(Circulation. 2000;102:677.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Departments of Physiology, Biochemistry (J.W.M.H.), and Cardiology (P.A.D., B.C.A.M.B., R.B.), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Correspondence to Rien van der Zee, MD, PhD, Reinier de Graaf Group, Department of Cardiology, Reinier de Graafweg 3-11, 2625 AD Delft, Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsMouse thoracic aorta segments were bathed in an organ chamber. Administration of nebivolol did not affect NO production. When nebivolol was allowed to metabolize in vivo in mice, addition of plasma of these mice caused a sustained 2-fold increase in NO release. Interestingly, coadministration of a selective ß2-adrenergic receptor antagonist (butoxamine) prevented the response. Immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis demonstrated the presence of ß2- but not ß1-adrenergic receptors on endothelial cells. In the absence of calcium, metabolized nebivolol failed to increase NO production, suggesting a role for calcium-dependent NO synthase. With digital fluorescence imaging, a rapid and sustained rise in endothelial cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration was observed after administration of metabolized nebivolol, which also was abrogated by butoxamine pretreatment.
ConclusionsIn vivo metabolized nebivolol increases vascular NO production. This phenomenon involves endothelial ß2-adrenergic receptor ligation, with a subsequent rise in endothelial free [Ca2+]i and endothelial NO synthasedependent NO production. This may be an important mechanism underlying the nebivolol-induced, NO-mediated arterial dilation in humans.
Key Words: nitric oxide endothelium receptors, adrenergic, beta calcium
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-receptorblocking effects (labetolol,
carvedilol), intrinsic sympathomimetic effects (pindolol), or class III
antiarrhythmic effects (sotalol).3 Nebivolol, a newly developed ß-adrenergic receptorblocking drug, is a racemic mixture of D- and L-enantiomers, of which D-nebivolol is considered to be a highly selective ß1-adrenergic receptor antagonist.4 In addition, nebivolol has been shown to cause vasodilatation in animals4 and humans.4 5 6 It has been suggested that this effect is mediated by increased nitric oxide (NO) production, because it can be abrogated by inhibitors of NO synthase (NOS).5 6 NO released by endothelial cells has been shown to be a key participant in numerous biological processes, serving the maintenance of vascular integrity; one of its main actions is induction of vascular relaxation.7 8
The present study was performed to explore whether nebivolol
indeed induces NO production and to obtain insight into the
mechanism underlying this enhanced NO production,6
if any. We hypothesized that not nebivolol itself but rather its
metabolites increase NO production, because pilot experiments
in our institute indicated that nebivolol itself does not induce NO
release. In vitro techniques were used to test the influence of plasma
metabolites formed in vivo on NO production and
endothelial Ca2+ concentration in
isolated vascular segments; because it is known that the stimulation of
adrenergic receptors and 5-HT serotonergic receptors can
activate endothelial constitutive (ec) NOS,
leading to NO release,9 10 we investigated the involvement
of both
- and ß-adrenergic receptors and
5-HT1A serotonergic receptors.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Use of Drugs and Mouse Plasma
The effects of a mixture of D- and
L-nebivolol (50/50 mixture; 1 µmol/L final bath
concentration; Menarini) and of metoprolol (1 µmol/L;
CIBA-Geigy), another commonly used ß1-selective
antagonist without indications of NO releaseinducing
activity, on vascular NO release and endothelial
cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration
([Ca2+]i) were assessed
in separate experiments. To test the hypothesis that not nebivolol
itself but rather its metabolites induce NO release and increase
endothelial
[Ca2+]i, 0.5 mL of
D- and L-nebivolol (50/50; 0.5 mg/mL) was
injected into the tail vein of mice. In separate experiments, the
effect of metabolites of metoprolol (0.5 mg/mL) was tested by the same
procedure (0.5 mL IV). In these experiments, in vivo drug
metabolization was allowed for 45 minutes. Then, anesthesia
was induced, the abdomen opened, and blood collected. Blood samples
were centrifuged (2 minutes, 12 000 rpm at 4°C;
centrifuge 5412, Eppendorf) to obtain plasma, which was stored
at 4°C for use in an NO or Ca2+ assay on the
same day. Plasma of noninjected mice treated similarly was used to test
the effects of plasma factors. In these experiments, plasma volume
constituted 3% of the total volume of the final bath solution.
Acetylcholine (1 µmol/L in NO assay; 0.1 mmol/L in
Ca2+ assay; Sigma) was administered to
investigate whether a normal response could be induced in
endothelium-intact aorta segments.
To study the involvement of endothelium, in some
experiments, endothelium-denuded aorta segments were
used. The role of NOS was investigated by use of a blocker of NO
synthesis
(NG-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester, L-NAME; 0.1 mmol/L; Sigma). Because ecNOS is
dependent on endothelial Ca2+ for
its activity,7 the role of Ca2+
was studied by bathing aorta segments in
CaCl2-free solution. Finally, to test the
contribution of vascular
- or ß-adrenergic receptors and 5-HT
serotonergic receptors to NO production, an
-adrenergic
receptor blocker (phentolamine; 10 µmol/L; CIBA-Geigy),
a ß2-adrenergic receptor antagonist
(butoxamine; 0.1 mmol/L; Sigma), or a 5-HT1A
antagonist (NAN-190; 1 µmol/L; ICN) was used. A
ß2-adrenergic receptor agonist (salbutamol;
10 µmol/L; Sigma) was administered to study a possible role for
ß2-adrenergic receptormediated NO
release.
Measurement of NO
NO was determined at different time points before and
after administration of the reagents to be tested (t= -5, 0, 2, 5, 10,
15, 20, and 25 minutes). NO production was quantified by the
Griess method, which was described extensively in an earlier
study.11 To correct for the differences in size of the
vascular segments, the NO production was standardized for
intimal surface area. The NO concentration ([NO]) per unit surface
area was expressed in (µmol/L)/m2, assuming
that the production of NO was equal across the
endothelium of the excised vascular segment.
Digital Fluorescence Imaging
ecNOS is dependent on the endothelial cytosolic
free Ca2+ concentration
([Ca2+]i) for its
activity.7 For measurement of
[Ca2+]i in
endothelial cells, segments of the thoracic aorta were
opened longitudinally and pinned onto a silicon disk. The vessel
segments were loaded with the calcium probe fura 2-AM (10
µmol/L; Molecular Probes). Subsequently, the silicon disk with the
aortic segment was placed in an aluminum organ chamber containing Krebs
solution, aerated with 95% O2/5%
CO2 at 37°C. The method used to measure
[Ca2+]i with a digital
fluorescence imaging system connected to an inverted microscope
was adapted from the method described earlier by Raat and
coworkers.12 Typically, 80% to 100% of the
endothelial cells responded after administration of a
test agent within each microscopic field (see Figure 3
). Because
calibration values differed per cell, data are presented as
340/380 ratios. To obtain an impression about absolute
[Ca2+]i, averaged 340/380
ratios of all cells in a field were translated into
[Ca2+]i by a calibration
according to Grynkiewicz.13 Calculated baseline
[Ca2+]i in the aorta
endothelial cells was, on average, 45 nmol/L.
|
Immunohistochemistry
To investigate the presence of ß1-
and/or ß2-adrenergic receptors, segments of the
mouse thoracic aorta were embedded in Tissue-Tek. Samples of mouse left
ventricular myocardium and brain were embedded
and used as positive controls for ß1- and
ß2-adrenergic receptors, respectively. Frozen
tissue sections were overlaid with rabbit polyclonal antimouse
ß1- or ß2-adrenergic
receptor antibodies (30 minutes at room temperature, 1:100 in 1%
BSA/0.1% Tris-HCl buffered saline; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For
negative control, the primary antibody was omitted.
Cell Culture Techniques
To investigate whether ß1- or
ß2-adrenergic receptor protein could be
detected in endothelial and smooth muscle cells, these
cells were cultured for use in Western blot analysis. Because
we, like many other groups, did not succeed in keeping mouse aorta
endothelial cells viable under culture conditions,
cells from rat heart endothelial cell line-50
(RHEC-50)14 were used. The cells were used for Western
blot analysis after the second passage. Smooth muscle cells
were derived from 3-mm mouse aortic segments from which the
endothelium was mechanically removed.
Western Blot Procedures
Cultured endothelial cells and smooth muscle
cells were lysed in a standard lysis buffer. Rabbit polyclonal
antimouse ß1- or
ß2-adrenergic receptor antibodies (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), diluted 1:1000 in PBS, were used as primary antibodies
and were applied for overnight incubation at 4°C. After several
washing procedures, the membranes were subjected to enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham).
Use of Mouse Hepatic Microsomes
To obtain direct evidence in favor of action via active
metabolites, we performed additional experiments using hepatic
microsomes. D,L-Nebivolol (0.5 mL; 50/50; 0.5
mg/mL) was incubated with freshly harvested hepatic microsomes from
male Swiss mice (n=3). Incubation was allowed for 45 minutes to obtain
liver metabolites of nebivolol. After incubation, hepatic microsomes
were centrifuged, and the supernatant was added directly to
RHEC-50 cells. NO production was quantified with a calibrated
porphyrinic NO sensor (World Precision Instruments) positioned on top
of a confluent layer of RHEC-50 cells.
Statistical Analysis
Values are given as mean±SEM. The data were evaluated with a
2-factorial (significance over time and significance of drug effect)
ANOVA for repeated measurements. Statistical significance was inferred
when P<0.05. In all experiments, n equals the number of
aortas, corresponding with the number of mice used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-blocker phentolamine or the 5-HT1A
antagonist NAN-190, however, had no effect (Figure 1D
|
Cytosolic Free Ca2+ Concentration
Figure 2
illustrates the
heterogeneity in response between single
endothelial cells within the same vascular segment and
shows the effect of metabolized nebivolol on
[Ca2+]i with and without
butoxamine pretreatment. In Figure 3
, responses in single endothelial cells are plotted. The
average reaction to the same substances is presented in the
Table
. Figure 3A
depicts
the effect of fresh nebivolol together with plasma from a noninjected
mouse: a short-lasting response with a maximum increase of
[Ca2+]i from 45 to 175
nmol/L. This effect could not be blocked by butoxamine. Administration
of 10 µmol/L nebivolol resulted in a similar short-lasting
response with a somewhat higher peak value (data not shown); 0.1
mmol/L nebivolol resulted in an even higher increase, but the applied
concentration appeared to be toxic and resulted in lysis of the cell
membrane with subsequent leakage of fura 2 (data not shown). Plasma
from nebivolol-injected mice caused a rapid and sustained increase in
[Ca2+]i from 45 to 65
nmol/L (Figure 3B
). Blockade of the adrenergic
ß2-receptors with butoxamine abrogated this
increase in [Ca2+]i
(Figure 3C
). As a positive control, acetylcholine was
administered (Figure 3D
).
|
|
Immunohistochemistry and Western Blotting
Both immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis
indicated that mice aortic vascular smooth muscle cells contained
mainly ß1-adrenergic receptors (Figure 4A
, Figure 5
). In contrast,
endothelial cells selectively express
ß2-adrenergic receptors (Figure 4C
, Figure 5
). Mouse myocardium was used as a positive
control for ß1-staining (Figure 4B
),
whereas the choroid plexus in mouse brain tissue was used as a positive
control for ß2-staining (Figure 4D
).
|
|
Hepatic Microsomes
After nebivolol had been incubated with mouse hepatic microsomes
for 45 minutes, addition of these nebivolol-incubates to 3 separate
dishes containing RHEC-50 cells resulted in a significant rise in NO
concentration in each of the dishes (Figure 6
). Baseline NO concentration was on
average 40 nmol/L, which increased to a peak value of 88 nmol/L after
administration of nebivolol-incubate. After the
endothelial cell monolayer had been washed, addition of
acetylcholine caused a significant increase in NO production,
from 50 to 98 nmol/L (Figure 6
). Addition of nebivolol itself to
RHEC-50 cells, however, had no effect.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The metabolism of nebivolol is complex, and many metabolites have been described.4 The results of the hepatic microsome experiments show that mouse liver cells metabolize nebivolol, during which process at least 1 substance is formed that is capable of activating NO production in endothelial cells. These findings strongly suggest that 1 or more active metabolite(s) of nebivolol is/are responsible for the observed effects of plasma from nebivolol-injected animals on endothelial NO release and [Ca2+]i. The alternative that a nebivolol/plasma complex is responsible for the observed effects can be ruled out by our observation that addition of nonmetabolized nebivolol together with plasma from noninjected mice to cultured endothelium does not lead to stimulation of NO release. The other possibility, that nebivolol releases some endogenous mediator with ß2-agonist activity (eg, epinephrine), is unlikely in the light of the present results.
The rise in NO production in isolated segments of mouse aorta
in response to metabolized nebivolol was prevented by mechanical
removal of the endothelium. Further evidence for the
exclusive role of endothelial cells in this response is
provided by the involvement of ß2-adrenergic
receptors, which are shown to be present on
endothelial cells and not on vascular smooth muscle
cells. The involvement of ß2-adrenergic
receptors is supported by our observations that the
ß2-adrenergic receptor antagonist
butoxamine prevented the rise in NO production in response to
metabolized nebivolol and that the
ß2-adrenergic receptor agonist salbutamol
induced a rise in NO production similar to the one induced by
metabolized nebivolol. Interestingly, Dawes et al15
recently showed vasodilator responses in the human forearm that were
mediated predominantly through ß2-adrenergic
receptors and were dependent on NO synthesis.
-Adrenergic receptors
are not involved in the vasodilating effect of metabolized nebivolol,
because phentolamine failed to affect the augmented NO
production induced by metabolized nebivolol. Administration of
phentolamine alone also did not affect NO production
(data not shown).
Recently, Kakoki et al10 observed that nebivolol induces NO-mediated vasorelaxation in isolated rat aorta, which could be blocked with a 5-HT1A antagonist. We show that NO production in response to metabolized nebivolol was completely blocked by butoxamine, a ß2-adrenergic receptor antagonist with no known affinity for 5-HT receptors,16 but not by the 5-HT1A antagonist NAN-190. This is in agreement with the results obtained in earlier studies showing that the documented affinity of nebivolol for the 5-HT1A receptor has no functional consequences.17 Moreover, in contrast to the results of Kakoki et al, Gao and coworkers18 found that the nebivolol-induced relaxation of isolated rings of canine left anterior descending coronary arteries was not affected by methysergide, a nonspecific blocker of 5-HT1A and other 5-HT serotonergic receptors.19
Metabolized nebivolol caused a small but significant increase in free
[Ca2+]i in
endothelial cells of
20 nmol/L. It cannot be
concluded from the present study whether the measured rise in free
[Ca2+]i is sufficient to
stimulate the activity of ecNOS. In this respect, it is interesting to
note that a relatively high concentration of acetylcholine was needed
to induce a measurable rise in endothelial free
[Ca2+]i. This may be the
consequence either of a relative insensitivity of the
fluorescence imaging method used to quantify free
[Ca2+]i or of the
stimulation of ecNOS in a calcium-independent way.20 The
first possibility could explain why the increase in free
[Ca2+]i as caused by
metabolized nebivolol or acetylcholine was relatively low in proportion
to their more pronounced effects on NO production. Regarding
the second possibility, it is interesting to note that metabolized
nebivolol was not able to induce a rise in NO release in the absence of
extracellular calcium. It may well be that both intracellular and
extracellular Ca2+ are necessary to stimulate
ecNOS. After all, it has been shown by other groups that the delayed
component contributing to the plateau phase of the elevated
[Ca2+]i is dependent on
Ca2+ influx from the extracellular space, whereas
the initial rise may be the result of release from intracellular
stores.21
In separate experiments, plasma of human volunteers on nebivolol 5 mg/d did not evoke a similar rise in NO production in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. The dose of nebivolol used in this study was much higher than the ones used in oral treatment in humans. One should realize, however, that the mouse aortic endothelium is only moderately sensitive to agonists, because relatively high concentrations of salbutamol and acetylcholine were needed to augment endothelial [Ca2+]i and NO production.
The clinical finding that endogenous NO appears to be involved in the acute arterial and venous dilation after local nebivolol infusion is not necessarily in disagreement with the observations in the present study.5 6 The dilating effect of nebivolol in the human forearm could be a result of nebivolol-induced peripheral arterial dilation,4 inducing shear stressrelated endothelium/NO-mediated dilation. The observation of Bowman et al5 that nebivolol induces limited vasodilation in hand veins is also not necessarily in disagreement with our observations in mouse aorta, because venous and arterial mechanisms of vasodilation are known to be different.22 However, the results of the present study do not exclude the possibility of local nebivolol metabolite production with subsequent NO release in the peripheral vasculature of the forearm.
The finding that metabolization of nebivolol provides a stimulatory ligand for vascular endothelial ß2-adrenergic receptors, which results in increased endothelial cell NO production in mice, may have several potential implications for the clinical use of this ß-blocker, provided that the mechanism described is representative of the human situation. Beneficial effects of third-generation ß-blocking drugs in hypertension and heart failure have been demonstrated.23 It has been established that reduced bioavailability of vascular NO is a key factor in endothelial dysfunction associated with these disorders.8 The results of the present study indicate that selective ß2-adrenergic receptormediated increase of endothelial NO production might become an additional therapeutic target in disorders associated with endothelial dysfunction and with preserved ß-receptormediated NO-dependent vasodilation.
In conclusion, the findings of the present study indicate that metabolized nebivolol induces a ß2-adrenergic receptormediated rise in endothelial [Ca2+]i and consequently, augmented NO production.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 17, 1999; revision received March 9, 2000; accepted March 10, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Heidenreich PA, Lee TT, Massie BM. Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:2734.
3. Prichard BN, Tomlinson B. The additional properties of beta adrenoceptor blocking drugs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8(suppl 4):S1S15.
4. Van de Water A, Janssens W, Van Nueten J, et al. Pharmacological and hemodynamic profile of nebivolol, a chemically novel, potent, and selective beta 1-adrenergic antagonist. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;11:552563.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Bowman AJ, Chen CP, Ford GA. Nitric oxide mediated venodilator effects of nebivolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;38:199204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Cockcroft JR, Chowienczyk PJ, Brett SE, et al.
Nebivolol vasodilates human forearm vasculature: evidence for an
L-arginine/NO-dependent mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther. 1995;274:10671071.
7. Moncada S, Palmer RMJ, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Quyyumi AA, et al. Selective
defect in nitric oxide synthesis may explain the impaired
endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with
essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998;97:851856.
9.
Ming Z, Parent R, Lavallee M.
ß2-Adrenergic dilation of resistance
coronary vessels involves KATP channels
and nitric oxide in conscious dogs. Circulation. 1997;95:15681576.
10.
Kakoki M, Hirata Y, Hayakawa H, et al. Effects of
vasodilatory ß-adrenoceptor antagonists on
endothelium-derived nitric oxide release in rat kidney.
Hypertension. 1999;33:467471.
11.
Van der Zee R, Murohara T, Luo Z, et al. Vascular
endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor
augments nitric oxide release from quiescent rabbit and human vascular
endothelium. Circulation. 1997;95:10301037.
12. Raat NJ, Wetzels GE, De Mey JG. Calcium-contraction relationship in rat mesenteric arterial smooth muscle: effects of exogenous and neurogenic noradrenaline. Pflugers Arch. 1998;436:262269.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of
Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved
fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:34403450.
14. Linssen MCJG, van Nieuwenhoven FA, Duijvestijn AM, et al. Continuous endothelial cell lines from adult rat heart. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1993;29A:611613.
15.
Dawes M, Chowienczyk PJ, Ritter JM. Effects of
inhibition of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway on
vasodilation caused by ß-adrenergic agonists in human forearm.
Circulation. 1997;95:22932297.
16. Costain DW, Green AR. Beta-adrenoceptor antagonists inhibit the behavioural responses of rats to increased brain 5-hydroxytryptamine. Br J Pharmacol. 1978;64:193200.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Janssens WJ, Xhonneux R, Janssen PAJ. Animal pharmacology of nebivolol. Drug Invest. 1991;3:1324.
18. Gao YS, Nagao T, Bond RA, et al. Nebivolol induces endothelium-dependent relaxations of canine coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17:964969.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Jörgensen H, Knigge U, Kjaer A, et al. Adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion in rats induced by stimulation with serotonergic compounds. J Neuroendocrinol. 1999;11:283290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Ferro A, Queen LR, Priest RM, et al. Activation of nitric oxide synthase by beta 2-adrenoceptors in human umbilical vein endothelium in vitro. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;126:18721880.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Dolor RJ, Hurwitz LM, Mirza Z, et al. Regulation of
extracellular calcium entry in endothelial cells: role
of intracellular calcium pool. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:C171C181.
22. Chalon S, Tejura B, Moreno H Jr, et al. Role of nitric oxide in isoprenaline and sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation in human hand veins. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47:9198.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Ruffolo RR, Feuerstein GZ, Ohlstein EH. Recent observations with beta-adrenoceptor blockade: beneficial effects in hypertension and heart failure. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:S9S14.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Munzel and T. Gori Nebivolol The Somewhat-Different beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blocker. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 13, 2009; 54(16): 1491 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gulcan Could Nebivolol be an Alternative Drug for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2009; 99(5): 459 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dal Negro Pulmonary effects of nebivolol Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2009; 3(4): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Balligand beta(3)-Adrenoceptor stimulation on top of beta(1)-adrenoceptor blockade "Stop or Encore?". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1539 - 1542. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Prisant Nebivolol: Pharmacologic Profile of an Ultraselective, Vasodilatory {beta}1-Blocker J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2008; 48(2): 225 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oelze, A. Daiber, R. P. Brandes, M. Hortmann, P. Wenzel, U. Hink, E. Schulz, H. Mollnau, A. von Sandersleben, A. L. Kleschyov, et al. Nebivolol Inhibits Superoxide Formation by NADPH Oxidase and Endothelial Dysfunction in Angiotensin II-Treated Rats Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 677 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Mason, L. Kalinowski, R. F. Jacob, A. M. Jacoby, and T. Malinski Nebivolol Reduces Nitroxidative Stress and Restores Nitric Oxide Bioavailability in Endothelium of Black Americans Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3795 - 3801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dessy, J. Saliez, P. Ghisdal, G. Daneau, I. I. Lobysheva, F. Frerart, C. Belge, K. Jnaoui, P. Noirhomme, O. Feron, et al. Endothelial {beta}3-Adrenoreceptors Mediate Nitric Oxide-Dependent Vasorelaxation of Coronary Microvessels in Response to the Third-Generation {beta}-Blocker Nebivolol Circulation, August 23, 2005; 112(8): 1198 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Edes, Z. Gasior, and K. Wita Effects of nebivolol on left ventricular function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure: results of the ENECA study Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2005; 7(4): 631 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. McEniery, M. Schmitt, A. Qasem, D. J. Webb, A. P. Avolio, I. B. Wilkinson, and J. R. Cockcroft Nebivolol Increases Arterial Distensibility In Vivo Hypertension, September 1, 2004; 44(3): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mukherjee, S. Baksi, R. A. Dart, S. Gollub, J. Lazar, C. Nair, D. Schroeder, and S. H. Woolf {beta}-Blockers With Vasodilatory Actions Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1621 - 1621. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kalinowski, L. W. Dobrucki, M. Szczepanska-Konkel, M. Jankowski, L. Martyniec, S. Angielski, and T. Malinski Third-Generation {beta}-Blockers Stimulate Nitric Oxide Release From Endothelial Cells Through ATP Efflux: A Novel Mechanism for Antihypertensive Action Circulation, June 3, 2003; 107(21): 2747 - 2752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mollnau, E. Schulz, A. Daiber, S. Baldus, M. Oelze, M. August, M. Wendt, U. Walter, C. Geiger, R. Agrawal, et al. Nebivolol Prevents Vascular NOS III Uncoupling in Experimental Hyperlipidemia and Inhibits NADPH Oxidase Activity in Inflammatory Cells Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2003; 23(4): 615 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Brehm, S. C. Wolf, S. Gorner, N. Buck-Muller, and T. Risler Effect of nebivolol on left ventricular function in patients with chronic heart failure: a pilot study Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2002; 4(6): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T Gewaltig and G. Kojda Vasoprotection by nitric oxide: mechanisms and therapeutic potential Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2002; 55(2): 250 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Iaccarino, E. Cipolletta, A. Fiorillo, M. Annecchiarico, M. Ciccarelli, V. Cimini, W. J. Koch, and B. Trimarco {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Gene Delivery to the Endothelium Corrects Impaired Adrenergic Vasorelaxation in Hypertension Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brugada, J. Brugada, and R. Brugada Dealing with biological variation in the Brugada syndrome Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2001; 22(24): 2231 - 2232. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jordan, J. Tank, M. Stoffels, G. Franke, N. J. Christensen, F. C. Luft, and M. Boschmann Interaction between {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Stimulation and Nitric Oxide Release on Tissue Perfusion and Metabolism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2803 - 2810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |