Circulation. 2000;102:2898-2906
(Circulation. 2000;102:2898.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
The Elusive Pathophysiology of Neurally Mediated Syncope
Rogelio Mosqueda-Garcia, MD, PhD;
Raffaello Furlan, MD;
Jens Tank MD, PhD;
Roxana Fernandez-Violante, MD
From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, DuPont Pharmaceuticals,
Wilmington, Del (R.M.-G., R.F.-V.); Centro Ricerche Cardiovascolari, CNR,
Medicina Interna II, Ospedale "L. Sacco," Università di
Milano, Italy (R.F.); and Clinic Bavaria Kreischa, Department of Diabetes and
Endocrinology, Keischa, Germany (J.T.).
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Rogelio Mosqueda-Garcia, Dupont Pharmaceuticals Co, Chestnut Run Plaza, WR 2081, 974 Centre Road, Wilmington, DE 19805. E-mail Agustin.r.Mosqueda{at}Dupontpharma.com
Key Words: baroreceptors catecholamines nervous system, autonomic syncope microneurography
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Syncope is defined as a sudden transient loss of
consciousness
and postural tone due to cerebral hypoperfusion. Although
no
permanent medical sequelae should result from syncope itself,
isolated
or recurrent events are often dramatic and disrupt the
lifestyle
of affected individuals. Syncope is a common clinical problem
that
affects up to 3.5% of the general population.
1
Strikingly,
in close to 40% of cases, the exact cause of syncope
remains
elusive, and

30% of affected patients will experience
recurrent
episodes.
1
Neurally mediated syncope (NMS) is a common type of syncope (Figure 1
); clinical descriptions of it have been
present in the medical literature for >100 years. Despite its
prevalence, significant gaps in our understanding of its
pathophysiology and treatment remain. The purpose of this review is to
critically evaluate proposed theories that attempt to explain the
pathophysiological mechanisms of NMS.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Causes of syncope. NMS and orthostatic
intolerance (OI) are the most frequent causes of unexplained syncope.
Other causes may be hypoadrenergic (HypoAdr), cardiac (Card),
neurological (Neurol), psychiatric (Psych), and/or idiopathic
(Idiop).
|
|
 |
Definition
|
|---|
The development of arterial vasodilation in the
setting of relative
or absolute bradycardia characterizes NMS. This
syndrome has
also been known as vasovagal reaction, neurocardiogenic
syncope,
emotional fainting, or reflex syncope. Related processes
include
situational fainting (ie, shaving syncope), hyperadrenergic
and
hypoadrenergic conditions, and hypotensive reactions resulting
from
drug administration.
 |
Classification
|
|---|
We have classified NMS into several categories. These include
central
(for example, occurring in response to strong emotional
stimulation),
postural (associated with the upright position), and
situational
(after the specific stimulation of sensory or visceral
afferents).
Another classification considers the final
hemodynamic characteristics
of the patient and includes
categories such as vasodepressor,
bradycardic, or mixed
NMS.
2 One other classification relates
to the clinical
characteristics of the syncope and its response
to treatment. This
categorization includes malignant NMS (evolving
without a prodromal
period
3 or associated with prolonged
asystole),
4 recurrent NMS (repetitive or frequent syncope
in a particular
patient), and refractory NMS (does not respond to
medical treatment).
Postural NMS typically develops while the subject is standing or
walking, and it is much more frequent than the central and situational
types. As determined using a referral population evaluated at the
Syncope Unit at Vanderbilt Hospital, 94% of NMS cases fall into this
category (unpublished data, R. Mosqueda-Garcia). Central NMS
remains poorly characterized in humans. In susceptible individuals,
emotional stimulation can activate ill-defined areas within the
central nervous system that, in turn, trigger sympathetic inhibition
and parasympathetic activation. Situational NMS relates to the specific
stimulation of different and seemingly unrelated visceral,
sensory-proprioceptive, or specialized afferents that result in
hypotension and syncope. Examples include the types of syncope evoked
by the hypersensitivity of carotid baroreceptors, rapid bladder
distension, and gastrointestinal tract distention.
This review will discuss the pathophysiological
aspects of postural NMS, without exploring the pathophysiology of the
other types.
 |
Pathophysiology
|
|---|
A persons performance of vital and complex mental
functions
depends on an adequate cerebrovascular perfusion pressure
which,
under normal conditions, is preserved by
cardiovascular reflexes
such as the baroreceptor
reflex. Changes in posture and physical
exercise are among many
activities that challenge cerebral perfusion
and require the
involvement of neurocardiovascular reflexes.
For
example, on standing, the increase of gravitational forces
results in
the pooling of blood in the lower extremities (Figure
2

). After standing, between 500 and 800
mL of blood is trapped
in the distensible veins below the level of the
heart, plasma
moves to the interstitial fluid, and venous
return, cardiac
output, and blood pressure (BP) decrease. These changes
are
detected by baroreceptors located in the arterial and
cardiopulmonary
regions. Information from the baroreceptors is
then relayed
to the central nervous system, where neuronal cell groups
regulate
reflex cardiovascular activity through changes
in sympathetic
and parasympathetic outflow. These changes attempt to
restore
BP and preserve cerebral perfusion during
standing
5 (Figure
2

). Factors responsible for NMS
are varied and not always evident;
the exact
pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for
postural
NMS have not been totally elucidated, as is discussed
below.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Neurohumoral responses to orthostatic
stress. Some of the changes set in motion by passive upright tilt are
shown. IX indicates the glossopharyngeal nerve; X, vagal nerve; and
RAAS, renin angiotensin system.
|
|
Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Postural
NMS
Often, NMS develops after the subject experiences changes in
gravitational forces.6 One study suggested that an
abnormality in the peripheral veins could result in
exaggerated orthostatic pooling while
standing.7 Supporting this is the observation of greater
increments in calf venous volume with less variability during
orthostatic stress8 in subjects prone to
syncope. Others have shown decreased skeletal muscle tone in the lower
extremities during upright tilt9 or a failure of reflex
venoconstriction during exercise.10 In contrast, another
study documented venoconstriction in the forearm or hand veins of
patients with NMS during orthostatic stress.11
Also opposing the idea of exaggerated venous pooling in NMS patients
are studies documenting similar decreases in central venous pressure
during head-up tilt when compared with controls.11 12
After the initiating events of syncope, a complex
hemodynamic response develops, resulting in marked
hypotension, variable bradycardia, and loss of consciousness.
Several theories have been advanced to account for these
hemodynamic events. They are critically evaluated
below.
 |
The Ventricular Theory
|
|---|
This theory suggests that when baroreceptors detect a decrease
in
BP, a reflex increase in efferent sympathetic activity develops.
The
increase in sympathetic tone enhances total peripheral
resistance
and produces positive chronotropic and inotropic cardiac
effects.
The presence of increased cardiac sympathetic stimulation in
a
setting of ventricular hypovolemia is thought to result in
large
pressure transients that are evoked by the contraction of the
ventricular
muscle on an "empty chamber" (Figure 3

). The vigorous contraction
of the
hypovolemic ventricle, in turn, is thought to stimulate
"ventricular
afferents" in the left ventricle.
Activation of these afferents
might trigger an inhibitory
response similar to that of the
Bezold-Jarisch reflex,
13
resulting in hypotension and bradycardia.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Ventricular theory of NMS. The
proposed mechanism for the development of hypotension and bradycardia
resulting from the activation of ventricular afferents is
shown.
|
|
The ventricular theory was first proposed by
Sharpey-Schafer,14 and it gained wide acceptance
because it seemed to explain some clinical
pathophysiological observations (ie, exertional
syncope in aortic stenosis).13 In addition, this
theory seemed to provide a rational basis for the combination of
isoproterenol and tilt (in the diagnosis) and the use of ß-adrenergic
blockers (in the treatment) for NMS.15 Significant
experimental observations, however, are not explained by this theory,
and they challenge the concept of ventricular
mechanoreceptors as responsible for the universal development of
NMS.
Activation of Ventricular Mechanoreceptors
Recordings of Afferent Traffic
Studies by Oberg and Thoren16 seemed to provide an
anatomical substrate explaining the development of NMS. These authors
recorded increments in afferent vagal activity during the
bradycardic effect evoked by vena cava occlusion. Detailed
analyses of their results, however, indicate that only a
minority of the ventricular afferents (
20%) excited
after vena cava occlusion also responded with excitation during the
hemorrhagic event. Furthermore, they acknowledged that the vagal
filaments recorded in their experiments were not randomly sampled,
which lead to an overrepresentation of studied
ventricular afferents.16 Overall, it was not
clear if a "real" increase in ventricular afferent
activity was present with decreases in ventricular
load.
Sympathetic Withdrawal in Denervated Hearts
A direct challenge to the relevance of ventricular
afferents came from studies demonstrating that the inhibition of
sympathetic nerve activity evoked by hemorrhage remained
intact, even with total denervation of the heart.17 In
humans, NMS can be evoked in patients with heart
transplants,18 a circumstance that is independent of
autonomic reinnervation of the ventricle. Although it may be proposed
that receptors in other cardiovascular regions may be
excited by hypovolemia and trigger NMS, no experimental evidence of
increased afferent traffic from other thoracic regions is yet
available.
Ventricular Hypovolemia
Echocardiographic Determinations
The concept of circulating hypovolemia resulting from venous
pooling and causing a decrease in filling return to the heart is one
main postulate of the ventricular theory. Earlier reports
found evidence of significant decreases in left ventricular
dimensions.19 20 However, many of these studies were
performed either in subjects without spontaneous NMS or after high
doses of isoproterenol. More recently, others have demonstrated no
significant decreases in cardiac chamber size or volume during tilt, at
the time of presyncope, or during syncope in patients with
well-characterized NMS.21 Similarly, others were unable to
record significant changes in left ventricular
end-diastolic or end-systolic
dimensions.22
Increased Sympathetic Tone
Plasma Norepinephrine Determinations
Another important premise of the ventricular theory is
the presence of increased sympathetic tone. Attempts to evaluate
sympathetic function with plasma norepinephrine in patients
with NMS have produced contradictory results. Although some studies
have reported moderate elevations,20 others have found
normal23 or even decreased6 12 24 25 plasma
norepinephrine levels preceding syncope. One detailed study
of the sympathetic responses during tilt12 documented that
when compared with controls, a blunted maximal increase in
norepinephrine levels was observed in NMS patients (Figure 4
).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Changes in plasma catecholamine levels
produced by tilt in controls and in patients with syncope. The figure
shows the supine (SUP) levels of catecholamines and the
maximal increases in plasma catecholamines evoked by tilt
(TLT) in control subjects (CON), subjects with recurrent syncope (SYN),
and subjects with syncope only during tilt (FS+). Reproduced with
permission from Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Fernandez-Violante R, et
al. Sympathetic and baroreceptor reflex function in neurally mediated
syncope evoked by tilt. J Clin Invest.
1997;99:27362744.
|
|
In part, all these dissimilar results6 12 20 23 24 25 may be
explained by methodological limitations. Changes in synaptic
norepinephrine only subsequently result in changes in
norepinephrine levels in the peripheral
circulation. This makes the time of blood sampling a source of
significant variability. Likewise, changes in the rate of
norepinephrine clearance or in spillover to the general
circulation,26 which are likely to develop during
hypotension, may also account for the variable concentrations of
this neurotransmitter. Furthermore, the interpretation of plasma
norepinephrine samples is meaningless without the proper
consideration of associated hemodynamic
factors.27 While standing, 2- to 3-fold increases in
plasma norepinephrine are normal.27 However,
similar increments in norepinephrine will be inappropriate
in subjects experiencing hypotension.
Norepinephrine Spillover Determinations
Using total and cardiac norepinephrine spillover,
some investigators have recorded decreases in
norepinephrine release during syncope26 or
blunted increases in the response to orthostatic stress in
patients who subsequently developed syncope.25 Increases
in sympathetic activity in these studies, however, cannot be completely
excluded because these reports did not obtain temporal determinations
of norepinephrine spillover.
Sympathetic Nerve Traffic Recordings
Microneurography has been used to study sympathetic responses in
NMS because it can continuously assess neural sympathetic traffic.
Initial reports presented only microneurographic tracings from
either healthy volunteers28 29 30 or from one patient not
suffering from postural NMS.31 These reports were
anecdotal and did not account for the reciprocal relationship between
BP and sympathetic outflow. More systematic studies in NMS patients
have now clearly shown that muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA)
does not increase before syncope.12 32 33 In one of these
studies,12 the investigators recorded MSNA in subjects
who consistently experienced postural NMS, both spontaneously
and during tilt. The microneurographic responses of NMS patients were
characterized by blunted MSNA increases during tilt followed by a
progressive reduction until total disappearance a few seconds before
syncope (Figure 5
). In clear contrast,
normotensive controls exhibited significant increases in MSNA in
response to orthostatic stress that were well maintained
for the entire period of tilt.12 Interestingly, in
subjects who only experienced syncope while undergoing tilt
(false-positive), the microneurographic response was apparently
exaggerated, with a more sudden withdrawal before syncope (Figure 6
).12 One important
conclusion from this study was the concept that the sympathetic
responses to orthostatic stress are entirely different in
patients with spontaneous NMS and in subjects who experience syncope
only during tilt. This indicates that many observations obtained from
so called vasovagal episodes in healthy control subjects cannot be
readily extrapolated to patients with recurrent NMS.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Responses to tilt in a patient with recurrent NMS.
The tracings correspond to recordings of integrated MSNA, BP,
and heart rate (HR) obtained from a 38-year-old white woman in the
supine position (0°) and at different tilt angles. Note the almost
absent increase in MSNA at 15° and 30° and the progressive
inhibition until total disappearance at 75°. The apparent MSNA
increase at 45° and 60° developed in the presence of pronounced
hypotension and is clearly blunted, as demonstrated by a comparison
with responses obtained in normal subjects. The arrows indicate the
time of syncope.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Hemodynamic and microneurographic
responses of a subject with a negative history of fainting but an
abnormal response to upright tilt. Abbreviations and layout as in
Figure 5 . The asterisk represents an artifact resulting
from seizure-like activity during unconsciousness. The arrow indicates
the time of syncope.
|
|
Failure to record increases in MSNA preceding syncope has
also been reported by others, either during tilt34 or
during lower-body negative pressure32 (LBNP).
Nevertheless, it can be argued that recordings of MSNA may not
reflect the noradrenergic changes evoked in other
relevant regions (ie, heart). However, it is important to note that at
least one study documented decreases in the total, cardiac, and renal
norepinephrine spillover of subjects experiencing
NMS,26 which agrees with the microneurographic
recordings discussed above. In addition, others have shown both
a progressive decrease in subcutaneous blood flow, consistent
with progressive sympathetic withdrawal before the onset of
syncope,35 and a reduced cardiac sympathetic tone in NMS
when evaluated with spectral analysis of heart rate
variability.36
Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability
During tilt, NMS patients exhibit increased vagal cardiac
activity,36 37 with variable responses in cardiac
sympathetic function. While some investigators have found that cardiac
sympathetic tone increases before syncope,38 others have
found the opposite36 or even evidence for
both37 (increase or decrease, depending on the individual
subject). Currently, it is not clear whether differences in methodology
and/or the selection of patients may account for these
discrepancies.
Manipulation of Sympathetic Tone
An attractive way to test the ventricular theory is to
investigate whether sympathetic stimulation is an essential requirement
for the development of NMS. The rationale behind this notion is that an
increase in sympathetic outflow should worsen NMS, whereas a reduction
in sympathetic tone could potentially prevent it. Recently,
Mosqueda-Garcia et al33 demonstrated (contrary to what
would have been expected with the ventricular theory) that
the increase in sympathetic tone evoked by yohimbine enhanced
orthostatic tolerance and prevented syncope in most NMS
patients tested.33 Accordingly, a reduction in sympathetic
tone by clonidine resulted in a worsening of the tilt-induced syncope.
Overall, these results strongly indicate that increased sympathetic
activity is not a prerequisite for the development of NMS, and
alternative mechanisms should be sought to explain this syndrome.
 |
Baroreflex Dysfunction Theory
|
|---|
Several other authors have advocated defective baroreflex function
as
a potential mechanism accounting for the development of
NMS.
12 25 39
Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation
Studies in animals have demonstrated that
hemorrhage-induced sympathetic inhibition and hypotension could
be prevented by the deafferentation of carotid
baroreceptors.40 In humans, the stimulation of carotid
baroreceptors resulted in smaller reflex heart rate responses in
patients in whom hypotension was detected during a 20-minute tilt-table
test.41 Another study42 indicated that
individuals with a history of vasovagal reactions displayed greater
baroreflex sensitivity. These 2 studies,41 42 however, did
not use classic additional methods of testing baroreflex function,
which would have complemented their observations.
Cardiopulmonary Baroreceptors
Sneddon and collaborators43 studied baroreflex
function in patients with recurrent NMS and with positive or negative
responses to tilt. Although no differences were seen for
arterial high pressure baroreflexes between tilt-positive
and tilt-negative NMS patients, the increase in forearm vascular
resistance in response to LBNP was greater in the tilt-positive
patients.43 They concluded that some NMS patients have
augmented cardiopulmonary baroreceptor responses.
Interpretations of these results, however, are hampered by the absence
of a negative control group (subjects without a history of syncope and
a negative tilt table test) and by their estimation of baroreflex
responses using only vasopressor stimulation.
In a different study, Jacobs and colleagues25 reported
that subjects experiencing syncope during -40 mm Hg of LBNP
exhibited an already abnormal response to nonhypotensive negative
pressures. This response was characterized by a failure of forearm
norepinephrine spillover to increase. Their results are
indicative of an abnormal resetting of baroreflex function and/or
altered responses of low-pressure baroreceptors.
Integrated Baroreflex Evaluation
Thomson et al44 performed a comprehensive assessment
of baroreflex function in controls and in patients with spontaneous NMS
(reproduced by tilt table examination). In NMS patients,
cardiopulmonary receptor sensitivity was severely impaired, as
indicated by the absence of forearm vasoconstriction or, in some
subjects, by the development of paradoxical forearm vasodilation during
nonhypotensive LBNP. When arterial baroreceptor sensitivity
was investigated, a trend for reduced sensitivity was observed in NMS
patients compared with controls.44
Baroreflex abnormalities in NMS may be better documented by a
definition of the entire sigmoidal baroreflex curve. Mosqueda-Garcia et
al12 investigated baroreflex sensitivity on cardiac vagal
and muscle sympathetic fibers by stepwise infusions of
phenylephrine (linear and saturation parts of the curve)
and sodium nitroprusside (threshold and linear parts). Subjects with
recurrent NMS and positive tilt-table tests had reduced cardiac and
sympathetic baroreflex responses when compared with controls (Figure 7
). Other authors have also found
pronounced reductions in baroreflex sensitivity in NMS patients with
positive tilt reactions when compared with patients with negative tilt
tests (Figure 8
).39 In a
subsequent report, the same authors found evidence of reduced vagal
baroreflex gain during pressure reduction/elevation sequences but
intact function with the pressure elevation/reduction
algorithm.34 They indicated that patients who experienced
NMS during tilt have subnormal vagal baroreflex responses to pressure
changes below baseline but no evidence of vagal and sympathetic
baroreflex malfunction during tilt.34 These later
conclusions contrast somewhat with the observations discussed
above.12 39 Although the reasons for these discrepancies
are not clear, it is important to note that in the later
article,34 the authors performed a different type of
analysis (integrated evaluation over 3 mm Hg pressure
ranges), did not have a "true" control group (all the study
subjects had experienced spontaneous syncope; patients either fainted
[positive] or not [control] during their tilt), and all but 2 of
the presyncopal patients in whom microneurography was obtained required
isoproterenol to induce syncope.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Baroreflex slopes obtained in control subjects
(Con), patients with recurrent syncope (Syn), and false-positive
subjects (FS+). The bars represent the mean slope value
determined by correlating the changes in R-R interval with
systolic BP (slope, ms/mm Hg) or the changes in MSNA with
diastolic BP (slope, bursts ·
min-1 · mm Hg-1); these changes
were evoked by increasing infusions of phenylephrine and
sodium nitroprusside. Reproduced with permission from Mosqueda-Garcia
R, Furlan R, Fernandez-Violante R, et al. Sympathetic and baroreceptor
reflex function in neurally mediated syncope evoked by tilt.
J Clin Invest. 1997;99:27362744.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. Scatterplot depicting baroreflex slopes in 30
patients with positive head-up tilt-table tests resulting in syncope
(Hut[+]) and 30 patients with negative head-up tilt-table tests
(Hut[-]). Reproduced with permission from Ellenbogen KA, Morillo CA,
Wood MA, et al. Neural monitoring of vasovagal syncope. Pacing
Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:788794.
|
|
Some authors have suggested that baroreflex function is preserved but
suddenly suppressed by a depressor reflex originating in the
heart.30 In contrast, one study found significant
spontaneous baroreflex function alterations in NMS patients on
assumption of the upright position.12 This study
demonstrated that when compared with controls, NMS patients have
important reductions in the baroreflex correlation slopes between heart
rate and systolic BP (Figure 9
)
or between MSNA and central venous pressure (Figure 10
) during upright tilt.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10. Relationship between changes in MSNA and changes
in central venous pressure (CVP) during upright tilt. The symbols
represent the plotted values and the lines, regression lines
obtained from the correlation. Symbols are as in Figure 9 .
Reproduced with permission from Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R,
Fernandez-Violante R, et al. Sympathetic and baroreceptor reflex
function in neurally mediated syncope evoked by tilt. J
Clin Invest. 1997;99:27362744.
|
|
Overall, most of the available articles report some type of baroreflex
dysfunction that is thought to result in the inability to sense or
compensate for changes in gravitational forces in subjects with NMS.
The development of sympathetic withdrawal in NMS, however, may result
from the paradoxical activation of baroreceptors.12 Some
studies have shown baroreceptor resetting leading to sympathoinhibition
during severe hemorrhage.45 In humans, plasma
norepinephrine first increases and then decreases during
progressive reductions of arterial BP.46 In
agreement with the idea of baroreceptor resetting is the observation
that the inhibition of MSNA declines during continuous electrical
stimulation of the carotid sinus nerve in humans.47
Furthermore, the paradoxical activation of arterial
baroreceptors has been documented at very low
pressures.48
 |
Reduced Blood Volume Theory
|
|---|
Some authors have proposed that reduced blood volume is
present
in NMS patients and that syncope can be prevented or
reversed
by the infusion of serum albumin or by antigravity
suit inflation.
49 These observations may explain the
beneficial effects of a
high salt intake
50 or
fludrocortisone treatment
51 for the
prevention or
treatment of NMS. However, others have indicated
that supine total
blood volume does not predict the occurrence
of NMS during
tilt
52 and that plasma volume changes are not
different
between syncope patients and controls. Overall, it
seems that blood
volume redistribution, rather than total blood
volume, is more critical
for the development of NMS.
 |
Neurohumoral Theories
|
|---|
Epinephrine
Pronounced elevations of plasma epinephrine have been
reported
in NMS patients,
12 23 24 and some investigators
have suggested
that epinephrine may play a role in the
hemodynamic events of
this syndrome. During NMS, a
dissociation between the noradrenergic
and the
adrenomedullary response seems to develop. In these
conditions,
epinephrine may produce unopposed vasodilation,
resulting in
severe hypotension. Because isoproterenol has similar
cardiovascular
effects, one could postulate this as the
rationale for its use
in the diagnostic work-up of NMS. No
experimental evidence,
however, is available to support this
possibility. In fact,
authors have been unable to prove that
epinephrine infusions
in susceptible patients reproduce
NMS.
53 Furthermore, it is
unclear whether
epinephrine increases merely as a component
of the stress
response.
Serotonin
One group has proposed that selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors are successful agents for the treatment
of NMS.54 These authors have indicated that
serotonin surges may occur in humans before syncope and
that these inhibitors will decrease the sensitivity of
serotonin receptors, with subsequent prevention of
NMS.54
To date, no strong experimental evidence supports the involvement of
serotonin in NMS. First, the basic studies showing an
elimination of the vasodepressor reflex during hemorrhage used
serotonin synthesis blockers or serotonin
receptor blockers.55 Similar actions have not been
reported with selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors. Second, it may be reasonable to speculate that
in susceptible subjects, an initial increase in central
serotonin levels would aggravate or increase the frequency
of NMS. This has not been reported, despite the extensive use of these
agents. Finally, studies in humans using serotonin receptor
blockers do not show that syncope induced by tilt is
prevented.56 Human studies with different subtypes of
serotonin-receptor antagonists demonstrated a
decreased tolerance to tilt, an acceleration of the development of
hypotension, and a reduction of the sympathetic and adrenomedullary
response to hypotension, without preventing syncope.56
Overall, the potential involvement of serotonin is highly
speculative and has little experimental support.
Renin, Vasopressin, ß-Endorphin, Endothelin, and Nitric
Oxide
Other diverse humoral agents have been implicated in the
pathogenesis of NMS. Increases in plasma levels of
renin,24 vasopressin,57
ß-endorphin,58 endothelin,59 or nitric
oxide6 have been described before the onset of NMS. In
some instances, however, pretreatment with specific receptor
antagonists (ie, naloxone for ß-endorphin)60
or with a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor61
did not prevent the provocation of syncope or the vasodilation
associated with it. In other cases, the increases in plasma
concentrations of these agents (ie, endothelin, vasopressin, and renin)
have not been confirmed, and no evidence is available regarding the
prevention of syncope with selective antagonists (ie,
vasopressin and endothelin).
 |
Active Vasodilation Theory
|
|---|
The hypotension observed in NMS has been proposed to result
from
cholinergic stimulation.
62 Accordingly, the vasodilation
observed
during posthemorrhagic syncope disappears after cervical
sympathectomy.
62 However, the available
recordings of MSNA
12 18 28 31 32 34 63 do not
support the presence of an active sympathetic-cholinergic
mechanism.
Furthermore, cholinergic blockade in individuals
susceptible to NMS
failed to prevent the hypotension.
24
More recently, Dietz et al61 proposed that the skeletal
muscle vasodilation seen during syncope was greater than that caused by
sympathetic withdrawal alone. Because cholinergic, nitric oxide, or
epinephrine stimulation is not essential, they suggest that
still-undiscovered mechanisms are responsible for the vasodilation
observed in NMS. In contrast, others have argued that the disappearance
of sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerve traffic to the skeletal muscle
vascular bed is sufficient to explain vasovagal
reactions.34 Overall, more experimental evidence is needed
to support the involvement of "active" vasodilation in NMS.
 |
Respiration
|
|---|
Frequently, patients developing NMS experience yawning and
hyperventilation.
64 Some studies
11
demonstrated in presyncopal patients that increasing
the depth of
respiration results in an enhancement of BP oscillations.
Furthermore,
others have indicated that yawning and altered breathing
patterns
may result in an inhibition of sympathetic nerve
activity
65 or that the hypocapnia associated
with hyperventilation enhances
the vasodepressor
response.
66 More recently, however, one study
indicated
that vasomotor instability before syncope does not
relate to
alterations in respiration.
67
 |
Cerebral Blood Flow Dysregulation
|
|---|
More than 35 years ago, some authors indicated that patients
with
NMS exhibited an abnormal cerebral vascular response to
orthostatic
stress,
68 which may be implicated
in the pathophysiology of
this syndrome. Supporting this concept are
the findings of cerebral
vasoconstriction and reduced cerebral blood
flow in NMS patients.
69 In a more recent
report,
69 researchers speculated that abnormal
baroreceptor
responses initiated during the depressor response resulted
in
impaired cerebral autoregulation. These findings raise the
possibility
that abnormalities within the central nervous system play a
pivotal
role in the pathogenesis of NMS.
 |
Conclusions
|
|---|
The exact mechanisms responsible for the development of NMS
remain
unresolved. The activation of ventricular afferents cannot
explain
many clinical and experimental observations. Furthermore, many
postulates
of the ventricular theory are not
present in patients suffering
from spontaneous recurrent episodes
of NMS. The notion that
NMS is a uniform syndrome that can be
reproduced in any healthy
subject is also no longer believable.
Although the ventricular
theory may explain the development
of hypotension and bradycardia
in healthy subjects, other mechanisms
are at play in patients
with recurrent NMS. In patients with recurrent
NMS, central
or peripheral baroreceptor reflex
abnormalities or alterations
in neurohumoral mechanisms may play a
pivotal role. Not only
is more research needed to delineate the
mechanisms responsible
for this syndrome, but this research must be
performed in actual
patients with the disease. It will not be
surprising if what
we now call NMS is ultimately recognized as the
final clinical
expression of multiple different conditions that are
still poorly
characterized.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Savage DD, Corwin L, McGee DL, et al.
Epidemiologic features of isolated syncope: the Framingham study.
Stroke. 1985;16:626629.[Abstract]
-
Sutton R, Petersen M, Brignole M, et al. Proposed
classification for tilt induced vasovagal syncope. Eur JCPE. 1992;3:180183.
-
Fitzpatrick AP, Theodorakis G, Vardas P, et al. The
incidence of malignant vasovagal syndrome in patients with recurrent
syncope. Eur Heart J. 1991;12:389394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maloney JD, Jaeger FJ, Fouad-Tarazi FM, et al.
Malignant vasovagal syncope: prolonged asystole provoked by head-up
tilt. Cleve Clin J Med. 1988;55:542548.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mosqueda-Garcia R. Central autonomic regulation. In:
Robertson D, Low PA, Polinsky R, eds. Primer on the Autonomic
Nervous System. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996:311.
-
Kaufmann H. Neurally mediated syncope: pathogenesis,
diagnosis, and treatment. Neurology. 1995;45(suppl
5):s12s18.
-
Glick G, Yu PN. Hemodynamic changes
during spontaneous vasovagal reactions. Am J Med. 1963;34:4251.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hargreaves AD, Muir AL. Lack of variation in venous
tone potentiates vasovagal syncope. Br Heart J. 1992;67:486490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mayerson HS, Burch GE. Relationships of tissue
(subcutaneous and intramuscular) and venous pressure to syncope induced
in man by gravity. Am J Physiol. 1940;128:258265.
-
Thomson HL, Atherton JJ, Khafagi FA, et al. Failure of
reflex venoconstriction during exercise in patients with vasovagal
syncope. Circulation. 1996;93:953959.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Epstein SE, Stampfer M, Beiser GD. Role of capacitance
and resistance vessels in vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 1968;37:524533.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Fernandez-Violante R, et
al. Sympathetic and baroreceptor reflex function in neurally mediated
syncope evoked by tilt. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:27362744.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mark AL. The Bezold-Jarisch reflex revisited: clinical
implications of inhibitory reflexes originating in the
heart. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:90102.[Abstract]
-
Sharpey-Schafer EP. Emergencies in general practice:
syncope. BMJ. 1956;1:506509.
-
Almquist A, Goldenberg IF, Milstein S, et al.
Provocation of bradycardia and hypotension by isoproterenol and upright
posture in patients with unexplained syncope. N Engl J
Med. 1989;320:346351.[Abstract]
-
Oberg B, Thoren P. Increased activity in left
ventricular receptors during hemorrhage or
occlusion of caval veins in the cat: a possible cause of the vasovagal
reaction. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972;85:164173.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Morita H, Vatner SF. Effects of hemorrhage on
renal nerve activity in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1985;57:788793.[Abstract]
-
Scherrer U, Vissing S, Morgan BJ, et al. Vasovagal
syncope after infusion of a vasodilator in a heart-transplant patient.
N Engl J Med. 1990;322:602604.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shaleev Y, Gal R, Tchou PJ.
Echocardiographic demonstration of decreased left
ventricular dimensions and vigorous myocardial contraction
during syncope induced by head-up tilt. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1991;18:746751.[Abstract]
-
Fitzpatrick AP, Williams T, Ahmed R, et al.
Echocardiographic and endocrine changes during
vasovagal syncope induced by prolonged head-up tilt. Eur
JCPE.. 1992;2:121128.
-
Novak V, Honos G, Schondorf R. Is the heart empty at
syncope? J Auton Nerv Syst. 1996;60:8392.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lee TM, Chen MF, Su SF, et al. Excessive myocardial
contraction in vasovagal syncope demonstrated by
echocardiography during head-up tilt. Clin
Cardiol. 1996;19:137140.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sra JS, Murthy V, Natale A, et al. Circulatory and
catecholamine changes during head-up tilt testing in
neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:3337.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goldstein DS, Spanarkel M, Pitterman A, et al.
Circulatory control mechanisms in vasodepressor syncope. Am
Heart J. 1982;104:10711075.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jacobs MC, Goldstein DS, Willemsen JJ, et al.
Neurohumoral antecedents of vasodepressor reactions. Eur J
Clin Invest. 1995;25:754761.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Esler MD, Jennings G, Lambert G, et al. Overflow of
catecholamine neurotransmitters to the circulation: source,
fate and functions. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:963985.[Free Full Text]
-
Mosqueda-Garcia R. Evaluation of autonomic failure. In:
Burnstock G, ed. Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System.
Luxembourg: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1995:2560.
-
Wallin BG, Sundolf G. Sympathetic outflow to muscles
during vasovagal syncope. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1982;6:287291.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Smith ML. Mechanisms of vasovagal syncope: relevance to
postflight orthostatic intolerance. J Clin
Pharmacol. 1994;34:460465.[Abstract]
-
van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W, Karemaker JM, et al. The
vasovagal response. Clin Sci.. 1991;81:575586.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yatomi A, Iguchi A, Uemura K, et al. A rare case of
recurrent vasodepressive attacks of 2-hours duration: analysis
of the mechanism by muscle sympathetic nerve activity
recording. Clin Cardiol. 1989;12:164168.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hayoz D, Noll G, Passino C, et al. Progressive
withdrawal of muscle nerve sympathetic activity preceding vasovagal
syncope during lower-body negative pressure. Clin Sci.
1996;91(suppl):5051.
-
Mosqueda-Garcia R, Fernandez-Violante R, Snell M, et
al. Yohimbine in neurally mediated syncope:
pathophysiological implications. J Clin
Invest. 1998;102:18241830.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Morillo CA, Eckberg DL, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Vagal and
sympathetic mechanisms in patients with orthostatic
vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 1997;96:25092513.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Benditt DG, Chen M, Hansen R, et al. Characterization
of subcutaneous microvascular blood flow during tilt table-induced
neurally mediated syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:7075.[Abstract]
-
Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Jones DL, et al. Time and
frequency domain analyses of heart rate variability during
orthostatic stress in patients with neurally mediated
syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:12581262.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Furlan R, Piazza S, DellOrto S, et al. Cardiac
autonomic patterns preceding occasional vasovagal reactions in healthy
humans. Circulation. 1998;98:17561761.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lipsitz LA, Mietus J, Moody GB, et al. Spectral
characteristics of heart rate variability before and during postural
tilt: relations to aging and risk of syncope. Circulation. 1990;81:18031810.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ellenbogen KA, Morillo CA, Wood MA, et al. Neural
monitoring of vasovagal syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:788794.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Castenfors J, Sjostrand T. Circulatory control via
vagal afferents: adjustments of heart rate to variations of blood
volume in the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972;84:347354.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wahbha MMAE, Morley CA, Al-Shamma YMH, et al.
Cardiovascular reflex responses in patients with
unexplained syncope. Clin Sci. 1989;77:547553.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Alder PSJ, France C, Ditto B. Baroreflex sensitivity at
rest and during stress in individuals with a history of vasovagal
syncope. J Psychosom Res. 1991;35:591597.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sneddon JF, Counihan PJ, Bashir Y, et al. Assessment of
autonomic function in patients with neurally mediated syncope:
cardiopulmonary baroreceptor responses to graded
orthostatic stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:11931198.[Abstract]
-
Thomson HL, Wright K, Frenneaux M. Baroreflex
sensitivity in patients with vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 1997;95:395400.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Victor RG, Thoren P, Morgan DA, et al. Differential
control of adrenal and renal sympathetic nerve activity during
hemorrhagic hypotension in rats. Circ Res. 1989;64:686694.[Abstract]
-
Eckberg DL, Harkins SW, Fritsch JM, et al. Baroreflex
control of plasma norepinephrine and heart period in
healthy subjects and diabetic patients. J Clin Inv. 1986;78:366374.
-
Wallin BG, Sundlof G, Delius W. The effect of carotid
sinus nerve stimulation on muscle and skin nerve sympathetic activity
in man. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1975;358:101110.
-
Landgren S. On the excitation mechanism of the carotid
baroreceptors. Acta Physiol Scan. 1952;26:134.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bergenwald L, Freyschuss U, Sjostrand T. The mechanism
of orthostatic and hemorrhagic fainting. Scand J
Clin Lab Invest. 1977;37:209216.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
El-Sayed H, Hainsworth R. Salt supplement increases
plasma volume and orthostatic tolerance in patients with
unexplained syncope. Heart. 1996;75:134140.