(Circulation. 2000;102:e182.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Section of Heart Failure and Transplantation Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
To the Editor:
We read with great interest the article by Robbins et al1 describing how exercise-related ventilatory and heart rate responses better predict heart failure mortality than peak exercise oxygen consumption.2
Although Robbins et
al1 correctly state that
other investigators have shown that exercise-related ventilatory
abnormalities can be useful in predicting
mortality,3 they fail
to acknowledge the fact that our
group4 previously published
similar findings, which demonstrated that ventilatory abnormalities
were related to outcome in congestive heart failure. Importantly, we
demonstrated that by combining ventilatory abnormalities and peak
exercise oxygen consumption, patients at a particularly high risk for
death could be identified. These findings are similar to the data
presented in Figures 1, 5, and 7 of the article by Robbins et
al.1 In patients with minute
ventilation/carbon dioxide production
(
E/
CO2)
>50 and a peak exercise oxygen consumption <15
mL · kg-1· min-1,
we described a mortality rate of 82% (median follow-up time, 552±329
days) compared with a mortality of 22% in patients with a
E/
CO2
<50 and a peak exercise oxygen consumption <15
mL · kg-1 · min-1.
In addition, Robbins et al1
state that the value of
E/
CO2
at the anaerobic threshold was almost as strong a predictor
of mortality as
E/
CO2
at peak exercise. We also used
E/
CO2
at the anaerobic
threshold4 because it
predicted outcome better than
E/
CO2
at peak exercise. Robbins et
al1 further state that there
was a threshold phenomenon regarding
E/
CO2
values, with mortality increasing markedly as values exceeded 40 to 45.
Similarly, our data clearly show a marked increase in mortality with
values >50. The study by Robbins et
al2 had a follow-up period
similar to ours; however, they deserve credit for studying a larger
patient population and for analyzing data regarding chronotropic
responses to exercise.
On the basis of these published data,4 we have used exercise-related ventilatory responses in conjunction with peak exercise oxygen consumption to evaluate candidates for transplantation for the past 3 years at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. We believe that a proper scientific evaluation of the hypothesis that exercise-related ventilatory responses provide additional prognostic information in heart failure beyond that provided by peak exercise oxygen consumption requires a full recognition of all pertinent, previously published studies. Clearly, this is an important area of clinical research that may have a substantial impact on the management of patients with congestive heart failure.
References
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, lauerm@cesmtp.ccf.org
We thank Drs MacGowan and Murali for their letter. We agree that their study,R1 along with ours and those of others,R2 strongly support the view that ventilatory responses to exercise must be carefully considered when risk-stratifying patients with severe heart failure. We are also now routinely incorporating the ventilatory response to exercise in our metabolic stress test reports and in our considerations regarding candidacy for cardiac transplantation.
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |