(Circulation. 2000;102:218.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics (M.F., P.M.W.), and the Department of Radiology (A.H., J.H.), The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa. 19104.
Correspondence to Mark A. Fogel, MD, The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Cardiology, 34th St and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsMagnetic resonance tissue tagging was performed in 11 normal infants to determine regional diastolic strain and wall motion. Tracking diastolic motion of the intersection points and finite strain analysis yielded regional rotation, radial displacement, and E1 and E2 strains at 3 short-axis levels (significance was defined as P<0.05). E2 "circumferential lengthening" strains were significantly greater at the lateral wall, regardless of short-axis level, whereas E1 "radial thinning" strains were similar in all wall regions at all short-axis levels. In general, no differences were noted in strain dispersion within a wall region or in endocardial/epicardial strain at all short-axis levels. At all short-axis levels, septal radial motion was significantly less than in other wall regions. No significant differences in radial wall motion between short-axis levels were noted. Rotation was significantly greater at the apical short-axis level in all wall regions than in other short-axis levels, and it was clockwise. At the atrioventricular valve, septal and anterior walls rotated slightly clockwise, whereas the lateral and inferior walls rotated counterclockwise.
ConclusionsDiastolic biomechanics in infants are not homogeneous. The lateral walls are affected most by strain, and the septal walls undergo the least radial wall motion. Apical walls undergo the most rotation. These normal data may help in the understanding of diastolic dysfunction in infants with congenital heart disease.
Key Words: rotation diastole biomechanics infant magnetic resonance imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies describing the flow patterns in normal children16 17 are key in understanding the altered diastolic function in disease states. Similarly, understanding the normal diastolic patterns of strain and regional wall motion is another important step forward. Little is known of these normal diastolic patterns in infants, and the present study was undertaken to determine this using MRI tissue tagging (specifically, spatial modulation of magnetization [SPAMM]).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRI
Studies were performed on a Siemens 1.5 Tesla Vision system. All
patients were monitored with pulse oxymetry, ECG, and by direct
visualization via television. Our scanning protocol for systole has
been previously described in great detail,18 19 20 and the
procedure used in this study was similar, but modified for
diastole.
Briefly, after localizers were performed, T1-weighted transverse images were acquired throughout the thorax to evaluate cardiovascular anatomy. Standardization and localization of the short axis of the left ventricle was performed using the transverse images. The long axis of the left ventricle was chosen by a line passing between the center of the mitral valve in the anteroposterior plane (at the left edge of the aortic root) and the left ventricular apex. The short axis was perpendicular to this. Myocardial tagging with image acquisition was then done.
A high temporal resolution (20 ms) cine sequence was performed through the left ventricular outflow tract to determine the timing of end systole, which was defined as aortic valve closure. Three short-axis levels were chosen for SPAMM imaging; they were (1) one-fourth of the way from the atrioventricular valve to the apex (designated "atrioventricular valve"), (2) half of the way from the atrioventricular valve to the apex (designated "mid"), and (3) three-fourths of the way from the atrioventricular valve to the apex (designated "apex").
Myocardial Tagging
The type of tissue tagging used in this study was the SPAMM
sequence, which has been previously described,21 22 23 and
not the radial tag technique.24 Briefly, SPAMM imaging
makes use of a prepulse sequence, applied immediately after the R wave,
which saturates 2 series of parallel stripes perpendicular to each
other (generated by 5 radiofrequency pulses separated by field
gradients). In-plane cardiac movement displaces and distorts these
"cubes of magnetization"18 19 20 (Figure 1
), and tracking this motion enables the
measurement of strain and wall motion. We acquired 6 gradient-echo
images throughout diastole starting immediately after the
SPAMM prepulse with the following parameters: repetition
time was the R-R interval (range, 300 to 650 ms), the flip angle was
30o, thickness was 4 to 7 mm, inversion time
was 16 ms, the number of excitations was 2, the matrix size was
256x256, and the field of view was 160 to 250 mm.
End-diastole was determined by the R wave on ECG. The
separation of the grid lines was selected to allow 2 to 3 lines between
endocardial and epicardial surfaces (ie, 3 to 4 rows of cubes). Black
band (tag) width was
1 to 1.5 mm.
|
Image and Data Analysis
Images were analyzed on a Sun SPARC 10 workstation (Sun
Microsystems) using the VIDA (Volumetric Image Display and
Analysis)25 software package. Evaluation of wall
motion and strain has also been previously
described,18 19 20 and the Appendix in our previous
investigation details the mathematics of strain
calculations.19 In brief, the initial step was to track
the magnetically tagged grid intersections through
diastole. Delaunay triangulation26 27 was used
to create the triangular grid automatically from the intersections,
providing uniform, nonoverlapping triangles. The centroid of each
triangle was used to compute regional wall motion. The regional
deformations of the myocardium were then characterized
using homogeneous finite strain analysis on the
deforming triangles.18 19 20 28 29 30 31 This methodology has
been validated in a phantom21 and was used in vivo by
Young et al.31 These studies demonstrated that
homogeneous strain analysis produced unbiased
estimates of the principal strains, principal angles, and orientations
of the principal axes.
Wall Motion
As described previously,18 19 20 the elements used in
calculating wall motion in 2 dimensions include the (x, y)
coordinates of the centroid of all triangles for each
diastolic image and the ventricular cavity
centroid based on the endocardial border (Figure 1
).
Rotation and radial lengthening were then measured using the
motion of the centroid of the triangles relative to the centroid of the
ventricular cavity. How far the muscle moved away from the
ventricular cavity centroid (radial motion) from phase n to
phase n+1 (where n increases as diastole progresses) is
described by equation 1
.
![]() | (1) |
![]() |
Rotation was calculated by finding the angle
made by 2 vectors
drawn from the ventricular cavity centroid to the centroid
of the triangle at phases n and n+1, as described in equation 2
.
![]() | (2) |
The definition of twist in the literature is controversial. Some investigators define twist as a rotation of one plane relative to another,32 and others define twist as a rotation of the plane with "respect to their initial positions and the center of gravity."33 This study measures the latter, which we term rotation.
Wall motion data were displayed graphically (see Figure 1
). Dots are the location of the centroid of the triangle at
end-systole, and tails represent the subsequent motion in
diastole. The myocardial wall was divided into standard
anatomic regions (septal, inferior, lateral, and anterior
walls) using the papillary muscles and other anatomic landmarks from
the transverse images as references to perform the
analysis.
Homogeneous Finite Strain Analysis
This study uses a 2D strain approach (Figure 1
). The
mathematics of the homogeneous strain analysis is
outlined in the Appendix of our previous investigation.19
Briefly, the complex deformation patterns of the
myocardium, as described by continuum
mechanics29 (using homogeneous finite strains
to characterize 2D shape changes of the magnetically tagged grids),
have been used by us18 19 20 and others.31 This
approach assumes that deformations within each triangle relative to
end-systole are locally homogeneous; this is similar to the
assumption made by Azhari et al.24 After a Lagrangian
(Greens) strain tensor, E, was computed for each triangle, the strain
tensors were diagonalized to be independent of any coordinate system.
The local deformations were described by 2 principal strains
(E1 and
E2) and the orientation of the
principal axes relative to the original coordinate system.
The first principal strain, E1, was
defined as the most negative strain, and the second principal strain,
E2, which was orthogonal to
E1, was defined as the most positive
strain. In diastole, E1 can be
thought of as the "radial thinning" strain, whereas
E2 can be thought of as the
"circumferential lengthening" strain. Strain values reported in
this study were obtained by averaging the strain of all the triangles
within the region. Strain values are reported as mean±SD. Our research
focused on the maximum negative (E1) or
positive (E2) average
diastolic strain in each region that occurred at
end-diastole. The data were quantified and displayed for
qualitative analysis in gray-scale form superimposed onto the
anatomic images (Figure 1
).
Statistics
Comparisons between 2 means and a mean with a hypothesized value
were made using the unpaired, 2-way or 1-way Students t
test and the Wilcoxon ranked sum test. Differences between
various groups of subjects and locations (regional wall location using
short-axis slices from base, mid, or apex) were analyzed by
2-factor ANOVA; repeated measures were used when appropriate.
Comparisons between multiple means within groups was done with 1-way
ANOVA; pairwise comparisons were made using Dunnetts test or the
Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. All measurements are
mean±SD. Intraobserver variability was determined by replicate
measures and used Students t test. A single, trained
observer performed all image analysis steps. Significance was
defined as P<0.05. Statistical analysis was
performed using JMP software, version 3.1.4 (SAS Institute).
To obtain the homogeneity of strain within the region (ie, the dispersion of strain within an entire wall region), the coefficient of variation was used; this used the SD of all the strains within a given region indexed to the average of all strains, as follows. (3) coefficient of variation=SD/average
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Absolute Strain Measures
E2 Strain
Figure 2A
displays strain data
in gray-scale form superimposed on the anatomic image, and Figure 2B
displays the principal circumferential lengthening strain in
graphic format. The lateral wall had significantly higher
E2 strains than other wall regions at all
3 short-axis levels (P<0.05). No differences were noted
between short-axis level for any anatomic wall region.
|
E1 Strain
Figure 3A
displays strain data in
gray-scale form superimposed on the anatomic image, and Figure 3B
displays the principal radial thinning strain in graphic
format. No significant differences between anatomic wall regions were
noted within short-axis levels, nor were significant differences noted
between short-axis level for anatomic walls.
|
Distribution of Strain
Homogeneity of Strain Within a Given Anatomic Region
Only the inferior wall at the
atrioventricular valve level differed (more
heterogeneous) in the distribution of
E2 strains when compared with the other 3
wall regions at that level. Otherwise, at the
atrioventricular valve, mid, or apical short-axis
levels, no significant differences were noted in
E2 (Figure 4A
) or E1
strains (Figure 4B
) between anatomic wall regions within a
short-axis level, nor were significant differences noted between
short-axis level for each anatomic wall.
|
Distribution of Strain Along the Long Axis of the
Ventricle
No significant differences in E2 or
E1 strains were noted between short-axis
level for any anatomic wall region (Figures 2A
and 3A
).
Wall Motion
Rotation
Figure 5A
depicts the rotation
motion in the short axis of normal infants in graphic format, whereas
Figure 5B
displays the data quantitatively. Intraobserver
variability was 5.4±2.2%. At the atrioventricular
valve level (Figure 5B
), normal infant septal and anterior walls
rotated slightly clockwise; this was significantly different from the
lateral and anterior walls at that level, which rotated
counterclockwise. No significant differences in rotation existed
between wall regions at either the mid or apical levels.
|
In general, when comparing rotation for a given wall region between short-axis levels, it was noted that rotation became more clockwise (negative) when moving from the atrioventricular valve to the apex. Indeed, the septal, lateral, and inferior walls rotated significantly more clockwise at the apical level than at the atrioventricular valve level.
Radial Motion
Figure 5A
also depicts the radial motion in the short axis
of normal infants in a graphic format, and Figure 5C
displays
the data quantitatively. Intraobserver variability was 6.1±2.8%. At
all short-axis levels, the septal wall moved significantly less outward
from the centroid of the ventricular cavity than did any
other wall region (P<0.05). When comparing radial outward
motion for a given wall region between short-axis levels, no
significant differences were noted.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In pediatrics, the task of elucidating normal diastolic parameters is made more complex by the changing nature of the heart with growth and development. In 1995, Harada et al37 demonstrated that both peak E and the flow velocity integral of early diastole increased to reach the levels of older children at the age of 36 months, and these measurements leveled off thereafter. Both BuLock et al38 and Schmitz et al16 also observed a change in Doppler-derived diastolic indices with age, especially with the early filling phase of diastole; their findings were consistent with those of Harada et al.17 In 1998, Harada et al17 published data demonstrating that in infants, the mass/volume ratio was increased and the peak E wave was decreased when compared with those of children aged 1 to 3 years. Because of the overwhelming evidence that infant diastolic mechanics are different from those of older children and adolescents, we limited our study population to infants (<1 year of age).
The diastolic properties of the heart are based on a number of complex, interrelated events, including loading conditions, speed and synchrony of myocardial relaxation, the viscoelastic properties of the ventricle, ventricular-ventricular interactions, and pericardial restraint, to name a few. The most important finding of this study is that infant diastolic biomechanics are not homogenous throughout the short axis of the left ventricle; this is consistent with the emerging notion of "nonuniformity" of the heart in both systolic and diastolic function.39 40 Among the mechanisms for nonuniformity is asymmetric geometry of the heart, with the right ventricle overriding the left ventricle; this affects septal motion and contraction with respect to the lateral wall.41 Regional differences exist in the E2 circumferential lengthening strain, its distribution within a wall region, and radial wall motion and rotation. This is consistent with the nonuniformity of diastolic untwisting found in the dog by Rademakers et al.42
As mentioned earlier, diastole is a very complex mechanical function for the ventricle. Active mechanisms are involved in relaxing the ventricle39 40 (eg, active transport of calcium into the sarcoplasmic reticulum), and passive mechanisms are also at work,39 40 including some directly related to systole (eg, ventricular twisting in systole storing potential energy for untwisting and "suction" of blood into the ventricle in diastole).40 43 44 Regional differences may exist in, for example, transport mechanisms of calcium in the developing infant; these mechanisms may not mature until later on in childhood, and they may explain these findings. In addition, regional systolic ventricular rotation may also be altered in the developing infant; this may account for the diastolic findings of our study.
It is well known that the right ventricles of newborn infants are hypertrophied compared with those of older children and adults. This is thought to be due to the systemic pressure and resistance the right ventricle faces with the patent ductus arteriosus. This hypertrophy recedes over a matter of months, with a concomitant change in fiber architecture. We know that (1) ventricular-ventricular interaction occurs in diastole,45 (2) alterations in right ventricular mechanics affect the left ventricle,46 (3) the right and left ventricles share the septal wall, and (4) the myocardium is a "syncytium of muscle fibers tethered within a collagen network,"47 with muscle fibers in continuity between the right and left ventricles.48 Thus, it is certainly possible that the right ventricular changes occurring during infancy have a mechanical effect on the diastolic properties of the left ventricle. The recent study by Stuber et al33 bears on this issue; it demonstrated (using MRI and the SPAMM technique) that patients with left ventricular hypertrophy due to aortic stenosis had greater untwisting velocities and prolongation of untwisting when compared with normal individuals.33
Strain
This study demonstrated that in the infant left ventricle, the
only real mechanically significant difference (from a strain
standpoint) was the higher circumferential lengthening strain
(E2) at the lateral wall in all 3
short-axis levels; the differences in strain in the other 3 wall
regions were not significant. The lateral wall is the farthest away
from the right ventricle; it is not "tethered" by the right
ventricle, and it does not share a wall with the right ventricle, as is
the case with the septal wall.41 This may be the
explanation for this finding.
It should be noted that the radial thinning strain (E1) and the heterogeneity of both types of strain within a given region (with the exception of the inferior wall at the atrioventricular valve level) and along the long axis of the ventricle did not differ between wall regions.
Wall Motion
As mentioned above, the most striking finding in this study is
that wall regions do not move similarly. In general, it was noted that
rotation became more clockwise (negative) when moving from the
atrioventricular valve to the apex (eg, the
inferior, lateral, and anterior walls rotated significantly
more clockwise at the apical level than at the
atrioventricular valve level). This rotation, by being
more pronounced at the apical rather than the
atrioventricular valve short-axis level, was
consistent with the notion that the myocardium is
less tethered at the apex than at the atrioventricular
valve level, where the atrioventricular valve fibrous
rings may play a role.
Although not statistically significant, a trend existed at all short-axis levels for the anterior wall region to do the most clockwise rotation. This is consistent with the findings of Rademakers et al42 in the dog, in which the percent of untwisting "was significantly greater in the anterior wall region" when compared with the other wall regions.
In addition, our study demonstrated that the septal wall, regardless of short-axis level, moved significantly less outward from the ventricular cavity than did the other wall regions. The explanation may be that both ventricles share the septal wall, and the ventricular-ventricular interaction with the hypertrophied infant right ventricle plays a significant role.45 46 47 48 Another explanation may lie in the fact that the left ventricular septal wall is morphologically different from the free walls in normal individuals.49 The free wall is thickest at the base, and then gradually tapers toward the apex. Compare this with the septum, where "a rounded peak" is formed "at its basal summit, becomes thickest at its midportion," and then, "after thinning a bit, the septum remains relatively constant in thickness and tapers only as it fuses with the apical portion of the free wall."49 This fact likely plays a role in explaining the behavior of the septum.
Limitations
In previous reports,18 19 20 we discussed in great
detail the limitations of acquiring data in fixed planes, as was done
in this study. Again, it must be noted that because our study deals
with slices that are thick relative to the amount of through-plane
motion (as would be anticipated in infants), it is thought that
this limitation would not have an appreciable effect on the
findings.
In addition, as our recent reports have previously discussed,20 2D strain analyses are inherently limited because they exclude the remaining components of the 3D strain tensor as used, for example, by Azhari et al.24 As also noted, however, solutions to 3D strain analysis require a priori knowledge of the deformation to interpolate the data that itself is dependent on assumptions. This may introduce error into the calculations.
As was noted above, this study used homogeneous strain analysis, which assumes that deformation is constant within a given unit. Strains, however, have been known to have some transmural variation. This, therefore, represents the limit of resolution.
Conclusions
Diastolic biomechanics in infants are not
homogeneous. The lateral wall undergoes more wall thinning
strain than other walls. The apical walls were observed to do the most
rotation, and rotation in general became more clockwise when moving
from base to apex. The septal walls at each short-axis level underwent
the least radial wall motion when compared with other wall regions.
These normal data may lay the groundwork for future studies into
diastolic dysfunction in infants with congenital heart
disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 19, 1999; revision received January 24, 2000; accepted February 9, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Snider AR, Gidding SS, Rocchini AP, et al. Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic filling in children with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:921926.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Goren A, Glaser J, Drukker A. Diastolic function in children and adolescents on dialysis and after kidney transplantation: an echocardiographic assessment. Pediatr Nephrol. 1993;7:725728.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Mehta S, Nuamah I, Kalhan S. Altered diastolic function in infants of mothers with gestational diabetes: no relation to macrosomia. Pediatr Cardiol. 1995;16:2427.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Mehta S, Nuamah I, Kalhan S. Altered diastolic function in asymptomatic infants of mothers with gestational diabetes. Diabetes. 1991;40:5660.
6. Schmitt K, Tuler G, Merl M, et al. Early detection of doxorubicin and daunorubicin cardiotoxicity by echocardiography: diastolic versus systolic parameters. Eur J Pediatr. 1995;154:201204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Boucek MM, Mathis CM, Kanakriyeh MS, et al. Serial echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac graft rejection after infant heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993;12:824831.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Li JS, Bengur AR, Ungerleider RM, et al. Abnormal left ventricular filling after neonatal repair of congenital heart disease: association with increased mortality and morbidity. Am Heart J. 1998;136:10751080.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Azancot A, Caudell T, Allen HD, et al. Echocardiographic ventricular shape analysis in congenital heart disease with right ventricular volume or pressure overload. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:520526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Yoshii K, Iwao H, Fukuda S, et al. Left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume and stress-strain relationship in children. Jpn Circ J. 1985;49:385394.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Kimball TR, Witt SA, Khoury PR, et al. Automated echocardiographic analysis of systemic ventricular performance in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9:629636.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Helbing WA, Niezen RA, Le Cessie S, et al. Right ventricular diastolic function in children with pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: volumetric evaluation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:18271835.[Abstract]
13. Moskowitz WB, Schieken RM, Mosteller M, et al. Altered systolic and diastolic function in children after "successful" repair of coarctation of the aorta. Am Heart J. 1990;120:103109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Penny DJ, Rigby ML, Redington AN. Abnormal patterns of
intraventricular flow and diastolic
filling after the Fontan operation: evidence for incoordinate
ventricular wall motion. Br Heart J. 1991;66:375378.
15. Rychik J, Tian ZY. Quantitative assessment of myocardial tissue velocities in normal children with Doppler tissue imaging. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:12541257.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Schmitz L, Koch H, Bein G, et al. Left
ventricular diastolic function in infants,
children, and adolescents: reference values and analysis of
morphologic and physiologic determinants of
echocardiographic Doppler flow signals during
growth and maturation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:14411448.
17. Harada K, Suzuki T, Shimada K, et al. Role of left ventricular mass/volume ratio on transmitral flow velocity patterns from infancy to childhood. Int J Cardiol. 1998;63:914.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Fogel MA, Weinberg PM, Fellows KE, et al. A study in
ventricular-ventricular interaction: single
right ventricles compared with systemic right ventricles in a dual
chambered circulation. Circulation. 1995;92:219230.
19.
Fogel MA, Gupta KB, Weinberg PW, et al. Regional wall
motion and strain analysis across stages of Fontan
reconstruction by magnetic resonance tagging. Am J
Physiol. 1995;269:H1132H1152.
20.
Fogel MA, Gupta K, Baxter MS, et al. Biomechanics of
the deconditioned left ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H1193H1206.
21.
Young AA, Axel L, Dougherty L, et al. Validation of
tagging with MR imaging to estimate material deformation.
Radiology. 1993;188:101108.
22.
Axel L, Dougherty L. MR imaging of motion with spatial
modulation of magnetization. Radiology. 1989;171:841845.
23.
Axel L, Dougherty L. Heart wall motion: improved method
of spatial modulation of magnetization for MR imaging.
Radiology. 1989;172:349350.
24.
Azhari H, Weiss JL, Rogers WJ, et al. A non-invasive
comparative study of myocardial strains in ischemic canine
hearts using tagged MRI in 3-D. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1918H1926.
25. Hoffman EA, Gnanaprakasam D, Gupta KB, et al. VIDA. An environment for multidimensional image display and analysis. Proc SPIE. 1992;1660:694711.
26. De Floriani L. Surface representations based on triangular grids. Vis Comput.. 1987;3:2750.
27. Lee DT, Schachter BJ. Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation. Int J Comput Info Sci. 1980;9:219242.
28.
Beyar R, Sideman S. A computer study of left
ventricular performance based on fiber structure,
sarcomere dynamics, and transmural electrical propagation velocity.
Circ Res. 1984;55:358375.
29.
Waldman LK, Fung YC, Covell JW. Transmural myocardial
deformation in the canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1985;57:152163.
30. Yang SS, Bentivoglio LG, Maranhao V, et al. From Cardiac Catheterization Data to Hemodynamic Parameters. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: FA Davis; 1988:238246.
31.
Young AA, Imai H, Chang NC, et al. Two-dimensional left
ventricular deformation during systole using magnetic
resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization.
Circulation. 1994;89:74052.
32.
Buchalter MB, Weiss JL, Rogers WJ, et al. Non-invasive
quantification of left ventricular rotational deformation
in normal humans using magnetic resonance imaging myocardial tagging.
Circulation. 1990;81:12361244.
33.
Stuber M, Scheidegger MB, Fischer SE, et al.
Alterations in the local myocardial motion pattern in patients
suffering from pressure overload due to aortic stenosis.
Circulation. 1999;100:361368.
34. Appleton RS, Graham TP Jr, Cotton RB, et al. Decreased early diastolic function after indomethacin administration in premature infants. J Pediatr. 1988;112:447451.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Harada K, Tamura M, Ito T, et al. Effects of low-dose dobutamine on left ventricular diastolic filling in children. Pediatr Cardiol. 1996;17:220225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Park CH, Chow WH, Gibson DG. Phase differences between left ventricular wall motion and transmitral flow in man: evidence for involvement of ventricular restoring forces in normal rapid filling. Int J Cardiol. 1989;24:347354.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Harada K, Suzuki T, Tamura M, et al. Role of age on transmitral flow velocity patterns in assessing left ventricular diastolic function in normal infants and children. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:530532.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
BuLock FA, Mott MG, Martin RP. Left
ventricular diastolic function in children
measured by Doppler echocardiography: normal
values and relation with growth. Br Heart J. 1995;73:334339.
39. OLaughlin MP, Fisher DJ. Mechanisms of congestive cardiac failure. In: Garson A Jr, Bricker JT, McNamara DG, eds. The Science and Practice of Pediatric Cardiology. 1st ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1990:248.
40. Braunwald E, Sonnenblick EH, Ross J Jr. Mechanisms of cardiac contraction and relaxation. In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 1992:370372.
41.
Beyar R, Dong SJ, Smith ER, et al.
Ventricular interaction and septal deformation: a model
compared with experimental data. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H2044H2056.
42.
Rademakers FE, Buchalter MB, Rogers WJ, et al.
Dissociation between left ventricular untwisting and
filling: accentuation by catecholamines.
Circulation. 1992;85:15721581.
43.
Beyar R, Yin F, Hausknecht M, et al. Dependence of left
ventricular twist-radial shortening relations on cardiac
cycle phase. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H1119H1126.
44.
Hansen DE, Daughters GT, Alderman EL, et al. Effect of
acute human allograft rejection on left ventricular
systolic torsion and diastolic recoil measured by
intramyocardial markers. Circulation. 1987;76:9981008.
45.
Santamore WP, Lynch PR, Heckman JL, et al. Left
ventricular effects on right ventricular
developed pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1976;41:925930.
46. Santamore WP, Constantinescu M, Vinten-Johansen J, et al. Alterations in left ventricular compliance due to changes in right ventricular volume, pressure and compliance. Cardiovasc Res. 1988;22:768776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Weber KT, Janicki JS, Shroff S, et al. Contractile mechanics and interaction of the right and left ventricles. Am J Cardiol. 1981;47:686695.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Case RB, Berglund E, Sarnoff SJ.
Ventricular function, II: quantitative relationship between
coronary blood flow and ventricular function with
observations on unilateral failure. Circ Res. 1954;2:319325.
49. White WD. Cardiac anatomy and examination of cardiac specimens. In: Emmanouilides GC, Riemenschneider TA, Allen HD, et al, eds. Moss and Adams Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 5th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1995:85.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Liu, M. W. Ashford, J. Chen, M. P. Watkins, T. A. Williams, S. A. Wickline, and X. Yu MR tagging demonstrates quantitative differences in regional ventricular wall motion in mice, rats, and men Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2515 - H2521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Notomi, G. Srinath, T. Shiota, M. G. Martin-Miklovic, L. Beachler, K. Howell, S. J. Oryszak, D. G. Deserranno, A. D. Freed, N. L. Greenberg, et al. Maturational and Adaptive Modulation of Left Ventricular Torsional Biomechanics: Doppler Tissue Imaging Observation From Infancy to Adulthood Circulation, May 30, 2006; 113(21): 2534 - 2541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Carreras, M. Ballester, S. Pujadas, R. Leta, and G. Pons-Llado Morphological and functional evidences of the helical heart from non-invasive cardiac imaging Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S50 - S55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Helle-Valle, J. Crosby, T. Edvardsen, E. Lyseggen, B. H. Amundsen, H.-J. Smith, B. D. Rosen, J. A.C. Lima, H. Torp, H. Ihlen, et al. New Noninvasive Method for Assessment of Left Ventricular Rotation: Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Circulation, November 15, 2005; 112(20): 3149 - 3156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |