This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nickenig, G. Articles by Böhm, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nickenig, G. Articles by Böhm, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB ESTRADIOL PROGESTERONE Related Collections Pathophysiology Risk Factors Other hypertension Gene expression Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2000;102:1828.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Basic Science Reports

Differential Effects of Estrogen and Progesterone on AT₁ Receptor Gene Expression in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Georg Nickenig, MD; Kerstin Strehlow, MD; Sven Wassmann, MD; Anselm T. Bäumer, MD; Katja Albory, MS; Heinrich Sauer, MD; Michael Böhm, MD

From the Klinik III für Innere Medizin and the Institut für Physiologie (H.S.), Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Georg Nickenig, Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Joseph-Stelzmann-Straße 9, 50924 Köln, Germany. E-mail georg.nickenig{at}uni-koeln.de

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background—The beneficial vasoprotective effects of a postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy may be prevented by a concomitant administration of progestins. To investigate the differential effects of estrogens and progesterone, we examined their influence on AT₁ receptor gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs).

Methods and Results—17ß-Estradiol caused downregulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA expression to 46±14%, whereas progesterone led to a significant upregulation to 201±29%, as assessed by Northern analysis. Western blots revealed that estrogen induced a downregulation and progesterone an upregulation of the AT₁ receptor protein. Estrogen-induced decrease of AT₁ receptor expression was mediated through activation of estrogen receptors. Nuclear run-on assays revealed that 17ß-estradiol did not alter AT₁ receptor mRNA transcription rate, whereas progesterone caused an enhanced AT₁ receptor mRNA transcription rate. 17ß-Estradiol decreased the AT₁ receptor mRNA half-life from 5 to 2 hours, whereas progesterone induced a stabilization of AT₁ receptor mRNA to a half-life of 10 hours. Preincubation of VSMCs with PD98059, SB203580, herbimycin, wortmannin, or N-nitro-L-arginine suggested that 17ß-estradiol caused AT₁ receptor downregulation through nitric oxide–dependent pathways. Progesterone caused AT₁ receptor overexpression via PI₃-kinase activation. Angiotensin II–induced release of reactive oxygen species was inhibited by estrogens. Progesterone itself enhanced the production of reactive oxygen species.

Conclusions—Because AT₁ receptor regulation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and atherosclerosis, the differential effects of estrogen and progesterone on the expression of this gene may in part explain the potentially counteracting effects of these reproductive hormones on the incidence of postmenopausal cardiovascular diseases.

Key Words: receptors • angiotensin • muscle, smooth • hypertension • atherosclerosis • hormones

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Several lines of epidemiological evidence indicate that estrogens play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and atherosclerosis. First, at a young age, women suffer considerably less cardiovascular disease than men. Second, after menopause, the natural state of estrogen deficiency, the incidence of cardiovascular disease rises steeply in women.^{1 2} Finally, hormone replacement therapy potentially prevents the onset of cardiac events in postmenopausal women.^{3 4 5} The pathways by which estrogens interact with the cardiovascular physiology are not completely understood. Estrogens lower plasma lipoproteins,³ influence the renin-angiotensin system,^{6 7} exert antioxidative properties,⁸ and may act as calcium blocking agents.⁹ In addition, estrogens exert direct effects on the vessel wall, such as an increase of vascular NO production and modulation of expression of endothelial constitutive NO synthase (ecNOS).^{10 11 12}

Numerous retrospective studies have shown that estrogen replacement therapy may be useful in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in postmenopausal women.^{3 4 5} However, the first prospective and randomized study on that subject, the HERS trial,¹³ showed no advantage of hormone replacement therapy in terms of a lowered incidence of cardiac events in postmenopausal women who suffer from coronary heart disease. Among other things, this surprising outcome has been attributed to the addition of progesterone to the therapy regimen. Progesterone could display a number of potential adverse effects on the cardiovascular system that might overcome the beneficial influence of estrogens. In this context, reduction of HDL levels, downregulation of estrogen receptors, decreased carbohydrate tolerance, and reduced blood flow and vasodilatation have been reported.^{14 15 16 17} In any event, the molecular mechanisms by which a concomitant progesterone therapy could counteract the estrogen replacement treatment are not known in detail and are the subject of controversy, because some study results could not support the deleterious effects of progesterone.^{1 2}

The AT₁ receptor mediates many biological effects of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), such as vasoconstriction, water and sodium retention, free radical release, and cell growth.¹⁸ Therefore, activation of the AT₁ receptor has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Recently, it was shown that estrogen deficiency causes AT₁ receptor overexpression in vivo, leading to enhanced biological effects of the RAS, which could in part serve as explanation for the increase in cardiac events after menopause in women.¹⁹

We hypothesized that potentially counteracting effects of estrogens and progestins on the cardiovascular system could take place at the level of AT₁ receptor regulation. To further investigate the direct effects of these reproductive hormones on vascular cells, we examined their influence on AT₁ receptor gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and sought to clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Cell Culture
VSMCs were isolated from rat thoracic aorta (female Wistar-Kyoto, 6 to 10 weeks old, Charles River GmbH, Sulzfeld, Germany) by enzymatic dispersion and cultured over several passages. Cells were grown in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere at 37°C in DMEM without phenol and 10% FBS (free of steroid hormones, S-15-M, c.c.pro GmbH).

mRNA Isolation and Northern Analysis
Culture medium was aspirated, and RNA was isolated with 1 mL RNA-Clean. Ten-microgram aliquots were electrophoresed, transferred onto Hybond N membranes, and UV–cross-linked. Northern blots were prehybridized for 2 hours at 42°C in a buffer containing 50% deionized formamide, 0.5% SDS, 6x SSC, 10 µg/mL denatured salmon sperm DNA (Sigma Aldrich Chemicals), and 5x Denhardt’s solution and were then hybridized for 15 hours at 42°C with a random-primed, [³²P]dCTP-labeled rat AT₁ receptor cDNA probe in the same buffer but without Denhardt’s solution.

Nuclear Run-On Assay
After treatment, VSMCs were dispersed with trypsin and washed. The cell pellet was lysed for 10 minutes on ice, and the nuclei were isolated by centrifugation. The nuclear pellet was resuspended in a buffer containing 40% glycerol, 50 mmol/L Tris, 5 mmol/L MgCl₂, and 0.1 mmol/L EDTA. Nuclei (5x10⁸ to 20x10⁸ nuclei per reaction) were used to carry out the transcription in a reaction mixture containing 40% glycerol, 50 mmol/L Tris, 5 mmol/L MgCl₂, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L of CTP, GTP, and ATP, and 0.2 to 0.3 µmol/L [³²P]UTP (>3000 µCi/mmol) at 30°C for 30 minutes. Reactions were terminated, and radioactive RNA was isolated and purified. [³²P]UTP-labeled RNA (5x10⁶ to 1x10⁷ cpm) was dissolved in hybridization solution. Membranes were prehybridized for 2 hours at 42°C and hybridized at 42°C for 16 hours.

Western Blotting
VSMC samples were homogenized. Equal volumes of 2x SDS gel loading buffer (100 mmol/L Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 200 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 4% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, and 20% glycerol) were added, and samples were heated to 95°C for 10 minutes. The samples were then sonicated and spun at 10 000g for 10 minutes at room temperature. Twenty-five micrograms of protein of the supernatant was run through a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Western blotting of proteins was performed in a semidry blotting chamber (Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were then incubated in 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS for 1 hour and washed with PBS-Tween (0.1%). The first antibody (AT₁ [N-10]: sc 1173, rabbit polyclonal IgG, Santa Cruz) was diluted 1:500 and incubated with the membrane for 1 hour at room temperature. The second, horseradish peroxidase–labeled antibody (anti-rabbit, Sigma), was diluted to 1:5000 and incubated with the membrane for 1 hour at room temperature. After the last washing step, enzyme-linked chemiluminescence detection was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Amersham).

Measurement of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species
Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured by 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) fluorescence with confocal laser scanning microscopy techniques. Dishes of subconfluent cells were washed and incubated in the dark for 30 minutes in the presence of 10 mmol/L 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H₂DCF-DA, Molecular Probes). Culture dishes were transferred to a Zeiss Axiovert 135 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss), equipped with a x25, numerical aperture 0.8, oil-immersion objective (Plan-Neofluar, Carl Zeiss) and Zeiss LSM 410 confocal attachment, and ROS generation was detected as a result of the oxidation of H₂DCF (excitation, 488 nm; emission long-pass LP515-nm filter set). Pixel images (512x512) were collected by single rapid scans. In 4 separate experiments, 5 groups of 25 cells each were randomly selected from the image, and fluorescence intensity was taken. The relative fluorescence intensities are average values of all experiments, and each value reflects measurements performed on a minimum of 100 cells for each sample.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with the ANOVA test.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
The influence of estrogen and progestin on AT₁ receptor mRNA in VSMCs was measured. Cells were incubated for 0 to 24 hours with 1 µmol/L of either 17ß-estradiol or progesterone, and AT₁ receptor mRNA was measured by Northern blotting. Figure 1, A and B, shows that 17ß-estradiol caused a significant decrease of AT₁ receptor mRNA after 2 hours, reaching the maximum after 4 hours of 46±14% of control levels (P<0.05). In contrast, progesterone led to an upregulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA, with a maximal effect of 201±29% reached after 12 hours (Figure 1, A and B). Control experiments in which VSMCs were incubated with vehicle showed that AT₁ receptor and GAPDH mRNA levels remained stable over the experimental period of 24 hours (data not shown). Both 17ß-estradiol and progesterone led to concentration-dependent modulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA in VSMCs (Figure 1C). After a 4-hour treatment, the maximal effect was measured at 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol, which led to a reduction of AT₁ receptor mRNA to 41±6% of control cells (P<0.05). The maximal progesterone effect was reached at a concentration of 1 µmol/L after a 12-hour incubation (215±7%). In all experimental setups, GAPDH mRNA and 18S mRNA levels were not altered (data not shown).

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Effect of 17ß-estradiol and progesterone on AT1 receptor mRNA expression. A, Representative autoradiography of Northern hybridization of AT1 receptor cDNA probe to RNA isolated from VSMCs stimulated for 0 to 24 hours with either 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol or 1 mmol/L progesterone. Also displayed are GAPDH signals detected from same Northern membrane. B, Densitometric analysis showing time dependency of effect of 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol and 1 µmol/L progesterone on expression of AT1 receptor mRNA in VSMCs. Mean±SEM, n=5, *P<0.05. C, Effect of 17ß-estradiol and progesterone at various doses on expression of AT1 receptor mRNA in VSMCs. Densitometric analysis. Mean±SEM, n=4, *P<0.05.

To assess whether this modulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA expression translates into comparable changes in AT₁ receptor mRNA protein levels, VSMCs were incubated for 4 and 12 hours with 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol and for 12 and 24 hours with 1 µmol/L progesterone. Total protein was isolated, and Western analysis was used to quantify AT₁ receptor protein. Figure 2 illustrates that 17ß-estradiol caused a significant downregulation (48±7% and 32±5% of control levels), whereas progesterone induced an upregulation (173±4% and 226±32% of control levels), of AT₁ receptor protein expression. Control experiments had shown that a 0- to 24-hour incubation with vehicle did not modulate AT₁ receptor expression (data not shown).

View larger version (54K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Effect of 17ß-estradiol and progesterone on AT1 receptor protein expression. Western blot of proteins isolated from VSMCs stimulated for 4 and 12 hours with 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol and for 12 and 24 hours with 1 µmol/L progesterone. Representative autoradiography and densitometric analysis. Mean±SEM, n=3, *P<0.05.

The specificity of the 17ß-estradiol effect on the expression of the AT₁ receptor mRNA was tested by use of the biologically inactive stereoisomer 17-estradiol and the estrogen receptor antagonists ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen. VSMCs were incubated for 4 hours with 1 µmol/L 17-estradiol, 1 µmol/L tamoxifen, 1 µmol/L ICI 182,780, 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol, and either ICI 182,780 or tamoxifen before AT₁ receptor mRNA expression was measured by Northern analysis. Whereas 17-estradiol, ICI 182,780, and tamoxifen exerted no effect on AT₁ receptor mRNA expression, 17ß-estradiol caused a significant downregulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA. Tamoxifen as well as ICI 182,780 abolished the 17ß-estradiol–induced effects on AT₁ receptor mRNA (Figure 3A). In addition, the involvement of progesterone receptor activation was tested by coincubation of 1 µmol/L progesterone and 1 µmol/L Ru486. Figure 3B shows that the progesterone receptor antagonist completely abolished the effect of progesterone.

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effect of estrogen receptor activation on AT1 receptor mRNA expression. A, VSMCs were incubated for 4 hours with 1 µmol/L of 17ß-estradiol (17ß-E), 17-estradiol (17-E), ICI 182,780, or tamoxifen. Total RNA was isolated and AT1 receptor mRNA quantified via Northern blotting. B, VSMCs were incubated for 12 hours with 1 µmol/L of either progesterone, RU486, or progesterone and RU486. Total RNA was isolated and AT1 receptor mRNA quantified by Northern blotting. Densitometric analysis. Mean±SEM, n=3, *P<0.05, **P<0.05 17 ß-E vs tamoxifen and 17 ß-E.

To investigate the potential mechanism mediating regulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA expression, we evaluated the effect of either 17ß-estradiol or progesterone on the AT₁ receptor gene transcription rate. VSMCs were treated for 4 hours with 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol or vehicle and for 12 hours with 1 µmol/L progesterone or vehicle. Nuclei were then isolated, and nuclear run-on assays were performed. Figure 4 shows a representative autoradiogram of radiolabeled, de novo synthesized mRNA to the AT₁ receptor, GAPDH, and plasmid DNA, and the densitometric analysis of 3 separate experiments. The relative intensity of the AT₁ receptor signal is compared with GAPDH mRNA signal intensity. 17ß-Estradiol had no effect on the rate of the de novo synthesis of AT₁ receptor mRNA. Progesterone increased the AT₁ receptor mRNA transcription rate from 117±2% to 152±5% (AT₁/GAPDH ratio). The hybridization signals elicited by the control vector were comparable between the treatment groups.

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Effect of 17ß-estradiol and progesterone on AT1 receptor mRNA transcription rate. VSMCs were incubated with vehicle (4 and 12 hours), 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol (4 hours), or 1 µmol/L progesterone (12 hours). Nuclei were isolated and nuclear run-on assays performed. A representative autoradiogram and densitometric analysis are demonstrated. Signal intensities of AT1 receptor and GAPDH mRNA were calculated. AT1 receptor/GAPDH ratio is shown. Mean±SEM, n=3.

Further experiments measured the effect of either 17ß-estradiol or progesterone on AT₁ receptor mRNA stability. VSMCs were preincubated with either vehicle, 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol (4 hours), or 1 µmol/L progesterone (12 hours); transcription was blocked with 50 µg/mL 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole (DRB), and total RNA was isolated 0 to 8 hours after the addition of DRB. Figure 5 shows the quantification of AT₁ receptor mRNA. Under control conditions, the AT₁ receptor mRNA half-life was measured at 5 hours. 17ß-Estradiol destabilized AT₁ receptor mRNA, resulting in an AT₁ receptor mRNA half-life of 2 hours; progesterone stabilized AT₁ receptor mRNA to a half-life of 10 hours. GAPDH mRNA levels remained stable over the experimental period (data not shown).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Effect of 17ß-estradiol and progesterone on AT1 receptor mRNA stability. Cells were preincubated for 4 hours with 17ß-estradiol or 12 hours with 1 µmol/L progesterone before 50 µg/mL DRB was added to block transcription. Total RNA was isolated at indicated time points, and AT1 receptor mRNA was quantified by Northern analysis. Mean±SEM, n=3, *P<0.05.

By means of various pharmacological inhibitors, the involved signal transduction pathways were characterized. VSMCs were preincubated with 1 µmol/L PD98059 (p42/44 MAP kinase inhibitor), 1 µmol/L SB203580 (p38 MAP kinase inhibitor), 1 µmol/L of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin, 1 µmol/L of the phosphatidylinositol (PI₃)-kinase inhibitor wortmannin, or the NO inhibitor N-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 10 µmol/L) followed by a coincubation with 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol (4 hours) or 1 µmol/L progesterone (12 hours). The densitometric analysis of the Northern blots quantifying AT₁ receptor mRNA is depicted in Figure 6. The estrogen-mediated downregulation of AT₁ receptor mRNA was inhibited only by L-NNA, suggesting an NO-dependent downregulation of the AT₁ receptor. In contrast, the progesterone-caused AT₁ receptor upregulation was abolished on coincubation with wortmannin, which supports the concept that PI₃-kinase is involved in this induced modulation of AT₁ receptor gene expression. All inhibitors were also used in concentrations from 10 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L. PD98059, SB203580, and genistein did not blunt the effects of 17ß-estradiol or progesterone on AT₁ receptor expression, even if applied in high concentrations (data not shown).

View larger version (60K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Signal transduction pathways involved in AT1 receptor regulation induced by 17ß-estradiol and progesterone. VSMCs were coincubated with either 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol (4 hours) or 1 µmol/L progesterone (12 hours) with the following compounds: PD, PD98059 (1 µmol/L); SB, SB203580 (1 µmol/L); H, herbimycin (1 µmol/L); W, wortmannin (1 µmol/L); or NA, L-NNA (10 µmol/L). AT1 receptor mRNA was assessed after isolation of total RNA and Northern blot. Densitometric analysis of Northern blots quantifying AT1 receptor mRNA is depicted for 17ß-estradiol (E) in A and progesterone (P) in B. C indicates control. Mean±SEM, n=3, *P<0.05, **P<0.05 E vs NA+E or P vs W+P.

AT₁ receptor activation causes free radical release in VSMCs. To evaluate the functional relevance of the AT₁ receptor regulation, cells were preincubated for various time points with either 1 µmol/L 17ß-estradiol or 1 µmol/L progesterone, followed by a 4-hour incubation with 1 µmol/L angiotensin II. Production of free radicals was assessed via DCF fluorescence. Figure 7 shows that angiotensin II led to a profound increase of ROS, which was inhibited by a 12-hour preincubation with 17ß-estradiol. 17ß-Estradiol itself had no effect on the basal release of free radicals. In addition, only a long-term preincubation with estrogens (12 to 24 hours) lowered angiotensin II–caused production of ROS (data not shown). Progesterone itself significantly enhanced the release of free radicals. No further increase of angiotensin II–induced production of ROS was detected.

View larger version (133K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. Effect of progesterone and 17ß-estradiol on angiotensin II–induced intracellular production of ROS in VSMCs. Representative microscopic scan. VSMCs were preincubated for 12 hours with 1 µmol/L progesterone or 17ß-estradiol or vehicle, followed by a 4-hour incubation with 1 µmol/L angiotensin II. Free radical production is visualized through DCF fluorescence.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
The incidence of cardiovascular disease is low in premenopausal women, but it increases steadily in postmenopausal women. In addition, postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy may reduce this rise of cardiovascular events, as suggested by retrospective studies.^{1 2 3 4 5} The vasoprotective potential of estrogens has been attributed primarily to its effects on serum lipid concentrations.³ However, an increasing body of evidence indicates that direct effects of estrogens on blood vessels contribute significantly to their cardioprotective effects.²⁰ Activation of estrogen - and ß-receptors causes long-term effects on cellular gene expression programs, which are thought to be mediated by genomic effects of the activated steroid receptors. Intriguingly, estrogens also induce nongenomic, rapid effects in vascular cells that obviously occur independently of modulation of gene expression. One of the most prominent features seems to be a rapid vasodilatory effect of estrogen, which is elicited through endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent mechanisms. Current data suggest that estrogens enhance the bioavailability of NO through stimulation of NOS and NO release and potentially also through the antioxidant properties of estrogens.^{10 11 12 20} In addition to these short-term effects on the vascular motility, the described rapid actions of estrogens, such as stimulation of NO release, may also cause longer-lasting effects on vascular cells that ultimately contribute to the atheroprotective effects of estrogens.

Progesterone, which is frequently administered concomitantly with estrogens in postmenopausal replacement therapy, is thought to counteract some of the atheroprotective features of estrogens. This has been attributed primarily to adverse effects on lipid levels and carbohydrate metabolism.^{14 15 16 17} Although the cellular effects of progesterone on the vessel wall are currently unknown, it may be hypothesized that the potentially harmful influences of progesterone on cardiovascular events are also mediated through a direct impact on vascular cells. The data presented demonstrate, for the first time, a direct effect of progesterone on vascular cells, which may relate to the epidemiological evidence of hazardous effects of progesterone on the cardiovascular system. Some studies, eg, the Nurses Health Study, have shown that progesterone did not blunt the beneficial effects of estrogens.^{1 2} These controversial data display the remaining uncertainty with respect to the vascular effects of progesterone.

The AT₁ receptor, which induces vasoconstriction, cellular growth, and free radical release in the vessel,¹⁸ is regulated by angiotensin II, lipoproteins, growth factors, and insulin, among other things.^{21 22 23 24} It has recently been reported that estrogen deficiency leads to overexpression of the vascular AT₁ receptor, which is preventable by estrogen replacement therapy.¹⁹ Most likely, the underlying mechanism for these changes is the modulation of AT₁ receptor gene expression in VSMCs by estrogens, as shown in the present study. 17ß-Estradiol leads to a dose- and time-dependent downregulation of AT₁ receptors in VSMCs. This effect is mediated by estrogen receptors and involves the destabilization of the AT₁ receptor mRNA. The latter seems to be the principal cellular mechanism by which AT₁ receptor expression is modulated.²¹ Although MAP kinase activation has been described on stimulation with estrogens,²⁵ this signal transduction pathway is not participating in the estrogen-induced AT₁ receptor regulation. Estrogen-caused release of NO seems to be a prerequisite of the described regulative pathways, as shown by the inhibition of estrogen-induced AT₁ receptor downregulation by an NO inhibitor. This is in agreement with previous findings that NO is released on estrogen stimulation. Moreover, it has been shown that NO is involved in AT₁ receptor downregulation by, for example, cytokines in VSMCs.^{26 27} The effect of estrogen seems to be mediated by estrogen receptors, because the estrogen receptor antagonists ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen abolished the AT₁ receptor–downregulating effect of 17ß-estradiol. 17-Estradiol, which does not activate estrogen - or ß-receptors, showed no effect on AT₁ receptor expression.

Surprisingly, progesterone causes a profound upregulation of AT₁ receptor gene expression mediated through stabilization of the AT₁ receptor mRNA. In striking contrast to the mode of action of estrogen, this effect on AT₁ receptor gene expression is mediated through activation of PI₃-kinase.

The current concept of heterologous AT₁ receptor regulation ascribes a pivotal role to posttranscriptional mechanisms.²¹ Stabilization or destabilization of AT₁ receptor mRNA seems to participate decisively in the modulation of AT₁ receptor expression. The signal transduction pathways involved in this phenomenon are less clear. MAP kinase activation, cytosolic calcium release, cAMP accumulation, and NO have been implicated in transcriptional as well as posttranscriptional regulation of AT₁ receptor gene expression.^{21 22 23 24} Nevertheless, the factors downstream of this signaling event are unknown. There is evidence that mRNA binding proteins induce (de)stabilization of the AT₁ receptor mRNA, but the detailed mechanisms have not yet been elucidated.²¹ It may be speculated that PI₃-kinase activation as well as NO release interact directly or indirectly with these binding proteins, leading to changes in AT₁ receptor mRNA degradation. Interestingly, NO obviously plays a role in the modulation of ecNOS stability.²⁸ According to recent findings, ecNOS stability is dependent on distinct mRNA binding proteins. Therefore, NO could potentially play a role in the regulation of events involved in the AT₁ receptor mRNA processing, as suggested by the presented data.

The AT₁ receptor regulation by estrogens and progesterone is accompanied by functional alterations in VSMCs, as shown by the altered angiotensin II–induced release of ROS. In general, activation of the AT₁ receptor is a major source for ROS in the vessel wall, and these ROS are closely involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and hypertension. Our data indicate that the antioxidant properties of estrogens could be mediated at least in part through the downregulation of the AT₁ receptor. Furthermore, estrogen-induced AT₁ receptor downregulation could be related to a decreased vasoconstriction and cell growth. In contrast, progesterone-induced AT₁ receptor upregulation would lead to the opposite effect. Progesterone itself enhances the release of free radicals, suggesting a direct interaction of progesterone with enzymatic systems such as NAD(P)H oxidase. The latter, and the upregulation of the AT₁ receptor, are possible mechanisms by which administration of progesterone causes a decreased blood flow and an increased vascular resistance in postmenopausal women.²⁹ The failure to show a reduction of cardiovascular mortality by hormone replacement therapy in the HERS trial has also been explained by the concomitant progesterone treatment, which could be attributed at least in part to the overexpression of AT₁ receptors.

Our findings demonstrate a direct impact of estrogen and progesterone on VSMCs, providing novel insights into the mechanisms of action of reproductive hormones in the vasculature. Whereas the estrogen-induced, NO-dependent AT₁ receptor downregulation may contribute to the atheroprotective effects of estrogens, the progesterone-caused AT₁ receptor overexpression may in part explain the adverse influences of progesterone on the cardiovascular system.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Köln Fortune Program/Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and the Deutsche Herzstiftung.

Received March 10, 2000; revision received May 4, 2000; accepted May 8, 2000.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
1. Wenger NK, Speroff L, Packard B. Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med.. 1993;329:247–256.[Free Full Text]

2. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1105–1110.[Abstract]

3. Hong MK, Romm PA, Reagan K, et al. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on serum lipid values and angiographically defined coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:176–178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Koepsell TD, et al. Duration of estrogen replacement therapy in relation to the risk of incident myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1330–1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Nabulsi AA, Folsom AR, White A, et al. Association of hormone-replacement therapy with various cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. N Engl J Med.. 1993;328:1069–1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Erkkola R, Lammintausta R, Punnonen R, et al. The effect of estriol succinate therapy on plasma renin activity and urinary aldosterone in postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 1978;1:9–14.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Schunkert H, Danser AH, Hense HW, et al. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the renin-angiotensin system in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1997;95:39–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Liehr JG. Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of estrogens. J Lab Clin Med. 1996;128:344–345.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Freay AD, Curtis SW, Korach KS, et al. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by estrogen in depolarized rat and mouse aorta: role of nuclear estrogen receptor and Ca²⁺ uptake. Circ Res. 1997;81:242–248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Jiang C, Sarrel PM, Lindsay DC, et al. Endothelium-independent relaxation of rabbit coronary artery by 17ß-oestradiol in vitro. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;104:1033–1037.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Lantin-Hermoso RL, Rosenfeld CR, Yuhanna IS, et al. Estrogen acutely stimulates nitric oxide synthase activity in fetal pulmonary artery endothelium. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:L119–L126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Caullin-Glaser T, Garcia-Cardena G, Sarrel P, et al. 17ß-Estradiol regulation of human endothelial cell basal nitric oxide release, independent of cytosolic Ca²⁺ mobilization. Circ Res. 1997;81:885–892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al, for the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) research group. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 1998;280:605–613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Sullivan JM, Shala BA, Miller LA, et al. Progestin enhances vasoconstrictor responses in post menopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy. Menopause. 1995;4:193–197.

15. Miyagawa K, Rosch J, Stanczyk F, et al. Medroxiprogesterone interferes with ovarian steroid protection against coronary vasospasm. Nat Med. 1997;3:324–327.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Walsh, BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, et al. Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1196–1204.[Abstract]

17. Sarrel PM. How progestins compromise the cardioprotective effects of estrogens. Menopause. 1995;2:187–190.

18. Griendling KK, Murphy TJ, Alexander RW. Molecular biology of the renin-angiotensin system. Circulation. 1993;87:1816–1828.[Free Full Text]

19. Nickenig G, Bäumer AT, Grohé C, et al. Estrogen modulates AT₁ receptor gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. 1998;97:2197–2201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1801–1811.[Free Full Text]

21. Nickenig G, Murphy TJ. Enhanced AT1 receptor mRNA degradation and induction of polyribosomal mRNA binding proteins by angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1996;50:743–751.[Abstract]

22. Nickenig G, Murphy TJ. Down-regulation by growth factors of vascular smooth muscle angiotensin receptor gene expression. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46:653–659.[Abstract]

23. Nickenig G, Sachinidis A, Michaelsen F, et al. Upregulation of vascular angiotensin II receptor gene expression by low-density lipoprotein in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 1997;95:473–478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Nickenig G, Röling J, Strehlow K, et al. Insulin induces upregulation of vascular AT₁ receptor gene expression by posttranscriptional mechanisms. Circulation. 1998;98:2453–2460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Migliaccio A, Di Domenico M, Castoria G. Tyrosine kinase/p21ras/MAP-kinase pathway activation by estradiol-receptor complex in MCF-7 cells. EMBO J. 1996;15:1292–1300.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Sasmura H, Nakazato Y, Hayashida T, et al. Regulation of vascular type 1 angiotensin receptors by cytokines. Hypertension. 1997;30:35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Ichiki T, Usui M, Kato M, et al. Downregulation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene transcription by nitric oxide. Hypertension. 1998;31:342–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Yuhanna IS, MacRitchie AN, Lantin-Hermoso RL, et al. Nitric oxide (NO) upregulates NO synthase expression in fetal intrapulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;21:629–636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Mercuro G, Pitzalis L, Podda A, et al. Effects of acute administration of natural progesterone on peripheral vascular responsiveness in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:214–218.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Baumhakel, F. Custodis, N. Schlimmer, U. Laufs, and M. Bohm Improvement of Endothelial Function of the Corpus Cavernosum in Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice Treated with Irbesartan J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2008; 327(3): 692 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Chen, S. Yang, S. Hu, M. A. Choudhry, K. I. Bland, and I. H. Chaudry Estrogen prevents intestinal inflammation after trauma-hemorrhage via downregulation of angiotensin II and angiotensin II subtype I receptor Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): G1131 - G1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Kuipers, P. van der Harst, G. Navis, L. van Genne, F. Morello, W. H. van Gilst, D. J. van Veldhuisen, and R. A. de Boer Nuclear Hormone Receptors as Regulators of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1442 - 1448. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Mendez-Bolaina, J. Sanchez-Gonzalez, I. Ramirez-Sanchez, E. Ocharan-Hernandez, M. Nunez-Sanchez, E. Meaney-Mendiolea, A. Meaney, J. Asbun-Bojalil, A. Miliar-Garcia, I. Olivares-Corichi, et al. Effect of caveolin-1 scaffolding peptide and 17 -estradiol on intracellular Ca2+ kinetics evoked by angiotensin II in human vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): C1953 - C1961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Elton and M. M. Martin Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Gene Regulation: Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Mechanisms Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 953 - 961. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Martin, E. J. Lee, J. A. Buckenberger, T. D. Schmittgen, and T. S. Elton MicroRNA-155 Regulates Human Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression in Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18277 - 18284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Paul, A. Poyan Mehr, and R. Kreutz Physiology of local Renin-Angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 747 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gimenez, M. P. Garcia, M. Serna, B. Bonacasa, L. F. Carbonell, T. Quesada, and I. Hernandez 17{beta}-Oestradiol enhances the acute hypotensive effect of captopril in female ovariectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats Exp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 91(4): 715 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y Shimoni, D Hunt, M Chuang, K. Y Chen, G Kargacin, and D. L Severson Modulation of potassium currents by angiotensin and oxidative stress in cardiac cells from the diabetic rat J. Physiol., August 15, 2005; 567(1): 177 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H-H Chao, J-J Chen, C-H Chen, H Lin, C-F Cheng, W-S Lian, Y-L Chen, S-H Juan, J-C Liu, J-Y Liou, et al. Inhibition of angiotensin II induced endothelin-1 gene expression by 17-{beta}-oestradiol in rat cardiac fibroblasts Heart, May 1, 2005; 91(5): 664 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tsuda, M. Iwai, J.-M. Li, H.-S. Li, L.-J. Min, A. Ide, M. Okumura, J. Suzuki, M. Mogi, H. Suzuki, et al. Inhibitory Effects of AT1 Receptor Blocker, Olmesartan, and Estrogen on Atherosclerosis Via Anti-Oxidative Stress Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 545 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Dean, J. Tan, E. R. O'Brien, and F. H. H. Leenen 17{beta}-Estradiol downregulates tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme and ANG II type 1 receptor in female rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): R759 - R766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Harvey, B. L. Morris, J. A. Miller, and J. S. Floras Estradiol Induces Discordant Angiotensin and Blood Pressure Responses to Orthostasis in Healthy Postmenopausal Women Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 399 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Antus, S. Liu, Y. Yao, H. Zou, E. Song, J. Lutz, and U. Heemann Effects of progesterone and selective oestrogen receptor modulators on chronic allograft nephropathy in rats Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 329 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Shimoni and X.-F. Liu Gender differences in ANG II levels and action on multiple K+ current modulation pathways in diabetic rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H311 - H319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wassmann, M. Stumpf, K. Strehlow, A. Schmid, B. Schieffer, M. Bohm, and G. Nickenig Interleukin-6 Induces Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Dysfunction by Overexpression of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Circ. Res., March 5, 2004; 94(4): 534 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Ahmed, A. K. Kang, K. D. Burns, C. R. J. Kennedy, V. Lai, D. C. Cattran, J. W. Scholey, and J. A. Miller Effects of Oral Contraceptive Use on the Renal and Systemic Vascular Response to Angiotensin II Infusion J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 780 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Orshal and R. A. Khalil Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): R233 - R249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Harrison-Bernard, I. H. Schulman, and L. Raij Postovariectomy Hypertension Is Linked to Increased Renal AT1 Receptor and Salt Sensitivity Hypertension, December 1, 2003; 42(6): 1157 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Strehlow, S. Rotter, S. Wassmann, O. Adam, C. Grohe, K. Laufs, M. Bohm, and G. Nickenig Modulation of Antioxidant Enzyme Expression and Function by Estrogen Circ. Res., July 25, 2003; 93(2): 170 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Shimoni and X.-F. Liu Sex differences in the modulation of K+ currents in diabetic rat cardiac myocytes J. Physiol., July 15, 2003; 550(2): 401 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Strehlow, N. Werner, J. Berweiler, A. Link, U. Dirnagl, J. Priller, K. Laufs, L. Ghaeni, M. Milosevic, M. Bohm, et al. Estrogen Increases Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cell Production and Diminishes Neointima Formation Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3059 - 3065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Laufs, O. Adam, K. Strehlow, S. Wassmann, C. Konkol, K. Laufs, W. Schmidt, M. Bohm, and G. Nickenig Down-regulation of Rac-1 GTPase by Estrogen J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5956 - 5962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Antus, P. Hamar, G. Kokeny, Z. Szollosi, I. Mucsi, Z. Nemes, and L. Rosivall Estradiol is nephroprotective in the rat remnant kidney Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 54 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Armando, M. Jezova, A. V. Juorio, J. A. Terron, A. Falcon-Neri, C. Semino-Mora, H. Imboden, and J. M. Saavedra Estrogen upregulates renal angiotensin II AT2 receptors Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): F934 - F943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Lonn, R. Roccaforte, Q. Yi, G. Dagenais, P. Sleight, J. Bosch, P. Suhan, M. Micks, J. Probstfield, V. Bernstein, et al. Effect of long-term therapy with ramipril in high-risk women J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 21, 2002; 40(4): 693 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Pare, A. Krust, R. H. Karas, S. Dupont, M. Aronovitz, P. Chambon, and M. E. Mendelsohn Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Mediates the Protective Effects of Estrogen Against Vascular Injury Circ. Res., May 31, 2002; 90(10): 1087 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Keidar, R. Heinrich, M. Kaplan, and M. Aviram Oxidative stress increases the expression of the angiotensin-II receptor type 1 in mouse peritoneal macrophages Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2002; 3(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Fischer, A. Baessler, and H. Schunkert Renin angiotensin system and gender differences in the cardiovascular system Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 672 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Nickenig and D. G. Harrison The AT1-Type Angiotensin Receptor in Oxidative Stress and Atherogenesis: Part II: AT1 Receptor Regulation Circulation, January 29, 2002; 105(4): 530 - 536. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nickenig, G. Articles by Böhm, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nickenig, G. Articles by Böhm, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB ESTRADIOL PROGESTERONE Related Collections Pathophysiology Risk Factors Other hypertension Gene expression Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide