(Circulation. 2000;102:399.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Cardiology, Shiga Medical Center for Adults, Shiga, Japan (H.T., E.K., K.K, A.K., S.M., H.K., T.T., S.M., H.U.), and Igaki Medical Planning Co, Ltd, Kyoto, Japan (K.I.).
Correspondence to Hideo Tamai, MD, Department of Cardiology, Shiga Medical Center for Adults, 5-4-30, Moriyama, Moriyama, Shiga, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsFifteen patients electively underwent PLLA Igaki-Tamai stent implantation for coronary artery stenoses. The Igaki-Tamai stent is made of a PLLA monopolymer, has a thickness of 0.17 mm, and has a zigzag helical coil pattern. A balloon-expandable covered sheath system was used, and the stent expanded by itself to its original size with an adequate temperature. A total of 25 stents were successfully implanted in 19 lesions in 15 patients, and angiographic success was achieved in all procedures. No stent thrombosis and no major cardiac event occurred within 30 days. Coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound were serially performed 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after the procedure. Angiographically, both the restenosis rate and target lesion revascularization rate per lesion were 10.5%; the rates per patient were 6.7% at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound findings revealed no significant stent recoil at 1 day, and they revealed stent expansion at follow-up. No major cardiac event, except for repeat angioplasty, developed within 6 months.
ConclusionsOur preliminary experience suggests that coronary PLLA biodegradable stents are feasible, safe, and effective in humans. Long-term follow-up with more patients will be required to validate the long-term efficacy of PLLA stents.
Key Words: angioplasty stents coronary disease
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intimal dissections that are tacked back in place are likely to heal rapidly. Restenosis commonly occurs within 3 to 6 months after coronary intervention, and it rarely occurs thereafter.5 6 7 Therefore, the clinical need for stent scaffolding is limited after this period. Considering the short-term need and the potential for long-term complications with metallic stents, stents made of biodegradable materials may be an ideal alternative. A biodegradable stent can also be useful for the local administration of pharmacological agents directly to the site of PTCA to prevent late restenosis. Zidar et al4 reported a minimal inflammatory reaction and minimal neointimal hyperplasia with the use of poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) stents in canine femoral arteries. Regarding coronary stenting, Van der Giessen et al8 reported a marked inflammatory response after the implantation of 5 different polymer-loaded stents (polyglycolic acid/polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polyhydroxybutyrate valerate, polyorthoester, and polyethyleneoxide/polybutylene terephthalate) in a porcine coronary model. Although the biocompatibility of polymer stents in animal studies has been controversial, some reports suggest that high-molecular-weight PLLA is biocompatible in porcine coronary models.9 10 We report our preliminary experience of PLLA stent implantation in human coronary arteries.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Deployment of the stent is currently done with a balloon-expandable covered sheath system through an 8 French guiding catheter. Our preliminary study showed the PLLA stent expanded by itself to its original size in 0.2 seconds when heated to 70°C, in 13 seconds at 50°C, and in 20 minutes at 37°C. The stent delivery balloon inflation is performed with a heated dye at 80°C (almost 50°C at the stent site, as estimated by the in vitro experiment) using a 30-second inflation at 6 to 14 atm. This temperature ensures adequate stent expansion within 30 seconds and may minimize vessel injury caused by a heated balloon. The stent continues to expand gradually to its original size after deployment in vivo. When the stent is implanted in a vessel smaller than that of the unconstrained stent diameter, the residual radial force in the prosthesis will tend to dilate the artery. Dilatation will continue until equilibrium is attained between the circumferential elastic resistance of the arterial wall and the dilating force of the PLLA stent.
Patient Population
A protocol for implants in humans was approved by the hospital
ethics committee, and written informed consent (according to the
Helsinki Declaration) was obtained from all patients before PLLA stent
implantation. The indications for stent implantation were (1) the
prevention of restenosis in a de novo lesion, (2)
restenosis of a major coronary artery after previous
balloon angioplasty, and (3) suboptimal results after balloon
dilatation.
Implants
A total of 25 stents were implanted in 19 lesions in 15 patients
during 17 procedures. All stent implantations were elective. All
patients received 10 000 U of intravenous heparin at the
beginning of the procedure. Patients also received
nifedipine, nitroglycerin, and dextran
during the procedure. Before stent implantation, the lesions were
dilated by optimally sized balloons or debulked by directional
atherectomy (n=2) or rotational atherectomy (n=2) as needed. After
pretreatment, the balloon catheter was exchanged for the stent delivery
system over a 0.014-inch (0.036-cm) guidewire. The diameter of the
stent was chosen visually to be 10% to 20% greater than the reference
vessel diameter. Multiple stenting was performed, depending on lesion
length, to cover the entire lesion. The stent delivery balloon
inflation was performed with a heated dye at 80°C. A 30-second
inflation at 9 to 14 atm was repeated to obtain optimal results.
Postdilatation, higher balloon pressure was used in cases of inadequate
stent expansion. The maximum inflation pressure used was 10.8±1.5
atm.
According to local practice, intravenous heparin
(
10 000 to 15 000 U/day) was continued postoperatively for 3 days.
Poststent medical management included ticlopidine (200 mg/day for 1
month; this is the usual dose in Japan) and aspirin (81 mg/day for 6
months). Calcium antagonists and nitrates were also
administered if needed.
Quantitative Coronary Angiography Analysis
Coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
were performed before, immediately after, 1 day after, and 3 and 6
months after the procedure. Quantitative coronary angiography
(QCA) was analyzed using the Cardiovascular
Measurement System (Medical Imaging Systems), referenced to the known
diameter of the angiographic catheter. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD)
of the treated coronary segments, the reference diameter, and
the percent diameter stenosis on the baseline angiogram were
determined in the view that demonstrated the lesion to be most severe
and not foreshortened. Baseline and follow-up
cineangiograms were evaluated in the same view. The
procedure was considered successful if residual stenosis <50%
with TIMI grade 3 flow was achieved. Angiographic restenosis
was defined as a follow-up diameter stenosis
50%.
Quantitative IVUS Analysis
The IVUS system (Boston Scientific Corporation) uses a 40-MHz
transducer with a 2.6-French monorail imaging sheath. After the IVUS
catheter was passed into and beyond the lesion, a motorized pull-back
with a constant speed of 0.5 mm/s was started to obtain IVUS
imaging. To evaluate the self-expanding ability of PLLA stents, 5
segments were identified and analyzed: 3 were within the stent
and 2 were in the reference segments proximal and distal to the stent.
The 3 segments within the stent were the proximal edge of the
stent, the central body of stent, and the distal edge of the stent. The
stent and lumen cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured, and the
results were averaged among the 3 segments. A quantitative IVUS
analysis was performed with the Manual Measure computer system
(Goodman Co).
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD.
Univariate analysis was performed with the paired
t test for continuous variables. P<0.05 was
considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The mean reference vessel diameter was 2.85 mm (range, 2.12 to
3.41 mm), and the mean lesion length was 13.4 mm (range, 6.4
to 26.9 mm) by QCA (Table 2
). The
percent diameter stenosis decreased from 64% before stenting
to 12% after stenting. The MLD increased from 1.02 mm before
stenting to 2.59 mm after stenting. The percentage of acute stent
recoil, which was defined as (maximal inflated balloon diameter-final
MLD)/maximal inflated balloon diameterx100, was 22±7% by QCA.
|
At the 1-day angiographic follow-up, the percent diameter
stenosis was 13% and the MLD was 2.58 mm. One-day
angiographic follow-up revealed no further recoil of the stented
segment compared with that immediately after stenting (mean recoil,
-3±9%). IVUS findings also showed that no significant difference
existed in stent CSA immediately after stenting and at 1 day (7.42
versus 7.37 mm2; Table 3
).
|
No stent thrombosis and no major cardiac events (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and repeat PTCA or CABG) developed within 30 days. Two patients showed a mild creatine kinase elevation (>2x but <3x upper normal limit) after debulking procedures. All patients were discharged and followed-up clinically and angiographically for >6 months. No deaths, myocardial infarctions, or CABGs occurred in any of the 15 patients within 6 months. Only one patient underwent repeat PTCA (2 lesions were successfully dilated).
Follow-up coronary angiograms suitable for QCA were obtained in
all 15 patients within 6 months. The mean MLD at 3 months was 1.88
mm, and the mean percent diameter stenosis was 33%. At 6
months, the mean MLD was 1.84 mm and the mean percent diameter
stenosis was 33% (Table 2
). The angiographic
restenosis rate per lesion was 10.5% (2 of 19), and that per
patient was 6.7% (1 of 15) at 3 months (Table 4
). The 3-month
target lesion revascularization rate per lesion was
5.3% (1 of 19), and the per-patient rate was 6.7% (1 of 15). At 6
months, both the angiographic restenosis rate and the target
lesion revascularization rate per lesion were
10.5% (2 of 19), and these rates per patient were 6.7% (1 of 15).
Finally, the loss index, which was defined as late loss divided by
initial gain, was 0.44 at 3 months and 0.48 at 6 months.
|
The 3-month IVUS record for one non-restenotic lesion was
missing. One restenotic lesion was treated by repeat
angioplasty at 3 months and it was not available for the
analysis at 6 months. Therefore, IVUS imaging was
analyzed in 18 lesions at 3 months and in 18 lesions at 6
months. IVUS showed the presence of stent struts at 6 months. The mean
stent CSA tended to be larger both at 3 months and 6 months than
immediately after stenting (8.18 and 8.13
mm2 versus 7.42 mm2;
P=0.086 and 0.091); arteries also tended to have a mild
layer of neointimal hyperplasia at these follow-up times
(2.51 and 2.50 mm2, respectively; Table 3
). The mean stent CSA was similar at 3
and 6 months (8.18 and 8.13 mm2;
P=0.30). This difference suggests that the Igaki-Tamai stent
continues to expand for
3 months. Lumen CSA was similar at 3 and 6
months (5.67 mm2 versus 5.63
mm2; P=0.15), and
neointimal area was also similar (2.51
mm2 versus 2.50 mm2;
P=0.65). This result may imply that the Igaki-Tamai stent
does not significantly stimulate intimal hyperplasia within the stent
between 3 and 6 months after the procedure.
Serial coronary angiograms of a representative
case are shown in Figure 2
. The percent
diameter stenosis was 30% immediately after stenting, 20% at
1 day, 17% at 3 months, and 16% at 6 months. Serial IVUS findings of
the case are shown in Figure 3
. Stent CSA
was 7.60 mm2 immediately after stenting,
8.32 mm2 at 1 day, 10.95
mm2 at 3 months, and 9.78
mm2 at 6 months. Neointimal area was
3.70 mm2 at 3 months and 3.82
mm2 at 6 months, and no restenosis
occurred in this case.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For synthetic polymers to be used as stents, their biocompatibility must be ensured. Previous reports have suggested that tissue incompatibility may be a major obstacle in the development of polymeric materials for intracoronary stents.8 11 One report showed a reactive inflammatory response after metallic stent implantation in the porcine coronary artery.12 Various degrees of inflammatory responses have been reported with a number of biodegradable polymers in the porcine coronary artery model8 11 ; however, Lincoff et al9 found that high-molecular-weight PLLA was well tolerated in the porcine coronary model. We also reported the biocompatibility of the PLLA drug delivery stent with a high-molecular-weight, knitted design in porcine coronary arteries.10 In the previous study,10 we noted the neointimal formation caused by PLLA stents. However, the degree of neointimal formation was less than that seen in a previous report by Van der Giessen et al,8 and less inflammatory response was noted.
Thrombotic occlusion of polymeric stents have been reported in animal experiments.4 8 9 Zidar et al4 reported reduced platelet adherence and reduced thrombogenicity of the PLLA stent compared with slotted-tube stainless steel metallic stents in vitro. This property may be one advantage of PLLA stents for clinical use. In the present study, no PLLA stent thrombosis occurred under the aspirin and ticlopidine regimen.
To reduce vessel wall injury by stent implantation, we changed the stent design from knitted to coil using the same polymer, because our preliminary study showed that the knitted polymer stents injured the vessel wall more severely on implantation because of the uneven thickness of the stent struts (this study was done in porcine coronary arteries). In our animal experiment, 14 new PLLA coil stents used in the current study were implanted in 6 pigs, and no stent thrombosis and no late restenosis were recorded within 6 weeks.13 No significant neointimal hyperplasia within PLLA coil stents was found in this study compared with 9 Palmaz-Shatz half-stents in 9 pigs. PLLA coil stents also showed biocompatibility with a minimal inflammatory response in porcine coronary arteries at up to 16 weeks.
One concern with a biodegradable stent is whether stent degradation occurs in a reasonable time period. To reduce restenosis in humans, stents must maintain their scaffolding strength for >6 months to overcome late vessel remodeling.14 15 16 PLLA has been used for orthopedic applications in humans and has generally been found to be biocompatible for at least the first few weeks to months after implantation.17 18 19 20 Therefore, we selected PLLA from among several biodegradable polymers for the human coronary stent. According to the IVUS analysis at follow-up, the PLLA stents used in this study seemed to maintain their scaffolding properties at 6 months. It was not possible to identify signs of biodegradation. We could not show the dissolution time and whether intimal hyperplasia or other problems might develop late when the stent begins to break down; this is the major limitation of the study. Long-term follow-up using IVUS is scheduled to clarify the lifetime of this stent in human coronary arteries for this cohort.
We reported the initial and 6-month results of PLLA biodegradable coronary stents in humans. Our preliminary experience suggests the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PLLA stents within a 6-month time frame. If the restenosis rate is comparable with metallic stents in larger numbers of patients over a longer time frame, PLLA stents can be an attractive alternative to metallic stents and serve as a useful vehicle for locally administered drugs. Because of the biodegradable feature of this stent, longer-term studies are necessary to investigate the interaction between the postulated disappearance of the stent strut and the restenosis mechanism. Follow-up studies past 6 months in this cohort are now underway. Finally, we plan to conduct further studies with larger numbers of patients to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of PLLA stenting for human coronary arteries.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received September 28, 1999; revision received January 28, 2000; accepted February 15, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Fishman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al, for the Stent
Restenosis Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of
coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the
treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J
Med. 1994;331:496501.
3.
Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al, for the
Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent
implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary
artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489495.
4. Zidar J, Lincoff A, Stack R. Biodegradable stents. In: Topol EJ, ed. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saundars; 1994:787802.
5. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, et al. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:616623.[Abstract]
6.
Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, et al. Incidence of
restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a
time-related phenomenon: a quantitative angiographic study in 342
consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. Circulation. 1988;77:361371.
7.
Kimura T, Yokoi H, Nakagawa Y, et al. Three- year
follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery
stents. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:561566.
8.
Van der Giessen WJ, Lincoff AM, Schwartz RS, et al.
Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and
nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary artery.
Circulation. 1996;94:16901697.
9. Lincoff AM, Furst JG, Ellis SG, et al. Sustained local delivery of dexamethasone by a novel intravascular eluting stent to prevent restenosis in the porcine coronary injury model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:808816.[Abstract]
10.
Yamawaki T, Shimokawa H, Kozai T, et al. Intramural
delivery of a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor with
biodegradable stent suppresses the restenotic changes of the
coronary artery in pigs in vivo. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1998;32:780786.
11.
Murphy JG, Schwartz RS, Edwards WD, et al.
Percutaneous polymeric stents in porcine
coronary arteries: initial experience with polyethylene
terephthalate stent. Circulation. 1992;86:15961604.
12. Karas SP, Gravanis MB, Santonian EC, et al. Coronary intimal proliferation after balloon injury and stenting in swine: an animal model of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:467474.[Abstract]
13. Tamai H, Igaki K, Tsuji T, et al. A biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stent in porcine coronary artery. J Interv Cardiol. 1999;12:443450.
14. Currier JW, Faxon DP. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: have we been aiming at the wrong target? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:516520.[Abstract]
15.
Minz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al.
Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty: a
serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996;94:3543.
16.
Lansky AJ, Mintz GS, Pompa JJ, et al. Remodeling after
directional coronary atherectomy (with and without adjunct
percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty): a serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound
analysis from the Optimal Atherectomy Restenosis Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:329337.
17. Schkenraad JM, Oosterbaan P, Nieuwenhuis P. Biodegradable hollow fibers for the controlled release of drugs. Biomaterials. 1988;9:116120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Schakenraad JM, Hardonk MJ, Feijen J, et al. Enzyme activity toward poly (L-lactic acid) implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:529545.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Bos RRM, Boering G, Rozema FR, et al. Resorbable poly (l-lactide) plates and screws for the fixation of zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:751753.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Suganuma J, Alexander H. Biological response of intramedullary bone to poly-l-lactic acid. J Appl Biomater. 1993;4:1327.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Ormiston and P. W.S. Serruys Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents Circ Cardiovasc Interv, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 255 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U Kaul and V Bhatia Choice of DES: is there a difference? Heart Asia, March 6, 2009; 2009(2): 11 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Maeng, L O Jensen, E Falk, H R Andersen, and L Thuesen Negative vascular remodelling after implantation of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries: a randomised comparison with bare-metal and sirolimus-eluting stents Heart, February 1, 2009; 95(3): 241 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tanimoto, N. Bruining, R. T. van Domburg, D. Rotger, P. Radeva, J. M. Ligthart, and P. W. Serruys Late Stent Recoil of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent and its Relationship With Plaque Morphology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1616 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Helmus, D. F. Gibbons, and D. Cebon Biocompatibility: Meeting a Key Functional Requirement of Next-Generation Medical Devices Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 70 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Daemen and P. W. Serruys Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part I: A Survey of Current and Future Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: Meaningful Advances or More of the Same? Circulation, July 17, 2007; 116(3): 316 - 328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Geraghty Bioabsorbable Stenting for Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 295 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Whittaker and M. F. Fillinger The Engineering of Endovascular Stent Technology: A Review Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2006; 40(2): 85 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys, M. J.B. Kutryk, and A. T.L. Ong Coronary-Artery Stents N. Engl. J. Med., February 2, 2006; 354(5): 483 - 495. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Costa and D. I. Simon Molecular Basis of Restenosis and Drug-Eluting Stents Circulation, May 3, 2005; 111(17): 2257 - 2273. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Sousa, M. A. Costa, E. M. Tuzcu, J. S. Yadav, and S. Ellis New Frontiers in Interventional Cardiology Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 671 - 681. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lu, N. Zhuang, S.-S. Mao, J. Child, S. Carson, and M. J. Budoff Baseline Heart Rate-adjusted Electrocardiographic Triggering for Coronary Artery Electron-Beam CT Angiography Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 590 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vogt, A. Stein, G. Rettemeier, N. Krott, R. Hoffmann, J. v. Dahl, A.-K. Bosserhoff, W. Michaeli, P. Hanrath, C. Weber, et al. Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1330 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Heublein, R Rohde, V Kaese, M Niemeyer, W Hartung, and A Haverich Biocorrosion of magnesium alloys: a new principle in cardiovascular implant technology? Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 651 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ozawa, D. A. G. Mickle, R. D. Weisel, N. Koyama, S. Ozawa, and R.-K. Li Optimal Biomaterial for Creation of Autologous Cardiac Grafts Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(12_suppl_1): I-176 - I-182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Peuster, P Wohlsein, M Brugmann, M Ehlerding, K Seidler, C Fink, H Brauer, A Fischer, and G Hausdorf A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal---results 6-18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits Heart, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 563 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Regar, G Sianos, and P W Serruys Stent development and local drug delivery Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 227 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Baron Expandable Metal Stents for the Treatment of Cancerous Obstruction of the Gastrointestinal Tract N. Engl. J. Med., May 31, 2001; 344(22): 1681 - 1687. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sriram and C. Patterson Cell Cycle in Vasculoproliferative Diseases : Potential Interventions and Routes of Delivery Circulation, May 15, 2001; 103(19): 2414 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Seabra-Gomes Radioactive stents to reduce restenosis: time for an epitaph? Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2001; 22(8): 621 - 623. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Early Results with Biodegradable Stents Journal Watch Cardiology, September 29, 2000; 2000(929): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo and E. Karvouni Biodegradable Stents : "Fulfilling the Mission and Stepping Away" Circulation, July 25, 2000; 102(4): 371 - 373. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |