This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rockson, S. G. Articles by Woodburn, K. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rockson, S. G. Articles by Woodburn, K. W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Related Collections Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other Restenosis Other Treatment Other Research

(Circulation. 2000;102:591.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Current Perspective

Photoangioplasty

An Emerging Clinical Cardiovascular Role for Photodynamic Therapy

Stanley G. Rockson, MD; David P. Lorenz, MD; Wai-Fung Cheong, PhD; Kathryn W. Woodburn, PhD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (S.G.R., D.P.L.), and Pharmacyclics, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif (W.-F.C., K.W.W.).

Correspondence to Stanley G. Rockson, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, CVRC 287, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail rockson{at}leland.stanford.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 
Abstract—Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been studied and applied to various disease processes. The potential of PDT for selective destruction of target tissues is especially appealing in cardiovascular disease, in which other existing interventional tools are somewhat nonselective and carry substantial risk of damage to the normal arterial wall. Enthusiasm for photoangioplasty (PDT of vascular de novo atherosclerotic and, potentially, restenotic lesions) is fueled by more effective second-generation photosensitizers and technological advances in endovascular light delivery. This excitement revolves around at least 4 significant attributes of light-activated therapy: the putative selectivity and safety of photoangioplasty, the potential for atraumatic and effective debulking of atheromatous plaque through a biological mechanism, the postulated capability to reduce or inhibit restenosis, and the potential to treat long segments of abnormal vessel by simply using fibers with longer light-emitting regions. The available nonclinical data, coupled with the observations of a new phase I trial in human peripheral atherosclerosis, suggest a promising future for photoangioplasty in the treatment of primary atherosclerosis and prevention of restenosis.

Key Words: photodynamic therapy • photoangioplasty • atherosclerosis • restenosis

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emergent therapeutic modality for several disease processes. The salutary response is mediated by a photosensitizing drug, typically administered parenterally and selectively absorbed or retained within the tissues targeted for therapy.¹ Differential selectivity or retention promotes selective damage when the target tissue is exposed to light of an appropriate wavelength; the surrounding normal tissue, containing little or no drug, absorbs little light and is thus spared injury.^{1 2} Selectivity renders PDT particularly appealing in coronary artery disease, in which other catheter-based approaches are relatively nonselective and carry a substantial risk of damage to the normal arterial wall. Historically, PDT clinical research has focused primarily and successfully on treatment of cancer.² Recent advances in synthetic macrocyclic chemistry, laser technology, and endovascular light delivery systems have broadened the scope of PDT to include, among others, ophthalmic, urologic, immunological, and more recently atherosclerotic applications.^{3 4} PDT may have a viable role as a clinical inhibitor of restenosis and de novo disease.

	Mechanism of PDT Action

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 
The PDT response begins with a differential accumulation of a photosensitizer in the target tissue, the consequence of either selective uptake of the drug or of preferential retention caused by slower clearance from the abnormal tissue. Subsequently, the tissue is photo-illuminated at the wavelength that favors maximal absorption by the photosensitizer. The resultant photobiological response (direct, rapid cell apoptosis and delayed necrosis from neovascular damage) becomes maximal within several days.^{1 5 6 7} Throughout this process, the drug serves simply as a catalyst for energy transfer. Light absorption leads to the release of cytotoxic singlet oxygen, a highly reactive, oxidizing agent with very short diffusion distances (0.1 µm). Cell death is thus confined to those illuminated areas in which there is an adequate presence of the sensitizing drug.⁸

The physicochemical properties of the photosensitizing molecule will predicate preferential uptake by a target cellular population.⁵ In atherosclerosis, drug lipophilicity and the high lipid content of vascular plaque both appear to predicate selective uptake. Although these mechanisms have not been established with certainty,⁴ both passive and active processes have been identified for the uptake of hydrophobic photosensitizers into atheromatous plaque.⁹ Interestingly enough, the selective accumulation by atheromatous tissues of some lipophilic and hydrophilic agents is comparable.^{10 11} It is likely therefore that passive diffusion into the arterial wall from the vasa vasorum and from the lumen, as well as impaired endothelial permeability,^{12 13} can augment active transport mechanisms.

Whether in neoplasm or in atheroma, light of the appropriate wavelength is necessary to activate the drug. The light can originate from collimated sources (eg, lasers) or from diffuse illuminators (eg, high-power lamps and light-emitting diode panels).^{14 15} The emission wavelength is usually matched to the far-red absorption bandwidth of the photosensitizer. The light is then delivered to the treatment site either directly or via hollow wave guides or fibers terminating in optical configurations to achieve either a circumferential, segmental, or conical beam profile.¹⁶ Radially emitting fibers, with a variety of designs, have been used for endovascular PDT in animals,^{17 18 19} and in one case, a 2-patient clinical study.¹⁷ Another important advance in photoangioplasty is the development of compact, portable, and relatively inexpensive diode-based lasers to replace the older, large systems requiring special electrical and plumbing infrastructures; the latter are mostly dye lasers pumped by another laser (argon,^{19 20 21} KTP YAG) or pulse lasers (copper vapor).¹⁹

Severe cellular damage is noted in atheromatous areas after light exposure.⁷ However, there is demonstrable preservation of the intact elastic lamina and of normal collagen in the adventitia, suggesting that the functional integrity of the vessel is conserved.²² The absence of mural inflammation, despite extensive cell death, is consistent with the regression of atherosclerotic plaque through a hypothesized mechanism of apoptosis, although this has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. Paradoxically, a so-called "dark effect," ie, a therapeutic response to the drug in the absence of light, has also been described for the inhibitory effect on restenosis of at least one photosensitizer, a benzoporphyrin derivative. The therapeutic implication of this observation has not been delineated.

	Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 
Hematoporphyrin derivative (HpD) was the first of a number of photosensitizers with demonstrable, selective accumulation within atherosclerotic plaque.²³ Subsequent studies have underscored the affinity of porphyrin derivatives for diseased arterial wall in rabbits^{24 25 26} and miniswine.^{12 13} There is maximal drug concentration in the intimal surface layers, diminishing radially into the media.^{27 28} Both hematoporphyrin²⁹ and Photofrin,³⁰ a more purified derivative of HpD, also display in vitro preferential uptake by human plaque. Although Photofrin is available for clinical use in antineoplastic applications, its clinical performance in the PDT of atherosclerosis has been somewhat disappointing.¹⁷ Despite obvious, selective damage of the plaque and sparing of the underlying media, the lack of efficacy might be attributable to inadequate penetration of the 630-nm light through endoluminal blood. Clinical application is further hampered by the propensity of treated subjects to display prolonged cutaneous phototoxicity.⁴

Administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), a biochemical precursor for protoporphyrin IX, has been accomplished by topical, systemic, and local internal routes in a variety of malignant and dysplastic conditions.^{8 31} However, its administration can elicit hemodynamic changes (depression of systemic and pulmonary pressures and pulmonary resistance) that might limit its ultimate utility in cardiovascular applications.³²

Newer agents with selective localization, greater PDT efficiency, and minor, self-limited potential for cutaneous phototoxicity are now available.⁴ Phototherapeutic capacity in atherosclerosis has been described for a number of these molecules, including the phthalocyanines (photoactivated at 675 nm),^{11 33} chlorins (at 660 nm),³⁴ purpurins (at 663 nm),³⁵ and benzoporphyrin derivatives (at 690 nm).¹³ However, most of these agents require liposomal or intralipid formulation before administration.

Early PDT agents for cardiovascular disease were activated at wavelengths <700 nm, at which point blood and tissues substantially attenuate the delivery of light to target cells.³⁶ However, tissue optics dictate that for optimal photochemical response, the ideal photosensitizer should display maximal absorption in the range of 700 to 800 or 950 to 1100 nm.¹⁵ The recent renewal of interest in the therapeutic potential of cardiovascular PDT has been prompted largely by the availability of expanded macrocycles known as the texaphyrins. These drugs circumvent many of the physicochemical limitations of previously studied sensitizers. Texaphyrins are synthetic, water-soluble macrocycles with long wavelength-absorbing properties. They localize both in cancerous lesions and in atheromatous plaque.^{20 37 38} Incorporation of a diamagnetic lanthanide, lutetium, into the texaphyrin molecule yields a potent PDT agent that is activated by tissue-penetrating far-red light (732 nm).^{20 21} In addition, motexafin lutetium fluoresces at 750 nm (Figure 1); endogenous chromophores do not emit light at 750 nm. Hence, in vivo real-time imaging of target structures is feasible, thus facilitating clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. Similarly, the related, paramagnetic gadolinium texaphyrin might facilitate MRI of atheromatous vascular disease.³⁷

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Motexafin lutetium: chemical structure, absorbance, and fluorescence profiles.

Texaphyrins localize in and eradicate diseased tissues,²⁰ including atherosclerotic plaque (Figure 2).^{21 37} PDT with motexafin lutetium causes selective photodamage and thereby helps to reverse both diet-induced²⁰ and balloon-induced³⁹ atheromatous plaque in rabbits. The enhanced efficacy of texaphyrins may be attributable both to a more selective uptake and retention of the photosensitizing molecules and to the depth of light penetration achievable in blood and tissue at the longer 732-nm wavelength illumination.²⁰ Uptake of motexafin lutetium by the atheromatous plaque occurs in a ratio of 16:1 to 34:1 when diseased and normal segments of the arterial wall are contrasted.⁴⁰ One possible mechanism for this selective plaque uptake of texaphyrins is through plasma lipoprotein binding or modification.³⁷ Unlike HpD-based PDT,²¹ there is no evidence of microscopic damage to the arterial wall after PDT with motexafin lutetium.

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Spectral bioimaging of motexafin lutetium within atheromatous plaque compared with surrounding normal tissue. Hypercholesterolemic rabbit received intravenous dose of motexafin lutetium (10 µmol/kg). a, Aortic lumen was exposed at 24 hours after injection to fluorescence imaging. b, Spectral classification confirms selective accumulation and retention of photosensitizer within atheroma. c, Fluorescence emission profiles of atheroma and normal regions denoted in Figure 2a.

	Cardiovascular Applications of PDT

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 
In Vitro Experience
The extent of the short-term angiographic improvement plays a determining role in the durability of the clinical response to standard, percutaneous vascular interventions; however, restenosis still significantly impairs the potential for long-term clinical benefits for many patients.⁴¹ The identified biological determinants of the restenosis response appear to be, in principle, amenable to the mechanisms of phototherapy. These determinants include vascular remodeling, stimulation of the proliferative and migratory response of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and enhanced production of extracellular matrix.^{39 42} Furthermore, neutrophil and platelet activation has been demonstrated with angioplasty in balloon-injured arterial plaque.⁴³ Moreover, macrophages play an important role in the complex activation of SMCs after vascular injury.⁴⁴

Several studies have shown that PDT inhibits SMC growth and decreases the development of experimentally induced intimal hyperplasia response. The effects of PDT on the injury response seem to be rather complex. Photosensitization can accomplish a complete cellular eradication within the vascular wall without associated inflammation and proliferation, suggesting that PDT may induce changes in the extracellular matrix of the vascular wall.⁴⁵ In vitro, exposure to PDT eliminates detectable levels of basic fibroblast growth factor (ßFGF and FGF-2) in solution and significantly reduces the smooth muscle mitogenesis inducible by matrix-associated FGF-2.⁴⁵ In vivo, PDT of rat carotid arteries produces a loss of ßFGF staining compared with control, nontreated arteries. Furthermore, the effect of PDT on the release and activation of transforming growth factor-ß₁ has also been examined in vitro.⁴⁶ The data suggest that PDT may inhibit intimal hyperplasia through local inhibition of local cytokine release or activation.

In vitro investigations support the concept that PDT can favorably influence endothelial vascular biology. PDT with Photofrin II substantially impairs the growth of cultured SMCs derived from both atherosclerotic lesions and nonatherosclerotic arteries.^{30 47} The effect on SMCs obtained from atherosclerotic lesions (activated SMCs) is much greater than that seen in the cells obtained from the normal vascular wall. Similarly, studies of SMCs derived from saphenous vein grafts have shown significant inhibition of their growth after photosensitization.⁴⁸ In addition, PDT on bovine aortic endothelial cell preparations in vitro induces changes in extracellular matrix: SMC proliferation and migration are inhibited and endothelial cell proliferation is enhanced.⁴⁸ These PDT-induced vascular responses may benefit the process of vascular remodeling and reduce the likelihood of a restenosis response. The preferential uptake of the drug in atherosclerotic segments is further accentuated in the highly cellular regions of restenosis, suggesting that the selective cytotoxic effect could be applied to both the therapy and the prophylaxis of restenosis.⁴⁵

In Vivo Experience
A benefit after photosensitization with Photofrin in atherosclerotic rabbits has been reported,^{24 49} although others have shown only a slight to modest reduction in plaque burden.²⁷ The lack of marked therapeutic benefit with Photofrin-mediated PDT in atherosclerosis has been ascribed to the ability of blood to impair light transmission at 630 nm.¹² Thus, suboptimal light transmission would produce subtherapeutic activation of the sensitizer. Furthermore, safety considerations limit the maximum light dose that can be delivered. In experimental treatments of canine coronary arteries in vivo, light doses >200 J/cm² elicited angiographic spasm, histological necrosis, and even transmural injury.¹⁸ In this study, the cases of premature death were ascribed to the effects of coronary artery spasm, because only minor medial damage was seen in some of these specimens. In fact, even at high light doses, no embolization, vessel perforation, or aneurysmal dilatation was seen.

Efficient reduction of atherosclerotic plaque burden has also been demonstrated after PDT with motexafin lutetium. Histological analysis of the posttreatment specimens reveals selective reduction in plaque area in a hypercholesterolemic rabbit model (Figure 3),²¹ whereas in a balloon-injury model, a significant reduction in macrophage density within the treated lesions was observed.³⁹

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Three microscopic hematoxylin and eosin–stained cross sections of cholesterol-fed rabbit artery obtained 2 weeks after PDT with motexafin lutetium. Intima is extensively thickened and heavily laden with foam cells. Photoirradiated site (b) demonstrates substantial reduction of disease burden, while vascular regions above (a) and below (c) treatment zone remain heavily burdened with plaque.

The in vivo studies on intimal hyperplasia have yielded more universally promising results. For example, a substantial reduction in intimal hyperplasia has been shown in the rat carotid artery injury model with chloroaluminum-sulfonated phthalocyanine and 675-nm light at a fluence (the power density of light over time) of 100 J/cm².⁵⁰ No thermal injury was identified in the treated vascular segments. In most cases, inhibition of intimal hyperplasia correlates with histological absence of inflammatory and SMCs in the media. Similar benefits have been observed in other experimental model systems with Photofrin⁵¹ and ALA.⁸ PDT at the time of angioplasty leads to an acellular media despite regeneration of the endothelial lining.⁸ On the basis of the latter study, it would appear that it is not necessary to delay PDT after balloon injury to prevent the injury response of restenosis, because photoactivation at the time of angioplasty completely abolished the expected intimal hyperplasia after this injury. In addition, both short- and long-term benefits of PDT have been demonstrated.^{45 52}

In another study of PDT in a balloon-injured rodent arterial model, the media remained acellular for several weeks to months, and intimal hyperplasia did not occur.⁶ Although endothelial regeneration occurred by 2 weeks, SMCs failed to repopulate the media. During PDT, retraction of endothelial cells does allow adherence of neutrophils by their ß₂-integrin adhesion receptors to the subendothelial matrix, leading to the hypothesis that successful prevention of intimal hyperplasia by PDT relies in part on the presence of the neutrophil at the site of the lesion. Recently, Photofrin PDT was performed with continuous external laser irradiation in the rabbits either 1 (prevention) or 6 (treatment) weeks after balloon injury.⁵³ PDT was quite effective in the treatment of established intimal hyperplasia but did not prevent it. The authors concluded that refinements in dosimetry will be necessary to achieve long-term benefits.⁵³

The importance of the selection of the correct arterial region in the prevention of restenosis has been examined in the balloon-injured rat carotid artery.⁵⁴ The results of that study indicate that a hypercellular injury response in a treated lesion can originate from a remote source; consequently, successful elimination of restenosis by PDT may require inclusion of the entire injured artery in the treatment field, perhaps including a section of uninjured margin.

	Human Clinical Applications

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 
Photoangioplasty for arterial diseases, including de novo atherosclerosis and potentially restenosis, has reemerged because of promising new drugs and safer, less expensive optical devices. This approach has the intriguing potential for invoking separate but interrelated mechanisms of benefit from one therapeutic intervention: safe debulking of the atheroma through selective injury and destruction of the atherosclerotic material; inhibition of the restenosis process through an effect on macrophages, intimal hyperplasia, and the inhibition of SMC proliferation; and further inhibition of restenosis through a hypothesized dark effect of some photosensitizers.⁴

The clinical trials of motexafin lutetium (Antrin) were propelled by early preclinical indications of selective and efficacious resolution of plaque in rabbits. Clinical evaluation of motexafin lutetium is also ongoing in patients with recurrent breast cancer (Lutrin) and age-related macular degeneration (Optrin). In these latter studies, the drug has been well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose proved to be 5.5 mg/kg on the basis of elicitation of pain in the treatment field and dysesthesias in light-exposed areas.⁵⁵ Plasma pharmacokinetic data taken from these patients showed the drug to be cleared relatively quickly, exhibiting a T_1/2 and T_1/2ß of 0.32 and 12.9 hours, respectively. Early observations from a phase I trial in claudicants with peripheral arterial atherosclerosis suggest that the therapy is well tolerated and has the capacity to invoke a therapeutic response in these patients. In >90% of vessels treated to date, intravascular ultrasonography has confirmed measurable improvement in lumen cross-sectional area after Antrin photoangioplasty. The therapeutic changes are achieved without documented adverse vascular responses or any treatment-limiting phototoxicity. In these ongoing trials, doses of 1 to 5 mg/kg of Antrin have been administered intravenously before PDT, although preclinical data also support the feasibility of local endovascular drug delivery. This may ultimately be more clinically advantageous.^{39 56} Endovascular light is delivered through a cylindrical diffuser fiber, typically 24 hours after systemic, intravenous administration of Antrin. The fiber is positioned adjacent to the lesion of interest by percutaneous delivery through a standard 5F to 8F guiding catheter. Light treatment is sustained for 941 seconds to achieve 400-J/cm diffuser fiber over a 3-cm diffuser length fiber. A portable, relatively inexpensive 730-nm diode system facilitates these illumination requirements.

Of paramount interest may be the capacity of photoangioplasty to prevent the cellular responses of restenosis after conventional endovascular procedures. Future investigation will also determine the synergistic role of photoangioplasty when performed at the time of standard endovascular procedures. The available preclinical investigations, coupled with recent and continuing improvements in laser and fiberoptic technology, suggest a promising role for photoangioplasty in the future prevention and treatment of restenosis. Further clinical investigation must evaluate therapeutic outcomes and exclude a significant potential for coronary artery spasm in human applications. Although the time needed for full cytotoxic effect may limit applicability to short-term, primary therapeutic interventions, one can envision a potential role of photoangioplasty as an adjunct to the standard percutaneous techniques for revascularization. Additional, ripe clinical scenarios might include interventions for vulnerable plaque, long coronary lesions, diffuse and distal vascular disease, and stabilization of vulnerable plaque.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Mechanism of PDT Action Photosensitizing Drugs for PDT Cardiovascular Applications of... Human Clinical Applications References

 

1. Henderson B, Dougherty T. How does photodynamic therapy work? Photochem Photobiol. 1992;55:145–157.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
2. Dougherty T. Photosensitizers: therapy and detection of malignant tumors. Photochem Photobiol. 1987;45:879–889.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
3. Levy J. Photodynamic therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 1995;13:14–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
4. Vincent G. Photodynamic therapy of atherosclerosis and restenosis: a potentially exciting new treatment method. SPIE. 1994;2130:2–10.
   
5. Kessel D, Luo Y, Deng Y, et al. The role of subcellular localization in initiation of apoptosis by photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol. 1997;65:422–426.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
6. Sluiter W, de Vree W, Pietersma A, et al. Prevention of late lumen loss after coronary angioplasty by photodynamic therapy: role of activated neutrophils. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996;157:233–238.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
7. Reed M, Miller F, Wieman T, et al. The effect of photodynamic therapy on the microcirculation. J Surg Res. 1988;45:452–459.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
8. Nyamekye I, Anglin S, McEwan J, et al. Photodynamic therapy of normal and balloon-injured rat carotid arteries using 5-amino-levulinic acid. Circulation. 1995;91:417–425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
9. Delettre E, Brault D, Bruneval P, et al. In vitro uptake of dicarboxylic porphyrins by human atheroma: kinetic and analytical studies. Photochem Photobiol. 1991;54:239–246.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
10. Straight R, Vincent G, Hammond E, et al. Porphyrin retention and photodynamic treatment of diet induced atherosclerotic lesions in pigs. In: Jori G, Perria C, eds. Photodynamic Therapy of Tumors and Other Diseases. Padova, Italy: Libreria Progetto; 1986:350–352.
    
11. Eldar M, Yerushalmi Y, Kessler E, et al. Preferential uptake of a water soluble phthalocyanin by atherosclerotic plaques in rabbits. Atherosclerosis. 1990;84:135–139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
12. Vincent G, Mackie R, Orme E, et al. In vivo photosensitizer enhanced laser angioplasty in atherosclerotic Yucatan miniswine. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1990;8:59–61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
13. Hsiang Y, Crespo M, Richter A, et al. In vitro and in vivo uptake of benzoporphyrin derivative into human and miniswine atherosclerotic plaque. Photochem Photobiol. 1993;57:670–674.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
14. Wilson B. Light sources for photodynamic therapy. Photodynamic News. 1998;1:6–8.
    
15. Doiron D. Photophysics and instrumentation for porphyrin detection and activation. In: Doiron C, Gomer C, eds. Porphyrin Localization and Treatment of Tumors. New York, NY: Liss; 1984:41–73.
    
16. Van den Berg H. On the evolution of some endoscopic light delivery systems for photodynamic therapy. Endoscopy. 1998;30:393–407.
    
17. Spears J. Photosensitization. In: Isner J, Clarke R, eds. Cardiovascular Laser Therapy. New York NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1989:107–120.
    
18. Mackie RW, Vincent GM, Fox J, et al. In-vivo canine coronary artery laser irradiation: photodynamic therapy using dihematoporphyrin ether and 632 nm laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11:535–544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
19. Sobeh M, Greenwald S, Ham R, et al. Induction or prevention of intimal hyperplasia by photodynamic therapy in the porcine model. SPIE. 1995;2395:390–395.
    
20. Young SW, Woodburn KW, Wright M, et al. Lutetium texaphyrin (PCI-0123): a near-infrared, water-soluble photosensitizer. Photochem Photobiol. 1996;63:892–897.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
21. Woodburn K, Fan Q, Kessel D, et al. Phototherapy of cancer and atheromatous plaque with texaphyrins. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1996;14:343–348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
22. Grant W, Speight P, MacRobert A, et al. Photodynamic therapy of normal rat arteries after photosensitisation using disulphonated aluminum phthalocyanine and 5-aminolaevulinic acid. Br J Cancer. 1994;70:72–78.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
23. Spears J, Serur J, Shropshire D, et al. Fluorescence of experimental atheromatous plaques with hematoporphyrin derivative. J Clin Invest. 1983;71:395–399.
    
24. Neave V, Gianotta S, Hyman S, et al. Hematoporphyrin uptake in atherosclerotic plaques: therapeutic potentials. Neurosurgery. 1988;23:307–312.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
25. Pollock M, Eugene J, Hammer-Wilson M, et al. Photosensitization of experimental atheromas by porphyrins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:639–646.[Abstract]
    
26. Pernes JM, Brault D, Angel CY, et al. Comparative study of the selective uptake of hematoporphyrin derivative components into experimental atheromatous plaques: potential for laser angioplasty. J Intervent Radiol. 1988;3:3–8.
    
27. Litvack F, Grundfest WS, Forrester JS, et al. Effects of hematoporphyrin derivative and photodynamic therapy on atherosclerotic rabbits. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:667–671.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
28. Pagnan A, Scannapieco G, Pauletto P, et al. Haematoporphyrin and atherosclerosis in the broad-breasted white turkey: distribution and quantitation in thoracic and abdominal aorta. Int J Tissue React. 1989;11:93–99.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
29. Kessel D, Sykes E. Porphyrin accumulation by atheromatous plaques of the aorta. Photochem Photobiol. 1984;40:59–61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
30. Dartsch P, Ischinger T, Betz E. Responses of cultured smooth muscle cells from human nonatherosclerotic arteries and primary stenosing lesions after photoradiation: implication for photodynamic therapy of vascular stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1545–1550.[Abstract]
    
31. Kennedy J, Marcus S, Pottier R. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photodiagnosis (PD) using endogenous photosensitization induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA): mechanisms and clinical results. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1996;14:289–304.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
32. Herman M, Webber J, Fromm D, et al. Hemodynamic effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid in humans. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1998;43:61–65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
33. LaMuraglia G, Ortu P, Flotte T, et al. Chloroaluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine partitioning in normal and intimal hyperplastic artery in the rat: implications for photodynamic therapy. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1898–1905.[Abstract]
    
34. Hayashi J, Kuroiwa Y, Sato H, et al. Transadventitial localization of atheromatous plaques by fluorescence emission spectrum analysis of mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6. Card Res. 1993;27:1943–1947.
    
35. Narciso, H, Anderson S, DeHoratius S, et al. SnET₂ for the treatment of vascular disease: dose/response study in NZW rabbits. SPIE. 1995:2395:409–417.
    
36. Vincent G, Fox J, Charlton G, et al. Presence of blood significantly decreases transmission of 630 nm laser light. Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11:399–403.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
37. Woodburn K, Young S, Fan Q, et al. Selective uptake of texaphyrins by atheromatous plaque. SPIE. 1996;2671:62–71.
    
38. Sessler J, Hemmi G, Mody T, et al. Texaphyrins: synthesis and applications. Acc Chem Res. 1994;27:43–50.
    
39. Miller M, Kuntz R, Friedrich S, et al. Frequency and consequences of intimal hyperplasia in specimens retrieved by directional atherectomy of native primary coronary artery stenoses and subsequent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:652–658.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
40. Woodburn K, Qing F, Kessel D, et al. Photoeradication and imaging of atheromatous plaque with texaphyrins. SPIE. 1997;2970:44–50.
    
41. Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: time-related phenomenon: a quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2,3, and 4 months. Circulation. 1988;77:361–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
42. Simons M, Leclerc G, Safian R, et al. Relation between activated smooth-muscle cells in coronary-artery lesions and restenosis after atherectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:608–613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
43. Neumann F, Ott I, Gawaz M, et al. Neutrophil and platelet activation at balloon-injured coronary artery plaque in patients undergoing angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:819–824.[Abstract]
    
44. Hanke H, Hassenstein S, Ulmer A, et al. Accumulation of macrophages in the arterial vessel wall following experimental balloon angioplasty. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:691–698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
45. LaMuraglia G, Adili F, Karp S, et al. Photodynamic therapy inactivates extracellular matrix-basic fibroblast growth factor: insights to its effect on the vascular wall. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:294–301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
46. Statius van Eps R, LaMuraglia G. Photodynamic therapy inhibits transforming growth factor beta. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:1044–1052.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
47. Dartsch P, Ischinger T, Betz E. Differential effect of Photofrin II on growth of human smooth muscle cells from non atherosclerotic arteries and atheromatous plaques in vitro. Atherosclerosis. 1990;10:616–624.
    
48. Adili F, Statius van Eps R, Karp S, et al. Differential modulation of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell function by photodynamic therapy of extracellular matrix: novel insights into radical-mediated prevention of intimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:698–705.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
49. Tang G, Hyman S, Schneider J, et al. Application of photodynamic therapy to the treatment of atherosclerotic plaques. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:438–443.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
50. Ortu P, LaMuraglia G, Roberts G, et al. Photodynamic therapy of arteries: a novel approach for treatment of experimental intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 1992;85:1189–1196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
51. Eton D, Colburn M, Shim V, et al. Inhibition of intimal hyperplasia by photodynamic therapy using Photofrin. J Surg Res. 1992;53:558–562.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
52. Gonschior P, Gerheuser F, Fleuchaus M, et al. Local photodynamic therapy reduces tissue hyperplasia in an experimental restenosis model. Photochem Photobiol. 1996;64:758–763.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
53. Eton D, Shim V, Maibenco TA, et al. Cytotoxic effect of photodynamic therapy with Photofrin II on intimal hyperplasia. Ann Vasc Surg. 1996;10:273–282.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
54. Statius van Eps R, ChandraSekar N, Hasan T, et al. Importance of the treatment field for the application of vascular photodynamic therapy to inhibit intimal hyperplasia. Photochem Photobiol. 1998;67:337–342.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
55. Renschler MF, Yuen AR, Panella TJ, et al. Photodynamic therapy trials with motexafin lutetium (Lu-Tex) in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer. SPIE. 1998;3247:35–39.
    
56. Gonschior P, Erdemci F, Gerheuser F, et al. Selective hematoporphyrin (HMD) application in arterial vessels using a porous balloon catheter results in equivalent levels as compared to high-dose systemic administration [in German]. Z Kardiol. 1991;80:738–745.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R Waksman, I M Leitch, J Roessler, H Yazdi, R Seabron, F Tio, R W Scott, R I Grove, S Rychnovsky, B Robinson, et al. Intracoronary photodynamic therapy reduces neointimal growth without suppressing re-endothelialisation in a porcine model Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1138 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Cotton A Review of the Principles and Use of Lasers in Lower Limb Problems International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 133 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. R. Bijsterveld, R. J. G. Peters, S. A. Murphy, P. J. L. M. Bernink, J. G. P. Tijssen, M. Cohen, and TIMI 11B/ESSENCE Study Groups Recurrent cardiac ischemic events early after discontinuation of short-term heparin treatment in acute coronary syndromes: Results from the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B and efficacy and safety of subcutaneous enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave coronary events (ESSENCE) studies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 17, 2003; 42(12): 2083 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Kereiakes, A. M. Szyniszewski, D. Wahr, H. C. Herrmann, D. I. Simon, C. Rogers, P. Kramer, W. Shear, A. C. Yeung, K. A. Shunk, et al. Phase I Drug and Light Dose-Escalation Trial of Motexafin Lutetium and Far Red Light Activation (Phototherapy) in Subjects With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Stent Deployment: Procedural and Long-Term Results Circulation, September 16, 2003; 108(11): 1310 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A Thompson and S. N Oesterle Biointerventional cardiology: the future interface of interventional cardiovascular medicine and bioengineering Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2002; 7(2): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. R. Bijsterveld, A. H. Moons, J. C. M. Meijers, J. G. P. Tijssen, H. R. Buller, M. Levi, and R. J. G. Peters Rebound thrombin generation after heparin therapy in unstable angina: A randomized comparison between unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 811 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Arakawa, K. Hagisawa, H. Kusano, S. Yoneyama, A. Kurita, T. Arai, M. Kikuchi, I. Sakata, S.-i. Umenura, and F. Ohsuzu Sonodynamic Therapy Decreased Neointimal Hyperplasia After Stenting in the Rabbit Iliac Artery Circulation, January 15, 2002; 105(2): 149 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Granville, B. A. Cassidy, D. O. Ruehlmann, J. C. Choy, C. Brenner, G. Kroemer, C. van Breemen, P. Margaron, D. W. Hunt, and B. M. McManus Mitochondrial Release of Apoptosis-Inducing Factor and Cytochrome c During Smooth Muscle Cell Apoptosis Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2001; 159(1): 305 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Chen, K. W. Woodburn, C. Shi, D. C. Adelman, C. Rogers, and D. I. Simon Photodynamic Therapy With Motexafin Lutetium Induces Redox-Sensitive Apoptosis of Vascular Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(5): 759 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Stief Is Singlet Oxygen Antiatherosclerotic? Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2001; 158(2): 781 - 782. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Rockson, P. Kramer, M. Razavi, A. Szuba, S. Filardo, P. Fitzgerald, J. P. Cooke, S. Yousuf, A. R. DeVault, M. F. Renschler, et al. Photoangioplasty for Human Peripheral Atherosclerosis : Results of a Phase I Trial of Photodynamic Therapy With Motexafin Lutetium (Antrin) Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2322 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Villard, M. D. Feldman, J. Kim, T. E. Milner, and G. L. Freeman Use of a Blood Substitute to Determine Instantaneous Murine Right Ventricular Thickening With Optical Coherence Tomography Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1843 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rockson, S. G. Articles by Woodburn, K. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rockson, S. G. Articles by Woodburn, K. W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Related Collections Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other Restenosis Other Treatment Other Research