Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:2076-2081

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sverrisdóttir, Y. B.
Right arrow Articles by Elam, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sverrisdóttir, Y. B.
Right arrow Articles by Elam, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies

(Circulation. 2000;102:2076.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Sympathetic Neural Burst Amplitude Distribution

A More Specific Indicator of Sympathoexcitation in Human Heart Failure

Yrsa Bergmann Sverrisdóttir, PhD; Bengt Rundqvist, MD, PhD; Gudmundur Johannsson, MD, PhD; Mikael Elam, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Clinical Neurophysiology (Y.B.S., M.E.) and Cardiology (B.R.) and the Research Center for Endocrinology and Metabolism (G.J.), Sahlgren University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

Correspondence to Dr Yrsa Bergmann Sverrisdóttir, Institute for Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Sahlgren University Hospital, S-41345 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail yrsa.sverrisdottir{at}neuro.gu.se


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Human muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is usually measured as the number of pulse-synchronous bursts in multiunit mean voltage recordings. We recently suggested burst amplitude distribution as a more sensitive indicator of altered MSNA in congestive heart failure (CHF). Here, we test whether this distribution can discriminate between different conditions with increased MSNA burst frequency and whether it reflects single vasoconstrictor fiber firing intensity.

Methods and Results—We analyzed resting multiunit MSNA in 36 CHF patients (24 with mild to moderate CHF, 12 with severe CHF investigated before and after heart transplantation), 14 patients with pituitary deficiency, 25 matched healthy control subjects, and an additional 56 healthy men with a wider age range (21 to 71 years). Pituitary deficiency was associated with increased MSNA burst frequency (60 versus 37 bursts/min in control subjects), equivalent to that in mild to moderate CHF (61 bursts/min). However, burst amplitude distribution in hypopituitary patients (median burst amplitude, 37%) did not deviate from matched control subjects (36%), whereas amplitudes increased with disease severity in CHF (43% in mild to moderate, 52% in severe) and normalized after transplantation (36%). In the larger healthy group, MSNA burst frequency increased with age, and burst amplitude distribution remained unaffected. In 8 CHF patients, single-unit firing frequency showed a close positive relationship to multiunit burst amplitude distribution (r=0.82, P<0.01) but none to burst frequency (r=0.39, P=0.3).

Conclusions—Muscle vasoconstrictor fiber activity is better reflected by multiunit MSNA burst amplitude distribution than by burst frequency, at least in CHF. This distribution can discriminate between conditions with increased burst frequency.


Key Words: nervous system, autonomic • heart failure • hormones • aging


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Human muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) arises from vasoconstrictor fibers directed to the muscle vascular bed1 and is involved mainly in dynamic blood pressure regulation. An inhibitory influence from arterial baroreceptors provides a dominating control mechanism for MSNA, resulting in cardiac rhythmicity and an inverse relationship to diastolic blood pressure variations. Quantification of MSNA in intraneural recordings is usually based on counting the neural bursts identified by inspection of a mean voltage neurogram. Burst area or amplitude can be measured to evaluate relative changes in MSNA within a recording session, but absolute measures of burst size cannot be used for interindividual comparisons for technical reasons.2 3 Thus, interindividual or group comparisons of resting MSNA are usually based on burst counts over time (burst frequency) or, when differences in heart rate are accounted for, on bursts per 100 heartbeats (burst incidence). Because of the large interindividual variability of these 2 quantitative measures in healthy subjects,4 moderate differences in MSNA between groups of subjects in cross-sectional studies are difficult to identify.5 However, a recent study from our laboratory6 of patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure (CHF) indicated that the relative burst amplitude distribution is shifted toward larger bursts before the occurrence of a significantly augmented burst frequency, suggesting that analysis of MSNA burst amplitude distribution may provide a more sensitive indicator of altered sympathetic discharge in early stages of CHF.

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that MSNA burst amplitude distribution may also discriminate between conditions with increased MSNA burst frequency by comparing amplitude distributions in multiunit MSNA recordings from 3 conditions known to be associated with a high burst frequency. The first condition was CHF, in which increased MSNA burst frequency is a well-established finding7 8 considered to be at least partly elicited peripherally by malfunctioning baroreflex mechanisms.9 10 Because several studies have shown that the sympathoexcitation in CHF is normalized after orthotopic heart transplantation,11 12 13 14 15 we also analyzed the burst amplitude distribution before and after transplantation. The second group consisted of patients with pituitary deficiency and untreated growth hormone deficiency (GHD), a neuroendocrine disease recently shown to be associated with increased MSNA burst frequency, in all probability of central origin.16 The patient categories were compared with each other and an age-matched healthy control group. Finally, MSNA burst amplitude distribution was investigated in a larger group of healthy men with a wide age range because normal aging is related to an increased MSNA burst frequency.17

To test a second hypothesis, that multiunit MSNA burst amplitude distribution reflects intensity of muscle vasoconstrictor fiber discharge, the distribution was also compared with the activity of single muscle vasoconstrictor fibers previously reported from a subgroup of our CHF patients.18


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
The main study group consisted of 2 patient categories with marked augmentation of MSNA burst frequency and a group of healthy matched control subjects.

Cardiac Failure Patients
Twenty-four patients with mild to moderate cardiac failure (left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.28±0.09) in NYHA II to IIIA were investigated, 6 on the basis of coronary heart disease and 18 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. All the CHF patients and transplant recipients (see below) were investigated without withdrawal of ongoing medication (ACE inhibitors, digoxin, diuretics, nitrates, standard triple immunosuppression, and calcium channel blockers).

Pituitary-Deficient Patients
This group consisted of 14 patients with hypopituitarism caused primarily by nonsecreting pituitary adenomas and its treatment. All patients in this group had untreated GHD as verified by an insulin tolerance test. When appropriate, the patients had received stable replacement therapy with glucocorticoids (n=6), thyroxine (n=8), and gonadal steroids (n=8) >=6 months before the study.

Control Subjects
Twenty-five healthy subjects matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were recruited as MSNA control subjects for the mild to moderate CHF and GHD patient groups (Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Basic Characteristics of the Primary Study Group

Cardiac Transplant Recipients
A separate study group consisting of 12 severe cardiac failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.18±0.08), previously investigated before and after cardiac transplantation (HTx), was reanalyzed to evaluate putative changes in burst amplitude distribution related to the reduction in MSNA burst frequency that occurs after HTx.15 The patients in the severe CHF group were classified as being in NYHA functional class IIIB to IV, 5 with coronary artery disease and 7 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Aging
In addition to the main study group, we also reanalyzed a larger group (n=56) of previously investigated normotensive (mean arterial pressure, 91±10.7 mm Hg), normal-weight (BMI, 24.4±2.5 kg/m2), healthy men (unpublished data) with an age range of 21 to 71 years, (43±18 years) to evaluate the effect of age on the different measures of MSNA.

Comparison With Single-Unit Discharge
Of the above CHF patients, 8 were previously used in a study of the firing characteristics of single muscle vasoconstrictor nerve fibers.18 These data are in the present study compared with the burst amplitude distribution and burst frequency of a multiunit MSNA recording performed in the same experimental session as the previously reported single-unit data. In subjects in whom >1 individual vasoconstrictor nerve fiber was recorded from (2 fibers in 2 patients, 3 fibers in 3), data for >=2 fibers were averaged before comparison with multiunit data from that subject.

The Human Ethics Committee at the University of Göteborg approved the experimental procedures, and all subjects gave their informed consent to the procedure.

General Procedure
All nerve recordings were performed with the subjects in the supine position in the postabsorptive state (>=2 hours after food intake). Resting supine blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer from the left arm at the recording session after >=15 minutes of rest. Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg, and body height was measured barefoot to the nearest 0.01 m. BMI was calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Nerve Recording
Multiunit recordings of efferent postganglionic sympathetic nerve activity were obtained with a tungsten microelectrode with a tip diameter of a few microns inserted into a muscle fascicle of the peroneal nerve posterior to the fibular head. A low-impedance reference electrode was inserted subcutaneously a few centimeters away. When a muscle nerve fascicle had been identified, small electrode adjustments were made until a site was found in which spontaneous pulse-synchronous bursts of neural activity that increased during voluntary apnea but did not respond to arousal stimuli (such as noise or pinching) could be recorded. Details of the nerve recording technique and criteria for MSNA have been reported previously.2 The original nerve signal was amplified with a gain of 50 000 and fed through a band-pass filter with a band width of 700 to 2000 Hz and then through an integrating network with a time constant of 0.1 second to obtain a mean voltage display of nerve activity. Both the filtered and mean voltage neurograms were stored on analog tape (Racal V-Store, Racal Recorders Ltd) and on a computer (sampling frequency, 200 Hz), together with an ECG (via standard chest leads) and respiratory movements (via a strain gauge attached to a rubber strap around the chest). During the experiments, recorded variables were also monitored on a storage oscilloscope (Tektronix 549, Tektronix Beaverton) and an ink-jet recorder (modified Mingograph 800, Siemens-Elema Ltd).

Statistical Analysis
After a stable recording site was acquired, resting MSNA was recorded for 15 to 20 minutes. Data from the last 5 minutes were used for analysis. Bursts were identified by inspection of the mean voltage neurogram, aided by computer software developed in the laboratory, and MSNA was expressed as burst frequency (bursts per minute) and burst incidence (bursts per 100 heartbeats). To obtain a relative burst amplitude distribution, the amplitude of the largest burst that occurred during the analyzed period was set to 100%, and other burst amplitudes were expressed as a percentage of the maximal burst.6 17 19 20 From the burst amplitude distribution, a median burst amplitude (the value at which 50% of the burst amplitudes were larger and 50% were smaller) was extracted and used for statistical analysis.

The results are presented as the mean±SD (range). Comparisons between the study groups were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA median test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test when appropriate. Correlations were examined by calculating the Pearson linear correlation coefficient. P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The subjects in the main study group did not differ in terms of age, sex, or BMI (Table 1Up). The pituitary-deficient patients did not deviate from the control subjects in heart rate but had significantly higher mean arterial pressure (P<0.05). In CHF patients, heart rate increased with disease severity and was high in the denervated heart after HTx. Both CHF groups and the HTx group had significantly higher heart rate than the control subjects and the pituitary-deficient patient group. The mean arterial pressure ranged from lower than that of control subjects in the severe CHF (P<0.001), equal to that of control subjects in mild to moderate CHF (P=0.2), to higher than that of control subjects in the HTx group (P<0.001; Table 1Up).

Differences in MSNA Between CHF and Hypopituitary Patients
Whereas MSNA burst frequency and incidence were increased to a similar degree in both the mild to moderate CHF and hypopituitary patient groups compared with control subjects (Table 1Up and Figure 1Down), the MSNA median burst amplitude was increased only in the CHF patients (P<0.001), and burst amplitude distribution in the hypopituitary patients did not differ from the control subjects (P=0.97). In the CHF group (mild, moderate, and severe), all MSNA parameters increased with disease severity and were significantly reduced after HTx. MSNA burst frequency and median burst amplitude in the HTx group did not differ from the control subjects, whereas MSNA burst incidence was significantly lower (P<0.01).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. MSNA expressed as burst incidence ({square}) and median burst amplitude ({blacksquare}) for different study groups. Note discrepancy between GHD and mild to moderate CHF, in which MSNA burst incidence is augmented to similar degree in both conditions, whereas median burst amplitude is increased only in CHF. Results are mean±SEM; bars show SD.

Age-Related Changes in MSNA
In the larger group of healthy subjects with an age range of 21 to 71 years, MSNA burst frequency and incidence showed a positive relationship with age (r=0.65 and 0.64, respectively; P<0.0005 for both). In contrast, MSNA median burst amplitude remained unchanged throughout the age range (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Simple Correlation Matrix Between Age, Heart Rate, and MSNA for the Whole Cohort of Healthy Men

Relationship Between Multiunit and Single-Unit MSNA
In 8 CHF patients in whom both single-unit18 and multiunit MSNA was analyzed, multiunit burst amplitude distribution was closely correlated to the firing frequency of individual muscle vasoconstrictor nerve fibers (r=0.84, P<0.01; Figure 2Down), whereas no significant correlation was found between single-unit activity and multiunit burst frequency (r=0.39, P=0.3).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. In CHF patients (n=8), firing frequency of single muscle vasoconstrictor fibers (n=16) shows close positive relationship to burst amplitude distribution in multiunit MSNA (r=0.84, P<0.01). Single-unit and multiunit activities were recorded in same experimental session.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main findings of the present study are that (1) the distribution of multiunit MSNA burst amplitudes can discriminate between different conditions with a similar MSNA burst frequency augmentation and (2) the firing frequency of individual vasoconstrictor fibers is related more closely to MSNA burst amplitude distribution than to MSNA burst frequency. This indicates that burst amplitude distribution may be a more sensitive indicator of MSNA intensity, which can be used to distinguish between conditions with sympathetic nerve hyperactivity of different origin.

Burst Amplitude Distribution Illustrates Sympathoexcitation in CHF
The sympathetic activation in CHF is well established,21 22 with increased MSNA7 8 being paralleled by increased total body, renal, cardiac, and central nervous system norepinephrine spillover.13 23 24 25 26 Studies focusing on milder degrees of CHF have found an increased27 or unchanged26 number of MSNA bursts early in the disease. In contrast to the previous study from our laboratory,26 the present study also finds a significant augmentation of MSNA burst number in mild to moderate CHF. This difference between 2 studies from the same laboratory highlights the previously recognized problem5 with a large interindividual variability of MSNA burst number in group comparisons, making subject selection crucial. In fact, the discrepancy between studies of mild CHF recently prompted our first attempt to use MSNA burst amplitude distribution for group comparisons. In agreement with the findings in our present mild to moderate CHF group, the patients in the earlier study from our laboratory26 were subsequently shown to have a greater proportion of large bursts than healthy control subjects, despite not differing in burst number,6 and we suggested that burst amplitude distribution may be a more sensitive indicator of altered discharge intensity than traditional burst counts. This notion is strongly underlined by the present finding that the firing frequency of individual vasoconstrictor fibers is closer related to multiunit burst amplitude distribution than to burst frequency (see also below) in a group of patients with CHF ranging from mild to severe.

The underlying mechanisms for sympathetic hyperactivity in CHF are not fully elucidated, but impaired baroreflex control has been shown in severe9 28 and mild to moderate CHF.27 This impairment of baroreflex restraint of sympathetic neuronal outflow, whether caused by peripheral or central alterations,29 30 has therefore been proposed as one plausible mechanism for the sympathoexcitation characterizing this condition. However, sympathoexcitation as a compensatory response, elicited by still-functioning baroreceptors sensing an increasingly lowered blood pressure, may contribute. The improved hemodynamic situation and the normalization of baroreflex function within weeks after HTx31 could both be responsible for the rapid postoperative reduction in MSNA15 and the normalization of MSNA burst amplitude distribution shown in this study.

Ignoring the present findings concerning the relationship between single-unit firing frequency and multiunit burst amplitude distribution, we could argue that alterations in MSNA burst amplitude distribution are simply a consequence of the decreased beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure or heart rate known to be associated with CHF. Heart rate increases and its variability decreases32 with increasing severity of CHF, but our finding that the MSNA burst amplitude distribution was normalized after HTx, despite heart rate being high and less variable in the transplanted heart, clearly argues against heart rate per se being responsible for the change in MSNA burst amplitude distribution. The diastolic blood pressure variability (determined as the within-person SD) was significantly reduced in the severe compared with the mild to moderate CHF group (P<0.001) but did not differ between mild to moderate CHF and hypopituitary patients, making diminished blood pressure variations a less likely cause for the change in MSNA burst amplitude distribution. In fact, the increased proportion of large MSNA bursts in our mild to moderate CHF patients, despite a blood pressure variability similar to that in hypopituitary patients, may indicate that this change in distribution is reflecting the impairment of baroreflex control over sympathetic outflow.

Burst Amplitude Distribution Is Normal in Other Conditions With High Burst Frequency
Both MSNA burst frequency and burst incidence are known to increase with age,17 a development recently found to be linked to the decrease in secretion of insulin-like growth factor-I levels in somatopause (unpublished observations). Adults with GHD and aging healthy subjects thus share a decline in insulin-like growth factor-I and a rise in MSNA burst frequency.16 Our present finding that MSNA burst amplitude distribution remains unaffected during aging and in hypopituitary patients contrasts the findings in CHF, clearly illustrating that this MSNA variable can be used to discriminate between different conditions characterized by increased MSNA burst frequency. This discrepancy between CHF and aging/hypopituitarism may support the view of McAllen and Malpas33 that sympathetic burst probability and burst amplitude are controlled independently.

The notion that burst amplitude distribution could be maintained by baroreflex modulation agrees well with the fact that baroreflex control of MSNA has been shown to remain unchanged during aging.34 Hypopituitarism and untreated GHD are linked to a higher incidence of hypertension,35 but although our patients had a higher blood pressure than the matched control subjects, they were not hypertensive. Given that impairment of baroreflex function has also been found in hypertension, one could argue that hypopituitary patients (and those with other conditions) who develop significant hypertension eventually should alter their MSNA burst amplitude distribution, if this measure indeed reflects baroreflex modulation. However, in contrast to the impaired baroreflex control of heart rate, the baroreflex control of MSNA has been shown to remain intact in both primary and secondary hypertension.36 37 Thus, the difference in MSNA burst amplitude distribution between CHF and hypopituitary patients would probably persist even if the latter patient group developed hypertension.

Study Limitations
Given the possibility that baroreflex modulation governs MSNA burst amplitude distribution (see above), the lack of a baroreflex test is a limitation of the present study. However, reciprocal changes in MSNA median burst amplitude and blood pressure during pharmacological baroreflex provocations have been demonstrated in normal subjects with intact baroreflex function.6 The present data include reanalysis of several previous studies from our laboratory,15 16 18 precluding the addition of a baroreflex test, and we base our suggestion of baroreflex involvement on the previously published evidence for decreased baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow in CHF that is normalized after HTx and on the evidence for normal sympathetic baroreflex control in aging. Baroreflex control of MSNA is usually investigated with short-term pharmacological interventions, raising blood pressure with phenylephrine and/or lowering blood pressure with nitroprusside.9 34 36 37 38 39 If future studies can establish that the burst amplitude variation at rest is governed by baroreflex modulation, analysis of MSNA burst amplitude distribution may provide a less invasive, and thus safer, test of baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow.

Our conclusion that multiunit MSNA burst amplitude distribution reflects the firing frequency of individual vasoconstrictor neurons, whereas multiunit burst frequency does not, is limited to CHF because no such comparisons were made in hypopituitary or aging subjects. However, in 2 previous reports by Macefield and coworkers on healthy subjects with low40 and high41 multiunit MSNA burst frequency, the average firing frequency of individual vasoconstrictor neurons was lower in the study group with higher multiunit burst frequency. Thus, the poor ability of multiunit MSNA burst frequency to predict the discharge intensity of individual vasoconstrictor fibers seems to be a general phenomenon.

Finally, the fact that ongoing pharmacological treatment was maintained in our CHF patients may be considered a limitation of the study. However, we chose this strategy to avoid rebound cardiovascular responses and associated baroreceptor-mediated effects on sympathetic nerve traffic.

In summary, muscle vasoconstrictor fiber activity is better reflected by multiunit MSNA burst amplitude distribution than by burst frequency. The amplitude distribution can discriminate between conditions with increased MSNA burst frequency of different origin.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Foundation (grant 12170), the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Medical Faculty of Göteborg. We thank Tomas Karlsson and Gun Bodehed-Berg for excellent technical assistance.

Received March 30, 2000; revision received May 19, 2000; accepted June 8, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Wallin BG, Delius W, Sundlöf G. Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity in cardiac arrhythmias. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1974;34:293–300.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Vallbo ÅB, Hagbarth KE, Torebjörk HE, et al. Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev. 1979;59:919–957.[Free Full Text]
  3. Wallin BG, Elam M. Microneurography and autonomic dysfunction. In: Low PA, ed. Clinical Autonomic Disorders: Evaluation and Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997.
  4. Sundlöf G, Wallin BG. The variability of muscle sympathetic activity in resting recumbent man. J Physiol (Lond). 1977;272:383–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Fagius J, Wallin BG. Long-term variability and reproducibility of resting human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest, as reassessed after a decade. Clin Auton Res. 1993;3:201–205.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Sverrisdóttir YB, Rundqvist B, Elam M. Relative burst amplitude in human muscle sympathetic nerve activity: a sensitive indicator of altered sympathetic traffic. Clin Auton Res. 1998;8:95–100.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Leimbach WN, Wallin BG, Victor RG, et al. Direct evidence from intraneural recordings for increased central sympathetic outflow in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1986;73:913–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ferguson DW, Berg WJ, Sanders JS. Clinical and hemodynamic correlates of sympathetic nerve activity in normal humans and patients with heart failure: evidence from direct microneurographic recordings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1125–1134.[Abstract]
  9. Ferguson DW, Berg WJ, Roach PJ, et al. Effects of heart failure on baroreflex control of sympathetic neural activity. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:523–531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ferguson DW, Oren MR. Reflex control in human heart failure. In: Hainsworth R, Mark AL, eds. Cardiovascular Reflex Control in Health and Disease. London, UK: WB Saunders; 1993.
  11. Olivari MT, Levine BT, Ring SR, et al. Normalization of sympathetic nervous function after orthotopic cardiac transplantation in man. Circulation. 1987;76(suppl V):V-62–V-64.
  12. Elam M, Casale R, La Rovere MT, et al. Is sympathetic neural hyperactivity in chronic heart failure affected by heart transplantation? Eur Heart J. 1993;14:521–525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kaye DM, Thompson J, Jennings G, et al. Cyclosporine therapy causes hypertension and renal vasoconstriction without sympathetic activation. Circulation. 1993;88:1101–1109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rundqvist B, Elam M, Eisenhofer G, et al. Normalization of total body and regional sympathetic hyperactivity in heart failure after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15:516–526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Rundqvist B, Casale R, Sverrisdóttir YB, et al. Rapid fall in sympathetic nerve hyperactivity in patients with heart failure after cardiac transplantation. J Card Failure. 1997;3:21–26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Sverrisdóttir YB, Elam M, Herlitz H, et al. Intense sympathetic nerve activity in adults with hypopituitarism and untreated growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:1881–1885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sundlöf G, Wallin BG. Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest: relationship to blood pressure and age. J Physiol (Lond). 1978;274:621–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Macefield VG, Rundqvist B, Sverrisdottir YB, et al. Firing properties of single muscle vasoconstrictor neurones in the sympathoexcitation associated with heart failure. Circulation. 1999;100:1708–1713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wallin BG, Eckberg DL. Sympathetic transients caused by abrupt alterations of carotid baroreceptor activity in humans. Am J Physiol. 1982;H185–H190.
  20. Wallin BG, Victor RG, Mark AL. Sympathetic outflow to resting muscles during static handgrip and postcontraction muscle ischemia. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H105–H110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Thomas JA, Marks BH. Plasma norepinephrine in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:233–243.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, et al. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:819–823.[Abstract]
  23. Hasking GJ, Esler MD, Jennings GL, et al. Norepinephrine spillover to plasma in patients with congestive heart failure: evidence of increased overall and cardiorenal sympathetic nervous activity. Circulation. 1986;73:615–621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Meredith IT, Eisenhofer G, Lambert GW, et al. Cardiac sympathetic nervous activity in congestive heart failure: evidence for increased neuronal norepinephrine release and preserved neuronal uptake. Circulation. 1993;88:136–145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kaye DM, Lambert GW, Dewar EM, et al. Neurochemical evidence of cardiac sympathetic activation and increased central nervous system norepinephrine turnover in severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:570–578.[Abstract]
  26. Rundqvist B, Elam M, Sverrisdóttir YB, et al. Increased cardiac adrenergic drive precedes generalized sympathetic activation in early heart failure. Circulation. 1997;95:169–175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Cattaneo BM, et al. Sympathetic activation and loss of reflex sympathetic control in mild congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995;92:3206–3211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Thames MD, Kinugawa T, Smith ML, et al. Abnormalities of baroreflex control in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:56A–60A.
  29. Mark AL. Sympathetic dysregulation in heart failure: mechanisms and therapy. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18(suppl I):I-3–I-8.
  30. Lambert GW, Kaye DM, Lefkowits J, et al. Increased central nervous system monoamine neurotransmitter turnover and its association with sympathetic nervous activity in treated heart failure patients. Circulation. 1995;92:1813–1818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ellenbogen KA, Mohanty PK, Szentpetery S, et al. Arterial baroreflex abnormalities in heart failure: reversal after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Circulation. 1989;79:51–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Szabo BM, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Brouwer J, et al. Relation between severity of disease and impairment of heart rate variability parameters in patients with chronic congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995;26:1594–1599.
  33. McAllen RM, Malpas SC. Sympathetic burst activity: characteristics and significance. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997;24:791–799.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Ebert TJ, Morgan BJ, Barney JA, et al. Effects of baroreflex regulation of sympathetic activity in humans. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H798–H803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rosén T, Edén S, Larson G, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. Acta Endocrinol (Copenhagen). 1993;129:195–200.
  36. Rea RF, Hamdan M. Baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in borderline hypertension. Circulation. 1990;82:856–862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, et al. Baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in essential and secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1998;31:68–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Eckberg DL, Rea RF, Andersson OK, et al. Baroreflex modulation of sympathetic activity and sympathetic neurotransmitters in human. Acta Physiol Scand. 1988;133:221–231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Carlsson J, Hedner J, Sellgren J, et al. Depressed baroreflex sensitivity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1490–1496.[Abstract]
  40. Macefield VG, Wallin BG, Vallbo ÅB. The discharge behavior of single vasoconstrictor motoneurones in human muscle nerves. J Physiol. 1994;481:799–809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Macefield VG, Wallin BG. Firing properties of single vasoconstrictor neurones in subjects with high levels of muscle sympathetic activity. J Physiol. 1999;516:293–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Ichinose, M. Saito, N. Fujii, T. Ogawa, K. Hayashi, N. Kondo, and T. Nishiyasu
Modulation of the control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during incremental leg cycling
J. Physiol., June 1, 2008; 586(11): 2753 - 2766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Grassi
Qualitative Assessment of Sympathetic Neural Drive in Cardiometabolic Disease: A New Challenge
Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 835 - 836.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Ichinose, M. Saito, N. Fujii, N. Kondo, and T. Nishiyasu
Modulation of the control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during severe orthostatic stress
J. Physiol., November 1, 2006; 576(3): 947 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Murai, S. Takata, M. Maruyama, M. Nakano, D. Kobayashi, K.-i. Otowa, M. Takamura, T. Yuasa, S. Sakagami, and S. Kaneko
The activity of a single muscle sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerve unit is affected by physiological stress in humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H853 - H860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Ichinose, M. Saito, T. Ogawa, K. Hayashi, N. Kondo, and T. Nishiyasu
Modulation of control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during orthostatic stress in humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2147 - H2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Oda, H. Asanoi, H. Ueno, K. Yamada, S. Joho, T. Kameyama, T. Hirai, T. Nozawa, S. Takashima, and H. Inoue
Pulse-synchronous sympathetic burst power as a new index of sympathoexcitation in patients with heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1821 - H1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. S. Kimmerly and J. K. Shoemaker
Hypovolemia and MSNA discharge patterns: assessing and interpreting sympathetic responses
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): H1198 - H1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sverrisdóttir, Y. B.
Right arrow Articles by Elam, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sverrisdóttir, Y. B.
Right arrow Articles by Elam, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies