Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:890-897

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fateh-Moghadam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gawaz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fateh-Moghadam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gawaz, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Imaging

(Circulation. 2000;102:890.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Changes in Surface Expression of Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins and Progression of Heart Transplant Vasculopathy

Suzanne Fateh-Moghadam, MD; Wolfgang Bocksch, MD; Andreas Ruf, MD; Timm Dickfeld, MD; Michael Schartl, MD; Gisela Pogátsa-Murray, MD; Roland Hetzer, MD; Eckart Fleck, MD; Meinrad Gawaz, MD

From Innere Medizin, Kardiologie, Charité-Campus Virchow and Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin (S.F.-M., W.B., M.S., E.F.); Zentrum für Labormedizin, Mikrobiologie and Transfusionsmedizin, Klinikum Karlsruhe (A.R.); 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar and Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München (T.D., G.P.-M., M.G.); and Klinik für Herz-/Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Germany (R.H.).

Correspondence to Meinrad Gawaz, MD, 1. Medizinische Klinik Klinikum rechts der Isar and Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636 München, FRG. E-mail gawaz{at}dhm.mhn.de or to Wolfgang Bocksch, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Transplant vasculopathy is the main limiting factor of the long-term success of heart transplantation. We sought to establish the role of platelets in the development and progression of transplant vasculopathy.

Methods and Results—Platelet analysis and intracoronary ultrasound examination were performed in 78 heart transplant recipients. Quantitative intracoronary ultrasound was used to define the severity of disease at baseline (48.8±4.5 months after transplantation) and at 1-year follow-up. Platelet activation was assessed with the use of immunological surface markers of activation (ligand-induced binding site 1 [LIBS-1], P-selectin, GPIIb-IIIa) and flow cytometry. We found that LIBS-1 immunoreactivity was significantly increased in patients with diffuse disease when compared with focal transplant disease (median [quartile], 27[14, 64] versus 18[7.9, 47], P=0.04). In a logistic regression model, we found that LIBS-1 was an independent predictor for the presence and progression of diffuse transplant vasculopathy (P=0.04). Patients with enhanced LIBS-1 levels (>75% quartile) had a 3.3-fold increased relative risk (95% CI 1.8 and 18.9, P=0.002) for the presence of diffuse transplant vasculopathy. When a cutoff value of 16.5 for the level of LIBS-1 was used, patients had a 4.8-fold increased relative risk (95% CI 1.9 and 12.5, P<0.01) for the progression of transplant vasculopathy.

Conclusions—Enhanced platelet activation is strongly associated with the development and progression of transplant vasculopathy. Understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms might contribute to the development of treatment strategies to prevent transplant vasculopathy.


Key Words: vasculature • platelets • glycoproteins • transplantation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Transplant vasculopathy is the leading cause of late mortality and limits the long-term success of heart transplantation.1 2 3 Transplant vasculopathy is a diffuse and progressive thickening of the arterial intima that develops in the major and minor coronary arteries of transplanted heart allografts.2 The result is sudden and/or chronic progressive ischemic damage to the transplanted heart with subsequent functional organ failure.4 Similar phenomena exist between ordinary atherosclerosis and transplant vasculopathy, which includes the presence of a concentration of subendothelial inflammatory cells (monocytes/macrophages, T-lymphocytes), intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix reorganization.5 Transplant vasculopathy is diffuse and frequently involves long segments of the affected arteries. It is characterized by concentric intimal thickening,6 whereas ordinary atherosclerosis usually involves one part of the artery more heavily than other parts, the latter producing prominent eccentric lesions.7

In the past, numerous pathomechanisms have been thought to be involved in the development of transplant vasculopathy, which includes immune-mediated vascular injury, inflammation of the vascular endothelium, ischemia-reperfusion injury, cytomegalovirus infection, or metabolic risk factors.2 Although the role of platelets in the development of atherosclerosis has been well recognized, the pathophysiological alterations of platelets in the context of transplant vasculopathy have been poorly studied. Platelets contain a variety of proinflammatory and proliferative compounds that are released in the microenvironment of thrombus formation.8 Contact of platelets with the endothelium induces alterations in the adhesive and chemotactic properties of the endothelial cells that support monocyte adhesion and transmigration and thereby the early inflammatory mechanisms in the process of atherosclerotic changes within the vessel wall.9 10 11 12

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes of platelet membrane glycoproteins as immunological activation markers of circulating platelets in patients with transplant vasculopathy.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients and Study Design
A total of 78 consecutive patients, who underwent routine clinical follow-up after allograft heart transplantation, were entered into the study. The indications for heart transplantation were terminal congestive heart failure caused by idiopathic cardiomyopathy (n=57), primary pulmonary hypertension (n=3), ischemic heart disease (n=17), and congenital valve disease (n=1). Patients were treated with standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy that consisted of cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and azathioprine. Prospectively, we hypothesized that changes in platelet membrane glycoproteins, which occur in patients with transplant vasculopathy, are associated with the severity and progression of the disease. All patients (n=78) were evaluated by heart catheterization, coronary angiography, and quantitative intracoronary ultrasound at the commencement of the study, and 71% of the patients (n=55) were reevaluated after 1 year. The time from transplant to initial enrollment of all patients was 48.8±4.5 months (mean±SEM; range 12.3 to 56.3 months) (Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics

According to quantitative intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS), described below,13 we divided the study patients in 2 groups: group 1, diffuse, circumferential plaque formation, and group 2, focal or polyfocal plaque formation located at isolated sites with noncircumferential changes.

Blood samples were taken from the femoral artery before cardiac catheterization. With the use of a multiple-syringe sampling technique, the first 2 mL of blood was discarded. Thereafter, 2.5 mL of blood collected in EDTA was used for the determination of blood count, PlA polymorphism, and cyclosporine plasma levels. For flow cytometric analysis, 0.5 mL of blood was collected into a polypropylene syringe that contained 1.0 mL of a fixative that contained methacrolein (CyfixII).14 The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and all patients provided informed written consent.

Heart Catheterization and ICUS
After intracoronary administration of 0.2 mg nitroglycerin, an intravascular ultrasound catheter (Five-64, F/X Endosonics) was pushed into the left coronary artery, and catheter pullback was performed manually. For longitudinal orientation, septal or diagonal branches were used as anatomic landmarks. Qualitative and quantitative plaque analysis was done at the site of minimum lumen diameter for the left main coronary artery and for every left anterior descending (LAD) segment. Evaluation of plaque morphology was carried out following published guidelines on ICUS imaging.15

Because the conventional Stanford classification6 considers only the cross-sectional changes, we used the following classification,13 which also takes into account the longitudinal distribution of the plaque. Axial plaque distribution was classified as (1) "circumferential" if intimal thickening or plaque burden involved the total cross section of the vessel (Figure 1Down, top), and (2) as "noncircumferential" if >=10% of the cross section was free of plaque burden or intimal thickening (Figure 1Down, bottom).



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. ICUS images of patient after heart transplantation with diffuse (top) and focal (bottom) plaque formation. Right panels show cross-sectional image; left panels show longitudinal reconstruction. Depicted are representative images of patient with (bottom) diffuse plaque formation of the LAD (homogeneous, noncalcified, circumferential plaque formation [->] with continuous plaque formation in entire LAD in longitudinal reconstruction) and (top) with focal plaque formation of LAD (noncircumferential, homogeneous plaque formation without calcification [->] with proximal location in longitudinal reconstruction of LAD [->]).

Longitudinal plaque distribution was classified as focal if only 1 (focal) or more (polyfocal) discrete coronary lesions separated by nondiseased were found throughout the ICUS pullback (Figure 1Up, bottom) and as diffuse if continuous plaque formation that involved at least 1 complete coronary segment occurred (Figure 1Up, top). According to the guidelines of intravascular ultrasound,15 average plaque thickness, maximum plaque thickness (MPT), average plaque area, maximum plaque area, average intimal index, and maximum intimal index were calculated. Differences in plaque thickness within 1 year ({Delta}MPT=MPT2-MPT1) were calculated from MPT determined at time of the commencement of the study (MPT1) and at 1-year follow-up (MPT2). Disease progression was defined as an increase of >0.3 mm of MPT after 1 year at a precise anatomic site (Figure 2Down).16



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. ICUS images of identical cross sections at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Small side branch at 6 o’clock position serves as anatomic landmark. MPT ({leftrightarrow}) has increased from 1.1. to 1.7 mm.

Platelet Flow Cytometry and Analysis of PlA (GPIIIa) Polymorphism
Evaluation of surface expression of platelet membrane glycoproteins was performed with the use of specific monoclonal antibodies and 2-color whole-blood flow cytometry, as described in detail elsewhere.9 17 18 Specific monoclonal antibody binding was expressed as relative mean particle immunofluorescence (fluorescin) (CD41, ligand-induced binding site 1 [LIBS-1], generously provided by Dr Mark Ginsberg, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, Calif)9 19 or percentage of positive platelets (CD62P) of total platelet population and was used as a quantitative measurement of glycoprotein surface expression. Five thousand events were analyzed. MAb anti–CD-42 (clone SZ 2), anti-CD62P (clone CLB Thromb/6), and anti-CD41 (clone P2) were purchased from Immunotech. PlA genotypes were determined by allele-specific restriction enzyme analysis as described by Gawaz et al.18

Statistical Analysis
Results of flow cytometric parameters are reported as medians (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated. Differences between the 2 study groups were evaluated by means of appropriate unpaired nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test). A multiple logistic regression analysis that implemented an automatic stepwise selection algorithm for risk factor inclusion was performed to assess independent risk factors for transplant vasculopathy and the progression of the disease. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting progression of transplant vasculopathy was determined with an automatic algorithm (SPSS, Windows, version 9.0).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Characteristics
Between November 1996 and February 1999, we consecutively investigated 78 adult heart transplant recipients who underwent cardiac catheterization and intravascular ultrasound as a routine follow-up examination after transplantation (Tables 1Up and 2Down). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for minimum lumen diameter (in millimeters) and diffuse versus focal disease (left main coronary artery: 4.7±1.2 versus 4.3±1.3; proximal LAD: 3.2±0.9 versus 3.4±1.5; mid-LAD: 3±0.8 versus 3.2±1; distal LAD: 2.7±1 versus 2.8±1.1). According to published ICUS criteria,13 16 initially 43 patients had diffuse and 35 patients had focal transplant disease. At 1-year follow-up, paired intravascular ultrasound data were available for 55 (71%) of the 78 enrolled patients. The causes for dropout were death (n=1), acute myocardial infarction (n=1), refusal by the patient (n=12), and failure to attend the regular time interval of exactly 1 year ±1 month after the first examination (n=8). Eight patients during the observation period of 1 year had a cardiac event, which included death (n=1), myocardial infarction (n=1), and coronary balloon angioplasty for progression of the disease (n=7).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Angiographic and ICUS Characteristics

Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins and Transplant Vasculopathy
At the time of enrollment, activated fibrinogen receptor on circulating platelets, as assessed by LIBS-1 immunoreactivity, was significantly increased in patients with diffuse disease when compared with those with focal transplant disease (P=0.04) (Table 3Down and Figure 3Down). Similarly, in the group of patients with diffuse transplant vasculopathy, degranulation of {alpha}-granula (P-selectin surface expression) was significantly enhanced (P=0.04) (Table 3Down and Figure 3Down). No differences in surface density of GPIIb-IIIa (CD41) and GPIb (CD42) or platelet count were found between the 2 groups (Table 3Down). Furthermore, distribution of the platelet polymorphic allele PlA2 (GPIIIa) was not significantly different in both groups (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins and Transplant Vasculopathy



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. LIBS-1 and P-selectin surface expression in patients with transplant vasculopathy. Depicted are individual LIBS-1 (left) and P-selectin (right) values of patients with transplant vasculopathy characterized by focal or diffuse plaque formation. Horizontal lines indicate median values. Vertical lines show 25th and 75th percentiles.

LIBS-1 as Predictor of Diffuse Transplant Vasculopathy and Progression of Disease
Baseline patient and platelet variables were included in a logistic regression model to determine whether LIBS-1 is an independent variable that predicts the presence of diffuse transplant vasculopathy. As shown in Table 4Down, platelet surface expression of LIBS-1 was independently associated with diffuse transplant vasculopathy. For patients with enhanced LIBS-1 immunoreactivity (>75% quartile), there was a 3.3-fold increased relative risk (95% CI 1.8 and 18.9, P=0.002) of diffuse transplant vasculopathy when compared with patients with LIBS-1 values in the range <=75% quartile.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Multivariate Logistic Regression Modeling for Predictors of Diffuse Transplant Vasculopathy

In 55 of the 78 enrolled patients, we were able to calculate changes in MPT from follow-up paired intravascular ultrasound data at 1 year (Table 2Up). We found that LIBS-1 immunoreactivity correlated with plaque progression (increase of >=0.3 mm in MPT after 1 year) (r=0.681, P=0.002) (Figure 4Down). LIBS-1 immunoreactivity was significantly increased in patients with disease progression when compared with those with no disease progression (median [quartile], 10.1[5.0,15.7] versus 26.5 [15.5,47.5], P<0.01) (Figure 5Down). To test whether LIBS-1 is associated with plaque progression independent of baseline patient and platelet variables, we performed a linear regression analysis that included the parameters given in Table 5Down. Among the variables tested, only LIBS-1 immunoreactivity was associated independently with the progression of transplant vasculopathy. To predict progression for an individual heart transplant recipient by using the levels of LIBS-1 immunoreactivity, we calculated the ROC curve. The area under the ROC curve for the prediction of progression of transplant vasculopathy by LIBS-1 immunoreactivity was 0.811. The optimum cutoff value was 16.5 (Figure 5Down), with a sensitivity of 75.8%±5.76 (95% CI 64.5 and 87.1), specificity of 80%±5.39 (95% CI 69.4 and 90.6), positive predictive value of 86%±4.68 (95% CI 76.8 and 95.17), and negative predictive value of 66.7%±6.35 (95% CI 54.2 and 79.2). The prevalence of progression in this population was 60%. Thus, patients with LIBS-1 level >16.5 have a 4.8-fold relative risk (95% CI 1.2 and 12.5) of progression of transplant vasculopathy.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Correlation between progression of plaque thickness and LIBS-1 immunoreactivity.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. LIBS-1 surface expression and plaque progression of transplant vasculopathy. Depicted are individual LIBS-1 values of patients with or without progression of transplant vasculopathy within 1 year. Disease progression was defined as increase of >0.3 mm of MPT after 1 year at anatomically specific site. Horizontal lines indicate median values. Vertical lines show 25th and 75th percentiles.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Linear Regression Modeling for Predictors of Progression of Transplant Vasculopathy


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The major findings of this prospective study are as follows: (1) diffuse transplant vasculopathy, as assessed by intracoronary ultrasound, is associated with enhanced fibrinogen receptor activation (LIBS-1 expression) and degranulation of {alpha}-granula (P-selectin surface expression) of the circulating platelets; (2) progression of MPT within 1 year correlates with the activation of the platelet fibrinogen receptor; and (3) LIBS-1 surface expression on circulating platelets is a predictor of the progression of transplant vasculopathy independent of demographic variables and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. These findings imply that enhanced activation of circulating platelets in patients with heart transplants might contribute to the development and progression of transplant vasculopathy. If the activation of platelets induces atherogenesis, effective antiplatelet strategies may be beneficial for the long-term success of heart transplantation. However, platelet activation could serve as a passive indicator of transplant vasculopathy.

Transplant Vasculopathy, Atherosclerosis, and Platelets
In this study, we found that diffuse transplant vasculopathy, as assessed by the ICUS technique, is associated with increased surface expression of platelet membrane glycoproteins, which indicates activation of circulating platelets. This observation is concordant with previous studies20 that demonstrated an enhanced ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation.

In the early days of transplantation, the formation of platelet microthrombi and injury of the endothelium, followed by intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation, were suspected to be the cause of accelerated coronary graft disease.21 In our study, we found a significant association between the activated state (LIBS-1 immunoreactivity) of the platelet fibrinogen receptor GPIIb-IIIa, which plays a fundamental role in arterial thrombotic events, and platelet adhesion to the endothelium.22 23 24

In multivariate logistic regression analysis, we revealed that the association of LIBS-1 immunoreactivity with diffuse transplant vasculopathy is independent of other cardiovascular and transplant vasculopathy risk factors, which include hypercholesterolemia, plasma fibrinogen, diabetes, or smoking.

We also found that platelet degranulation (surface expression of P-selectin) is enhanced in patients with diffuse transplant vasculopathy, which implies that systemic release of proinflammatory (eg, platelet factor 4) and proliferative (eg, platelet-derived growth factor) compounds from activated platelets occurred. Thus, an enhanced release of platelet-derived mediators, either locally or systemically, might contribute to the acceleration and progression of transplant vasculopathy.

Pathophysiological Considerations
Intravascular examination of 78 heart transplant recipients revealed 43 patients with diffuse concentric lesions and 35 with focal eccentric lesions. Kapadia et al16 and Tuzcu et al,13 who performed serial intravascular ultrasound imaging with early baseline examination, detected focal eccentric lesions within a few weeks of transplantation, whereas the diffuse concentric lesions were only seen in the long-term follow-up. The authors believe that the diffuse changes probably represent the "real" transplant vasculopathy and regard the focal changes as donor-transmitted conventional atherosclerosis. Thus, the strong association between platelet LIBS-1 immunoreactivity and diffuse vasculopathy suggests that activation of platelets plays a fundamental part in the pathophysiology of transplant vasculopathy. Platelets have an important role in the onset of thrombosis, particularly in acute coronary syndromes.25 26 Less clear is whether platelets contribute to the origin and progression of atherosclerosis over an extended period of time.26 Functional alterations of endothelial cells are an essential feature of the initial lesion that leads to monocyte/macrophage and lymphocyte accumulation that marks the beginning of atherosclerosis.26 In this context, platelets may become involved in the process as early as the endothelial cells start losing their unique and essential ability to inhibit thrombogenic processes. The platelet fibrinogen receptor GPIIb-IIIa has been shown to mediate platelet/endothelium adhesion,23 24 which indicates that vascular lesions are not necessarily required for platelet attachment to the vessel wall. Thus, enhanced intermediate platelet deposition in coronary arteries of the transplanted heart may contribute to the localized release of various growth factors and cytokines, which cause the migration of monocytes and lymphocytes and the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and are early mechanisms that determine the progression of atherosclerosis.10 11 25 26 Experimental data show that activated platelets are able to induce secretion of the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, a central factor for the chemotaxis of monocytes to the vessel wall.10 11 Moreover, platelets induce enhanced surface expression of adhesion receptors such as intracellular adhesion molecule-1 on endothelium that mediate adhesion and transmigration of leukocytes.26

Study Limitations
Although we show in this study that platelet activation and transplant vasculopathy are strongly associated, we do not provide evidence that platelets are directly and actively involved in the pathophysiology of transplant vasculopathy. However, our findings show that LIBS-1 expression is a good predictor for the progression of transplant vasculopathy, which suggests a direct role of platelet activation in the disease. At present, we cannot provide conclusive data that address the cause of enhanced activation of circulating platelets in patients with transplant vasculopathy. Future serial ultrasound examination, combined with flow cytometric platelet evaluation, performed within weeks of transplantation, might contribute to the elucidation of this issue. Because cyclosporine has been shown to induce hyperresponsive platelets,27 28 29 one might speculate that the long-term administration of cyclosporine contributes to enhanced systemic platelet activation. Moreover, cyclosporine has been described as damaging endothelial cells and reducing the generation of prostacyclin, a major antiplatelet and vasodilator compound,30 in heart transplant recipients. In our study, we did not find a correlation between the observed LIBS-1 expression and the plasma cyclosporine level; thus, cyclosporine is unlikely to be the cause for the observed platelet activation in the patient group with the diffuse changes but might act synergistically with other hitherto unknown factors to stimulate platelet activation.

We used MPT measured at specific anatomic sites to monitor the progression of lesions because this is the most commonly reported parameter in the literature.16 Progression of plaque thickness measured at 1 site only does not represent the progression of the total plaque burden. For this purpose, serial ECG-gated plaque volume calculations of the target vessel are necessary.30

Therapeutic Implications
Although platelets are a good candidate for pharmacological intervention of platelet-mediated atherosclerosis, conventional antiplatelet strategies with a monotherapy of aspirin have been found to be ineffective in preventing experimental and clinical transplant vasculopathy.31 Only limited data with other antiplatelet drugs, such as thienopyridines, are available to date.32 Because platelets can be activated by multiple pathways, administration of a single antiplatelet drug does not substantially reduce platelet activation and degranulation, particularly when a variety of strong agonists might contribute to platelet activation in vivo. Thus, it is of interest whether a combination of antiplatelet drugs that target various platelet activation pathways (aspirin, clopidogrel, fibrinogen receptor antagonists) might be more effective in limiting platelet activation in heart transplant recipients. In this context, Candinas and coworkers33 demonstrated that a specific and selective platelet GPIIb-IIIa antagonist was effective in prolonging cardiac xenograft survival in a small-animal model. Further clinical studies are needed to show whether effective antiplatelet strategies are beneficial and safe for the long-term clinical course of patients after heart transplantation.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The study was supported in part by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ga 381/4-1) and Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung. The authors appreciate the excellent technical assistance of Kirsten Langenbrink and Antje Wallmuth. We thank Dipl Ing Axel Mohnhaupt, Institute of Medical Biometry of the Humboldt Universität Berlin, for his statistical advice. The authors are grateful to Dr Mark Ginsberg for generously supplying us with LIBS-1 monoclonal antibody (supported by grant HL-48728) and for helpful discussions. We would also like to thank Tonie Derwent for help in the preparation of the manuscript.


*    Footnotes
 
The first 2 authors contributed equally to this work.

Received September 13, 1999; revision received March 17, 2000; accepted March 22, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Gao SZ, Alderman EL, Schroeder JS, et al. Accelerated coronary vascular disease in heart transplant patients: coronary angiographic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:334–340.[Abstract]
  2. Weis M, von Scheidt W. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Circulation. 1997;96:2069–2077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Billingham ME. Histopathology of graft coronary disease. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:38–44.
  4. Young JB. Allograft vasculopathy: diagnosing the nemesis of heart transplantation. Circulation. 1999;100:458–460.[Free Full Text]
  5. Gordon D. Transplant arteriosclerosis. In: Fuster V, Ross R, Topol EJ, eds. Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:715–726.
  6. St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients: in vivo evidence of "angiographically silent" intimal thickening. Circulation. 1992;85:979–987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pucci AM, Forbes RDC, Billingham ME. Pathological features in long-term cardiac allograft. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1990;9:339–345.
  8. Sixma JJ. Interactions of blood platelets with the vessel wall. In: Bloom A, Forbes CD, eds. Hemostasis and Thrombosis. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:259–285.
  9. Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Schömig A. Evaluation of platelet membrane glycoproteins in coronary artery disease: consequences for diagnosis and therapy. Circulation. 1999;99:E1–E11.
  10. Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Dickfeld T, et al. Activated platelets induce monocyte chemotactic protein-1 secretion and surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on endothelial cells. Circulation. 1998;98:1164–1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Henn V, Slupsky JR, Graefe M, et al. CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells. Nature. 1998;391:591–594.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Gawaz M, Brand K, Dickfeld T, et al. Platelets alter chemotactic and adhesive properties of endothelial cells via an interleukin-1 mediated mechanism. Arteriosclerosis.. 2000;148:75–85.
  13. Tuzcu EM, De Franco AC, Hobbs R, et al. Prevalence and distribution of transplant coronary artery disease: insights from intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;14:S202–S207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ruf A, Pick M, Deutsch V, et al. The procoagulant activity of red cells from patients with ß-thalassemia major correlates with in-vivo platelet activation. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:51–56.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Di Mario C, Goerge G, Peters R, et al. Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound: study group on intracoronary imaging of the working group of coronary circulation and of the subgroup on intravascular ultrasound of the working group of echocardiography of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:207–229.[Free Full Text]
  16. Kapadia SR, Nissen SE, Ziada KM, et al. Development of transplantation vasculopathy and progression of donor-transmitted atherosclerosis: comparison by serial intravascular ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1998;98:2672–2678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Shattil SJ, Cunningham M, Hoxie JA. Detection of activated platelets in whole blood using activation-dependent monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry. Blood. 1987;70:307–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gawaz M, Ruf A, Neumann FJ, et al. Effect of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor antagonism on platelet membrane glycoproteins after coronary stent placement. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:994–1001.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ginsberg MH, Frelinger AL, Lam SCT, et al. Analysis of platelet aggregation disorders based on flow cytometric analysis of membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa with conformation-specific monoclonal antibodies. Blood. 1990;76:2017–2023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. De Lorgeril M, Dureau G, Boissonnat P, et al. Platelet function and composition in heart transplant recipients compared with nontransplanted coronary patients. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:222–230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lurie KG, Billingham ME, Jamieson SW, et al. Pathogenesis and prevention of graft arteriosclerosis in an experimental heart transplant model. Transplantation. 1981;31:41–47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Plow EF, Ginsberg MH. Cellular adhesion: GPIIb-IIIa as a prototypic adhesion receptor. In: Coller BS, ed. Progress in Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1989:117–156.
  23. Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Dickfeld T, et al. Vitronectin receptor ({alpha}(v)ß) mediates platelet adhesion to the luminal aspect of endothelial cells: implications for reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:1809–1818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bombeli T, Schwartz BR, Harlan JM. Adhesion of activated platelets to endothelial cells: evidence for a GPIIb-IIIa-dependent bridging mechanism and novel roles for endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), {alpha}vß3 integrin, and GPIb{alpha}. J Exp Med. 1998;187:329–339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon J, et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). N Engl J Med. 1992;326:242–250.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Grace AA, Barradas MA, Mikhailidis DP, et al. Cyclosporine A enhances platelet aggregation. Kidney Int. 1987;32:889–895.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Voss BL, Hamilton KK, Samara EN, et al. Cyclosporine suppression of endothelial prostacyclin generation. Transplantation. 1988;45:793–796.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Bordet JC, De Lorgeril M, Durbin S, et al. Evaluation of renal and systemic production of prostacyclin in cyclosporine-treated heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:486–491.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. von Birgelen C, Mintz GS, Nicosia A, et al. Electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound image acquisition after coronary stent deployment facilitates on-line 3-dimensional reconstruction and automated lumen quantification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:436–443.[Abstract]
  31. De Lorgeril M, Dureau G, Boissonnat P, et al. Increased platelet aggregation after heart transplantation: influence of aspirin. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991;10:600–603.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. De Lorgeril M, Boissonnat P, Dureau G, et al. Evaluation of ticlopidine, a novel inhibitor of platelet aggregation, in heart transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1993;55:1195–1196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Candinas D, Lesnikoski BA, Hancock WW, et al. Inhibition of platelet integrin GPIIb-IIIa prolongs survival of discordant cardiac xenografts. Transplantation. 1996;62:1–5.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. E. Hiemann, E. Wellnhofer, C. Knosalla, H. B. Lehmkuhl, J. Stein, R. Hetzer, and R. Meyer
Prognostic Impact of Microvasculopathy on Survival After Heart Transplantation: Evidence From 9713 Endomyocardial Biopsies
Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1274 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. Stoll, N. Bassler, C. E. Hagemeyer, S. U. Eisenhardt, Y. C. Chen, R. Schmidt, M. Schwarz, I. Ahrens, Y. Katagiri, B. Pannen, et al.
Targeting Ligand-Induced Binding Sites on GPIIb/IIIa via Single-Chain Antibody Allows Effective Anticoagulation Without Bleeding Time Prolongation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(5): 1206 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. Grothusen, S. Umbreen, I. Konrad, K. Stellos, C. Schulz, B. Schmidt, E. Kremmer, O. Teebken, S. Massberg, M. Luchtefeld, et al.
EXP3179 Inhibits Collagen-Dependent Platelet Activation via Glycoprotein Receptor-VI Independent of AT1-Receptor Antagonism: Potential Impact on Atherothrombosis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(5): 1184 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. N. Mitchell and P. Libby
Vascular Remodeling in Transplant Vasculopathy
Circ. Res., April 13, 2007; 100(7): 967 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Bigalke, S. Lindemann, R. Ehlers, P. Seizer, K. Daub, H. Langer, T. Schonberger, E. Kremmer, D. Siegel-Axel, A. E. May, et al.
Expression of platelet collagen receptor glycoprotein VI is associated with acute coronary syndrome
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2006; 27(18): 2165 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Abele, M. Weyand, M. Wollin, N. E. Hiemann, F. Harig, T. Fischlein, and S. M. Ensminger
Clopidogrel reduces the development of transplant arteriosclerosis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1161 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Fateh-Moghadam, Z. Li, S. Ersel, T. Reuter, P. Htun, U. Plockinger, W. Bocksch, R. Dietz, and M. Gawaz
Platelet Degranulation Is Associated With Progression of Intima-Media Thickness of the Common Carotid Artery in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1299 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Haseruck, W. Erl, D. Pandey, G. Tigyi, P. Ohlmann, C. Ravanat, C. Gachet, and W. Siess
The plaque lipid lysophosphatidic acid stimulates platelet activation and platelet-monocyte aggregate formation in whole blood: involvement of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors
Blood, April 1, 2004; 103(7): 2585 - 2592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Dickfeld, E. Lengyel, A. E May, S. Massberg, K. Brand, S. Page, C. Thielen, K. Langenbrink, and M. Gawaz
Transient interaction of activated platelets with endothelial cells induces expression of monocyte-chemoattractant protein-1 via a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediated pathway: Implications for atherogenesis
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2001; 49(1): 189 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fateh-Moghadam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gawaz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fateh-Moghadam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gawaz, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Imaging