102:III-346.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Myocardial Protection and Vascular Biology |
Myocardial Protection by Preconditioning of Heart With Losartan, an Angiotensin II Type 1Receptor Blocker
Implication of Bradykinin-Dependent and Bradykinin-Independent Mechanisms
Motoaki Sato, MD;
Richard M. Engelman, MD;
Hajime Otani, MD;
Nilanjana Maulik, PhD;
John A. Rousou, MD;
Joseph E. Flack, III, MD;
David W. Deaton, MD;
Dipak K. Das, PhD
From the Departments of Surgery, University of Connecticut School of
Medicine, Farmington (M.S., H.O., N.M., D.K.D), and Baystate Medical Center,
Springfield, Mass (R.M.E., J.A.R., J.E.F., D.W.D.).
Correspondence to Richard M. Engelman, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut Ave, Springfield, MA 01199.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
BackgroundIschemic
preconditioning (PC) represents a
state-of-the-art technique
for myocardial preservation. Although
certain intracellular mediators
have been shown to play a role
in PC, the exact nature of the trigger
for PC is not known.
Our previous study demonstrated that intracellular
bradykinin
released from the heart during ischemia/reperfusion
plays a
role in myocardial preservation. This study was undertaken to
further
examine the mechanism of bradykinin-mediated PC.
Methods and ResultsSince the bradykinin B2 receptor
is likely to provide cardioprotection by blocking
angiotensin II formation, we determined the effects of an
angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker,
losartan, and a bradykinin B2 receptor blocker, HOE
140, on myocardial protection. Isolated rat hearts were perfused
initially by the Langendorff mode with Krebs-Henseleit buffer (KHB) for
15 minutes in the absence (control) or presence of losartan
(4.5 µmol/L) and/or HOE 140 (10 µmol/L). After conversion
to the working mode for 10 minutes (baseline), randomly assigned
control and experimental hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of
normothermic global ischemia followed by 2 hours of
reperfusion. Myocardial function, infarct size,
cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and amount of
bradykinin/angiotensin released from the hearts were
measured at baseline and during reperfusion while in the working mode.
Significant postischemic ventricular recovery
was demonstrated by improved developed pressure and aortic flow and
reduced myocardial infarct size and apoptotic cell death with
losartan, whereas the reverse was true for HOE 140. The
functional recovery and infarct sizelowering ability of
losartan were partially blocked and the antiapoptotic
function of losartan was completely blocked by HOE 140.
ConclusionsThe results document that losartan reduced
whereas HOE 140 increased myocardial ischemia/reperfusion
injury by blocking AT1 and bradykinin B2
receptors, respectively, suggesting a role of the bradykinin
B2 receptor in PC. Losartan provided
cardioprotection through both bradykinin-dependent and
bradykinin-independent mechanisms.
Key Words: ischemia reperfusion angiotensin bradykinin receptors
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Mammalian hearts have a remarkable ability to adapt
themselves
to potentially lethal exogenous stresses, which include
environmental
stresses such as hypoxia, heat shock, and
oxidative stress.
1 2 3 Increased tolerance to a sustained
ischemic insult by hearts
previously exposed to cyclic episodes
of brief periods of ischemia
and reperfusion has been
documented in numerous experimental
models. This transient adaptive
response associated with decreased
reperfusion-induced
arrhythmias, increased recovery of postischemic
contractile
function, and reduced infarct size is known as
ischemic preconditioning
(PC).
4
Despite the existence of an astronomic number of papers in the
literature demonstrating the cardioprotective abilities of PC, the
underlying cytoprotective mechanisms remain elusive. The current
hypothesis suggests that the trigger for classic PC is one or more
intracellular mediators including catecholamines,
adenosine, nitric oxide, bradykinin, and
angiotensin.5 6 These intracellular mediators
are released into the coronary circulation within minutes of
ischemia.7 8 These mediators either alone or in
combination potentiate a cascade of signal transduction involving
multiple kinases leading to the induction of the expression of
genes.9 10
A large number of studies including our own have implicated a role for
bradykinin in PC.6 11 We have also demonstrated the
cardioprotective abilities of ACE
inhibitors.12 The present study reinforces
the hypothesis that ACE inhibition potentiates PC through bradykinin
B2-receptor activation. Isolated rat hearts were
perfused in the absence or presence of losartan (an
angiotensin AT1
inhibitor), HOE 140 (a bradykinin B2
blocker) or both losartan and HOE 140 together. The results
document that HOE 140 increased myocardial ischemia/reperfusion
injury by blocking the bradykinin B2 receptor and
increasing angiotensin II formation. This suggests a role
of the bradykinin B2 receptor in PC.
Losartan reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury by
modulating the amount of bradykinin release from the heart. The infarct
sizelowering ability of losartan was partially blocked and
the antiapoptotic role was completely blocked by HOE 140,
documenting both the bradykinin-dependent and bradykinin-independent
mechanisms of losartan.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Isolated Perfused Heart Preparation
Sprague-Dawley rats weighing

300 g were anesthetized
with pentobarbital
(80 mg/kg IP). After intravenous
administration of heparin (500
IU/kg), the chests were opened and the
hearts were rapidly excised
and mounted on a nonrecirculating
Langendorff perfusion apparatus.
1 The
perfusion buffer used in this study consisted of a modified
Krebs-Henseleit
bicarbonate buffer (KHB) (in mmol/L: 118 NaCl, 4.7
KCl, 1.2
MgSO
4, 1.2
KH
2PO
4, 25
NaHCO
3, 10 glucose, and 1.7
CaCl
2, gassed
with 95%
O
25% CO
2, filtered
through a 5-µm filter
to remove any particulate contaminants, pH 7.4)
that was maintained
at a constant temperature of 37°C and was gassed
continuously
for the entire duration of the experiment. Left atrial
cannulation
was then carried out, and, after allowing for a
stabilization
period of 10 minutes in the retrograde perfusion mode,
the circuit
was switched to the antegrade working mode, which allows
for
the measurement of myocardial contractility as well
as aortic
and coronary flows, as described in detail in a
previous report.
1 Essentially, it is a left heart
preparation in which the heart
is perfused at a constant preload of 17
cm H
2O (being maintained
by means of a Masterflex
variable speed modular pump, Cole Palmer
Instrument Co) against an
afterload of 100 cm H
2O.
At the end of 10 minutes, after the attainment of a steady-state
cardiac function, baseline functional parameters were
recorded and coronary effluent samples were collected for
biochemical assays. The circuit was then switched back to the
retrograde mode and hearts were perfused (n=6 per group) with either
KHB alone (control) or KHB supplemented with losartan (4.5
µmol/L), HOE 140 (10 µmol/L), or both for 15 minutes. At the
end of this period, hearts were subjected to global ischemia
for 30 minutes followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. The first 10 minutes
of reperfusion was in the retrograde mode to allow for
postischemic stabilization and thereafter in the antegrade
working heart mode to allow for assessment of functional
parameters. A schematic of the protocol is shown in Figure 1
. Myocardial infarct size and
apoptosis were determined in the heart, whereas creatine
kinase, bradykinin, and angiotensin release were estimated
in the coronary effluent as described below.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Schemata of experimental protocol. Isolated
perfused rat hearts were stabilized for 15 minutes followed by
30-minute ischemia (30'Isch) and 2-hour perfusion.
Ventricular function (VF) and RIA for bradykinin and
angiotensin II were performed at baseline (BL) and during
reperfusion. Coronary effluents were taken at baseline and at
30 (R30), 60 (R60) and 120 (R120) minutes of reperfusion. Myocardial
infarct size and apoptosis were evaluated at end of 120 minutes
of reperfusion.
|
|
Measurement of Ventricular Function
Aortic pressure was measured with a Gould P23XL pressure
transducer (Gould Instrument Systems Inc) connected to a side arm of
the aortic cannula. The signal was amplified with a Gould 6600 series
signal conditioner and monitored on a CORDAT II real-time data
acquisition and analysis system (Triton Technologies). Heart
rate, developed pressure (defined as the difference of the maximum
systolic and diastolic aortic pressures), and the
first derivative of developed pressure were all derived or calculated
from the continuously obtained pressure signal. Aortic flow was
measured with a calibrated flowmeter (Gilmont Instruments Inc), and
coronary flow was measured by timed collection of the
coronary effluent dripping from the heart.
Evaluation of Myocardial Infarct Size
Hearts to be used for infarct size calculations were taken on
termination of the experiment and immersed in 1% triphenyl tetrazolium
solution in phosphate buffer
(Na2HPO4 88 mmol/L,
NaH2PO4 1.8 mmol/L)
for 10 minutes at 37°C and then stored at -70°C for later
processing. Frozen hearts (including only ventricular
tissue) were sliced transversely in a plane perpendicular to the
apical-basal axis into
0.5-mm-thick sections, blotted dry, placed in
between microscope slides, and scanned on a Hewlett-Packard Scanjet 5p
single-pass flat bed scanner. With the use of NIH 1.61 image processing
software, each digitized image was subjected to equivalent degrees of
background subtraction, brightness, and contrast enhancement for
improved clarity and distinctness. Risk (equivalent to total left
ventricular muscle mass) as well as infarct zones of each
slice were traced, and the respective areas were calculated in terms of
pixels. The weight of each slice was then recorded to facilitate
the expression of total and infarct masses of each slice in grams. The
risk and infarct volumes (in cm3) of each slice
were then calculated on the basis of slice weight to remove the
introduction of any errors caused by nonuniformity of heart slice
thickness. The risk volumes and infarct volumes of each slice were
summed to obtain the risk and infarct volumes for the whole heart.
Infarct size was taken to be the percent infarct volume/risk volume for
any one heart.
Evaluation of Apoptosis
Immunohistochemical detection of apoptotic cells was
carried out with the use of TUNEL, in which residues of
digoxigenin-labeled dUTP are catalytically incorporated into the DNA by
terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase II, an enzyme
that catalyzes a template-independent addition of
nucleotide triphosphate to the 3'-OH ends of double- or
single-stranded DNA.13 The incorporated
nucleotide was incubated with a sheep polyclonal
antidigoxigenin antibody followed by a FITC-conjugated rabbit
anti-sheep IgG as a secondary antibody as described by the manufacturer
(Apop Tag Plus, Oncor Inc). The sections (n=3) were washed in PBS 3
times, blocked with normal rabbit serum, and incubated with mouse
monoclonal antibody recognizing cardiac myosin heavy chain (Biogenesis
Ltd) followed by staining with TRIRC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG
(200:1 dilution, Dako Japan). The fluorescence staining was
viewed with a confocal laser microscope (Olympus Co). The number of
apoptotic cells was counted and expressed as a percentage of
total myocyte population.
Measurements of Bradykinin and Angiotensin in
Coronary Effluent
Bradykinin and angiotensin II were assayed by
radioimmunoassay (RIA) with standard RIA kits obtained from Peninsula
Laboratories Inc.
Statistical Analysis
A 2-way analysis of ANOVA followed by Scheffés
test was first carried out with the Primer Computer Program
(McGraw-Hill, 1988) to test for differences between groups. If
differences were established, the values were compared by means of a
Students t test for paired data. The values were expressed
as mean±SEM. The results were considered significant at a value of
P<0.05.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Effects of Losartan and HOE 140 on Postischemic
Ventricular Function
There were no differences in baseline function between the control
and
treatment groups. As expected, on reperfusion, the absolute
values
of aortic flow, developed pressure, and dP/dt
max
were
decreased in all groups as compared with the baseline values,
whereas
coronary flow did not show a significant change
(Figures 2

and
3

). Losartan-treated rat hearts
displayed significant recovery
of postischemic myocardial
function. This was evidenced by significantly
higher pressure and
aortic flow readings throughout the reperfusion
period. Significant
differences were observed at all time points.
In contrast, HOE
140treated hearts displayed significantly
lower
postischemic recovery in aortic flow, developed pressure,
and
dP/dt
max compared with those for the control
group. HOE 140
when combined with losartan significantly
attenuated the losartan-mediated
improved
ventricular function. Heart rates varied from 282 to
302
bpm for all groups and did not vary between groups (results
not
shown).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Effects of losartan, HOE 140, and
losartan+HOE 140 on coronary flow (top) and aortic flow
(bottom). Results are expressed as mean±SEM of 6 rats per group.
*P<0.05 compared with control; P<0.05
compared with losartan. Black bars indicate control; striped
bars, losartan; dotted bars, HOE 140; and hatched bars,
losartan+HOE 140. R30, R60, and R120 indicate reperfusion at
30, 60, and 120 minutes of reperfusion, respectively.
|
|

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Effects of losartan, HOE 140, and
losartan+HOE 140 on left ventricular developed
pressure (LVDP, top) and maximum first derivative of left
ventricular developed pressure (LVdp/dtmax,
bottom). Results are expressed as mean±SEM of 6 rats per group.
*P<0.05 compared with control; P<0.05
compared with losartan. Black bars indicate control; striped
bars, losartan; dotted bars, HOE 140; and hatched bars,
losartan+HOE 140. R30, R60, and R120 indicate 30, 60, and 120
minutes of reperfusion, respectively.
|
|
Effects of Losartan and HOE 140 on Myocardial
Infarction
Thirty minutes of ischemia followed by 2 hours of
reperfusion (control) caused a large myocardial infarct (>30% area of
risk) (Figure 4
). Normalized infarct size
in percent (infarct size/area of risk) in the control heart was
34.2±2.0 versus 20.0±1.8 for losartan, 41.3±3.2 for HOE 140,
and 25.4±1.9 for losartan+HOE 140treated hearts. Thus,
losartan reduced whereas HOE 140 increased infarct size
significantly compared with control. The change in infarct size by
losartan was significantly increased by HOE 140.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Effects of losartan, HOE 140, and
losartan+HOE 140 on myocardial infarct size. Results are
expressed as mean±SEM of 6 rats per group. *P<0.05
compared with control; P<0.05 compared with
losartan.
|
|
Effects of Losartan and HOE 140 on Cardiomyocyte
Apoptosis
We performed double-antibody staining by using antibody in an Apop
Tag kit and the monoclonal antibody recognizing cardiac myosin heavy
chain to specifically identify cardiomyocyte
apoptosis. A significant number of apoptotic myocytes
as well as nonmyocyte cells were visible in the normal hearts
subjected to 30 minutes of ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion
(Figure 5A
). The number of
apoptotic cells expressed as a percentage of total
cardiomyocyte population (Figure 5B
) was higher in
the hearts that were pretreated with HOE 140 compared with control
hearts. In contrast, only a few apoptotic cells and almost no
apoptotic cardiomyocytes were visible in the
losartan-treated hearts. This antiapoptotic property of
losartan was completely abolished by HOE 140 because the number
of apoptotic cells increased significantly (as in the HOE
140treated group) when hearts were simultaneously treated
with losartan and HOE 140.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Top, Effects of losartan, HOE 140, and
losartan+HOE 140 on cardiomyocyte
apoptosis. Control hearts (A) display large number of
apoptotic cells, which are reduced significantly by
losartan (B). Number of apoptotic
cardiomyocytes increased significantly in hearts treated
with HOE 140 (C) or losartan+HOE 140 (D). There are no
differences in number of apoptotic cells between
losartan and losartan+HOE 140 groups. Bottom, Number of
apoptotic cells expressed as percent of
cardiomyocyte population. Results are expressed as
mean±SEM of 6 rats per group. *P<0.05 compared with
control; P<0.05 compared with losartan.
|
|
Effects of Losartan and HOE 140 on Release of Bradykinin
and Angiotensin
As expected, an increased amount of bradykinin and
angiotensin II was found in the coronary effluent
from the postischemic control myocardium
(Figure 6
). HOE 140 almost completely
blocked the release of bradykinin but dramatically increased the
angiotensin II content of the effluent. Losartan
blocked angiotensin II and dramatically increased
bradykinin generation. Combined treatment of the hearts with HOE 140
and losartan reduced both bradykinin and
angiotensin II content in the perfusate.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Effects of losartan, HOE 140, and
losartan+HOE 140 on formation of bradykinin (top) and
angiotensin II (bottom). Results are expressed as mean±SEM
of 6 rats per group. *P<0.05 compared with control;
P<0.05 compared with losartan. indicates
control; , losartan; , HOE 140; and ,
losartan+HOE 140. BL indicates baseline, and 30R, 60R, and 120R
indicate 30, 60, 120 minutes of reperfusion, respectively.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The results of our study indicated significant
postischemic
ventricular recovery with
losartan, an AT
1 receptor blocker,
as
demonstrated by improved developed pressure and aortic flow
and reduced
myocardial infarct size. In contrast, HOE 140 aggravated
ischemia-reperfusion
injury by reducing the recovery of
postischemic contractile
function and increasing myocardial
infarct size. Additionally,
cardiomyocyte apoptosis
was reduced with losartan whereas HOE
140 accelerated
apoptotic cell death. Ischemia/reperfusion induced
the
generation of angiotensin II and bradykinin. HOE 140
blocked
bradykinin release and augmented the formation of
angiotensin
II whereas losartan blocked the
formation of angiotensin II
and augmented bradykinin
formation. The results document that
losartan reduced whereas
HOE 140 increased myocardial ischemia/reperfusion
injury by
blocking AT
1 and bradykinin
B
2 receptors, respectively,
suggesting a role of
the bradykinin B
2 receptor in PC.
Losartan
provided cardioprotection in 2 ways: (1) by reducing
infarct
size and improving ventricular function and (2) by
inhibiting
cardiomyocyte apoptosis. The
antiapoptotic function of losartan
was completely
blocked and the infarct sizelowering ability
was partially blocked by
HOE 140, suggesting a bradykinin-dependent
and bradykinin-independent
function of losartan. This is schematically
illustrated in
Figure 7

, in which blockage of the
AT
1 receptor
by losartan prevented
angiotensin II formation, whereas blockage
of the
B
2 receptor with HOE 140 both limited bradykinin
release
and increased angiotensin II formation.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Schematic showing interrelation of AT1
and B2 receptors and blockers in
ischemia/reperfusion and their role in limiting formation of
angiotensin II and preconditioning.
|
|
Both bradykinin and angiotensin have been implicated in
PC.6 11 In the pig heart, the bradykinin level was found
to increase within 3 minutes of PC and was blocked by HOE
140.14 Perfusion of guinea pig hearts with bradykinin for
10 minutes protected the hearts against free radical
injury.15 The cardioprotection induced by bradykinin in
both the pig and guinea pig was reversed by HOE 140, thus suggesting
the role of the bradykinin B2 receptor in such
preservation.14 16 In a study with open-chest dogs, the
antiarrhythmic effects of PC were abolished by blockade of the
bradykinin B2 receptor.17 Similar to
bradykinin, ACE inhibitors were found to potentiate a
preconditioning effect on the myocardium. For example,
enalaprilat, an ACE inhibitor, and an
angiotensin II receptor antagonist, EXP 3174,
reduced infarct size and augmented the PC effect in the pig
heart.18 Another ACE inhibitor, captopril,
also potentiated the myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of
PC.19
In the present study, losartan was used to block the
AT1 receptor. There are at least 2 distinct
subtypes of angiotensin II receptors, designated as
AT1 and AT2
receptors.20 The best characterized receptor
antagonists for AT1 and
AT2 are losartan and PD123319
(1-{[4-(dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl]methyl}-5-(diphenylacetyl)-4,5,6,7tetrahydro-1H-imidazo
[4,5-c] pyridine-6-carboxylic acid), respectively.20
Although both the AT1 and
AT2 receptors are known to modulate cardiac
function, the AT1 receptors particularly affect
the contractile and mitogenic action of
angiotensin II.21 The activation of the
AT1 receptor enhances phospholipase C, resulting
in the formation of inositol triphosphate (IP3)
and leading to intracellular Ca2+
overloading.22 Thus, blockade of the
AT1 receptor makes losartan an excellent
antihypertensive drug for treatment of hypertension. In addition,
losartan has found its use in the treatment of stroke,
malignant nephrosclerosis, and myocardial
infarction.
Although ACE antagonism or AT1 receptor blockade
has been found to mimic preconditioning, the mechanism(s) of action
remains unclear. It has been reported that ACE inhibitors
function in part by preserving bradykinin, and captopril, in
particular, was found to potentiate the infarct size-limiting effect of
PC through the bradykinin B2 receptor in an
isolated rabbit heart model.23 Another recent study showed
similar results as reported here, namely the bradykinin-dependent
cardioprotective effects of losartan against ischemia
and reperfusion in rat hearts.24 In the present study,
both the postischemic ventricular recovery and
infarct sizelowering abilities of losartan were partially
inhibited by HOE. Interestingly enough, the losartan-mediated
reduction of cardiomyocyte apoptosis was completely
abolished by HOE 140.
Our own laboratory has supported the notion that
cardiomyocyte apoptosis and necrosis are
independent contributors to myocardial infarction, and ischemia
and reperfusion lead both to apoptotic cell death and cell
necrosis whereas PC results in the decrease in both apoptosis
and necrosis.25 The results of this study also
demonstrated increased apoptosis in the ischemic
reperfused myocardium, with losartan significantly
decreasing apoptotic cell death. This was completely reversed
by HOE 140, suggesting that the losartan-mediated decrease in
cardiomyocyte apoptosis was due to bradykinin
B2 receptor activation. These results were
further supported by the observation that losartan
significantly increased bradykinin formation that was blocked by HOE
140.
In conclusion, this study showed that losartan mimicked the
preconditioning effects by its ability to reduce infarct size and to
improve postischemic ventricular recovery.
These cardioprotective properties of losartan were only
partially blocked by HOE 140. In contrast, losartan-mediated
decrease in cardiomyocyte apoptosis was completely
inhibited by HOE 140, suggesting the apoptotic cell
deathlowering ability of losartan was due to the bradykinin
B2-receptor activation. This study has documented
for the first time that losartan provided cardioprotection by
both bradykinin-dependent and bradykinin-independent pathways.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants
HL-34360,
HL-22559, HL-33889, and HL-56803 as well as by a Grant-in-Aid
from
the American Heart Association.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Engelman DT, Watanabe M, Engelman RM, et al.
Hypoxic preconditioning preserves antioxidant reserve in the working
rat heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1995;29:133140.[Medline]
-
Kingma JG. Cardiac adaptation to
ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;874:8399.[Medline]
-
Martin HL, Mestril R, Hilal-Dandan R, et al. Small
heat shock proteins and protection against ischemic injury in
cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 1997;96:43434348.[Abstract/Full Text]
-
Li GC, Vasquez BS, Gallagher KP, et al. Myocardial
protection with preconditioning. Circulation. 1990;82:609619.[Abstract]
-
Bolli R, Bhatti ZA, Tang XL, et al. Evidence that late
preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits is
triggered by the generation of nitric oxide. Circ Res. 1997;81:4252.[Abstract/Full Text]
-
Parratt JR, Vegh A, Papp JG. Bradykinin as an
endogenous myocardial protective substance with particular
reference to ischemic preconditioning-a brief review of the
evidence. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73:837842.[Medline]
-
Baumgarten CR, Linz W, Kunkel G, et al.
Ramiprilat increases bradykinin outflow from isolated
hearts of rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;108:293295.[Medline]
-
Hartman JC. The role of bradykinin and nitric oxide in
the cardioprotective action of ACE inhibitors. Ann
Thorac Surg. 1995;60:789792.[Abstract]
-
Maulik N, Yoshida T, Zu Y-L, et al. Ischemic
stress adaptation of heart triggers a tyrosine kinase regulated
signaling pathway: a potential role of MAPKAP kinase 2. Am J
Physiol. 1998;275:H1857H1864.[Medline]
-
Das DK, Maulik N, Moraru II. Gene expression in acute
myocardial stress. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27:181193.[Medline]
-
Sato M, Das DK, Engelman RM. Interaction of bradykinin
with angiotensin, prostacyclin, and nitric oxide in
myocardial preservation. Annals N Y Acad Sci. 1999;874:286294.
-
Engelman RM, Rousou JA, Iyengar J, et al. Captopril, an
ACE inhibitor, for optimizing reperfusion after acute
myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:918926.[Abstract]
-
Maulik N, Engelman RM, Rousou JA, et al.
Ischemic preconditioning reduces apoptosis by
upregulating anti-death gene bcl-2. Circulation.
2000;100(suppl II):II-369-II-375.
-
Schulz R, Post H, Vahlhaus C, et al. Ischemic
preconditioning in pigs: a graded phenomenon: its relation to
adenosine and bradykinin. Circulation. 1998;98:10221029.[Abstract/Full Text]
-
Jin Z-Q, Chen X. Bradykinin mediates myocardial
ischemic preconditioning against free radical injury in
guinea-pig isolated heart. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25:932935.[Medline]
-
Giannella E, Mochmann H-C, Levi R. Ischemic
preconditioning prevents the impairment of hypoxic coronary
vasodilation caused by ischemia/reperfusion. Circ
Res. 1997;81:415422.[Abstract/Full Text]
-
Vegh A, Papp JG, Parratt J. Attenuation of the
antiarrhythmic effects of ischemic preconditioning by blockade
of bradykinin B2 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1994;113:11671172.[Medline]
-
Schwarz ER, Montino H, Fleischhauer J, et al.
Angiotensin II receptor antagonist EXP 3174
reduces infarct size comparable with enalaprilat and augments
preconditioning in the pig heart. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997;11:687695.[Medline]
-
Miki T, Miura T, Ura N, et al. Captopril potentiates
the myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic
preconditioning through bradykinin B2 receptor activation. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:16161622.[Medline]
-
Steinberg MI, Weist SA, Palkowitz AD. Non-peptide Ang
II receptor antagonists. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 1993;11:312358.
-
Feolde E, Vigne P, Frelin C. Ang II receptor subtypes
and biological responses in the rat heart. J Mol Cell
Cardiol. 1993;25:13591367.[Medline]
-
Capponi AM. Distribution and signal transduction of
angiotensin II AT1 and AT2 receptors. Blood Press
Suppl. 1996;2:4146.[Medline]
-
Miki T, Miura T, Ura N, et al. Captopril potentiates
the myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic
preconditioning through bradykinin B2 receptor activation. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:16161622.[Medline]
-
Zhu P, Zaugg CE, Hornstein PS, et al.
Bradykinin-dependent cardioprotective effects of losartan
against ischemia reperfusion in rat hearts. J
Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;33:785790.[Medline]
-
Maulik N, Yoshida T, Engelman RM, et al.
Ischemic preconditioning attenuates apoptotic cell
death associated with ischemia/reperfusion. Mol Cell
Biochem. 1998;186:139145.[Medline]