(Circulation. 2000;102:2359.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health (G.D., M.G., A.S., C.F.), University of LAquila, LAquila, Italy; and Department of Cardiac Surgery (A.G., P.A.G.), University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Correspondence to Giovambattista Desideri, MD, Università di LAquila, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Sanità Pubblica, Blocco 11, Via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100, LAquila, Italy. E-mail gbdesi{at}freemail.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsEndothelin-1 levels were evaluated with a sensitive radioimmunoassay with previous purification through reverse phase HPLC in 24 patients (3 men and 21 women, mean age 54±7 years) with typical angina, instrumental evidence of ischemia, and normal coronary angiograms both under baseline conditions and after oral glucose load (75 g D-glucose). We also measured plasma nitrite-plus-nitrate levels, a sharp index of endothelial nitric oxide production, and circulating concentrations of the soluble fraction of the endothelial adhesion molecule vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, a well-recognized marker of early endothelial dysfunction. Fourteen healthy subjects (1 man and 13 women, mean age 47±15 years) served as controls. There were no significant differences in baseline plasma endothelin-1 concentrations between patients and control subjects (0.55±0.34 versus 0.48±0.22 pg/mL, P=0.503). Plasma nitrite-plus-nitrate and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentrations were also similar between the 2 groups. After glucose ingestion, circulating endothelin-1 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with cardiac syndrome X than in control subjects (P<0.03 at 60, 90, and 120 minutes).
ConclusionsOur findings show that no basal endothelial damage is present in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Nevertheless, increased responsiveness of endothelin-1 to glucose loading suggests that patients with cardiac syndrome X present an increased susceptibility to releasing endothelin-1 under stressful circumstances.
Key Words: endothelin cell adhesion molecules endothelium-derived factors angina
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Elevated levels of the potent endothelium-derived vasoconstrictive peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1)12 have been found in patients with cardiac syndrome X.13 14 Because ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor of coronary microcirculation15 and a marker of endothelial damage,16 17 18 it was hypothesized that elevated ET-1 levels might be involved in the pathogenesis of microvascular dysfunction in cardiac syndrome X.13 According to this, elevated ET-1 activity was recently found to be associated with reduced coronary vasomotor responses in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms.19 Although a report by Hoffman et al20 confirmed this hypothesis, normal levels of circulating ET-1 and big ET-1 were recently observed in patients with cardiac syndrome X.21 Furthermore, peripheral resistance vessel sensitivity to ET-1 was found to be reduced rather than increased due to ET-1 type A receptor downregulation.21 Thus, the existence of abnormal production of ET-1 in patients with cardiac syndrome X is still under debate.
To elucidate this aspect, we evaluated circulating ET-1 concentrations in patients with cardiac syndrome X through the use of a newly developed sensitive radioimmunoassay with previous reverse phase HPLC extraction.22 23 Moreover, circulating concentrations of nitrite plus nitrate, a sharp index of vascular nitric oxide production,14 23 24 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, a sensitive marker of early endothelial dysfunction,25 26 27 were evaluated. Finally, because oral glucose loading affects circulating levels of ET-128 and because patients with cardiac syndrome X present with abnormal glucose tolerance,29 30 we also measured ET-1 during an oral glucose tolerance test.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 contiguous leads that lasts for >1 minute), normal left and right
ventricular function at rest, the absence of
valvular heart disease and myocardial hypertrophy
on M- and B-mode echocardiography, the absence of
clinical and ultrasonographic evidence of atherosclerotic lesions of
the neck and limb vessels, sitting
systolic/diastolic blood pressure levels of
<140/90 mm Hg in the absence of antihypertensive medications, no
heredity for essential hypertension and/or diabetes, and no concomitant
acute and chronic diseases. All patients had a recent normal coronary angiogram without evidence of focal or diffuse coronary spasm after intracoronary infusion of ergonovine maleate. 201Tl scintigraphy was positive for adenosine-induced regional uptake abnormalities in 12 patients. All patients discontinued cardioactive treatment 10 days before they entered the study. Fourteen women were in menopause; of these women, 5 had undergone surgical hysterectomy in the past (>2 years). None was taking substitutive medications.
Control Group
As previously reported,29 30 14 age-, sex-, and
weight-matched (1 man and 13 women, mean age 47±15 years) healthy
volunteers who had been recruited among the physicians and nurses of
our institution served as controls. None had a genetic predisposition
for hypertension or diabetes. Further, their clinical examinations were
normal, they had no concomitant acute or chronic diseases, and they did
not take any kind of drugs or dietary supplements, including
vitamins, antioxidants, and so on. Their chest
radiography, resting ECG, M- and B-mode
echocardiography, exercise stress test, and
clinical and ultrasound evaluations of the neck and limb vessels were
also normal. Menopause was present in 6 women, and none were taking
substitutive medications.
Glucose Tolerance Test
As previously described,29 patients and control
subjects followed their usual diet until the morning of the study day.
After an overnight fast, they were given a glucose solution to drink
(75 mg D-glucose in 200 mL tap water). Venous blood samples
were taken during fasting and at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes after
the oral glucose load.
This study was approved by our institutional review committee. All subjects gave their informed consent.
Laboratory Measurements
Venous blood samples were obtained from a large antecubital vein
60 minutes after venous catheterization to avoid
interference due to blood stasis.31 Patients and control
subjects remained seated and at rest during this time interval. The
venous catheter was kept patent with saline infusion (0.2 mL/h) until
blood was drawn into chilled EDTA tubes on ice. Plasma was separated by
centrifugation (2000g for 15 minutes at
4°C) and stored at -80°C until assayed.
Plasma ET-1 levels were assessed with reverse phase HPLC followed by radioimmunoassay (Peninsula Laboratories) according to a previously described method.22 23 Intra-assay and interassay variations were <10%. Purification through HPLC allowed us to recognize a single peak that corresponded perfectly to ET-1; neither ET-2, ET-3, nor big ET-1 was present in the HPLC eluates.22 23 The sensitivity of the assay was 0.2 pg/mL. Circulating soluble VCAM-1 concentrations were assessed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R & D Systems).26 27 Nitric oxide activity in plasma was evaluated as nitrite-plus-nitrite concentration according to the well-recognized method based on the use of Griess reagent.23 24
Serum total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations were assessed with enzymatic methods (Boehringer-Mannheim; in the case of HDL cholesterol, after precipitation of LDL cholesterol with phosphotungstate). Serum LDL cholesterol levels were assessed according to the Friedewald method.32 Plasma glucose levels were assessed at baseline and 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes after the oral glucose load according to the glucose oxidation method and with a glucose analyzer II (Beckman Instruments).
Statistical Analysis
Continuous normally distributed data are expressed as mean±1 SD
and were analyzed by 2-way unpaired Students t
test. Proportions were compared by
2 test.
Two-factor ANOVA for repeated measures and 1 factor was used to compare
ET-1 data during glucose tolerance test in patients with cardiac
syndrome X or control subjects. When significant differences were
detected, pairwise comparisons were made by Scheffés
F test. Differences were considered to be statistically
significant at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Baseline circulating ET-1 concentrations did not differ between
patients and control subjects (Figure
, A). After glucose
loading, ET-1 levels increased in both groups and reached statistical
significance compared with baseline values at 60 and 90 minutes
(Figure
, B). However, the increase in ET-1 levels was higher in
patients than in control subjects (Figure
, B). Both under
baseline conditions and at the time of each oral glucose tolerance
test, plasma ET-1 levels did not correlate with heart ratexpressure
product at 1 mm ST-segment depression in patients with
cardiac syndrome X.
|
Nitric oxide production and plasma soluble VCAM-1
concentrations were similar for the patients and control subjects
(Table 1
). No significant changes in the 2 variables were
observed with glucose loading in either group.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the present study contrast with those of previous
reports,13 14 20 in which a significant increase in
baseline ET-1 concentrations was observed in patients with cardiac
syndrome X compared with control subjects. In those studies, patients
were carefully selected, and discrepancies with our results cannot
reflect differences in the study populations. However, in the previous
studies, commercial radioimmunoassays for ET-1 measurements with a
sensitivity of 2 pg/mL were used, and the mean difference between
patients and control subjects was close to 1.0 pg/mL. Thus, it seems
that such a difference, although significant, might be affected by
assay sensitivity. Indeed, monoclonal antibodies against ET-1 markedly
cross-react with ET-2, ET-3, and big ET-1 (
50%,
90%, and
10%, respectively),23 leading to overestimation of
true ET-1 concentrations in biologic fluids. To avoid this cross
reaction, we used the radioimmunoassay after HPLC separation of plasma
samples.22 23 This procedure increased ET-1 sensitivity to
0.2 pg/mL, which allowed us to identify the sample peak that
corresponded to ET-1 alone and to exclude interference with other ETs
and big ET-1. Therefore, discrepancies with the mentioned
studies13 14 20 might reflect the different methodologies
used for ET-1 evaluation.
Of note, our findings are in agreement with those obtained by Newby et al,21 who found in patients with cardiac syndrome X normal baseline levels of ET-1 and stimulated nitric oxide activity. Furthermore, in this study, the vasoconstriction caused by ET-1 correlated inversely with plasma ET-1 concentrations, thus suggesting a reduced responsiveness to exogenous ET-1 that possibly reflected overactivity of the ET-1 system and ET-1 type A receptor downregulation. Interestingly, these authors also found normal baseline plasma levels of von Willebrand factor, a well-recognized marker of endothelial dysfunction,27 36 further supporting the lack of endothelial alterations in patients with cardiac syndrome X.
Although in the present study we found normal baseline ET-1 plasma levels in patients with cardiac syndrome X, it is worth noting that glucose loading, which determines an elevation of ET-1 plasma levels in both insulin-resistant patients27 and healthy subjects,27 caused a significantly higher release of ET-1 in patients with cardiac syndrome X compared with control subjects at 60, 90, and 120 minutes. This finding might be due to a synergistic stimulatory effect of insulin and glucose on ET-1 secretion.22 37 In fact, although insulin is a powerful regulator of ET-1 secretion in vitro,22 insulin alone was not able to stimulate ET-1 secretion when infused intravenously in patients with cardiac syndrome X.14 By contrast, simultaneous infusion of both insulin and glucose significantly increased plasma ET-1 concentration.22 Thus, higher glucose and insulin levels29 30 manifested by patients with cardiac syndrome X compared with control subjects after glucose ingestion are probably responsible for the enhanced ET-1 response to glucose load observed in patients with cardiac syndrome X. In addition, patients with cardiac syndrome X showed a dyslipidemic pattern, which could have influenced ET-1 release. Indeed, both LDL cholesterol and triglycerides are known to stimulate ET-1 secretion in vitro38 39 and in vivo.40 In contrast to this possible explanation of our results, patients with cardiac syndrome X had normal circulating ET-1 concentrations at baseline. However, the fact that the presence of dyslipidemia may represent a sort of metabolic background that favors the enhanced ET-1 response to glucose ingestion cannot be excluded. Further, our patients are not necessarily comparable to those of other series. Although dyslipidemia has often been reported in patients with cardiac syndrome X,14 30 33 34 41 our patients showed a particularly evident degree of association between metabolic and cardiac syndrome X. Therefore, the potential role of dyslipidemia in modulation of ET-1 secretion should be restricted to the subset of patients with cardiac syndrome X who simultaneously manifest a dyslipidemic pattern. In any case, the correlation we found in the present study as well as in previous studies29 30 between metabolic disturbances and cardiac syndrome X cannot reflect selection bias. Indeed, our patients were not previously seen in either the metabolic unit or diabetes department. On the contrary, patients were recruited among consecutive patients who were directly referred to the department of cardiac surgery due to chest pain suspected to be of cardiac origin.
Of note, ET-1 response to glucose loading in cardiac syndrome X is similar to that observed in other insulin-resistant conditions either after glucose ingestion27 or during insulin infusion.42 Despite this, the lack of any additional evidence of endothelial damage both under baseline conditions and after glucose loading in cardiac syndrome X makes ET-1 response to glucose loading a specific pattern of endothelial activation that might contribute to an explanation of the tendency to develop microvascular dysfunction rather than atherosclerotic lesions.
Our data suggest that patients with cardiac syndrome X might have an enhanced tendency to release ET-1 under stress circumstances. According to this, previous data showed an increased release in ET-1 at the peak of exercise testing in patients with syndrome X compared with control subjects.43 Thus, it seems that patients with cardiac syndrome X present an increased susceptibility to different stimuli in the release of ET-1. This latter in turn, by causing vasoconstriction of the coronary microcirculation, may play a role in the pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia and angina in patients with cardiac syndrome X. In addition, exaggerated increments of ET-1 plasma levels after glucose loading could impair insulin-mediated vasodilation and the consequent increase in peripheral glucose uptake,44 thereby contributing to the hyperinsulinemic response to glucose ingestion known to be manifested by patients with cardiac syndrome X.29 30
However, ET-1 represents only 1 of the neurohumoral mediators that affect vascular response in patients with syndrome X. According to this, we did not found any correlation between plasma ET-1 levels and heart ratexpressure product at 1 mm ST-segment depression, an accepted index of coronary vascular response. Although our data seem to contrast with those of the recent report by Cox et al,19 who described higher ET-1 levels associated with reduced coronary vasomotor responses in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms, we agree with Cox et al in their emphasis that ET-1 is primarily a paracrine mediators, with up to 75% secreted into the basolateral side23 (ie, toward the smooth vascular muscle cells), with different release capabilities in different vascular districts. Thus, it is extremely interesting to note that Cox et al found a correlation between plasma ET-1 levels and vasodilator responses during atrial pacing by assaying arterial ET-1 but not venous ET-1. Because we assayed venous ET-1 and used a different method for ET-1 measurements, which is able to eliminate overestimation of true ET-1 levels, a discrepancy between their study might reflect the different methodology used.
| Study Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another potential limitation of the present study is that patients showed a trend toward an older age. This could have influenced both insulin sensitivity47 and circulating ET-1 levels.48 49 However, age-related increase in insulin resistance is determined by increments in body fat.47 Because the body mass index was similar for patients with cardiac syndrome X and control subjects, it is unlikely that the small difference in age between the 2 groups influenced peripheral insulin-mediated glucose extraction. Similarly, small increments in circulating ET-1 levels have been described in healthy subjects with a mean age of >65 years.48 49 Because none of our patients were >65 years old and only 3 were 61 to 64 years old, it seems extremely unlikely that the small difference in age between the patient and control groups, which was also nonsignificant, influenced our findings. In accordance to our interpretation, which is at variance with previous studies in elderly subjects,48 49 baseline ET-1 concentrations were at similar levels in the 2 groups. Thus, the small, nonsignificant difference in age between patients and control subjects does not represent a study bias.
In conclusion, our findings indicate the absence of endothelial activation in patients with cardiac syndrome X under baseline conditions. However, after glucose loading, patients with cardiac syndrome X appear to have an enhanced tendency to release ET-1, thus suggesting an increased susceptibility of vascular endothelium to be activated. Because ET-1 has the potential to affect microvascular tone,12 15 its increased release under stress circumstances might play a role, together with other neurohumoral mediators, in the pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia in patients with cardiac syndrome X.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 26, 2000; revision received June 20, 2000; accepted June 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Grassi, S. Necozione, C. Lippi, G. Croce, L. Valeri, P. Pasqualetti, G. Desideri, J. B. Blumberg, and C. Ferri Cocoa Reduces Blood Pressure and Insulin Resistance and Improves Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Hypertensives Hypertension, August 1, 2005; 46(2): 398 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Senen, M. Ileri, A. Alper, F. Yetkin, R. Atak, I. Hisar, E. Yetkin, H. Turhan, H. Bardakci, and D. Demirkan Increased Levels of Soluble Adhesion Molecules E-Selectin and P-Selectin in Patients with Cardiac Syndrome X Angiology, May 1, 2005; 56(3): 273 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Tomai C reactive protein and microvascular function Heart, July 1, 2004; 90(7): 727 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pizzi, O. Manfrini, F. Fontana, and R. Bugiardini Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase in Cardiac Syndrome X: Role of Superoxide Dismutase Activity Circulation, January 6, 2004; 109(1): 53 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cosin-Sales, C. Pizzi, S. Brown, and J. C. Kaski C-reactive protein, clinical presentation, and ischemic activity in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1468 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gaspardone Endothelin: a new marker of risk of rapid coronary stenosis progression in patients with stable angina? Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2001; 22(17): 1519 - 1520. [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |