Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:I-204-I-216

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines

(Circulation. 2000;102:I-204.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


ECC Guidelines

Part 7: The Era of Reperfusion

Section 2: Acute Stroke


*    Major Guidelines Changes
up arrowTop
*Major Guidelines Changes
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowED Triage and Treatment
down arrowPharmacological and...
down arrowReferences
 


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowMajor Guidelines Changes
*Introduction
down arrowED Triage and Treatment
down arrowPharmacological and...
down arrowReferences
 
A stroke is a disruption in blood supply to a region of the brain that causes neurological impairment. Stroke is ranked among the top 3 leading causes of death in most countries and is the leading cause of brain injury in adults. Internationally millions of people have a new or recurrent stroke each year, and nearly a quarter of these people die.1 The stroke rate is declining in most western and northern European countries, but there is a large and increasing rate in Russia, possibly attributable to a higher prevalence of hypertension.2 Although stroke mortality and attack rates are falling in many countries, the gain achieved by prevention has been counterbalanced by a growth in the aging population (more people at risk).3 4

Strokes can be classified into 2 major categories, ischemic and hemorrhagic. Approximately 85% of all strokes are ischemic.5 Ischemic strokes occur primarily because a blood vessel supplying the brain is occluded, usually by a thrombus or embolism. Hemorrhagic strokes are the result of rupture of a cerebral artery. Associated spasm of the artery and various degrees of bleeding occur. Until recently, care of the stroke patient was largely supportive, focusing on prevention and treatment of respiratory and cardiovascular complications. No specific therapy was available to alter the course and extent of the evolving stroke. Therefore, little emphasis or need was placed on rapid transport or intervention.

Fibrinolytic therapy now offers healthcare providers an opportunity to possibly limit the extent of neurological damage and to improve outcome in stroke patients. A time-dependent benefit similar to that observed in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is possible. The time available for treatment, however, is limited.6 Early recognition of stroke and rapid triage, evaluation in the Emergency Department (ED), and definitive management are essential.7 8 9

Early Recognition
Early treatment of stroke depends strongly on recognition of the event by the patient, family members, or bystanders.10 Common symptoms of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke are described in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Common Signs and Symptoms of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Stroke

Role of EMS in Stroke Care
Rapid activation of the EMS system is essential to optimize care of the patient with stroke. Stroke patients who use the EMS system arrive at the hospital faster than those who do not, a major advantage for time-critical treatment.11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Furthermore, emergency dispatchers can send the appropriate emergency team with a priority dispatch response and provide instructions for care of the patient until arrival of EMS personnel.19 20 21 EMS personnel can then quickly transport the patient to a stroke center and notify the facility before arrival to ensure rapid hospital-based evaluation and treatment. Initial contact of the family physician and transport of the patient by car have been shown to delay patient arrival and initial evaluation at the hospital. Such delays may render the patient ineligible for fibrinolytic therapy.11 15 19

Only half of stroke patients currently use the EMS system for transport to the hospital.11 22 Strokes that occur when the patient is alone or sleeping may further delay prompt recognition and action.23 Eighty-five percent of strokes occur at home.22 As a result, public education programs have appropriately focused their efforts on persons at risk for stroke and their friends and family members. Public education has reduced the time to arrival at the ED.8 12

The 7 "D’s" of Stroke Management
Key points in the management of stroke can be remembered by using the mnemonic of the 7 D’s: Detection, Dispatch, Delivery, Door, Data, Decision, and Drug (see algorithm for suspected stroke).24 Delay may occur at any point, so the response at each point must be skilled and efficient. The first 3 D’s (detection, dispatch, and delivery) are the responsibility of BLS providers in the community, including the lay public and EMS responders. Detection occurs when a patient, family member, or bystander recognizes the signs and symptoms of a stroke or TIA and activates the EMS system (by phoning 911 or other emergency response number). EMS dispatchers must prioritize the call for a suspected stroke patient as they would for a victim of AMI or serious trauma and dispatch the appropriate EMS team with high transport priority. EMS providers must respond rapidly, confirm the signs and symptoms of stroke, and transport the patient (delivery) to a stroke center (a hospital that can provide fibrinolytic therapy within 1 hour after arrival at the ED door). The remaining 3 D’s are performed in the hospital: data includes obtaining a computed tomography (CT) scan, decision is made in identifying candidates eligible for fibrinolytic therapy, and drug includes treating eligible patients with fibrinolytic therapy.Down



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Figure. Algorithm for suspected stroke.

Airway and Ventilation
Airway obstruction may be a major problem in acute stroke, particularly if the patient loses consciousness. Hypoxia and hypercarbia can occur as the result of inadequate ventilation, contributing to cardiac and respiratory instability. Aspiration of secretions or gastric contents is a serious complication associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. EMS providers must ensure that the patient has an adequate airway. Assisted ventilation or tracheal intubation may be required.

Vital Signs
Check vital signs (pulse, respirations, blood pressure, and temperature) frequently to detect abnormalities and changes. Abnormal respirations are particularly prevalent in comatose stroke patients and usually reflect serious brain dysfunction. Hypertension often occurs after a stroke and may be caused by underlying hypertension, a stress reaction to the neurological event, or a physiological response to decreased brain perfusion. Blood pressure often returns to normal without antihypertensive treatment.25

A variety of cardiovascular problems may be present in the patient with stroke. Cardiac arrhythmias may contribute to the cerebral thromboembolism, or they may be the consequence of brain injury. In particular, episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, severe symptomatic bradycardia, or high-degree atrioventricular block may point to cardiac rhythm disturbances as causative or contributory. In the elderly and in patients with diabetes, AMI with atypical or undetectable symptoms can occur.26 27 Obtain a 12-lead ECG and attempt to rule out left ventricular mural emboli if an acute or recent MI is suspected. Life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias are a potential early complication of stroke, particularly of intracranial hemorrhages.28 29 30 Continuous monitoring of cardiac rhythm and systemic perfusion is part of the early management of a stroke patient.

General Medical Assessment
Examine the patient for evidence of injury to the head or neck, because trauma is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of stroke. Blood pressure in both upper extremities should be measured. A difference of >10 mm Hg should raise consideration of aortic dissection and compromise of brain blood supply. Perform diagnostic studies such as CT or angiography if indicated by history or clinical findings. Cardiac murmur, arterial bruit, absent pulse, or other abnormalities should be sought during the cardiovascular examination. The presence of an ocular hemorrhage may allow early identification of intracranial bleeding.

Brief Emergency Neurological Evaluation
The emergency neurological evaluation for stroke should include 6 key elements:

Stroke Screen or Scale
Performing an extensive neurological examination outside the hospital is impractical because it delays transport of the patient to the ED. To conduct an out-of-hospital neurological evaluation, use a validated tool such as the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (Table 2Down) or the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)16 (Table 3Down).31 32 The Cincinnati scale is used to elicit any of the 3 major physical findings suggestive of stroke: facial droop, arm drift, and abnormal speech.31 LAPSS requires the examiner to rule out other causes of altered level of consciousness (eg, history of seizures or severe hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia) and then identify asymmetry (right versus left) in facial smile/grimace, grip, or arm strength. Asymmetry in any category indicates a possible stroke18 32 These two scales are sensitive and specific in identifying stroke patients.18 31 32 Either evaluation can be performed quickly.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)

Ambulance personnel can identify stroke patients with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Once a stroke is suspected, minimize time in the field and immediately transport the patient to a stroke center.

Clinical signs and symptoms of acute stroke often fluctuate. Deterioration or improvement can be detected by frequent and repeated focal neurological examinations. Repeated examinations need not be exhaustive. The Glasgow Coma Scale tests eye opening, verbal response, and motor response.33 It is useful for assessing the initial severity of neurological injury in patients with altered consciousness, especially in cases of injury caused by intracerebral hemorrhage.

Obtain the following information en route to or at the hospital. (Do not delay transport to complete a more detailed evaluation. Rapid transport is essential.)

Time of Onset of Symptoms
If stroke symptoms started within 6 hours of the arrival of EMS personnel, immediately notify the receiving hospital. Prearrival notification of the receiving hospital shortens the time to definitive hospital-based evaluation and intervention. Provide results of the stroke scale or screen, the Glasgow Coma Scale score, and the estimated time of symptom onset in addition to standard information. This allows the ED or Casualty Service time to prepare and coordinate the patient’s time-sensitive therapy. The receiving hospital should have a written plan to begin therapy as quickly as possible.

Level of Consciousness
Determining the stroke patient’s level of consciousness is crucial. Depressed consciousness within hours of the onset of symptoms implies severe brain injury with increased intracranial pressure (ICP), usually due to an intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Coma, the lack of any purposeful response to external stimuli, is the result of damage to both cerebral hemispheres or the brain stem. Coma usually implies massive hemorrhage, occlusion of the basilar artery, or cardiac arrest with global brain ischemia. Massive ischemic stroke with cerebral edema may cause coma but is rare. Do not overlook concurrent metabolic problems. Consider drug overdose, sepsis, or severe metabolic abnormalities.

Type of Stroke (Ischemic Versus Hemorrhagic)
The history and physical findings of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke overlap (see Table 4Down). Do not depend solely on clinical presentation for diagnosis. In most cases, noncontrast CT is the definitive test for differentiating ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. (CT is discussed in "Emergency Diagnostic Studies.")


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Presenting Clinical Features of Hemorrhagic and Nonhemorrhagic Stroke

Location of Stroke
Higher cortical, language, visual, cranial nerve, motor, and sensory functions should be assessed in alert patients with brain infarction. Neurological signs help distinguish infarction of the carotid territory from infarction with a vertebrobasilar distribution. Crossed (cranial nerve palsy with contralateral motor or sensory deficit) or bilateral neurological signs suggest that the infarct is located in the brain stem. Specific patterns of deficit, such as pure sensory stroke or dysarthria with a clumsy hand, may be present. Such deficits suggest a subcortical or lacunar infarct caused by small-vessel disease. The specificity of clinical signs such as pure motor deficit, however, is low. Distinguishing between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts on the basis of clinical features is often difficult, especially within hours of the onset of stroke.

Severity of Stroke
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) measures neurological function, and scores on this scale are correlated with the severity of stroke and long-term outcome in patients with ischemic stroke.25 34 35 The scale provides a reliable, valid, and easy-to-perform alternative to the standard neurological evaluation for patients with ischemic stroke, and it has been used for triage of patients to different treatment protocols.36 37 The NIHSS total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 42 points, evaluating 5 major areas of functioning:

  1. Level of consciousness
  2. Visual function
  3. Motor function
  4. Sensation and neglect
  5. Cerebellar function
  6. The NIHSS is not a comprehensive neurological examination (eg, it does not record gait or all cranial nerve deficits), and more detailed neurological assessment may be required in certain cases.
  7. The Scandinavian Stroke Scale was used in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study and has been shown to identify predictors of early and late progression in stroke patients.38 39
  8. The Hunt and Hess Scale (see Table 5Down) is often used to grade the severity of stroke in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.40 The Hunt and Hess grade is correlated with survival after subarachnoid hemorrhage and the risk of complications such as vasospasm. The scale may be used to guide the timing of aneurysm clipping or coiling.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Hunt and Hess Scale for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Differential Diagnosis
Very few nonvascular neurological diseases will cause sudden onset of focal brain dysfunction, the hallmark of stroke. The list of potential diagnoses (see Table 6Down) is longer if the patient is comatose and the medical history is unavailable. If the patient’s condition gradually worsens over several days, a nonvascular neurological disease may be present.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Differential Diagnosis of Stroke

Prehospital Transport
EMS systems should develop protocols that provide for priority dispatch, treatment, and transport of patients with signs and symptoms of acute ischemic stroke. These protocols should convey the same urgency as those for patients with signs and symptoms of AMI or major trauma (Class IIb). Give highest priority to patients with a suspected stroke and airway compromise or an altered level of consciousness.

In addition, triage and transport patients with acute onset of stroke symptoms to a facility that can begin fibrinolytic therapy within 1 hour of arrival, unless that facility is >30 minutes away by ground ambulance (Class IIb).


*    ED Triage and Treatment
up arrowTop
up arrowMajor Guidelines Changes
up arrowIntroduction
*ED Triage and Treatment
down arrowPharmacological and...
down arrowReferences
 
The ED must be prepared for the arrival of the stroke patient so that triage and therapy can begin immediately. Maximum time intervals for completion of diagnostic studies of candidates for fibrinolytic therapy are listed in Table 7Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. NINDS-Recommended Stroke Evaluation Targets for Potential Fibrinolytic Candidates1

Emergency Diagnostic Studies
Emergency diagnostic studies are used to establish stroke as the cause of the patient’s symptoms, to differentiate between brain infarction and brain hemorrhage, and to determine the most likely cause of the stroke. Protocols may prioritize and streamline the order of these tests.

CT is the most important diagnostic test for differentiating between infarction and hemorrhage or other intracranial masses.41 To avoid confusing blood and contrast medium, perform CT without contrast enhancement. Withhold anticoagulants and fibrinolytics until brain hemorrhage is ruled out.

The CT scan of almost all patients with a recent intracerebral hemorrhage will show increased density at the site of bleeding.42 Findings in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, however, may be subtle (eg, the scan may show only a thin, white layer adjacent to the brain). Approximately 5% of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage will have normal findings on the CT scan.43 44 Such patients usually have a small subarachnoid hemorrhage and are alert with no focal neurological deficits (Hunt and Hess grade 1). If clinical suspicion of subarachnoid hemorrhage remains despite negative findings on the CT scan, perform lumbar puncture.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not part of the routine evaluation of acute stroke. MRI is very sensitive and will detect some lesions missed by CT. Although MRI can detect early hemorrhage,45 46 it is not superior to CT. MRI is also time consuming and may hamper continuous observation of acutely ill patients. New MRI techniques such as magnetic resonance angiography and diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI may help delineate the site of occlusion or the region of the brain at risk for infarction.47 48 These techniques are being evaluated for use in clinical practice. Diffusion-weighted MRI has been approved for use in stroke patients by the US Food and Drug Administration (Class Indeterminate).

Emergency cerebral angiography is performed in many patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in anticipation of aneurysm clipping. Neurointerventional procedures such as aneurysm coiling, angioplasty, and intra-arterial thrombolysis also require emergency angiography in certain patients. Many other studies, including echocardiography, ultrasonography of the carotid artery, and transcranial Doppler, can be performed electively.

Emergency Management
Rapidly identify, evaluate, and treat all patients with signs and symptoms of acute stroke. Stroke protocols and pathways may assist in the rapid assessment of these patients. Clinicians may find the use of a checklist helpful to identify contraindications to tPA therapy.49 Target times for in-hospital evaluation and treatment are given in Table 7Up.50

General Emergency Therapy
Establish intravenous access en route to the hospital or in the ED (see Table 8Down). Administer normal saline or lactated Ringer’s solution at a rate of 50 mL/h. Unless the patient is hypotensive, avoid rapid infusions, which increase the risk of cerebral edema. Do not administer dextrose in water unless hypoglycemia is strongly suspected; this solution is hypotonic and may increase cerebral edema.51 52 53 54 55 56 57 Correct hyperglycemia and hyperthermia (Class IIa). Do not routinely administer supplemental oxygen to nonhypoxic (oxygen saturation >90%) stroke victims with minor or moderate strokes. Oxygen may be beneficial, however, to patients with severe strokes, but additional research is needed.58


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. General Management of Acute Stroke

Management of Elevated Blood Pressure
Management of blood pressure after acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke is controversial. Many patients have hypertension after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, but few require emergency treatment. Elevated blood pressure after a stroke is not a hypertensive emergency unless there are other medical problems (eg, AMI or aortic dissection).59 In most patients, blood pressure will spontaneously decline as pain, agitation, vomiting, and increased ICP are controlled.25

Antihypertensive treatment is reserved for patients with markedly elevated blood pressures or specific medical indications. Current recommendations are based on the type of stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) and whether the patient with ischemic stroke is a candidate for fibrinolytic therapy. In response to requests for general guidance regarding the management of hypertension in stroke patients, a table of suggested antihypertensive therapy approaches is provided (see Table 9Down). It is important to note, however, that these suggestions were based on consensus opinion and are not evidence-based.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9. Suggested Antihypertensive Therapy for Patients With Acute Stroke

Antihypertensive therapy can be harmful. Antihypertensive therapy can lower the cerebral perfusion pressure and lead to worsening of the stroke.59 In addition, the response of stroke patients to antihypertensive therapy can be exaggerated. Use of short-acting nifedipine is contraindicated.59 For patients with an arterial occlusion, maintenance of adequate collateral flow is of paramount importance.

In candidates for fibrinolytic therapy, however, strict control of blood pressure is required to reduce the potential for bleeding. Fibrinolytic therapy is not recommended for patients who have a systolic blood pressure >185 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure >110 mm Hg at the time of treatment (see Table 9Up).60 61 Simple measures often can lower blood pressure below this level. If more aggressive measures are required, do not use fibrinolytics.

Management of Seizures
Recurrent seizures are a potentially life-threatening complication of stroke. They can worsen the stroke and should be controlled. Administration of anticonvulsant medications to prevent recurrent seizures is strongly recommended, but prophylactic administration is not indicated.59 Protection of the airway, administration of supplementary oxygen, and maintenance of normothermia are part of supportive care.

Benzodiazepines are first-line agents for treating seizures. Intravenous diazepam (5 mg over 2 minutes to a maximum of 10 mg) or lorazepam (1 to 4 mg over 2 to 10 minutes) usually will stop seizures but may produce respiratory depression. Lorazepam, which has a short half-life, may be the superior agent. Administration of these agents can be repeated, but they should be followed by a longer-acting anticonvulsant such as phenytoin, fosphenytoin, or phenobarbital.

Management of Increased ICP
Death during the first week after stroke commonly is caused by brain edema and increased ICP. Fortunately only 10% to 20% of stroke patients develop brain edema sufficient to cause clinical deterioration. When brain edema is clinically suspect, modest fluid restriction, elevation of the head of the bed (20° to 30°), support of oxygenation and ventilation (avoidance of hypoxemia and hypoventilation), and control of agitation and pain will help lower increased ICP. Goals of therapy are (1) reduction of increased ICP, (2) maintenance of cerebral perfusion to prevent worsening of ischemia, and (3) prevention of brain herniation.

Reduction of the partial pressure of CO2 in arterial gas (PaCO2) through intubation and hyperventilation is the most rapid means of lowering ICP in cases of impending brain herniation. Optimal PaCO2 is 30 to 35 mm Hg.62 PaCO2 values <=25 mm Hg are occasionally acceptable in rapidly deteriorating patients, but if such values are sustained, ischemia of the brain may occur.62 Aggressive tracheal suctioning increases ICP and should be avoided, with suctioning reduced in frequency and duration to that necessary to maintain tracheal tube patency.

Hyperosmolar therapy with mannitol is used to reduce the mass effect on diencephalic structures or to maximize cerebral perfusion pressure. Mannitol can be given as a bolus (0.25 to 0.5 g/kg per dose given over 20 minutes rapidly) and repeated every 6 hours to a maximum dose of 2 g/kg daily.59 High initial doses are given in emergencies. The effect on ICP usually occurs about 20 minutes after administration. Lower doses (25 to 50 g every 4 hours) given as intermittent boluses are used to manage ICP over longer periods. Furosemide, hypertonic saline, and acetazolamide may also help lower ICP.

High doses of barbiturates (eg, thiopental 1 to 5 mg/kg) rapidly lower ICP and suppress electrical brain activity. Because high doses of barbiturates suppress respiratory activity and may produce vasodilation and myocardial depression, they should be administered in conjunction with mechanical ventilatory support and careful blood pressure monitoring. ICP must be monitored when a barbiturate coma is induced, because the barbiturates obliterate the clinical response. The ICP is used to evaluate response to therapy.

Routine measurement of ICP is not indicated, and the value of ICP measurement has not been shown. ICP measurement, however, may be helpful in deteriorating patients, can guide therapy, and can serve as an indicator of prognosis and outcome.59

Neurosurgical decompression can be lifesaving in some patients with high ICP and intracranial hemorrhage, edema after stroke, or other mass effects on brain tissue. Surgery for cerebellar hemorrhage or edema after stroke can produce remarkable improvement. Pharmacological and ventilatory measures for controlling ICP are much less effective than surgery in patients with cerebellar lesions. Corticosteroids are not effective and should not be used.63 Cerebellar edema or hemorrhage frequently causes obstructive hydrocephalus, necessitating ventricular drainage. Closely monitor patients with cerebellar lesions for neurological deterioration.


*    Pharmacological and Interventional Therapies
up arrowTop
up arrowMajor Guidelines Changes
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowED Triage and Treatment
*Pharmacological and...
down arrowReferences
 
Ischemic Stroke
Fibrinolytic Therapy
Use of intra-arterial and intravenous fibrinolytic agents such as tPA, streptokinase, ancrod, urokinase, and prourokinase in stroke patients has been evaluated in several clinical trials.39 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 The Cochrane Stroke Review group73 evaluated 17 trials with >5000 patients in which >50% of patients received tPA. Fibrinolytic therapy significantly increased the odds ratio of death within the first 10 days and at follow-up, mainly because of fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients treated within 3 hours, however, had reduced death and dependency compared with patients treated within 3 to 6 hours. Overall, the proportion of patients with death or disability was reduced. It is difficult to draw conclusions from this review because there was significant heterogeneity among the comparison trials.73 In the clinical trials reviewed, many different agents were administered, with many different time intervals between onset of stroke symptoms and drug administration.

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rtPA Stroke Trial64 evaluated a single agent administered within 3 hours of symptom onset in a prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Intravenous tPA was administered in a dose of 0.9 mg given as a 10% bolus over 1 minute, followed by a 1-hour infusion versus a placebo. In this trial, patients treated with tPA within 3 hours of onset of symptoms were at least 30% more likely to have minimal or no disability at 3 months compared with those treated with placebo. The risk of fatal intracranial hemorrhage, however, was 10 times greater in the tPA-treated group (3% versus 0.3%). A similar increase in the frequency of all symptomatic hemorrhages (6.4% versus 0.6%) was also observed in this group. This increase in symptomatic hemorrhage did not lead to an overall increase in mortality in the treated group.

Based on the results of parts I and II of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke study, intravenous administration of tPA is recommended for carefully selected patients with acute ischemic stroke if they have no contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy and if the drug can be administered within 3 hours of the onset of stroke symptoms (Class I). Contraindications to tPA are listed in Table 10Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 10. Contraindications to tPA Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Investigators have tried to extend the time for treatment beyond 3 hours by using various fibrinolytic agents and new approaches to administration (eg, intra-arterial therapy).39 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 Evidence suggested that use of intravenous tPA 3 to 6 hours after the onset of symptoms may be beneficial in certain patients,73 but recent studies have been discouraging. The ATLANTIS Trial found no significant differences in 90-day efficacy end points in patients treated between 3 and 5 hours.65 The Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Study enrolled 142 patients at 42 sites in North America and found a small but significant benefit of tPA in patients treated after 3 hours when assessed at 1 day; this benefit was not maintained at 30 days.74 In both of these trials, the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was increased. At this time routine use of intravenous tPA >3 hours after the onset of symptoms is not recommended (Class Indeterminate).

Results of a recent, randomized trial of intra-arterial prourokinase suggest that use of intra-arterial fibrinolytic agents 3 to 6 hours after the onset of symptoms may be beneficial in patients with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (Class IIb).71

Three large, randomized trials of streptokinase in patients with stroke have been reported.69 70 75 All 3 studies were suspended because of increased hemorrhage and mortality in the group treated with streptokinase. Do not use streptokinase in patients who have had a stroke except in clinical studies approved by the appropriate institutional review board.

Anticoagulant Therapy
The efficacy of anticoagulants in acute stroke has not been established. Heparin is frequently administered to patients with acute ischemic stroke, but its value is unproved.76 77 Heparin may help prevent recurrent embolism or propagation of a thrombus, but it may lead to bleeding complications, including brain hemorrhage. There is no consensus on when heparin therapy should be started or on the dose and duration of therapy. Emergency physicians should consult the attending neurologist about the use of heparin in specific patients (Class IIb). Low-molecular-weight anticoagulants have several advantages not provided by unfractionated heparin.71 Use of low-molecular-weight anticoagulants in the management of stroke is being evaluated.

Aspirin, warfarin, and ticlopidine reduce the risk of subsequent stroke in patients with TIA.78 79 80 81 These antiplatelet agents should be started within the first few days after a TIA. When started within 48 hours of the onset of ischemic stroke, aspirin produces a small but definite net benefit in patients who are ineligible for fibrinolytic therapy.82 83 Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 160 to 300 mg daily within 48 hours of onset of presumed ischemic stroke reduces the risk of early recurrent ischemic stroke without a major risk of early hemorrhagic complications and improves long-term outcome.84

The Cochrane Stroke Group completed a comprehensive review of anticoagulants in 21 trials involving 23 427 patients. A number of anticoagulants were used in clinical trials: standard unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, heparinoids, oral anticoagulants, and thrombin inhibitors. The conclusion of the Cochrane group was that immediate anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke is not associated with net gain for either short- or long-term benefit. Routine use of any type of anticoagulant in acute ischemic stroke is not recommended.85

Other Treatments
Calcium channel–blocking drugs, volume expansion, hemodilution, and low-molecular-weight dextran have not been shown to improve clinical outcome after ischemic stroke. A number of cytoprotective agents are being investigated for use in patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Many of these agents have been shown to provide no benefit in humans, even though benefit was shown in animal models.86

Hemorrhagic Stroke
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage often require emergency arteriography. If a saccular aneurysm is detected, early intracranial surgery with clipping (or coiling) of the aneurysm is usually advised.87 The calcium channel–blocking drug nimodipine (60 mg orally every 4 hours, 0.35 mg/kg) improves outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.88 89 90 91 92 Correction of hyponatremia and water loss is also important. Avoid strict fluid restriction, however, which may stimulate inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone.

Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Hemorrhage into the brain can be devastating. Death may occur because of compression or distortion of vital deep-brain structures or increased ICP. Mortality is a function of the volume and location of the intracerebral bleeding. Optimal management requires prevention of continued bleeding, appropriate management of ICP, and timely neurosurgical decompression when warranted. Large intracerebral or cerebellar hematomas often require surgical intervention. A CT scan is required for differential diagnosis. Placement of a ventriculostomy tube through a burr hole can be lifesaving if hydrocephalus is the cause of coma.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table A1. Appendix A: NIH Stroke Scale "Quick and Easy" Version


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table A1A. Appendix A: Continued


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table B1. Appendix B: Scandinavian Stroke Scale (Scandinavian Stroke Study Group, 1985)


*    Footnotes
 
Circulation. 2000;102(suppl I):I-204–I-216.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowMajor Guidelines Changes
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowED Triage and Treatment
up arrowPharmacological and...
*References
 
1. Broderick JP, Brott T, Tomsick T, Huster G, Miller R. The risk of subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhages in blacks as compared with whites. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:733–736.[Medline]

2. Stegmayr B, Vinogradova T, Malyutina S, Peltonen M, Nikitin Y, Asplund K. Widening gap of stroke between east and west: eight-year trends in occurrence and risk factors in Russia and Sweden. Stroke. 2000;31:2–8.[Abstract/Full Text]

3. Thorvaldsen P, Davidsen M, Bronnum-Hansen H, Schroll M. Stable stroke occurrence despite incidence reduction in an aging population: stroke trends in the Danish monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease (MONICA) population. Stroke. 1999;30:2529–2534.[Abstract/Full Text]

4. Thorvaldsen P, Kuulasmaa K, Rajakangas AM, Rastenyte D, Sarti C, Wilhelmsen L. Stroke trends in the WHO MONICA project. Stroke. 1997;28:500–506.[Abstract/Full Text]

5. Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, Samsa GP. Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2523–2528.[Abstract/Full Text]

6. Grotta JC. The importance of time. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification and Treatment of Acute Stroke. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 1997:5–9.

7. Pepe PE. Overview: the initial links in the chain of recovery for brain attack: access, prehospital care, notification, and treatment. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification and Treatment of Acute Stroke. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 1997:17–28.

8. Spilker JA. Overview: the importance of patient and public education in acute ischemic stroke. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification and Treatment of Acute Stroke. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 1997:119–126.

9. Sayre MR, Swor RA, Honeycutt LK. Prehospital identification and treatment. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification and Treatment of Acute Stroke. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 1997:35–44.

10. Kothari R, Sauerbeck L, Jauch E, Broderick J, Brott T, Khoury J, Liu T. Patients’ awareness of stroke signs, symptoms, and risk factors. Stroke. 1997;28:1871–1875.[Abstract/Full Text]

11. Barsan WG, Brott TG, Broderick JP, Haley EC, Levy DE, Marler JR. Time of hospital presentation in patients with acute stroke. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2558–2561.[Medline]

12. Alberts MJ, Perry A, Dawson DV, Bertels C. Effects of public and professional education on reducing the delay in presentation and referral of stroke patients. Stroke. 1992;23:352–356.[Abstract]

13. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Study Group. A systems approach to immediate evaluation and management of hyperacute stroke. Experience at eight centers and implications for community practice and patient care. Stroke. 1997;28:1530–1540.[Abstract/Full Text]

14. Crocco TJ, Kothari RU, Sayre MR, Liu T. A nationwide prehospital stroke survey. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3:201–206.[Medline]

15. Ferro JM, Melo TP, Oliveira V, Crespo M, Canhao P, Pinto AN. An analysis of the admission delay of acute strokes. Cerebrovasc Dis.. 1994;4:72–75.

16. Kothari R, Jauch E, Broderick J, Brott T, Sauerbeck L, Khoury J, Liu T. Acute stroke: delays to presentation and emergency department evaluation. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:3–8.[Medline]

17. Morris DL, Rosamond WD, Hinn AR, Gorton RA. Time delays in accessing stroke care in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:218–223.[Abstract/Full Text]

18. Kidwell CS, Saver JL, Schubert GB, Eckstein M, Starkman S. Design and retrospective analysis of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS). Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998;2:267–273.[Medline]

19. Kothari R, Barsan W, Brott T, Broderick J, Ashbrock S. Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:937–941.[Abstract/Full Text]

20. Zachariah B, Dunford J, Van Cott CC. Dispatch life support and the acute stroke patient: making the right call. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification and Treatment of Acute Stroke. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 1997:29–34.

21. Davalos A, Castillo J, Martinez-Vila E, Cerebrovascular Diseases Study Group of the Spanish Society of Neurology. Delay in neurological attention and stroke outcome.. Stroke. 1995;26:2233–2237.[Medline]

22. Lyden PD, Rapp K, Babcock T, Rothcock J. Ultra-rapid identification, triage, and enrollment of stroke patients into clinical trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:106–107.

23. Bornstein NM, Gur AY, Fainshtein P, Korczyn AD. Stroke during sleep: epidemiological and clinical features. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9:320–322.[Medline]

24. Hazinski MF. Demystifying recognition and management of stroke. Curr Emerg Card Care. 1996;7:8–9.

25. Broderick J, Brott T, Barsan W. Blood pressure during the first minutes of focal cerebral ischemia. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1438–1443.[Medline]

26. Maggioni AP, Franzosi MG, Farina ML, Santoro E, Celani MG, Ricci S, Tognoni G, Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Cerebrovascular events after myocardial infarction: analysis of the GISSI trial. BMJ. 1991;302:1428–1431.[Medline]

27. Mooe T, Eriksson P, Stegmayr B. Ischemic stroke after acute myocardial infarction: a population based study. Stroke.. 1997;28:762–767.[Abstract/Full Text]

28. Silver FL, Norris JW, Lewis AL. Early mortality following stroke: a prospective review. Stroke. 1984;45:492–496.

29. Tokgozoglu SL, Batur MK, Topcuoglu MA. Effects of stroke localization on cardiac autonomic balance and sudden death. Stroke.. 1999;30:1307–1311.[Abstract/Full Text]

30. Korpelainen JT, Sotaniemi KA, Makikallio A. Dynamic behavior of heart rate in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:1008–1013.[Abstract/Full Text]

31. Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity [see comments]. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:373–378.[Medline]

32. Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Weems K, Saver JL. Identifying stroke in the field: prospective validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS). Stroke. 2000;31:71–76.[Abstract/Full Text]

33. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84.[Medline]

34. Brott G, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870.[Abstract]

35. Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, Marler J, Kothari R, Brott T, Zivin J, NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:2347–2354.[Abstract/Full Text]

36. Lewandowski CA, Frankel M, Tomsick TA, Broderick J, Frey J, Clark W, Starkman S, Grotta J, Spilker J, Khoury J, Brott T, and the Emergency Management of Stroke (EMS) Bridging Trial Investigators. Combined intravenous and intra-arterial r-TPA versus intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2598–2609.[Abstract/Full Text]

37. DeGraba TJ, Hallenbeck JM, Pettirew KD. Progression in acute stroke: value of the initial NIH Stroke Scale score on patient stratification in future trials. Stroke.. 1999;30:1208–1212.[Abstract/Full Text]

38. Davalos A, Toni D, Iweins F, Lesaffre E, Bastianello S, Castillo J. Neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: potential predictors and associated factors in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) I. Stroke. 1999;30:2631–2636.[Abstract/Full Text]

39. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Mahagne MH, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA. 1995;274:1017–1025.[Medline]

40. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:14–20.[Medline]

41. Gilman S. Imaging the brain. N Engl J Med.. 1998;338:812–820, 889–896.[Medline]

42. Davis KR, Ackerman RH, Kistler JP. Computed tomography of cerebral infarction: hemorrhagic, contrast enhancement, and time of appearance. Comput Tomogr. 1977;1:71–86.[Medline]

43. Sames TA, Storrow AB, Finkelstein JA, Magoon MR. Sensitivity of new-generation computer tomography in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:16–20.[Abstract]

44. Adams HP Jr, Kassell NF, Torner JC, Sahs AL. CT and clinical correlations in recent aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a preliminary report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Neurology.. 1983;33:981–988.[Medline]

45. Linfante I, Llinas RH, Caplan LR. MRI features of intracerebral hemorrhage within 2 hours from symptom onset. Stroke. 1999;30:2263–2267.[Abstract/Full Text]

46. Schellinger PD, Jansen O, Fiebach JB. A standardized MRI stroke protocol: comparison with CT in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1999;30:765–768.[Abstract/Full Text]

47. Baird AE, Benfield A, Schlaug G. Enlargement of human cerebral ischemic lesion volumes measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:581–589.[Medline]

48. Tong DC, Yenari MA, Albers GW. Correlation of perfusion and diffusion weighted MRI with NIHSS score in acute (<6.5 hour) ischemic stroke. Neurology. 1998;50:864–870.[Medline]

49. Hazinski MF, Cummins RO, Field JM. 2000 Handbook of Emergency Cardiovascular Care for Healthcare Providers. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 2000.

50. Barsan WG. Overview: emergency department management of stroke. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification and Treatment of Acute Stroke. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; 1997:49–54.

51. Weir CJ, Murray GD, Dyker AG. Is hyperglycemia an independent predictor of poor outcome after acute stroke? results of a long-term follow-up study. BMJ. 1997;314:1303–1306.[Abstract/Full Text]

52. Helgasun CM. Blood glucose and stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1049–1053.[Medline]

53. De Courten-Myers GM, Kleinholz M, Hulm P, et al. Hemorrhagic infarct conversion in experimental stroke. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:210–215.

54. Broderick JP, Hagen T, Brott T. Hyperglycemia and hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarcts. Stroke. 1995;26:4848–4887.

55. Yip PK, He YY, Hsu CY et al. Effect of plasma glucose on infarct size in focal cerebral ischemia reperfusion. Neurology. 1991;41:899–905.[Medline]

56. Chew W, Kucharczky J, Moseley M. Hyperglycemia augments ischemic brain injury: in vivo MR imaging spectroscopic study with nicardipine in cats with occluded middle cerebral arteries. Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:603–609.[Medline]

57. Vazquez-Cruz J, Marti-Vilata JT, Ferrer L. Progressing cerebral infarction in relation to plasma glucose in gerbils. Stroke. 1990;21:1621–1642.[Abstract]

58. Ronning OM, Guldvog B. Should stroke victims routinely receive supplemental oxygen? a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2033–2037.[Abstract/Full Text]

59. Adams HJ, Brott T, Crowell R, Furlan A, Gomez C, Grotta J, Helgason C, Marler J, Woolson R, Zivin J, Feinberg W, Mayberg M. Guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1994;25:1901–1914.[Medline]

60. Brott T, Lu M, Kothari R, Fagan SC, Frankel M, Grotta JC, Broderick J, Kwiatkowski T, Lewandowski C, Haley EC, Marler JR, Tilley BC. Hypertension and its treatment in the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1998;29:1504–1509.[Abstract/Full Text]

61. Adams HJ, Brott T, Furlan A, Gomez C, Grotta J, Helgason C, Kiatkowski T, Lyden P, Marler J, Torner J, Feinberg W, Mayberg M, Thies W. Guidelines for Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:1167–1174.[Full Text]

62. Broderick JP, Adams HP, Barsan W, Feinberg W, Feldmann E, Grotta J, Kase C, Krieger D, Mayberg M, Tilley B, Zabramski JM, Zuccarello M. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke.. 1999;30:905–915.[Full Text]

63. Qizilbash N, Lewington SL, Lopez-Arrieta JM. Corticosteroids for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000064.[Medline]

64. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587.[Medline]

65. Clark W, Wissman S, Albers GW, Jhamanda JH, Madden KP, Hamilton S, for the ATLANTIS Stroke Study Investigators. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (Alteplase) for ischemic stroke 3 to 5 hours after symptom onset: the ALANTIS study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:2019–2026.[Medline]

66. Andreotti F, Pasceri V, Hackett DR, Davies GJ, Haider AW, Maseri A. Preinfarction angina as a predictor of more rapid coronary thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:7–12.[Medline]

67. The MAST-I Collaborative Group. Thrombolytic and antithrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke: Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial—Italy (MAST-I). In: del Zoppo GJ, Mori E, Hacke W, eds. Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993:86–94.

68. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P, Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II) [see comments]. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251.[Medline]

69. Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial-Italy (MAST-I) Group. Randomised controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1995;346:1509–1514.[Medline]

70. Shahar E, McGovern PG. Trials of streptokinase in severe acute ischaemic stroke [letter]. Lancet.. 1995;345:578.

71. del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Rowley HA, Gent M, Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT) Investigators. PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke [see comments]. Stroke. 1998;29:4–11.[Abstract/Full Text]

72. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C PM, Ahuja A, Callahan F, Clark WM, Silver F, Rivera F, for the PROACT investigators. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:2003–2011.[Medline]

73. Wardlaw JM, del Zoppo G, Yamaguchi T. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000213.[Medline]

74. Clark WM, Albers GW, Madden KP, Hamilton S, thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke study investigators. The rtPA (alteplase) 0- to 6-hour acute stroke trial, part A (A0276g): results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Stroke. 2000;31:811–816.[Abstract/Full Text]

75. ISIS (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet. 1988;2:349–360.[Medline]

76. Gilles Geraud AB. Is anticoagulant therapy too frequently used in ischemic stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis. 1991;1(suppl 1):120–123.

77. Marsh EE III, Adams HP Jr, Biller J. Use of antithrombotic drugs in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a survey of neurologists in practice in the United States. Neurology. 1989;39:1631–1634.[Medline]

78. Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment. BMJ. 1988;296:320–331.[Medline]

79. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group. A comparison of two doses of aspirin (30 mg vs 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1261–1266.[Medline]

80. Barnett HJ. Aspirin in stroke prevention: an overview. Stroke. 1990;21(suppl IV):IV-40–IV-43.

81. Hass WK, Easton JD, Adams HP Jr, Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group. A randomized trial comparing ticlopidine hydrochloride with aspirin for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med.. 1989;321:501–507.[Medline]

82. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomized trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19,435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349:1569–1581.[Medline]

83. Chinese Acute Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. CAST: randomized placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349:1641–1649.[Medline]

84. Gubitz G, Sandercock P, Counsell C. Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000029.[Medline]

85. Gubitz G, Counsell C, Sandercock P, Signorini D. Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000024.[Medline]

86. Clark WM, Williams BJ, Sacco KA, Zweifler RM, Sabounjian LA, Gamman RE, for the Citicoline Stroke Study Group. A randomized efficacy trial of citicoline in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;31:2592–2597.

87. Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Dacey R, Diringer M, Haley EC, Heros RC, Sternau LL, Torner J, Adams HP Jr, Feinberg W, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1994;25:2315–2328.[Medline]

88. Allen GS, Ahn HS, Preziosi TJ, Battye R, Boone SC, Boone SC, Chou SN, Kelly DL, Weir BK, Crabbe RA, Lavik PJ, Rosenbloom SB, Dorsey FC, Ingram CR, Mellits DE, Bertsch LA, Boisvert DP, Hundley MB, Johnson RK, Strom JA, Transou CR. Cerebral arterial spasm: a controlled trial of nimodipine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:619–624.[Medline]

89. Neil-Dwyer G, Mee E, Dorrance D, Lowe D. Early intervention with nimodipine in subarachnoid haemorrhage. Eur Heart J. 1987;8(suppl K):41–47.

90. Peturk KC, West M, Mohr G, et al. Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patients: results of a multi-center double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Neursorug.. 1988;68:505–517.

91. Philippon J, Grob R, Dagreeou F. Prevention of vasospasm in subarachnoid haemorrhage: a controlled study with nimodipine. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986;82:110–114.

92. Pickard JD, Murray GD, Illingworth R. Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial. BMJ. 1989;298:636–642.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. R. Fulgham, T. J. Ingall, L. G. Stead, H. J. Cloft, E. F. M. Wijdicks, and K. D. Flemming
Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2004; 79(11): 1459 - 1469.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. L. Saver, C. Kidwell, M. Eckstein, S. Starkman, and for the FAST-MAG Pilot Trial Investigators
Prehospital Neuroprotective Therapy for Acute Stroke: Results of the Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium (FAST-MAG) Pilot Trial
Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e106 - e108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Lenzer, C. Warlow, J. L Saver, C. S Kidwell, and S. Starkman
Alteplase for stroke: money and optimistic claims buttress the "brain attack" campaign * Commentary: Who pays the guideline writers? * Commentary: Thrombolysis in stroke: it works!
BMJ, March 23, 2002; 324(7339): 723 - 729.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines