Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:3060-3067

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rauchhaus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Anker, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rauchhaus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Anker, S. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Congestive

(Circulation. 2000;102:3060.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Plasma Cytokine Parameters and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Mathias Rauchhaus, MD; Wolfram Doehner, MD; Darrel P. Francis, MD; Constantinos Davos, MD, PhD; Michael Kemp, FRCPath; Christa Liebenthal; Josef Niebauer, MD, PhD; James Hooper, MD; Hans-Dieter Volk, MD; Andrew J. S. Coats, DM; Stefan D. Anker, MD, PhD

From Clinical Cardiology, National Heart and Lung Institute (M.R., W.D., D.P.F., C.D., J.N., A.J.S.C., S.D.A.), and Biochemistry, Royal Brompton Hospital (M.K., J.H.), London, UK; the Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Martin-Luther-Universität (M.R.), Halle, Germany; and the Institut für Medizinische Immunologie, Charité (Campus Mitte) (C.L., H.-D.V.), and Franz-Volhard-Klinik (Charité, Campus Berlin-Buch) am Max-Delbrück Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (S.D.A.), Berlin, Germany.

Correspondence to Mathias Rauchhaus, MD, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Martin-Luther-Universität, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06097 Halle, Germany. E-mail mathias.rauchhaus{at}medizin.uni-halle.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Inflammatory immune activation is an important feature in chronic heart failure (CHF). Little is known about the prognostic importance of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}), soluble TNF-receptor 1 and 2 (sTNF-R1/sTNF-R2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and soluble CD14 receptors (sCD14) in CHF patients.

Methods and Results—In 152 CHF patients (age 61±1 years, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class 2.6±0.1, peak O2 17.3±0.6 mL · kg-1 · min-1, mean±SEM) plasma concentrations of immune variables were prospectively assessed. During a mean follow-up of 34 months (>12 months in all patients), 62 patients (41%) died. Cumulative mortality was 28% at 24 months. In univariate analyses, increased total and trimeric TNF-{alpha}, sTNF-R1, and sTNF-R2 (all P<=0.0001), sCD14 (P=0.0007), and IL-6 (P=0.005) predicted 24-month mortality. With multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristics, sTNF-R1 emerged among all cytokine parameters as the strongest and most accurate prognosticator in this CHF population, regardless of follow-up duration and independently of NYHA class, peak O2, E/CO2 slope, left ventricular ejection fraction, and wasting (P<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for sTNF-R1 was greater than for sTNF-R2 at 6, 12, and 18 months (all P<0.05).

Conclusions—sTNF-R1 was the strongest and most accurate prognosticator, independent of established markers of CHF severity. Assessment of sTNF-R1 may be useful in identifying patients who are at high risk of death and in monitoring patients undergoing anti–TNF-{alpha} treatment.


Key Words: heart failure • immune system • proteins • prognosis • mortality


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) and other proinflammatory cytokine parameters can be elevated in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (CHF).1 2 3 Little is known, however, about the prognostic importance of these immune markers in CHF. Previous reports on inflammatory cytokines and cytokine receptors are controversial or refer to short-term follow-up only.4 5 6 Soluble TNF receptor 1 and 2 (sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2) have been found to be particularly high in unstable patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV who died during 1 month of follow-up (P<0.001).7 Plasma concentrations of soluble TNF receptors vary less than those of TNF-{alpha} and interleukin-6 (IL-6)8 and appear to reflect the history of inflammatory immune activation. They may therefore more closely relate to the patient’s clinical condition.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Population
Between 1992 and 1998, we consecutively enrolled 152 patients (142 men, 10 women) aged 23 to 85 years into our metabolic study program. The clinical details are given in Table 1Down. The diagnosis of CHF was based on standard criteria.2 In 135 patients, near-maximal exercise capacity was achieved, as indicated by a respiratory exchange ratio >1.00 during treadmill exercise testing with gas exchange analysis (Amis 2000). All patients were receiving standard medical treatment consisting of diuretics (96%), ACE inhibitors (91%), digoxin, aspirin, oral nitrates, statins, warfarin, calcium antagonists, angiotensin II receptor blockers (7%), and ß-adrenoreceptor antagonists (12%) in various combinations. Patients were excluded from the study if they had clinical signs of acute infection, rheumatoid disease, severe renal failure (creatinine >250 µmol/L), or myocardial infarction within the previous 12 months or if they were suspected of having a malignant or a primary wasting disorder. The presence of cardiac cachexia (n=44) was diagnosed as defined previously.9 Sixty (29%) of the 152 patients were studied before June 1995 and were included in a previous mortality study that focused on cachexia.9


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Consecutive Patients With CHF

Follow-Up
We planned a minimum follow-up of 12 months in all patients. This was achieved by outpatient assessments, telephone contact with the patient or his or her local physician, or through the Hospital Information System by October 1999. Of the survivors, 26 patients were censored with a follow-up between 1 and 2 years. Twenty-one patients died between 25 and 75 months and have been censored for the follow-up of interest. The primary end point of the study was all-cause mortality.

Laboratory Measurements
Fasting blood samples were collected after supine rest for 20 minutes. The procedures for collecting blood samples and assaying EDTA plasma concentrations of sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, soluble CD14 (sCD14), and total TNF-{alpha} (ie, trimers and fragments10 ) have been described elsewhere.11 Concentrations of trimeric, bioactive TNF-{alpha}10 were determined by the high-sensitivity human TNF-{alpha} test (R&D Systems, sensitivity 0.18 pg/mL). Plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured by Immulite (sensitivity 1.0 pg/mL, Random Access Immunoassay Analyzer, DPC Biermann).

Statistical Analyses
Data are given as mean±SEM. IL-6 and TNF-{alpha} plasma concentrations were log-transformed before analysis. The unpaired Student t test, {chi}2 test, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used as appropriate. Hazard ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs and probability values by the likelihood ratio test are given (StatView 5.0, Abacus Concepts).

To compare different predictive values at a particular time point, areas under the curve (AUCs) for sensitivity and specificity were constructed. The best prognostic cutoff for survival status at a given time point was defined as that which gave the highest product of sensitivity and specificity. To contrast prognostic accuracy, statistical comparison of receiver operating characteristics (ROC)12 was performed (MedCalc, version 5.0, MedCalc Software).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Survival
Of the 152 CHF patients, 62 (41%) died after 4 to 2286 days (median 404 days). Mean follow-up period of the 90 survivors was 1355±88 days (range 366 to 2747, median 1114 days). Cumulative mortality rate for all patients was 11% (95% CI 6% to 16%) at 6 months (17 deaths), 20% (95% CI 13% to 26%) at 12 months (30 deaths), 26% (95% CI 19% to 33%) at 18 months (39 deaths), and 27% (95% CI 21% to 35%) at 24 months (41 deaths).

Cytokine Concentrations
Plasma concentrations of the immune markers are depicted in Table 1Up. Most of the cytokine parameters correlated with each other significantly, except for the relationship of IL-6 with trimeric TNF-{alpha} and sCD14 (r<0.10, P>0.40). The strongest relationships were found between sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2 (r=0.73) and between total TNF-{alpha} and trimeric TNF-{alpha} (r=0.63, both P<0.0001). The relationship between plasma concentrations of sTNF-R1 and NYHA functional class is illustrated in Figure 1ADown.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Relationship between sTNF-R1 and NYHA functional class. Upper limit of normal concentrations of sTNF-R1 of healthy control subjects of similar age (mean+2 SD) is indicated, based on data published elsewhere.21 B, Kaplan-Meier survival curves for sTNF-R1 quartiles at 24 months. Cutoff values and corresponding hazard ratios (small bar plots) are given. P value refers to Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Univariate Survival Analyses
Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that increased concentrations of sTNF-R1 ({chi}2=26.1), sTNF-R2 ({chi}2=15.1), both total and trimeric TNF-{alpha} ({chi}2=14.5 and 24.1, respectively, all P<=0.0001), sCD14 ({chi}2=11.4, P=0.003), and IL-6 ({chi}2=7.9, P=0.005) predicted 24-month mortality (Table 2Down). Peak O2 ({chi}2=25.5, P<0.0001, n=135), NYHA class ({chi}2=18.3, P<0.0001), serum creatinine ({chi}2=14.8, P<0.0001), E/CO2 slope ({chi}2=12.1, P=0.0001, n=135), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ({chi}2=10.3, P=0.004, n=130, 26 patients with LVEF >40%), age ({chi}2=7.3, P=0.009), and the presence of cardiac cachexia ({chi}2=6.5, P=0.008) were also significant prognosticators, whereas serum sodium concentration was not ({chi}2=3.1, P=0.08). Plasma concentrations of all immune markers within the highest quartile were significantly predictive for impaired 24-month survival (Table 2Down). Highest quartiles of creatinine (>142 µmol/L, RR=3.64, P<0.0001) and E/CO2 slope (>43.9, RR=2.49, P=0.006) and lowest quartiles of peak O2 (<=12.2 mL·kg-1·min-1, RR 3.43, P=0.0002), LVEF (<=17%, RR=2.94, P=0.001), and serum sodium (<=135 mmol/L, RR=2.40, P=0.006) also predicted increased 24-month mortality. No significance was seen for the highest quartile of age (>69.6 years, RR=1.39, P=0.34).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Univariate Analysis: Predictors of 24-Month Mortality in Patients With CHF (Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis)

Multivariate Survival Analyses
sTNF-R1 (P<0.0001), trimeric TNF-{alpha} (P<0.0001), IL-6 (P=0.006), and total TNF-{alpha} (P=0.02, n=85) predicted 24-month mortality independently of age and peak O2. A trend was seen for sCD14 (P=0.06, n=120). In bivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses with all cytokines, sTNF-R1 emerged as the strongest mortality-predicting immune parameter (P<0.001 versus sTNF-R2, total TNF-{alpha}, IL-6, and sCD14). Among the cytokine parameters measured, only trimeric TNF-{alpha} (P=0.014) predicted mortality independently of sTNF-R1 (P=0.0015). Trimeric TNF-{alpha} also predicted 24-month mortality independently of other cytokine parameters studied (P<0.001 in all paired analyses) with the exception of IL-6, which was the only other significant parameter. Quartiles of sTNF-R1 in relation to 24-month mortality are illustrated in Figure 1BUp. CHF patients in the top quartile had a 12-fold higher risk of death than patients in the lowest quartile (RR=12.34, 95% CI 4.9 to 31.3, P<0.0001). Clinical variables that predicted 24-month mortality independently of sTNF-R1 (LVEF, peak O2, NYHA functional class, and E/CO2 slope) are presented in Table 3Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Analyses for 24-Month Mortality

In multivariate analysis with sTNF-R1 and clinical parameters (peak O2, E/CO2, LVEF, and NYHA class), only sTNF-R1 (P<0.0001), LVEF (P<0.01), and peak O2 (P<0.01) related to 24-month mortality independently (Table 3Up, analysis 1). The presence of cachexia predicted 24-month mortality independently of peak O2 and LVEF (Table 3Up, analysis 2). However, when sTNF-R1 was added to these 3 variables, cachexia no longer had independent prognostic value (analysis 3). The best 3-parameter model for mortality prediction included sTNF-R1, LVEF, and peak O2 (joint {chi}2=54.4, P<0.0001, analysis 4). Age, serum sodium, and measures of liver and kidney function were not predictive of mortality in multivariate analyses. After adjustment for body wasting, differences in drug therapy, or the dose of diuretics, the principal results did not change. When the group of noncachectic patients was analyzed alone, sTNF-R1 also revealed the strongest prognostic power (P<0.0001) in univariate and multivariate analyses (Table 4Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis for 24-Month Mortality in Noncachectic CHF Only

Receiver Operating Characteristics
Sensitivity and specificity for the cytokine parameters, LVEF, and peak O2 to predict mortality at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were assessed across a range of cutoff values. At all time points, the ROC AUC for mortality prediction was highest for sTNF-R1 (best cutoff values 1067, 958, 1460, and 1124 pg/mL, respectively, for 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up). (A table giving detailed results on sensitivity, specificity, and best cutoff values for all parameters can be obtained from the authors on request.) To illustrate the relationships between cytokines, soluble receptors, and mortality, Kaplan-Meier survival curves using the optimal cutoff at 24 months are presented in Figure 2Down. The best cutoff value for sTNF-R1 at 24-month follow-up had 83% sensitivity (95% CI 68% to 93%) and 73% specificity (95% CI 62% to 82%) to predict mortality (ROC AUC 0.84±0.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91). This was the highest observed ROC AUC. The ROC AUCs for sTNF-R1 were somewhat larger at all respective time points than that of peak O2, but the differences did not reach significance at any specific time point (all P>0.19). Compared with LVEF, prognostic importance of sTNF-R1 increased with time of follow-up (6, 12, 18, 24 months: P=0.44, P=0.19, P=0.03, and P=0.01, respectively). sTNF-R1 predicted mortality significantly better than sTNF-R2 at 6 months (AUC 0.78±0.07 versus 0.62±0.08, P=0.017), 12 months (0.77±0.05 versus 0.63±0.06, P=0.003, Figure 3Down), and 18 months of follow-up (0.83±0.04 versus 0.73±0.05, P=0.034). There was also a trend at 24 months (P=0.07). At 24 months, the ROC AUC for sTNF-R1 was significantly larger than that for IL-6 (P=0.0001) and sCD14 (P=0.004), but it was not significantly different from that of total TNF-{alpha} (P=0.09) and was nearly identical to that of trimeric TNF-{alpha} (0.80±0.06, P=0.62). The accuracy of both TNF-{alpha} test kits, as assessed by ROC AUCs, was not significantly different at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (all P>0.20).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CHF patients in regard to best cutoff value of IL-6, total and trimeric TNF-{alpha}, sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2, and soluble CD14 (sCD14) at 24-month follow-up.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mortality predictive accuracy of sTNF-R1 vs sTNF-R2 at 12 months is illustrated with ROC for sensitivity and specificity.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our study reveals that increased plasma concentrations of cytokines and soluble cytokine receptors significantly predict impaired median to longer-term survival in patients with CHF. The best mortality predictive value and accuracy was found for sTNF-R1, which provided the highest sensitivity and specificity among all immune parameters, independently of clinical variables and length of follow-up.

Interleukin-6
Most studied in CHF is the relationship between mortality and IL-6 plasma concentrations. IL-6 has been linked to CHF severity,4 13 and it has been associated with a poor short-term14 and long-term clinical outcome.6 15 In CHF patients enrolled in PRAISE (Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation),5 adverse events occurred somewhat more commonly in patients with higher IL-6 levels (P=0.07), whereas a report from the SOLVD treatment trial (Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction) did not find such a relationship in patients with NYHA class I to III functional classification (P=0.72).4 We found, consistent with other studies,16 17 that IL-6 concentrations were increased mainly in patients with NYHA class IV (data not shown) and that IL-6 is a significant prognosticator in univariate analysis (P=0.005). IL-6, however, lost its prognostic power (P=0.33) in multivariate analysis with sTNF-R1 (P<0.0001). Because Cox proportional hazards analysis assumes normally distributed variables, IL-6 required transformation. This was not commented on in the long-term study by Tsutamoto et al.6 Additionally, in that study,6 TNF receptors were not measured, and therefore a comparison between the 2 cytokine parameters is not possible. Because of a relatively high short-term variability of IL-6 concentrations,8 interpretation of results may vary between studies. Different methods of assessing IL-6 plasma concentrations may further complicate comparisons between studies. Finally, a slightly different genetic predisposition of an Asian CHF population may contribute to the impressive prognostic power of IL-6 in the study by Tsutamoto et al.6

Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}
For approximately 10 years, it has been known that TNF-{alpha} concentrations are raised in patients with severe CHF, particularly in those with cachexia.1 2 3 In the SOLVD study,4 TNF-{alpha} (R&D ELISA) has been linked to weakly impaired long-term survival in CHF patients (P=0.07), but NYHA class IV patients were not included in the assessment. Differences between studies may be explained by marked daily and weekly variability of TNF-{alpha},8 its short half-life, and differences between test kits.18 We found a relatively good sensitivity and specificity of both total and trimeric TNF-{alpha} for predicting clinical outcome. Both TNF-{alpha} indices predicted prognosis independently of peak O2, and the prognostic value of the 2 TNF-{alpha} indices did not differ significantly.

Soluble TNF Receptors
The best overall predictive value for increased mortality among all the cytokine parameters, across different time points as well as after restriction of mortality to noncachectic CHF patients, was found for sTNF-R1. For each 1000-pg/mL increase in sTNF-R1 concentrations, the mortality hazard increased by 50% (95% CI 50% to 100%).

Like TNF-{alpha} and IL-6, sTNF receptors are highest in patients with severe CHF: in NYHA class IV,7 19 during phases of edematous decompensation,20 and in cachectic CHF patients.21 Moreover, compared with healthy subjects, increased concentrations of sTNF-R1 are already present in stable, noncachectic patients with mild CHF.21 sTNF-R1 appears to be the most powerful and independent immune marker and may well reflect its longer half-life and lower short-term variability.8 sTNF-R1 is also likely to best reflect the history of inflammatory immune activation in patients with CHF. Previous findings on short-term risk stratification in CHF patients suggested elevated sTNF-R2 concentrations to be somewhat better related to poor clinical outcome than those of sTNF-R1.7 However, the number of patients in that study7 was relatively small (n=37, 10 deaths), and the difference has not been tested statistically. In the present study, predictive accuracy of sTNF-R1 was consistently better than that of sTNF-R2 during follow-up between 6 and 24 months.

Clinical Implications
The primary goals for the treatment of end-stage CHF are improvements in survival and in quality of life. To achieve these goals, treatment needs to be tailored individually. To this end, prognostic markers that accurately define risk groups are needed. In the present study, the best mortality-predicting 3-parameter model included sTNF-R1, LVEF, and peak O2. Our study confirms that cachexia predicts prognosis independently of LVEF and peak O2 as previously shown.9 However, the "bedside marker" cardiac cachexia lost its independent prognostic power in multivariate comparison when the humoral marker sTNF-R1 was included. This was not entirely unexpected, because wasting is closely associated with immune activation.2 21 Moreover, a dichotomous marker is very likely to lose significance when comparison is made with a continuously distributed variable with >4000 degrees of freedom. Additionally, we found a somewhat higher proportion of cachectic patients in the present study (28.9%) than in a previous study (16.4%).9 We believe this does not reflect a selection bias toward patients with wasting, although we have a strong interest in studying cardiac cachexia. It may, however, result from our very strict assessment of cachexia in all CHF patients referred to our center using a semistandardized questionnaire. Because we perform very detailed metabolic assessments, we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that more cachectic patients are being referred to us than to other centers. Most importantly, in this context, the results of the analyses in noncachectic patients alone need to be considered (Table 4Up). All our findings, particularly with regard to the importance of sTNF-R1, are still valid when cachectic CHF patients are excluded.

Our study adds evidence to recent findings that show neurohormonal and immunologic factors may be of greater prognostic importance than the more conventional assessments of the hemodynamic and clinical status.22 23 This suggests that immunologic abnormalities are not simply an epiphenomenon in patients with CHF but that they carry independent pathophysiological importance that ultimately leads to a prognostic impact on mortality, which is supported by findings of Meldrum and coworkers.24 By specifically targeting TNF-{alpha} using a TNF receptor/human IgG-fusion protein, one study has already shown some clinical benefit in a small group of CHF patients.25 Larger clinical trials are currently ongoing to examine the effects of antagonizing TNF-{alpha} bioactivity.26 It is hoped that this will demonstrate whether counteracting the TNF-{alpha} pathway in patients with moderate to severe CHF in general confers morbidity and mortality benefits. If this is not the case, then a well-reproducible measure of inflammatory immune activation with strong prognostic value (like sTNF-R1) may define patient subgroups likely to benefit from anti-TNF-{alpha} therapy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Rauchhaus was supported by grants of the Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, and of the Deutsche Herzstiftung, Frankfurt. Dr Doehner is supported by a grant of the Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Berliner Charité and a PhD studentship of the National Heart & Lung Institute, London. Dr Francis was supported by the British Heart Foundation. Dr Coats is supported by the Viscount Royston Trust and the British Heart Foundation. Dr Anker was supported by the Ernst- und Bertha-Grimmke-Stiftung in Düsseldorf, Germany, and by a postgraduate fellowship of the Max Delbrück Centrum, Berlin. Support was also received from the Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust Joint Committee for Research, London, UK. The authors thank Dr Aidan Bolger for critically reading the manuscript.

Received May 12, 2000; revision received July 26, 2000; accepted August 1, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Levine B, Kalman J, Mayer L, et al. Elevated circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:236–241.[Abstract]
  2. Anker SD, Chua TP, Ponikowski P, et al. Hormonal changes and catabolic/anabolic imbalance in chronic heart failure and their importance for cardiac cachexia. Circulation. 1997;96:526–534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zhao SP, Zeng LH. Elevated plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor in chronic heart failure with cachexia. Int J Cardiol. 1997;58:257–261.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Torre-Amione G, Kapadia S, Benedict C, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine levels in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction: a report from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1201–1206.[Abstract]
  5. Mohler ER, Sorensen LC, Ghali JK, et al. Role of cytokines in the mechanism of action of amlodipine: the PRAISE Heart Failure Trial: Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:35–41.[Abstract]
  6. Tsutamoto T, Hisanaga T, Wada A, et al. Interleukin-6 spillover in the peripheral circulation increases with the severity of heart failure, and the high plasma level of interleukin- 6 is an important prognostic predictor in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:391–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ferrari R, Bachetti T, Confortini R, et al. Tumor necrosis factor soluble receptors in patients with various degrees of congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995;92:1479–1486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dibbs Z, Thornby J, White BG, et al. Natural variability of circulating levels of cytokines and cytokine receptors in patients with heart failure: implications for clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1935–1942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Anker SD, Ponikowski P, Varney S, et al. Wasting as independent risk factor for mortality in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1997;349:1050–1053.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Asadullah K, Docke WD, Reinke P, et al. Cytokine determination: diagnostic significance from the clinical and immunological viewpoint. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997;122:1424–1431.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Anker SD, Egerer KR, Volk HD, et al. Elevated soluble CD14 receptors and altered cytokines in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1426–1430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Deng MC, Erren M, Lutgen A, et al. Interleukin-6 correlates with hemodynamic impairment during dobutamine administration in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 1996;57:129–134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. MacGowan GA, Mann DL, Kormos RL, et al. Circulating interleukin-6 in severe heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1128–1131.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Roig E, Orus J, Pare C, et al. Serum interleukin-6 in congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:688–690.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Aukrust P, Ueland T, Lien E, et al. Cytokine network in congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:376–382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Koller-Strametz J, Pacher R, Frey B, et al. Circulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in chronic heart failure: relation to its soluble receptor II, interleukin-6, and neurohumoral variables. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:356–362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Kapadia S, Torre-Amione G, Mann DL. Pitfalls in measuring cytokines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:149–150.[Free Full Text]
  19. Torre-Amione G, Kapadia S, Lee J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and tumor necrosis factor receptors in the failing human heart. Circulation. 1996;93:704–711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Niebauer J, Volk HD, Kemp M, et al. Endotoxin and immune activation in chronic heart failure: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1838–1842.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Anker SD, Ponikowski PP, Clark AL, et al. Cytokines and neurohormones relating to body composition alterations in the wasting syndrome of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:683–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Swedberg K, Eneroth P, Kjekshus J, et al. Hormones regulating cardiovascular function in patients with severe congestive heart failure and their relation to mortality: CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Circulation. 1990;82:1730–1736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Omland T, Aakvaag A, Bonarjee VV, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and N- terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide. Circulation. 1996;93:1963–1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Meldrum DR, Dinarello CA, Shames BD, et al. Ischemic preconditioning decreases postischemic myocardial tumor necrosis factor-alpha production: potential ultimate effector mechanism of preconditioning. Circulation. 1998;98(suppl II):II-214–II-218.
  25. Deswal A, Bozkurt B, Seta Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of a soluble P75 tumor necrosis factor receptor (Enbrel, etanercept) in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 1999;99:3224–3226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mann DL. Mechanisms and models in heart failure: a combinatorial approach. Circulation. 1999;100:999–1008.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S Metyas, D La, and D G Arkfeld
The use of the tumour necrosis factor antagonist infliximab in heart transplant recipients: two case reports
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2007; 66(11): 1544 - 1545.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Sandek, J. Bauditz, A. Swidsinski, S. Buhner, J. Weber-Eibel, S. von Haehling, W. Schroedl, T. Karhausen, W. Doehner, M. Rauchhaus, et al.
Altered Intestinal Function in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2007; 50(16): 1561 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
K. Reifenberg, H.-A. Lehr, M. Torzewski, G. Steige, E. Wiese, I. Kupper, C. Becker, S. Ott, P. Nusser, K.-I. Yamamura, et al.
Interferon-{gamma} Induces Chronic Active Myocarditis and Cardiomyopathy in Transgenic Mice
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2007; 171(2): 463 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W. Doehner, A. C. Bunck, M. Rauchhaus, S. von Haehling, F. M. Brunkhorst, M. Cicoira, C. Tschope, P. Ponikowski, R. A. Claus, and S. D. Anker
Secretory sphingomyelinase is upregulated in chronic heart failure: a second messenger system of immune activation relates to body composition, muscular functional capacity, and peripheral blood flow
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2007; 28(7): 821 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. von Haehling, W. Doehner, and S. D Anker
Nutrition, metabolism, and the complex pathophysiology of cachexia in chronic heart failure
Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2007; 73(2): 298 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. Roig
Usefulness of neurohormonal markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2006; 8(suppl_E): E12 - E17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
E. A. Jankowska, P. Ponikowski, M. F. Piepoli, W. Banasiak, S. D. Anker, and P. A. Poole-Wilson
Autonomic imbalance and immune activation in chronic heart failure - Pathophysiological links
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2006; 70(3): 434 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y.-D. Tang and S. D. Katz
Anemia in Chronic Heart Failure: Prevalence, Etiology, Clinical Correlates, and Treatment Options
Circulation, May 23, 2006; 113(20): 2454 - 2461.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. S Schleithoff, A. Zittermann, G. Tenderich, H. K Berthold, P. Stehle, and R. Koerfer
Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 754 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Taniguchi, M. Fukushima, Y. Nakai, M. Ohgushi, A. Kuroe, M. Ohya, and Y. Seino
Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 Is Strongly and Independently Associated With Serum Homocysteine in Nonobese Japanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2006; 29(4): 949 - 950.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Christ, T. Klima, W. Grimm, H.-H. Mueller, and B. Maisch
Prognostic significance of serum cholesterol levels in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2006; 27(6): 691 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Sola, M. Q.S. Mir, S. Lerakis, N. Tandon, and B. V. Khan
Atorvastatin Improves Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Nonischemic Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 332 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Ueland, J. Kjekshus, S. S. Froland, T. Omland, I. B. Squire, L. Gullestad, K. Dickstein, and P. Aukrust
Plasma Levels of Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Type I During the Acute Phase Following Complicated Myocardial Infarction Predicts Survival in High-Risk Patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2018 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N. Lamblin, F. Mouquet, B. Hennache, J. Dagorn, S. Susen, C. Bauters, and P. de Groote
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: potential adjunct for risk stratification in patients with stable congestive heart failure
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2005; 26(21): 2245 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Yoshida, H. Hanawa, K. Toba, H. Watanabe, R. Watanabe, K. Yoshida, S. Abe, K. Kato, M. Kodama, and Y. Aizawa
Expression of immunological molecules by cardiomyocytes and inflammatory and interstitial cells in rat autoimmune myocarditis
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2005; 68(2): 278 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Meyer, D. Mortl, K. Strecker, M. Hulsmann, V. Kulemann, T. Neunteufl, R. Pacher, and R. Berger
Flow-Mediated Vasodilation Predicts Outcome in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Comparison With B-Type Natriuretic Peptide
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 20, 2005; 46(6): 1011 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Fukuta, D. C. Sane, S. Brucks, and W. C. Little
Statin Therapy May Be Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure: A Preliminary Report
Circulation, July 19, 2005; 112(3): 357 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
M. M. Kittleson, K. M. Minhas, R. A. Irizarry, S. Q. Ye, G. Edness, E. Breton, J. V. Conte, G. Tomaselli, J. G. N. Garcia, and J. M. Hare
Gene expression analysis of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy: shared and distinct genes in the development of heart failure
Physiol Genomics, May 11, 2005; 21(3): 299 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Valgimigli, C. Ceconi, P. Malagutti, E. Merli, O. Soukhomovskaia, G. Francolini, G. Cicchitelli, A. Olivares, G. Parrinello, G. Percoco, et al.
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Receptor 1 Is a Major Predictor of Mortality and New-Onset Heart Failure in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Cytokine-Activation and Long-Term Prognosis in Myocardial Infarction (C-ALPHA) Study
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 863 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. P. Curtis, J. G. Selter, Y. Wang, S. S. Rathore, I. S. Jovin, F. Jadbabaie, M. Kosiborod, E. L. Portnay, S. I. Sokol, F. Bader, et al.
The Obesity Paradox: Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure
Arch Intern Med, January 10, 2005; 165(1): 55 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. M. Biasucci
CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Clinical Use of Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Background Paper
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): e560 - e567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. Mozaffarian, E. B Rimm, I. B King, R. L Lawler, G. B McDonald, and W. C Levy
trans Fatty acids and systemic inflammation in heart failure
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1521 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Axelsson, A. Rashid Qureshi, M. E Suliman, H. Honda, R. Pecoits-Filho, O. Heimburger, B. Lindholm, T. Cederholm, and P. Stenvinkel
Truncal fat mass as a contributor to inflammation in end-stage renal disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1222 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]